Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer
Abstract
:1. Introduction: Before the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) Trial
2. The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) Trial
3. After the LACC Trail
4. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landoni, F.; Colombo, A.; Milani, R.; Placa, F.; Zanagnolo, V.; Mangioni, C. Randomized study between radical surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: 20-year update. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 28, e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, P.A.; Jhingran, A.; Oaknin, A.; Denny, L. Cervical cancer. Lancet 2019, 393, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landoni, F.; Maneo, A.; Zapardiel, I.; Zanagnolo, V.; Mangioni, C. Class I versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer. A prospective randomized study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 38, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raspagliesi, F.; Bogani, G. Radical surgery for cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 1198–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatla, N.; Aoki, D.; Sharma, D.N.; Sankaranarayanan, R. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2021, 155 (Suppl. 1), 28–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cibula, D.; Pötter, R.; Planchamp, F.; Avall-Lundqvist, E.; Fischerova, D.; Haie Meder, C.; Köhler, C.; Landoni, F.; Lax, S.; Lindegaard, J.C.; et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Cervical Cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2018, 28, 641–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cervical Cancer (Version I.2018); National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Shah, C.A.; Beck, T.; Liao, J.B.; Giannakopoulos, N.V.; Veljovich, D.; Paley, P. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 28, e82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ditto, A.; Martinelli, F.; Bogani, G.; Gasparri, M.L.; Di Donato, V.; Zanaboni, F.; Lorusso, D.; Raspagliesi, F. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: A comparison with open surgical operations. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 41, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, T.; Feng, Y.; Huang, Q.; Wan, T.; Liu, J. Prognostic and Safety Roles in Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 2015, 25, 990–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, Y.Z.; Deng, L.; Xu, H.C.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, Z.Q. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramirez, P.T.; Frumovitz, M.; Pareja, R.; Lopez, A.; Vieira, M.; Ribeiro, R.; Buda, A.; Yan, X.; Shuzhong, Y.; Chetty, N.; et al. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1895–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Casarin, J.; Bogani, G.; Multinu, F.; Mariani, A.; Abu-Rustum, N.R.; Ghezzi, F.; Ramirez, P.T. Paradigm shifts in gynecologic oncology. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2021, 31, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obermair, A.; Asher, R.; Pareja, R.; Frumovitz, M.; Lopez, A.; Moretti-Marques, R.; Rendon, G.; Ribeiro, R.; Tsunoda, A.; Behan, V.; et al. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 222, 249.e1–249.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frumovitz, M.; Obermair, A.; Coleman, R.L.; Pareja, R.; Lopez, A.; Ribero, R.; Isla, D.; Rendon, G.; Bernardini, M.Q.; Buda, A.; et al. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): A secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melamed, A.; Margul, D.J.; Chen, L.; Keating, N.L.; Del Carmen, M.G.; Yang, J.; Seagle, B.L.; Alexander, A.; Barber, E.L.; Rice, L.W.; et al. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1905–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nitecki, R.; Ramirez, P.T.; Frumovitz, M.; Krause, K.J.; Tergas, A.I.; Wright, J.D.; Rauh-Hain, J.A.; Melamed, A. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2020, 6, 1019–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Yu, J.; Zhao, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, H. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Results in Higher Recurrence Rate Versus Open Abdominal Surgery for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients with Tumor Size Less Than 2 Centimeter: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 683231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campos, L.S.; Limberger, L.F.; Stein, A.T.; Caldas, J.M. Survival after Laparoscopic versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2021, 22, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SGO. Recommendation. Cervical Cancer. Surgery. 2019. Available online: https://www.sgo.org (accessed on 30 July 2022).
- Abu-Rustum, N.R.; Yashar, C.M.; Bean, S.; Bradley, K.; Campos, S.M.; Chon, H.S.; Chu, C.; Cohn, D.; Crispens, M.A.; Damast, S.; et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2020. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2020, 18, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewicki, P.J.; Basourakos, S.P.; Qiu, Y.; Hu, J.C.; Sheyn, D.; Hijaz, A.; Shoag, J.E. Effect of a Randomized, Controlled Trial on Surgery for Cervical Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1669–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kohut, A.Y.; Kuhn, T.; Conrad, L.B.; Chua, K.J.; Abuelafiya, M.; Gordon, A.N.; Flowers, L.; Orfanelli, T.; Blank, S.; Khanna, N. Thirty-day Postoperative Adverse Events in Minimally Invasive versus Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2022, 29, 840–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bogani, G.; Di Donato, V.; Muzii, L.; Casarin, J.; Ghezzi, F.; Malzoni, M.; Greggi, S.; Landoni, F.; Bazzurini, L.; Zanagnolo, V.; et al. Assessing the role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2022, 275, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bogani, G.; Di Donato, V.; Scambia, G.; Landoni, F.; Ghezzi, F.; Muzii, L.; Bendetti Painici, P.; Raspagliesi, F.; The investigator of the Italian Gynecological Cancer Study Group. Practice patterns and 90-day treatment-related morbidity in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2022; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klapdor, R.; Hertel, H.; Hillemanns, P.; Röttger, M.; Soergel, P.; Kuehnle, E.; Jentschke, M. Peritoneal contamination with ICG-stained cervical secretion as surrogate for potential cervical cancer tumor cell dissemination: A proof-of-principle study for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2019, 98, 1398–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fader, A.N. Surgery in Cervical Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1955–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chacon, E.; Manzour, N.; Zanagnolo, V.; Querleu, D.; Núñez-Córdoba, J.M.; Martin-Calvo, N.; Căpîlna, M.E.; Fagotti, A.; Kucukmetin, A.; Mom, C.; et al. SUCCOR cone study: Conization before radical hysterectomy. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2022, 32, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogani, G.; Ditto, A.; Chiappa, V.; Pinelli, C.; Sonetto, C.; Raspagliesi, F. Primary conization overcomes the risk of developing local recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2020, 151, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casarin, J.; Bogani, G.; Papadia, A.; Ditto, A.; Pinelli, C.; Garzon, S.; Donadello, N.; Laganà, A.S.; Cromi, A.; Mueller, M.; et al. Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2021, 28, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogani, G.; Ghezzi, F.; Chiva, L.; Gisone, B.; Pinelli, C.; Dell’Acqua, A.; Casarin, J.; Ditto, A.; Raspagliesi, F. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: A propensity-matched analysis. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2020, 30, 987–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.J.; Kong, T.W.; Kim, T.; Lee, M.; Choi, C.H.; Shim, S.H.; Yim, G.W.; Lee, S.; Lee, E.J.; Lim, M.C.; et al. Safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery using an endoscopic stapler for inhibiting tumour spillage of cervical malignant neoplasms evaluating survival (SOLUTION): A multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial protocol. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiva, L.; Zanagnolo, V.; Querleu, D.; Martin-Calvo, N.; Arévalo-Serrano, J.; Căpîlna, M.E.; Fagotti, A.; Kucukmetin, A.; Mom, C.; Chakalova, G.; et al. SUCCOR study: An international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2020, 30, 1269–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martin-Hirsch, P.; Wood, N.; Whitham, N.L.; Macdonald, R.; Kirwan, J.; Anagnostopoulos, A.; Hutson, R.; Theophilou, G.; Otify, M.; Smith, M.; et al. Survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer in the UK treated with minimal access and open surgery. BJOG 2019, 126, 956–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baiocchi, G.; Ribeiro, R.; Dos Reis, R.; Falcao, D.F.; Lopes, A.; Costa, R.L.R.; Pinto, G.L.S.; Vieira, M.; Kumagai, L.Y.; Faloppa, C.C.; et al. Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2022, 29, 1151–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, I.N.; Wang, I.T.; Mu, H.Y.; Qiu, J.T.; Liu, W.M.; Chang, C.W.; Chiu, Y.H. Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leitao, M.M., Jr.; Zhou, Q.C.; Brandt, B.; Iasonos, A.; Sioulas, V.; Lavigne Mager, K.; Shahin, M.; Bruce, S.; Black, D.R.; Kay, C.G.; et al. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes. Gynecol. Oncol. 2022, 166, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NIH U.S. National Library of Medicine. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 30 July 2022).
- Zaccarini, F.; Sanson, C.; Maulard, A.; Schérier, S.; Leary, A.; Pautier, P.; Chargari, C.; Genestie, C.; Gouy, S.; Morice, P. Cervical Cancer and Fertility-Sparing Treatment. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogani, G.; Chiappa, V.; Vinti, D.; Somigliana, E.; Filippi, F.; Murru, G.; Murgia, F.; Martinelli, F.; Ditto, A.; Raspagliesi, F. Long-term results of fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019, 154, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Donato, V.; Caruso, G.; Sassu, C.M.; Santangelo, G.; Bogani, G.; Plotti, F.; Sorbi, F.; Perniola, G.; Palaia, I.; Terrin, G.; et al. Fertility-sparing surgery for women with stage I cervical cancer of 4 cm or larger: A systematic review. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 32, e83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ditto, A.; Martinelli, F.; Bogani, G.; Fischetti, M.; Di Donato, V.; Lorusso, D.; Raspagliesi, F. Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer patients: Oncologic and reproductive outcomes. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2015, 25, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bogani, G.; Di Donato, V.; Scambia, G.; Raspagliesi, F.; Chiantera, V.; Sozzi, G.; Golia D’Augè, T.; Muzii, L.; Benedetti Panici, P.; D’Oria, O.; et al. Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811641
Bogani G, Di Donato V, Scambia G, Raspagliesi F, Chiantera V, Sozzi G, Golia D’Augè T, Muzii L, Benedetti Panici P, D’Oria O, et al. Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(18):11641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811641
Chicago/Turabian StyleBogani, Giorgio, Violante Di Donato, Giovanni Scambia, Francesco Raspagliesi, Vito Chiantera, Giulio Sozzi, Tullio Golia D’Augè, Ludovico Muzii, Pierluigi Benedetti Panici, Ottavia D’Oria, and et al. 2022. "Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 18: 11641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811641