Next Article in Journal
The Very First Romanian Unruptured 13-Weeks Gestation Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Multiple Factors on the Incidence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Risk Assessment Tool
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rapid Administration of Antibiotics for Reducing Fever Days in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

1
Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi 60002, Taiwan
2
Min-Hwei Junior College of Health Care Management, Tainan 73658, Taiwan
3
Department of Nursing Care, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi 60002, Taiwan
4
Division of Infection, Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi 60002, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2022, 58(9), 1157; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091157
Submission received: 5 July 2022 / Revised: 10 August 2022 / Accepted: 23 August 2022 / Published: 25 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Hematology and Immunology)

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Neutropenic fever (NF) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To date, no study has discussed the relationship of fever days in HSCT with the time between recording the fever and administering antibiotics. This study aimed to examine the association between fever days in HSCT and the time interval between recording the fever and intravenous (IV) antibiotics to the febrile neutropenia patient. Materials and Methods: A total of 22 patients who developed NF after HSCT in one hospital were analyzed. Patients who received IV antibiotics injection within 30 min were categorized in group A and those who received the injection after 30 min were categorized in group B. Fever was defined by an attack with an oral temperature of 38.3 °C. Patients’ characteristics and possible risk factors were recorded and analyzed. Results: Groups A and B had 14 and 8 patients, respectively. Patient characteristics, including age, diagnosis, sex, and antibiotics level, were similar between the two groups. The median duration of fever days was 1.5 (range, 1–5) in group A and 6.5 (range, 1–14) in group B (p = 0.003). Multivariant analysis of possible independent impact factors of “fever days in HSCT” was performed. The odds ratio of “antibiotics given time” was 4.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.26 to 7.22, p = 0.001). The “antibiotics level” did not affect the NF period (odds ratio = −0.80, 95% CI = −2.40 to 1.07, p = 0.453). Conclusions: Rapid IV administration of antibiotics (<30 min after fever attack) can reduce the fever days in patients undergoing HSCT.

1. Introduction

High-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell rescue may effectively eliminate residual disease, reduce relapse risk, and prolong disease-free survival in hematological disorders, such as malignant lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma [1,2,3,4]. However, fever during neutropenia (neutropenic fever (NF)) is almost universally present in complications of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients [5]. Fever may be the only manifestation of infection, because NF patients are unable to initiate an appropriate immune response.
Although the application of new broad-spectrum antibiotics (BSA) and the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) have reduced the fever days of patients receiving HSCT, infection is a major complication of HSCT [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Several practice guidelines have suggested that isolation protection; central vein catheter care; prophylactic antibacterial, antifungal, and antiagents use; oral hygiene care; and G-CSF [13,14] are effective at reducing the incidence of NF [4,8,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Thus, effective prevention of specific infections has allowed for the use of increasingly effective conditional therapies, thereby prolonging survival in HSCT recipients [22].
When a fever episode occurs, the administration of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics as soon as possible is recommended [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. The Infectious Disease Society of America and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend time to antibiotic for NF patients of 60 to 120 min [23]. However, no study has discussed the relationship of fever days in HSCT with the time between recording the fever and administering antibiotics. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the association between fever days in HSCT and the time interval between recording the fever and intravenous (IV) antibiotics to the NF patient.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

Adult patients with hematological disorder who received HSCT were recruited for the study from one institute. This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chiayi Christian Hospital (approval no. CYCH-IRB-104019). All patients received HSCT in the same laminar airflow room, and their body temperatures were recorded every 4 h if their body temperature was <37 °C, and every 1 h if body temperature was >37 °C. Patient characteristics and possible risk factors influencing fever days in HSCT, including age, antibiotics level, and antibiotics given time, were recorded through chart review. The posttransplant follow-up was continued until 6 months after transplant.

2.2. Conditioning Treatments

The conditioning regimen used for malignant lymphoma in 15 patients was BEAC (i.e., bis-chloroethylnitrosourean (BCNU) 300 mg/m2/day on day 7, etoposide 100 mg/m2/day from day 6 to day 3, cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day from day 6 to day 3, and cyclophosphamide 35 mg/kg/day from day 6 to day 3) [1]. The conditioning regimen for three patients with acute myeloid leukemia and two patients with acute lymphoid leukemia patients was BuCy (busulfan (1 mg/kg body weight) orally every 6 h for 16 doses from day 7 to day 4, followed by cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/day IV) after 1 h on day 3 and day 2) [2]. The conditioning regimen for three patients with severe aplastic anemia and one patient with multiple myeloma was high-dose cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg/day IV) after 1 h from day 5 to day 2 [3].

2.3. Infection Prophylaxis

All patients were managed in a laminar airflow room under standardized care procedures. Prophylaxis with oral antibiotics (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin) and an antifungal agent (fluconazole) was provided from day 10 to patients transferred to the general ward. When the patient started switching to broad-spectrum antibiotics, prophylaxis oral antibiotics were discontinued at the same time, but antifungal agents continued. Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis was used in all of the patients [6,10,13]. All of the patients received G-CSF subcutaneous injection (300 mcq per day) from the day of transplantation until the patient’s absolute neutrophil counts were >3000/cumm.

2.4. Definition of Fever Days in HSCT

Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count of less than 500/µL. Fever was defined by an attack with an oral temperature of 38.3 °C. “Fever days in HSCT” was defined as the number of days on which the HSCT patient had one or more medical records of oral temperature >38.3 °C. Subsided fever was defined as a patient oral temperature of <38.3 °C for 24 h. Acute graft-versus-host disease was excluded based on clinical expressions.

2.5. Definition of “Antibiotics Given Time”

The time at which the oral temperature of the HSCT patient was >38.3 °C was defined as “time point A”. The time at which the patient was injected with IV antibiotics was defined as “time point B”. The “antibiotics given time” was defined as the time interval between “time point A” and “time point B”. In this study, patients in Group A received IV antibiotics within 30 min and those in Group B received IV antibiotics >30 min after fever was noted.

2.6. Definition of “Antibiotics Level”

Antibiotics that are highly potent against broad-strain aerobic Gram-negative bacilli, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, such as carbapenems and various antipseudomonal penicillins, and those with a potent activity against broad-strain aerobic Gram-positive bacilli, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), such as vancomycin as well as anti-fungal treatments, are defined as level II antibiotics. Other antibiotics that have minimal activity against P. aeruginosa or MRSA are defined as level I antibiotics.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The SPSS software (Version 12.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used for testing the dichotomous variables. The factors that were significant or that showed a trend toward significance based on univariate analysis were used for multiple regression analysis. The level of statistical significance was set at <0.05.

3. Results

In total, 24 adult patients with hematological disorder who received HSCT were enrolled. The vital sign check-up, infection prophylaxis, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and seizure prophylaxis were performed for all patients at the same time schedules. In this study, 22 adult patients had NF. Of the patients with NF, 14 received IV antibiotics within 30 min (group A) of fever occurrence and the remaining eight received IV antibiotics >30 min after fever occurrence (group B). In group B, five patients received IV antibiotics for 30–60 min (three received class I antibiotics and two received class II therapy); the other three patients received IV antibiotics >60 min (one received class I antibiotics treatment and two received level II treatment). Other hematological disorders included three with severe aplastic anemia, three with acute myeloid leukemia, two with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and one with multiple myeloma. Acute GVHD, including skin presentation (dermatitis and blisters), abdominal upset (severe diarrhea and nausea), and hepatitis without other etiologies were closely followed up clinically. The patient characteristics, including age, underlying diagnosis, sex, and antibiotics level, were similar between the two groups (Table 1).
The median duration of fever days was 1.5 (range, 1–5) in group A and 6.5 (range, 1–14) in group B (p = 0.003) (Figure 1). Multivariant analysis of possible independent impact factors for “fever days in HSCT” were examined in two risk variants, namely “antibiotics given time” and “antibiotics level”. The odds ratio (OR) for antibiotics given time (group B vs. group A) was 4.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.26 to 7.22, p = 0.001). The OR for antibiotics level (first-line antibiotics vs. second-line antibiotics) was −0.80 (95% CI = −2.40 to 1.07, p = 0.453) (Table 2).

4. Discussion

Bacterial infection is a major concern among patients receiving HSCT and may lead to high mortality (1.5–28%) during neutropenia status [9,11,12]. Risk factors associated with bacterial infection in these patients are HSCT type, granulocytopenia, mucositis, presence of central venous catheter, presence of graft-versus-host disease, and contamination of hematopoietic stem cell collection [9,18]. Infections remain the leading cause of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and healthcare costs [24]. Antibiotics prophylaxis is suggested routinely. However, even after nursing care and infection prophylaxis are integrated, the incidence of febrile neutropenia is high, and empirical antibiotics administration is crucial as fever episodes occur during HSCT [7,9,13,14]. In most guidelines regarding the management of febrile neutropenia, the focus is on the choice of antibiotics and not on how soon empirical antibiotics must be administered [6,7,8,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In our results, we did not observe a statistical difference between different types of antibiotics. This may be due to the small sample size of the study.
Patients undergoing HSCT typically develop a diverse range of symptoms during bone marrow recoveries, such as fever, which is thought to reflect a systemic inflammatory state corresponding to immune cell reconstitution, associated with cytokine release and capillary leakage. In adult patients who received HSCT, it was found that the length of hospital stay was directly related to the frequency of fever (p < 0.0001), and the incidence of fever in autologous stem cell transplantation was significantly higher than that in allogeneic transplantation (p < 0.05) [25]. Patients aged 60 years or older are known to be more likely to develop peri-engraftment fever than younger patients (1.833, 1.045–3.214, p = 0.034) [26].
Fever is the most important sign of infection during the early post-transplantation before engraftment. Fever days could be associated with the duration of neutropenia, timing of fever relative to engraftment/HSCT, the timing of graft engraftment after HSCT, and the source of graft (peripheral blood, bone marrow, or cord blood), especially in allogeneic HSCT. Allogeneic HSCT patients had a longer duration of neutropenia than autologous patients (15.6 vs. 9.2 days, p < 0.001) [27]. Additionally, some practice guidelines have indicated that IV antibiotics must be administered as soon as possible based on general practice experience and not according to scientific statistical analysis [6,7,8,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,28]. Furthermore, knowing how fast is acceptable and how slow is critical, and remains unclear. According to a study by Jeddi et al. [28], the first 6 h is the ideal time to administer IV BSA and any delay may increase mortality. In our retrospective analysis, we observed that administering antibiotics within 30 min can reduce febrile days compared with administering antibiotics >30 min after fever attack (1.5 vs. 6.5 days, p = 0.003).
Lin et al. [29] observed that patients with severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 100 cumm) treated in a nonintensive care unit with delayed active antimicrobial therapy showed a high mortality (OR = 18.0; 95% CI = 2.84 to 114.5; p < 0.01). However, patients with severe neutropenia but treated in an intensive care unit with delayed active antimicrobial therapy show a trend of increased mortality (OR = 5.56; 95% CI = 0.85 to 36.3; p = 0.07). In this study, one case of delayed active IV antimicrobial therapy involved initiation after 24 h of index blood withdrawal. However, in our study, we ensured adequate IV antibiotics administration within 30 min from fever occurrence. This treatment regimen reduced the fever days in intensive care unit statistically and may improve survival outcomes.
This study had some limitations. First of all, it is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis; its applicability to large programs across the country is not yet known. Second, the sample size in this study was relatively small, making it more difficult to distinguish the real effect and random variation. Lastly, in most hospital administration policies in Taiwan, IV antibiotics are stored in the central pharmacy, which may lead to time loss during the transit of medications to the HSCT room. These security barriers may delay the timely administration of IV antibiotics after fever occurrence.

5. Conclusions

Fever during neutropenia is almost universal after an HSCT. In this preliminary result, we found that HSCT patients needed to be given IV antibiotics <30 min after fever occurrence. This procedure can reduce the fever days in HSCT. A large sample size is needed to confirm its role in reduced mortality. For patient safety, HSCT management education should emphasize the importance of administering antibiotics to patients with neutropenic fever within 30 min of fever occurrence.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-Y.L. and Y.-J.C.; methodology, M.-Y.L.; formal analysis, M.-Y.L.; investigation, M.-Y.L.; data curation, M.-Y.L., Y.-J.C., Y.-C.L., C.-H.K., Y.-H.K., S.-C.T. and G.-J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-Y.L.; writing—review and editing, M.-Y.L.; supervision, M.-Y.L.; project administration, M.-Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received the grant support from the Blood Stem Cell Transplant Team and Cancer Registry, Cancer Center in Chia-Yi Christian Hospital.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chiayi Christian Hospital (protocol code CYCH-IRB-104019).

Informed Consent Statement

This retrospective observational study used de-identified and routine diagnosis/treatment data, thus CYCH-IRB-104019 approved a waiver of informed consent from all patients for being included in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Freedman, A.S.; Neuberg, D.; Mauch, P.; Soiffer, R.J.; Anderson, K.C.; Fisher, D.C.; Schlossman, R.; Alyea, E.P.; Takvorian, T.; Jallow, H.; et al. Long-term follow-up of autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. Blood 1999, 94, 3325–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Niewerth, D.; Creutzig, U.; Bierings, M.B.; Kaspers, G.J. A review on allogeneic stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2010, 116, 2205–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Danylesko, I.; Shimoni, A.; Nagler, A. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation and targeted immunotherapy for multiple myeloma. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013, 13 (Suppl. S2), S330–S348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Peinemann, F.; Bartel, C.; Grouven, U. First-line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of HLA-matched sibling donors compared with first-line ciclosporin and/or antithymocyte or antilymphocyte globulin for acquired severe aplastic anemia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, 7, CD006407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Signorelli, J.; Zimmer, A.; Liewer, S.; Shostrom, V.K.; Freifeld, A. Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) Recipients on levofloxacin prophylaxis. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Machado, C.M.; Dulley, F.L.; Boas, L.S.; Castelli, J.B.; Macedo, M.C.; Silva, R.L.; Pallota, R.; Saboya, R.S.; Pannuti, C.S. CMV pneumonia in allogeneic BMT recipients undergoing early treatment of pre-emptive ganciclovir therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000, 26, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Taplitz, R.A.; Jordan, M.C. Pneumonia caused by herpesviruses in recipients of hematopoietic cell transplants. Semin. Respir. Infect. 2002, 17, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yanada, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Emi, N.; Naoe, T.; Suzuki, R.; Taji, H.; Iida, H.; Shimokawa, T.; Kohno, A.; Mizuta, S.; et al. Cytomegalovirus antigenemia and outcome of patients treated with pre-emptive ganciclovir: Retrospective analysis of 241 consecutive patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003, 32, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Afessa, B.; Peters, S.G. Major complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 27, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gafter-Gvili, A.; Fraser, A.; Paul, M.; Vidal, L.; Lawrie, T.A.; van de Wetering, M.D.; Kremer, L.C.; Leibovici, L. Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 1, CD004386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sahin, U.; Toprak, S.K.; Atilla, P.A.; Atilla, E.; Demirer, T. An overview of infectious complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J. Infect. Chemother. 2016, 22, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Styczynski, J.; Tridello, G.; Koster, L.; Iacobelli, S.; van Biezen, A.; van der Werf, S.; Mikulska, M.; Gil, L.; Cordonnier, C.; Ljungman, P.; et al. Death after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Changes over calendar year time, infections and associated factors. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020, 55, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Herbst, C.; Naumann, F.; Kruse, E.B.; Monsef, I.; Bohlius, J.; Schulz, H.; Engert, A. Prophylactic antibiotics or G-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009, 1, CD007107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hassan, B.A.; Yusoff, Z.B.; Othman, S.B. Filgrastim and antibiotics treatment reduces neutropenia severity in solid cancer patients. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2009, 10, 641–644. [Google Scholar]
  15. Viscoli, C.; on behalf of the EORTC International Antimicrobial Therapy Group. Management of infection in cancer patients. studies of the EORTC International Antimicrobial Therapy Group (IATG). Eur J Cancer 2002, 38 (Suppl. S4), S82–S87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Link, H.; Bohme, A.; Cornely, O.A.; Hoffken, K.; Kellner, O.; Kern, W.V.; Mahlberg, R.; Maschmeyer, G.; Nowrousian, M.R.; Ostermann, H.; et al. Antimicrobial therapy of unexplained fever in neutropenic patients—Guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO), Study Group Interventional Therapy of Unexplained Fever, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Supportivmassnahmen in der Onkologie (ASO) of the Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (DKG-German Cancer Society). Ann. Hematol. 2003, 82 (Suppl. S2), S105–S117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ziglam, H.M.; Gelly, K.; Olver, W. A survey of the management of neutropenic fever in oncology units in the UK. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2007, 29, 430–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Castagnola, E.; Faraci, M. Management of bacteremia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2009, 7, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maertens, J.; Marchetti, O.; Herbrecht, R.; Cornely, O.A.; Fluckiger, U.; Frere, P.; Gachot, B.; Heinz, W.J.; Lass-Florl, C.; Ribaud, P.; et al. European guidelines for antifungal management in leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Summary of the ECIL 3—2009 update. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011, 46, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Averbuch, D.; Orasch, C.; Cordonnier, C.; Livermore, D.M.; Mikulska, M.; Viscoli, C.; Gyssens, I.C.; Kern, W.V.; Klyasova, G.; Marchetti, O.; et al. European guidelines for empirical antibacterial therapy for febrile neutropenic patients in the era of growing resistance: Summary of the 2011 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia. Haematologica 2013, 98, 1826–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Flowers, C.R.; Seidenfeld, J.; Bow, E.J.; Karten, C.; Gleason, C.; Hawley, D.K.; Kuderer, N.M.; Langston, A.A.; Marr, K.A.; Rolston, K.V.; et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis and outpatient management of fever and neutropenia in adults treated for malignancy: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 794–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sepkowitz, K.A. Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002, 29, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Freifeld, A.G.; Bow, E.J.; Sepkowitz, K.A.; Boeckh, M.J.; Ito, J.I.; Mullen, C.A.; Raad, I.I.; Rolston, K.V.; Young, J.A.; Wingard, J.R.; et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 52, e56–e93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. George, B.; Bhattacharya, S. Infections in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Patients. In Contemporary Bone Marrow Transplantation; Organ and Tissue Transplantation; Chandy, M., Radhakrishnan, V., Sukumaran, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  25. Amini, S.; Hadjibabaie, M.; Jahangard-Rafsanjani, Z.; Ashuri, A.; Torkamandi, H.; Ghavamzadeh, A. Evaluation of febrile neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Acta Med. Iran. 2014, 52, 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wangjam, T.; Butler, M.J.; Toro, J.J.; Lee, S.; Gushiken, F. Non-Infectious Fever during Engraftment Following Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Does Plerixafor Play a Role? Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017, 23, S145–S146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sahai, T.; Hauser, N.; Mukkamalla, S.K.R.; Menendez, A.G.; Roberts, T.F.; Tandon, R. Outcomes of febrile neutropenia following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, e18562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jeddi, R.; Achour, M.; Amor, R.B.; Aissaoui, L.; Bouteraa, W.; Kacem, K.; Lakhal, R.B.; Abid, H.B.; BelHadjAli, Z.; Turki, A.; et al. Factors associated with severe sepsis: Prospective study of 94 neutropenic febrile episodes. Hematology 2010, 15, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, M.Y.; Weinstein, R.A.; Hota, B. Delay of active antimicrobial therapy and mortality among patients with bacteremia: Impact of severe neutropenia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 3188–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Median duration of fever days.
Figure 1. Median duration of fever days.
Medicina 58 01157 g001
Table 1. Patient characteristics and relevance of antibiotics given time and clinical variables for reducing fever days in HSCT.
Table 1. Patient characteristics and relevance of antibiotics given time and clinical variables for reducing fever days in HSCT.
Group A
(<30 min)
Group B
(>30 min)
p Value
Number148
Median Age (range) (years)48 (27–63)45 (18–69)0.661
Gender (male/female)10/44/40.362
Diagnosis 0.818
Malignant lymphoma8 (57.1%)5 (62.5%)
Other hematological disorders6 (42.9%)3 (37.5%)
HSCT type 0.343
Autologous HSCT104
Allogeneic HSCT44
Antibiotics level (I/II)5/94/40.662
Death within 30 days after HSCT0 (0%)1 (14.3%)0.389
Antibiotic level I, minimal activity against P. aeruginosa or MRSA. Antibiotics level II, potent activity against broad strain. Abbreviations: HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Table 2. Effects of possible risk factors on fever days in patients receiving HSCT based on multiple regression analysis.
Table 2. Effects of possible risk factors on fever days in patients receiving HSCT based on multiple regression analysis.
Relative risk of Fever Days in HSCT (95% Confidence Interval)p Value
Antibiotics Given Time
(>30 min vs. <30 min)
Medicina 58 01157 i0014.00(2.26 ~ 7.22)0.001
Antibiotics Level
(I vs. II)
−0.80(−2.40 ~ 1.07)0.453
Abbreviations: HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, M.-Y.; Chang, Y.-J.; Lu, Y.-C.; Kuo, C.-H.; Kuo, Y.-H.; Tzeng, S.-C.; Hsu, G.-J. Rapid Administration of Antibiotics for Reducing Fever Days in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Medicina 2022, 58, 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091157

AMA Style

Lee M-Y, Chang Y-J, Lu Y-C, Kuo C-H, Kuo Y-H, Tzeng S-C, Hsu G-J. Rapid Administration of Antibiotics for Reducing Fever Days in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Medicina. 2022; 58(9):1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091157

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Ming-Yang, Yu-Ju Chang, Yin-Che Lu, Chin-Ho Kuo, Ya-Hui Kuo, Shu-Chien Tzeng, and Gwo-Jong Hsu. 2022. "Rapid Administration of Antibiotics for Reducing Fever Days in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation" Medicina 58, no. 9: 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091157

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop