Next Article in Journal
Efficacy of Quantitative Pupillary Light Reflex for Predicting Neurological Outcomes in Patients Treated with Targeted Temperature Management after Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Lobular Difference in Heritability of Brain Atrophy among Elderly Japanese: A Twin Study
Previous Article in Journal
Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Twin Research and Imaging

by
David Laszlo Tarnoki
* and
Adam Domonkos Tarnoki
Medical Imaging Centre, Hungarian Twin Registry, Semmelweis University, 78/A Üllői Street, 1082 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2022, 58(6), 805; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060805
Submission received: 23 May 2022 / Revised: 8 June 2022 / Accepted: 13 June 2022 / Published: 15 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Twin Studies and Imaging)
Twins have been the focus of scientific research for more than a century. Identical twins originate from one egg cell that splits in two at a very early stage of development, whereas non-identical twins are formed when two fertilised eggs implant in the womb at the same time, therefore, monozygotic twins (MZ) share almost 100% of their genes, whereas dizygotic twins (DZ) share 50% of their genes in average [1]. Twins are special subjects of research, as they help to tease apart the effects of nature (genetics) and nurture (environment) on human health.
The classical twin study design relies on studying MZ and DZ twins, which estimates the variance of genetic, shared and unique environmental factors in various phenotypes and diseases [2].
Other important study design is research of identical twins discordant for chronic diseases. In this model, the healthy co-twin serves as a control. The growing number of twin registries worldwide provides a unique resource for clinical, epidemiological, and genetic studies. Twin studies require complex statistical software during the data analysis. Twin studies will continue to be an important tool along with emerging genome and molecular research methods in shedding light on various aspects of human genetics and on how environmental factors, developmental variation and genetics combine to create human traits and behaviours [3].
There are many different types of medical imaging techniques, which use different technologies to produce images for different purposes. The main imaging techniques include radiography, ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and nuclear medicine. The number of innovations is growing, and new imaging techniques are being developed. Imaging studies can be combined with twin research as well, mostly in discordant patient–control samples, which have revealed significant additive genetic influences on some chronic diseases. In the past decade, the number of prospective imaging studies is rising, using mostly non-ionizing imaging modalities, e.g., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound in twins. Low dose computed tomography (CT) imaging provides a unique tool to visualize certain lung diseases or calcified coronary atherosclerosis, which is not visible without X-ray radiation. Imaging has had a rapid development in the last years since artificial intelligence (AI) became one of the most useful tools in radiology. AI will play an increasingly significant role in medical imaging and will become standard in the workflows of radiologists [4].
Research papers in the fields of radiology and/or twin studies are welcome in the current Special Issue entitled “Twin research and imaging”.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the ÚNKP-20-5 and ÚNKP-21-5 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cutler, T.L.; Murphy, K.; Hopper, J.L.; Keogh, L.A.; Dai, Y.; Craig, J.M. Why Accurate Knowledge of Zygosity is Important to Twins. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2015, 18, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Boomsma, D.; Busjahn, A.; Peltonen, L. Classical twin studies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3, 872–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Monalisha, S.; Josyula, G.P. Twin Studies: A Unique Epidemiological Tool. Indian J. Community Med. 2016, 41, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hosny, A.; Parmar, C.; Quackenbush, J.; Schwartz, L.H. Aerts HJWL. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018, 18, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tarnoki, D.L.; Tarnoki, A.D. Twin Research and Imaging. Medicina 2022, 58, 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060805

AMA Style

Tarnoki DL, Tarnoki AD. Twin Research and Imaging. Medicina. 2022; 58(6):805. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060805

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tarnoki, David Laszlo, and Adam Domonkos Tarnoki. 2022. "Twin Research and Imaging" Medicina 58, no. 6: 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060805

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop