Next Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation on Mechanical and Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Gassy Coal under Different Stress Paths
Next Article in Special Issue
Urban–Rural Comparison of the Association between Unsupportive Relationships, Perceived Stress, Authentic Self-Presentation, and Loneliness among Young Adults in Taiwan
Previous Article in Journal
Interventions for Body Composition and Upper and Lower Extremity Muscle Strength in Older Adults in Rural Taiwan: A Horizontal Case Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Playground Interventions on Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity in Pediatric Populations: A Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 13
10.3390/ijerph19137871
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Predictors of COVID-19 Stress and COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance among Adolescents in Ghana

by
Emma Sethina Adjaottor
1,†,
Frimpong-Manso Addo
1,†,
Florence Aninniwaa Ahorsu
2,
Hsin-Pao Chen
3,4,* and
Daniel Kwasi Ahorsu
5,*
1
Department of Behavioural Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi AK-4944, Ghana
2
Department of Social Studies, Presbyterian University College, Akropong-Akuapem E2-0007, Ghana
3
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
4
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
5
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 11 Yuk Choi Rd Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(13), 7871; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137871
Submission received: 20 May 2022 / Revised: 23 June 2022 / Accepted: 23 June 2022 / Published: 27 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Behavior Clustering and Mental Health Outcomes in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to ravage world economies, and with its recent mutations, countries worldwide are finding ways of ramping up their vaccination programmes. This cross-sectional design study, therefore, examined the predictors of COVID-19 stress and COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among adolescents in Ghana. A total of 817 participants were conveniently selected to respond to measures on fear of COVID-19, perceived stigma from COVID-19, self-stigma from COVID-19, believing COVID-19 information, COVID-19 infection prevention behaviours, COVID-19 stress, and COVID-19 vaccination acceptance. It was found that females believed COVID-19 information and accepted COVID-19 vaccination more than males did. Moreover, there were significant relationships between the majority of the COVID-19-related variables. Furthermore, fear of COVID-19, self-stigma from COVID-19, and COVID-19 infection prevention behaviours were found to be significant predictors of COVID-19 stress. Additionally, believing COVID-19 information, danger and contamination fears (a subscale of COVID-19 stress), and traumatic stress (a subscale of COVID-19 stress) were significant predictors of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance. These findings imply that different factors influence different COVID-19 variable. Therefore, careful considerations and research should be employed by health authorities and policymakers in preparing COVID-19 information to target different age groups and for different COVID-19 purposes.

1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan, China, in 2019 and has since plagued the entire world. Due to its seriousness and pervasiveness, the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared it a pandemic in 2020 [1]. The devastating effect of this pandemic on economic activities [2,3,4], health [5,6,7,8,9,10,11], and sociocultural lifestyle [12,13,14,15,16,17] around the world is very distressing. The number of COVID-19 cases keeps increasing, with the current global infection being over 513 million cases and fatalities over 6.2 million as of 5 May 2022 [18]. In Ghana, the situation is not significantly different. Ghana has over 161,000 confirmed cases with 1445 fatalities as of 2 May 2022 [19]. This has had varied inimical effects on the Ghanaian population, especially among adolescents.
Adolescence is a transitional stage from childhood to adulthood [20]. Hence, it is known to be a stage of physical and psychological turmoil where adolescents strive to fit into adult roles according to societal rules and norms. The stress faced by adolescents during this transition may, unfortunately, lead to physical and mental health challenges [21,22]. Therefore, most societies were very concerned with the physical and mental health of adolescents as most interventional programmes were halted due to the emergence of COVID-19. That is, COVID-19 preventive strategies implemented to mitigate the spread of the virus, such as lockdowns, quarantines, and physical distancing, also implied that most face-to-face contacts and actual programmes had to be cancelled [23]. This strengthened the concerns that COVID-19 may contribute to the worsening mental health conditions of adolescents [23,24,25,26,27]. Even those who were healthy before COVID-19 were reported to have increased symptoms of depression and anxiety [28,29]. Furthermore, adolescents’ perceived stress from COVID-19 was associated with mental health problems (e.g., depression and sleep disorders) and other COVID-19-related variables such as fear of COVID-19 [30,31,32]. Other studies have also examined the relationships between some COVID-19-related variables [33,34,35]. Therefore, it can be deduced that COVID-19-related variables such as fear of COVID-19, believing COVID-19 information, and COVID-19 stress may be related to each other.
During the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, lockdowns, quarantines, physically distancing, and hand-washing were used as interim preventive measures to curb the spread of the virus [36,37,38]. These preventive actions, especially quarantine and physically distancing, by nature suggest the dangerousness of and fear for COVID-19 and the need to identify and withdraw from individuals infected with it. This may inadvertently taint the image and personality of such individuals even after being treated, which may further lead to stigmatisation and discrimination without proper education on COVID-19 [39,40,41]. That is, COVID-19 quarantined individuals are more likely to experience stigmatisation and discrimination, which may lead to further stress and mental health conditions [39,40,41]. Therefore, it can be deduced that adolescents may suffer in many different ways due to fake news on COVID-19, inappropriate reportage of COVID-19 issues, and the implementation of preventive measures of COVID-19 (e.g., lockdowns and quarantines). Studies on COVID-19 stigma among adolescents are inconsistent at this point [39,42,43], although it has been associated with knowledge of COVID-19 [44]. Unfortunately, these preventive measures persist as the most effective means of combating the spread of COVID-19 even after vaccinating against the virus.
The high infection and fatality rates of COVID-19 were met with accelerated development, approval, and production of its vaccines [45]. There are about 10 approved vaccines [46], with 197 vaccines at the stage of preclinical development and 154 under clinical development stages [47]. So far, 5.13 billion people have been partially vaccinated and 4.63 billion fully vaccinated (as recommended by the vaccine manufacturer) worldwide [18] as of 5 May 2022. In Ghana, there are about 9.79 million partially vaccinated and 6.12 million fully vaccinated individuals out of the 22.9 million target population [19]. With highly virulent strains of COVID-19 emerging, there has been the call to fully vaccinate all citizens, if possible. Unfortunately, in Ghana, COVID-19 vaccines were only approved for use among those aged above 15 years on 20 January 2022 [48], which covers adolescents in senior high schools (~15–17 years) but not those in junior high schools (~12–14 years). Parents, therefore, arranged for the vaccination for their wards either in the community or at school. As actual classes resumed immediately after the official announcement of vaccination of older adolescents, it is to be expected that the unvaccinated adolescents may have higher fears of contracting COVID-19 while those who contracted COVID-19 may be burdened with stigmatisation. These issues may affect their mental health and consequently affect their academic performance. Hence, school teachers and health professionals (e.g., nurses and mental health professionals) should have to monitor students’ behaviour so as to swiftly intervene to mitigate these challenges.
Researchers and healthcare professionals are also examining ways of encouraging and educating people to vaccinate themselves. Measurement scales have been developed to assess COVID-19 vaccination acceptance [49,50,51,52], which have helped researchers to objectively examine COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in various countries. Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccinations seem to be wide and varied, from external factors such as the culture, political governance, gross domestic product, and inter-country relationships [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61] to internal or personal factors such as age, sex, educational levels, profession, and lifestyle behaviours [53,54,56,57,58,61,62]. For instance, previous studies have reported sex differences in COVID-19 attitudes and behaviours [63,64], leading to sex differences in COVID-19 infection [65], although other studies revealed contradictory findings on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance [61,66,67]. Due to the varied nature of the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination acceptance, it may be necessary that countries examine the specific factors influencing their citizens’ COVID-19 vaccination acceptance as well as different age groups, such as adolescents.
This study focuses on some mental health challenges faced by adolescents due to the emergence of COVID-19 and factors that might influence their willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccine or otherwise. Considering the paucity of findings on sex differences in some COVID-19-related variables [68], this study also examines sex differences. Specifically, this study attempts to fill in the research gaps on some COVID-19-related variables such as fear of COVID-19, perceived stigma from COVID-19, self-stigma from COVID-19, believing COVID-19 information, COVID-19 infection prevention behaviours, COVID-19 stress, and COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among adolescents in Ghana. Therefore, this study examined (i) whether there is a significant difference between males and females on COVID-19-related variables, (ii) whether there are significant relationships between these COVID-19 variables, (iii) the factors that predict COVID-19 stress among these adolescents, (iv) the factors that predict COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among these adolescents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants and Procedure

The Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) ethics committee (IRB ref: CHRPE/AP/203/22) approved this cross-sectional design study. The researchers conveniently selected two junior high schools and two senior high schools in the Kumasi metropolis. After the schools agreed to assist with the study, convenient dates were set for the data collection. Four different dates were agreed for the four schools. On the set date, the researchers with their research assistants (RAs) visited the classrooms of the students, informed them about the study, and provided an assent/consent form, after they were introduced to the students by a representative (e.g., assistant headmaster) of the school. All students who signed their assent/consent form were given the questionnaire package to complete. That is, guardians (e.g., housemasters/headmistresses and academic head) signed the consent forms for students below 18 years while the students signed their assent form. The students were assisted by trained RAs to handle ambiguous items during the completion of the questionnaires. Out of a total of 1100 participants who conveniently volunteered to participate in this study, 817 (74.27% response rate) completed the questionnaire. The students were not pre-informed about the study or the day of data collection. A single day was used to collect the data from each school. Fortunately, the classes visited were mostly full, especially in the senior high schools, while a few students were absent in the junior high schools. The total absentee rate was about 0.015%. All data collection procedures were executed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and adhered to ethical principles such as confidentiality, anonymity, and the right to withdraw without any repercussions. The participants received pens embossed with “School of Medicine, KNUST” as token of appreciation and were also thanked for participating in this study. They were also debriefed after the data collection.

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Demographic Characteristics

The first section of the questionnaire solicited participants’ age, sex, educational status, accommodation status, religion, and COVID-19 infection and hospitalization.

2.2.2. Fear of COVID-19

The fear of COVID-19 was assessed using a seven-item Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S). The items of FCV-19S were responded to using a five-point Likert-type scale (strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agree = 5). Its total score (summation of individual response items) ranges from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating higher levels of fear of COVID-19. One of the sample items is “I am most afraid of corona”. It has acceptable psychometric properties [69]. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this study was 0.814.

2.2.3. Perceived Stigma from COVID-19

The perceived stigma from COVID-19 was assessed using an eight-item Perceived Stigma Scale from COVID-19 (PSSC). The PSSC was rated on a binary response scale (yes = 1 or no = 0). All the responses were added together to get a total score. Hence, higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stigma. One of its sample items is “People act as if I am dishonest”. It has acceptable psychometric properties [70]. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this study was 0.872.

2.2.4. Self-Stigma from COVID-19

The self-stigma from COVID-19 was assessed using a nine-item Self-Stigma Scale from COVID-19 (SSSC). The SSSC was rated on a four-point Likert-type scale (strongly disagree =1 to strongly agree = 4). Hence, the responses of participants were averaged together to produce a mean score. A cut-off score of 2.5 may be used to divide participants into a high or low level of self-stigma. One of the sample items is “I feel uncomfortable because I have suspicious symptoms of COVID-19”. It has acceptable psychometric properties [70]. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this study was 0.905.

2.2.5. Belief in COVID-19 Information

Belief in COVID-19 information was assessed using a six-item Believing COVID-19 Information Scale (BCIS). The BCIS was rated on a five-point Likert scale (1  =  strongly disbelieve to 5  =  strongly believe). All the responses were added together to generate a total score. A higher score on the BCIS indicates a higher level of belief in the provided COVID-19 information. One of the sample items is “How much do you believe in COVID-19 information on television”. It has acceptable psychometric properties [71]. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this study was 0.780.

2.2.6. COVID-19 Infection Prevention Behaviours

The COVID-19 infection prevention behaviours were assessed using a five-item Preventive COVID-19 Infection Behaviours Scale (PCIBS). The PCIBS was developed based on the preventive behaviours recommended by the World Health Organization Q&A on coronaviruses (COVID-19) [72]. That is, WHO advised individuals to engage in these behaviours to avoid COVID-19 infection. These infection prevention behaviours are made up of five items, which were responded to on a five-point Likert scale (1 = almost never to 5 = almost always). These responses were added together to generate a total score. A higher score on the PCIBS indicates performing preventive behaviours more frequently. One of the sample items is “How often do you stay home when you feel unwell”. It has acceptable psychometric properties [71]. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this study was 0.707.

2.2.7. COVID-19 Stress

The COVID-19 stress was assessed using a 36-item COVID-19 Stress Scale (CSS). It basically measures COVID-19-related distress, which is made up of five subscales including COVID-19-related danger and contamination fears (12 items), fears of socio-economic consequences (six items), xenophobia (six items), traumatic stress symptoms about COVID-19 (six items), and compulsive checking and reassurance seeking (six items). The CSS was rated on a five-point Likert scale (0 = not at all/never to 4 = extremely/almost always). Participants’ responses were averaged to get an overall mean score. Higher mean scores indicate higher levels of COVID-19-related distress, as well as for the respective subscales. It has acceptable psychometric properties [73]. One of the sample items is “I am worried about catching the virus”. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this study was 0.946, and 0.848 to 0.886 for the subscales.

2.2.8. COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance

The COVID-19 vaccination acceptance was assessed using 12-item Motors of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance (MoVac-COVID19). The items of the MoVac-COVID19 were rated on a 7-point Likert scale response format (strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agree = 7). The responses were summed up to get a total score, with a higher score indicating a higher level of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. The MoVac-COVID19 has acceptable psychometric properties [49,50,51,52]. One of the sample items is “It is important that I get the COVID-19 jab”. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this study was 0.650.

2.3. Data Analysis

The demographic information of participants was presented using descriptive statistics such as means and standard deviations (M ± SD), and frequencies with their respective percentages. An independent t test was also used to test the significant difference between males and females on the various COVID-19 variables. Furthermore, relationships between all COVID-19 variables were examined using Pearson r. In addition, two hierarchical linear regression models were used to examine the factors that predict COVID-19 stress and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among adolescents in Ghana after controlling for demographic characteristics (i.e., age, sex, educational level, accommodation status, and religion). The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 23 software for Microsoft Windows (Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp). The level of significance was set at 0.05.

3. Results

The participants (n = 817) of this study had a mean age of 16.10 (SD = 1.68) years, with the majority being males (54.7%), in senior high school (61.1%), in a boarding house accommodation (53.6%), and Christians (92.4%). In addition, only seven (0.9%) of the participants had had a COVID-19 infection, and four (0.5%) were hospitalized because of COVID-19 infection (see Table 1).
Table 2 shows differences between males and females on the various COVID-19 variables. The findings indicate that females (M ± SD, 20.78 ± 4.53) have significantly higher scores on believing COVID-19 information (t(815) = 2.312, p = 0.021) than those of their male counterparts (19.91 ± 5.88). Moreover, females (56.38 ± 12.55) have significantly higher scores on COVID-19 vaccination acceptance (t(815) = 2.447, p = 0.015) than those of their male counterparts (54.38 ± 10.77). Even though there is no significant between-group difference on the general COVID-19 stress scores (t(815) = 0.012, p = 0.991), at the subscale level, males (1.04 ± 0.97 and 1.59 ± 1.09, respectively) have significantly higher scores on traumatic stress (t(815) = −4.012, p < 0.001) and compulsive checking (t(815) = −1.964, p = 0.050) compared to their female counterparts (0.78 ± 0.83 and 1.44 ± 1.01, respectively). All the other between-group comparisons are not significant.
Table 3 shows the relationships between all of the COVID-19-related variables used in this study. The findings indicate that there are significant positive relationships (r = 0.098–0.912, p < 0.05) between all the variables except between (i) perceived stigma from COVID-19 and believing COVID-19 information, and preventive COVID-19 infection behaviours, (ii) believing COVID-19 information and traumatic stress (subscale of COVID-19 stress), and (iii) COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and fear of COVID-19, perceived stigma from COVID-19, self-stigma from COVID-19, preventive COVID-19 infection behaviours, COVID-19 stress, socio-economic consequences (subscale of COVID-19 stress), xenophobia (subscale of COVID-19 stress), contamination (subscale of COVID-19 stress), and compulsive checking (subscale of COVID-19 stress). Moreover, there is a significant negative relationship between COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and traumatic stress (r = −0.090, p = 0.01).
Table 4 shows the predictive factors of COVID-19 stress and COVID-19 vaccination acceptance of the participants. Factors that significantly predict COVID-19 stress are fear of COVID-19 (standardised coefficient (β) = 0.324, p < 0.001), self-stigma from COVID-19 (β = 0.200, p < 0.001), and preventive COVID-19 infection behaviours (β = 0.102, p = 0.002), which account for 23% of all possible predictive factors for COVID-19 stress (F(12, 767) = 19.055, p < 0.001). For COVID-19 vaccination acceptance, believing COVID-19 information (β = 0.125, p = 0.001), danger and contamination fears (a subscale of COVID-19 stress, β = 0.140, p = 0.025), and traumatic stress (a subscale of COVID-19 stress, β = −0.176, p < 0.001) are its predictive factors, which account for 6.1% of all possible predictive factors (F(17, 762) = 2.910, p < 0.001). All the other factors are not significant.

4. Discussion

The present study focused on the factors associated with predicting COVID-19 stress and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among adolescents specifically in Ghana. Therefore, it sought to examine (i) whether there is a significant difference between males and females on COVID-19 variables used in this study, (ii) whether there are significant relationships between these COVID-19 variables, (iii) the factors that predict COVID-19 stress among these adolescents, and (iv) the factors that predict COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among these adolescents.
The findings revealed that females believed information on COVID-19 and accepted COVID-19 vaccination more than males did. Hence, it can be suggested that females may be more willing to accept information on COVID-19 and subsequently vaccinate against the virus. The study further suggests that males and females have different ways and/or levels of believing COVID-19 information, and so health professionals should take note of the difference in order to boost COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among both sexes. On the other hand, at the COVID-19 stress subscale levels, the study revealed that males had higher levels of traumatic stress and compulsive checking compared to their female counterparts, although there was no significant difference between the groups on the overall COVID-19 stress. This indicates that males are more likely to have nightmares, intrusive thoughts, or emotion-laden images related to COVID-19 due to either direct or vicarious traumatic exposure to COVID-19 and using maladaptive responses such as compulsive checking and reassurance seeking [73], which may exacerbate their COVID-19 stress levels. The current findings are consistent with previous studies that reported sex differences in COVID-19 attitudes and behaviours [63,64], leading to sex differences in COVID-19 infection [65], although other studies revealed contradictory findings on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance [61,66]. In sum, this study affirms that there are sex differences and that female adolescents are more likely to perceive COVID-19 as a dangerous health problem and be more prepared to comply with the available scientific preventive protocols, which may enhance the effectiveness of dealing with the pandemic.
There were significant relationships between the COVID-19-related variables used in this study with small to large effect sizes [74,75]. For instance, fear of COVID-19 related positively with all the other COVID-19 variables studied except COVID-19 vaccination acceptance. This indicates that as the levels of fear of COVID-19 increase, the levels of the other COVID-19 variables may increase and vice versa. Other important significant relationships existed as well, although there were a few that were not significant; for example, there was no significant relationship between perceived stigma from COVID-19 and believing in COVID-19 information, and COVID-19 infection prevention behaviours. Moreover, COVID-19 vaccination acceptance did not relate to fear of COVID-19, perceived stigma from COVID-19, self-stigma from COVID-19, COVID-19 infection prevention behaviours, and COVID-19 stress. These suggest that not all COVID-19-related variables directly relate to each other, especially in regard to COVID-19 vaccination. Further studies are needed to examine the factors that mediate the association between other COVID-19-related variables and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. These findings are not entirely new as some studies have also examined and established similar relationships between some COVID-19-related variables [32,33,34,35,44].
Further analysis revealed that fear of COVID-19, self-stigma from COVID-19, and COVID-19 infection prevention behaviours were the significant predictors of COVID-19 stress. In other words, increased levels of fear of COVID-19, self-stigma from COVID-19, and COVID-19 infection prevention behaviours may lead to higher COVID-19 stress levels among adolescents in Ghana. In as much as some level of fear of COVID-19 is needed to help with mitigating the pandemic, higher levels of fear of COVID-19 may be detrimental to the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic as they may lead to COVID-19-related distress among the adolescents. In addition, higher levels of self-stigma from COVID-19 may impair self-motivation, which may lead to extra stress on individuals to comply with COVID-19 infection prevention behaviours protocols. It is also noteworthy that stress is capable of further triggering other health conditions [22]. Therefore, health professionals should take into consideration all these factors when educating citizens on COVID-19 and its preventive measures. Parents and teachers may assist in properly informing adolescents or students on issues of COVID-19 and mitigating their COVID-19 stress. To the best of the researchers’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine COVID-19-related variables that influence COVID-19 stress among adolescents. A study among healthy adults and people with schizophrenia revealed a significant positive association between fear of COVID-19 and COVID-19 stress [35]. A closely related study that examined predictive factors of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) revealed that stigma was not able to predict PTSD, which is contrary to this study’s finding [70].
In addition, believing in COVID-19 information, danger and contamination fears, and traumatic stress (both being subscales of COVID-19 stress) were significant predictors of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance. It is reassuring to know that information on COVID-19 influences one’s acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination. That is, good, appropriate, and credible information on COVID-19 may influence people to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. Previous studies have also emphasized the usefulness of accurate information and education for COVID-19 vaccination [34,56,58]. Among countries in the West African region, it was revealed that knowing the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines increased the willingness to vaccinate among adults [67]. Moreover, danger and contamination fears as a subscale of COVID-19 stress influenced adolescents’ willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. This shows that appropriate levels of danger and contamination fears may be imbued into information on COVID-19 vaccination by health professionals and educators to help influence adolescents’ acceptance of vaccination. In fact, a previous study revealed that danger and contamination concerning COVID-19, irrespective of the severity (i.e., mild, moderate, and severe), positively influenced COVID-19 vaccination intent [62]. Moreover, traumatic stress, another subscale of COVID-19 stress, was found to negatively predict COVID-19 vaccination acceptance. That is, intrusive thoughts or nightmares of the COVID-19 pandemic due to the direct and/or vicarious exposure to disturbing images from media sources may negatively influence adolescents’ willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. This is consistent with a previous study that revealed that negative thoughts about the COVID-19 vaccine negatively influence vaccination [34]. Therefore, extreme caution should be exercised in showing distressing and gruesome images on COVID-19 to the general public and especially adolescents. In extreme cases where distressing and gruesome images are to be shown, viewers should be cautioned ahead of the presentation with emotionally sensitive images masked as much as possible.

Limitations

This study has some limitations. A cross-sectional design was used for this study, which implies that only associations among variables can be inferred and not causation. Therefore, readers and health professionals should take note of this and apply the findings appropriately. Longitudinal studies may also be conducted to strengthen these findings. Furthermore, the participants used are adolescents and so the findings may not reflect the views of the adult population. Future studies may examine adults on these variables so as to make the findings generalizable for all age groups of the population. In addition, self-report measures were used to gather the data and this may be prone to social desirability bias. Nevertheless, the measures put in place during data collection (e.g., adequate information on the study, confidentiality, and anonymity) and the robust psychometric properties of the measures suggest that the data have an appreciable degree of trustworthiness.

5. Conclusions

The present cross-sectional study revealed that females believed information on COVID-19 and accepted COVID-19 vaccination more than males did. Males, on the other hand, had higher levels of traumatic stress and compulsive checking compared to their female counterparts. Moreover, there were significant relationships between the majority of the COVID-19-related variables. Furthermore, fear of COVID-19, self-stigma from COVID-19, and COVID-19 infection prevention behaviours were found to be the significant predictors of COVID-19 stress. In addition, believing in COVID-19 information, danger and contamination fears, and traumatic stress (both being subscales of COVID-19 stress) were the significant predictors of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance. These findings imply that different factors influence different COVID-19 variable. Therefore, careful considerations and research should be employed by clinicians, health communicators, researchers, and policymakers in preparing COVID-19 information so as to target different age groups and for different COVID-19 purposes. Finally, parents and guardians have greater roles to play in guiding their adolescents in making appropriate COVID-19 vaccination decisions and in mitigating COVID-19 stress.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S.A., F.-M.A. and D.K.A.; methodology, E.S.A., F.-M.A., H.-P.C. and D.K.A.; validation, E.S.A., F.-M.A., F.A.A., H.-P.C. and D.K.A.; formal analysis, F.A.A., H.-P.C. and D.K.A.; investigation, E.S.A., F.-M.A., F.A.A., H.-P.C. and D.K.A.; resources, E.S.A., F.-M.A., F.A.A., H.-P.C. and D.K.A.; data curation, E.S.A. and D.K.A.; writing—original draft preparation, F.A.A. and D.K.A.; writing—review and editing, E.S.A., F.-M.A., F.A.A., H.-P.C. and D.K.A.; visualization, E.S.A., F.-M.A., F.A.A., H.-P.C. and D.K.A.; supervision, E.S.A., F.-M.A. and D.K.A.; project administration, E.S.A., F.-M.A. and D.K.A.; funding acquisition, E.S.A. and H.-P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Hsin-Pao Chen received funding from E-Da Hospital (grant number EDAHP111043). The other authors did not receive any external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology ethics committee (IRB ref: CHRPE/AP/203/22 and 14 April 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organisation. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19. 11 March 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 (accessed on 11 May 2022).
  2. Asante, L.A.; Mills, R.O. Exploring the Socio-Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic in Marketplaces in Urban Ghana. Afr. Spectr. 2020, 55, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gössling, S.; Scott, D.; Hall, C.M. Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 29, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nicola, M.; Alsafi, Z.; Sohrabi, C.; Kerwan, A.; Al-Jabir, A.; Iosifidis, C.; Agha, M.; Agha, R. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. Int. J. Surg. 2020, 78, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ahorsu, D.K.; Imani, V.; Lin, C.-Y.; Timpka, T.; Broström, A.; Updegraff, J.A.; Årestedt, K.; Griffiths, M.D.; Pakpour, A.H. Associations Between Fear of COVID-19, Mental Health, and Preventive Behaviours Across Pregnant Women and Husbands: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Modelling. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2020, 20, 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ahorsu, D.K.; Lin, C.-Y.; Pakpour, A.H. The Association Between Health Status and Insomnia, Mental Health, and Preventive Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Fear of COVID-19. Gerontol. Geriatr. Med. 2020, 6, 2333721420966081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fazeli, S.; Mohammadi Zeidi, I.; Lin, C.-Y.; Namdar, P.; Griffiths, M.D.; Ahorsu, D.K.; Pakpour, A.H. Depression, anxiety, and stress mediate the associations between internet gaming disorder, insomnia, and quality of life during the COVID-19 outbreak. Addict. Behav. Rep. 2020, 12, 100307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hasannia, E.; Mohammadzadeh, F.; Tavakolizadeh, M.; Davoudian, N.; Bay, M. Assessment of the anxiety level and trust in information resources among iranian health-care workers during the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019. Asian J. Soc. Health Behav. 2021, 4, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Patel, B.; Khanpara, B.; Mehta, P.; Patel, K.; Marvania, N. Evaluation of perceived social stigma and burnout, among health-care workers working in covid-19 designated hospital of India: A cross-sectional study. Asian J. Soc. Health Behav. 2021, 4, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rad, M.; Fakhri, A.; Stein, L.; Araban, M. Health-care staff beliefs and coronavirus disease 2019 vaccinations: A cross-sectional study from Iran. Asian J. Soc. Health Behav. 2022, 5, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zaroushani, V.; Khajehnasiri, F. Errors and preventive measures of health-care systems during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J. Soc. Health Behav. 2022, 5, 49–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Balanzá-Martínez, V.; Atienza-Carbonell, B.; Kapczinski, F.; De Boni, R.B. Lifestyle behaviours during the COVID-19-time to connect. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2020, 141, 399–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lippi, G.; Henry, B.M.; Sanchis-Gomar, F. Physical inactivity and cardiovascular disease at the time of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2020, 27, 906–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Van Lancker, W.; Parolin, Z. COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making. Lancet Public Health 2020, 5, e243–e244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, E.; Arledge, S. Individual characteristics and demographics associated with mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Asian J. Soc. Health Behav. 2022, 5, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prasiska, D.; MUHLIS, A.; Megatsari, H. Effectiveness of the emergency public activity restrictions on COVID-19 epidemiological parameter in East Java Province, Indonesia: An ecological study. Asian J. Soc. Health Behav. 2022, 5, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shirali, G.; Rahimi, Z.; Araban, M.; Mohammadi, M.; Cheraghian, B. Social-distancing compliance among pedestrians in Ahvaz, South-West Iran during the Covid-19 pandemic. Asian J. Soc. Health Behav. 2021, 4, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. World Health Organisation. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 7 May 2022).
  19. Ghana Health Service. COVID-19: Ghana’s Outbreak Response Management Updates. Available online: https://www.ghs.gov.gh/covid19/ (accessed on 7 May 2022).
  20. Casey, B.J.; Duhoux, S.; Malter Cohen, M. Adolescence: What do transmission, transition, and translation have to do with it? Neuron 2010, 67, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ahorsu, D.K.; Adjaottor, E.S.; Yeboah, F.A.; Opoku, Y. Mental health challenges in academia: Comparison between students of the various educational levels in Ghana. J. Ment. Health 2020, 30, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Monroe, S.M.; Simons, A.D. Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: Implications for the depressive disorders. Psychol. Bull. 1991, 110, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Loades, M.E.; Chatburn, E.; Higson-Sweeney, N.; Reynolds, S.; Shafran, R.; Brigden, A.; Linney, C.; McManus, M.N.; Borwick, C.; Crawley, E. Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2020, 59, 1218–1239.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nearchou, F.; Flinn, C.; Niland, R.; Subramaniam, S.S.; Hennessy, E. Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Singh, S.; Roy, D.; Sinha, K.; Parveen, S.; Sharma, G.; Joshi, G. Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on mental health of children and adolescents: A narrative review with recommendations. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 293, 113429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Meherali, S.; Adewale, B.; Ali, S.; Kennedy, M.; Salami, B.; Richter, S.; Okeke-Ihejirika, P.E.; Ali, P.; da Silva, K.L.; Adjorlolo, S.; et al. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Adolescents’ Sexual and Reproductive Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Abuosi, A.A.; Anaba, E.A. Barriers on access to and use of adolescent health services in Ghana. J. Health Res. 2019, 33, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cohen, Z.P.; Cosgrove, K.T.; DeVille, D.C.; Akeman, E.; Singh, M.K.; White, E.; Stewart, J.L.; Aupperle, R.L.; Paulus, M.P.; Kirlic, N. The Impact of COVID-19 on Adolescent Mental Health: Preliminary Findings from a Longitudinal Sample of Healthy and At-Risk Adolescents. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9, 622608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Addae, E.A. COVID-19 pandemic and adolescent health and well-being in sub-Saharan Africa: Who cares? Int. J. Health Plann. Manag. 2021, 36, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, Q.; Wang, Z. Perceived stress of the COVID-19 pandemic and adolescents’ depression symptoms: The moderating role of character strengths. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2021, 182, 111062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gruber, R.; Gauthier-Gagne, G.; Voutou, D.; Somerville, G.; Saha, S.; Boursier, J. Pre-pandemic sleep behavior and adolescents’ stress during Covid-19: A prospective longitudinal study. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health 2021, 15, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boursier, V.; Gioia, F.; Musetti, A.; Schimmenti, A. COVID-19-related fears, stress and depression in adolescents: The role of loneliness and relational closeness to online friends. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 2022, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alijanzadeh, M.; Ahorsu, D.K.; Alimoradi, Z.; Mahmoudi, N.; Griffiths, M.D.; Lin, C.-Y.; Liu, H.-K.; Pakpour, A.H. Fear of COVID-19 and Trust in the Healthcare System Mediates the Association between Individual’s Risk Perception and Preventive COVID-19 Behaviours among Iranians. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, P.-C.; Hung, C.-H.; Kuo, Y.-J.; Chen, Y.-P.; Ahorsu, D.K.; Yen, C.-F.; Lin, C.-Y.; Griffiths, M.D.; Pakpour, A.H. Expanding Protection Motivation Theory to Explain Willingness of COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake among Taiwanese University Students. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, Y.-R.; Chung, Y.-C.; Kim, J.J.; Kang, S.H.; Lee, B.J.; Lee, S.-H.; Lee, J.; Jung, H.-R.; Hyun, J.; Jhon, M.; et al. Effects of COVID-19-related stress and fear on depression in schizophrenia patients and the general population. NPJ Schizophr. 2022, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chiu, N.-C.; Chi, H.; Tai, Y.-L.; Peng, C.-C.; Tseng, C.-Y.; Chen, C.-C.; Tan, B.F.; Lin, C.-Y. Impact of Wearing Masks, Hand Hygiene, and Social Distancing on Influenza, Enterovirus, and All-Cause Pneumonia During the Coronavirus Pandemic: Retrospective National Epidemiological Surveillance Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e21257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lin, C.-Y. Social reaction toward the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Soc. Health Behav. 2020, 3, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Apanga, P.A.; Kamal Lettor, I.B.; Akunvane, R. Practice of COVID-19 Preventive Measures and Its Associated Factors among Students in Ghana. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 104, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ozbaran, B.; Turer, F.; Yilancioglu, H.Y.; Kose, S.; Senturk Pilan, B.; Guzel, O.; Baskol, D.; Polat, F.; Bildik, T.; Sertoz, S.R.; et al. COVID-19-Related Stigma and Mental Health of Children and Adolescents During Pandemic. Clin. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 2022, 27, 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Baldassarre, A.; Giorgi, G.; Alessio, F.; Lulli, L.G.; Arcangeli, G.; Mucci, N. Stigma and Discrimination (SAD) at the Time of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brooks, S.K.; Webster, R.K.; Smith, L.E.; Woodland, L.; Wessely, S.; Greenberg, N.; Rubin, G.J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020, 395, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Preusting, L.C.; Raadsen, M.P.; Abourashed, A.; Voeten, H.A.C.M.; Wagener, M.N.; de Wit, E.; van Gorp, E.C.M.; Doornekamp, L. COVID-19 related stigma and health-protective behaviours among adolescents in the Netherlands: An explorative study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chory, A.; Nyandiko, W.; Ashimosi, C.; Aluoch, J.; Martin, R.; Biegon, W.; Munyoro, D.; Apondi, E.; Vreeman, R. Social Stigma Related to COVID-19 Disease Described by Primary and Secondary School Teachers and Adolescents Living with HIV in Western Kenya. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 757267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Haddad, C.; Bou Malhab, S.; Malaeb, D.; Sacre, H.; Saadeh, D.; Mourtada, V.; Salameh, P. Stigma toward people with COVID-19 among the Lebanese population: A cross-sectional study of correlates and mediating effects. BMC Psychol. 2021, 9, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lurie, N.; Saville, M.; Hatchett, R.; Halton, J. Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1969–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. World Health Organisation. Status of COVID-19 Vaccines within WHO EUL/PQ Evaluation Process. Available online: https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/sites/default/files/documents/Status_COVID_VAX_02April2022.pdf (accessed on 8 May 2022).
  47. World Health Organisation. COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker and Landscape. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines (accessed on 8 May 2022).
  48. Ghana Health Service. Joint Press Release: Vaccination of Students in Senior High Schools across the Country. 20 January 2022. Available online: https://www.ghs.gov.gh/storage/publications/ghs_and_ges.pdf (accessed on 22 June 2022).
  49. Chen, I.-H.; Wu, P.-L.; Yen, C.-F.; Ullah, I.; Shoib, S.; Zahid, S.U.; Bashir, A.; Iqbal, N.; Addo, F.-M.; Adjaottor, E.S.; et al. Motors of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance Scale (MoVac-COVID19S): Evidence of measurement invariance across five countries. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 2022, 15, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chen, I.H.; Ahorsu, D.K.; Ko, N.-Y.; Yen, C.-F.; Lin, C.-Y.; Griffiths, M.D.; Pakpour, A.H. Adapting the Motors of Influenza Vaccination Acceptance Scale into the Motors of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance Scale: Psychometric evaluation among mainland Chinese university students. Vaccine 2021, 39, 4510–4515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fan, C.-W.; Chen, J.-S.; Addo, F.-M.; Adjaottor, E.S.; Amankwaah, G.B.; Yen, C.-F.; Ahorsu, D.K.; Lin, C.-Y. Examining the Validity of the Drivers of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance Scale using Rasch Analysis. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2022, 21, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ahorsu, D.K.; Lin, C.-Y.; Chen, I.H.; Ullah, I.; Shoib, S.; Zahid, S.U.; Adjaottor, E.S.; Addo, F.-M.; Pakpour, A.H. The psychometric properties of motors of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance scale (MoVac-COVID19S): A dataset across five regions. Data Brief 2022, 42, 108103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ahorsu, D.K.; Lin, C.-Y.; Yahaghai, R.; Alimoradi, Z.; Broström, A.; Griffiths, M.D.; Pakpour, A.H. The mediational role of trust in the healthcare system in the association between generalized trust and willingness to get COVID-19 vaccination in Iran. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2022, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shah, S.; Gui, H.; Chua, P.E.Y.; Tan, J.-Y.; Suen, L.K.-p.; Chan, S.W.-c.; Pang, J. Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination intent in Singapore, Australia and Hong Kong. Vaccine 2022, 40, 2949–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, K.; Wong, E.L.; Ho, K.-F.; Cheung, A.W.; Yau, P.S.; Dong, D.; Wong, S.Y.; Yeoh, E.-K. Change of Willingness to Accept COVID-19 Vaccine and Reasons of Vaccine Hesitancy of Working People at Different Waves of Local Epidemic in Hong Kong, China: Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys. Vaccines 2021, 9, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dambadarjaa, D.; Altankhuyag, G.-E.; Chandaga, U.; Khuyag, S.-O.; Batkhorol, B.; Khaidav, N.; Dulamsuren, O.; Gombodorj, N.; Dorjsuren, A.; Singh, P.; et al. Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Mongolia: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mustapha, M.; Lawal, B.K.; Sha’aban, A.; Jatau, A.I.; Wada, A.S.; Bala, A.A.; Mustapha, S.; Haruna, A.; Musa, A.; Ahmad, M.H.; et al. Factors associated with acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among University health sciences students in Northwest Nigeria. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0260672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Soares, P.; Rocha, J.V.; Moniz, M.; Gama, A.; Laires, P.A.; Pedro, A.R.; Dias, S.; Leite, A.; Nunes, C. Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy. Vaccines 2021, 9, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wong, M.C.S.; Wong, E.L.Y.; Cheung, A.W.L.; Huang, J.; Lai, C.K.C.; Yeoh, E.K.; Chan, P.K.S. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a City with Free Choice and Sufficient Doses. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Solís Arce, J.S.; Warren, S.S.; Meriggi, N.F.; Scacco, A.; McMurry, N.; Voors, M.; Syunyaev, G.; Malik, A.A.; Aboutajdine, S.; Adeojo, O.; et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1385–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Amo-Adjei, J.; Nurzhynska, A.; Essuman, R.; Lohiniva, A.-L. Trust and willingness towards COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A mixed-method study in Ghana, 2021. Arch. Public Health 2022, 80, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Delgado-Gallegos, J.L.; Padilla-Rivas, G.R.; Zúñiga-Violante, E.; Avilés-Rodríguez, G.; Arellanos-Soto, D.; Gastelum-Arias, L.J.; Franco Villareal, H.; Cosío-León, M.d.L.Á.; Romo-Cardenas, G.S.; Moreno-Treviño, M.G.; et al. Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-Sectional Study on a Mexican Population Using an Online Questionnaire (COV-AHQ). Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 728690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Galasso, V.; Pons, V.; Profeta, P.; Becher, M.; Brouard, S.; Foucault, M. Gender differences in COVID-19 attitudes and behavior: Panel evidence from eight countries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 27285–27291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pflugeisen, B.M.; Mou, J. Gender Discrepancies in SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Related Beliefs, Attitudes, and Practices. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 711460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Abate, B.B.; Kassie, A.M.; Kassaw, M.W.; Aragie, T.G.; Masresha, S.A. Sex difference in coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e040129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zintel, S.; Flock, C.; Arbogast, A.L.; Forster, A.; von Wagner, C.; Sieverding, M. Gender differences in the intention to get vaccinated against COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Public Health 2022, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Faye, S.L.B.; Krumkamp, R.; Doumbia, S.; Tounkara, M.; Strauss, R.; Ouedraogo, H.G.; Sagna, T.; Barry, A.M.; Mbawah, A.K.; Doumbia, C.O.; et al. Factors influencing hesitancy towards adult and child COVID-19 vaccines in rural and urban West Africa: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e059138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Vassallo, A.; Shajahan, S.; Harris, K.; Hallam, L.; Hockham, C.; Womersley, K.; Woodward, M.; Sheel, M. Sex and Gender in COVID-19 Vaccine Research: Substantial Evidence Gaps Remain. Front. Glob. Womens Health 2021, 2, 761511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ahorsu, D.K.; Lin, C.-Y.; Imani, V.; Saffari, M.; Griffiths, M.D.; Pakpour, A.H. The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2020, 20, 1537–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Lu, M.-Y.; Ahorsu, D.K.; Kukreti, S.; Strong, C.; Lin, Y.-H.; Kuo, Y.-J.; Chen, Y.-P.; Lin, C.-Y.; Chen, P.-L.; Ko, N.-Y.; et al. The Prevalence of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms, Sleep Problems, and Psychological Distress Among COVID-19 Frontline Healthcare Workers in Taiwan. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 705657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Chang, K.-C.; Hou, W.-L.; Pakpour, A.H.; Lin, C.-Y.; Griffiths, M.D. Psychometric Testing of Three COVID-19-Related Scales Among People with Mental Illness. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2022, 20, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. World Health Organization. Q & A on Coronaviruses (COVID-19). Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses (accessed on 30 March 2020).
  73. Taylor, S.; Landry, C.A.; Paluszek, M.M.; Fergus, T.A.; McKay, D.; Asmundson, G.J.G. Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales. J. Anxiety Disord. 2020, 72, 102232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  75. Cohen, J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 112, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Participants’ demographic characteristics (n = 817).
Table 1. Participants’ demographic characteristics (n = 817).
Mean ± SD or n (%)Missing n
Age (years)16.10 ± 1.6817
Sex
Females370 (45.3%)
Males447 (54.7%)
Education
Junior High318 (38.9%)
Senior High499 (61.1%)
Accommodation 21
Day 358 (43.8%)
Boarding438 (53.6%)
Religion 12
Christian755 (92.4%)
Moslems44 (5.4%)
Traditional5 (0.6%)
Others1 (0.1%)
COVID-19 infection 179
Yes7 (0.9%)
COVID-19 infection hospitalization 179
Yes4 (0.5%)
Table
Table 2. Sex differences on the COVID-19-related variables.
Table 2. Sex differences on the COVID-19-related variables.
Variables FemalesMalestdfp
M ± SDM ± SD
Fear of COVID-1920.17 ± 6.0619.95 ± 6.380.4898150.625
Perceived stigma from COVID-193.46 ± 2.873.19 ± 2.771.3598150.174
Self-stigma from COVID-192.20 ± 0.802.15 ± 0.761.0798150.281
Believing COVID-19 information 20.78 ± 4.5319.91 ± 5.882.3128150.021
Preventive COVID-19 infection behaviours 16.46 ± 3.7816.34 ± 4.680.3908150.697
COVID-19 stress 1.53 ± 0.801.53 ± 0.850.0128150.991
Danger and contamination1.70 ± 0.921.63 ± 0.971.0118150.312
Socio-economic consequences1.75 ± 1.211.60 ± 1.121.7998150.072
Xenophobia1.79 ± 1.131.66 ± 1.081.6018150.110
Traumatic stress0.78 ± 0.831.04 ± 0.97−4.012815<0.001
Compulsive checking1.44 ± 1.011.59 ± 1.09−1.9648150.050
COVID-19 vaccination acceptance56.38 ± 12.5554.38 ± 10.772.4478150.015
Table
Table 3. Correlation matrix of the studied variables.
Table 3. Correlation matrix of the studied variables.
1234566a6b6c6d6e7
1Fear of COVID-19-
2Perceived stigma from COVID-190.144 **-
3Self-stigma from COVID-190.286 **0.451 **-
4Believing COVID-19 information 0.276 **0.0590.184 **-
5Preventive COVID-19 infection behaviours 0.253 **0.0370.119 **0.251 **-
6COVID-19 stress 0.416 **0.183 **0.330 **0.150 **0.206 **-
6aDanger and contamination0.368 **0.200 **0.312 **0.130 **0.153 **0.912 **-
6bSocio-economic consequences 0.255 **0.127 **0.222 **0.112 **0.107 **0.795 **0.673 **-
6cXenophobia 0.320 **0.137 **0.278 **0.121 **0.130 **0.835 **0.754 **0.639 **-
6dTraumatic stress 0.378 **0.098 **0.218 **0.0450.196 **0.671 **0.512 **0.367 **0.393 **-
6eCompulsive checking 0.342 **0.127 **0.257 **0.181 **0.265 **0.706 **0.497 **0.422 **0.459 **0.534 **-
7COVID-19 vaccination acceptance0.027−0.0080.0330.145 **0.0320.0290.0600.0210.047−0.090 *0.036-
Mean20.053.312.1720.3016.401.531.661.671.720.921.5255.29
SD6.242.820.785.3364.300.820.951.171.110.921.0611.64
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table
Table 4. Factors predicting adolescents’ COVID-19 stress and COVID-19 vaccination acceptance.
Table 4. Factors predicting adolescents’ COVID-19 stress and COVID-19 vaccination acceptance.
COVID-19 StressCOVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance
BSEBp-ValueBSEBp-Value
Step 1
(Constant)1.7640.458 <0.00159.9276.441 <0.001
Sex (males)0.0060.0600.0030.923−2.0680.838−0.0890.014
Age−0.0180.029−0.0370.543−0.2020.414−0.0290.626
Education (Senior high)0.0900.1470.0540.5381.0192.0600.0430.621
Accommodation (Day)−0.0270.127−0.0160.833−1.2721.783−0.0550.476
Religion
Islamic 0.1360.1290.0380.294−3.5821.819−0.0700.049
Traditional −0.6920.370−0.0670.0621.6665.2020.0110.749
Others−0.1030.824−0.0050.900−2.76111.584−0.0090.812
Step 2
(Constant)0.0210.438 0.96148.2366.909 <0.001
Fear of COVID-190.0430.0050.324<0.001−0.0220.079−0.0120.777
Perceived stigma from COVID-190.0130.0100.0440.214−0.2290.164−0.0550.165
Self-stigma from COVID-190.2110.0390.200<0.0010.4030.6230.0270.517
Believing COVID-19 information −0.0010.005−0.0080.8050.2740.0840.1250.001
Preventive COVID-19 infection behaviours 0.0200.0060.1020.0020.0290.1030.0110.775
COVID-19 stress
Danger and contamination ----1.7140.7630.1400.025
Socio-economic consequences----−0.4300.497−0.0430.387
Xenophobia----−0.0170.602−0.0020.978
Traumatic stress----−2.2290.596−0.176<0.001
Compulsive checking----0.6870.5100.0630.178
R2 (Adjusted R2)23% (21.8%)6.1% (4%)
ΔR222.2%4.3%
ΔF44.113 ***3.496 ***
Sex, age, educational level, accommodation, and religion were adjusted in the models. *** p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adjaottor, E.S.; Addo, F.-M.; Ahorsu, F.A.; Chen, H.-P.; Ahorsu, D.K. Predictors of COVID-19 Stress and COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance among Adolescents in Ghana. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137871

AMA Style

Adjaottor ES, Addo F-M, Ahorsu FA, Chen H-P, Ahorsu DK. Predictors of COVID-19 Stress and COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance among Adolescents in Ghana. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(13):7871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137871

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adjaottor, Emma Sethina, Frimpong-Manso Addo, Florence Aninniwaa Ahorsu, Hsin-Pao Chen, and Daniel Kwasi Ahorsu. 2022. "Predictors of COVID-19 Stress and COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance among Adolescents in Ghana" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 13: 7871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137871

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop