Next Article in Journal
Polymorphisms of Antioxidant Enzymes SOD2 (rs4880) and GPX1 (rs1050450) Are Associated with Bladder Cancer Risk or Its Aggressiveness
Previous Article in Journal
The Association of Beta-Blocker Use and Bone Mineral Density Level in Hemodialysis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Headache Characteristics, Impact, and Managing Techniques among Pharmacy and Nursing Undergraduates—An Observational Study

by
Adel S. Bashatah
1,
Wajid Syed
2,*,
Mahmood Basil A. Al-Rawi
3 and
Mohamed N. Al Arifi
2
1
Department of Nursing Administration & Education, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(1), 130; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010130
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 9 January 2023

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Many different forms of headaches can change or impact daily activity and quality of life, which increases the financial burden on society over time. Undergraduates who get headaches may be absent from attending lectures, perform less well on their daily tasks and academic achievement, as well as struggle to build and maintain relationships with peers and mentors. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the headache-related characteristics and managing approaches among Saudi pharmacy and nursing students at a Saudi university, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A survey questionnaire was administered in this cross-sectional study to participants at a Saudi university, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Participants included males. The sample size was calculated with Raosoft® software. Data analysis was executed using IBM Statistic SPSS, and the level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 236 participants completed the questionnaires. The majority, i.e., 218 (92.4%) of them, were male; in addition, 124 (52.5%) were aged between 26 and 30, 124 (52.5%) were pharmacy students, 112 (47.5%) were nursing students, and 134 (56.8%) were smokers. When asked about ever having at least one episode of headache during the week, 66.1% (n = 156) agreed that they had one episode of headache, although 57 (24.2%) of the students had a headache for five days during a week. With regard to the impact of headaches on everyday activities, only 34.7% of the students said that headache disrupted their regular activities. Almost 41% of the students agreed that headache impacted their academic performance. Nearly 34% of students (n = 79) who had headaches considered napping, while 33% (n = 64) took painkillers and anti-inflammatory medicines, and 25% (n = 59) considered taking caffeine. In this study, the participants’ ages and headache severity were strongly associated (p = 0.0001). More pharmacy students (66.1%) reported having severe headaches than nursing students (14.3%) (p = 0.0001). Conclusions: The current findings revealed that most of the undergraduates suffered from headaches, and the intensity of the pain was moderate; furthermore, one in four undergraduates reported that headaches impacted their academic performance. Caffeine and simple analgesics and anti-inflammatories were used for headache relief.

1. Introduction

Headaches are a regular phenomenon in the daily life of most people, especially university students [1,2]. According to estimates, headaches are the second most frequent cause of disability-related concerns [1,2]. A headache may be accompanied by throbbing, ongoing, mild, or intense discomfort in the head or face [2]. However, there are effective headache therapies available, such as medications, stress reduction techniques, and biofeedback [3]. Primary and secondary headaches are the two categories that the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-III) uses to categorize headaches [4]. A primary headache has no known cause, while a secondary headache is brought on by another ailment that causes inflammation of pain-sensitive tissues. Different types of headaches could be brought on by a vascular illness, a brain tumor, a systemic infection, or a head injury [5,6].
Regardless of gender or demographics, headaches are extremely challenging and can be incredibly interfaced. Aside from its issues, headaches are becoming more common in both adults and university students [7,8,9]. It has been established that headache-related issues affect a patient’s daily activities, education, and relationships, especially among undergraduates [10,11], as well as their treatment costs and clinic visits. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2013 report, migraine was the sixth-highest cause of years lost to disability (YLD), whereas headache disorders were rated third [5,7].
In the United States of America, there are estimated to be 5 million individuals who get headaches [12]. About 30 to 40 million adult Americans suffer from migraine, the most well-known type of headache condition [10,11]. According to estimates, 15% of adults in the United Kingdom suffer from headaches, with women outnumbering males three to one [12]. According to a population-based national assessment of the burden of headaches in Ethiopia, the three most common types of headaches were described as migraine (17.7%), tension-type headache (TTH) (20.6%), migraine probably caused by taking too many medications, and headache yesterday (6.4%) [13]. On the other hand, it was revealed that headache incidence and prevalence were higher among undergraduates. For instance, a prior study by Birru et al. found that migraines and tension-type headaches were the two most common types of headaches, accounting for 81.1% [14]. In Saudi Arabia, Almesned et al. found a prevalence of 53.78% of headaches among medical students [15]. The prevalence was higher among pharmacy students, at 88.7% [16]. However, researchers at King Faisal University found a prevalence of 41.6% of headaches, and migraine prevalence was 58.4% [17]. According to a recent survey among female students, there was a prevalence of 68.4% of headaches [18].
In GBD 2016, migraine was the first most prevalent disabling disease among the 15–49 age group [19]. According to the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study, migraine was the second leading cause of disability and the leading cause among young women aged 50 years. Every year, GBD estimates are updated to track the burden of disease around the world, thereby anticipating future healthcare demands [20]. There has been extensive research conducted in the past decade on headaches among children, adolescents, students, and adults throughout the world to examine their prevalence, characteristics, and management strategies [12,13,19,20,21,22].
Healthcare education has evolved and developed, and there is a prospect of a better healthcare system. Pharmacy and nursing students are one of the most valuable healthcare professionals, responsible for safely and quickly diagnosing and managing headaches. These data can be used to assess whether or not students believe that parts of their education (e.g., the amount of coursework) cause their headaches, as well as how much they believe headaches negatively affect their academic performance (e.g., grades). Therefore, there is a need to investigate the characteristics and management of headache pain between pharmacy and nursing students in Saudi Arabia. The purpose of this study was to describe the approaches and management strategies for headaches between Saudi pharmacy and nursing students.

2. Methods

A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted in a Saudi university in Riyadh Saudi Arabia over 3 months in 2022 to assess the prevalence and characteristics of headaches among nursing and pharmacy undergraduates. Saudi nationals, students living in the university hotel, those pursuing the third and fourth year of their courses and willing to provide informed consent, students who suffered from headaches, and those willing to complete the questionnaires were included, while students from other courses and levels were excluded. We opted for a convincing sampling procedure to collect the data from the targeted population.

2.1. Sample Size Estimation

There were approximately 500 undergraduate students enrolled in PharmD and Nursing courses. Similar to many previous studies [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], we estimated the required sample size with a 95% CI and a 5% margin of error using an online calculator (http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html, last accessed on 6 January 2023). We assumed that the response distribution for each question would be 50% because we were uninformed of the probable outcomes for each question. Despite the fact that the sample size was supposed to be 218, we decided to poll at least 300 students to ensure more reliability.
The questionnaires for this study were adopted from previous studies [15,16,23]. The study questionnaires were divided into three sections. The Section 1 collected demographic information of the undergraduates, which include age, gender, course of study, smoking status, and the presence of any chronic disease. The second part of the study collected information about the frequency and characteristics of the headache and management approaches, with a total of 9 items. The last part of the study collected information on the impact headaches can have on daily activity and academic performance and the sensitivity of headaches, with a total of 6 items. All these questionnaires were assessed on a multiple-choice and binary scale. The pain intensity was calculated by assuming that 0 means no pain; 1–3 indicates mild pain; 4–7 indicates moderate pain; and 8–10 indicates severe pain on the rating scale of 0–10.
The designed questionnaire was translated into Arabic local language with the help of a senior professor who is a native of Saudi Arabia and an expert in translating the questionnaire, using forward and backward translation procedures. The final questionnaires were validated in two steps. First, the initial draft of the questionnaires was evaluated by a research expert in the related field, to check the accuracy of the content and flow of the questionnaire. Secondly, a pilot study was conducted among a randomly selected sample of (n = 30) undergraduates to give their opinions. Any amendments from the pilot study were then unified into the final questionnaire. The reliability test was performed by calculating Cronbach’s alpha using SPSS v.26, which was found to be 0.85. The data from the pilot study were not included in the final analysis. The final questionnaire was then distributed using an online survey portal.
The data collection was carried out by using a convenience sampling procedure from the targeted population; data collection initially began from the college of pharmacy, and later, the data were collected from the college of nursing. For data collection, a researcher was appointed, who made continuous follow-ups and forwarded reminders to complete the study. We designed an electronic survey link to collect the data, using google forms, and the designed link was distributed to the targeted population using a social media platform (WhatsApp). The data collection was carried out until the required sample size was obtained.

2.2. Data Analysis

Initially, the data were entered into MS Excel and then analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 26 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics, e.g., frequencies and percentages, were used to summarize the data. Mean and standard deviation were also calculated for some of the variables. The association between the dependent and independent variables was collected using a chi-square test, and a p-value of <0.005 was considered a statistically significant difference.

3. Results

A total of 236 participants completed the questionnaires. Of those, 218 (92.4%) were male, 124 (52.5%) were aged between 26 and 30, 124 (52.5%) were pharmacy students, and 112 (47.5 %) were nursing students. There were no instances of chronic disease among the majority of the undergraduates (91.7%), while 134 (56.8%) were smokers. The detailed data on the demographic characteristics of the respondents are shown in Table 1.
When asked about ever having at least one episode of headache during the week, 66.1% (n = 156) agreed that they had one episode of headache, although 57 (24.2%) of the students had a headache for 5 days during a week. Concerning the previous question, regarding the number of episodes of headaches, 42.8% of the students had a headache for four days. More than one-third of the students reported speech disturbances, while 30.5% of them had a visual aura, with wavy lines or blind spots as reversible aura symptoms for headaches. Almost half (50.4%) of the undergraduates reported having headaches that were usually unilateral, while two-thirds of them had throbbing/pulsating type of headaches. Detailed information about the characteristics of the headache is given in Table 2.
With regard to the type of headache, findings revealed that frontal headaches were the most common, with 57 participants (24.2%), followed by generalized headaches at 23.3% (n = 55), temporal at 18.2% (n = 43), and occipital at 14.4% (n = 34) (Figure 1).
With regard to effects on everyday activities, only 34.7% of the students said that headache disrupted their regular activities, while 60.6% reported that headaches did not keep them from pursuing their routine activities. In addition, 32.6% said that headaches were usually associated with photophobia, although the majority, i.e., 76.7% (n = 181) of the students, also asserted that headaches were not usually associated with phonophobia. Only 25.8% of the students had a family history of headaches. Almost 40.7% of the students said that headaches impacted their academic performance (Table 3).
Although many students (76.3%) did not seek medical attention for headache management, 23.7% of them did. Nearly 34% of the students (n = 79) who had headaches considered napping, while 33% (n = 64) took painkillers and anti-inflammatory medicines, and 25% (n = 59) considered taking caffeine. In addition, the majority 65.3% (n = 154) of the students agreed that headaches stopped when they took medicine. Table 4 describes the frequency of headaches in respondents and their different management approaches for headaches.
In this study, the participants’ ages and headache severity were strongly associated. For example, 66.9% of participants between the ages of 26 and 30 reported having a severe headache, compared with other age groups (p = 0.0001). Similar to this, more pharmacy students (66.1%) than nursing students (14.3%) reported having severe headaches, indicating a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.0001). Additionally, there was an association between the student’s smoking status, type of headache, and intensity (p = 0.0001). Additionally, Table 5 provides a thorough explanation of the relationship between participant demographics and headache intensity. As demonstrated in Table 6, there was also a substantial association between daily activity and headache intensity, although there was no association between headache intensity and academic activity.

4. Discussion

This study was used to evaluate characteristics and managing approaches towards headaches between undergraduate nursing and pharmacy students at King Saud University. Moreover, pharmacy and nursing students themselves are likely to encounter many episodes of headaches and may look for strategies to overcome headaches during their studies. There is a high prevalence of headaches in the general population and among university students based on our literature review and collected data. Numerous population-based studies have been conducted on headaches in the general population; nevertheless, little is known about their prevalence and characteristics among specific populations, particularly pharmacy and nursing students in university, as headache is widely common among undergraduate students. However, this study revealed that proper management approaches for headaches may help in preventing adverse events. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the possible management approaches for headaches among undergraduate healthcare students.
Based on the frequency of headaches, our study revealed that 66.1% reported headaches weekly, 24.2% complained of headaches five days a week, and 42.8% had four episodes of headaches in a day. A study on undergraduate students of health professions showed that 43.5% of respondents complained of headaches monthly, 37.5% had this complaint on weekly basis, and 19% experienced it daily [33]. Recently, a study in Bangladesh conducted on university students reported that more than two-thirds of the students had more than five attacks during the past month [8]. Similarly, another study among medical undergraduates at Oman University observed that 96% of the students presented at least one episode of headache during the year preceding the data collection [34]. From our study, it was found that only 34.7% of the students complained that headaches disturbed their regular activities. These results were in line with a previous study by Rafi et al. among university students, which reported that 37% of headaches caused a severe impact on their daily activity [8]. Recent evidence indicates that the progression of headaches has worsened among undergraduate students, particularly healthcare students, due to the heavy burden of assignments, laboratory activities lengthy curriculum, grading system, and increased competitive level among students, which may contribute to stress and anxiety, which consequently trigger headaches.
Only 23.7% of study participants reportedly sought medical advice. These results were in line with other previous studies published around the world [14,33,34,35]. For instance, Alkarrash et al. found that, among undergraduate students at the University of Aleppo, 15.9% sought medical attention [35]. Similarly, Panigrahi et al. reported that 10% of undergraduate students seek medical treatment for headache relief [33]. However, the percentage of students in our study who sought medical assistance for their headaches was lower than that of earlier research by Amayo et al. in a sample of medical students (50%) [36] and a sample of university students by Deleu et al. (23.3%) [34]. The variation in the medical attention in the current study compared with earlier studies might be due to discrepancies in the methodology, the definition of headache, pain intensity, study population, or real differences.
In terms of medicine use, most of the students used simple analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs, followed by caffeine and sleeping methods to manage headaches, similar to previous findings [14,35], according to which the majority of the students used over-the-counter painkillers [14,33,35]. For example, Panigrahi et al. reported that paracetamol, aspirin, aceclofenac, and ibuprofen were the most commonly used self-medications for headaches. Additionally, students reported the use of various non-drug headache-relieving strategies such as sleeping and massaging heads [33]. These results were similar to our results. Our research revealed that headaches were typically unilateral (50.4%), bilateral (49.6%), throbbing or pulsating (61.9%), and pressing or tightening (22%) in nature, whereas a similar study reported unilateral (35.1%), bilateral (30.2%), and throbbing or pulsing (58.9%) types [33]. Additionally, according to a different study conducted among medical students, 80.9% of students had pain with a bilateral localization [37].
According to earlier studies, family history was the main reason for the incidence of headaches among participants. For instance, a previous study at Taif University, Saudi Arabia, reported that 86.6% of female students had a family history of headaches [18], while another study among medical students, by Anaya et al., revealed that 49.1% of the students had a positive family history [38]. However, our study reported that only 25.8% of the students had a family history of headaches, although it is documented that there is a 40% chance that a person would suffer from headaches if one of their parents has headache episodes. If both parents have headaches, their children have a high chance of developing them as well. In addition, there is an increased familial risk for headaches, indicating that headaches are most likely genetic. The good news is that therapies are continuously improving.
Among the general public and professionals, there is a lack of awareness about the epidemiology of headaches as well as the impact of headaches on individuals, their families, and society. Educational campaigns will create awareness about headaches, and such programs should be correctly managed in the healthcare arena. These programs will empower pharmacy and nursing students to improve headache diagnosis and management and to raise the priority of effective treatment and prevention of headaches at early stages. There is no doubt that this is a serious issue for both students and society, and additional studies are necessary to answer the risk factors of headaches.
In this study, participants’ age, gender, course of study, smoking habit, and type of headache were significantly associated with the intensity of headache, and similarly, headache intensity was associated with routine physical activity (p = 0.0001). Surprisingly, headache intensity was not significantly associated with academic performance (p > 0.005). In comparison, Panigrahi et al. found that gender, sleep disorder, consumption of soft drinks, and self-dissatisfaction with own health found to be the independent predictors of headaches. As is well known, undergraduates face difficulties in adapting to the new educational and social environment, which may lead to a stressful situation. In the case of healthcare students, this might be due to the high tension and stress subjected to them and even lack of adequate free time between courses/examinations in comparison to other non-health students.
Our study has some potential limitations. First of all, the data included herein were limited to only healthcare undergraduates (pharmacy and nursing); second, the study was conducted at a single university in Saudi Arabia, so the results may not fully reflect the headaches experienced by all healthcare undergraduates across Saudi Arabia or the general population. Third, since both male and female colleges in Saudi Arabia have separate campuses, and women are still not permitted to pursue their studies alongside men, limited responses were obtained from the female student body. Fourthly, the high number of smokers in this study may be explained by the fact that smoking is so common in modern society, especially among teenagers and college students, and that there are so many nicotine products easily available. Another potential weakness of this study is that it did not evaluate the various headache subtypes or the differences among them. Last but not least, to compare attitudes and outcomes, which can differ, this study did not include participants from a typical population of similar ages. Future studies should evaluate the generalizability of our findings by performing a more detailed assessment of different types of headaches among healthcare undergraduates. The results of this type of assessment may enable policymakers to conduct a timely assessment of societal problems and make recommendations accordingly.

5. Conclusions

According to the current findings, the majority of undergraduates suffered from headaches, the degree of pain was moderate, and one in every four undergraduates indicated that headaches interfered with their academic performance. Caffeine, analgesics, and anti-inflammatories were utilized to treat it. Furthermore, headache prevalence is increasing both nationally and internationally, particularly among university students, potentially leading to an increase in unfavorable effects on daily activities, including academic performance. It is critical to identify the causes generating headaches to control their occurrence. As a result, policymakers, academic officials, health professionals, and all other concerned parties should devote adequate attention to developing primary headache prevention and treatment techniques. As a result, we suggest the implementation of educational programs that teach students how to prevent and cure headache issues. This could help future graduates to overcome obstacles and live healthier lives.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.B. and W.S.; methodology, A.S.B.; software, M.N.A.A.; validation, M.B.A.A.-R., A.S.B. and W.S.; formal analysis, W.S.; investigation, M.B.A.A.-R.; resources, M.N.A.A.; data curation, A.S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.B.; writing—review and editing, W.S.; visualization, M.B.A.A.-R.; supervision, M.N.A.A.; project administration, M.N.A.A.; funding acquisition, A.S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Research Supporting Project, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, (RSP-2023/378).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study exempted from ethical approval.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the Participant(s).

Data Availability Statement

The data will be made available from the correspondence author, upon the request.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this study extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this study (RSP-2023/378) and for funding this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. Saylor, D.; Steiner, T.J. The global burden of headaches. Semin. Neurol. 2018, 38, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. James, S.L.; Abate, D.; Abate, K.H.; Abay, S.M.; Abbafati, C.; Abbasi, N.; Abdollahpour, I. Global, Regional, and National Incidence, Prevalence, and Years Lived with Disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 Countries and Territories, 1990–2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392, 1789–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Myoclinic. Headaches: Treatment Depends on Your Diagnosis and Symptoms. Available online: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/chronic-daily-headaches/in-depth/headaches/art-20047375 (accessed on 16 October 2022).
  4. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013, 33, 629–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. World Health Organization. Headache Disorders. Key Facts. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/headache-disorders (accessed on 16 October 2022).
  6. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Headache. Available online: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/headache (accessed on 16 October 2022).
  7. Philipp, J.; Zeiler, M.; Wöber, C.; Wagner, G.; Karwautz, A.F.K.; Steiner, T.J.; Wöber-Bingöl, Ç. Prevalence and burden of headache in children and adolescents in Austria-a nationwide study in a representative sample of pupils aged 10–18 years. J. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Rafi, A.; Islam, S.; Hasan, M.T.; Hossain, G. Prevalence and impact of migraine among university students in Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional survey. BMC Neurol. 2022, 22, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lucado, J.; Paez, K.; Elixhauser, A. Headaches in U.S. Hospitals and Emergency Departments, 2008. HCUP Statistical Brief #111; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lipton, R.B.; Silberstein, S.D. Episodic and chronic migraine headache: Breaking down barriers to optimal treatment and prevention. Headache 2015, 55 (Suppl. S2), 103–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Samreen, S.; Siddiqui, N.A.; Mothana, R.A. Prevalence of Anxiety and Associated Factors among Pharmacy Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 2436538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Steiner, T.J.; MacGregor, E.A.; Davies, P.T. Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication overuse headache. Br. Assoc. Study Headache 2007, 2007, 1–52. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zebenigus, M.; Tekle-Haimanot, R.; Worku, D.K.; Thomas, H.; Steiner, T.J. The burden of headache disorders in Ethiopia: National estimates from a population-based door-to-door survey. J. Headache Pain 2017, 18, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Birru, E.M.; Abay, Z.; Abdelwuhab, M.; Basazn, A.; Sirak, B.; Teni, F.S. Management of headache and associated factors among undergraduate medicine and health science students of University of Gondar, North West Ethiopia. J. Headache Pain 2016, 17, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Almesned, I.S.; Alqahtani, N.G.; Alarifi, J.A.; Alsaawy, T.N.; Agha, S.; Alhumaid, M.A. Prevalence of primary headache among medical students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2018, 7, 1193–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Abd El-Mawgod, M.M.; Hashem, H.A.; Elboraei, Y.A. Primary Headache among University Students: Across Sectional Study. Pak. J. Med. Health Sci. 2022, 16, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Al-Hassanl, E.S.; Al-Mulifi, A.A.; Al-Khudhayr, A.M.; Al-Quraini, A.W.; Al-Omran, A.M.; Al-Musallam, E.J.; Al-Rashed, B.A.; Al-Mubarak, D.A.; Al-Yousof, H.M.; Al-Khalifa, K.R.; et al. Prevalence of headache in female students in King Faisal University: A questionnaire study. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2013, 5, 256–260. [Google Scholar]
  18. Desouky, D.E.; Zaid, H.A.; Taha, A.A. Migraine, tension-type headache, and depression among Saudi female students in Taif University. J. Egypt. Public Health Assoc. 2019, 94, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Vos, T.; Abajobir, A.A.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Abate, K.H.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdulkader, R.S.; Abdulle, A.M.; Abebo, T.A.; Abera, S.F.; et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet 2017, 390, 1211–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Steiner, T.J.; Stovner, L.J.; Jensen, R.; Uluduz, D.; Katsarava, Z.; on behalf of Lifting The Burden: The Global Campaign against Headache. Migraine remains second among the world’s causes of disability, and first among young women: Findings from GBD2019. J. Headache Pain 2020, 21, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Iliopoulos, P.; Damigos, D.; Kerezoudi, E.; Limpitaki, G.; Xifaras, M.; Skiada, D.; Tsagkovits, A.; Skapinakis, P. Trigger factors in primary headaches subtypes: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary centre in Greece. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Steiner, T.J.; Scher, A.I.; Stewart, W.F.; Kolodner, K.; Liberman, J.; Lipton, R.B. The prevalence and disability burden of adult migraine in England and their relationships to age, gender and ethnicity. Cephalalgia 2003, 23, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alhazmi, R.A.; Alobaid, A.M.; Althunayyan, S.M.; Syed, W.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A. A cross-sectional assessment of knowledge, awareness of risk factors, and perceptions of thyroid disease (TD) among adults living in Saudi Arabia-A community based study. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1041745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Syed, W.; Samarkandi, O.A.; Alsadoun, A.; Harbi, M.K.A.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A. Evaluation of clinical knowledge and perceptions about the development of thyroid cancer-An observational study of healthcare undergraduates in Saudi Arabia. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 912424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Syed, W.; Samarkandi, O.A.; Sadoun, A.A.; Bashatah, A.S.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A.; Alharbi, M.K. Prevalence, Beliefs, and the Practice of the Use of Herbal and Dietary Supplements Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: An Observational Study. Inquiry 2022, 59, 469580221102202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Syed, W.; Alharbi, M.K.; Samarkandi, O.A.; Alsadoun, A.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A.; Iqbal, A.; Samreen, S. Evaluation of Knowledge, Awareness, and Factors Associated with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Community-Based Study. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2022, 2022, 1921010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Syed, W.; Alsadoun, A.; Bashatah, A.S.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A.; Siddiqui, N. Assessment of the knowledge beliefs and associated factors among Saudi adults towards blood donation in Saudi Arabia. Hematology 2022, 27, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wajid, S.; Samreen, S.; Sales, I.; Bawazeer, G.; Mahmoud, M.A.; Aljohani, M.A. What Has Changed in the Behaviors of the Public After the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional Study From the Saudi Community Perspective. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 723229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Syed, W.; Iqbal, A.; Siddiqui, N.A.; Mothana, R.A.; Noman, O. Attitudes and Associated Demographic Factors Contributing towards the Abuse of Illicit Drugs: A Cross-Sectional Study from Health Care Students in Saudi Arabia. Medicina 2022, 58, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Syed Snr, W.; Bashatah, A.; AAl-Rawi, M.B. Evaluation of Knowledge of Food–Drug and Alcohol–Drug Interactions Among Undergraduate Students at King Saud University–An Observational Study. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2022, 1, 2623–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bashatah, A.; Wajid, S. Knowledge and Disposal Practice of Leftover and Expired Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study from Nursing and Pharmacy Students’ Perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Samreen, S.; Siddiqui, N.A.; Wajid, S.; Mothana, R.A.; Almarfadi, O.M. Prevalence and Use of Dietary Supplements among Pharmacy Students in Saudi Arabia. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 2020, 13, 1523–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Panigrahi, A.; Behera, B.K.; Sarma, N.N. Prevalence, pattern, and associated psychosocial factors of headache among undergraduate students of health profession. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2020, 8, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Deleu, D.; Khan, M.A.; Humaidan, H.; Al Mantheri, Z.; Al Hashami, S. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of headache in medical students in Oman. Headache J. Head Face Pain 2001, 41, 798–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alkarrash, M.S.; Shashaa, M.N.; Kitaz, M.N.; Rhayim, R.; Alhasan, M.M.; Alassadi, M.; Aldakhil, A.; Alkhamis, M.; Ajam, M.; Douba, M.; et al. Migraine and tension-type headache among undergraduate medical, dental and pharmaceutical students of University of Aleppo: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Neurol. Open 2021, 3, e000211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Amayo, E.O.; Jowi, J.O.; Njeru, E.K. Headache associated disability in medical students at the Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi. East Afr. Med. J. 2002, 79, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Antonenko, K.; Poliukhovych, O.; Antonenko, A.; Sokolova, L. Prevalence and severity of headache in medical students during quarantine due to COVID-19. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28 (Suppl. S1), 485. [Google Scholar]
  38. Anaya, F.; Alia, A.; Hamoudeh, F.; Nazzal, Z.; Maraqa, B. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of headache among medical students in Palestine: A cross sectional study. BMC Neurol. 2022, 22, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Site of headache.
Figure 1. Site of headache.
Medicina 59 00130 g001
Table 1. The demographic characteristics of the participants.
Table 1. The demographic characteristics of the participants.
VariablesFrequency
(n)
Percentage
(%)
Gender
  Male
  Female

218
18

92.4
7.6
Age (full years)
  18 to 25
  26 to 30

112
124

47.5
52.5
Classification
  Pharmacy
  Nursing

124
112

52.5
47.5
Smoking status
  Current smoker
  Non-smoker
  Ex-smoker

134
81
21

56.8
34.3
8.9
Presence of chronic disease
  Yes
  No

40
196

16.9
83.1
Table 2. Characters of the headaches among respondents.
Table 2. Characters of the headaches among respondents.
Characteristic Frequency
(n)
Percentage
(%)
Have you ever had at least one episode of headache during the past week?
  Yes
  No

156
80

66.1
33.9
Do you have any of these fully reversible aura symptoms that are
accompanied or followed by your headache episodes?
  Visual aura or wavy lines
  (Sensation disturbances) pins, needles, numbness
  (Speech disturbances), e.g., aphasia
  Motor weakness
  I have none of the above aura symptoms


72
10
87
51
16


30.5
4.2
36.9
21.6
6.8
Approximately, how many days have you had a headache during the past
week?
  None
  One day
  Two days
  Three days
  Four days
  Five days
  Six days
  Seven days


2
47
45
42
31
57
8
4


0.8
19.9
19.1
17.8
13.1
24.2
3.4
1.7
To the previous question, how many EPISODES per day do you have a
headache (Write a number)
  None
  One day
  Two days
  Three days
  Four days
  Five days
  Six days
  Seven days


2
50
31
34
101
14
1
1


0.8
21.2
13.1
14.4
42.8
5.9
0.4
0.4
Your headache is usually
  Bilateral
  Unilateral

117
119

49.6
50.4
The headache quality is usually
  Throbbing/Pulsating
  Pressing/Tightening
  Sharp/Stabbing

146
52
38

61.9
22.0
16.1
The average intensity of headache pain?
  Mean (SD)
  Mild pain
  Moderate pain
  Severe pain

6.72 ± 2.63
25
113
98

(M = 7)
10.6
47.9
41.5
Table 3. Headache impact, cause, and sensitivity among respondents.
Table 3. Headache impact, cause, and sensitivity among respondents.
VariablesFrequency
(n)
Percentage
(%)
Does your headache aggregate with routine activities?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure

82
125
29

34.7
53
12.3
Does your headache cause you to avoid routine activities?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure

77
143
16

32.6
60.6
6.8
Headaches associated with photophobia (sensitivity to light)?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure

77
151
8

32.6
64
3.4
Headaches associated with phonophobia (fear of loud sounds)?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure

48
181
7

20.3
76.7
3
Do you have a family history of headaches?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure

61
166
9

25.8
70.3
3.8
Did your headache impact your academic activity?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure

96
125
15

40.7
53
6.5
Table 4. Detailed information on the management of headaches among respondents.
Table 4. Detailed information on the management of headaches among respondents.
VariablesFrequency
(n)
Percentage
(%)
Have you ever sought medical attention for your headache?
  Yes
  No

56
180

23.7
76.3
Which treatments/medications do you take for headaches?
  Analgesics and anti-inflammatories, e.g., Panadol and aspirin
  Sedatives
  Herbs and alternative and traditional medications
  Caffeine
  Message
  Sleeping
  I do not take any medications for my headaches

64
8
11
59
3
79
12

27.1
3.4
4.7
25.0
1.3
33.5
5.1
Does your headache stop when you take medication?
  Yes
  No
  I do not take any medications

154
48
34

65.3
20.3
14.4
Table 5. Cross-tabulation of undergraduate’s characters concerning intensity levels of headache.
Table 5. Cross-tabulation of undergraduate’s characters concerning intensity levels of headache.
VariablesIntensity of Headachep-Value
Mild pain
25 (10.6%)
Moderate
113 (47.9%)
Severe Pain
98 (41.5%)
Gender
  Male
  Female

22 (10.1)
03 (16.7)

105 (48.2)
08 (44.4)

91 (41.7)
07 (38.9)
0.687
Age (full years)
  18 to 25
  26 to 30

22 (19.6)
03 (2.4)

75 (67)
38 (30.6)

15 (13.4)
83 (66.9)
0.0001
Classification
  Pharmacy
  Nursing

03 (2.4)
22 (19.6)

39 (31.5)
74 (66.1)

82 (66.1)
16 (14.3)
0.0001
Smoking status
  Current smoker
  Non-smoker
  Ex-smoker

08 (6.0)
15 (18.5)
02 (9.5)

47 (35.1)
53 (65.4)
13 (61.9)

79 (59.0)
13 (16.0)
06 (28.6)
0.0001
Presence of chronic disease
  Yes
  No

07 (17.5)
18 (9.2)

19 (47.5)
94 (48.0)

14 (35.0)
84 (42.9).
0.260
Headache type
  Bilateral
  Unilateral

17 (14.5)
08 (6.7)

61 (52.1)
52 (43.7)

39 (33.3)
59 (49.6)
0.018
Family history of headache
  Yes
  No

06 (9.4)
19 (11.0)

33 (51.6)
80 (46.5)

25 (39.1)
73 (42.4)
0.794
Table 6. Levels of intensity of headache concerning some activities.
Table 6. Levels of intensity of headache concerning some activities.
VariablesHeadache Intensityp-Value
Mild PainModerateSevere Pain
Do your headaches intensify with daily
activity?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure


06 (7.3)
19 (15.2)
0 (0)


49 (59.8)
52 (41.6)
12 (41.4)


27 (32.9)
54 (43.2)
17 (58.6)
0.008
Headache disturbs routine activity
  Yes
  No
  Not sure

07 (9.1)
17 (11.3)
01 (12.5)

50 (64.9)
61 (40.4)
02 (25)

20 (26.0)
73 (48.3)
5 (3.3)
0.007
Did the headache impact your academic
activity?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure


10 (10.4)
14 (11.2)
01 (6.7)


54 (56.3)
54 (43.2)
5 (33.3)


32 (33.3)
57 (45.6)
09 (60.0)
0.182
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bashatah, A.S.; Syed, W.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A.; Al Arifi, M.N. Assessment of Headache Characteristics, Impact, and Managing Techniques among Pharmacy and Nursing Undergraduates—An Observational Study. Medicina 2023, 59, 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010130

AMA Style

Bashatah AS, Syed W, Al-Rawi MBA, Al Arifi MN. Assessment of Headache Characteristics, Impact, and Managing Techniques among Pharmacy and Nursing Undergraduates—An Observational Study. Medicina. 2023; 59(1):130. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010130

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bashatah, Adel S., Wajid Syed, Mahmood Basil A. Al-Rawi, and Mohamed N. Al Arifi. 2023. "Assessment of Headache Characteristics, Impact, and Managing Techniques among Pharmacy and Nursing Undergraduates—An Observational Study" Medicina 59, no. 1: 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010130

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop