Next Article in Journal
Dermatologic Vasculature Diseases as a Risk Factor of Subconjunctival Hemorrhage
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Undergraduate Students’ Psychological Well-Being as They Experience University Life
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mortality and Morbidity in a Population Exposed to Emission from a Municipal Waste Incinerator. A Retrospective Cohort Study

Unit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology-IFC, National Research Council of Italy-CNR, Via G. Moruzzi, 1-56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(16), 2863; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162863
Submission received: 5 July 2019 / Revised: 2 August 2019 / Accepted: 7 August 2019 / Published: 10 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Health)

Abstract

:
In the present research, we evaluated the health effects of exposure to the municipal waste incinerator (MWI) in Pisa, Italy, through a population-based cohort design. The individual exposure pattern in the area was estimated through CALPUFF dispersion models of NOχ (developed by Atmospheric Studies Group Earth Tech, Lowell, Massachusetts), used as pollution proxies of the MWI and the relevant industrial plant, and through land-use regression for NOχ due to traffic pollution. Using Cox regression analysis, hazard ratios (HR) were estimated adjusting for exposure to other sources of pollution, age, and socioeconomic deprivation. An adjusted linear trend of HR (HRt) over the categories of exposure, with the relative 95% CI and p-value, was also calculated. Mortality and hospital discharge were studied as impact outcomes. Mortality analysis on males showed increased trends of mortality due to natural causes (HRt p < 0.05), the tumor of the lymphohematopoietic system (HRt p = 0.01), cardiovascular diseases (HRt p < 0.01); in females, increased trends for acute respiratory diseases (HRt p = 0.04). Morbidity analysis showed a HRt for lymphohematopoietic system tumor in males (HRt p = 0.04). Some of the excesses are in agreement with previous evidence on the health effects of MWIs, although the observation in males but not in females, suggests a cautious interpretation. Confounding due to other sources of exposure cannot be ruled out. The evidence was considered important in the decision-making process of the waste cycle.

1. Introduction

Incineration is a waste treatment process that involves the combustion of organic substances contained in waste materials. The thermal treatment of waste generates chemical substances that are considered as a potential health hazard to humans: metals (cadmium, thallium, zinc, mercury, chrome, arsenic, lead, cobalt, manganese, nickel, and vanadium), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), fine and ultra-fine particulate, acids (fluoridric, chloridric), gases (SO2, NO2, CO), and polychlorinated products (polychlorinated biphenyls PCB, dioxins, furans). Inhalation (gases, particulate, PAHs), ingestion (PCB) and dermal contact (metals, PAH) are the recognized routes of exposure [1,2,3]. Waste incineration plants have been reported as a source of health damage to populations living in the vicinity of the plants, however, the scientific evidence is still limited due to the low number of studies carried out and as a result of various sources of uncertainty. Reviews of epidemiological studies have regarded incinerators operating in the past decades, mainly including studies with an ecological design, with exposure estimated through surrogate measures, such as distance from the plant, and often without or with inadequate control of potential confounders [2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Studies on biomarkers show that populations exposed to emissions have higher biological levels of released substances compared with less exposed populations [7,8,9,10,11].
Although various uncertainties limit the overall interpretation of the findings, there is evidence that people living in proximity to an incinerator have an increased risk of all types of cancer [12,13], including stomach, colorectal, liver, renal, pleural and lung cancer, gallbladder and bladder for men, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia, and childhood-cancer/leukemia [13,14]. Studies on incinerators in France and in Italy have suggested an increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) [15], soft-tissue sarcoma [16,17], lung cancer [18], and neoplasia of the nervous system and liver [12]. Although the studies conducted by Shy et al. [19] and Lee and Shy [20] did not show respiratory effects. Other studies have reported increases in respiratory diseases or symptoms in populations residing near incinerators [21,22,23,24] and in children [25,26]. Other epidemiological studies on incinerators have shown an excess risk of cardiovascular diseases [21,23,24,27,28] and urinary diseases [21].
Some studies have highlighted excesses of tumors associated with exposure to dioxins [16,29] calling into question the high concentrations of these substances in the emissions released by old incinerators. In 2000, the European Community imposed limitations on permitted emissions (Directive 2000/76/EC, adopted in Italy in 2005) after which there was a gradual decrease in the concentrations emitted. In fact, the maximum permitted concentrations of dioxins, in Italy, have been lowered from 4000 ng/m3 (Ministerial Decree DM 7 December 1990) to 0.1 ng/m3 (Legislative Decree number 5 November 2005) [2]. Moreover, where a health impact of the change in technology has been reported, the results have been encouraging [30].
The proximity of other industrial plants and heavy traffic roads, and the presence of socio-economic disadvantaged groups within the exposed populations, are crucial issues in the health impact assessment of incinerators [31]. Advanced methods and tools to assess the weak associations between environmental exposures and health outcomes are thus valuable, especially when studying long-term latency diseases such as cancers and past exposure. Environmental research activity in this field requires conducting complex analysis because population health is influenced by interactions between individual and environmental characteristics, exposures and related health behaviors.
The importance of using a flexible modeling strategy for assessing the risk of cancer in the vicinity of municipal solid waste incinerators was outlined by Goria et al. [32]. Dispersion models to assess the exposure to municipal solid waste incinerators reduce the exposure misclassification (with respect to distance), taking into account several factors, such as point source and meteorological characteristics, topography, and orography [33]. In recent epidemiological studies conducted in Italy, models for cohorts of geocoded residents were used, with individual exposure based on dispersion models and risk calculation adjusted for potential confounders, including environmental and occupational exposures and socio-economic deprivation [21,22]. The objective of the present epidemiological study is to assess the impact on the health of exposure to emissions produced by the municipal waste incinerator (MWI) in the municipality of Pisa, through a residential cohort study on mortality and hospital admissions. For this purpose, nosological causes associated with the main air pollutants were selected, and other sources of air pollution and indicators of socio-economic status were considered.

2. Methods

This study was set up in December 2014 as part of a convention between the municipality of Pisa and the Institute of Clinical Physiology of the National Research Council of Italy, IFC-CNR (Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries Unit). The research results were made public in October 2017. The methods were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles. No personal identifiers were sent to the research staff, all addresses were geocoded and the personal data were analyzed anonymously.

2.1. The Incinerator (MWI) and the Area of Investigation

The study area (Figure 1) is delimited by the administrative borders of the municipality of Pisa (89,158 inhabitants) in central Italy. The MWI is located in the peri-urban area outside of Pisa town center. The plant has been operative since 1981 and treats about 65,000 tonnes of waste per year. The MWI has been modified and renewed many times over the years in order to comply with the law. In 2000, the plant was equipped for energy recovery with a steam generator, turbines, and generator. Over time, different types of new filter bags have been used in order to improve the ability to eliminate dioxins. The use of catalytic filter bags facilitates the removal of micro-pollutants from 10 to 100 times below the limit and reduces the NOχ concentration in the chimney. The latest generation of filter bags used are catalytic bags for NOχ, which, in particular, act on the structure of dioxins and furans that are degraded and destroyed.
Pisa has a predominance of tertiary and commercial activities, with three universities, a large research center, and a regional hospital. Industrial settlements have shrunk over the past few decades and thus only small factories remain, along with a medium-sized factory, Saint Gobain (Pisa, Italy), which produces glass. The area surrounding the MWI is located within a network of roads that lead to the city, which includes small industries, artisans’ workshops, an exhibition center, and agricultural activities. The study area (Figure 1) includes the greatest sources of pollution (such as the MWI, principal roads, and industrial plants) and for which environmental data produced by the regional agency for environmental protection (Pisa, Italy) are available.

2.2. Study Design

A residential cohort design with a retrospective approach was adopted. The cohort of residents is dynamic. The following were considered during the follow-up period (1 January 2001–31 December 2014): (a) migratory movements from and to the municipality, (b) migratory movements within the municipality, (c) births and deaths of residents in the municipality. For each subject in the cohort, the residential history during the follow-up period was considered, and each residence address was georeferenced. All subjects were followed up until the date of residence exit from the study area, the first specific-cause of hospitalization, or the time of death.

2.3. Exposure Assessment

Atmospheric dispersion models relating to emissions from the MWI and the other pollution sources located in the area were used by the CALMET-CALPUFF method (http://www.src.com/) carried out by the TEA (Energy and Environment Technologies) Engineering group, (http://www.tea-group.com/). The simulation models used environmental and meteorological data for 2015 and 2006, and considering the orography of the area. Annual average concentration maps for NOχ, PM10, SO2, and selected metal (Hg, Zn, Cd) emissions were obtained. NOχ was considered as a surrogate tracer of air pollution in order to estimate exposure to the MWI (called NOχ-MWI) and the other industrial plants (NOχ-IND). Despite the different chemical nature of the pollutants emitted in the area of investigation of the residential cohort, their diffusion in the air follows a common model. In fact, their diffusions were strongly correlated with each other (correlation coefficients ρ > 0.65 with type I error probability p < 0.001). Therefore, as a pollutant surrogate of the emissions in the present study the diffusion map of nitrogen oxides (NOχ) was used.
NOχ was used as a surrogate of air pollution due to its high correlation with each of the other pollutants, and its availability for each source. For the other industrial plants, an overall NOχ concentration map, defined as the sum of the NOχ concentrations from each map, was used (called NOχ-IND). As no concentration maps were available for the major roads, a model of land-use regression for the estimation of traffic-related NOχ (NOχ-TR) was used [34,35,36].
For each subject in the cohort, the history of residential exposure to NOχ during the follow-up period was considered [23]. Each subject contributed to the study with an exposure load, determined by the sum of the time spent in each address in which the person had been resident (person-years). For each source of pollution, four exposure classes were defined using the quartiles of the distribution of NOχ concentrations attributed to the cohort population. The four classes were so defined as follows: (1) low exposure NOχ-MWI ≤ 0.013; (2) medium-low exposure to pollution 0.013 < NOχ-MWI ≤ 0.019; (3) medium-high exposure to pollution 0.019 < NOχ-MWI ≤ 0.031; (4) high exposure NOχ-MWI > 0.03 (exposure classes of MWI in Figure 1).

2.4. Definition of Health Indicators

As health outcomes, mortality and hospital discharge records were considered. Data were used from the Tuscan Regional Mortality Register (Firenze, Italy ) for the period 2001–2012 and from the Regional Hospital Information System (Firenze, Italy ) (Hospital Discharge Records, HDRs) for 2001–2014. All record linkage procedures were carried out ensuring anonymity, according to the management rules of the regional information systems, in compliance with the current legislation on privacy. The causes of mortality and hospitalization were reported, which were defined a priori in line with the strongest evidence in the scientific literature in terms of air pollution, with the relative ICD IX codes in Table A1. In the Italian Health National Service, the HDRs are the information gathering tool for every patient discharged from public and private institutions throughout the national territory. The hospitalization data we used include hospitalization in ordinary (planned by appointment), day-hospital, and emergency regimens. For each hospitalization during the follow-up period, the only main diagnosis for the first discharge was considered.

2.5. Socio-Economic Status

The socio-economic status (SES) of each patient was expressed using the Italian deprivation index (DI) calculated using the 2001 Italian population census tract data [37]. DI is a sum of five census standardized continuous variables based on a regional average: low level of education, unemployment, one-parent family, home rental, and home overcrowding. TDI is an ordinal variable classified on the basis of the quintiles of the DI distribution in the cohort, with deprivation classes high, medium-high, medium, medium-low, and low.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

To study the relationship between the exposure of NOχ-MWI and the cause-specific mortality and morbidity of the residents in the area, a hazard ratio of MWI exposure adjusted for age, other environmental sources (NOχ-IND, NOχ-TR), and DI was calculated separately for men and women, by multiple Cox linear regression [hazard ratios with confidence interval at 95% of probability (HR, CI95%)]. HRs were calculated comparing each of the most exposed areas with the least exposed area, considered as a reference. The value of the probability of the first type error p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (p < 0.10 was reported as borderline significant). Meteorological factors such as season, temperature, and humidity were not included in the Cox regression model since they were duly considered in the model for the environmental study that estimated the diffusion of pollutants precisely taking into account the orography and meteorology characteristics.
For each cause of death and hospitalization, an adjusted linear trend of HR (HRt) over the categories of exposure with the relative 95% CI and p-value was also calculated. The analyses were performed using STATA release 13 (Stata Statistical Software, College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, USA).

3. Results

The characteristics of the study population are reported in Table 1. The cohort included 132,293 inhabitants (1,092,817 person-years, of which 52.6% were women). A total of 335,760 person-years (30.72%) were included in the class with the highest exposure.
The mean Municipal Waste Incinerator related NOχ (NOχ-MWI) distribution as estimated by the diffusion model was 0.025 µg/m3 (SD 0.019 µg/m3), with a maximum value of 0.522 µg/m3. The mean concentration level in the four classes was: lowest class: NOχ-MWI (µg/m3) ≤ 0.013; second class: 0.013 < NOχ-MWI (µg/m3) ≤ 0.019; third class: 0.019 < NOχ-MWI µg/m3) ≤ 0.031; highest class: NOχ-MWI (µg/m3) > 0.031.
The association between sex and NOχ-MWI was statistically significant: in females, the highest percentages of person-years (PY) were in the second and third classes of NOχ-MWI, whereas in males, this percentage was higher in the third and fourth classes. The percentage of person-years (PY) increases across the classes of NOχ-MWI in, both, males and females. The association between age and NOχ-MWI was statistically significant: the average age decreased with the increase in the exposure class of NOχ-MWI. The association between other industrial plants related NOχ (NOχ-IND) and NOχ-MWI was statistically significant: the averages of NOχ-IND were higher in the second and third classes than the other classes. The association between traffic-related NOχ (NOχ-TR) and NOχ-MWI was statistically significant: the NOχ-TR averages were higher in the third and fourth classes than the other classes (the LUR model, estimated as part of the project ESCAPE, 2013, estimates NOχ emissions from road traffic that are higher than those of the incinerator, but differently distributed over the territory). The DI class averages were significantly heterogeneous among the NOχ classes. The mortality analysis showed (Table 2): in males, an excess general mortality in the highest exposure class compared to the lowest class (n. 1,662; HR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.00–1.19) and an HR trend (HRt = 1.02; p = 0.06), and in particular mortality due to natural cause (n. 1,571; HR = 1.10; 95% CI 1.01–1.20; HRt = 1.03; p = 0.05); an excess risk and an HR trend in males with lymphohematopoietic system cancers (n. 59; HR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.03–3.12; HRt = 1.23; p = 0.01); an excess risk and a HR trend in males for cardiovascular diseases (n. 592; HR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.05–1.39; HRt = 1.06; p = 0.01); in particular for acute myocardial infarction and ischemic diseases of the heart (n. 104; HR = 1.38; 95% CI 0.97–1.98; HRt = 1.17; p = 0.01; n. 244; HR = 1.24; 95% CI 0.99–1.55; HRt = 1.09; p = 0.01 respectively); an excess risk and an HR trend in females of the highest class of exposure for acute respiratory diseases (n. 39; HR = 2.52; 95% CI 1.31–4.83; HRt = 1.19; p = 0.04); an excess risk and an HR trend in males for tumors of the lymphohematopoietic system (n. 59, HR = 1.79 95% CI 1.03–3.12; HRt = 1.23, p = 0.01); in particular, an HR trend in both genders for leukemia although these were based on few cases (Male HRt = 1.26; p = 0.06–Female, HRt = 1.39; p = 0.06) and an HR trend in males for non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (HRt = 1.29; p = 0.08). The morbidity analysis (Table 3) showed an HR trend for tumors of the lymphohematopoietic system in males (HRt = 1.14; p = 0.04). In addition, a trend close to the limit of statistical significance was observed for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in males (HRt = 1.21; p = 0.06) and leukemia in males (HRt = 1.21; p = 0.07).

4. Discussion

This study assessed the health effects of the exposure to pollutants emitted by the MWI. The mortality and morbidity were studied in a cohort of residents in the municipality of Pisa in the period 2001–2014. The study was conducted with the retrospective longitudinal residential cohort approach in which residents were followed over fourteen years by assigning a level of exposure to the address of residence of each subject which was obtained by modeling techniques based on dispersion models. The residential cohort approach is the highest level of etiological study design for which it is possible to use routine health data. The objective was to assess whether and to what extent the risks of death/hospitalization of residents were greater where the exposure to NOχ-MWI was higher.
Exposure to NOχ produced by MWI was chosen as a surrogate measure of exposure to air pollution, which was supported by the high and statistically significant correlation between NOχ, PM, SO2, and selected metals. The NOχ simulation models used environmental data from 2015 and meteorological data from 2006. The assumption of a lack of temporal variability of exposure is sustainable considering that major changes in operating conditions of the MWI plant in 2001–2014 are not documented by its monitoring systems, and as the meteorological data for 2006 was in the middle of the follow-up period, it can be reasonably assumed as representative. The quartiles of the spatial distribution of the NOχ-MWI were used to define four classes of exposure without considering the absolute values of the annual NO average, in order to divide the total area into four subareas according to an ordinal exposure scale.
A limitation of the present epidemiological study is to have estimated the environmental exposure based on the concentration attributed to the residence address, through a relapse model (as a proxy). Moreover, the study design did not consider individual risk factors, such as occupational activity, workplace, tobacco smoke, and other lifestyle habits, which are recognized as potential confounders as they are associated with both the exposure and health outcomes under study. In fact, data on the personal habits of subjects that might have played a role in the investigated health outcomes (in particular cigarette smoking, alcohol use, obesity, physical activity, and occupation) were not available, and considering the retrospective nature of the study, collecting such information would have been practically impossible. Our assumption that these risk factors are uniformly distributed in the study area seems reasonable considering that the complex exposure map was defined by the diffusion model. On the other hand, an alternative hypothesis that the confounders are greater in the most exposed areas would seem implausible.
Although a distortion effect due to lack of adjustment for the above mentioned potential confounders cannot be ruled out, assuming a positive role of the correction applied by the deprivation index is reasonable. In fact, many of the personal habits listed are associated with socioeconomic status and DI was considered as a proxy of individual socio-economic deprivation. Research on the relation between socioeconomic status, neighborhood environments, and health has grown rapidly in recent years. Neighborhood deprivation, often measured as a composite of sociodemographic census-level variables, is one way of measuring the socioeconomic environment. For example, living in a more socioeconomically deprived neighborhood has been associated with higher smoking levels [38,39,40]. The relationship between socioeconomic status and health is due to behavioral factors, such as unhealthy eating habits [41] or specific unhealthy drinking patterns [42].
Our approach was in line with other studies of national and international importance [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51] and does not rule out that there may still be residual confounding factors. On the other hand, the assumption that the effect of non-controllable residual confounding is non-differential and consequently leads to a risk underestimation seems reasonable. The selection of just a limited number of causes of mortality and hospitalization with stronger evidence of association with environmental determinants weakens the possible distortion effect of multiple testing.
The present study shows associations between exposure to MWI emissions and an increased mortality trend among males for general and natural causes (trend + 2% and + 3%, respectively), tumor of the lymphohematopoietic system (trend + 23%), in particular NHL (+ 29%), cardiovascular diseases (+ 6%); acute respiratory diseases among females (+ 19%); and leukemia in both genders (M + 26%, F + 39%). In addition, an increasing HR trend was confirmed for hospitalization due to tumor of the lymphohematopoietic system in males (+ 14%), in particular for NHL (+ 21%) and leukemia (+ 21%).
In general, the excesses detected for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases are in agreement with the epidemiological evidence available on the cardiovascular and respiratory effects induced by air pollution [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. Excess risks for cardiovascular diseases have been reported in relation to atmospheric pollution due to MWIs [21,23,24,27,28] and respiratory diseases [9,21,22,23,24]. Exposure to incinerators has been variously associated with increases in both mortality and hospitalization for tumors of the lymphohematopoietic system, in particular, NHL and leukemia [7,8,13,15,61,62].
The MWI of Pisa has been operative since 1981 and has subsequently undergone many changes and renewals adapting to the emissions law regulations. This variability in the emissions over time has advised us against a time trend study in favor of a comparison study between exposed and non-exposed over a long period. The follow-up of fewer than 20 years of this study did not fully cover the induction-latency period of most cancers. The greater number of risk associations for mortality compared to hospitalization could be partly due to exposures occurring at the beginning or before the start of the follow-up, and a more extensive examination regarding the age of the end-points would be useful.
The excess mortality and hospital admissions for tumors of the lymphohematopoietic system observed only among men in areas with higher pollution estimates, as well as the mortality excess for diseases of the cardiovascular system, require further investigation. In the light of the misalignment observed between males and females, the present results should be evaluated with caution, also because women are generally a more stable population than men and therefore less exposed to misclassification of exposure [30]. Gender differences in health risk features should be explored further also examining behavioral risk factors of men and women and the consequences in terms of health inequalities [63].

5. Conclusions

The results achieved were sent to the administrators of the municipality of Pisa with the general recommendation that the health of all the population residing in areas adjacent to the incinerator should be protected. The present epidemiological study recommends the adoption of specific policies to contain both the production of waste and the need to dispose of it. We suggested caution in deciding whether to build a new incinerator or to renovate the existing one, taking into consideration the current state of health in the relapse area. Population health is affected by complex interactions between different determinants as socio-economic, environmental, and policy circumstances that can directly influence health outcomes, affect exposure (confounding), or the relationships between environment and health (effect modifying). Although our study used a cohort design based on the individual exposure data (proxy) and health effect with adjustment by socio-economic status indicator, we are aware that other variables would be relevant to achieve a more reliable assessment. We are aware that improving the definition of exposure and potential confounders is the mainstream to increase the reliability of the evidence and their transferability to public health policies. We are advocates of the holistic approach but often we find ourselves having to mediate between our aspirations and the limits of data and available resources, in addition to having to guarantee the respect for the privacy of the people involved in the studies. The adoption of a specifically designed environmental and health surveillance system and the true involvement of stakeholders in all phases of waste management have also been suggested. At the end of 2017, the results of the study were presented to the municipal administrators and then in a public assembly. Since the beginning of 2018, the incinerator has been shut down following the decision to decommission it and decisions are now being taken regarding the entire waste cycle.

Author Contributions

A.M.R. coordinated the study and wrote the paper; F.B. coordinated the project within which the study was developed, collaborated in the preparation of the manuscript and contributed to review the article; O.C. reviewed the scientific literature, wrote the paper, reviewed, and edited the article; F.M. coordinated the residential cohort study, performed the statistical analysis, prepared and discussed the results, and contributed to prepare and review the article. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Municipality of Pisa Town through the Convention with the Institute of Clinical Physiology of the National Research Council of Italy (IFC-CNR) (project code 0011129 December 23, 2014).

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank: E Bustaffa, A Coi and M Santoro, Unit of Environmental Epidemiology and Diseases Registries, for scientific and technical activities to carry out the study; C Imiotti and R Panini, Unit of Environmental Epidemiology and Diseases Registries, for technical and administrative activities to carry out the study; M Vigotti, former researcher at Pisa University, for her technical-scientific support for the reconstruction of the residents’ cohort; J Borsi, A Righi, C Donati, A Ansiati, TEA Engineering group, that performed the modeling study on the impact of industrial pollution sources on the air quality in Pisa urban area; N Caranci, Health and Social Agency - Emilia-Romagna Region - Bologna, for data and methods concerning the socio-economic deprivation index; M Redini, Environment Department of the Municipality of Pisa, for his administrative and technical support throughout the course of the study; M Bonfanti, Territorial Information System of the Municipality of Pisa, and N Guerrini, registry office of the Municipality of Pisa, for granting of personal data; S Baroni, R Barontini and G Starnino, Consortium of North-West Tuscany area - Tuscany Region - Pisa, for granting individual data on hospital admissions; G Merico, Plant manager, Soc. GEOFOR, Pisa.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Appendix A

Table A1. Mortality and hospitalization causes considered in the present study-International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-IX) associated codes.
Table A1. Mortality and hospitalization causes considered in the present study-International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-IX) associated codes.
Mortality and Hospitalization CausesICD-9 Codes
All mortality causes001–999
Mortality due to natural causes001–799
Cancers
Stomach151
Colorectal153–154
Liver cancer155
Lung cancer162
Connective and other soft tissues171
Central nervous system191–192, 225
Lymphatic and haematopoietic tissues200–208
Leukemia204–208
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma 200, 202
Cardiovascular diseases390–459
Acute myocardial infarction410
Ischemic heart diseases410–414
Cerebrovascular diseases430–438
Respiratory diseases460–519
Acute respiratory diseases460–466, 480–487
Chronic pulmonary diseases491–492, 494–496

References

  1. Directive 2006/126/EC of the European parliament and of the council. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:403:0018:0060:EN:PDF (accessed on 31 May 2019).
  2. Associazione Italiana di Epidemiologia. Italian Association of Epidemiology. Waste processing and health. A position document of the Italian Association of Epidemiology (AIE). Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita. 2008, 44, 301–306. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bretzel, F.C.; Calderisi, M. Contribution of a municipal solid waste incinerator to the trace metals in the surrounding soil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 182, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Franchini, M.; Rial, M.; Buiatti, E.; Bianchi, F. Health effects of exposure to waste incinerator emissions:a review of epidemiological studies. Ann Ist. Super. Sanita. 2004, 40, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Mitis, F.; Martuzzi, M. Population Health and Waste Management: Scientific Data and Policy Options; WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pirastu, R.; Zona, A.; Ancona, C.; Bruno, C.; Fano, V.; Fazzo, L.; Iavarone, I.; Minichilli, F.; Mitis, F.; Pasetto, R. Mortality results in SENTIERI Project. Epidemiol. Prev. 2011, 35, 29–152. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Signorelli, C.; Riccò, M.; Vinceti, M. Waste incinerator and human health: A state-of-the-art review. Ann. Ig. 2008, 20, 251–277. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Porta, D.; Milani, S.; Lazzarino, A.I.; Perucci, C.A.; Forastiere, F. Systematic review of epidemiological studies on health effects associated with management of solid waste. Environ. Health. 2009, 8, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mattiello, A.; Chiodini, P.; Bianco, E.; Forgione, N.; Flammia, I.; Gallo, C.; Pizzuti, R.; Panico, S. Health effects associated with the disposal of solid waste in landfills and incinerators in populations living in surrounding areas: A systematic review. Int. J. Public Health. 2013, 58, 725–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ashworth, D.C.; Elliott, P.; Toledano, M.B. Waste incineration and adverse birth and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review. Environ. Int. 2014, 69, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reis, M.F.; Miguel, J.P.; Sampaio, C.; Aguiar, P.; Melim, J.M.; Päpke, O. Determinants of dioxins and furans in blood of non-occupationally exposed populations living near Portuguese solid waste incinerators. Chemosphere 2007, 67, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Salerno, C.; Marciani, P.; Barasolo, E.; Fossale, P.G.; Panella, M.; Palin, L.A. Exploration study on mortality trends in the territory surrounding an incineration plant of urban solid waste in the municipality of Vercelli (Piedmont, Italy) 1988–2009. Ann. Ig. 2015, 27, 633–645. [Google Scholar]
  13. García-Pérez, J.; Fernández, N.P.; Castelló, A.; López-Cima, M.F.; Ramis, R.; Boldo, E.; López-Abente, G. Cancer mortality in towns in the vicinity of incinerators and installations for the recovery or disposal of hazardous waste. Environ. Int. 2013, 51, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Knox, E. Childhood cancers, birthplaces, incinerators and landfill sites. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2000, 29, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Viel, J.F.; Côme, D.; Sarah, G.; Pascal, F.; Perrine, C.C.; Erik-André, S.; Pascal, E.B. Risk for non Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the vicinity of French municipal solid waste incinerators. Environ. Health. 2008, 7, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tessari, R.; Canova, C.; Canal, F.; Lafisca, S.; Inio, A.; Murer, B.; Stracca, V.; Tollot, M.; Simonato, L. Environmental pollution from dioxins and soft tissue sarcomas in the population of Venice and Mestre: An example of the use of current electronic information sources. Epidemiol. Prev. 2006, 30, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Zambon, P.; Paolo, R.; Emanuela, B.; Alessandro, C.; Massimo, G.; Anna, R.F.; Francesco, C.; Stefano, G. Sarcoma risk and dioxin emissions from incinerators and industrial plants: A population-based case-control study (Italy). Environ. Health 2007, 6, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Parodi, S.; Baldi, R.; Benco, C.; Franchini, M.; Garrone, E.; Vercelli, M.; Pensa, F.; Puntoni, R.; Fontana, V. Lung cancer mortality in a district of La Spezia (Italy) exposed to air pollution from industrial plants. Tumori 2004, 90, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shy, C.M.; Darrah, D.; Donald, L.F.; Shaibal, M.; Milan, J.H.; Brian, A.B.; Dietrich, R.; Patsy, M.B.; Robert, B.D.; Dennis, D.W.; et al. Do waste incinerators induce adverse respiratory effects? An air quality and epidemiological study of six communities. Environ. Health Perspect. 1995, 103, 714–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lee, J.T.; Shy, C.M. Respiratory function as measured by peak expiratory flow rate and PM10: Six communities study. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1999, 9, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Minichilli, F.; Michele, S.; Nunzia, L.; Fabrizio, B. Epidemiological population-based cohort study on mortality and hospitalization in the area near the waste incinerator plant of San Zeno, Arezzo (Tuscany Region, Central Italy). Epidemiol. Prev. 2016, 40, 33–43. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mataloni, F.; Chiara, B.; Martina, N.G.; Andrea, B.; Simone, B.; Roberto, S.; Francesco, F.; Marina, D.; Carla, A. Morbidity and mortality of people who live close to municipal waste landfills: A multisite cohort study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 45, 806–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, Y.M.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, H.J. Burden of disease attributable to air pollutants from municipal solid waste incinerators in Seoul, Korea: A source-specific approach for environmental burden of disease. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 2019–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Golini, M.N.; Ancona, C.; Badaloni, C.; Bolignano, A.; Bucci, S.; Sozzi, R.; Davoli, M.; Forastiere, F. Morbidity in a population living close to urban waste incinerator plants in Lazio Region (Central Italy): A retrospective cohort study using a before-after design. Epidemiol. Prev. 2014, 38, 323–334. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hsiue, T.R.; Lee, S.S.; Chen, H.I. Effects of air pollution resulting from wire reclamation incineration on pulmonary function in children. Chest 1991, 100, 698–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Miyake, Y.; Yura, A.; Misaki, H.; Ikeda, Y.; Usui, T.; Iki, M.; Shimizu, T. Relationship between distance of schools from the nearest municipal waste incineration plant and child health in Japan. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2005, 20, 1023–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fonte, L.; Murtas, R.; Russo, A.G. Comparison between cohort and case-control approaches for health impact assessment on a population exposed to the emissions of an incinerator. Epidemiol. Prev. 2017, 41, 176–183. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ancona, C.; Simona, M.; Antonio, I.L.; Carlo, A.P.; Francesco, F. Mortality and morbidity in a population exposed to multiple sources of air pollution: A retrospective cohort study using air dispersion models. Environ. Res. 2015, 137, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Viel, J.F.; Marie, C.C.; Mathieu, H.; Sébastien, G.; Bruno, C.; Arlette, D. Dioxin emissions from a municipal solid waste incinerator and risk of invasive breast cancer: A population-based case-control study with GIS-derived exposure. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2008, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ranzi, A.; Fano, V.; Erspamer, L.; Lauriola, P.; Perucci, C.A.; Forastiere, F. Mortality and morbidity among people living close to incinerators: A cohort study based on dispersion modeling for exposure assessment. Environ. Health 2011, 10, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rimmer, D.L.; Vizard, C.G.; Pless-Mulloli, T.; Singleton, I.; Air, V.S.; Keatinge, Z.A. Metal contamination of urban soils in the vicinity of a municipal waste incinerator: One source among many. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 356, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Goria, S.; Côme, D.; Perrine, C.C.; Pascal, E.B.; Pascal, F.; Marc, C.; Cedric, D.; Jean, F.V.; Sylvia, R. Risk of cancer in the vicinity of municipal solid waste incinerators: Importance of using a flexible modelling strategy. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2009, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cordioli, M.; Ranzi, A.; Leo, G.A.; Lauriola, P. A review of exposure assessment methods in epidemiological studies on incinerators. J. Environ. Public Health 2013, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Escape Project. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/88859/reporting/en. (accessed on 1 June 2019).
  35. Lee, J.H.; Wu, C.F.; Hoek, G.; Hoogh, K.; Beelen, R.; Brunekreef, B.; Chan, C.C. Land use regression models for estimating individual NOx and NO exposures in a metropolis with a high density of traffic roads and population. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 472, 1163–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, M.; Rob, B.; Marloes, E.; Kees, M.; Gerard, H.; Bert, B. Systematic evaluation of land use regression models for NO2. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 4481–4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Caranci, N.; Biggeri, A.; Grisotto, L.; Pacelli, B.; Spadea, T.; Costa, G. The Italian deprivation index at census block level: Definition, description and association with general mortality. Epidemiol. Prev. 2010, 34, 167–176. [Google Scholar]
  38. Messer, L.C.; Laraia, B.A.; Kaufman, J.S.; Eyster, J.; Holzman, C.; Culhane, J.; Elo, I.; Burke, J.G.; Campo, P. The development of a standardized neighborhood deprivation index. J. Urban Health 2006, 83, 1041–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pearce, J.; Barnett, R.; Moon, G. Sociospatial inequalities in health-related behaviours: Pathways linking place and smoking. Prog. Hum. Geog. 2014, 36, 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Riva, M.; Gauvin, L.; Barnett, T.A. Toward the next generation of research into small area effects on health: A synthesis of multilevel investigations published since July 1998. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2007, 61, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gharipour, M.; Masoumeh, S.; Fatemeh, N.; Pouya, N.; Saleem, S.Q.; Marzieh, T.; Maryam, M.; Ali, A.; Bahram, S.; Nizal, S. Socioeconomic determinants and metabolic syndrome: Results from the Isfahan Healthy Heart Program. Acta Biomed. 2017, 87, 291–298. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mäkelä, P.; Paljärvi, T. Do consequences of a given pattern of drinking vary by socioeconomic status? A mortality and hospitalisation follow-up for alcohol-related causes of the Finnish Drinking Habits Surveys. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008, 62, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pasetto, R.; Zengarini, N.; Caranci, N.; Santis, M.; Minichilli, F.; Santoro, M.; Pirastu, R.; Comba, P. Environmental justice in the epidemiological surveillance system of residents in Italian National Priority Contaminated Sites. Epidemiol. Prev. 2017, 41, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lillini, R.; Quaglia, A.; Vercelli, M. Building of a local deprivation index to measure the health status in the Liguria Region. Epidemiol. Prev. 2012, 36, 180–187. [Google Scholar]
  45. Comba, P.; Pirastu, R.; Conti, S.; Santis, M.; Iavarone, I.; Marsili, G.; Mincuzzi, A.; Minelli, G.; Manno, V.; Minerba, S.; et al. Environment and health in Taranto, southern Italy: Epidemiological studies and public health recommendations. Epidemiol. Prev. 2012, 36, 305–320. [Google Scholar]
  46. Domínguez-Berjón, M.F.; Borrell, C. Mortality and socioeconomic deprivation in the census tracts and districts of Barcelona. Gac. Sanit. 2005, 19, 363–369. [Google Scholar]
  47. Minichilli, F.; Fabrizio, M.; Daniela, N.; Fabio, V.; Francesco, C.; Fabrizio, B. State of health of populations residing in geothermal areas of Tuscany. Epidemiol. Prev. 2012, 36, 1–104. [Google Scholar]
  48. Izco Goñi, N.; Moreno Iribas, C.; Etxeberría Andueza, J.; Delfrade Osinaga, J.; Floristán Floristán, Y.; Otros, M.M. Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in Pamplona and Logroño (cities in the North of Spain) in the 1996-2007 period. An. Sist. Sanit. Navar. 2013, 36, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stanners, G.; Walsh, D.; McCartney, G. Is ‘excess’ mortality in Glasgow an artefact of measurement? Public Health 2015, 129, 684–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. De Santis, M.; Pasetto, R.; Minelli, G.; Conti, S. Methods for mortality analysis in SENTIERI Project. Epidemiol. Prev. 2011, 35, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gregory, I.N. Comparisons between geographies of mortality and deprivation from the 1900s and 2001: Spatial analysis of census and mortality statistics. BMJ 2009, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hansell, A.; Ghosh, R.E.; Blangiardo, M.; Perkins, C.; Vienneau, D.; Goffe, K.; Briggs, D.; Gulliver, J. Historic air pollution exposure and long-term mortality risks in England and Wales: Prospective longitudinal cohort study. Thorax 2016, 71, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guan, W.J.; Zheng, X.Y.; Chung, K.F.; Zhong, N.S. Impact of air pollution on the burden of chronic respiratory diseases in China: Time for urgent action. Lancet 2016, 388, 1939–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Stockfelt, L.; Andersson, E.M.; Molnár, P.; Gidhagen, L.; Segersson, D.; Rosengren, A.; Barregard, L.; Sallsten, G. Long-term effects of total and source-specific particulate air pollution on incident cardiovascular disease in Gothenburg, Sweden. Environ. Res. 2017, 7, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dehbi, H.M.; Blangiardo, M.; Gulliver, J.; Fecht, D.; Hoogh, K.; Al-Kanaani, Z.; Tillin, T.; Hardy, R.; Chaturvedi, N.; Hansell, A. Air pollution and cardiovascular mortality with over 25years follow-up: A combined analysis of two British cohorts. Environ. Int. 2017, 99, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hoek, G.; Krishnan, R.M.; Beelen, R.; Peters, A.; Ostro, B.; Brunekreef, B.; Kaufman, J.D. Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio-respiratory mortality: A review. Environ. Health 2013, 12, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mustafić, H.; Patricia, J.; Christophe, C. Main air pollutants and myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2012, 307, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shah, A.S.; Jeremy, P.L.; Harish, N.; David, A.M.; Amanda, L.H.; Ken, D.; David, E.N.; Nicholas, L.M. Global association of air pollution and heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013, 382, 1039–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Newby, D.E.; Mannucci, P.M.; Tell, G.S.; Baccarelli, A.A.; Brook, R.D.; Donaldson, K.; Forastiere, F.; Franchini, M.; Franco, O.H.; Graham, I.; et al. Expert position paper on air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Air quality guidelines. Global update 2005. Particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/air-quality/publications/pre2009/air-quality-guidelines.-global-update-2005.-particulate-matter,-ozone,-nitrogen-dioxide-and-sulfur-dioxide. (accessed on 24 May 2019).
  61. Bianchi, F.; Minichilli, F. Mortality for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the period 1981–2000 in 25 Italian municipalities with urban solid waste incinerators. Epidemiol. Prev. 2006, 30, 80–81. [Google Scholar]
  62. Viel, J.F.; Floret, N.; Deconinck, E.; Focant, J.F.; Pauw, E.; Cahn, J.Y. Increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and serum organochlorine concentrations among neighbors of a municipal solid waste incinerator. Environ. Int. 2011, 37, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Day, S.; Mason, R.; Tannenbaum, C.; Rochon, P.A. Essential metrics for assessing sex & gender integration in health research proposals involving human participants. PLoS ONE 2017, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The study area.
Figure 1. The study area.
Ijerph 16 02863 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of the cohort by NOχ-MWI classes.
Table 1. Characteristics of the cohort by NOχ-MWI classes.
Classes of NOχ-MWI (µg/m3) Totalp
CohortNOχ-MWI ≤ 0.0130.013 < NOχ-MWI ≤ 0.0190.019 < NOχ-MWI ≤ 0.031NOχ-MWI > 0.031
Female (PY)102,130135,534161,875175,633575,172<0.001
Females in the exposure classes (%)17.7623.5628.1430.54100
Females in single exposure class (%)52.1853.1052.8952.3152.63
Male (PY)93,613119,694144,211160,127517,645
Males in the exposure classes (%)18.0823.1227.8630.93100
Males in single exposure class (%)47.8246.9047.1147.6947.37
Total (PY)195,743255,228306,086335,7601,092,817
Subjects in the exposure classes (%)17.9123.3628.0130.72100
Subjects in single exposure class (%)100100100100100
Age (mean)47.7446.4846.9745.5846.57<0.001
SD23.0123.0623.0322.2722.82<0.001
NOχ-IND (mean)0.861.501.270.761.10<0.001
SD0.620.950.350.310.66<0.001
NOχ-LUR (mean)26.5631.0135.1432.1431.72<0.001
SD10.3510.7912.1312.3211.94<0.001
DI class (mean)2.512.422.292.762.50<0.001
SD1.141.111.061.091.11<0.001
Legend: MWI: Municipal waste incinerator; PY person-year; LUR: land use regression; DI: deprivation index.
Table 2. 2001–2012 mortality associated with exposure to NOχ-MWI for sex.
Table 2. 2001–2012 mortality associated with exposure to NOχ-MWI for sex.
Mortality CausesSexExp Class *NHazard Ratio **pIC95%HR TrendpIC95%
All causesMlow1114
high16621.090.041.001.191.020.061.001.05
Flow1252
high17281.030.420.951.121.010.260.991.04
Natural causes Mlow1050
high15711.100.031.011.201.030.051.001.05
Flow1213
high16511.020.590.941.111.010.380.991.04
Stomach cancerMlow18
high280.800.520.411.570.950.630.771.17
Flow9
high181.180.720.492.801.080.510.851.38
Colorectal cancerMlow33
high540.920.740.571.481.000.970.871.15
Flow42
high621.020.920.661.591.000.950.881.15
Liver cancerMlow24
high371.150.620.652.050.990.900.841.17
Flow24
high290.900.740.481.670.910.370.741.12
Lung cancerMlow130
high1720.920.530.711.190.960.350.891.04
Flow36
high571.220.390.771.941.050.510.911.21
Connective and other soft tissuesMlow2
high20.970.980.118.360.950.870.501.79
Flow2
high10.270.360.024.580.850.680.391.86
Lymphatic and hematopoietic tissuesMlow21
high591.790.041.033.121.230.011.051.43
Flow23
high381.260.430.712.211.090.340.921.29
LeukemiaMlow10
high261.640.230.733.701.260.060.991.61
Flow3
high143.290.080.8712.501.390.060.991.93
Non-Hodgkin lymphomaMlow5
high202.310.120.806.681.290.080.971.70
Flow9
high131.370.500.553.411.070.610.821.41
Central nervous systemMlow4
high131.870.320.546.441.220.200.901.65
Flow13
high80.380.060.141.050.810.160.601.09
Cardiovascular diseasesMlow372
high5921.210.011.051.391.060.011.021.11
Flow538
high7401.020.820.901.151.020.230.991.06
Acute myocardial infarctionMlow58
high1041.380.070.971.981.170.011.051.31
Flow56
high731.130.540.761.691.020.750.911.15
Ischemic heart diseasesMlow153
high2441.240.060.991.551.090.011.021.17
Flow163
high2251.040.750.821.311.040.260.971.11
Cerebrovascular diseasesMlow110
high1581.100.500.841.431.040.400.951.12
Flow172
high2481.110.350.891.381.030.340.971.10
Respiratory diseasesMlow102
high1300.950.740.711.270.990.820.911.08
Flow86
high1111.140.430.821.580.990.900.901.09
Acute respiratory diseasesMlow25
high180.530.070.261.040.810.050.661.00
Flow18
high392.520.011.314.831.190.041.001.41
Chronic pulmonary diseasesMlow49
high731.180.420.791.761.050.420.931.18
Flow47
high480.870.560.551.390.940.360.821.08
* Exposure classes of MWI: low exposure NOχ-MWI ≤ 0.013; high exposure NOχ-MWI > 0.03; ** hazard ratio of MWI exposure adjusted for age, other environmental sources (NOχ-IND, NOχ-TR), and deprivation index was calculated separately for men and women by multiple Cox linear regressions comparing each of the most exposed areas with the least exposed area, considered as a reference.
Table 3. 2001–2014 hospitalization associated with exposure to NOχ-MWI for sex.
Table 3. 2001–2014 hospitalization associated with exposure to NOχ-MWI for sex.
CausesSexExp Class *NHR **pIC95%HR TrendpIC95%
Cardiovascular diseasesMlow1367
high20801.000.960.931.081.000.700.981.03
Flow1187
high17441.010.880.931.091.010.510.981.03
Ischemic heart diseasesMlow484
high7280.980.770.861.121.010.670.971.05
Flow258
high3831.010.900.851.211.020.450.971.08
Acute myocardial infarctionMlow231
high3731.080.420.901.301.030.270.981.09
Flow138
high1930.960.750.751.231.010.880.931.08
Cerebrovascular diseasesMlow414
high6070.980.740.851.121.000.910.961.04
Flow413
high6111.000.950.871.151.010.540.971.06
Respiratory diseasesMlow779
high12000.950.350.861.050.990.350.961.02
Flow652
high9840.940.250.841.050.980.140.941.01
Chronic pulmonary diseasesMlow97
high1481.120.420.841.501.000.990.921.09
Flow88
high1150.860.350.631.180.970.550.891.07
Acute respiratory diseasesMlow276
high4080.910.280.771.080.950.070.911.00
Flow207
high3551.080.450.891.301.000.970.951.06
Stomach cancerMlow37
high460.770.300.481.260.920.260.791.07
Flow15
high311.300.450.662.561.060.560.871.29
Colorectal cancerMlow122
high1890.950.710.741.221.000.960.921.08
Flow131
high1630.830.160.641.080.990.800.921.07
Connective and other soft tissuesMlow7
high70.760.640.232.460.900.540.641.27
Flow6
high50.720.630.192.710.720.110.481.08
Liver cancerMlow38
high571.110.670.691.760.950.500.831.10
Flow32
high400.940.820.551.600.940.490.791.12
Lung cancerMlow136
high1730.870.270.671.120.960.320.891.04
Flow40
high781.340.170.882.051.110.110.981.26
Lymphatic and hematopoietic tissueMlow39
high861.410.120.922.151.140.041.011.29
Flow38
high711.210.390.781.881.050.420.931.19
Non-Hodgkin lymphomaMlow11
high351.850.110.883.891.210.060.991.49
Flow14
high281.540.240.763.121.120.250.921.37
LeukemiaMlow13
high341.750.130.863.571.210.070.981.49
Flow10
high271.350.460.613.001.040.700.841.30
Central nervous systemMlow26
high440.990.980.581.721.020.850.861.19
Flow39
high460.810.380.511.300.910.190.791.05
* Exposure classes of MWI: low exposure NOχ-MWI ≤ 0.013; high exposure NOχ-MWI > 0.03; ** hazard ratio of MWI exposure adjusted for age, other environmental sources (NOχ-IND, NOχ-TR), and Deprivation index was calculated separately for men and women by multiple Cox linear regressions comparing each of the most exposed areas with the least exposed area, considered as a reference.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Romanelli, A.M.; Bianchi, F.; Curzio, O.; Minichilli, F. Mortality and Morbidity in a Population Exposed to Emission from a Municipal Waste Incinerator. A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162863

AMA Style

Romanelli AM, Bianchi F, Curzio O, Minichilli F. Mortality and Morbidity in a Population Exposed to Emission from a Municipal Waste Incinerator. A Retrospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(16):2863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162863

Chicago/Turabian Style

Romanelli, Anna Maria, Fabrizio Bianchi, Olivia Curzio, and Fabrizio Minichilli. 2019. "Mortality and Morbidity in a Population Exposed to Emission from a Municipal Waste Incinerator. A Retrospective Cohort Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 16: 2863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162863

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop