Next Article in Journal
The Learning Curve of Surgery of Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment—A Retrospective, Comparative Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Fetal Type of Posterior Cerebral Artery
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Prenatal and Postnatal Exposure to 50-Hz and 3 mT Electromagnetic Field on Rat Testicular Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological Peculiarities of the Pelvic Autonomic Nervous System and Their Impact on Clinical Interventions in the Lesser Pelvic Region

1
Institute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Sasinkova 4, 81108 Bratislava, Slovakia
2
Medico-Legal Department of Health Care Surveillance Authority, Antolská 11, 85107 Bratislava, Slovakia
3
Faculty of Nursing and Professional Health Studies, Slovak Medical University, Limbová 12, 83303 Bratislava, Slovakia
4
Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, University Hospital, Limbová 5, 83305 Bratislava, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(1), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010072
Submission received: 29 October 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 26 December 2022 / Published: 29 December 2022

Abstract

:
Background: The aim of the work is to define the morphological peculiarities of the pelvic autonomic nervous system (ANS) and their importance in the clinical and surgical interventions in the lesser pelvis. Material and methods: Anatomical variations in the formation of the pelvic ANS were observed in 20 cadavers. The study included 17 men (85%), aged 18 to 84, and 3 women, aged 27 to 86. The average age was 53.8 years. The subjects most often died by violent death in car accidents, by asphyxia, or by sudden death. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Health Care Surveillance Authority, Bratislava, Slovakia. We studied cadavers without congenital or detected anomalies, cancer, deformities of the body, or spinal or abdominal surgeries within 24 h of death. We observed a relationship between the dimensions and the number of ganglia, as well as the number and course of nerve branches and anastomoses. In the pelvic area, we observed the hypogastric plexus superior, hypogastric plexus inferior, and the truncus sympathicus. In all cadavers, we clarified the lumbosacral plexuses after evisceration. In the lumbosacral region, the roots were defined based on their participation in the formation of the plexuses. To show the intimate relationship between both systems, we also focused on the details of the structure (rami communicantes) related to the connections of the ANS with the spinal nervous system. Results: Anatomical variations in the formation of the pelvic ANS were observed in all cases. We included cases with more than two truncus sympathicus ganglia as the segmental type. The segmental form occurred in 14 (70%) cases, and was concentrated in 6 (30%) cases. Rami communicantes provided anastomoses to the spinal nerves. Small ganglia were observed on the rami communicantes. With the concentrated type, we observed the division of the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems. With the segmental and concentrated forms, symptoms of the “diffuse form” may occur, which we observed in all cases. We observed significant right-left asymmetry and differences in the formation of ganglia and anastomoses. Conclusions: This study allowed us to identify and describe the morphological peculiarities of the pelvic ANS and their possible influence on the clinical picture. Asymmetry and dependence of their occurrence on the type of ANS was observed. The variations were frequent. Their preoperative diagnosis is difficult to impossible. The absence or lack of intraoperative vigilance can lead to the damage of pelvic ANS during operations and blockades of the pelvic plexus. The acquired knowledge can be helpful in clarifying clinical signs and symptoms of these conditions.

1. Introduction

The human body exhibits a certain degree of differences and variations, especially in terms of its shape and structure. Anatomical variations are very interesting and thought-provoking for anatomists, pathologists, forensic physicians, and clinicians. There are different types of anatomical variants and peculiarities. They can be frequent, infrequent, or rare (sporadic). Frequent variations can even reach up to 100% occurrence. Many anatomical variants do not require clinical attention, but some may present diagnostic problems or cause adverse clinical symptoms [1].
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is a division of the peripheral nervous system, the system of nerves and ganglia that innervates the blood vessels, heart, smooth muscles, viscera, and glands, controlling their involuntary functions, consisting of both sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions. The innervation of the human pelvis has been the subject of numerous studies and reports by scientists who study cadavers. Despite the fact that these studies have been conducted over a long period of time, the information regarding the structure, course, and range of innervation of the hypogastric plexuses still remains scant. Knowledge of the structure of the pelvic ANS plexus must be the basis for a correct understanding of ANS disorders. These peculiarities can explain the contradiction and diversity of clinical manifestations. We have come across literature and scientific publications devoted to this issue. Only rarely did we come across manuscripts focused on bilateral morphological deviations in the formation of the pelvic plexus. Anatomical, and especially surgical, textbooks usually do not pay enough attention to the anatomical peculiarities of the formation of the pelvic plexus, which can complicate the solution of many pathologies and consequently, medical and nursing care [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
The integrity of the pelvic autonomic nervous system is essential for proper bowel, bladder, and sexual function. In pelvic surgery, dysfunctions of both the anatomical structures and sexual functions are known to be caused by iatrogenic lesions of the inferior hypogastric plexus (IHP), as the pelvic ANS is difficult to define and dissect. The inferior hypogastric plexus is a paired plexus of autonomic nerves and ganglia that supplies the viscera of pelvic cavity. Limited visibility in the lesser pelvis may complicate the identification and sparing of the autonomic nerves, and therefore requires the meticulous planning and execution of surgery. The inferior hypogastric plexus lends its clinical relevance to various urogenital pain syndromes, including prostatitis, endometriosis, chronic sacral pain, and rectal pain. Therefore, any surgical procedure in this anatomical area must be addressed with due diligence with respect to the pelvic plexus, which may be inadvertently damaged. Its damage may cause a slew of related postoperative symptoms (digestive symptoms, chronic pelvic pain, and sexual dysfunction), as well as compromise the pelvic autonomic innervation. Interest in the precise anatomy of the pelvic plexus and IHP increased with the introduction of the telerobotic method of treatment, where magnification and perfect lighting allow for easier preservation of the neural structures [3,5,11,12,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].
Regarding this, we conducted the study dealing with morphological anatomical variations of the pelvic ANS bilaterally, in the terms of diagnosis and clinical impact.

2. Materials and Methods

Detailed dissections were performed on 20 cadavers. The study included 17 men (85%), aged 18 to 84, and 3 women (15%), aged 27 to 86. The average age was 53.8 years. The subjects most often died by violent death in car accidents, by asphyxia, or by sudden death. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics, Arbitration, and Disciplinary Committee of the Health Care Surveillance Authority (Approval Code 3/2022). We studied cadavers without congenital or detected anomalies, cancer, deformities of the body, or spinal or abdominal surgeries within 24 h of death. In all of subjects, the pelvic plexus was clarified bilaterally. The body was lying down. Access to the neural structures of the abdominal cavity and pelvis was obtained through a longitudinal incision in the midline, from the jugular fossa to the symphysis. In the pelvic area, we observed the hypogastric plexus superior, hypogastric plexus inferior, and truncus sympathicus.
After retroperitoneal clarification of the pelvic splanchnic nerves entering the pelvic plexus from the anterior, lateral, and laterocaudal approach, we dissected the pelvic plexus and nerve structures innervating the bladder, prostate, seminal vesicles, and rectum. In women, we dissected the uterus and vagina. By pressing on the lower pole of the scrotum, we pushed the testis and epididymis upwards and visualized the plexus spermaticus and plexus deferentialis. The fascial structures covering the sacral nerve roots were excised. The parasympathetic nerve roots were identified using the distance from the anterior nerve roots S2–S4 and dissected along their course forward to their exit at the lateral border of the rectum. In all cadavers, we clarified the lumbosacral plexuses after evisceration. In the lumbosacral region, the roots were defined based on their participation in the formation of the plexuses. To show the intimate relationship of both systems, we also focused on the details of the structure (rami communicantes) related to the connections of the ANS with the spinal nervous system. Histological techniques (hematoxylin and eosin) were used to reliably identify ganglia obtained during dissections to determine whether the identified tissue structures contained neurons.

3. Results

In the lesser pelvis, we observed a relationship between the dimensions and the number of ganglia, as well as the number and course of nerve branches and anastomoses. We observed anatomical variations of the pelvic ANS in all 20 cases. In all cases, there was significant lateral asymmetry (Table 1). According to the number of ganglia, we classified the variations as segmental type (3 or more) and concentrated type (1 or 2). The segmental type was found in 14 (70%) cases, and the concentrated type was found in 6 (30%) cases (Table 2). The segmental type was observed in 12 men and 2 women; the concentrated type was found in 5 men and 1 woman. With the segmental and concentrated form of ANS, symptoms of the so-called diffuse form occurred in all cases. With the diffuse type, we observed transitions between both types of ANS formation. In similar cases, it is not possible to determine from which source the nerve branches arise, as they contain fibers of both systems (sympathetic and parasympathetic) in their composition.
Histologic analysis confirmed neural tissue in all samples of the peripheral ganglia. Sympathetic and parasympathetic neurons were identified based on the qualitative characteristics of cytoplasmic lipofuscin—neurons of the sympathetic system with eccentrically deposited nuclei and significant content of cytoplasmatic lipofuscin surrounded circumferentially by irregularly arranged satellite cells between the elongated nuclei of the Schwann cells. Neurons of the parasympathetic nerve were formed by large, lipofuscin pigment-depleted pseudounipolar cells.
In 14 cases in the segmental arrangement of the truncus sympathicus ganglia, more than two ganglia of rami communicantes provided anastomoses to the spinal nerves and participated in the formation of the pelvic plexus (Figure 1). In the sacral section, rami communicantes and rami interganglionares were observed more often with small ganglia (Figure 2). In 6 cases in the concentrated type, we observed a decrease in the number of ganglia tr. sympathicus (Figure 3), as well as the absence of small ganglia on the connecting branches. With the concentrated type, we observed not only a small number of junctions, but also a division of the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems.
In men with the segmental type of lesser pelvic organ innervation (Figure 1), the plexuses of the rectum and bladder contained several small ganglia, the connections with tr. sympathicus were numerous, the nn. erigentes pelvici formed connections with the plexus sacralis (4), which were numerous, and the plexus hypogastricus inferior (5) consisted of many branches arising from the plexus hypogastricus superior (6).
In the concentrated type of lesser pelvic organ innervation (Figure 3), the plexuses of the rectum (1) and bladder (2) consisted of a small number large nerve ganglia and the junction with the tr. sympathicus (3) was more weakly expressed than in the previous case (Figure 1). Nn. erigentes pelvici were rare. The plexus hypogastricus inferior was formed by a small number of branches, and the connections between them were less numerous. The other images show the uterovaginal plexus segmental type (Figure 4) and the concentrated type (Figure 5); the plexus spermaticus segmental type (Figure 6), and the concentrated type (Figure 7).
The other images show the significant asymmetry of the pelvic plexus in men (Figure 8) and asymmetric formation of the uterovaginal plexus in women (Figure 9).
In general, the form and alignment of the pelvic autonomic nerves displayed large individual variations, which could have a clinical implication on the postoperative function of the pelvic organs. From the observation of the extreme forms of formation of the pelvic ANS, it follows that in one section of the partition, as well as in others, ganglia can be scattered or concentrated.

4. Discussion

This study is the first description of morphological peculiarities with relation to the pelvic ANS in fresh cadavers. In this work, we provide a bilateral systemic view of the sources and distribution of nerve roots, plexuses, and ganglia, depending on their type. It describes in detail the topography of the inferior hypogastric plexus (IHP), which may be useful in improving nerve-sparing surgical approaches during pelvic surgery. The autonomic nerves of the lesser pelvis are particularly prone to iatrogenic lesions due to their exposed position during manifold surgical interventions. Nevertheless, the cause of rectal and urinary incontinence or sexual dysfunctions remains largely understudied [3,5,18,20,24,25].
We demonstrated a more specific distribution in the participation of different ganglia and ventral rami. Sacral sympathetic ganglion S2 and S4 were the primary sources of parasympathetic fibers to the IHP. Variations in results may be due in large measure to the fact that the autonomic nerve fibers are extremely tiny and difficult to dissect. There are similar sources for the pudendal nerve and the parasympathetic fibers forming the pelvic splanchnic nerves, suggesting that the somatic autonomic nervous system may be interrelated. The anatomical variations of root presentation, as well as possible variations, play an important role in the explanation of clinical symptoms. Significant variations in the formation of pelvic splanchnic nerves and the communication between them were observed. This brings us closer to the correct understanding of non-uniformity and idiosyncrasies in the development and course of pathological processes, differences in the clinical picture of the same diseases in different people, and non-uniform success in operations. The preoperative diagnosis of these variations is difficult. Anatomic variability and the inability to visualize the smaller diameter nerve fibers likely underlines the reasons why some postoperative visceral and sexual dysfunction occurs in spite of careful dissection and adequate surgical techniques. These findings highlight the importance of a discussion with patients about the risks that are associated with interrupting autonomic fibers during the surgical procedure [5,9,12,18,19,20,22,23,26,27].
The differences in and distribution of the ganglia are also reflected in the peculiarities of the connections between the parts of the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems. It is difficult to imagine that the differences in the structure of the pelvic plexus would not be reflected in the nature of the clinical problems. Paths of pain radiation and their localization are different, and it is difficult to determine their specificity for a particular organ. This diversity, from the point of view of radiation, can be explained by differences in the structure of the pelvic plexus. Irritation of the pelvic plexus caused by a painful condition of any organ can spread to different areas of the body, which often do not have a segmental connection with the given organ. The instability of the junctions may explain the instability of these symptoms. The instability of pain and the complexity of the body’s overall pain reactions depend on the individual characteristics of the patient, the nature of the reactions of the nervous system, and in each individual case, on the existing peculiarities of the structures of the ANS as a whole. It is clear that anatomical and physiological diversity and variation is a canon of living organisms. Variations in the nervous system are fewer than in any other organ system. This is undoubtedly due to the fact that the nervous system, more or less, controls the function of all the other organs. The variations in our set were frequent; their preoperative diagnosis is difficult to impossible. We analyzed the formation of the pelvic ANS in 20 fresh cadavers. We observed anatomical variations and significant lateral asymmetry of the pelvic ANS in all cases. In the literature, we did not observe a division according to the number of ganglia. Therefore, according to the number of ganglia, we classified the type of formation into segmental and concentrated types. The concentrated type occurred in 6 (30%) cases, and the segmental type of ANS formation occurred in 14 (70%) cases. In the concentrated type, we observed the division of the sympathetic and parasympathetic system. With the segmental and concentrated form, symptoms of the diffuse form may occur. We observed symptoms of the diffuse form in all cases. We also observed significant lateral asymmetry in the formation of the pelvis splanchnic nerves, as well as differences in the formation of the ganglia, and anastomosis. Anatomical variations of ANS have been described in previous studies. There are certain permissible anatomical variations described in the atlases, but the ones we observed here were more prominent and at the same time, asymmetrical. We did not come across works dealing with pelvic ANS variations bilaterally, but rather, we found papers dealing only with the variations of individual ANS nerves [11,13,15,16,23,28,29,30,31,32,33].
In our group, we observed these variations in all cases of the lumbosacral region. Knowledge of the possible variations in the formation of the pelvic plexus and the ANS of the lesser pelvis is useful in solving abdominal pathologies. Nn. splanchnici connect the pelvic plexus with the truncus sympathicus in the lumbosacral region, and through it, and rami communicantes are connected with corresponding segments of the spinal cord; differences in the level of formation of these nerves can clarify the peculiarities of pathological manifestations in diseases of the internal pelvic organs.

5. Conclusions

The description of pelvic ANS and its variants described in this cadaver study may be useful when carrying out pelvic surgery in this anatomical region. Awareness of the structure of the IHP might significantly improve outcomes in all fields of pelvic surgery. The absence or lack of perioperative vigilance can lead to damage to the pelvic ANS. We believe that the data obtained from anatomical dissections can be helpful for many surgeons, as well as for nursing practice and rehabilitation. It is necessary to realize that insufficient knowledge, as well as a misunderstanding of the basic pathophysiological mechanisms, can lead to erroneous considerations and the implementation of incorrect medical and nursing procedures which can endanger the health and life of the patient. Patient care in surgery is very demanding and requires both the physician and the nurse to possess adequate knowledge, to use critical thinking, and to engage in close cooperation with all members participating in the provision of health care.
Several factors influenced our study, especially the relatively small number of observations and the significant difference in the number of men and women in the study population. These are the limits affecting our interpretation and the possibility of generalizing our findings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.K. and V.M.; formal analysis, V.M. and R.K.; writing—original draft preparation, R.K., A.S., J.K., M.S., J.Š. and V.M.; writing—review and editing, R.K., A.S. and V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The figures used in the presented publication depict the anatomical situation obtained by careful and detailed dissection of cadavers within our forensic expertise and with the approval of the Ethics Committee Health Care Surveillance Authority, Žellova 2, 829 24 Bratislava, Slovakia. All studies related to peculiarities of the autonomic nervous system meet all applicable standards, rules, regulations, and laws imposed by the responsible officials.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all our colleagues who participated in this study. We express our gratitude to Anna Francová for her help with illustrating and preparing the text of this article. We would like to thank Rudolf Horváth and Stanislava Horváthová for their assistance and help with the dissections and documentation and Miroslav Rexa for help with proofreading, illustrating, and preparing the text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kachlík, D.; Varga, I.; Báča, V.; Musil, V. Variant anatomy and its terminology. Medicina 2020, 56, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Karemaker, J.M. An introduction into autonomic nervous function. Physiol. Meas. 2017, 38, R89–R118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yoham, A.L.; Bordoni, B. Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis, Inferior Hypogastric Plexus; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. Andtbacka, R.H.; Evans, D.B.; Pisters, P.W. Surgical and endoscopic palliation for pancreatic cancer. Minerva Chir. 2004, 59, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Baader, B.; Herrmann, M. Topography of the pelvic autonomic nervous system and its potential impact on surgical intervention in the pelvis. Clin. Anat. 2003, 16, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Beveridge, T.S.; Johnson, M.; Power, A.; Power, N.E.; Allman, B.L. Anatomy of the nerves and ganglia of the aortic plexus in males. J. Anat. 2015, 226, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Costello, A.J.; Brooks, M.; Cole, O.J. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int. 2004, 94, 1071–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Edwards, L.F.; Baker, R.C. Variations in the formation of the splanchnic nerves in man. Anat. Rec. 1940, 77, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gandhi, K.R.; Verma, V.K.; Chavan, S.K.; Joshi, S.D.; Joshi, S.S. The morphology of lumbar sympathetic trunk in humans: A cadaveric study. Folia Morphol. 2013, 72, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Gray, H. The nervous system, the sympathetic nervous system. In Gray’s Anatomy, 15th ed.; Pick, T.P., Howder, R., Eds.; Barner’s Noble: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 779–791. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang, H.J.; Gil, Y.C.; Lee, W.J.; Kim, T.J.; Lee, H.Y. Anatomy of thoracic splanchnic nerves for surgical resection. Clin. Anat. 2008, 21, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, J.H.; Wang, Q.; Cai, Q.P.; Dang, R.S.; Jiang, E.P.; Huang, H.L.; Sun, Y.P. Quantitative anatomical study of male pelvic autonomic plexus and its clinical potential in rectal resection. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2010, 32, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jit, I.; Mukerjee, R.N. Observations on the anatomy of the human thoracic sympathetic chain and its branches: With an anatomical assessment of operations for hypertension. J. Anat. Soc. India 1960, 9, 55–82. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sasselli, V.; Pachnis, V.; Burns, A.J. The enteric nervous system. Dev. Biol. 2012, 366, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ward, E.M.; Rorie, D.K.; Nauss, L.A.; Bahn, R.C. The celiac ganglia in man: Normal anatomic variations. Anesth. Analg. 1979, 58, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, X.M.; Zhao, Q.H.; Zeng, N.L.; Cai, C.P.; Xie, X.G.; Li, C.J.; Liu, J.; Zhou, J.Y. The celiac ganglia: Anatomic study using MRI in cadavers. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006, 186, 1520–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sienkiewicz-Zawilińska, J.; Zawiliński, J.; Kaythampilla, L.N.; Jakiel, M.; Urbaniak, J.; Bereza, T.; Kowalski, W.; Loukas, M.; Walocha, J. Autonomic nervous system of the pelvis-general overview. Folia Med. Cracov. 2018, 58, 21–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ripperda, C.M.; Jackson, L.A.; Phelan, J.N.; Carrick, K.S.; Corton, M.M. Anatomic relationships of the pelvic autonomic nervous system in female cadavers: Clinical applications to pelvic surgery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 216, 388.e1–388.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gaessler, J.; Anderhuber, F.; Kuchling, S.; Pilsl, U. Topography of the pelvic autonomic nerves-an anatomical study to facilitate nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision. Acta Chir. Belg. 2022, 122, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rocher, G.; Azaïs, H.; Favier, A.; Uzan, C.; Castela, M.; Moawad, G.; Lavoué, V.; Morandi, X.; Nyangoh Timoh, K.; Canlorbe, G. Relationships between pelvic nerves and levator ani muscle for posterior sacrocolpopexy: An anatomic study. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2022, 44, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lindsey, I.; Guy, R.J.; Warren, B.F.; Mortensen, N.J. Anatomy of Denonvilliers’ fascia and pelvic nerves, impotence, and implications for the colorectal surgeon. Br. J. Surg. 2000, 87, 1288–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shafik, A.; El-Sherif, M.; Youssef, A.; Olfat, E.S. Surgical anatomy of the pudendal nerve and its clinical implications. Clin. Anat. 1995, 8, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Snell, R.S. Clinical Anatomy by Regions, 7th ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2004; pp. 1–991. [Google Scholar]
  24. Walsh, P.C.; Mostwin, J.L. Radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy with preservation of potency. Results using a new nerve-sparing technique. Br. J. Urol. 1984, 56, 694–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Aurore, V.; Röthlisberger, R.; Boemke, N.; Hlushchuk, R.; Bangerter, H.; Bergmann, M.; Imboden, S.; Mueller, M.D.; Eppler, E.; Djonov, V. Anatomy of the female pelvic nerves: A macroscopic study of the hypogastric plexus and their relations and variations. J. Anat. 2020, 237, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lemos, N.; Souza, C.; Marques, R.M.; Kamergorodsky, G.; Schor, E.; Girão, M.J. Laparoscopic anatomy of the autonomic nerves of the pelvis and the concept of nerve-sparing surgery by direct visualization of autonomic nerve bundles. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 104, e11–e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Shu, T.; Li, B.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, Y.N.; Liu, S.H. Anatomical elucidation and histological study of pelvic autonomic nerve-plane based female fresh cadaver. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2022, 57, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Šteňová, J.; Kubíková, E.; Šteňo, J. Topografické anatomické vzťahy chrbtice, miechy a miechových nervov, význam pre klinickú prax. Neurol. Pre Prax 2009, 10, 205–208. [Google Scholar]
  29. Schraffordt, S.E.; Tjandra, J.J.; Eizenberg, N.; Dwyer, P.L. Anatomy of the pudendal nerve and its terminal branches: A cadaver study. ANZ J. Surg. 2004, 74, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bergman, R.A.; Afifi, K.A.; Miyauchi, R. Illustrated Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variation. Opus III: Nervous System. 2015. Available online: https://www.anatomyatlases.org/AnatomicVariants/NervousSystem/Introduction.shtml (accessed on 23 December 2022).
  31. Tubbs, R.S.; Shoja, M.M.; Loukas, M. (Eds.) Bergman’s Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variation; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rouvière, H.; Delmas, A. Anatomie Humaine. Descriptive, Topographique et Fonctionnelle, 15th ed.; Masson: Paris, France, 2002; pp. 1–784. ISBN 9782294003929. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pernkopf, E. Atlas of Topographical and Applied Human Anatomy, Vol. 2: Thorax, Abdomen and Extremities, 2nd revised ed.; W.B. Saunders Company: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1989; pp. 1–308. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. In the segmental type of lesser pelvic organ innervation in men, the rectal (1) and vesical (2) plexuses contain many small ganglia. Multiple connections with the sympathetic trunk are present (3). Nn. erigentes (pelvici) form connections with branches of the sacral plexus (4), which are also numerous. The inferior hypogastric plexus (5) consists of multiple nerve branches arising from the superior hypogastric plexus (6).
Figure 1. In the segmental type of lesser pelvic organ innervation in men, the rectal (1) and vesical (2) plexuses contain many small ganglia. Multiple connections with the sympathetic trunk are present (3). Nn. erigentes (pelvici) form connections with branches of the sacral plexus (4), which are also numerous. The inferior hypogastric plexus (5) consists of multiple nerve branches arising from the superior hypogastric plexus (6).
Medicina 59 00072 g001
Figure 2. (Left): Between the penultimate and last ganglia of the lumbar part of the sympathetic trunk, multiple interganglionic connections are seen. The first (1) and the second (2) sympathetic trunk ganglion is connected by multiple rami communicantes with the L1 nerve, with additional small ganglia (3) near the intervertebral ganglia along the thin communicating branches. In the area of the intervertebral ganglia, the sympathetic branches are associated with the dorsal branch of the spinal nerve (r. dorsalis nervi spinalis) (5), as well as with its ventral branch (r. ventralis) (4). In some cases, an increase in the number of ganglia in the sympathetic trunk is combined with multiple interganglionic branches (rr. interganglionares), along which other small ganglia occur. (Right): In the following picture, multiple interganglial connections are visible between the last one (1) and last two (2) ganglia of the lumbar part of the sympathetic trunk. On one fascicle, there is a relatively large ganglion (3), which, like the last lumbar, is connected by rami communicantes with the spinal nerve L5.
Figure 2. (Left): Between the penultimate and last ganglia of the lumbar part of the sympathetic trunk, multiple interganglionic connections are seen. The first (1) and the second (2) sympathetic trunk ganglion is connected by multiple rami communicantes with the L1 nerve, with additional small ganglia (3) near the intervertebral ganglia along the thin communicating branches. In the area of the intervertebral ganglia, the sympathetic branches are associated with the dorsal branch of the spinal nerve (r. dorsalis nervi spinalis) (5), as well as with its ventral branch (r. ventralis) (4). In some cases, an increase in the number of ganglia in the sympathetic trunk is combined with multiple interganglionic branches (rr. interganglionares), along which other small ganglia occur. (Right): In the following picture, multiple interganglial connections are visible between the last one (1) and last two (2) ganglia of the lumbar part of the sympathetic trunk. On one fascicle, there is a relatively large ganglion (3), which, like the last lumbar, is connected by rami communicantes with the spinal nerve L5.
Medicina 59 00072 g002
Figure 3. In the concentric type of sympathetic trunk, the plexuses of the rectum (1) and the urinary bladder (2) consist of a small number of large nerve ganglia, and the connections with the sympathetic trunk (3) are more weakly expressed. Nn. erigentes pelvici (4) were rare. The plexus hypogastricus inferior (5) was formed by a small number of branches, and the connections between them were less numerous.
Figure 3. In the concentric type of sympathetic trunk, the plexuses of the rectum (1) and the urinary bladder (2) consist of a small number of large nerve ganglia, and the connections with the sympathetic trunk (3) are more weakly expressed. Nn. erigentes pelvici (4) were rare. The plexus hypogastricus inferior (5) was formed by a small number of branches, and the connections between them were less numerous.
Medicina 59 00072 g003
Figure 4. Innervation of lesser pelvis organs in women. In the segmental type, the uterovaginal plexus is formed from the small ganglia (2), from which arise separated branches to the outer surface of the vagina (1), to the urinary bladder (3), ureter (4), vagina (5), uterus (6), and rectum (7).
Figure 4. Innervation of lesser pelvis organs in women. In the segmental type, the uterovaginal plexus is formed from the small ganglia (2), from which arise separated branches to the outer surface of the vagina (1), to the urinary bladder (3), ureter (4), vagina (5), uterus (6), and rectum (7).
Medicina 59 00072 g004
Figure 5. In the concentric type, 1 to 2 large-sized ganglia (2) are observed, from which arise separated branches (almost unconnected nerves on the periphery) to the outer surface of the vagina (1), to the urinary bladder (3), ureter (4), vagina (5), uterus (6), and rectum (7).
Figure 5. In the concentric type, 1 to 2 large-sized ganglia (2) are observed, from which arise separated branches (almost unconnected nerves on the periphery) to the outer surface of the vagina (1), to the urinary bladder (3), ureter (4), vagina (5), uterus (6), and rectum (7).
Medicina 59 00072 g005
Figure 6. Differences in the structure of the spermatic plexus. In the segmental type, they consist of numerous small ganglia and nerves. They encircle the spermatic vasa in the form of networks, and the renal plexuses (1), aortic plexuses (2), mesenteric plexus (3), and other plexuses consist of many small nodules and nerves connected to each other; they surround the vasa spermatica and arise from the above-mentioned plexuses. In the course of the nerves (in their proximal part), it is possible to observe a large number of small ganglia (4). In the periphery of such a structure, one can observe many connections (5) with the deferential plexus (6).
Figure 6. Differences in the structure of the spermatic plexus. In the segmental type, they consist of numerous small ganglia and nerves. They encircle the spermatic vasa in the form of networks, and the renal plexuses (1), aortic plexuses (2), mesenteric plexus (3), and other plexuses consist of many small nodules and nerves connected to each other; they surround the vasa spermatica and arise from the above-mentioned plexuses. In the course of the nerves (in their proximal part), it is possible to observe a large number of small ganglia (4). In the periphery of such a structure, one can observe many connections (5) with the deferential plexus (6).
Medicina 59 00072 g006
Figure 7. In the concentric type, the ganglionic masses are concentrated in a smaller number of large nodes. Connections between the plexus nerves on the periphery are less common. When the ganglionic masses are concentrated in a smaller number of large nodes, forming the renal plexus (1), aortic plexus (2), and mesenteric plexus (3), the spermatic plexus consists of a smaller number of thin nerves arising mainly from the renal and aortic plexuses. Between the nerves at the periphery of the plexus, the connections are less common. In similar cases, the connections of the spermatic plexus with the deferential plexus (4) are also rare.
Figure 7. In the concentric type, the ganglionic masses are concentrated in a smaller number of large nodes. Connections between the plexus nerves on the periphery are less common. When the ganglionic masses are concentrated in a smaller number of large nodes, forming the renal plexus (1), aortic plexus (2), and mesenteric plexus (3), the spermatic plexus consists of a smaller number of thin nerves arising mainly from the renal and aortic plexuses. Between the nerves at the periphery of the plexus, the connections are less common. In similar cases, the connections of the spermatic plexus with the deferential plexus (4) are also rare.
Medicina 59 00072 g007
Figure 8. Pelvic plexus, front view, craniocaudal direction. Significant asymmetry of the pelvic plexus is observed. Peritoneum (1), rectum (2), bladder (3), truncus sympathicus (4), ganglia trunci sympathici (5), postganglionic sympathetic branches (6), pelvic splanchnic nerves (7), ganglia plexus pelvicus (8). Subperitoneal penetration of the branches of the plexus to the organs of the lesser pelvis (9).
Figure 8. Pelvic plexus, front view, craniocaudal direction. Significant asymmetry of the pelvic plexus is observed. Peritoneum (1), rectum (2), bladder (3), truncus sympathicus (4), ganglia trunci sympathici (5), postganglionic sympathetic branches (6), pelvic splanchnic nerves (7), ganglia plexus pelvicus (8). Subperitoneal penetration of the branches of the plexus to the organs of the lesser pelvis (9).
Medicina 59 00072 g008
Figure 9. Uterovaginal plexus, front view, craniocaudal direction. Asymmetric formation of the uterovaginal plexus (5), uterus (2), vagina (3), small ganglia on the anterior and lateral sides of the vagina (4), bladder (1).
Figure 9. Uterovaginal plexus, front view, craniocaudal direction. Asymmetric formation of the uterovaginal plexus (5), uterus (2), vagina (3), small ganglia on the anterior and lateral sides of the vagina (4), bladder (1).
Medicina 59 00072 g009
Table 1. Division of cases according to lateral asymmetry of the pelvic plexus.
Table 1. Division of cases according to lateral asymmetry of the pelvic plexus.
Men (17)Women (3)
RightLeftRightLeft
51212
Table 2. Division according to the type of formation of peripheral ANS.
Table 2. Division according to the type of formation of peripheral ANS.
MenWomenSegmental TypeConcentric TypeSymptoms of Diffuse Form
17314620
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuruc, R.; Szórádová, A.; Kristová, J.; Solárová, M.; Šidlo, J.; Matejčík, V. Morphological Peculiarities of the Pelvic Autonomic Nervous System and Their Impact on Clinical Interventions in the Lesser Pelvic Region. Medicina 2023, 59, 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010072

AMA Style

Kuruc R, Szórádová A, Kristová J, Solárová M, Šidlo J, Matejčík V. Morphological Peculiarities of the Pelvic Autonomic Nervous System and Their Impact on Clinical Interventions in the Lesser Pelvic Region. Medicina. 2023; 59(1):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kuruc, Roman, Andrea Szórádová, Jarmila Kristová, Martina Solárová, Jozef Šidlo, and Viktor Matejčík. 2023. "Morphological Peculiarities of the Pelvic Autonomic Nervous System and Their Impact on Clinical Interventions in the Lesser Pelvic Region" Medicina 59, no. 1: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010072

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop