Next Article in Journal
Application of a Machine Learning Method for Prediction of Urban Neighborhood-Scale Air Pollution
Previous Article in Journal
The Relationship between the Frontal QRS-T Angle on ECG and Physical Activity Level in Young Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Sleep Quality in Heart Disease Patients with and without Heart Failure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sleep Quality and Cognitive Function after Stroke: The Mediating Roles of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms

1
Tenth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
2
College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane 4000, Australia
3
Chest Hospital, Shanghai 200030, China
4
Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2410; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032410
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 13 January 2023 / Accepted: 23 January 2023 / Published: 29 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sleep and Chronic Diseases)

Abstract

:
This study examined the association between post-stroke cognitive function and sleep status at 30 days post-stroke and evaluated the role of anxiety and depression as potential mediators of that association. The participants in this study were 530 acute ischemic stroke (IS) patients. Sleep disturbance at 30 days post-stroke was assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Basic patient information, cognitive function, depression, and anxiety status were assessed before discharge from the hospital. Stratified linear regression analysis models were fit to examine the associations between post-stroke sleep quality and the influencing factors. A structural equation model was developed to evaluate the role of anxiety and depression as potential mediators of sleep quality and cognitive function. At 30 days post-stroke, 58.7% of IS patients had sleep disturbance. Women and older IS patients were more likely to suffer poorer sleep quality (p < 0.05). A stratified linear regression analysis showed that the inclusion of cognitive function variables and indicators of depression and anxiety were statistically significant in predicting improvement in the sleep disturbance of AIS patients. Cognitive function, depression, anxiety, and sleep status were selected to construct a structural equation model. The total effect of cognitive function on sleep status was −0.274, with a direct effect of −0.097 and an indirect effect (through depression) of −0.177. The total effect of anxiety on sleep status was 0.235, with a direct effect of 0.186 and an indirect effect (through depression) of 0.049. IS patients often experience poor sleep quality. Depression in IS patients mediates two pathways: the pathway through which cognitive function affects sleep quality and the pathway through which anxiety affects sleep quality.

1. Introduction

Stroke is one of the major causes of death and disability in the world [1]. Ischemic stroke (IS) accounts for approximately 70% of strokes [2], and its prevalence is increasing year by year [3]. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) refers to the acute blood supply disorder of local brain tissue, which causes the brain tissue to undergo ischemia and hypoxic necrosis, resulting in neurological dysfunction [4]. IS has a significant impact on patients’ health outcomes and quality of life due to its high rates of morbidity, disability, recurrence, and mortality [5].
Poststroke sleep disturbances (PSSDs) are common following IS. Around 70% of AIS patients and 40% of patients in chronic post-stroke stages experience sleep disorders [6,7]. A large and growing body of literature has indicated that sleep-related problems should be considered in clinical management in addition to cognitive and physical impairments [8]. Sleep disturbances are also risk factors for stroke exacerbation and are strongly associated with the onset and progression of stroke. Although there have been significant advances in research on sleep disorders, PSSD is still underestimated and commonly ignored in clinical diagnosis and treatment [9]. Among adults with stroke, those with poor sleep have a 76% greater risk of early death than those with normal sleep [10]. Unrecognized and untreated sleep disorders may influence rehabilitation efforts, lead to poor functional outcomes following stroke, and increase the risk of stroke recurrence [11]. Data from several studies suggest that sleep and sleep loss bidirectionally alter structural plasticity, which can affect the functional output of the brain in terms of alertness and mood [12].
The existing literature on sleep disorders is extensive and focuses on factors affecting sleep such as age [13], body mass index (BMI) [14], depression [15], and anxiety [16]. Mounting evidence points to a potential connection between sleep and cognitive function [17]. A decline in cognitive function is not only reflected in the values assessed by the physician, but patients may also experience the feeling of cognitive decline in their daily lives. However, few studies have assessed whether cognitive function affects sleep in the months following stroke. Furthermore, little research focuses on the role of depression and anxiety status in the effect of cognitive function on sleep. Hence, there is a need for an investigation of the influence of depression and anxiety on the relationship between cognitive function and sleep disorders. In this study, we propose hypothesis 1: cognitive function affects the sleep quality of IS patients. Additionally, we propose hypothesis 2: Anxiety and depression play a role in the relationship between cognitive function and sleep quality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

A total of 569 adult Chinese patients with AIS were prospectively enrolled from among those listed on inpatient medical care rosters from three tertiary general hospitals in Shanghai from January 2021 to January 2022. Among the 569 patients who had experienced their first IS and had the potential to be included in this study, 39 failed to complete 30 days of data collection, leading to a 6.85% missing rate. The process of patient collection and exclusion is shown in Figure 1. A total of 530 patients were included in the study who completed the baseline data collection and the 30-day post-stroke sleep data collection in full. All patients received a neuroradiological exam (cranial plain CT or MRI (T1/T2/DWI)), and the results were consistent with the “Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2018 [4]”. To avoid the influence of unstable neurological conditions and environmental changes on the results, our investigation was conducted when the patient was conscious and exhibited stable vital signs after routine neurological treatment. A questionnaire on basic patient information, neurological and cognitive function, ADL, and anxiety and depression was administered 5.95 ± 2.12 days after admission to the hospital. All patients returned to their home environment after completing their general hospital treatment. Each patient’s sleep status was followed up by telephone at 30 days after diagnosis, and all questions were answered based on sleep in the past 30 days.
Patients who met any of the following conditions were excluded:
(1)
transient ischemic attack (TIA) diagnosed by neurologists;
(2)
unable to give appropriate responses to the questions on the questionnaires (altered consciousness, confusion, or aphasia);
(3)
diagnosed with dementia of any type or another neurodegenerative or neurological condition.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Approval Committee of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital. All participants provided written informed consent.

2.2. Measures

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cognitive function, anxiety, and depression affect patients’ sleep in the month following stroke and to analyze other factors that may contribute to patients’ sleep disturbance, such as age, activities of daily living (ADL), BMI, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to assess the sleep performance of IS patients 30 days after stroke and to identify risk factors for sleep disturbance.

2.2.1. Basic Information Collection and Functional Assessment

The basic information of patients included age, sex, marital status, education level, smoking, alcohol consumption, site of cerebral infarction, height, and weight. In this study, “smoke” was operationally defined as “current smokers” who had smoked within 30 days before the survey. “Drink” was operationally defined as consuming more than 15 g of alcohol per day within 30 days before the survey.
Each patient was assigned an NIHSS score. The NIHSS is used to assess the degree of neurological deficit after a patient has suffered a cerebral infarction. The NIHSS contains judgments on consciousness, speech, movement, sensation, ataxia, eye movement, and visual field. The higher the NIHSS score, the more severe the degree of neurological deficit. Baseline assessment provides a measure of stroke severity, and the effect of treatment can be measured periodically after treatment.
Each patient underwent ADL assessment since ADL competence is one of the most important indicators of the effectiveness of rehabilitation [18]. The Barthel index (BI) is the most commonly used scale in the world to assess ADL competence [19]. A series of studies have shown that BI has high reliability and sensitivity [20]. The BI consists of 10 items: feeding, bed and wheelchair transfer, personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, walking, walking up and down stairs, dressing, bowel control, and urinary control.

2.2.2. Assessment of Sleep Quality

The PSQI was used to measure the subjective sleep quality of AIS patients [21]. The PSQI is a self-reported questionnaire that assesses sleep quality using subjective ratings of 7 components: sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. The Chinese version of the PSQI was first translated in 1996 by Liu et al. [22]. In the past 20 years, the Chinese version of the PSQI has been widely used in the sleep quality assessment of different populations including college students [23], adolescents [24], nurses [25], older adults [26], and government employees [27]. The results of these studies indicate that the Chinese version of the PSQI is a reliable and valid instrument with internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and high criterion-related validity. The assessment of PSQI was performed by telephone follow-up at 30 days of discharge. Patients fill out the questionnaire based on their sleep status in the past month. The questionnaire has good evidence of validity and reliability [23,24,25]. In this study, patients with PSQI scores ≥ 8 were classified into the poor sleep quality (PSQ) group, and those with scores < 8 were classified into the good sleep quality (GSQ) group.

2.2.3. Assessment of Cognitive Function

The Beijing Revised Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) [28] was used in this study. This scale consists of 12 items with a total score of 30. The MoCA is divided into eight cognitive subscales: visuospatial/executive function, naming, attention, language, abstraction, memory, and orientation. The assessment of MoCA was performed while conscious and with stable vital signs after routine neurological treatment during hospitalization. The estimated time for the whole procedure is 10–15 min. The maximum score is 30, and lower scores indicate worse cognition. In this study, a score of ≥23 was classified as normal cognitive function and <23 as cognitive impairment [29]. To correct for the bias caused by educational level, a score of 1 was added to the total score for years of education ≤12 years and a score of 2 was added for illiteracy.

2.2.4. Assessment of Post-Stroke Anxiety and Depression

Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) are psychological scales developed by Zung [30] to measure the severity of anxiety and depression states and how they change during treatment, and they are commonly used psychometric instruments in clinical practice.

2.3. Data Analysis

EpiData 3.0 (Odense. Denmark) was used for data entry, and two researchers completed data entry separately to ensure data accuracy. The IBM SPSS statistical software version 22.0 (Armonk, NY, USA) for Windows was used to perform basic descriptive analyses. Descriptive statistics were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for variables with normal distributions and as median (interquartile range, IQR) for variables with skewed distributions. The reliability (internal consistency) was tested using the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which indicates the connectedness of items within a scale. Analysis of variance, the chi-squared test, and the rank sum test were used to analyze differences between the GSQ group and the PSQ group for each factor. Stratified linear regression analysis was used to create the regression equations. A p value of <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. The IBM AMOS 23 (Armonk, NY, USA) program was used to analyze the relationships between the constructs involved in the structural model. The bootstrap self-sampling count was set to 5000 for validation. Once the theoretical model was developed, path analysis was performed based on the relationships of the matrix identified via the structural equation analysis.

2.4. Patient and Public Involvement

No patients or members of the public were involved in the development of the research question or the design of this study.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients in the Two Sleep Quality Groups

A total of 530 patients with AIS were included in this study with a 30-day follow-up. To compare baseline characteristics, which are shown in Table 1, the 530 patients were divided into a PSQ group (n = 311) and a GSQ group (n = 219). A total of 377 men (71.73%) and 153 women (28.87%) were included in the study. The average age was 63.42 (SD = 10.31), and the average BMI was 24.33 (SD = 2.97). Additionally, 145 patients (27.36%) were working before having a stroke. The median values (IQR) of the NIHSS and ADL scores of patients were 3 (3) and 55 (25). In the past year, 217 (40.94%) patients drank alcohol and 204 (38.49%) patients smoked. Hypertension and diabetes were the most common chronic diseases among IS patients, with 325 (61.32%) having hypertension and 241 (45.47%) having diabetes. A comparative analysis of the PSQ group and the GSQ group revealed significant differences in terms of age, sex, drinking, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, SAS scores, SDS scores, and cognitive function.

3.2. Assessment of Patients’ Sleep Condition

The distribution of the scores on the seven dimensions of PSQI for the PSQ group and GSQ group is shown in Figure 2. The quality of sleep was considered “poor” or “very poor” by 266 (50.19%) patients. Furthermore, 156 (29.43%) patients slept less than 6 h per day, 159 (30%) patients had a sleep efficiency of less than 75%, and daytime dysfunction (sleepiness and low energy) was present in 319 (60.19%) patients.

3.3. Association between Sleep Quality and Related Influencing Factors in Is Patients

A stratified linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the association between sleep quality and related influencing factors. The results are shown in Table 2. In this study, the dependent variable, PSQI score, was a continuous variable with a linear relationship between all 12 independent variables. All variables had relatively independent observations, and there was no multicollinearity or significant outliers. Model 1 included PSQI scores and basic characteristics of IS patients. Based on the model 1 variables, neurological deficits (NIHSS) and ADL competence (BI) were added to create model 2. In this study, model 2 differed from model 1 only in the NIHSS and BI scores, suggesting that the inclusion of NIHSS and BI scores in the regression increased the explanatory power of the independent variables for the PSQI variance by 2.3%. Based on model 2, cognitive function (MOCA) variables were added to create model 3. Model 3 showed a 4.4% increase in the explanatory power of independent variables for the variance in PSQI. Based on model 3, depression (SDS) and anxiety (SAS) variables were added to create model 4. Model 3 showed a 21% increase in the explanatory power of independent variables for the variance in PSQI.

3.4. The Mediation Role of Depression (SDS) between MoCA, SAS, and PSQI

With the above statistical results, structural equation modeling was used to construct a pathway analysis of the interaction between depression (SDS), cognitive function (MoCA), anxiety (SAS), and sleep quality (PSQI). The initial model was tested using the maximum likelihood method, and the model fit parameters were as follows: X2/df = 1.242, P = 0.265, NFI = 0.996, RFI = 0.973, IFI = 0.999, CFI = 0.999, GFI = 0.999, TLI = 0.995, AGFI = 0.988, and RMSEA = 0.021, all of which met statistical criteria. There are two pathways through which cognitive function affects sleep quality. One is that cognitive function directly affects sleep quality, and the other is that cognitive function indirectly affects sleep quality by affecting depression. The standardized total effect of MoCA on PSQI was −0.274, with a standardized direct effect (PSQI←MoCA) of −0.097 and a standardized indirect effect (PSQI←SDS←MoCA) of −0.177. There are two pathways through which anxiety affects sleep quality. One is that anxiety directly affects sleep quality, and the other is that anxiety indirectly affects sleep quality by affecting depression. The standardized total effect of SAS on PSQI was 0.235, with a standardized direct effect (PSQI←SAS) of 0.186 and a standardized indirect effect (PSQI←SDS←SAS) of 0.049. The final model is presented in Figure 3. The regression weights for each variable are shown in Table 3. The above model was further tested using the bootstrap bias-corrected self-help method. The results are shown in Table 4.

4. Discussion

Given the significant role of PSSD in the prognosis of IS, this study aimed to determine whether sleep quality is affected by variables, such as age, BMI, sex, ADL competence, cognitive function, depression, and anxiety. This study focused on analyzing the association between PSSD and cognitive function after stroke and determining whether depression and anxiety mediated this association. The results of the regression analysis and structural equation model revealed that depression (SDS scores) and cognitive function (MoCA scores) best explained sleep quality.
The results of this study indicate that IS patients often experience poor sleep quality. As was mentioned in the literature review [31], PSSD is frequently reported after stroke, occurring in 21–77% of stroke patients. Sleep disturbances show a dynamic prevalence across different stroke phases. The literature points out that the prevalence rates of insomnia in the acute, subacute, and chronic phases were 40.7%, 42.6%, and 35.9% (95% CIs, 31.8–50.3, 31.7–54.1, and 28.6–44.0), respectively, when evaluating self-reported insomnia symptoms by means of questionnaires [32]. In this study, the prevalence of poor sleep quality in patients one month after stroke was 58.68%. The results obtained for the PSQI score suggest that IS patients from the PSQ group were more likely to experience sleep disturbance and exhibit higher sleep latency, sleep duration, more use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction when compared with the GSQ group on average.
Women and older IS patients were more likely to develop sleep disorders in our study. Since the age of stroke onset coincides with the age of perimenopause in women, fluctuating or decreasing estrogen levels in women with IS can indirectly affect the sleep–wake cycle, altering sleep patterns and leading to sleep disorders [33,34]. Some studies have found that sleep disorders are common in patients with a high degree of neurological deficits [35]. Kim et al. [9] found a significant association between functional status (mRS) and sleep quality, insomnia, and excessive daytime sleepiness. However, our study did not find differences in NIHSS scores or BI scores between the GSQ and PSQ groups. The discrepancy between our results and those of Kim et al. may be related to the selection of assessment methods and evaluation indicators.
An important finding of our study was that IS patients from the PSQ group also had lower cognitive function scores compared with the GSQ group. The pathway of influence from cognitive function to sleep quality involved depression. Our findings are consistent with prospective data from 2474 older white women followed for 15 years showing that cognitive decline is associated with sleep disturbance in nondemented community-dwelling older women [36]. When patients with IS have poor cognitive function, they may experience a decline in memory, language function, or attention. This cognitive decline can cause a great deal of psychological stress. If a patient cannot accept cognitive decline, they may become depressed. Strong empirical evidence suggests that sleep deprivation can have serious consequences on cognitive function [37]. Neurocognitive impairments caused by poor sleep are linked to the reduced functionality of the prefrontal cortex [38]. Studies suggest that shared mechanisms underlie circadian rhythmicity and long-term memory formation [39]. The Sleep Study Group of the Italian Dementia Research Association (SINDem) conducted a multicenter study on the prevalence of sleep disturbances in mild cognitive impairment and dementia disorder patients. The study indicated that two or more sleep disturbances almost always occur in association in the same patient [40]. This suggests that there is a two-way relationship between cognitive function and sleep quality.
One of the more significant findings to emerge from our study was that depression in IS patients mediated two pathways: the pathway through which cognitive function affects sleep quality and the pathway through which anxiety affects sleep quality. This also confirms that depression is an important factor associated with sleep disorders in individuals with stroke [41]. Saper et al. [42] noted that an important but often overlooked factor affecting sleep is mood, including stress and depression, which can be the origin and pathophysiology of the predisposition to insomnia. In addition, Drake et al. [43] suggested that other personality traits related to emotion were also associated with insomnia, including neuroticism, perfectionism, and sensitivity to anxiety symptoms. In this study, depression and anxiety in IS patients significantly affected sleep quality and explained 21% of the occurrence of sleep disturbances after excluding all other factors from the study. In the final structural equation, depression played a mediating role in the effect of anxiety on sleep disturbance. All patients included in this study had experienced their first stroke. A stroke is a devastating blow to the patient and may drastically change the patient’s life and psychological status. In the first month following a stroke in particular, patients suffer from various complications caused by the stroke, including physical dysfunction. Depression and anxiety are very common in stroke patients. One study found that 31% of stroke survivors reported depression within 5 years after having a stroke [44]. Depression is associated with sleep quality at both the acute [41] and chronic [45,46] post- stroke stages. For stroke survivors, depression is significantly associated with poorer functional status and rehabilitation outcomes, which are detrimental to patient health outcomes and quality of life [47,48]. It has been confirmed that risk genes seem to have a preference for brain circuitries involved in emotion regulation. The brain tissues and cell types expressing sets of insomnia risk genes are not primarily part of the known circuitry regulating sleep but are rather part of circuitries involved in emotion regulation [49].
The latest evidence suggests that if sleep disorders are accurately diagnosed in the early post-stroke stages, appropriate treatments can be administered early on, leading to the recovery of functional impairment and the improvement of social participation. Many studies emphasize and advocate the importance of collaboration between sleep specialists, neurologists, clinicians, caregivers, and rehabilitation specialists to expand our knowledge of this field and bring a restful night’s sleep to IS patients.
There are several limitations to this study. The subjects were not tested with Polysomnography in this study. There could be unidentified sleep disorders that cannot be screened for via questionnaires. An issue that was not addressed in this study was that damaged brain areas following a stroke handle different features of sleep quality. We did not investigate the association between sleep disorders and the anatomical locations of stroke lesions. Finally, because the information was self-reported, the data were prone to information bias.

5. Conclusions

Sleep disorders are largely underestimated and do not receive sufficient attention in clinical practice. The prevalence of new-onset sleep disorders after stroke was 58.68% in this study. Sleep disturbances are significantly affected by cognitive decline and may be associated with significant psychological distress and depression. Early identification should be conducted and targeted measures should be taken to reduce depression levels in IS patients presenting with cognitive decline. As Prof. J. McKinley wrote, “when we try to encourage a good night’s sleep for our patients, perhaps we are doing them more good than we thought” [50].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N., X.L., and Y.S.; methodology, S.N. and S.W.; software, S.N. and J.M.; validation, Q.W., L.Z., and X.L.; formal analysis, S.N.; investigation, S.N., S.W., and J.M.; data curation, S.N. and J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.N.; writing—review and editing, X.L. and Y.S.; supervision, L.Z., Q.W., X.L., and Y.S.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the general project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71774117) and the Youth Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71704135).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Approval Committee of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University (Approval No. SHSY-IEC-KY-4.0/17-47/01).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. Data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sierra, C.; Coca, A.; Schiffrin, E.L. Vascular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of stroke. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2011, 13, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Y.; Cui, L.; Ji, X.; Dong, Q.; Zeng, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, C.; Liu, L.; et al. The China National Stroke Registry for patients with acute cerebrovascular events: Design, rationale, and baseline patient characteristics. Int. J. Stroke 2011, 6, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, W.; Jiang, B.; Sun, H.; Ru, X.; Sun, D.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of stroke in China: Results from a nationwide population-based survey of 480 687 adults. Circulation 2017, 135, 759–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chinese Society of Neurology Cerebrovascular Group. Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2018. Chin. J. Neurol. 2018, 51, 662–683. [Google Scholar]
  5. Thrift, A.G.; Thayabaranathan, T.; Howard, G.; Howard, V.J.; Rothwell, P.M.; Feigin, V.L.; Norrving, B.; Donnan, G.A.; Cadilhac, D.A. Global stroke statistics. Int. J. Stroke 2017, 12, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pasic, Z.; Smajlovic, D.; Dostovic, Z.; Kojic, B.; Selmanovic, S. Incidence and types of sleep disorders in patients with stroke. Med. Arh. 2011, 65, 225–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Al-Dughmi, M.; Al-Sharman, A.; Stevens, S.; Siengsukon, C.F. Sleep characteristics of individuals with chronic stroke: A pilot study. Nat. Sci. Sleep 2015, 7, 139–145. [Google Scholar]
  8. Joa, K.L.; Kim, W.H.; Choi, H.Y.; Park, C.H.; Kim, E.S.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, S.Y.; Ko, S.H.; Jung, H.Y. The effect of sleep disturbances on the functional recovery of rehabilitation inpatients following mild and moderate stroke. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehab. 2017, 96, 734–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, K.T.; Moom, H.J.; Yang, J.G.; Sohn, S.I.; Hong, J.H.; Cho, Y.W. The prevalence and clinical significance of sleep disorders in acute ischemic stroke patients-a questionnaire study. Sleep Breath. 2017, 21, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sahlin, C.; Sandberg, O.; Gustafson, Y.; Bucht, G.; Carlberg, B.; Stenlund, H.; Franklin, K.A. Obstructive sleep apnea is a risk factor for death in patients with stroke: A 10-year follow-up. Arch. Intern. Med. 2008, 168, 268–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wallace, D.M.; Ramos, A.R.; Rundek, T. Sleep disorders and stroke. Int. J. Stroke 2012, 7, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Raven, F.; Meerlo, P.; Havekes, R. The role of sleep in regulating structural plasticity and synaptic strength: Implications for memory and cognitive function. Sleep Med. Rev. 2018, 39, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dzierzewski, J.M.; Dautovich, N.; Ravyts, S. Sleep and cognition in older adults. Sleep Med. Clin. 2018, 13, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mattery, P.P.; Nelson, E.J. Sleep disturbances, obesity, and cognitive function in childhood: A mediation analysis. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2021, 5, 119–126. [Google Scholar]
  15. Guan, Q.; Hu, X.; Ma, N.; He, H.; Duan, F.; Li, X.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, H. Sleep quality, depression, and cognitive function in non-demented older adults. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020, 76, 1637–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, Y.; Wen, H.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; Luo, K.; Chang, L. The relationship between sleep disorders, anxiety, depression, and cognitive function with restless legs syndrome (RLS) in the elderly. Sleep Breath. 2022, 26, 1309–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mason, G.M.; Lokhandwala, S.; Riggins, T.; Spencer, R.M.C. Sleep and human cognitive development. Sleep Med. Rev. 2021, 57, 101472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Quinn, T.J.; Dawson, J.; Walters, M.R.; Lees, K.R. Functional outcome measures in contemporary stroke trials. Int. J. Stroke 2010, 4, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Quinn, T.J.; McArthur, K.; Ellis, G.; Stott, D.J. Functional assessment in older people. BMJ Clin. Res. 2011, 343, d4681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Quinn, T.J.; Langhorne, P.; Stott, D.J. Barthel index for stroke trials: Development, properties, and application. Stroke 2011, 42, 1146–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Buysse, D.J.; Reynolds, C.F., 3rd; Monk, T.H.; Berman, S.R.; Kupfer, D.J. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989, 28, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, X.C.; Tang, M.Q. Reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Chin. J. Psychiatry 1996, 2, 103–107. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhai, S.; Tao, S.; Wu, X.; Zou, L.; Yang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Li, T.; Zhang, D.; Qu, Y.; Tao, F. Associations of sleep insufficiency and chronotype with inflammatory cytokines in college students. Nat. Sci. Sleep 2021, 13, 1675–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ren, Z.; Xin, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, D.; Ho, R.C.M.; Ho, C.S.H. What factors are most closely associated with mood disorders in adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic? A cross-sectional study based on 1,771 adolescents in Shandong Province, China. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 728278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sun, Q.; Ji, X.; Zhou, W.; Liu, J. Sleep problems in shift nurses: A brief review and recommendations at both individual and institutional levels. J. Nurs. Manag. 2019, 27, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Sun, H.; Qin, K.; Zou, C.; Wang, H.H.; Lu, C.; Chen, W.; Guo, V.Y. The association of nighttime sleep duration and quality with chronic kidney disease in middle-aged and older Chinese: A cohort study. Sleep Med. 2021, 86, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Y.L.; Qiu, D.; Hu, C.; Ouyang, F.Y.; He, J.; Zang, D.F.; Luo, D.; Xiao, S.Y. Stressful life events and poor sleep quality: A cross-sectional survey in the Chinese governmental employees. Sleep Med. 2021, 85, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wen, H.; Zhang, Z.; Niu, F.; Li, L. The application of Montreal cognitive assessment in urban Chinese residents of Beijing. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2008, 47, 36–39. [Google Scholar]
  29. Razali, R.; Jean-Li, L.; Jaffar, A.; Ahmad, M.; Shah, S.A.; Ibrahim, N.; Din, N.C.; Nik Jaafar, N.R.; Midin, M.; Sidi, H.; et al. Is the Bahasa Malaysia version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-BM) a better instrument than the Malay version of the Mini Mental State Examination (M-MMSE) in screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in the elderly? Compr. Psychiatry 2014, 55, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zung, W.W.; Coppedge, H.M. The Evaluation of Depressive Symptomatology. A Triadic Approach. Psychother. Psychosom. 1974, 24, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, X.; Bi, H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Zu, R. Research of Sleep Disorders in Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2015, 24, 2508–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sterr, A.; Herron, K.; Dijk, D.J.; Ellis, J. Time to wake-up: Sleep problems and daytime sleepiness in long-term stroke survivors. Brain Inj. 2008, 22, 575–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Alfinito, P.D.; Chen, X.; Mastroeni, R.; Pawlyk, A.C.; Deecher, D.C. Estradiol increases catecholamine levels in the hypothalamus of ovariectomized rats during the dark-phase. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 616, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gervais, N.J.; Mong, J.A.; Lacreuse, A. Ovarian hormones, sleep and cognition across the adult female lifespan: An integrated perspective. Front Neuroendocrin. 2017, 47, 134–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khazaei, S.; Ayubi, E.; Khazaei, M. Sleep quality and related determinants among stroke patients: A cross-sectional study. Iran. J. Psychiatry 2022, 17, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yaffe, K.; Blackwell, T.; Barnes, D.E.; Ancoli-Israel, S.; Stone, K.L. Preclinical cognitive decline and subsequent sleep disturbance in older women. Neurology 2007, 69, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lowe, C.J.; Safati, A.; Hall, P.A. The neurocognitive consequences of sleep restriction: A meta-analytic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. R. 2017, 80, 586–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Killgore, W.D. Effects of sleep deprivation on cognition. Prog. Brain Res. 2010, 185, 105–129. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gerstner, J.R.; Yin, J.C. Circadian rhythms and memory formation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guarnieri, B.; Sorbi, S. Sleep and cognitive decline: A strong bidirectional relationship. It is time for specific recommendations on routine assess-ment and the management of sleep disorders in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Eur. Neurol. 2015, 74, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Karaca, B. Factors Affecting Poststroke Sleep Disorders. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2016, 25, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Saper, C.B.; Scammell, T.E.; Lu, J. Hypothalamic regulation of sleep and circadian rhythms. Nature 2005, 437, 1257–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Drake, C.L.; Pillai, V.; Roth, T. Stress and sleep reactivity: A prospective investigation of the stress-diathesis model of insomnia. Sleep 2014, 37, 1295–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Hackett, M.L.; Pickles, K. Part I: Frequency of depression after stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int. J. Stroke 2014, 9, 1017–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sonmez, I.; Karasel, S. Poor sleep quality i related to impaired functional status following stroke. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2019, 28, 104349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Davis, J.C.; Falck, R.S.; Best, J.R.; Chan, P.; Doherty, S.; Liu-Ambrose, T. Examining the Inter-relations of Depression, Physical Function, and Cognition with Subjective Sleep Parameters among Stroke Survivors: A Cross-sectional Analysis. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2019, 28, 2115–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Srivastava, A.; Taly, A.B.; Gupta, A.; Murali, T. Post-stroke depression: Prevalence and relationship with disability in chronic stroke survivors. Ann. Indian Acad. Neur. 2010, 13, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kutlubaev, M.A.; Hackett, M.L. Part II: Predictors of depression after stroke and impact of depression on stroke outcome: An updated systematic review of observational studies. Int. J. Stroke 2014, 9, 1026–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Van Someren, E. Brain mechanisms of insomnia: New perspectives on causes and consequences. Physiol. Rev. 2021, 101, 995–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. McKinley, J.; McCarthy, A.; Lynch, T. Don’t lose sleep over neurodegeneration-it helps clear amyloid Beta. Front. Neurol. 2013, 4, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Flowchart of participant enrollment.
Figure 1. Flowchart of participant enrollment.
Ijerph 20 02410 g001
Figure 2. Histogram of the seven components of the PSQI scores for GSQ and PSQ. C1: subjective sleep quality; C2: sleep latency; C3: sleep duration; C4: habitual sleep efficiency; C5: sleep disturbances; C6: use of sleeping medication; C7: daytime dysfunction; GSQ: good sleep quality (n = 219); PSQ: poor sleep quality (n = 311).
Figure 2. Histogram of the seven components of the PSQI scores for GSQ and PSQ. C1: subjective sleep quality; C2: sleep latency; C3: sleep duration; C4: habitual sleep efficiency; C5: sleep disturbances; C6: use of sleeping medication; C7: daytime dysfunction; GSQ: good sleep quality (n = 219); PSQ: poor sleep quality (n = 311).
Ijerph 20 02410 g002
Figure 3. Mediating effects of depression (SDS score) on the relationship between cognitive function (MoCA score) and sleep quality (PSQI score) and on the relationship between anxiety (SAS score) and sleep quality (PSQI score).
Figure 3. Mediating effects of depression (SDS score) on the relationship between cognitive function (MoCA score) and sleep quality (PSQI score) and on the relationship between anxiety (SAS score) and sleep quality (PSQI score).
Ijerph 20 02410 g003
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants (n = 530).
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants (n = 530).
VariablesGood Sleep Quality
(n = 219)
Poor Sleep Quality
(n = 311)
Statisticsp
Age62.15 ± 10.6364.31 ± 9.995.7060.017
BMI24.06 ± 2.9624.52 ± 2.963.1320.077
Sex, n (%)
 Male172 (78.5)205 (65.9)9.9710.002
 Female47 (21.5)106 (34.1)
Marriage, n (%)
 Married200 (91.3)279 (89.7)0.3850.535
 Unmarried/divorced/Widowed19 (8.7)32 (10.3)
Education years, n (%)
 Under primary school (≤6)17 (7.8)41 (13.2)5.3680.147
 Primary school (7–9)86 (39.3)130 (41.8)
 High school (10–12)60 (27.4)74 (23.8)
 University and above (≥13)56 (25.6)66 (21.2)
Working status, n (%)
 Employed62 (28.3)83 (26.7)0.1700.680
 Retired157 (71.7)228 (73.3)
Medical insurance, n (%)
 Yes191 (87.2)276 (88.7)0.2880.592
 No28 (12.8)35 (11.3)
Vascular risk factors, n (%)
 Drink77 (35.2)140 (45.0)5.1630.023
 Smoke73 (33.3)131 (42.1)4.1930.041
 Hypertension120 (54.8)205 (65.9)6.7020.010
 Diabetes87 (39.7)154 (49.5)4.9690.026
 Coronary heart disease26 (11.9)38 (12.2)0.0150.904
 Atrial fibrillation12 (5.5)15 (4.8)0.1140.735
 Hyperlipidemia45 (20.5)66 (21.2)0.0350.851
 Hyperuricemia13 (5.9)21 (6.8)0.1430.706
 Thyroid disease17 (7.8)26 (8.4)0.0620.804
 TIA history14 (6.4)28 (9.0)1.2000.273
NIHSS (M, IQR)3 (3)3 (3)−0.3130.754
BI (M, IQR)55 (30)55 (25)−0.4790.632
SAS32.50 ± 6.2535.26 ± 8.3417.208***
SDS36.14 ± 7.5343.29 ± 11.5164.778***
MoCA (M, IQR)22 (5)21 (8)−4.901***
*** Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level (two-tailed).
Table 2. Association between sleep quality and related influencing factors in IS patients.
Table 2. Association between sleep quality and related influencing factors in IS patients.
VariablesModel 1Model 2Model 3Model 4
βSEβSEβSEβSE
Constant6.873 ***1.2715.615 ***1.4579.300 ***1.5696.519 ***1.647
 Age0.055 ***0.0160.054 ***0.0160.036 *0.0160.0150.014
 Sex−1.335 ***0.361−1.321 ***0.258−1.249 ***0.350−0.775 *0.308
 Marriage−0.6040.551−0.6290.545−0.3810.535−0.5070.468
 EDU−0.0650.171−0.0370.1690.3210.1740.1130.153
 BMI0.1250.1760.1360.1740.2340.1740.1210.154
 Work−0.1700.119−0.1860.1190.1250.1460.0270.128
 Insurance0.0670.1880.1410.1870.1590.1990.1280.245
 NIHSS 0.2580.0710.219 **0.0700.1010.062
 BI −0.249 *0.103−0.260 *0.102−0.1200.106
 MoCA −0.204 ***0.040−0.111 **0.037
 SAS 0.087 ***0.018
 SDS 0.167 ***0.015
R20.0560.0790.1230.333
Adj R20.0490.0690.1110.322
ΔR2 0.0230.0440.210
ΔF7.765 ***6.710 ***25.939 ***81.969 ***
*** Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level (two-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed). * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).
Table 3. Direct effects of variables.
Table 3. Direct effects of variables.
ItemsEstimateS.E.tpStandardized Estimate
SDS←MoCA0.9180.092−9.973***−0.395
SDS←SAS0.1520.0552.7580.006−0.109
PSQI←MoCA−0.0800.033−2.4380.015−0.097
PSQI←SDS0.1610.01411.241***0.449
PSQI←SAS0.0930.0185.066***0.186
*** Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level (two-tailed).
Table 4. Total, direct, and mediated effects on PSQI.
Table 4. Total, direct, and mediated effects on PSQI.
ItemsβS.E.95%CIpVariance (%)
Total effect -
 PSQI←MoCA−0.2740.036(−0.334, −0.215)***-
 PSQI←SAS0.2350.040(0.165, 0.297)***-
Direct effect -
 PSQI←MoCA−0.0970.038(−0.160, −0.034)***35.4 a
 PSQI←SAS0.1860.037(0.120, 0.245)0.01579.1 b
Indirect effect -
 PSQI←SDS←MoCA−0.1770.023(−0.214, −0.139)***64.6 a
 PSQI←SDS←SAS0.0490.017(0.021, 0.079)0.00420.9 b
a: Percentage of standardized total effects of PSQI←MoCA. b: Percentage of standardized total effects of PSQI←SAS. *** Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level (two-tailed).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niu, S.; Liu, X.; Wu, Q.; Ma, J.; Wu, S.; Zeng, L.; Shi, Y. Sleep Quality and Cognitive Function after Stroke: The Mediating Roles of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2410. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032410

AMA Style

Niu S, Liu X, Wu Q, Ma J, Wu S, Zeng L, Shi Y. Sleep Quality and Cognitive Function after Stroke: The Mediating Roles of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(3):2410. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032410

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niu, Shuzhen, Xianliang Liu, Qian Wu, Jiajia Ma, Songqi Wu, Li Zeng, and Yan Shi. 2023. "Sleep Quality and Cognitive Function after Stroke: The Mediating Roles of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 3: 2410. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032410

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop