Next Article in Journal
Epidemiological Study of Foot Injuries in the Practice of Sport Climbing
Next Article in Special Issue
A Scoping Review: Mapping the Evidence for Undergraduate Concussion Education and Proposing the Content for Medical Student Concussion Teaching
Previous Article in Journal
Cleaning Products Commonly Used in Oklahoma Family Child Care Homes: Implications for Respiratory Risk and Children’s Health
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mental Resilience, Mood, and Quality of Life in Young Adults with Self-Reported Impaired Wound Healing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 7
10.3390/ijerph19074301
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Alcohol Consumption on the Heaviest Drinking Occasion and Hangovers during the First Dutch COVID-19 Lockdown

by
Agnese Merlo
1,
Noortje R Severeijns
1,
Pauline A Hendriksen
1,
Sarah Benson
2,
Andrew Scholey
3,
Johan Garssen
1,4,
Gillian Bruce
5 and
Joris C Verster
1,2,*
1
Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
2
Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia
3
Nutrition Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
4
Global Centre of Excellence Immunology, Nutricia Danone Research, 3584CT Utrecht, The Netherlands
5
Division of Psychology and Social Work, School of Education and Social Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(7), 4301; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074301
Submission received: 18 February 2022 / Revised: 1 April 2022 / Accepted: 1 April 2022 / Published: 3 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exclusive Papers Collection of Editorial Board Members in Section "Health Behavior, Chronic Disease and Health Promotion")
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The purpose of this study was to compare alcohol consumption between the heaviest drinking occasion in the period before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown (15 January–14 March 2020) and the first COVID-19 lockdown period (15 March–11 May 2020) in the Netherlands, including the presence and severity of associated hangovers. The analysis included a sub-sample from the “Corona Lockdown: how fit are you?” (CLOFIT) study, comprising N = 761 participants who reported consuming alcohol in 2020. Overall, on the heaviest drinking occasion during the first COVID-19 lockdown period a significant reduction in number of alcoholic drinks consumed on the heaviest drinking occasion, drinking duration, and estimated BAC was observed. A significant reduction was also observed for subjective intoxication and next-day hangover severity. During the lockdown period, a significant reduction in the frequency of alcohol hangovers was reported. Several age and sex differences were observed. Specifically, men consumed significantly more alcohol than women and experienced hangovers significantly more frequently, both before and during the lockdown. With regard to age, young adults (18–35 years old) significantly reduced their alcohol intake on the heaviest drinking occasion during the lockdown and also reported lower ratings of subjective intoxication and hangover severity. No significant changes were seen for individuals above 35 years old. In conclusion, the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands was associated with reduced alcohol intake on the heaviest drinking occasion and a reduction in the severity of hangovers, particularly among young male adults.

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and associated lockdowns have had a significant negative impact on mood, wellbeing, and quality of life [1,2,3]. In addition, lockdowns involved closures of bars, restaurants, and nightclubs and the cancelation of concerts and festivals, all typical places where people come together to socialize accompanied by the consumption of alcohol. As a response to lockdowns, people have adopted various behaviors to cope with the lockdown-related negative consequences, such as increased loneliness and stress. These coping strategies, amongst others, included changes in eating and sleeping patterns, daily exercise, and smoking and drinking behavior [4,5,6], and the consequences of these behavioral adaptations may either have had beneficial or negative effects on individuals’ health status and psychological wellbeing.
Studies investigating isolation in relation to infectious diseases have also shown that lockdowns have an adverse effect on psychological wellbeing and can lead to increased alcohol consumption [7,8,9]. Furthermore, studies that investigated COVID-19 lockdown effects also presented evidence of changes in weekly alcohol consumption. Specifically, it was shown that about 50% of drinkers either increased or reduced their weekly alcohol intake and the number of drinking days per week [10,11,12]. Among drinkers that increased the quantity and/or frequency of weekly alcohol consumption, there was a significant association with greater stress, reduced perceived immune fitness, and increased presence and severity of COVID-19 symptoms. These associations were not significant in drinkers that did not alter or reduce their weekly alcohol intake [10].
Research on alcohol use during the COVID-19 pandemic has focused on weekly alcohol intake but has not presented results on the heaviest drinking occasion before or during lockdown. The heaviest drinking occasion is defined as the single drinking occasion in a certain period of time on which the most alcohol is consumed. Examining the heaviest drinking occasion is important as this occasion is likely to be responsible for most negative alcohol-related consequences, such as having a hangover. In addition, in student samples it has been shown that whereas measures such as weekly alcohol consumption fluctuate in response to constantly and rapidly changing short-term academic, social, and health demands, the quantity of alcohol they consume on their weekly ‘night(s) out’ (i.e., their heaviest weekly drinking occasions) appeared to remain relatively stable [13]. For instance, students may adapt their weekly alcohol consumption prior to work submission deadlines and examinations, but not their consumption on weekly ‘nights out’. It can be questioned, however, whether these effects hold for older age groups and both sexes and whether these persist during the COVID-19 pandemic, including unprecedented changes such as lockdowns and the closure of bars and restaurants.
The alcohol hangover is the most frequently reported negative outcome of alcohol consumption [14], defined as the combination of negative mental and physical symptoms that can be experienced after a single episode of alcohol consumption, starting when the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) approaches zero [15,16]. Several studies have presented the adverse consequences linked to experiencing hangovers, including low mood, impaired cognitive performance, and impaired performance in daily activities, such as driving a car and work performance [17,18,19,20,21,22].
Various factors are associated with heavy drinking, including individual characteristics (i.e., demographics), psychological state (e.g., mood), and social environment (e.g., living situation) [23,24]. This was also found for experiencing hangovers. First of all, about 25% of drinkers report that they never experience hangovers, despite consuming large quantities of alcohol [25,26]. Second, individual differences in alcohol metabolism may impact the presence and severity of hangovers [27,28], and recently it was shown that there is no cut-off with regard to alcohol intake, but that, depending on the individual drinker, hangovers can be experienced following the consumption of even a relatively small amount of alcohol [29]. Further, sex differences have been reported in that women typically rate hangover symptoms, such as nausea and tiredness, significantly higher than men [30]. It was further found that hangover severity increases with hangover frequency [31]. However, research on hangover frequency is scarce. Studies examining age effects reported that hangover frequency declines with increasing age [32,33]. Analysis of pre-COVID-19 alcohol consumption data on the individuals that participated in the current study revealed that after correcting for the amount of alcohol consumed, both hangover frequency and hangover severity declined with increasing age [33,34]. The analysis further showed sex differences in alcohol consumption (a higher quantity and frequency in men) and found that the frequency and severity of hangovers were the greatest among younger age groups.
To date, data on alcohol hangovers during COVID-19 lockdowns have not been published. Given this gap in knowledge, the purpose of the current analysis was to compare alcohol consumption on the heaviest drinking occasion before and during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands, including the presence and severity of associated hangovers. The data were analyzed for both sexes and different age groups were compared. Based on previous findings [30,31,32,33], it was hypothesized that these variables may have a significant impact on alcohol consumption on the heaviest drinking occasion.

2. Methods

Data from alcohol consumers who participated in the ‘Corona Lockdown: how fit are you?’ (CLOFIT) study were used for the current analysis [34]. The CLOFIT study comprised an online survey among the general Dutch population 18 years and older that was completed in June and July 2020, approximately 1–2 months after the first Dutch lockdown. The survey was developed in SurveyMonkey, and participants were recruited via a Facebook advertisement. The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences of Utrecht University granted ethical approval (approval code FETC17-061), and electronic informed consent was obtained from all participants. A detailed description of the survey design and methodology can be found elsewhere [34].
Demographics considered for the current analyses included age, sex, weight, and height. Body Mass Index (BMI) was computed by dividing the participant’s weight (in kilograms) by the square of the person’s height (in meters). Alcohol consumption questions were answered for the period before the lockdown (15 January–14 March 2020) and for the lockdown period (15 March–11 May 2020). With regard to the heaviest drinking occasion within each of the two periods, the number of alcoholic drinks consumed as well as the duration of drinking (h) were reported. A graphic was shown to illustrate the drinking sizes of alcoholic drinks and how to convert these into units of alcohol. The estimated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was computed with a modified Widmark equation, taking into account sex, body weight, and total body water [35,36]. Subjective intoxication (drunkenness) was rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (totally not) to 10 (extremely drunk) [37], and next-day hangover severity was assessed on a scale ranging from 0 (no hangover) to 10 (extremely severe hangover) [38]. Finally, participants reported how many hangovers they had experienced during the previous month for both periods.
Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk NY, USA: IBM Corp.). The mean and standard deviation (SD) were computed for demographics and all drinking outcomes. These were also computed for males and females separately. Normality was checked statistically (using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) and via visual inspection. Alcohol consumption data before and during lockdown were not normally distributed and therefore nonparametric statistical tests were used. Potential sex differences were tested by applying the nonparametric Independent Samples Mann–Whitney U test. Assessments of alcohol consumption on the heaviest drinking occasion before and during the COVID-19 lockdown were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. A Bonferroni’s correction was applied (p < 0.008) to account for multiple comparisons. The analyses were conducted for the overall sample as well as age separated into age groups (Group 1 (18–25 years old), Group 2 (26–35 years old), Group 3 (36–45 years old), Group 4 (46–55 years old), Group 5 (56–65 years old), Group 6 (66–75 years old), and Group 7 (>75 years old)). The Kruskal–Wallis test, including a Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons, was used to compare the age groups. The interaction between age group and sex was computed using difference scores (Δ, during lockdown–before lockdown) with the Aligned Rank Transform test [39].

3. Results

A total of N = 761 participants reported consuming alcohol before and during the COVID-19 lockdown. The age range was 18 to 94 years old and 61.6% were women. Participant demographics are summarized in Table 1.
Alcohol consumption outcomes are summarized in Table 2. There was a significant reduction during the lockdown for all alcohol outcomes that were assessed, including the frequency and severity of reported hangovers.

3.1. Sex

Drinking behavior on the heaviest drinking occasion was analyzed separately for men (N = 282) and women (N = 469). The outcomes are summarized in Table 3.
Women reported that they consumed significantly less alcohol on their heaviest drinking occasion, both before and during lockdown. Women further reported significantly fewer hangovers per month for both periods. Other sex differences were not statistically significant.

3.2. Age

Alcohol consumption outcomes of the different age groups are summarized in Table 4 and Table 5. The results are visualized in Figure 1. In the youngest age group (Group 1, 18–25 years old), all differences between before and during lockdown assessments were significant (p < 0.0001), indicating reduced alcohol intake on the heaviest drinking occasion during the COVID-19 lockdown, with lower ratings of subjective intoxication and hangover severity. This was to a lesser extent also seen among the 26–35-year-old participants (Group 2), but after Bonferroni’s correction, not all comparisons reached statistical significance. For the older age groups, no significant differences were found in drinking behavior on the heaviest drinking occasion before and during the COVID-19 lockdown.

3.3. Interactions between Age Group and Sex

Difference scores (Δ, during lockdown–before lockdown) were computed according to sex and age group. These are depicted in Figure 2. Significant interactions between age group and sex were found for amount of alcohol consumed (p < 0.001), drinking duration (p < 0.001), estimated BAC (p = 0.011), subjective intoxication (p < 0.001), hangover severity (p < 0.001), and hangover frequency (p < 0.001). Figure 2 shows a reduction in alcohol consumption outcomes for the younger age groups (18 to 35 years old). Thus, during the lockdown they consumed less alcohol on their heaviest drinking occasion and report lower ratings of subjective intoxication and hangover severity. In contrast, for older participants (above 35 years old) no relevant differences between before and during the COVID-19 lockdown were observed for any of the alcohol consumption outcomes. In addition, the only statistically significant sex difference was found for the number of drinks consumed (p < 0.001) among 18- to 25-year-old participants.

4. Discussion

The aim of the current study was to compare alcohol consumption on the heaviest drinking occasion before and during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands, including the presence and severity of associated hangovers. The analysis revealed an overall reduction in alcohol consumption during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Specifically, the number of alcoholic drinks consumed on the heaviest drinking occasion, the duration of this drinking episode, subjective intoxication, and the corresponding estimated BAC were significantly reduced. A significant reduction was also observed in the frequency and severity of reported hangovers during the lockdown period. These effects were significant among younger adults, 18 to 35 years old, but not significant among older adults.
The previous literature has associated poorer mood (e.g., increased anxiety, stress, and depression) with heavy episodic drinking and with the use of alcohol as a negative reinforcement (e.g., to alleviate pain) [40,41,42]. In addition, lockdowns and their related stressors (e.g., frustration, boredom, and financial security) and individual differences in coping mechanisms, drinking motives, access to emotional support, and living situation may result in an increase in alcohol consumption [43,44,45].
As the COVID-19 lockdown is generally associated with loneliness, stress, and poor mood [43], it was expected that a general increase in heavy drinking would be observed, including the associated frequency and severity of hangovers during the COVID-19 lockdown. However, our results show the opposite effects, and significant changes in alcohol consumption outcomes between before and during the COVID-19 lockdown were only seen among 18- to 35-year-old participants. The data suggest that the closure of bars and restaurants and the canceling of events during the COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands had a protective effect on the episodic heavy drinking of these young adults, as the quantity of alcohol consumed, the frequency of alcohol consumption, and the frequency and severity of hangovers were significantly reduced. Recent research also suggests that our findings may be directly related to the closure of bars, restaurants, and nightclubs [46]. This Australian study [46] found a significant reduction in on-premise beer consumption when restrictions were imposed on visiting bars and restaurants, whereas no significant change in off-premise beer consumption was found during lockdown periods. Alternatively, changes in living location during the lockdown may have had an impact on the alcohol consumption of young adults. For example, White et al. reported that adolescents returning to live with their parents during a lockdown significantly reduced their daily alcohol intake compared with those that did not move back to live with their parents [44].
As expected, men consumed more alcohol than women on the heaviest drinking occasion and experienced a significantly higher frequency and severity of hangovers than women, both before and during the lockdown. These findings are in line with the general literature on alcohol consumption [47,48,49]. It is, however, important to mention that the extent of sex differences in heavy alcohol consumption varies between countries and across populations [47,48,49]. In addition, research suggests that this sex difference is rapidly declining [50,51]. Nevertheless, a statistically significant sex difference in changes in alcohol consumption outcomes during the COVID-19 lockdown was found only for the number of alcoholic drinks consumed among 18–25-year-old participants.
With regard to age, the present study showed that younger individuals (18–35 years old) significantly reduced their alcohol intake on their heaviest drinking occasion during the COVID-19 lockdown. The observation that alcohol consumption is heavier among younger age groups is in line with other studies [52,53] and is typically associated with drinking motives and contextual aspects (e.g., location, occasion, peers) that change when aging [54]. No significant changes in alcohol outcomes were seen for older participants (>35 years old). An explanation for these observations may be that younger age groups are more likely to visit bars and attend nightlife events where alcohol is consumed. Taken together, it is understandable that the observed lockdown effects on alcohol consumption were larger among younger age groups. As men consume more alcohol than women, the effects of the lockdown on alcohol consumption in young men were significantly greater than those observed among young women.
Future research should further investigate why these differences were specifically found among younger age groups, including the observed sex difference. This information could aid in the development of prevention strategies to reduce heavy drinking. Research should also continue to monitor post-COVID alcohol consumption, investigating the impact of fully reopening bars and nightlife entertainment on alcohol consumption.
The presented findings should be viewed in the context of the study’s limitations. Firstly, this study relied on self-reported retrospective data and thus responses could potentially be inaccurate. Since the assessments were made retrospectively over a period of several months, it is likely that the study outcome has been influenced to some extent by recall bias. Secondly, research relating to heavy drinking utilizes different definitions (e.g., heavy drinking, binge drinking, risky single occasion) and different measures (e.g., units or number of drinks, drink sizes). Thus, applying consistent definitions and measures is essential. In the current study, participants were provided with a description of standard serving sizes. Finally, there are several factors associated with heavy drinking and these should be taken into consideration, such as psychological states, cultural differences, and socioeconomic status. The current study aimed to identify sex and age differences associated with the first COVID-19 lockdown. However, future studies should examine the interaction with other demographics such as education level, ethnicity, health status, job type, and income.
The closure of drinking establishments (bars, restaurants, etc.) during the lockdown reduced alcohol consumption on the heaviest drinking occasion. This observation is consistent with the reduced weekly alcohol consumption of these participants that we reported elsewhere [10]. While this can be regarded as a positive effect accompanying the lockdown period, it should be noted that this is the mean outcome for the full sample under investigation. Within this sample, there is a substantial group of drinkers (about one quarter of the sample) that increased their weekly alcohol consumption during the lockdown period. While the increased consumption may have been a response to the lockdown itself, it may be that members of this subgroup increase their alcohol intake to try and mitigate the effects of negative life events more generally. This merits further investigation in contexts other than the pandemic. Further, while the reduction in alcohol consumption may be associated with positive health effects, the lockdown itself was associated with other negative health outcomes. These included significant reductions in social and psychological wellbeing, particularly among young adults [55,56]. Of note is that the observed effects on alcohol consumption are temporary and last only as long as lockdowns are enforced. Research revealed that as soon as lockdown measures were lifted, alcohol consumption patterns quickly returned to pre-COVID-19 levels [57].
Finally, an important implication of our findings is also relevant in a non-COVID context and concerns the general population as a whole. That is, the data show that a substantial number of participants consume too much alcohol per se. This group of drinkers deserves attention, and efforts should be made to reduce their alcohol consumption. Moderation of alcohol consumption has been associated with improved health and immune fitness ratings [10] and better academic functioning [57]. It should therefore be an important goal of policymakers to support prevention initiatives that aim to reduce heavy alcohol consumption and promote a healthy lifestyle.

5. Conclusions

The first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands was associated with a significant reduction in the quantity of alcohol consumed on the heaviest drinking occasion. In line with this, a significant reduction in the frequency and severity of alcohol hangovers was seen during the lockdown period. These effects were most prominent in young male adults.

Author Contributions

A.M., N.R.S., P.A.H., S.B., G.B., A.S., J.G. and J.C.V. contributed to the conceptualization, design, and methodology of the study; J.C.V. conducted the statistical analysis; A.M. and J.C.V. prepared the original draft; and all authors critically reviewed the paper and approved the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences of Utrecht University (approval code: FETC17-061).

Informed Consent Statement

Electronic informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The survey and data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Over the past three years, J.C.V. has acted as a consultant/advisor for KNMP, Mentis, More Labs, Red Bull, Sen-Jam Pharmaceutical, and Toast! J.G. is a part-time employee of Nutricia Research and received research grants from the Nutricia research foundation, Top Institute Pharma, Top Institute Food and Nutrition, GSK, STW, NWO, Friesland Campina, CCC, Raak-Pro, and EU. S.B. has received funding from Red Bull GmbH, Kemin Foods, Sanofi Aventis, Phoenix Pharmaceutical, and GlaxoSmithKline. Over the past 36 months, A.S. has held research grants from Abbott Nutrition, Arla Foods, Bayer, BioRevive, DuPont, Kemin Foods, Nestlé, Nutricia-Danone, and Verdure Sciences. He has acted as a consultant/expert advisor to Bayer, Danone, Naturex, Nestlé, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Sen-Jam Pharmaceutical and has received travel/hospitality/speaker fees from Bayer, Sanofi, and Verdure Sciences. The other authors have no potential conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Passavanti, M.; Argentieri, A.; Barbieri, D.M.; Lou, B.; Wijayaratna, K.; Mirhosseini, A.S.F.; Wang, F.; Naseri, S.; Qamhia, I.; Tangerås, M.; et al. The psychological impact of COVID-19 and restrictive measures in the world. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 283, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Elhadi, M.; Alsoufi, A.; Msherghi, A.; Alshareea, E.; Ashini, A.; Nagib, T.; Abuzid, N.; Abodabos, S.; Alrifai, H.; Gresea, E.; et al. Psychological health, sleep quality, behavior, and internet use among people during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 632496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Serafini, G.; Parmigiani, B.; Amerio, A.; Aguglia, A.; Sher, L.; Amore, M. The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population. QJM 2020, 113, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cheikh Ismail, L.; Osaili, T.M.; Mohamad, M.N.; Al Marzouqi, A.; Jarrar, A.H.; Abu Jamous, D.O.; Magriplis, E.; Ali, H.I.; Al Sabbah, H.; Hasan, H.; et al. Eating habits and lifestyle during COVID-19 lockdown in the United Arab Emirates: A cross-sectional study. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pérez-Rodrigo, C.; Gianzo Citores, M.; Hervás Bárbara, G.; Ruiz-Litago, F.; Casis Sáenz, L.; Arija, V.; López-Sobaler, A.M.; Martínez de Victoria, E.; Ortega, R.M.; Partearroyo, T.; et al. Patterns of change in dietary habits and physical activity during lockdown in Spain due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nutrients 2021, 13, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stanton, R.; To, Q.G.; Khalesi, S.; Williams, S.L.; Alley, S.J.; Thwaite, T.L.; Fenning, A.S.; Vandelanotte, C. Depression, anxiety and stress during COVID-19: Associations with changes in physical activity, sleep, tobacco and alcohol use in Australian adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jeong, H.; Yim, H.W.; Song, Y.J.; Ki, M.; Min, J.A.; Cho, J.; Chae, J.H. Mental health status of people isolated due to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Epidemiol. Health 2016, 38, e2016048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nkire, N.; Mrklas, K.; Hrabok, M.; Gusnowski, A.; Vuong, W.; Surood, S.; Abba-Aji, A.; Urichuk, L.; Cao, B.; Greenshaw, A.J.; et al. COVID-19 pandemic: Demographic predictors of isolation and quarantine and impact of isolation and quarantine on perceived stress, anxiety, and depression. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 553468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sallie, S.N.; Ritou, V.; Bowden-Jones, H.; Voon, V. Assessing international alcohol consumption patterns during isolation from the COVID-19 pandemic using an online survey: Highlighting negative emotionality mechanisms. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e044276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Merlo, A.; Hendriksen, P.A.; Severeijns, N.R.; Garssen, J.; Bruce, G.; Verster, J.C. Alcohol consumption patterns during COVID-19 lockdown and their relationship with perceived immune fitness and reported COVID-19 symptoms. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alpers, S.E.; Skogen, J.C.; Mæland, S.; Pallesen, S.; Rabben, Å.K.; Lunde, L.H.; Fadnes, L.T. Alcohol consumption during a pandemic lockdown period and change in alcohol consumption related to worries and pandemic measures. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schmits, E.; Glowacz, F. Changes in alcohol use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact of the lockdown conditions and mental health factors. Int. J. Ment. Health. Addiction 2021, 20, 1147–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jones, B.T.; Jones, B.C.; Smith, H.; Copley, N. A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users. Addiction 2003, 98, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Verster, J.C.; van Herwijnen, J.; Olivier, B.; Kahler, C.W. Validation of the Dutch Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (B-YAACQ). Addict. Behav. 2009, 34, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Van Schrojenstein Lantman, M.; van de Loo, A.J.; Mackus, M.; Verster, J.C. Development of a definition for the alcohol hangover: Consumer descriptions and expert consensus. Curr. Drug Abuse Rev. 2016, 9, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Verster, J.C.; Scholey, A.; van de Loo, A.J.A.E.; Benson, S.; Stock, A.-K. Updating the definition of the alcohol hangover. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kruisselbrink, L.D. The neurocognitive effects of alcohol hangover: Patterns of impairment/nonimpairment within the neurocognitive domain of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. In Neuroscience of Alcohol: Mechanisms and Treatment, 5th ed.; Preedy, V.R., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 391–402. [Google Scholar]
  18. Frone, M.R. Employee psychoactive substance involvement: Historical context, key findings, and future directions. Annu. Rev. Organ Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2019, 6, 273–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Van Schrojenstein Lantman, M.; Mackus, M.; van de Loo, A.J.A.E.; Verster, J.C. The impact of alcohol hangover symptoms on cognitive and physical functioning, and mood. Hum. Psychopharmacol. Clin. Exp. 2017, 32, e2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Verster, J.C.; Bervoets, A.C.; de Klerk, S.; Vreman, R.A.; Olivier, B.; Roth, T.; Brookhuis, K.A. Effects of alcohol hangover on simulated highway driving performance. Psychopharmacology 2014, 231, 2999–3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Verster, J.C.; van der Maarel, M.; McKinney, A.; Olivier, B.; de Haan, L. Driving during alcohol hangover among Dutch professional truck drivers. Traffic Inj. Prev. 2014, 15, 434–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alford, C.; Broom, C.; Carver, H.; Johnson, S.; Lands, S.; Reece, R.; Verster, J.C. The impact of alcohol hangover on simulated driving performance during a ‘commute to work’—Zero and residual alcohol effects compared. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. O’Hara, R.E.; Armeli, S.; Tennen, H. Drinking-to-cope motivation and negative mood–drinking contingencies in a daily diary study of college students. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 2014, 75, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Smit, K.; Groefsema, M.; Luijten, M.; Engels, R.; Kuntsche, E. Drinking motives moderate the effect of the social environment on alcohol use: An event-level study among young adults. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 2015, 76, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kruisselbrink, L.D.; Bervoets, A.C.; de Klerk, S.; van de Loo, A.J.A.E.; Verster, J.C. Hangover resistance in a Canadian university student population. Addict. Behav. Rep. 2017, 5, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hogewoning, A.; van de Loo, A.J.A.E.; Mackus, M.; Raasveld, S.J.; de Zeeuw, R.; Bosma, E.R.; Bouwmeester, N.H.; Brookhuis, K.A.; Garssen, J.; Verster, J.C. Characteristics of social drinkers with and without a hangover after heavy alcohol consumption. Subst. Abuse Rehab. 2016, 7, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mackus, M.; van de Loo, A.J.E.A.; Garssen, J.; Kraneveld, A.D.; Scholey, A.; Verster, J.C. The association between ethanol elimination rate and hangover severity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mackus, M.; van de Loo, A.J.E.A.; Garssen, J.; Kraneveld, A.D.; Scholey, A.; Verster, J.C. The role of alcohol metabolism in the pathology of alcohol hangover. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Verster, J.C.; Kruisselbrink, L.D.; Slot, K.A.; Anogeianaki, A.; Adams, S.; Alford, C.; Arnoldy, L.; Ayre, E.; Balikji, S.; Benson, S.; et al. Sensitivity to experiencing alcohol hangovers: Reconsideration of the 0.11% blood alcohol concentration (BAC) threshold for having a hangover. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Van Lawick van Pabst, A.E.; Devenney, L.E.; Verster, J.C. Sex differences in the presence and severity of alcohol hangover symptoms. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Verster, J.C.; Slot, K.A.; Arnoldy, L.; van Lawick van Pabst, A.E.; van de Loo, A.J.A.E.; Benson, S.; Scholey, A. The association between alcohol hangover frequency and severity: Evidence for reverse tolerance? J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Tolstrup, J.S.; Stephens, R.; Grønbaek, M. Does the severity of hangovers decline with age? Survey of the incidence of hangover in different age groups. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2014, 38, 466–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Verster, J.C.; Severeijns, N.R.; Sips, A.S.M.; Saeed, H.M.; Benson, S.; Scholey, A.; Bruce, G. Alcohol hangover across the lifespan: Impact of sex and age. Alcohol Alcohol. 2021, 56, 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kiani, P.; Merlo, A.; Saeed, H.M.; Benson, S.; Bruce, G.; Hoorn, R.; Kraneveld, A.D.; Severeijns, N.R.; Sips, A.S.M.; Scholey, A.; et al. Immune fitness, and the psychosocial and health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in The Netherlands: Methodology and design of the CLOFIT study. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2021, 11, 199–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Watson, P.E.; Watson, I.D.; Batt, R.D. Prediction of blood alcohol concentrations in human subjects. Updating the Widmark Equation. J. Stud. Alcohol. Drugs 1981, 42, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mathijssen, M.P.M.; Twisk, D.A.M. Opname en Afbraak van Alcohol in Het Menselijk Lichaam; Technical Report R-2001-19; Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (SWOV): Leidschendam, Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  37. Van de Loo, A.J.A.E.; van Andel, N.; van Gelder, C.A.G.H.; Janssen, B.S.G.; Titulaer, J.; Jansen, J.; Verster, J.C. The effects of alcohol mixed with energy drink (AMED) on subjective intoxication and alertness: Results from a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Hum. Psychopharmacol. Clin. Exp. 2016, 31, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Verster, J.C.; van de Loo, A.J.A.E.; Benson, S.; Scholey, A.; Stock, A.-K. The assessment of overall hangover severity. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wobbrock, J.O.; Findlater, L.; Gergle, D.; Higgins, J.J. The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–12 May 2011; ACM Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 143–146. [Google Scholar]
  40. Choi, N.G.; DiNitto, D.M. Heavy/binge drinking and depressive symptoms in older adults: Gender differences. Int. J. Geriat. Psychiatry 2011, 26, 860–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Choi, N.G.; DiNitto, D.M. Psychological distress, binge/heavy drinking, and gender differences among older adults. Am. J. Addict. 2011, 20, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kachadourian, L.K.; Pilver, C.E.; Potenza, M.N. Trauma, PTSD, and binge and hazardous drinking among women and men: Findings from a national study. J. Psychiat. Res. 2014, 55, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Brooks, S.K.; Webster, R.K.; Smith, L.E.; Woodland, L.; Wessely, S.; Greenberg, N.; Rubin, G.J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020, 395, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. White, H.R.; Stevens, A.K.; Hayes, K.; Jackson, K.M. Changes in alcohol consumption among college students due to COVID-19: Effects of campus closure and residential change. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 2020, 81, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cooper, M.L.; Kuntsche, E.; Levitt, A.; Barber, L.; Wolf, S. A motivational perspective on substance use: Review of theory and research. In Oxford Handbook of Substance Use Disorders; Sher, K.J., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 375–421. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vandenberg, B.; Livingston, M.; O’Brien, K. When the pubs closed: Beer consumption before and after the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Australia. Addiction 2021, 116, 1709–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  48. White, A.; Castle, I.P.; Chen, C.M.; Shirley, M.; Roach, D.; Hingson, R. Converging patterns of alcohol use and related outcomes among females and males in the United States, 2002 to 2012. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2015, 39, 1712–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wilsnack, R.W.; Wilsnack, S.C.; Gmel, G.; Kantor, L.W. Gender Differences in binge drinking. Alcohol Res. Curr. Rev. 2018, 39, 57–76. [Google Scholar]
  50. Keyes, K.M.; Miech, R. Age, period, and cohort effects in heavy episodic drinking in the US from 1985 to 2009. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013, 132, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Dwyer-Lindgren, L.; Flaxman, A.D.; Ng, M.; Hansen, G.M.; Murray, C.J.; Mokdad, A.H. Drinking patterns in US counties from 2002 to 2012. Am. J. Public Health 2015, 105, 1120–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kuntsche, E.; Kuntsche, S.; Thrul, J.; Gmel, G. Binge drinking: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychol. Health 2017, 32, 976–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kuntsche, E.; Knibbe, R.; Gmel, G.; Engels, R. Why do young people drink? A review of drinking motives. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2005, 25, 841–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Stanesby, O.; Labhart, F.; Dietze, P.; Wright, C.J.; Kuntsche, E. The contexts of heavy drinking: A systematic review of the combinations of context-related factors associated with heavy drinking occasions. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Prati, G.; Mancini, A.D. The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns: A review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies and natural experiments. Psychol Med. 2021, 51, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hendriksen, P.A.; Kiani, P.; Garssen, J.; Bruce, G.; Verster, J.C. Living alone or together during lockdown: Association with mood, immune fitness and experiencing COVID-19 symptoms. Psychol Res. Behav Manag. 2021, 14, 1947–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Merlo, A.; Hendriksen, P.A.; Garssen, J.; Bijlsma, E.Y.; Engels, F.; Bruce, G.; Verster, J.C. Transition to online education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact of changes in alcohol consumption and experiencing hangovers on academic functioning. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 19 04301 g001 550
Figure 1. Alcohol consumption outcomes according to age group. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between before lockdown and during lockdown are indicated by *. Abbreviations: BAC, blood alcohol concentration.
Figure 1. Alcohol consumption outcomes according to age group. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between before lockdown and during lockdown are indicated by *. Abbreviations: BAC, blood alcohol concentration.
Ijerph 19 04301 g001
Ijerph 19 04301 g002 550
Figure 2. Interactions between age group and sex. Difference scores (Δ, during lockdown–before lockdown) are presented. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between men and women are indicated by *. Abbreviations: BAC, blood alcohol concentration.
Figure 2. Interactions between age group and sex. Difference scores (Δ, during lockdown–before lockdown) are presented. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between men and women are indicated by *. Abbreviations: BAC, blood alcohol concentration.
Ijerph 19 04301 g002
Table
Table 1. Demographics.
Table 1. Demographics.
OverallMenWomenp-Value
N (%)761 (100%)292 (38.4%)469 (61.6%)<0.001 *
Age (year)42.3 (19.0)48.0 (19.2)38.7 (18.0)<0.001 *
Weight (kg)77.9 (16.8)85.5 (14.9)73.1 (16.2)<0.001 *
Mean and standard deviation (SD, between brackets) are shown. Significant differences between men and women (p < 0.05) are indicated by *. Abbreviations: N, number of participants.
Table
Table 2. Alcohol consumption on the heaviest drinking occasion before and during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Table 2. Alcohol consumption on the heaviest drinking occasion before and during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Alcohol ConsumptionBefore LockdownDuring Lockdownp-Value
Number of alcoholic drinks6.0 (5.7)4.9 (5.1)<0.001 *
Drinking duration (h)4.1 (2.9)3.6 (3.0)<0.001 *
Estimated BAC (%)0.08 (0.09)0.06 (0.07)<0.001 *
Subjective intoxication2.8 (3.1)2.2 (2.9)<0.001 *
Hangover severity1.7 (2.7)1.3 (2.4)<0.001 *
Hangovers per month0.6 (1.1)0.4 (1.1)<0.001 *
Mean and standard deviation (SD, between brackets) are shown. Significant differences between before lockdown and during lockdown (p < 0.008, after Bonferroni’s correction) are indicated by *. Abbreviations: BAC, blood alcohol concentration.
Table
Table 3. Differences in alcohol consumption on the heaviest drinking occasion between men and women before and during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Table 3. Differences in alcohol consumption on the heaviest drinking occasion between men and women before and during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Alcohol ConsumptionBefore LockdownDuring Lockdown
On the Heaviest Drinking OccasionMenWomenp-ValueMenWomenp-Value
Number of alcoholic drinks7.7 (7.1)4.8 (4.2)<0.0001 *6.4 (6.2) †3.8 (3.8) †<0.001 *
Drinking duration (h)4.4 (3.3)3.9 (2.5)0.1804.1 (3.4) †3.3 (2.7) †0.009
Estimated BAC (%)0.08 (0.09)0.07 (0.08)0.6470.06 (0.07) †0.06 (0.07) †0.396
Subjective intoxication3.0 (3.3)2.6 (3.0)0.1822.5 (3.1) †2.0 (2.7) †0.048
Hangover severity1.8 (2.7)1.7 (2.7)0.5971.5 (2.6)1.2 (2.3) †0.089
Hangovers per month0.8 (1.4)0.4 (0.9)0.004 *0.6 (1.4) †0.3 (0.8) †0.002 *
Mean and standard deviation (SD, between brackets) are shown. Significant differences between men and women (p < 0.008, after Bonferroni’s correction) are indicated by *. Significant differences between ‘before lockdown’ and ‘during lockdown’ (p < 0.008, after Bonferroni’s correction) are indicated by †. Abbreviations: BAC, blood alcohol concentration.
Table
Table 4. Alcohol consumption on the heaviest drinking occasion before and during the COVID-19 lockdown: a comparison among age groups.
Table 4. Alcohol consumption on the heaviest drinking occasion before and during the COVID-19 lockdown: a comparison among age groups.
Number of DrinksDrinking DurationEstimated BAC
Age Group (Age Range)NBLDLBLDLBLDL
Group 1 (18–25)2198.2 (6.5)6.0 (6.0) *5.1 (2.8)4.2 (3.2) *0.12 (0.1)0.09 (0.09) *
Group 2 (26–35)1206.8 (6.2)5.3 (4.6) *4.8 (2.9)4.1 (2.7) *0.08 (0.09) 10.06 (0.07)
Group 3 (36–45)546.3 (6.3)5.3 (5.5)4.4 (3.1)4.2 (3.6)0.06 (0.08) 10.05 (0.06)
Group 4 (46–55)884.0 (3.5) 1,23.7 (3.8) 1,23.1 (2.6) 1,22.7 (2.4) 1,20.05 (0.05) 10.05 (0.05)
Group 5 (56–65)1264.3 (4.2) 1,24.3 (5.3) 13.4 (2.9) 1,23.4 (3.3)0.04 (0.05) 1,20.05 (0.07) 1,2
Group 6 (66–75)853.9 (3.5) 1,23.5 (2.9)2.7 (1.9) 1,2,32.6 (2.0) 1,20.04 (0.04) 1,20.04 (0.04) 1
Group 7 (>75)192.8 (2.5) 1,22.9 (2.5)2.1 (1.8) 1,22.2 (1.8)0.04 (0.04) 10.04 (0.04)
Overall sample7116.0 (5.7)4.9 (5.1) *4.1 (2.9)3.6 (3.0) *0.08 (0.09)0.06 (0.07) *
Mean and standard deviation (between brackets) are shown. Significant differences between ‘before lockdown’ (BL) and ‘during lockdown’ (DL) (p < 0.008, after Bonferroni’s correction) are indicated by *. Differences (p < 0.05) between age groups, after Bonferroni’s correction, are indicated as follows: 1, significantly different from Group 1; 2, significantly different from Group 2; 3, significantly different from Group 3.
Table
Table 5. Subjective intoxication on the heaviest drinking occasion and hangover severity and frequency before and during the COVID-19 lockdown: a comparison among age groups.
Table 5. Subjective intoxication on the heaviest drinking occasion and hangover severity and frequency before and during the COVID-19 lockdown: a comparison among age groups.
Subjective IntoxicationHangover SeverityHangover Frequency
Age Group (Age Range)NBLDLBLDLBLDL
Group 1 (18–25)2194.6 (3.2)3.5 (3.2) *3.1 (3.2)2.1 (2.9) *1.1 (1.6)0.7 (1.4) *
Group 2 (26–35)1204.1 (3.0)3.3 (3.0) *2.6 (2.7)2.2 (2.8)0.7 (0.9)0.6 (1.1)
Group 3 (36–45)542.5 (2.9) 1,22.0 (2.6)1.6 (2.5) 11.3 (2.5)0.4 (0.8) 10.6 (1.2)
Group 4 (46–55)881.4 (2.1) 1,21.4 (2.4) 1,20.8 (1.8) 1,20.8 (1.7) 1,20.3 (0.6) 1,20.3 (0.7) 1,2
Group 5 (56–65)1261.1 (1.8) 1,21.0 (1.9) 1,20.4 (1.1) 1,2,30.4 (1.4) 1,20.2 (0.7) 1,20.2 (0.7) 1,2
Group 6 (66–75)850.8 (1.8) 1,2,30.8 (1.8) 1,20.2 (0.9) 1,2,30.3 (0.9) 1,20.1 (0.4) 1,20.1 (0.4) 1,2
Group 7 (>75)190.2 (0.4) 1,20.2 (0.4) 1,20.2 (0.4) 1,20.1 (0.3) 1,20.1 (0.3) 1,20.1 (0.2) 1,2
Overall sample7112.8 (3.1)2.2 (2.9) *1.7 (2.7)1.3 (2.4) *0.6 (1.1)0.4 (1.1) *
Mean and standard deviation (between brackets) are shown. Significant differences between ‘before lockdown’ (BL) and ‘during lockdown’ (DL) (p < 0.008, after Bonferroni’s correction) are indicated by *. Differences (p < 0.05) between age groups, after Bonferroni’s correction, are indicated as follows: 1, significantly different from Group 1; 2, significantly different from Group 2; 3, significantly different from Group 3.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Merlo, A.; Severeijns, N.R.; Hendriksen, P.A.; Benson, S.; Scholey, A.; Garssen, J.; Bruce, G.; Verster, J.C. Alcohol Consumption on the Heaviest Drinking Occasion and Hangovers during the First Dutch COVID-19 Lockdown. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074301

AMA Style

Merlo A, Severeijns NR, Hendriksen PA, Benson S, Scholey A, Garssen J, Bruce G, Verster JC. Alcohol Consumption on the Heaviest Drinking Occasion and Hangovers during the First Dutch COVID-19 Lockdown. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(7):4301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Merlo, Agnese, Noortje R Severeijns, Pauline A Hendriksen, Sarah Benson, Andrew Scholey, Johan Garssen, Gillian Bruce, and Joris C Verster. 2022. "Alcohol Consumption on the Heaviest Drinking Occasion and Hangovers during the First Dutch COVID-19 Lockdown" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 7: 4301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074301

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop