Next Article in Journal
Effect of Atorvastatin on Angiogenesis-Related Genes VEGF-A, HGF and IGF-1 and the Modulation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR Transcripts in Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcriptome Sequencing Reveals Salmonella Flagellin Activation of Interferon-β-Related Immune Responses in Macrophages
Previous Article in Journal
The Insulin Receptor Substrate 2 Mediates the Action of Insulin on HeLa Cell Migration via the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of a miRNA Panel with a Potential Determinant Role in Patients Suffering from Periodontitis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
CIMB
Volume 45
Issue 3
10.3390/cimb45030149
cimb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Change in Long Non-Coding RNA Expression Profile Related to the Antagonistic Effect of Clostridium perfringens Type C on Piglet Spleen

by
Zunqiang Yan
,
Pengfei Wang
,
Qiaoli Yang
,
Xiaoli Gao
,
Shuangbao Gun
* and
Xiaoyu Huang
*
College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45(3), 2309-2325; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45030149
Submission received: 5 February 2023 / Revised: 28 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 March 2023 / Published: 9 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Studying the Function of RNAs Using Omics Approaches)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) type C is a spore-forming pathogenic bacterium characterized by the secretion of fatal toxins, which are absorbed into the body, causing diarrhea. Diarrhea has already brought about tremendous economic losses in pig farms worldwide. However, the understanding of lncRNAs’ regulatory mechanisms of the spleen in piglets challenged by C. perfringens type C is still limited. This paper aimed to identify antagonistic lncRNAs associated with the spleen in piglets challenged by C. perfringens type C. The study found that four lncRNAs are involved in immune-/inflammation-related pathways to regulate cytokine genes against C. perfringens type C infection.

Abstract

LncRNAs play important roles in resisting bacterial infection via host immune and inflammation responses. Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) type C is one of the main bacteria causing piglet diarrhea diseases, leading to major economic losses in the pig industry worldwide. In our previous studies, piglets resistant (SR) and susceptible (SS) to C. perfringens type C were identified based on differences in host immune capacity and total diarrhea scores. In this paper, the RNA-Seq data of the spleen were comprehensively reanalyzed to investigate antagonistic lncRNAs. Thus, 14 lncRNAs and 89 mRNAs were differentially expressed (DE) between the SR and SS groups compared to the control (SC) group. GO term enrichment, KEGG pathway enrichment and lncRNA-mRNA interactions were analyzed to identify four key lncRNA targeted genes via MAPK and NF-κB pathways to regulate cytokine genes (such as TNF-α and IL-6) against C. perfringens type C infection. The RT-qPCR results for six selected DE lncRNAs and mRNAs are consistent with the RNA-Seq data. This study analyzed the expression profiling of lncRNAs in the spleen of antagonistic and sensitive piglets and found four key lncRNAs against C. perfringens type C infection. The identification of antagonistic lncRNAs can facilitate investigations into the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to diarrhea in piglets.

1. Introduction

Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) type C is one of the most devastating pathogens related to diarrhea, necrotizing enteritis and struck in animals [1]. Recently, C. perfringens type C-induced diarrhea characterized by a high morbidity and mortality has frequently occurred at large-scale pig farms, leading to huge economic losses around the world [2,3]. Pigs, especially piglets, are infected with this bacterium mainly via the oral digestive tract. Then, an increase in the number of C. perfringens type C bacteria in the small intestine can secrete fatal toxins (at least α and β), which impair tight junction integrity and damage the passages of water and solutes, causing diarrhea [4,5]. Additionally, fatal toxins are usually absorbed by the small intestine and then transported to terminal organs (such as the spleen, liver and brain), leading to host tissue injury and organ damage [3,6,7,8,9]. The traditional method of preventing and controlling this bacterium is antibiotic therapy, although this approach has some disadvantages (including bacterial resistance to many antibiotics and antibiotic residues in pork) [2,5]. Under pressure from the public, the United States and the European Union have taken some measures to ban the application of some medical antibiotics for disease prevention and growth promotion [10,11]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find a new method for preventing and controlling diarrhea caused by C. perfringens type C infection.
The difference in host resistance to pathogens (such as bacteria) is associated with host immunity, pathogen exposure and the interaction of host defense and pathogen virulence [12,13]. Pigs with a G to A mutation at locus M307 of FUT1 can resist Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F18 infection [14]. Moreover, White Leghorn chicken line 6.3 is resistant to Marek’s disease, and line 7.2 is susceptible to Marek’s disease [15]. Additionally, animals with a low immunity are more sensitive to pathogens than those with a strong immunity [16,17,18]. These results suggest that the identification of candidate molecules with resistant pathogens is beneficial for the breeding of new lines for preventing and controlling infectious diseases. At present, the understanding of the molecular mechanism of piglet resistance to C. perfringens type C infection is still limited. Thus, elucidating the underlying molecular regulation of different levels of resistance in piglets challenged by C. perfringens type C will be an effective approach to artificially selecting resistant piglets for controlling diarrhea prevalence and to find some molecular markers of C. perfringens type C resistance.
Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) is a class of non-coding RNAs with more than 200 nucleotides and present in many species, such as pigs [19], zebrafish [20] and humans [21]. Recently, lncRNAs are receiving more attention because of their important regulatory roles in biological processes, such as normal development, metabolic diseases, cardiovascular diseases and tumor formation [22,23]. Furthermore, lncRNAs also play important roles in autoimmune diseases (such as autoimmune hepatitis [24] and systemic lupus erythematosus [25]) and infectious diseases (including diarrhea [26], malaria [27] and African trypanosomes [28]). However, lncRNAs and their target genes related to C. perfringens type C resistance in piglets are poorly understood. The use of RNA-Seq to identify lncRNAs against C. perfringens type C infection in pigs is the basis for revealing the molecular mechanism of disease resistance and, thus, for discovering candidate genes related to disease resistance traits.
The spleen is the main immune organ, and it plays important roles in filtering blood-borne pathogens and antigens to protect the host against various infectious diseases and pathogen infections [29,30,31]. Herein, the spleen is regarded as the ideal organ model for exploring host resistance and susceptibility to pathogenic challenges. Studies of disease resistance have been performed in sheep spleen [32,33], chicken spleen [15,34] and pig spleen [35]. Additionally, differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs in two spleen phenotypes, antagonistic or sensitive to C. perfringens type C, were identified using RNA-Seq in our previous study [36]. However, our previous research only focused on identifying molecules associated with resistance and susceptibility to C. perfringens type C, and we did not further investigate how these molecules function in the process of C. perfringens type C infection. In a continuation of our previous research, the aim of this study was to comprehensively identify and reanalyze the dysregulated lncRNAs and mRNAs in the spleen of resistant and sensitive piglets. Our study provides new insights into piglet antagonism to C. perfringens type C in terms of lncRNAs, which also contributes to formulating a breeding strategy against C. perfringens type C infection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design and Sample Collection

The experimental piglets were purchased from the nucleus herd in Dingxi city, Gansu province. We randomly selected a total of 30 seven-day-old piglets displaying normal growth and approximately similar body weight. Additionally, the piglets were not infected with Escherichia coli, Salmonella or C. perfringens, as tested using ELISA kits (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). Among these piglets, 5 piglets were selected to form the control group (SC). The other 25 piglets were challenged by a C. perfringens type C strain (CVCC 2032), and the top 5 and bottom 5 piglets according to total diarrhea scores were considered the susceptible group (SS) and the resistant group (SR) by using a previously described method [36,37].
The spleen and other tissues from the piglets in the SC, SR and SS groups were collected. Then, these tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until used for RNA isolation. Moreover, the spleen was obtained and stored at −80 °C for detecting cytokine expression levels using RT-qPCR and concentration using ELISA.

2.2. Total RNA Isolation

The total RNA was extracted from each individual sample using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). In addition, the purity and quantity of the total RNA were determined using a Nanodrop instrument (Implen, Westlake Village, CA, USA). The integrity of the spleen total RNA was measured using a Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.3. Library Preparation for lncRNA Sequencing

A total of 3 μg of spleen total RNA was used to construct lncRNA sequencing libraries by utilizing a previous method [36]. Furthermore, the lncRNA sequencing libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 4000 platform, and 150 bp paired-end reads were obtained at the Novogene Bioinformatics Institute (Beijing, China).

2.4. Quality Control and Mapping

The raw reads (raw data) were first processed using in-house Perl scripts. In this step, clean reads (clean data) were generated by removing reads that contained adapters or over 10% of ploy-N, or low-quality reads (>50% of bases whose Phred scores were <5%) based on the raw data. At the same time, the Phred score (Q20, Q30) and GC content of the clean reads were assessed. The clean reads were mapped to the pig reference genome with Tophat (2.0.9 version) [38].

2.5. Transcriptome Assembly and Expression Level Quantification

The mapped reads of each individual sample were assembled using Cufflinks (2.1.1 version) [38] and Scripture (beta2 version) [39]. Cuffdiff (2.1.1 version) [40] was used to evaluate the lncRNA and mRNA expression levels by Fragments Per Kilobase Million (FPKM). For biological replicates, the lncRNAs and mRNAs with a P-adjust < 0.05 were described as differentially expressed (DE) among three group comparisons (SR vs. SC, SR vs. SS and SS vs. SC).

2.6. Coding Potential Analysis and Target Gene Prediction

To achieve highly reliable novel lncRNAs, previously stringent filtering criteria were used [36]. In addition, protein-coding genes 100 k downstream and upstream of the lncRNAs were considered the cis target genes. The trans target genes of the lncRNAs were obtained by examining the expression levels of the lncRNAs and mRNAs with custom scripts (Pearson correlation coefficient ≥0.95).

2.7. Enrichment Analysis of GO and KEGG

Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses of DE lncRNA target genes and DE mRNAs were implemented using the GOseq R package (1.50.0 version) [41]. KEGG pathway analyses of DE lncRNA target genes and DE mRNAs were performed using KOBAS software (3.0 version) [42].

2.8. Heat Map Construction and lncRNA Secondary Structure Prediction

A hierarchical heat map analysis was performed using OmicShare tools, a free online platform for data analyses (http://www.omicshare.com/tools (accessed on 8 November 2022)). The prediction of the secondary structure of the lncRNAs was conducted based on the free energy using the RNAFold web server online tool (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAWebSuite/RNAfold.cgi (accessed on 11 December 2022)).

2.9. RT-qPCR Assay and ELISA Detection

The total RNA of the spleen tissues used for RNA-Seq were reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a PrimeScript™ RT Reagent kit (Takara, Dalian, China). The primers were designed in Primer3, and primer specificity was assessed using Primer-BLAST (Table S1). An RT-qPCR assay was performed in a reaction system containing 7.5 µL of RNase free ddH2O, 1 µL of cDNA, 1 µL of reverse primer, 1 µL of forward primer and 9.5 µL of the SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Takara, Dalian, China) using a LightCycler 480II instrument (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The thermal cycler conditions included an initial pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min and 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 58 ± 1 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 20 s. LncRNA and mRNA expressions were quantified relative to β-actin expression using the 2−∆∆Ct method [43]. All ELISA processes were conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentrations of cytokines (including TNF-α, IFN-γ, IFN-α, IL-6 and IL-8) in the spleen tissue were determined using an ELISA kit (Kete Biotech, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China). The RT-qPCR and ELISA data are presented as Mean ± SE. A one-way ANOVA was performed to calculate statistical significance followed by Duncan’s test using SPSS (25.0 version).

3. Results

3.1. Analyses of Differentially Expressed lncRNAs

To identify the lncRNAs and mRNAs in the C. perfringens type C-challenged piglets in the SR, SS and SC groups, RNA libraries of the spleen samples were constructed and sequenced. The results indicate that 177 lncRNAs (including 45 down-regulated and 132 up-regulated) and 1707 mRNAs (including 919 down-regulated and 788 up-regulated) were significantly dysregulated between the SS and SC groups (Figure 1A,B and Table S2). A total of 174 lncRNAs and 1542 mRNAs between the SR and SC groups were differentially expressed (Figure 1A,B, and Table S3). A total of 19 lncRNAs (including 10 down-regulated and 9 up-regulated) and 123 mRNAs (including 80 down-regulated and 43 up-regulated) were identified between the SR and SS groups (Figure 1C,D). In addition, 1 lncRNA and 13 mRNAs were significantly expressed among the three SR, SS and SC groups (Figure 1A,B). According to the visible lncRNA and mRNA levels in the SR, SS and SC groups, the DE lncRNAs were distributed across all chromosomes. Chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 7 and 13 displayed more DE lncRNAs (Figure 2A). The distribution densities of the DE mRNAs were different. Most of the DE mRNAs were distributed among chromosomes 1, 2 and 13. However, there were no DE mRNAs in chromosome Y (Figure 2B). Compared to the SC group, a total of 14 lncRNAs and 89 mRNAs were found to be differentially expressed between the SR and SS groups (Figure 1A,B). Table 1 shows the detailed information of these molecules, which were used as potential resources for identifying the lncRNAs related to the antagonistic effects of C. perfringens type C on piglet spleen.
To investigate the expression patterns among the three SR, SS and SC groups, we used the 14 DE lncRNAs and 89 DE mRNAs to generate a hierarchical heat map. The heat map of the DE lncRNAs and mRNAs in the spleen of the three groups revealed that the SS and SR groups were clustered together because of their similar expression profiles (Figure 3A,B).

3.2. Characterization of lncRNA Subtypes

Previous studies have noted major differences in gene structures and expression levels among two subtypes of lncRNAs. Thus, the transcript length, expression level, exon count and ORF length among the different subtypes of lncRNAs were analyzed. The lengths of lincRNAs were greater than those of antisense lncRNAs, with a mean length of 4.778 kb vs. 4.353 kb, respectively. There were no significant differences in length (p = 0.9118, Figure 4A). In particular, the lincRNAs showed a higher expression level than the antisense lncRNAs (p = 0.0212, Figure 4B). Clear differences in the exon count (p = 0.0003, Figure 4C) and ORF length (p = 0.0051, Figure 4D) were observed between the two lncRNA subtypes.

3.3. Functional Analyses of C. perfringens Type C-Responsive lncRNAs and mRNAs

The secondary structures of the lncRNAs were predicted, which was helpful in recognizing the functions of these lncRNAs. A total of 10 lncRNAs had secondary structures, which mainly included a hairpin loop, a stem loop, an inner ring, a bulge ring and a multi-branch loop (Figure 5). Nevertheless, four lncRNAs (namely, LNC_001987, LNC_001097, LNC_001253 and LNC_001985) had no secondary structures because of their excessive lengths.
To further investigate the functions of the lncRNAs, the potential target genes of the 14 identified lncRNAs in cis (co-location) and trans (co-expression) were predicted. The prediction results show that a total of 17 interaction relationships were established in cis between 8 lncRNAs and 17 protein-coding genes in the pig genome (Table S4). In addition, these results indicate that 4 lncRNAs corresponded to 93 protein-coding genes within a range of 100 kb in trans (Table S4). However, the target genes of LNC_001595, LNC_000191, LNC_001065 and LNC_000042 were not predicted because of a possibly incomplete pig genome annotation, which suggests that the pig reference genome annotation should be improved. The target genes of these DE lncRNAs are displayed in Table 2. Next, the predicted target genes of these lncRNAs were examined using GO term and KEGG pathway analyses. A total of 1914 GO terms via cis and trans function analyses were identified in the SR vs. SS group compared to the SC group (Table S5). Among these GO terms, 115 significantly enriched GO terms (p < 0.01) were obtained from the cis and trans function analyses. The top 30 enriched GO terms are listed in Figure 6. For biological processes, the most enriched GO terms were related to the immune response, including the regulation of the humoral immune response, the positive regulation of T-cell-mediated immunity, the positive regulation of cytokine production and the response to bacteria. For cellular components, the main represented category was the interleukin-12 complex. For molecular functions, the main represented GO terms were interleukin-17 binding, interleukin-12 beta subunit binding and protein tyrosine kinase activity. Moreover, the KEGG pathway analysis showed that a total of 51 pathways were detected (Table S5). Among these KEGG pathways, a total of three KEGG pathways were significantly enriched (p < 0.05). The top 20 KEGG pathways are shown in Figure 7. Some KEGG pathways (such as inflammatory bowel disease, cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction and Leishmaniasis) were associated with the immune response and infectious diseases.
Furthermore, GO term and KEGG pathway analyses of the 89 DE mRNAs were performed. In the SR vs. SS group compared to the SC group, a total of 2336 different GO terms were obtained, and 74 GO terms were significantly enriched (corrected p value < 0.05) (Table S6). For biological processes, the most enriched GO terms were related to the inflammatory response, including the innate immune response and Toll-like receptor 4 binding. For cellular components, the main represented categories were extracellular space and the extracellular region. For molecular functions, the main represented GO terms were monocarboxylic acid binding and Toll-like receptor binding. A total of 10 KEGG pathways were significantly enriched (p < 0.05), and several immune-related KEGG pathways (such as NF-κB, Jak-STAT and TNF) were identified (Table S6). Several immune-response-related genes participated in these KEGG pathways, such as CD14 and DDX58 in the NF-κB signaling pathway, HSPA1L in antigen processing and presentation and IL1R2 and CD14 in the MAPK signaling pathway.

3.4. RT-qPCR Validation and Tissue Expression Profiling of LNC_001595

The expression levels of four DE lncRNAs and two DE mRNAs were detected using RT-qPCR to validate the reliability of our RNA-Seq data. In addition, three genes (PIK3R4, CMPK2 and GADD45G) were selected to detect expression levels. These results show that the trends of these DE lncRNAs and mRNAs determined using RNA-Seq are consistent with those from the RT-qPCR (Figure 8A–C). Lastly, the PIK3R4, CMPK2 and GADD45G genes were differentially expressed between the SR and SS groups (Figure 8D).
Previous studies reported that one of the features of lncRNAs is their remarkable tissue specificity. Hence, to verify the tissue specificity of the lncRNAs, we selected one lncRNA (LNC_001595) to detect the expression level in various tissues. Expression profiling across different pig tissues indicated that the transcript LNC_001595 was highly expressed in the spleen, lymph nodes and thymus (Figure 9).

3.5. The Identification of lncRNAs Antagonistic to C. perfringens Type C

Compared with SC, a total of 14 lncRNAs and 89 mRNAs were identified as being DE in the SR vs. SS group. After C. perfringens type C infection, dysregulated ALDBSSCT0000003048, ALDBSSCT0000009442, LNC_001097, ALDBSSCT0000007366 and ALDBSSCT0000006918 regulated several immune genes (such as PIK3R4, ADGRG3, RSAD2, CMPK2 and GADD45G) via cis and trans. At the same time, these DE target genes in SR vs. SS were mainly enriched in some important immune-related KEGG pathways, including inflammatory bowel disease; cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction; Toll-like receptor; and Jak-STAT, which has been reported to be related to bacterial infection, especially C. perfringens infection. These results suggest that the lncRNAs and their target genes had potential effects on these C. perfringens-related KEGG pathways. To investigate these lncRNAs’ potential roles in C. perfringens type C infection, two criteria were used in this study by following a previous method [37]. Firstly, differentially expressed lncRNA target genes via cis and trans were found to participate in the immune response. Secondly, the downstream immune-related cytokine genes of immune response genes were identified using KEGG pathways and some scientific research papers. Based on the above method, four lncRNAs were identified. These target genes of lncRNAs possibly indirectly or directly regulated cytokine genes in the process of C. perfringens type C infection. Therefore, cytokine gene expression levels and concentrations (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IFN-α, IL-6 and IL-8) were evaluated (Figure 10). To further investigate how lncRNAs function, we constructed a potential diagram among key lncRNAs, target genes and cytokines (Figure 11). For example, ALDBSSCT0000009442 could positively regulate its target gene ADGRG3, and over-expressed ADGRG3 triggered the expression of IL-6 through the NF-κB pathway to improve immunity against C. perfringens type C infection.

4. Discussion

Recently, due to the rapid development of RNA-Seq technology, lncRNAs have been regarded as new modulators related to infectious diseases, such as malaria [44], diarrhea [32], hepatitis [45] and tuberculosis [46]. Diarrhea caused by C. perfringens type C often leads to major economic losses in pig farms. However, the understanding of the functions of lncRNAs in the spleen of piglets infected with C. perfringens type C is limited. Therefore, we used deep Illumina sequencing and bioinformatics analyses to identify lncRNAs in the spleen of piglets in response to C. perfringens type C infection in our previous study [36]. Nevertheless, we did not comprehensively explore how lncRNAs work during C. perfringens type C infection. Thus, these dysregulated lncRNAs and their target genes in regulating the resistance of piglets infected with C. perfringens type C were investigated in this paper.
Tissue specificity is a feature of lncRNAs, unlike protein-coding genes [22]. Thus, LNC_001595 was selected to evaluate the expression levels in different tissues. Indeed, LNC_001595 was highly expressed in the lymph nodes and spleen, which displayed tissue specificity. Additionally, lincRNA showed a greater length, a higher expression level, a lower exon count and a shorter ORF length than those of antisense lncRNAs. These results are consistent with those of other studies [47,48].
Characterizing the structure of lncRNAs is necessary for understanding their mechanism at almost every level of gene function and regulation. The local single-chain structures, local secondary structure motifs and tertiary structure motifs of lncRNAs can interact with target genes to perform biological functions. At present, it is difficult to determine the tertiary structure of lncRNAs. The secondary structure of lncRNA target molecules is beneficial for investigating their function mechanism and exploring the relationship between the structure and function of lncRNAs. In this paper, a total of 10 lncRNAs had secondary structures, including a hairpin loop, a stem loop, an inner ring, a bulge ring and a multi-branch loop. Interestingly, the secondary structures of two lncRNAs (namely, ALDBSSCT0000009442 and LNC_000263) are consistent with two lncRNA structures in another study [37].
In order to identify the key lncRNAs against C. perfringens type C, we referenced two criteria by using a previous method [37]. Based on this method, a potential relationship among four lncRNAs, target genes and cytokines was identified. Four lncRNAs (namely, ALDBSSCT0000003048, ALDBSSCT0000007366, ALDBSSCT0000009442 and ALDBSSCT0000006918) targeted some immune genes (such as PIK3R4, ADGRG3 and GADD45G) via cytokines to exhibit the antagonistic effects of C. perfringens type C on the piglet spleen. A previous study found that the inflammation-related cytokine genes IL-1β, IFN-α, TNF-α and NF-κB in the blood had a higher over-expression after infection with C. perfringens type C [37]. In this study, cytokine gene expression levels and cytokine contents in the spleen were detected. Indeed, cytokine expression levels and concentrations were obviously increased in the spleen of the piglets challenged by C. perfringens type C. Similarly, the levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IFN-α, IL-6 and IL-8 were obviously increased in NE chickens caused by C. perfringens [15,34]. Moreover, the concentrations of these cytokines were significantly higher in those in the diarrhea group than in those in the healthy group. These results suggest that the DE lncRNAs in SR vs. SS can affect their target genes through immune-related KEGG pathways to regulate downstream cytokine genes in the piglet inflammatory and immune responses to resist C. perfringens type C. The higher-expressed cytokines were beneficial to the inflammation response in the piglets, which may be related to resistance to C. perfringens type C infection.
PIK3R4, also named Vps15 or p150, is one of the immune genes targeted by ALDBSSCT0000003048, and it participates in the regulation of the autophagy pathway. PIK3R4 as a regulatory subunit plays an important role in autophagosome formation and maturation, which is activated and accelerated under the nutrient-limiting status to supply nutrients for cell survival [49,50]. Up-regulated PIK3R4 can enhance the process of autophagy. Additionally, PIK3R4 plays key roles in the immune system to resist disease via the PI3K/AKT pathway [51]. In our study, the expression level of ALDBSSCT0000003048 in the SR group was higher than that in the SS group. Correspondingly, the expression of level of PIK3R4 in the SR group was also higher than that in the SS group. Then, up-regulated ALDBSSCT0000003048 targeted PIK3R4 to stimulate autophagy and secrete massive amounts of TNF-α and IFN-γ against C. perfringens type C infection.
CMPK2 and RSAD2 were regulated by ALDBSSCT0000007366. CMPK2 is closely related to monocytic/macrophage terminal differentiation and played important roles in resisting pathogenic microorganisms [52,53]. RSAD2, also called viperin, has been reported to be associated with the innate immune response system and is commonly up-regulated by LPS, type I interferons and microorganism infections [54,55]. In our study, down-regulated ALDBSSCT0000007366 in the SS and SR groups may have depressed the expressions of CMPK2 and RSAD2. CMPK2 via the Remdesivir pathway and RSAD2 via the Influenza A pathway produce IFN-α for resisting C. perfringens type C infection.
ADGRG3 was regulated by ALDBSSCT0000009442. GPR97, encoded by ADGRG3, is expressed in immune cells (including neutrophils, mast cells and macrophagocytes), and it is involved in many diseases’ inflammation by regulating the activity of NF-κB and then stimulating cytokine production (such as IL-6) [56,57]. Additionally, WT mice have more severe inflammation caused by obesity than ADGRG3−/− mice [56]. In this study, the expression of ADGRG3 was significantly increased after the piglets were challenged by C. perfringens type C, and the expression of this gene in the SS group was higher than that in the SR group. Therefore, the higher-expressed ALDBSSCT0000009442 targeting ADGRG3 might have some association with the expression of IL-6, and the higher-expressed IL-6 reflected that the piglets in the SR group may have immense inflammatory responses that may be beneficial to resisting C. perfringens type C infection.
GADD45G was regulated by ALDBSSCT0000006918. GADD45G plays an important role in the activation of p38 MAP kinase, which promotes IFN-γ cytokine production against pathogenic bacteria [58,59]. Indeed, the deletion of GADD45G genes in mice leads to an obviously reduced number of TH1 cells for resisting Listeria monocytogenes [60]. Compared with the SC group, the GADD45G expression level in the SS and SR groups was drastically increased after the piglets were infected with C. perfringens type C. GADD45G was significantly up-regulated in the SR group compared with that in the SS group. In our previous study, the expression level of ALDBSSCT0000006918 in the SS and SR groups was obviously increased [36]. This shows that up-regulated ALDBSSCT0000006918 targets GADD45G to secrete massive amounts of IFN-γ and IL-8 for resisting C. perfringens type C infection.
The above results indicate the relationship between the expressions of lncRNAs and their target genes, suggesting that dysregulated lncRNAs affected their target genes, causing them to participate in the biological process. Thus, these results reflect the resistance of piglets during C. perfringens type C infection.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the identification of lncRNAs in the spleen of piglets who were antagonistic or sensitive to diarrhea caused by C. perfringens type C was carried out. Our study indicates that DE lncRNAs regulated target genes to adjust the immune system of piglet spleen, which further influenced the difference in the piglet’s resistance to C. perfringens type C infection. This study provides new insights into comprehensively understanding the regulation of lncRNAs in piglet disease resistance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb45030149/s1, Table S1: Primer sequence for mRNAs, lncRNAs and cytokine genes; Table S2: Differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs between SS and SC; Table S3: Differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs between SR and SC; Table S4: Target genes of 14 lncRNAs in cis and trans; Table S5: GO enrichment and KEGG pathway analyses of the protein-coding target genes of 14 lncRNAs; Table S6: Functional enrichment analysis of 89 differentially expressed mRNAs.

Author Contributions

Z.Y. performed the main experiment and wrote the paper; Q.Y. conceived and designed the experiments; X.H. and Z.Y. participated in analyzing the data; P.W. and X.G. were involved in the formal analysis; S.G. and X.H. guided the execution of the study and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Youth Science Fund of the College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University (GAU-DK-QNJJ-202110).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, approved the animal study. All experimental procedures were performed in strict accordance with the recommendations of the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology, China; revised in June 2004).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequencing data were submitted to the Genome Expression Omnibus (Accession numbers GSE105797) in NCBI.

Acknowledgments

We thank Gansu Research Center for Swine Production Engineering and Technology for providing us with technological support. We thank Shouhu Li for language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Songer, J.G. Clostridia as agents of zoonotic disease. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 140, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Songer, J.G.; Uzal, F.A. Clostridial enteric infections in pigs. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2005, 17, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Miclard, J.; Jaggi, M.; Sutter, E.; Wyder, M.; Grabscheid, B.; Posthaus, H. Clostridium perfringens beta-toxin targets endothelial cells in necrotizing enteritis in piglets. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 137, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Petit, L.; Gibert, M.; Popoff, M.R. Clostridium perfringens: Toxinotype and genotype. Trends Microbiol. 1999, 7, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Uzal, F.A.; McClane, B.A. Recent progress in understanding the pathogenesis of Clostridium perfringens type C infections. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 153, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Matsushita, O.; Okabe, A. Clostridial hydrolytic enzymes degrading extracellular components. Toxicon 2001, 39, 1769–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sakurai, J.; Nagahama, M.; Oda, M. Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin: Characterization and mode of action. J. Biochem. 2004, 136, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Schumacher, V.L.; Martel, A.; Pasmans, F.; Van Immerseel, F.; Posthaus, H. Endothelial binding of beta toxin to small intestinal mucosal endothelial cells in early stages of experimentally induced Clostridium perfringens type C enteritis in pigs. Vet. Pathol. 2013, 50, 626–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lawrence, G.; Cooke, R. Experimental pigbel: The production and pathology of necrotizing enteritis due to Clostridium welchii type C in the guinea-pig. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1980, 61, 261–271. [Google Scholar]
  10. Seal, B.S.; Lillehoj, H.S.; Donovan, D.M.; Gay, C.G. Alternatives to antibiotics: A symposium on the challenges and solutions for animal production. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2013, 14, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Robinson, K.; Ma, X.; Liu, Y.; Qiao, S.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, G. Dietary modulation of endogenous host defense peptide synthesis as an alternative approach to in-feed antibiotics. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 4, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Worley, M.J. Immune evasion and persistence in enteric bacterial pathogens. Gut Microbes 2023, 15, 2163839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Plotniece, A.; Sobolev, A.; Supuran, C.T.; Carta, F.; Bjoerkling, F.; Franzyk, H.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J.; Augustyns, K.; Cos, P.; De Vooght, L.; et al. Selected strategies to fight pathogenic bacteria. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2155816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vogeli, P.; Meijerink, E.; Fries, R.; Neuenschwander, S.; Vorlander, N.; Stranzinger, G.; Bertschinger, H.U. A molecular test for the detection of E. Coli F18 receptors: A breakthrough in the struggle against edema disease and post-weaning diarrhea in swine. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 1997, 139, 479–484. [Google Scholar]
  15. Anh Duc, T.; Hong, Y.H.; Lillehoj, H.S. RNA-Seq profiles of immune related genes in the spleen of necrotic enteritis-afflicted chicken lines. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 28, 1496–1511. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jie, Z.; Chun-Yan, L.; Jing-Ping, L.; Ren, G.; Hui, W.; Juan, P.; Sheng-Lan, L. Immunoregulation on mice of low immunity and effects on five kinds of human cancer cells of panax japonicus polysaccharide. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 839697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhao, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Huang, B.; Xu, C.; Zhang, B.; Bai, P.; Liu, C. Phenotypic, genomic, and transcriptomic changes in an acinetobacter baumannii strain after spaceflight in China’s tiangong-2 space laboratory. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2022, 53, 1447–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, W.-H.; Hui, T.-C.; Wu, Q.-Q.; Xu, C.-A.; Zhou, Z.-W.; Wang, S.-H.; Zheng, W.; Yin, Q.-Q.; Li, X.; Pan, H.-Y. Pneumocystis jirovecii and legionella pneumophila coinfection in a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A case report. World J. Clin. Cases 2021, 9, 8595–8601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kosinska-Selbi, B.; Mielczarek, M.; Szyda, J. Review: Long non-coding RNA in livestock. Animal 2020, 14, 2003–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Goudarzi, M.; Berg, K.; Pieper, L.M.; Schier, A.F. Individual long non-coding RNAs have no overt functions in zebrafish embryogenesis, viability and fertility. Elife 2019, 8, e40815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Iempridee, T.; Wiwithaphon, S.; Piboonprai, K.; Pratedrat, P.; Khumkhrong, P.; Japrung, D.; Temisak, S.; Laiwejpithaya, S.; Chaopotong, P.; Dharakul, T. Identification of reference genes for circulating long noncoding RNA analysis in serum of cervical cancer patients. FEBS Open Bio 2018, 8, 1844–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ponting, C.P.; Oliver, P.L.; Reik, W. Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell 2009, 136, 629–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wang, K.C.; Chang, H.Y. Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs. Mol. Cell 2011, 43, 904–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sirbe, C.; Simu, G.; Szabo, I.; Grama, A.; Pop, T.L. Pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis-cellular and molecular mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, C.-N.; Mao, Y.-M.; Liu, L.-N.; Li, X.-M.; Wang, D.-G.; Pan, H.-F. Emerging role of lncRNAs in systemic lupus erythematosus. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 106, 584–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marete, A.; Ariel, O.; Ibeagha-Awemu, E.; Bissonnette, N. Identification of long non-coding RNA isolated from naturally infected macrophages and associated with bovine johne’s disease in Canadian holstein using a combination of neural networks and logistic regression. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 639053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lodde, V.; Floris, M.; Muroni, M.R.; Cucca, F.; Idda, M.L. Non-coding RNAs in malaria infection. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-RNA 2022, 13, e1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guegan, F.; Rajan, K.S.; Bento, F.; Pinto-Neves, D.; Sequeira, M.; Guminska, N.; Mroczek, S.; Dziembowski, A.; Cohen-Chalamish, S.; Doniger, T.; et al. A long noncoding RNA promotes parasite differentiation in African trypanosomes. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabn2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bronte, V.; Pittet, M.J. The spleen in local and systemic regulation of immunity. Immunity 2013, 39, 806–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gupta, A.; Gawandi, S.; Vandna; Yadav, I.; Mohan, H.; Desai, V.G.; Kumar, S. Analysis of fluoro based pyrazole analogues as a potential therapeutics candidate against japanese encephalitis virus infection. Virus Res. 2023, 323, 198955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hosseindoust, A.; Ha, S.; Lokhande, A.; Mun, J.; Kim, Y.I.; Kim, J. The targeted anti-salmonella bacteriophage attenuated the inflammatory response of laying hens challenged with salmonella gallinarum. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jin, C.; Bao, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, W.; Wu, T.; Wang, L.; Lv, X.; Gao, W.; Wang, B.; Zhu, G.; et al. Changes in long non-coding RNA expression profiles related to the antagonistic effects of escherichia coli F17 on lamb spleens. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Jin, C.; Bao, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, W.; Zou, S.; Wu, T.; Wang, L.; Lv, X.; Gao, W.; Wang, B.; et al. Changes in circRNA expression profiles related to the antagonistic effects of escherichia coli F17 in lamb spleens. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Hong, Y.H.; Hue, D.; Lillehoj, H.S.; Song, K.-D.; Oh, J.-D. Differential regulation of microRNA transcriptome in chicken lines resistant and susceptible to necrotic enteritis disease. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 1383–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gaur, U.; Xiong, Y.Y.; Luo, Q.P.; Yuan, F.Y.; Wu, H.Y.; Qiao, M.; Wimmers, K.; Li, K.; Mei, S.Q.; Liu, G.S. Breed-specific transcriptome response of spleen from six to eight week old piglet after infection with streptococcus suis type 2. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 41, 7865–7873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yan, Z.; Huang, X.; Sun, W.; Yang, Q.; Shi, H.; Jiang, T.; Li, S.; Wang, P.; Gun, S. Analyses of long non-coding RNA and mRNA profiling in the spleen of diarrheic piglets caused by Clostridium perfringens type C. PeerJ 2018, 6, e5997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Huang, X.Y.; Sun, W.Y.; Yan, Z.Q.; Shi, H.R.; Yang, Q.L.; Wang, P.F.; Li, S.G.; Liu, L.X.; Zhao, S.G.; Gun, S.B. Novel insights reveal anti-microbial gene regulation of piglet intestine immune in response to Clostridium perfringens infection. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Trapnell, C.; Roberts, A.; Goff, L.; Pertea, G.; Kim, D.; Kelley, D.R.; Pimentel, H.; Salzberg, S.L.; Rinn, J.L.; Pachter, L. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments with Tophat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7, 562–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Guttman, M.; Garber, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Donaghey, J.; Robinson, J.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Koziol, M.J.; Gnirke, A.; Nusbaum, C.; et al. Ab initio reconstruction of cell type-specific transcriptomes in mouse reveals the conserved multi-exonic structure of lincRNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Trapnell, C.; Williams, B.A.; Pertea, G.; Mortazavi, A.; Kwan, G.; van Baren, M.J.; Salzberg, S.L.; Wold, B.J.; Pachter, L. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Young, M.D.; Wakefield, M.J.; Smyth, G.K.; Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-Seq: Accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Mao, X.; Cai, T.; Olyarchuk, J.G.; Wei, L. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG orthology (ko) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3787–3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta c(t)) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Broadbent, K.M.; Broadbent, J.C.; Ribacke, U.; Wirth, D.; Rinn, J.L.; Sabeti, P.C. Strand-specific RNA sequencing in plasmodium falciparum malaria identifies developmentally regulated long non-coding RNA and circular RNA. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Huang, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, C.; Yuan, S.; Wang, Y.; Tang, G.; Zhou, W.; Sun, S. Hepatitis b virus X protein (HBx)-related long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) down-regulated expression by HBx (Dreh) inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by targeting the intermediate filament protein vimentin. Hepatology 2013, 57, 1882–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, M.; Cui, J.; Niu, W.; Huang, J.; Feng, T.; Sun, B.; Yao, H. Long non-coding PCED1B-AS1 regulates macrophage apoptosis and autophagy by sponging miR-155 in active tuberculosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 509, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, Y.; Xue, S.; Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Hu, T.; Qiu, X.; Zhang, J.; Lei, M. Analyses of long non-coding RNA and mRNA profiling using RNA sequencing during the pre-implantation phases in pig endometrium. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ren, H.; Wang, G.; Chen, L.; Jiang, J.; Liu, L.; Li, N.; Zhao, J.; Sun, X.; Zhou, P. Genome-wide analysis of long non-coding RNAs at early stage of skin pigmentation in goats (capra hircus). BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Shen, H.-M.; Codogno, P. Autophagic cell death loch ness monster or endangered species? Autophagy 2011, 7, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Yu, X.; Long, Y.C.; Shen, H.-M. Differential regulatory functions of three classes of phosphatidylinositol and phosphoinositide 3-kinases in autophagy. Autophagy 2015, 11, 1711–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Huang, J.; Zhang, L.; Greshock, J.; Colligon, T.A.; Wang, Y.; Ward, R.; Katsaros, D.; Lassus, H.; Butzow, R.; Godwin, A.K.; et al. Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3K/AKT pathway in primary ovarian cancer predict patient outcome. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011, 50, 606–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. El-Diwany, R.; Soliman, M.; Sugawara, S.; Breitwieser, F.; Skaist, A.; Coggiano, C.; Sangal, N.; Chattergoon, M.; Bailey, J.R.; Siliciano, R.F.; et al. CMPK2 and BCL-G are associated with type 1 interferon-induced hiv restriction in humans. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat0843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Chen, Y.-L.; Lin, D.-W.; Chang, Z.-F. Identification of a putative human mitochondrial thymidine monophosphate kinase associated with monocytic/macrophage terminal differentiation. Genes Cells 2008, 13, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ebrahimi, K.H. A unifying view of the broad-spectrum antiviral activity of RSAD2 (viperin) based on its radical-sam chemistry. Metallomics 2018, 10, 539–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chin, K.C.; Cresswell, P. Viperin (cig5), an ifn-inducible antiviral protein directly induced by human cytomegalovirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 15125–15130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Shi, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Du, B.; Wang, Z.; Liu, M.; Jiang, W.; Qian, M.; Ren, H. GPR97 is dispensable for metabolic syndrome but is involved in macrophage inflammation in high-fat diet-induced obesity in mice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Chen, X.; Lu, S.; Kuang, Y.; Fei, J.; Wang, Z. GPR97/ADGRG3 ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by regulating cytokine expression. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2018, 50, 666–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Hoffmeyer, A.; Piekorz, R.; Moriggl, R.; Ihle, J.N. GADD45G is dispensable for normal mouse development and T-cell proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 3137–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lu, B.; Yu, H.; Chow, C.; Li, B.; Zheng, W.; Davis, R.J.; Flavell, R.A. GADD45G mediates the activation of the p38 and jnk map kinase pathways and cytokine production in effector TH1 cells. Immunity 2001, 14, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lu, B. The molecular mechanisms that control function and death of effector CD4+ T cells. Immunol. Res. 2006, 36, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cimb 45 00149 g001 550
Figure 1. Analysis of DE lncRNAs and mRNAs in the spleen. Venn diagram showing DE lncRNAs (A) and mRNAs (B) among SR vs. SC, SS vs. SC and SR vs. SC groups. Volcano plot presenting DE lncRNAs (C) and mRNAs (D) between SR and SC groups.
Figure 1. Analysis of DE lncRNAs and mRNAs in the spleen. Venn diagram showing DE lncRNAs (A) and mRNAs (B) among SR vs. SC, SS vs. SC and SR vs. SC groups. Volcano plot presenting DE lncRNAs (C) and mRNAs (D) between SR and SC groups.
Cimb 45 00149 g001
Cimb 45 00149 g002 550
Figure 2. Distributions of DE lncRNAs and mRNAs in pig chromosome. The x-axis indicates different chromosomes, and the y-axis indicates the number of lncRNAs or mRNAs.
Figure 2. Distributions of DE lncRNAs and mRNAs in pig chromosome. The x-axis indicates different chromosomes, and the y-axis indicates the number of lncRNAs or mRNAs.
Cimb 45 00149 g002
Cimb 45 00149 g003 550
Figure 3. Hierarchical heat map showing the expression values for lncRNAs (A) and mRNAs (B).
Figure 3. Hierarchical heat map showing the expression values for lncRNAs (A) and mRNAs (B).
Cimb 45 00149 g003
Cimb 45 00149 g004 550
Figure 4. Genomic features of the different subtypes of lncRNAs. (A)Transcript length, (B) expression level, (C) exon count and (D) ORF length of different subtypes of lncRNAs were compared using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Each region of the box plot indicates the maximum, upper quartile, median, lower quartile and minimum from top to bottom.
Figure 4. Genomic features of the different subtypes of lncRNAs. (A)Transcript length, (B) expression level, (C) exon count and (D) ORF length of different subtypes of lncRNAs were compared using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Each region of the box plot indicates the maximum, upper quartile, median, lower quartile and minimum from top to bottom.
Cimb 45 00149 g004
Cimb 45 00149 g005 550
Figure 5. The secondary structures of 10 lncRNAs. (A) LNC_001595; (B) ALDBSSCT0000003048; (C) LNC_000191; (D) ALDBSSCT0000009442; (E) LNC_001065; (F) ALDBSSCT0000006918; (G) LNC_000263; (H) LNC_002009; (I) ALDBSSCT0000007366; (J) LNC_000042.
Figure 5. The secondary structures of 10 lncRNAs. (A) LNC_001595; (B) ALDBSSCT0000003048; (C) LNC_000191; (D) ALDBSSCT0000009442; (E) LNC_001065; (F) ALDBSSCT0000006918; (G) LNC_000263; (H) LNC_002009; (I) ALDBSSCT0000007366; (J) LNC_000042.
Cimb 45 00149 g005
Cimb 45 00149 g006 550
Figure 6. GO term analysis of the biological functions of the identified lncRNA target genes.
Figure 6. GO term analysis of the biological functions of the identified lncRNA target genes.
Cimb 45 00149 g006
Cimb 45 00149 g007 550
Figure 7. The top 20 KEGG pathways of lncRNA target genes. The x-axis indicates the gene ratio, and the y-axis indicates the name of the KEGG pathway. The size of the dot indicates the number of target genes, and the color of the dot indicates different p values.
Figure 7. The top 20 KEGG pathways of lncRNA target genes. The x-axis indicates the gene ratio, and the y-axis indicates the name of the KEGG pathway. The size of the dot indicates the number of target genes, and the color of the dot indicates different p values.
Cimb 45 00149 g007
Cimb 45 00149 g008 550
Figure 8. Validation of the reliability of RNA-Seq data and four gene expression levels. Data are presented as Mean ± SE with three duplicates. One-way ANOVA was performed to calculate statistical significance followed by Duncan’s test. Different asterisks above bars indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 8. Validation of the reliability of RNA-Seq data and four gene expression levels. Data are presented as Mean ± SE with three duplicates. One-way ANOVA was performed to calculate statistical significance followed by Duncan’s test. Different asterisks above bars indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Cimb 45 00149 g008
Cimb 45 00149 g009 550
Figure 9. Relative expression of LNC_001595 in different tissues. The results are shown as Mean ± SE with three duplicates. One-way ANOVA was conducted to calculate statistical significance followed by Duncan’s test. Different asterisks above bars indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 9. Relative expression of LNC_001595 in different tissues. The results are shown as Mean ± SE with three duplicates. One-way ANOVA was conducted to calculate statistical significance followed by Duncan’s test. Different asterisks above bars indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Cimb 45 00149 g009
Cimb 45 00149 g010 550
Figure 10. Cytokine gene expression levels (A) and concentrations (B) in the spleen. Data are displayed as Mean ± SE with three duplicates. One-way ANOVA was performed to calculate statistical significance followed by Duncan’s test. Different asterisks above bars indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 10. Cytokine gene expression levels (A) and concentrations (B) in the spleen. Data are displayed as Mean ± SE with three duplicates. One-way ANOVA was performed to calculate statistical significance followed by Duncan’s test. Different asterisks above bars indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Cimb 45 00149 g010
Cimb 45 00149 g011 550
Figure 11. A diagram illustrating the potential lncRNAs, target genes and cytokines.
Figure 11. A diagram illustrating the potential lncRNAs, target genes and cytokines.
Cimb 45 00149 g011
Table
Table 1. Detailed information of 14 DE lncRNAs between SR and SS groups compared to SC group.
Table 1. Detailed information of 14 DE lncRNAs between SR and SS groups compared to SC group.
Transcript_IdLengthGene_IdSRSSpQ
LNC_0015956577XLOC_0930691.360.670.00090.0196
ALDBSSCT0000003048519ALDBSSCG000000182618.275.330.00010.0023
LNC_0001912965XLOC_0115802.113.810.00300.0469
ALDBSSCT0000009442233ALDBSSCG000000575856.02171.520.00040.0114
LNC_0010652890XLOC_0642120.331.060.00280.0449
LNC_00198720,029XLOC_1188802.894.730.00100.0220
LNC_0000424774XLOC_0024511.000.450.00270.0438
ALDBSSCT00000069181302ALDBSSCG000000420814.2033.320.00010.0041
LNC_0010978758XLOC_0659962.211.130.00080.0181
LNC_000263280XLOC_01600112.3423.030.00010.0023
LNC_0020091490XLOC_1202253.137.560.00010.0041
ALDBSSCT0000007366504ALDBSSCG000000447127.9713.090.00020.0056
LNC_00125313,487XLOC_0747960.591.530.00010.0023
LNC_00198531,206XLOC_1186442.251.450.00300.0469
Table
Table 2. Target gene prediction of potential diarrheic resistance lncRNAs.
Table 2. Target gene prediction of potential diarrheic resistance lncRNAs.
LncRNA Transcript_IdTrans Target GenesCis Target Genes
ALDBSSCT0000003048 PIK3R4
LNC_000191GTPBP8
ALDBSSCT0000009442ADGRG3SPOCD1
LNC_001987ZNF648
ALDBSSCT0000006918FAM167B, IL17RD, GADD45G, LY6G5B, ZGRF1, IQCJ, LRFN5, DDR1, NCALD, IL17F, POU4F3, IL17RA, SLC2A13, CCDC110, LIN28A, DEFB123, MUSK, CD63, TTYH1, RXRB, RBFOX1, MCAT, GGT1, CA7, SYCN, MRC2, CALCRL, PDZD4, HIST1H2BA, MROH1, SPINK5, IL12A, PGPEP1L, PAG6, PNCK, ICAM2, MARCH3, ADAMTS4, SSMEM1, PLAC8L1, LCN8, HRASLS5, SLC39A14, ONECUT2
LNC_001097 TFEC
LNC_000263RPL8, SPO11, MAEL, BTG4, WEE2, NLRP9, OTX2, H1FOO, HAL, FKBP6, PAX6, FOXR1, TCL1A, BCL2L10, ZP4, HMGB2, NLRP11ZC3H7A
ALDBSSCT0000007366 RSAD2, RNF144A, CMPK2
LNC_001985 ZNF398, PDIA4, ZNF425, ZNF786
Note: the overstriking and italic letters represented as genes are related to infectious diseases, immune diseases and inflammation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, Z.; Wang, P.; Yang, Q.; Gao, X.; Gun, S.; Huang, X. Change in Long Non-Coding RNA Expression Profile Related to the Antagonistic Effect of Clostridium perfringens Type C on Piglet Spleen. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 2309-2325. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45030149

AMA Style

Yan Z, Wang P, Yang Q, Gao X, Gun S, Huang X. Change in Long Non-Coding RNA Expression Profile Related to the Antagonistic Effect of Clostridium perfringens Type C on Piglet Spleen. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2023; 45(3):2309-2325. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45030149

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Zunqiang, Pengfei Wang, Qiaoli Yang, Xiaoli Gao, Shuangbao Gun, and Xiaoyu Huang. 2023. "Change in Long Non-Coding RNA Expression Profile Related to the Antagonistic Effect of Clostridium perfringens Type C on Piglet Spleen" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 45, no. 3: 2309-2325. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45030149

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop