Next Article in Journal
COVID-19-Associated Acute Psychotic Disorder—Longitudinal Case Report and Brief Review of Literature
Next Article in Special Issue
Association between the Phase Angle and the Severity of Horizontal Gaze Disorder in Patients with Idiopathic Dropped Head Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnostic Tests in the Prediction of Neonatal Outcome in Early Placental Fetal Growth Restriction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intraoperative Blood Loss at Different Surgical-Procedure Stages during Posterior Spinal Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 59
Issue 2
10.3390/medicina59020407
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cardiopulmonary Cement Embolism Following Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Narrative Review

by
Tadatsugu Morimoto
*,
Takaomi Kobayashi
,
Hirohito Hirata
,
Masatsugu Tsukamoto
,
Tomohito Yoshihara
,
Yu Toda
and
Masaaki Mawatari
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga 849-8501, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(2), 407; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020407
Submission received: 21 December 2022 / Revised: 14 February 2023 / Accepted: 18 February 2023 / Published: 19 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Minimally Invasive Spinal Treatment (MIST)—a New Concept in the Treatment of Spinal Diseases Ⅱ)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fixation using cement-augmented pedicle screws (CAPS) is being increasingly performed. However, CAPS-associated cement leakage is a critical problem that can lead to cardiopulmonary cement embolism (CPCE). This narrative review aimed to explore the incidence of and risk factors and treatment strategies for CPCE and cement leakage-related complications after CAPS fixation. Data were extracted from each article, including characteristics of CPCE after CAPS fixation (incidence, location, diagnostic method and criteria, treatment, and outcome and prognosis). Overall, 28 case series and 14 case reports that met the inclusion criteria were included. Of the 1974 cases included in the review, CPCE was noted in 123, symptomatic CPCE in 35, and death in six, respectively. The frequencies of PCE and symptomatic PCE after CAPS fixation were 6% (range: 0–28.6%) and 1.3% (range: 0–26%), respectively. The range of frequencies of PCE and symptomatic PCE after CAPS fixation may have been wide because the definition of CPCE and data collection methods differed among the reports analyzed. Since PCE due to large cement emboli may be primarily related to the surgical technique, improved technique, such as minimizing the number of CAPSs by injecting low-volume high-viscosity cement at low velocity and pressure, and careful observation of cement leakage during CAPS insertion may reduce PCE associated with cement leakage. Spinal surgeons should pay more attention to the occurrence of CPCE during and after CAPS insertion, which can cause serious complications in some patients.

1. Introduction

Extended life expectancy and improved quality of life have increased the number of older patients with osteoporosis undergoing spinal surgery [1]. In osteoporotic spines, sufficient fixation strength has not been achieved because of the loss of healthy bone structure due to aging. Osteoporosis-related implant failures can be difficult to treat, thereby burdening patients and surgeons and significantly impacting healthcare economics. Therefore, methods to improve screw fixation need to be established. Over the past few decades, several techniques to increase the anchoring strength of pedicle screws and reduce the risk of screw loosening have been developed, with cement-augmented pedicle screws (CAPS) being the most promising and beginning to be widely used. The use of CAPS in patients with osteoporosis strengthens screw fixation, decreases the incidence of screw loosening, and improves the fusion rate [2,3], thereby possibly reducing the extent of spinal fusion and directly contributing to minimizing surgical invasiveness; therefore, CAPS is consistent with the concept of minimally invasive spinal treatment.
However, while CAPS is being increasingly used, post-CAPS cement leakage is a considerable problem. Cement leakage into the spinal canal can cause spinal cord compression symptoms, including neurologic deficits and pain, while leakage into the epidural vein, vena cava, right atrium, pulmonary artery, or multiple lung arterioles can cause cardiac or pulmonary cement embolism (PCE) [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Since both embolisms have the same pathology, this study included cardiopulmonary cement embolisms after CAPS as CPCE. In addition, bone cement can cause an anaphylactic reaction, leading to shock and death. Heat associated with cement polymerization can also cause neurological damage [18]. However, only a few publications have reported the incidence of CPCE or CAPS-related complications, most in the form of case reports [2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. CPCE rates reported in past studies showed a wide prevalence range because it does not have a standard definition, and different studies used different methods to evaluate cement embolism [2].
Furthermore, the level of evidence from existing studies regarding CPCE after CAPS has been relatively low [2]. Hence, management protocols for post-CAPS CPCE remain unknown. This narrative review aimed to explore the incidence of and risk factors for CPCE and cement leakage-related complications after CAPS and to provide evidence for treatment strategies for CPCE after CAPS.

2. Methods

Two major types of CAPS were found depending on the screw type:
(1)
Conventional solid screws: cement-brushed solid screw inserted [19] or solid screw inserted after vertebroplasty [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,20,21,22,23].
(2)
Fenestrated screws (Figure 1): these can be cemented after screw placement [11,12,13,14,15,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46].
A narrative review based on PRISMA guidelines was performed by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane Library and PubMed databases between January 2000 and October 2022 [47,48]. Both MeSH terms and free-text keywords were utilized for searching for relevant articles without setting a minimum or maximum postoperative follow-up window. The search terms “fenestrated pedicle screw,” “cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw,” “cement-augmented pedicle screw,” “pulmonary embolus,” and “cement embolus” were applied to identify 56 available records for further evaluation. Case reports were also included to cover currently available information on the frequency, symptoms, and treatment of PE or PCE after CAPS fixation. In order to avoid overlooking additional studies, we searched the bibliography of selected articles. Data from the included articles were independently extracted by two reviewers. Data extracted from each article included baseline data (first author, year of publication, study type, sample size, country, level of manipulation, sex, age, solid or fenestrated screw, and amount of cement) and characteristics of PE after CAPS fixation (incidence, location, diagnostic method and criteria, treatment, and outcome and prognosis).
Studies investigating the presence of PE as an outcome or case reports of PE after spinal fusion with CAPS were included. The indications for surgery were open-ended to include all types of degenerative spinal conditions and fractures.
The following studies were excluded: Studies regarding patients undergoing spinal fusion with conventional screws without cement augmentation; review articles, non-English publications, and studies for which full texts were unavailable; in cases of data duplication, studies with the largest sample size were included and the rest excluded.

3. Results

This study included 28 case series and 14 case reports that met the inclusion criteria. Of the 1974 included cases (1960 from the case series and 14 from case reports), CPCE was noted in 123 (114 and 9), symptomatic CPCE in 35 (26 and 9), and death in six (5 and 1), respectively.

3.1. Characterisitics of CPCE after CAPS Fixation from the Case Studies

From the 28 case series studies (three prospective and 23 retrospective studies), PCE occurred in 6% (114/1960) of all patients with CAPS, 5.3% (22/419) with conventional solid screws, and 6% (81/1339) with fenestrated screws (Table 1).
Symptomatic PCE occurred in 1.3% (26/1960) of all patients after CAPS fixation, 3.1% (13/419) with conventional solid screws, and 0.8% (11/1339) with fenestrated screws.
The distribution of PCE incidence in all cases was 0–28.6% (<5%: 22 studies, 5–10%: five studies, 11–20%: one study, >20%: two studies) and 0–26% (<5%: 25 studies, 5–10%: none, 11–20%: none, >20%: one study, not available: one study), respectively. No cardiac embolism was observed.
Regarding the years reported, conventional solid screws were common from 2009 to 2017, while fenestrated screws were increasingly reported after 2018.
PCE diagnosis was evaluated by chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) in all cases in one article [34], chest CT in all cases in two [19,27], chest radiography in all cases in three [24,25,31], chest radiography in all cases and chest CT in selected patients in two [23,35], chest CT in selected patients in six [20,22,38,39,40,46], chest radiography or CT in selected cases in one [33], chest radiography and intraoperative transesophageal echo in one [41], and no clear description in 12 articles [21,26,28,29,30,32,36,37,42,43,44,45]. Seven patients required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) due to shock [23,34], and five patients died (four due to PE and one due to suspected cement-induced anaphylactic shock) [22,32,35,42].

3.2. Characteristics of CPCE after CAPS Placement from the Case Reports

Of the 14 case reports, conventional solid type screws were reported in seven studies [4,5,6,7,8,9,10], fenestrated screws in five [11,12,13,14,15], and the details were unknown in two [16,17] (Table 2). In terms of reporting years, six of the seven case reports on conventional solid screws were reported between 2010 and 2013, while four of the five case reports regarding fenestrated screws were reported after 2020. Regarding the number of CAPS inserted, four screws were inserted in seven studies [5,6,7,11,12,13,15], six in two [9,14], eight and 10 in one case report each [10,17], and the number was unknown in three [4,8,16]. Time of embolism detection was during surgery in three cases [4,15,17]; immediately after surgery in four [7,8,13,16]; 1 day after in two [10,11]; 2, 3, and 6 days after surgery in one case each [5,12,14]; and unknown in two [6,9]. Clinical presentation comprised cardiopulmonary symptoms (tachycardia, hypoxia, dyspnea, chest pain) in nine patients [5,7,8,10,11,12,13,14,16], two of whom required CPR [8,10]; asymptomatic presentation during surgery in three cases [4,15,17], and unknown details in two cases [6,9]. Cement leakage from the vertebral body into the inferior vena cava (IVC) was bilateral in two cases [13,17], right-sided in four [4,9,14,15], and unknown in eight [5,6,7,8,10,11,12,16]. PE was reported in 12 cases [4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,13,14,16,17] and cardiac (right atrial) embolism in two [10,15]. Management included anticoagulation in five cases [4,7,9,11,13], CPR in two [8,10], cement removal with a catheter using an endovascular approach in two [5,15], surgical cement removal in two [12,17], none and unknown in one [6], with death reported in one case [8] (Table 2).

4. Discussion

4.1. Rate and Diagnosis of CPCE after CAPS Fixation in the Case Series

In the CPCE case series, all cases were of PCE, with none reporting cardiac cement embolisms. The frequency of PCE after CAPS insertion in 28 studies (1960 cases) was 6% (114 cases) (range: 0–28.6%), of which 1.3% (26 cases) (range: 0–26%) was symptomatic.
The incidences of PCE and symptomatic PCE ranged from 0–28.6% and 0–26%, respectively, with both being widely distributed. The incidence of PCE after percutaneous vertebroplasty was reported as 2.3% (144/6251 cases) (range: 0–25%) in a systemic review, but the range was as wide as that in this study, presumably due to different study methods, etiology, and diagnostic criteria [49]. However, an incidence rate < 5% was noted in 22/28 studies regarding PCE and 25/28 studies regarding symptomatic PCE, a relatively low frequency, similar to that reported by Yagi et al. [2]. This could be attributed to the retrospective design in most (25/28) of the studies and their unclear definitions for PCE and underestimated incidence rates. Additionally, only three studies performed routine CT examinations for PCE diagnosis in all patients. Studies on the rate of PCE after percutaneous vertebroplasty have reported a radiographic diagnostic rate of 6.8% and a CT rate of 23% [50,51]. CT is highly sensitive in detecting PCE, especially peripheral PCEs of less than 4 mm in diameter [51]. Thus, we speculated that the wide range of PCE rates in our study and relatively low rates in most previous ones could be attributed to unclear PCE definitions and varying methods for PCE assessment among the studies reviewed (with only three studies utilizing routine CT scans). Therefore, the PCE rate was likely underestimated in most previous reports. On the other hand, the low frequency of symptomatic PCE and concerns regarding radiation exposure justify the need for postoperative chest radiography, even in asymptomatic patients. However, whether a CT scan with greater sensitivity to diagnose PCE is justified as a screening procedure remains unclear, similar to the discussion by Krueger et al. regarding the pros and cons of performing chest CT for PCE after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty [52].
According to the screw type, PCE incidence was similar for conventional solid (5.3%) and fenestrated (6%) screws. With respect to reporting years, conventional solid screws were reported more frequently before 2017, while fenestrated screws were increasingly reported after 2018. Although using conventional solid screws may be less expensive than using fenestrated screws, they may complicate the procedure. Once we begin inserting the solid screw into viscous cement, there is limited control over dealing with any leaks. If a leak occurs, the surgeon must decide whether to continue implantation or stop and pull the screw out completely, despite the continued leak [27]. Thus, since its introduction, the fenestrated pedicle screw has been widely used and continues to increase in popularity.

4.2. Symptoms of CPCE after CAPS Insertion

Symptoms are subclinical in most cases of PCE. The clinical picture of symptomatic PCE resembles that of a thrombotic PE: it is characterized by tachycardia, dyspnea, hypotension, loss of consciousness, and can lead to cardiopulmonary arrest and death.
Several studies have demonstrated postoperative lung injury with inflammatory features resulting from pulmonary cement deposition in patients undergoing cemented knee arthroplasty [53,54,55]. Most patients with osteoporosis eligible for CAPS were older adults, and older age was a risk factor for respiratory complications [41]. Additionally, since respiratory complications in older patients are a major cause of longer hospital stays and perioperative morbidity and mortality [56,57], symptomatic PCE with possible lung injury should be monitored for. On the other hand, cardiac cement embolism after CAPS fixation was reported in two cases in this study: one with chest pain [10] and the other diagnosed during CAPS insertion (without symptom presentation under anesthesia) [15]. Similar to our study, a significant number of case reports regarding PCE after percutaneous vertebroplasty have been reviewed; however, only a few isolated case reports regarding cardiac cement embolism exist in the literature, which have not been previously reviewed [58]. In cardiac cement embolism, cardiac perforation due to sharp cement fragments may necessitate pericardiocentesis or excision, and concomitant valvular disease with cement embolization may require additional valve replacement surgery, depending on the degree of regurgitation [58].

4.3. Pathology of CPCE after CAPS Placement

Three distinct pathological outcomes of symptomatic PCE after percutaneous vertebroplasty have been observed: (1) mechanical obstruction of the heart and lungs by cement fragments, (2) fat embolism syndrome caused by displacement of bone marrow particles into the vascular system by the injected cement, and (3) anaphylactic reaction to the cement [49].
(1)
Mechanical obstruction
The most common outcome is mechanical obstruction of the heart or lungs by cement fragments. The hydroxyapatite and allograft bone, used as additional reinforcements to strengthen the pedicle screw fixation, can also cause PE due to fat and bone marrow particles as well as from debris of material augmentation (hydroxyapatite and allograft bone) during screw insertion [59,60].
(2)
Fat embolism
Fatal fat embolism syndrome associated with isolated osteoporotic vertebral fractures [61], vertebroplasty [62], and simple pedicle screw fixation without augmentation hs been reported [63]. Both vertebral fractures and spinal surgeries can involve the bone marrow, increasing the intraosseous pressure, which dislodges fat and bone marrow contents into venous circulation, thereby causing systematic inflammation [59].
“Echogenic material,” reflecting bone marrow and fat, has been observed passing through the right atrium using echocardiography during the following steps of spinal surgery: (1) probing of the vertebral body [63], (2) placement of the pedicle screw [64,65], (3) insertion of hemostatic agents into the pedicle screw pilot hole [65,66], and (4) cement insertion during vertebroplasty [67] and fenestrated pedicle screw augmentation [41].
Although less frequent than mechanical obstruction, fatal cases of fat embolism syndrome without cement embolism after CAPS fixation [62] and death due to an anaphylactic reaction to cement [22] have been reported; therefore, spinal surgeons should pay attention to these conditions when managing patients during and after CAPS insertion.

4.4. Risk Factors for CPCE after CAPS Fixation

With regards screw type, CPCE may be mainly caused by the vertebroplasty procedure before screw placement for conventional solid type screws, and by the cement insertion procedure after screw placement for fenestrated screws. Despite only a few available studies regarding risk factors for embolism after CAPS fixation, the anatomical and technical aspects have been examined.

4.4.1. Anatomical Aspect

Some reports found that patients who received instrumentation in the thoracic or thoracolumbar spine were at significantly higher risk for PCE than those who received it in the lumbar spine [22,34]. A review of percutaneous vertebroplasty also found a higher incidence of PCE at the thoracic level than at the lumbar level. This could be possibly owing to the fact that in comparison with the lumbar bodies, thoracic vertebral bodies are smaller in size and closer to the cardiopulmonary vessels [49]. Although the number of studies (number of cases) reporting this issue are limited, this may be an anatomical note to keep in mind when performing CAPS. The relationship between the IVC and lumbar vein and characteristics of the lumbar vein need to be discerned, because intraoperative cement leakage into the IVC significantly contributes to PCE [68]. The lumbar veins enter the IVC at the L1-L5 vertebral positions, and cement flow into the IVC may result from the numerous connections to the vertebral and branch veins, lack of valves in the internal and external venous plexus, marked venous enlargement in older individuals, and lower pressure in the vertebral venous system than in the pelvic veins [34,68,69]. Iwanaga et al. demonstrated that latex or air injections into the lumbar vertebral bodies drain specifically into the IVC and not internally into the vertebral venous plexus within the vertebral canal [70]. This indicates that cement injection can similarly enter the IVC; therefore, the close relationship between the IVC and lumbar vein could be an anatomical risk factor for the occurrence of venous cement leakage. In addition, Guo et al. [46] noted that a right-sided approach was a risk factor, because leakage into the IVC after CAPS insertion was more common on the right side, supported by the anatomical location of the IVC anterior to the right of the lumbar vertebral body. In the current study, cement leakage from the vertebral body into the IVC was identified in two bilateral and five right-sided cases from 12 case reports regarding CPCE after CAPS fixation (with five unknown) (Table 2). Due to the anatomic configuration of the vertebral body and IVC, attention should be paid when cementing from the right anterior side during CAPS insertion.

4.4.2. Technical Aspect

Similar to percutaneous vertebroplasty, high cementing pressure, low cement viscosity, high cementing volume, and increased number of CAPS during CAPS insertion have been noted to be closely correlated with cement leakage and are reportedly risk factors for PCE [31,34].
Cement embolisms are more likely to occur when low-viscosity cement is injected at high pressure [31,34]. On the other hand, Frankel et al. reported no relationship between the number of CAPS used and PCE [24]. In this study, we reviewed case reports of symptomatic PCE; seven out of 14 cases utilized four CAPS with only the upper and lower ends fixed, and there was a risk of PCE even with minimal use of CAPS. Although selective cement reinforcement of cephalic and caudal pedicle screws appears to be a valuable strategy for reducing complications, the experience and knowledge of the surgeon, including not using low-viscosity cement and avoiding high-pressure injection, may influence the PCE risk more than the number of CAPS used.

4.5. Management of CPCE after CAPS Fixation

For prevention of CPCE after CAPS fixation, procedural precautions should include adequate fluoroscopy using a good-quality biplane fluoroscopy device to confirm the extent and direction of cement injection, careful use of the correct tap position, discontinuation of cement injection if any extra vertebral leakage is suspected, and performance by an experienced surgeon [41]. Considering the risk factors for cement leakage, minimizing the number of CAPS used by injecting high-viscosity, low-volume cement at low speed, and pressure is recommended [41]. From an anatomical standpoint, special attention should be paid to the CAPS placed within the right anterior section of the vertebral body, proximal to the IVC. Since PCE due to large cement emboli may be primarily related to aspects of the surgical approach, an improved surgical technique can potentially reduce cement leakage and the associated PCE. In the case reports reviewed in this study, most of the symptomatic CPCEs were detected during or immediately after CAPS insertion. In addition, fat embolism was also observed by echocardiography at the time of cement injection [41]. Therefore, aside from spinal surgeons, anesthesiologists must carefully note any sudden decrease in arterial blood pressure, oxygen saturation, or carbon dioxide concentration during or after cementation, which may be indicators of CPCE.
Although no clear guidelines for the management of PCE exist in the literature, it is generally agreed that treatment should be based on the presenting symptoms and location of the embolism [9,52,69].
For asymptomatic PCE, clinical follow-up without anticoagulant prescription has been recommended by some authors [51,71]. For symptomatic cases, initial anticoagulation with heparin and follow-up with coumarin therapy for 6 months has been suggested [5,7,11,13,16,17].
Emergency cardiovascular surgery, including interventional radiology or open/minimally invasive cardiac surgery, may be required in cases of main artery invasion or PCE trapped within the atrium [5,12,14,15,17]. Large cement emboli trapped within the pulmonary artery or atrium can sometimes be retrieved with endovascular procedures performed under fluoroscopy [5,15]. While percutaneous removal is an attractive procedure, open cardiovascular surgery may still be necessary for complete removal in cases of atrial perforation by cement fragments or large PCE [12,14,17]. Therefore, strict indications for CAPS implementation are necessary to minimize risk, because CAPS fixation is not an entirely safe procedure, particularly for patients with osteoporosis and concomitant cardiac or respiratory disease. CAPS should also be used with caution, especially in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation or endovascular therapy or open cardiovascular surgery.
This study had some limitations. First, since we only included publications written in English, a language bias may exist. Second, the diagnosis of PCE (especially asymptomatic PCE) may not have been standardized among the included reports. Finally, although vertebral fracture type, such as AO spine classification of thoracolumbar injuries [72]) may also be a risk factor for CAPS, this was not studied. Larger prospective studies need to be conducted to analyze whether thoracic level or vertebral fracture type could be independent risk factors for CAPS. Despite these limitations due to the nature of the literature review, our findings can potentially contribute to clinical practice.

5. Conclusions

The frequencies of PCE and symptomatic PCE after CAPS fixation are 6% (range: 0–28.6%) and 1.3% (range: 0–26%), respectively, with both being widely distributed. The definition of CPCE and method of data collection varied among the analyzed reports, which may have resulted in the wide range of frequencies. Since PCE due to large cement emboli may be primarily related to the surgical technique, improved technique, such as minimizing the number of CAPSs by injecting low-volume, high-viscosity cement at low velocity and pressure, and careful observation of cement leakage during CAPS insertion may reduce the PCE associated with cement leakage. Spinal surgeons should pay more attention to the occurrence of CPCE during and after CAPS insertion, which can cause serious complications in a minority of patients. Additional large-scale multicenter studies may be required to obtain more generalizable results of higher quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.M. and H.H.; methodology, T.M., H.H. and M.T.; formal analysis, T.K.; investigation, T.Y., Y.T. and T.K.; data curation, T.M., Y.T. and M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, T.M. and H.H.; writing—review and editing, T.M., H.H. and M.M.; visualization, T.M. and H.H.; supervision, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Imajo, Y.; Taguchi, T.; Yone, K.; Okawa, A.; Otani, K.; Ogata, T.; Ozawa, H.; Shimada, Y.; Neo, M.; Iguchi, T. Japanese 2011 nationwide survey on complications from spine surgery. J. Orthop. Sci. 2015, 20, 38–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Yagi, M.; Ogiri, M.; Holy, C.E.; Bourcet, A. Comparison of clinical effectiveness of fenestrated and conventional pedicle screws in patients undergoing spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2021, 18, 995–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sung, S.; Kwon, J.-W.; Park, T.H.; Lee, S.-B.; Moon, S.-H.; Lee, B.H. Biomechanical Comparison and Three-Dimensional Analysis of Cement Distribution Patterns for Different Pedicle Screw Designs. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Akinola, B.; Lutchman, L.; Barker, P.; Rai, A. Pulmonary Cement Embolism during Cement Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Case Report. J. Orthop. Surg. 2010, 18, 364–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rasch, A.; Sindermann, J.; Scheld, H.H.; Hoffmeier, A. Pulmonary Palacos Embolism: A Case Report. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2010, 58, 437–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Röllinghoff, M.; Siewe, J.; Eysel, P.; Delank, K.-S. Pulmonary cement embolism after augmentation of pedicle screws with bone cement. Acta Orthop. Belg. 2010, 76, 269–273. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tonolini, M.; Bianco, R. Pulmonary cement embolism after pedicle screw vertebral stabilization. J. Emerg. Trauma Shock. 2012, 5, 272–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zheng, N.; Liang, M.; Zhang, H.D.; Zhu, S.H.; Yang, T.T.; Zhuo, L.; Wang, G.F.; Liu, H.X.; Liu, L. Fatal extensive bone cement embolism: Histological findings confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Forensic Sci. Int. 2013, 229, e23–e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ignacio, J.M.F.; Ignacio, S.D. Pulmonary Bone Cement Embolism following Pedicle Screw Instrumentation with Bone Cement Augmentation for a Burst Fracture of L1 in a Non-Osteoporotic Spine. Acta Med. Philipp. 2013, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rahimizadeh, A.; Hassani, V.; Soufiani, H.; Rahimizadeh, A.; Karimi, M.; Asgari, N. Symptomatic pulmonary cement embolism after pedicle screw polymethylmethacrylate cement augmentation: A case report and review. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2020, 11, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zalay, M.; Özkoç, G. Pulmonary Cement Embolism After Segmental Polymethyl Methacrylate-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation. J. Turk Spinal Surg. 2012, 23, 233–240. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hong, S.W.; Oh, T.-H.; Jeon, J.M.; Lee, Y.-S.; Kim, K.-T. Cardiac Perforation Caused by Bone Cements as a Complication of Cement Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation Using the Fenestrated Pedicle Screw: A Case Report. Korean J. Neurotrauma 2020, 16, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gomez, F.A.; Herrera, O.M.; Gaona, J.L.V.; Reyes, C.A.F.; Gutiérrez, M.L.C.; Saenz, L.C.M. Pulmonary cement embolism following transpedicular screws placement for thoracolumbar fractures. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2021, 12, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liang, T.-Z.; Zhu, H.-P.; Gao, B.; Peng, Y.; Gao, W.-J. Intracardiac, pulmonary cement embolism in a 67-year-old female after cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation: A case report and review of literature. World J. Clin. Cases 2021, 9, 3120–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Takahashi, S.; Sohgawa, E.; Suzuki, A.; Yamamoto, A.; Sasaki, R.; Tanaka, K.; Terai, H.; Hoshino, M.; Toyoda, H.; Tamai, K.; et al. Percutaneous Endovascular Retrieval of Large Cement Leakage into the Right Atrium Following Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Instrumentation. Spine Surg. Relat. Res. 2021, 5, 446–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hemmer, C. Abnormal Chest X-ray and Computed Tomography Post–Lumbar Fusion. J. Nurse Pr. 2015, 11, 276–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Andrä, M.; Baumer, H.; Mittergradnegger, F.; Laschitz, M.; Petek, T.; Wandschneider, W. Life-Threatening Cardiac Perforation After Posterior Spondylodesis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2017, 104, e355–e357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Barragán-Campos, H.M.; Vallée, J.-N.; Lo, D.; Cormier, E.; Jean, B.; Rose, M.; Astagneau, P.; Chiras, J. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Spinal Metastases: Complications. Radiology 2006, 238, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aydogan, M.; Ozturk, C.; Karatoprak, O.; Tezer, M.; Aksu, N.; Hamzaoglu, A. The Pedicle Screw Fixation With Vertebroplasty Augmentation in the Surgical Treatment of the Severe Osteoporotic Spines. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 2009, 22, 444–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sawakami, K.; Yamazaki, A.; Ishikawa, S.; Ito, T.; Watanabe, K.; Endo, N. Polymethylmethacrylate Augmentation of Pedicle Screws Increases the Initial Fixation in Osteoporotic Spine Patients. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 2012, 25, E28–E35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seo, J.H.; Ju, C.I.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, J.K.; Shin, H. Clinical Efficacy of Bone Cement Augmented Screw Fixation for the Severe Osteoporotic Spine. Korean J. Spine 2012, 9, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Janssen, I.; Ryang, Y.-M.; Gempt, J.; Bette, S.; Gerhardt, J.; Kirschke, J.S.; Meyer, B. Risk of cement leakage and pulmonary embolism by bone cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation of the thoracolumbar spine. Spine J. 2017, 17, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Erdem, M.N.; Karaca, S.; Sarı, S.; Yumrukcal, F.; Tanli, R.; Aydogan, M. Application of cement on strategic vertebrae in the treatment of the osteoporotic spine. Spine J. 2017, 17, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Frankel, M.B.M.; Jones, M.T.; Wang, C. Segmental polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation in patients with bone softening caused by osteoporosis and metastatic tumor involvement. Neurosurgery 2007, 61, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moon, B.J.; Cho, B.Y.; Choi, E.Y.; Zhang, H.Y. Polymethylmethacrylate-Augmented Screw Fixation for Stabilization of the Osteoporotic Spine: A Three-Year Follow-Up of 37 Patients. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2009, 46, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lubansu, A.; Rynkowski, M.; Abeloos, L.; Appelboom, G.; Dewitte, O. Minimally Invasive Spinal Arthrodesis in Osteoporotic Population Using a Cannulated and Fenestrated Augmented Screw: Technical Description and Clinical Experience. Minim. Invasive Surg. 2012, 2012, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. El Saman, A.; Kelm, A.; Meier, S.; Sander, A.L.; Eichler, K.; Marzi, I.; Laurer, H. Intraoperative PEEP-ventilation during PMMA-injection for augmented pedicle screws: Improvement of leakage rate in spinal surgery. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2013, 39, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pesenti, S.; Blondel, B.; Peltier, E.; Adetchessi, T.; Dufour, H.; Fuentes, S. Percutaneous Cement-Augmented Screws Fixation in the Fractures of the Aging Spine: Is It the Solution? BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Klingler, J.-H.; Scholz, C.; Kogias, E.; Sircar, R.; Krüger, M.T.; Volz, F.; Scheiwe, C.; Hubbe, U. Minimally Invasive Technique for PMMA Augmentation of Fenestrated Screws. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dai, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Sun, D.; Luo, F.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, J. Surgical treatment of the osteoporotic spine with bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw fixation: Technical description and preliminary application in 43 patients. Clinics 2015, 70, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mueller, J.U.; Baldauf, J.; Marx, S.; Kirsch, M.; Schroeder, H.W.S.; Pillich, D.T. Cement leakage in pedicle screw augmentation: A prospective analysis of 98 patients and 474 augmented pedicle screws. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2016, 25, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Girardo, M.; Rava, A.; Fusini, F.; Gargiulo, G.; Coniglio, A.; Cinnella, P. Different pedicle osteosynthesis for thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in elderly patients. Eur. Spine J. 2018, 27, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rong, Z.; Zhang, F.; Xiao, J.; Wang, Z.; Luo, F.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, J.; Dai, F. Application of Cement-Injectable Cannulated Pedicle Screw in Treatment of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Compression Fracture (AO Type A): A Retrospective Study of 28 Cases. World Neurosurg. 2018, 120, e247–e258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ulusoy, O.L.; Kahraman, S.; Karalok, I.; Kaya, E.; Enercan, M.; Sever, C.; Abay, B.; Karadereler, S.; Hamzaoglu, A. Pulmonary cement embolism following cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw fixation in adult spinal deformity patients with severe osteoporosis (analysis of 2978 fenestrated screws). Eur. Spine J. 2018, 27, 2348–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ishak, B.; Bajwa, A.A.; Schneider, T.; Tubbs, R.S.; Iwanaga, J.; Ramey, W.L.; Unterberg, A.W.; Kiening, K.L. Early Complications and Cement Leakage in Elderly Patients Who Have Undergone Intraoperative Computed Tomography (CT)-Guided Cement Augmented Pedicle Screw Placement: Eight-Year Single-Center Experience. World Neurosurg. 2019, 128, e975–e981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Rong, Z.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, J.; Dai, F. Clinical evaluation of a bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw augmented with polymethylmethacrylate: 128 osteoporotic patients with 42 months of follow-up. Clinics 2019, 74, e346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Barzilai, O.; McLaughlin, L.; Lis, E.; Reiner, A.S.; Bilsky, M.H.; Laufer, I. Utility of Cement Augmentation via Percutaneous Fenestrated Pedicle Screws for Stabilization of Cancer-Related Spinal Instability. Oper. Neurosurg. 2018, 16, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gazzeri, R.; Panagiotopoulos, K.; Galarza, M.; Bolognini, A.; Callovini, G. Minimally invasive spinal fixation in an aging population with osteoporosis: Clinical and radiological outcomes and safety of expandable screws versus fenestrated screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. Neurosurg. Focus 2020, 49, E14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Y.-Y.; Xiao, J.; Yin, X.; Liu, M.-Y.; Zhao, J.-H.; Liu, P.; Dai, F. Clinical efficacy of Bone Cement-injectable Cannulated Pedicle Screw Short Segment Fixation for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Osteoporosise. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Tang, Y.-C.; Guo, H.; Guo, D.-Q.; Luo, P.-J.; Li, Y.-X.; Mo, G.-Y.; Ma, Y.-H.; Peng, J.-C.; Liang, D.; Zhang, S.-C. Effect and potential risks of using multilevel cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic spine with lumbar degenerative disease. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020, 21, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rodriguez-Arguisjuela, M.; Martin-Piñeiro, B.; Cuéllar-Bobadilla, C.; Leal-Caramanzana, V.; Heili-Frades, S.; Mahíllo-Fernandez, I.; Mengis, C.-L.; Gallego-Bustos, J.; Peiro, A.; Garzon-Márquez, F.M.; et al. Lung injury in patients age 75 years and older with the use of polymethylmethacrylate fenestrated pedicle screws. Spine J. 2020, 21, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rava, A.; Coniglio, A.; Fusini, F.; Colò, G.; Massè, A.; Girardo, M. Effectiveness and reliability of cannulated fenestrated screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate cement in the surgical treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. J. Craniovertebral Junction Spine 2021, 12, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Massaad, E.; Rolle, M.; Hadzipasic, M.; Kiapour, A.; Shankar, G.M.; Shin, J.H. Safety and efficacy of cement augmentation with fenestrated pedicle screws for tumor-related spinal instability. Neurosurg. Focus 2021, 50, E12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ehresman, J.; Pennington, Z.; Elsamadicy, A.A.; Hersh, A.; Lubelski, D.; Lehner, K.; Cottrill, E.; Schilling, A.; Lakomkin, N.; Ahmed, A.K.; et al. Fenestrated pedicle screws for thoracolumbar instrumentation in patients with poor bone quality: Case series and systematic review of the literature. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2021, 206, 106675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wagner, A.; Haag, E.; Joerger, A.-K.; Gempt, J.; Krieg, S.M.; Wostrack, M.; Meyer, B. Cement-Augmented Carbon Fiber–Reinforced Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Spinal Metastases: Safety and Efficacy. World Neurosurg. 2021, 154, e536–e546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guo, H.-Z.; Tang, Y.-C.; Guo, D.-Q.; Zhang, S.-C.; Li, Y.-X.; Mo, G.-Y.; Luo, P.-J.; Zhou, T.-P.; Ma, Y.-H.; Liang, D.; et al. The cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in degenerative lumbosacral diseases: A retrospective analysis of 202 cases and 950 augmented pedicle screws. Eur. Spine J. 2019, 28, 1661–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gotzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Healthcare Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. BMJ (Clin. Res. Ed.) 2009, 339, b2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int. J. Surg. 2021, 88, 105906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, H.-B.; Jing, X.-S.; Shan, J.-L.; Bao, L.; Wang, D.-C.; Tang, H. Risk factors for pulmonary cement embolism associated with percutaneous vertebral augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Surg. 2022, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, Y.-L.; Chen, W.-C.; Chou, C.-W.; Chen, J.-W.; Chang, C.-M.; Lai, Y.-S.; Cheng, C.-K.; Wang, S.-T. Biomechanical study of expandable pedicle screw fixation in severe osteoporotic bone comparing with conventional and cement-augmented pedicle screws. Med. Eng. Phys. 2014, 36, 1416–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, Y.J.; Lee, J.W.; Park, K.W.; Yeom, J.-S.; Jeong, H.S.; Park, J.M.; Kang, H.S. Pulmonary Cement Embolism after Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: Incidence, Characteristics, and Risk Factors. Radiology 2009, 251, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Krueger, A.; Bliemel, C.; Zettl, R.; Ruchholtz, S. Management of pulmonary cement embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: A systematic review of the literature. Eur. Spine J. 2009, 18, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Berman, A.T.; Parmet, J.L.; Harding, S.P.; Israelite, C.L.; Chandrasekaran, K.; Horrow, J.C.; Singer, R.; Rosenberg, H. Emboli Observed with Use of Transesophageal Echocardiography Immediately after Tourniquet Release during Total Knee Arthroplasty with Cement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1998, 80, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Parmet, J.L.; Berman, A.T.; Horrow, J.C.; Harding, S.; Rosenberg, H. Thromboembolism Coincident with Tourniquet Deflation During Total Knee Arthroplasty. Lancet 1993, 341, 1057–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. McGrath, B.J.; Hsia, J.; Boyd, A.; Shay, P.; Graeter, J.; Conry, K.; Campbell, D.; Naulty, S.J. Venous Embolization After Deflation of Lower Extremity Tourniquets. Obstet. Anesthesia Dig. 1994, 78, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lawrence, V.A.; Cornell, J.E.; Smetana, G.W. Strategies To Reduce Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Noncardiothoracic Surgery: Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 144, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Qaseem, A.; Snow, V.; Fitterman, N.; Hornbake, E.R.; Lawrence, V.A.; Smetana, G.W.; Weiss, K.; Owens, D.K.; Aronson, M.; Barry, P.; et al. Risk Assessment for and Strategies to Reduce Perioperative Pulmonary Complications for Patients Undergoing Noncardiothoracic Surgery: A Guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 144, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shridhar, P.; Chen, Y.; Khalil, R.; Plakseychuk, A.; Cho, S.K.; Tillman, B.; Kumta, P.N.; Chun, Y. A Review of PMMA Bone Cement and Intra-Cardiac Embolism. Materials 2016, 9, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Morimoto, T.M.; Kobayashi, T.; Yoshihara, T.M.; Tsukamoto, M.; Kai, K.M.; Mawatari, M.M. Fatal fat embolism syndrome during posterior spinal fusion surgery. Medicine 2021, 100, e28381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Satake, K.; Kanemura, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Matsumoto, A. Pulmonary Embolism After Vertebroplasty with Use of Hydroxyapatite Blocks. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2013, 3, e132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lastra, R.R.; Saldanha, V.; Balasubramanian, M.; Handal, J. Fatal fat embolism in isolated vertebral compression fracture. Eur. Spine J. 2010, 19, 200–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Temple, J.D.; Ludwig, S.C.; Ross, W.K.; Marshall, W.K.; Larsen, L.; Gelb, D.E. Catastrophic fat embolism following augmentation of pedicle screws with bone cement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2002, 84, 639–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Takahashi, S.; Kitagawa, H.; Ishii, T. Intraoperative pulmonary embolism during spinal instrumentation surgery. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2003, 85, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aebli, N.; Krebs, J.; Davis, G.; Walton, M.; Williams, M.J.A.; Theis, J.-C. Fat Embolism and Acute Hypotension During Vertebroplasty. Spine 2002, 27, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kuhns, C.A.; Cook, C.R.; Dodam, J.R.; Leach, S.B.; Kuroki, K.; Jenkins, T.J.; Tallmage, A.M.; Hoernschemeyer, D.G. Injectable Gelatin Used as Hemostatic Agent to Stop Pedicle Bleeding in Long Deformity Surgical Procedures. Spine 2015, 40, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Duplantier, N.L.; Couch, M.; Emory, L.; Zavatsky, J.M. Cardiac Emboli Documented by Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiogram During Administration of a Topical Hemostatic Agent Prior to Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy. Spine 2016, 41, E556–E560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Syed, M.; Jan, S.; Patel, N.; Shaikh, A.; Marsh, R.; Stewart, R. Fatal Fat Embolism after Vertebroplasty: Identification of the High-Risk Patient. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2006, 27, 343–345. [Google Scholar]
  68. Han, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, M. Case report: Cement entrapped in the inferior vena cava filter after pedicle screw augmentation. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kerry, G.; Ruedinger, C.; Steiner, H.-H. Cement embolism into the venous system after pedicle screw fixation: Case report, literature review, and prevention tips. Orthop. Rev. 2013, 5, e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Iwanaga, J.; Rustagi, T.; Ishak, B.; Johal, J.; David, G.; Reina, M.A.; Dumont, A.S.; Tubbs, R.S. Venous Drainage of Lumbar Vertebral Bodies: Anatomic Study with Application to Kyphoplasty, Vertebroplasty, and Pedicle Screw Complications. World Neurosurg. 2020, 137, e286–e290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Choe, D.H.; Marom, E.M.; Ahrar, K.; Truong, M.T.; Madewell, J.E. Pulmonary Embolism of Polymethyl Methacrylate During Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004, 183, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Vu, C.; Gendelberg, D. Classifications in Brief: AO Thoracolumbar Classification System. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2019, 478, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Medicina 59 00407 g001 550
Figure 1. Fenestrated screws (a) Expedium VerseⓇ spinal system and Vertecem V+Ⓡ cement (DePuy Synthes Products, Inc., Raynham, MA, USA), (b) Case illustration: preoperative lumbar X-ray, 82-year-old man with L1 vertebral fracture pseudarthrosis in the osteoporotic spine (T= −2SD). (c) Case illustration: postoperative lumbar X-ray. L1vertebroplasty and T12-L2 posterior fusion with cement-augmented fenestrated screws was performed.
Figure 1. Fenestrated screws (a) Expedium VerseⓇ spinal system and Vertecem V+Ⓡ cement (DePuy Synthes Products, Inc., Raynham, MA, USA), (b) Case illustration: preoperative lumbar X-ray, 82-year-old man with L1 vertebral fracture pseudarthrosis in the osteoporotic spine (T= −2SD). (c) Case illustration: postoperative lumbar X-ray. L1vertebroplasty and T12-L2 posterior fusion with cement-augmented fenestrated screws was performed.
Medicina 59 00407 g001
Table
Table 1. Summary of study characteristics.
Table 1. Summary of study characteristics.
Authors, YearNationalityStudy DesignSampleMen: WomenMean Age (Years)Number of CAPS UsedEvaluation Method for PCEIncidence of PCE n (%)No of Symptomatic PCE n (%)Symptoms, Progression, and Treatment of PCEFatal Cases (Cause)
Conventional solid screw fixation
Aydogan et al., 2009 [20]TurkeyRetrospective4912:2466 (59 to 78) NAChest CT in selected patients (oxygen saturation <95% at room air)1(2%)0NA0
Sawakami et al., 2012 [19]JapanRetrospective175:1273.8NAChest CT in all patients00NA0
Seo et al., 2012 [21]KoreaRetrospective15749:10866.5(49 to 74)947NA00NA0
Janssen et al., 2017 [22]GermanyRetrospective16562:10371 (46 to 93)1330Chest CT in selected patients13(7.9%)5(3%)Four patients experienced life-threatening hemodynamic reactions, cement embolism (n = 2) or anaphylactic shock (n = 2), and three required intraoperative CPR2 (fulminant PCE)
Erdem et al., 2017 [23]TurkeyRetrospective315:26NA149Chest radiography in all patients, Chest CT in selected patients8(26%)8(26%)Eight patients had chest discomfort 0
Fenestrated screw fixation
Frankel et al., 2007 [24]USARetrospective236:1764.7NAChest radiography in all patients1(4.3%)0NA0
Moon et al., 2009 [25]KoreaRetrospective372:3768.7168Chest radiography in all patients00NA0
Lubansu et al., 2012 [26]BelgiumProspective153:1271.278NA00NA0
El Saman et al., 2013 [27]GermanyRetrospective4216:2674 (57 to 89)311Chest CT in all patients12(28.6%)NANo life-threatening symptoms0
Pesenti et al., 2014 [28]FranceRetrospective125:077396NA1(2.7%)0NA0
Klingler et al., 2015 [29]GermanyRetrospective3510:2572.885NA00NA0
Dai et al., 2015 [30]ChinaRetrospective4313:3067.7NRNA00NA0
Mueller et al., 2016 [31]GermanyRetrospective9838:6070.6474Chest radiography in all patients4(4%)0NA0
Girardo et al., 2018 [32] ItalyRetrospective326:2676.9224NA1(3.1%)1(3.1%)NA1(embolism)
Rong et al., 2018 [33]ChinaRetrospective289:1960.5161Chest radiography or CT in selected patients00NA0
Ulusoy et al., 2018 [34]TurkeyRetrospective28177:204 70.5 (51 to 89) 2978Chest radiography and CT in all patients46(16.3%)4(1.4%)All four patients with symptomatic PCE required CPR0
Ishak et al., 2019 [35]USARetrospective8623 6473.4458Chest radiography in all and chest CT in selected patients4(5%)2(2.3%)Anticoagulation therapy1(cement-induced anaphylactic shock)
Wang et al., 2019 [36]ChinaRetrospective12829:9960.7418NA00NA0
Barzilai et al., 2019 [37]USARetrospective5330 2363.5216NA3(6%)0NA0
Gazzeri et al., 2020 [38]SpainProspective209:1171.3 (60 to 79)NAChest CT in selected patients00NA0
Liu et al. 2020 [39]ChinaRetrospective239:1463.385Chest CT in selected patients00NA0
Tang et al., 2020 [40]ChinaRetrospective467:3970.6336Chest CT in selected patients2(4.3%)1(0.2%)dyspnea and hypoxia, anticoagulation0
Rodriguez-Arguisjuela et al., 2021 [41]SpainProspective2511:1476.2NAChest radiography, TTE, and arterial blood gas in all patients00NA0
Coniglio et al., 2021 [42]ItalyRetrospective16358:10571.3(65 to 82)1109NA1(0.6%)1(0.6%)NA1(embolism)
Massaad et al.,2021 [43]USARetrospective6938 3164.7502NA1(1.4%)0NA0
Ehresman et al., 2021 [44]USARetrospective3818:2067.9252NA2(5.2%)1(2.6%)NA0
Wagner A et al., 2021 [45]GermanyRetrospective4216:2674 (57 to 89)293NA3(5.9%)1(2%)NA0
Conventional solid screw and fenestrated screw
Guo et al., 2019 [46]ChinaRetrospective20224:1786639950Chest CT in selected pts11(4.7%)2(1%)One patient had dyspnea and one, tightness of the chest0
Abbreviations: CAPS: cement-augmented pedicle screw, NA: not available, CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation, TTE: transesophageal echocardiography, CT: computed tomography, PCE: pulmonary cement embolism.
Table
Table 2. Summary of reported cardiopulmonary embolism caused by cement-augmented pedicle screw.
Table 2. Summary of reported cardiopulmonary embolism caused by cement-augmented pedicle screw.
Authors, YearAge (Years)/sexAugmented Vertebral LevelsNumber of CAPS UsedTime of Embolism Detection Clinical PresentationLeft-Right Difference in Cement Leakage from the Vertebrae to the Inferior Vena CavaLocalization of Cardiopulmonary Cement EmbolismManagementOutcome
Conventional solid type
Akinola et al., 2010 [4]76/ML3-5NAduring surgeryNo symptomRightBilateral pulmonary arteries in CTAnticoagulation therapyGood
Recovery
Rasch et al., 2010 [5]55/ML3-442 days after surgeryTachycardia, dyspnea, hypoxiaNARight pulmonary artery and upper left lung lobe in CTCement removal with catheter using endovascular approachGood
Recovery
Röllinghoff et al., 2010 [6] 69/MT8-L14NANANAMultiple arterioles in both lungs in CTNAGood
Recovery
Tonolini et al., 2012 [7] 75/FL1-34Immediately after surgeryTachycardia, dyspnea, hypoxiaNARight pulmonary artery and upper right lung lobe in CTAnticoagulation therapyGood
Recovery
Zheng et al., 2013 [8] 47/FT1-4, T9NAImmediately after surgeryDyspnea, hypotension, unconsciousnessNAMultiple pulmonary arterioles during autopsyCPR Death
Ignacio et al., 2013 [9] 34/MT12-L26NANARightCentral pulmonary artery in CTAnticoagulation therapyGood
Recovery
Rahimizadeh et al., 2020 [10] Middle age/FL2-S81 day after surgeryCardiopulmonary arrestNALeft pulmonary artery and middle left lung lobe in CTCPR, anticoagulation therapyGood
Recovery
Fenestrated type
Özalay et al., 2013 [11] 75/FL3-541 day after surgeryslight fever, chest pain, breathing difficultyNARight pulmonary artery and middle right lung lobe in CTAnticoagulation therapyGood
Recovery
Hong et al., 2020 [12] 67/FL4-546 days after surgerychest painNAMultiple arterioles in both lungs in CT and penetrating the right atriumSurgical cement removalGood
Recovery
Gomez et al., 2021 [13] 64/FT9-L14Immediately after surgeryHypoxiaBilateralBoth pulmonary arteries in CTAnticoagulation therapyGood
Recovery
Liang et al., 2021 [14] 67/ML4-S163 days after surgeryHypoxiaRightRight pulmonary artery and lower left lung lobe in CTSurgical cement removalGood
Recovery
Takahashi et al., 2021 [15]75/FT11-L24during surgeryNo symptomRightMigrating into the right atrium in transesophageal echocardiographyCement removal with catheter using endovascular approachGood
Recovery
Unknown type
Hemmer et al., 2015 [16] 64/ML3-5NAImmediately after surgeryThe patient felt a little windedNALeft pulmonary artery and upper left lung lobe in CTNoneGood
Recovery
Andrä et al., 2017 [17] 62/FT11-L310during surgeryNo symptomBilateralPenetrating the right atrium in CTSurgical cement removal Good
Recovery
Abbreviations: NA: not available, CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CAPS: cement-augmented pedicle screw, CT: computed tomography.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morimoto, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Hirata, H.; Tsukamoto, M.; Yoshihara, T.; Toda, Y.; Mawatari, M. Cardiopulmonary Cement Embolism Following Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Narrative Review. Medicina 2023, 59, 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020407

AMA Style

Morimoto T, Kobayashi T, Hirata H, Tsukamoto M, Yoshihara T, Toda Y, Mawatari M. Cardiopulmonary Cement Embolism Following Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Narrative Review. Medicina. 2023; 59(2):407. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020407

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morimoto, Tadatsugu, Takaomi Kobayashi, Hirohito Hirata, Masatsugu Tsukamoto, Tomohito Yoshihara, Yu Toda, and Masaaki Mawatari. 2023. "Cardiopulmonary Cement Embolism Following Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Narrative Review" Medicina 59, no. 2: 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020407

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop