Next Article in Journal
The Neuroprotective Effects of Arecae Pericarpium against Glutamate-Induced HT22 Cell Cytotoxicity
Next Article in Special Issue
API-2-Induced Cell Migration Is Overcome by Small Molecular Approaches Inhibiting β-Catenin
Previous Article in Journal
Pathological Evidence for Residual SARS-CoV-2 in the Micrometastatic Niche of a Patient with Ovarian Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review on Advanced Cancer Modeling for a Cancer Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
CIMB
Volume 44
Issue 12
10.3390/cimb44120401
cimb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Somatic Mutations Alter Interleukin Signaling Pathways in Grade II Invasive Breast Cancer Patients: An Egyptian Experience

by
Auhood Nassar
1,*,
Abdel Rahman N. Zekri
1,*,
Mostafa H. Elberry
1,
Ahmed M. Lymona
2,
Mai M. Lotfy
1,
Mohamed Abouelhoda
3 and
Amira Salah El-Din Youssef
1
1
Cancer Biology Department, Virology and Immunology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11796, Egypt
2
Surgical Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11796, Egypt
3
Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo 12613, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(12), 5890-5901; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120401
Submission received: 21 July 2022 / Revised: 30 September 2022 / Accepted: 11 October 2022 / Published: 26 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Molecular Pathogenesis Regulation in Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to investigate the impact of somatic mutations on various interleukin signaling pathways associated with grade II invasive breast cancer (BC) in Egyptian patients to broaden our understanding of their role in promoting carcinogenesis. Fifty-five grade II invasive BC patients were included in this study. Data for somatic mutations in 45 BC patients were already available from a previous study. Data for somatic mutations of 10 new BC patients were included in the current study. Somatic mutations were identified using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to study their involvement in interleukin signaling pathways. For pathway analysis, we used ingenuity variant analysis (IVA) to identify the most significantly altered pathways. We identified somatic mutations in components of the interleukin-2, interleukin-6, and inter-leukin-7 signaling pathways, including mutations in JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, SOCS1, IL7R, MCL1, BCL2, MTOR, and IL6ST genes. Interestingly, six mutations which were likely to be novel deleterious were identified: two in the SCH1 gene, two in the IL2 gene, and one in each of the IL7R and JUN genes. According to IVA analysis, interleukin 2, interleukin 6, and interleukin 7 signaling pathways were the most altered in 34.5%, 29%, and 23.6% of our BC group, respectively. Our multigene panel sequencing analysis reveals that our BC patients have altered interleukin signaling pathways. So, these results highlight the prominent role of interleukins in the carcinogenesis process and suggest its potential role as promising candidates for personalized therapy in Egyptian patients.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common and first cause of cancer death among women [1]. In 2020, WHO reported 2.3 million women diagnosed with BC and 680,000 deaths worldwide [2]. In Egypt, it accounts for 33% of female cancers, and more than 22,000 new cases are diagnosed yearly [3]. There is a tight interplay between the immune system and the malignant cells. The resistance to the ability of the immune system to eliminate transformed cells and the presence of protumoral inflammation are two major contributing hallmarks of cancer [4]. In recent decades, chronic inflammation has been well established to have a critical role in tumor development and progression. It has proved to be one of the drivers of carcinogenesis in many cancers. Several studies have highlighted the key role of cytokines, especially interleukins (ILs), in BC initiation, migration, and progression through IL signaling in cancer cells [5,6]. A recent review by Manore et al. revealed that IL-6 is frequently activated in BC and simultaneously suppress the anti-tumor immune response. Moreover, it highlighted that multiple IL-6 pathway components are promising therapeutic targets [7]. Another study showed that aberrant expression of IL-7 and its signaling intermediates in invasive BC could provide diagnostic and prognostic implications. In addition, measuring these molecules in breast tissues may provide molecular indicators of nodal status, tumor differentiation and aggressiveness [8]. In addition, other interleukins are well known to have function in BC occurrence as well as progression, such as: IL-1, IL-8, IL-11, and IL-12. It is well established that IL-1 levels are elevated in primary tumors or serum of BC patients. Additionally, it correlates with the aggressiveness of the disease phenotypes such as advanced stage, basal subtype, or metastasis [9]. On the other hand, numerous correlations between IL-8 expression in BC tumor cells and IL-8 plasma levels, and bone metastatic potential were observed [10,11]. Moreover, IL-8 is highly expressed in ER negative BC and HER2 positive BC, but it increases invasiveness and metastatic potential of both ER negative and ER positive BC cells [12]. Additionally, Johnstone et al. reported the correlation of IL-11 expression in BC tissue with a high histological grade along with poor patient survival [13]. Parallel and massive next-generation sequencing (NGS) markedly advanced our understanding of the genomic profiles of tumors [14]. Recently, NGS has allowed us to understand the genetically altered pathways involved in cancer development and progression. In addition, using NGS to identify specific germline or somatic mutations has been proven to have predictive and prognostic values [15]. We previously conducted targeted DNA sequencing to know how Egyptian patients differ from other populations in terms of somatic mutations. So, we developed a cohort study to explore the landscape of somatic mutations in Egyptian BC patients and identify the most frequently detected somatic mutations [16]. In another study on 58 BC patients, we identified all the somatic, non-silent, base substitution, and indel mutations per megabase of the examined genome to calculate the tumor mutation burden (TMB) and established an Egyptian TMB prediction model based on the expression level of ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki-67 [17]. In the present study, we used Ion AmpliSeq Comprehensive Cancer Panel-targeted sequencing to study the involvement of somatic mutations in interleukin signaling pathways associated with grade II invasive BC Egyptian patients to broaden our understanding of their role in promoting carcinogenesis and developing personalized therapy in Egypt.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Samples

Fresh tissue samples were recruited from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of Egypt from November 2019 to November 2020. Fifty-five grade II invasive BC patients were included in this study. Data for somatic mutations in 45 BC patients were already available from a previous study [17]. In addition, the study included data for ten new BC patients’ somatic mutations. Our study included female patients of any age with grade II invasive BC, and tumor size less than 5 cm (T1–T2). Patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. The collected tissues were stored in MACS Tissue Storage Solution at −80 in the freezer till DNA extraction. Each patient enrolled in this study signed a written informed consent form. The clinicopathological features of the enrolled patients were collected from the clinical records at NCI, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

2.2. DNA Extraction, Library Preparation, and Data Processing

Genomic DNA was isolated, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, from fresh tissue using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Cat. No. 51304, Qiagen, Hilden, NRW, Germany). The isolated DNA was measured using Qubit® 3.0 Fluorometer (Cat. No. Q33216, Thermofischer Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA, USA) with Qubit™ dsDNA HS assay kit (Cat. No. Q32854, Thermofischer Scientific Inc, USA). Then, the amplicon libraries were prepared using Ion Ampliseq Complete Cancer Panel (CCP) and Ion AmpliSeq™ Library Kit Plus (Cat. No. 4488990, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The CCP has 16,000 primer pairs for 409 genes (Table S1), covering 15,749 mutations. Libraries QCs were evaluated using QIAxcel (Cat No. 900194 Qiagen, Hilden, NRW, Germany). QPCR of the libraries was performed using the Ion Library Quantitation Kit (Cat. No. 4468802, Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). Ion Proton Sequencing 200 Kit v2 (Cat. No. 4485149, Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA) was utilized for next-generation sequencing on the Ion Proton Platform. Sequencing data were primarily analyzed using the Torrent Suite as recommended by the manufacturer. The low-quality reads <Q20 and the bases with low base quality were trimmed out. A run was accepted only if the total number of aligned reads covered at least 95% of the target regions and the depth of coverage for the variants was larger than 100×.

2.3. Identification and Classification of the Somatic Variants in Our Study

Firstly, we filtered the somatic mutations according to our normal Egyptian population database. Then, we used the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) in the identification and classification of the somatic variants. Then, we used ANNOVAR package to annotate the somatic variants. All genetic annotations and nomenclature were based on GRCh37/hg19 build. Frameshift deletions/ insertions, and in-frame deletions/insertions were considered to be pathogenic. For missense mutations, we used amino acid prediction software, SIFT [18], PolyPhen-2 [19], and CADD Phred score [20], to predict their deleteriousness. A variant was considered “damaging” when any prediction program predicted it as “damaging”. According to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommendations, the variants were classified into the following: pathogenic variant (PV), likely pathogenic variant (LPV), variants of uncertain significance (VUS), likely benign (LB), and benign (B) [21]. The novel variants predicated to be deleterious were submitted to the ClinVar submission portal in order to obtain accession numbers for the variants (Submission ID: SUB11788117 & Organization ID: 507536; Genomic Center, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt).

2.4. Pathway Analysis by Ingenuity Variant Analysis (IVA)

For pathway analysis, we used ingenuity variant analysis (IVA; QIAGEN, Germany) to identify the significantly altered interleukin signaling pathways. The Ingenuity Knowledge Base was used to link variants in an analyzed dataset to biologically relevant information. Based on the applied filter, the pathogenic variants and the most affected pathways could be identified.

3. Results

3.1. Clinicopathological Characteristics of the Studied Sample Set

The clinical characteristics of the studied patients are summarized in Table 1. Patients were aged from 32 to 73 years old. According to the menopausal status, there were only 8 premenopausal patients (14.5%) and 47 postmenopausal patients (85.5%). Regarding hormonal status, 67.3% and 65.4% were positive for estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR), respectively. However, only 21.8% of the patients were positive for HER-2, and 65.4 % tested positive for KI-67 ≥ 14%.

3.2. Somatic Mutations Involved in Interleukin Signaling Pathways

Without departing from the scope of this study, we reported the somatic mutations involved in the significantly altered interleukin signaling pathways. Table 2 lists the identified somatic mutations involved in interleukin signaling pathways. We identified 21 mutations in components of the interleukin-2, interleukin-6, and interleukin-7 signaling pathways, including somatic mutations in JAK1, JAK2, SOCS1, IL7R, MCL1, BCL2, MTOR, and IL6ST genes. Interestingly we identified 18 out of 21 variants that were not previously reported in BC tissue. We identified four loss-of-function mutations in the JAK1 gene in 13 (23.6%), 8 (14.5%), 5 (9%), and 3 (5.4%) patients, respectively. This gene harbored four different mutations in 29 patients, representing 52.7%. The BCL2 gene harbored two different deletions in 8 patients (16.4%). The MCL1 gene harbored three different mutations in 11 (20%), one (1.8%), and one (1.8%) patients, respectively. In addition, two different mutations were identified in the SOCS gene and IL7R gene in 15 (27.3%) and 10 (18.2%) patients, respectively. One loss function mutation was identified in each of the JAK2 gene, IL6ST gene, and MTOR gene.

3.3. The Identified Likely Novel Mutations of Somatic Allele Origin

Interestingly, two likely novel mutations predicted to be deleterious were identified in the SCH1 gene (p.K11fs*18 and p.F17fs*12); each has been identified in two samples. Two more likely novel mutations were identified in the IL-2 gene (p.C145fs*8 in 10 patients and p.L45* in 3 patients). In addition, one likely novel mutation was identified in each of the IL-7R gene (p.K157fs*4) and JUN gene (p.P220fs*6), as listed in Table 3. The raw data for the identified somatic mutations in our study are illustrated in Table S2.

3.4. The Most Commonly Altered Pathways

Pathway analysis was performed using ingenuity variant analysis (IVA, QIAGEN, Germany). Pathway Analysis reported the altered interleukin signaling pathways with its involved mutated genes. The most altered interleukin signaling pathways were IL-2 (p = 0.0021) (Figure 1), IL-6 (p-value = 0.0025) (Figure 2), and IL-7 (p-value =0.0012) (Figure 3), signaling pathways that are altered in 34.5%, 29%, and 23.6% of patients, respectively.

4. Discussion

Cancers, including BC, are multifactorial diseases in which genetic and epigenetic changes significantly impact tumorigenesis, progression, and treatment response [22]. These alterations in normal cells lead to dysregulation in many signaling pathways, including interleukin signaling pathways. Interleukins serve as a means of communication between immune and non-immune cells and tissues [23]. Therefore, interleukins are essential in cancer development and progression by nurturing an environment that promotes cancer growth [24]. Understanding different pathways that underlie BC development and progression is critical to identifying new targeted therapeutic agents and is relevant to the disease diagnosis and prognosis [25]. In the present study, somatic mutations involved in various interleukin signaling pathways were identified in fifty-five Egyptian grade II invasive BC patients. Our results showed that all patients have at least one somatic mutation in ILs-signaling pathways. According to Ingenuity Variant/Pathway Analysis, the most altered interleukin signaling pathways in our study were interleukin-2, interleukin-6, interleukin-7, and interleukin-15 signaling pathways.
IL-2 is a key regulator of normal immune functions and is critical for the activation and subsequent amplification of the immune response following antigenic stimulation [26]. IL-2 binds with high affinity to the trimeric IL-2 receptor (IL-2R), consisting of three chains (IL-2Rα, β, and γ). IL-2R uses Janus family kinase (JAK) members to induce signal transduction [27,28]. The IL-2Rβ chain binds to JAK1, and the IL-3Rγ binds to JAK3, which will result in JAK1/3 activation and activate the IL-2-mediated proliferative responses [29]. We identified loss of function mutations in JAK1 and gain of function mutations in JAK3 genes and hypothesized that it resulted in constitutive activation of their kinase activity. From here comes the importance of using next-generation sequencing techniques to identify the mutations likely to lead to constitutive activation of kinases. Such mutations are known to be a driving event in cancer, and their identification is of great importance as it might help identify their selective kinase inhibitors. Consequently, we claim that JAK1 and/or JAK3 selective kinase inhibitors can be used to block IL-2-mediated proliferative responses [30,31].
Moreover, we identified loss of function mutations in the SHC gene, the key pathway for IL-2 control of Ras/Raf/MEK/REK pathway. Tyrosine-phosphorylated SHC forms a complex with the SH2 domain of the adapter GRB2. This complex then binds to Ras guanine nucleotide exchange protein SOS (Son of Sevenless) and activates the Raf-ERK MAP kinase cascade [32]. The referred loss of function mutations are novel and are reported in our study for the first time.
IL-2 can also regulate the activation of the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway [33,34] through the recruitment of the regulatory subunit of PI3K (p85 subunit) into the IL-2Rβ signaling complex [35]. Interestingly, the recruitment of this regulatory subunit to the receptor is mediated by JAK1 through a non-phosphotyrosine interaction between it and IL-2Rβ [36]. Therefore, mutations in the JAK1 gene might explain why the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway is upregulated in our studied cases.
Several studies suggested the relationship between inflammation and various cancer types and showed that anti-inflammatory agents could attenuate tumor growth. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine released by cancerous cells in the tumor microenvironment and plays a vital role in the differentiation and expansion of tumor cells [37,38]. The increased and dysregulated activities of IL-6 can be found in cancer. Additionally, the mutations in the gene-encoding proteins involved in the IL6-activated intracellular signaling cascades make these proteins constitutively active, resulting in hyperactivation of these signaling pathways. Thus, these mutations are interesting targets for IL6-signaling targeted cancer therapy, which aims to block the activation of pathways downstream of IL-6 and reduce the proliferation and survival of cancer cells [39].
IL-6 leads to the activation of three major downstream pathways due to the dimerization of gp130/IL6ST: the JAK/STAT pathway, the MAPK/MERK/ERK signaling cascade, and the PI3K/AKT pathway. The tyrosine kinases in the JAK family that are associated with the cytoplasmic region of gp130/IL6ST by a non-covalent bond, initiate the signaling cascade. The dimerization of gp130/IL6ST causes auto-phosphorylation and activation of JAK. In turn, JAK activates the SH2 domain-containing cytoplasmic protein tyrosine phosphatase (SHP2), which activates the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway, responsible for different transcription factors linked to cell growth [40,41]. Moreover, JAK can also activate the PI3K/AKT pathway. The activation of these three main signaling pathways leads to tumor-promoting cytokines’ effect on both cancer cell-intrinsic processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, survival, invasion, and metastasis, and cancer cell-extrinsic processes, such as modulation of inflammation and angiogenesis and the effect on the tumor microenvironment (TME) [42,43]. Here, in our study, we identified somatic mutations in genes controlling the IL-6 signaling pathway, loss of function mutations in IL-6 signal transducer (IL6ST; gp130), loss of function mutations in JAK1, gain of function mutation in JAK3, and loss of function mutation in SOCS1. Thus, we hypothesized that JAK1 mutations lead to a partial loss of its kinase activity. On the other hand, all the previously mentioned mutations promote the constitutive activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway and Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway. We also identified mutations in the SOCS1 gene, the negative feedback gene of these signaling pathways.
IL-6 is mainly secreted in the tumor cells and tumor associated fibroblast and many studies have reported its immunopathogenicity and its signaling in tumor growth, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance in BC. However, herein, we shed light on IL-6 function in grade II invasive BC patients. Therefore, targeting IL-6 and/or its receptor in combination with other potent anticancer therapies may be a potent therapeutic approach for BC therapy [44,45,46].
IL-7/IL-7R signaling activates two main signal transduction pathways (the JAK/STAT and PI3K/Akt pathway). The first mandatory step in IL-7/IL-7R signaling is the phosphorylation of JAK1 and JAK3 kinases, which will result in constitutive activation of proteins regulating cell cycle progression, survival, and protein translation [47]. Additionally, IL-7 stimulation will induce the JAK-mediated activation of STAT5, facilitating its nuclear translocation and regulation of gene expression [48]. Herein, we claimed that mutations in IL7R, JAK1, and JAK3 would result in constitutive activation of the IL7R-JAK-STAT signaling pathway. In addition, we hypothesized that loss-of-function mutations in CCND1 and SOCS1 genes cause deregulation of expression of antiapoptotic (Bcl-2 and Mcl-1) and proapoptotic (Bad and Bax) proteins.
These findings shed light on the alteration of IL-signaling pathways in our BC patients. These results were in agreement with our previous published study in Egyptian colorectal cancer patients that reported the alteration of the interleukin pathways in those patients [49], suggesting that Egyptian patients are likely to be prone to these alterations. Therefore, these data highlight the prominent role of ILs as promising candidates for targeted therapy in Egyptian patients.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our findings support the role of somatic mutations in IL-signaling pathways in breast oncogenesis in Egyptian patients with grade II BC.
Using multigene panel sequencing analysis, we were able to identify somatic mutations in IL-signaling pathways including JAK1, JAK2, SOCS1, IL7R, MCL1, BCL2, MTOR, and IL6ST genes. Six mutations are likely to be novel and deleterious. In addition to the diagnostic benefit of detecting such IL-pathways alterations, this work would also assist in the development of personalized treatment regimens suited to Egyptian breast cancer patients. Further research is recommended to validate these identified somatic mutations in larger series of patients and to confirm their impact at the protein level.

6. Recommendation

We recommend following up the response to treatment of those patients to investigate the better described therapy regimens that are suitable for the identified mutations in this study.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb44120401/s1, Table S1: The Comprehensive Cancer Panel (CCP) gene list, Table S2: The raw data for the identified somatic mutations in our study.

Author Contributions

A.R.N.Z. (dead) and A.N.: conceptualization; A.N., M.H.E., M.M.L. and A.S.E.-D.Y.: methodology and software; A.M.L.: resources; A.N., A.R.N.Z. and A.S.E.-D.Y.: investigation and validation; A.N., A.R.N.Z. and M.A.: data curation and formal analysis; A.R.N.Z.: supervision and funding acquisition; A.N.: writing—original draft; M.H.E. and A.S.E.-D.Y.: review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The current study is funded by the Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF), Project ID: 41907.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was accepted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB number: IRB00004025; approval number: 2010014038.3) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University, Egypt. The study was guided according to the ICH-GCP guidelines and a written informed consent was received from each patient enrolled in the study.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated during this study are included in this article while, its Supplementary Information files are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the enrolled patients from the NCI for the fresh tissues provided for research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors do not have any competing interests.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. WHO. Breast Cancer Fact Sheet. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer (accessed on 7 July 2022).
  3. Ibrahim, A.S.; Khaled, H.M.; Mikhail, N.N.; Baraka, H.; Kamel, H. Cancer Incidence in Egypt: Results of the National Population-Based Cancer Registry Program. J. Cancer Epidemiol. 2014, 2014, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Balkwill, F.; Mantovani, A. Inflammation and cancer: Back to Virchow? Lancet 2001, 357, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bruni, D.; Angell, H.K.; Galon, J. The immune contexture and Immunoscore in cancer prognosis and therapeutic efficacy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2020, 20, 662–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Manore, S.G.; Doheny, D.L.; Wong, G.L.; Lo, H.W. IL-6/JAK/STAT3 Signaling in Breast Cancer Metastasis: Biology and Treatment. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 866014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Al-Rawi, M.A.; Rmali, K.; Watkins, G.; Mansel, R.E.; Jiang, W.G. Aberrant expression of interleukin-7 (IL-7) and its signalling complex in human breast cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 2004, 40, 494–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vilsmaier, T.; Rack, B.; König, A.; Friese, K.; Janni, W.; Jeschke, U.; Acher, T.W. Influence of Circulating Tumour Cells on Production of IL-1α, IL-1β and IL-12 in Sera of Patients with Primary Diagnosis of Breast Cancer before Treatment. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 5227–5236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kinder, M.; Chislock, E.; Bussard, K.M.; Shuman, L.; Mastro, A.M. Metastatic breast cancer induces an osteoblast inflammatory response. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kamalakar, A.; Bendre, M.S.; Washam, C.L.; Fowler, T.W.; Carver, A.; Dilley, J.D.; Bracey, J.W.; Akel, N.S.; Margulies, A.G.; Skinner, R.A.; et al. Circulating interleukin-8 levels explain breast cancer osteolysis in mice and humans. Bone 2014, 61, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Todorović-Raković, N.; Milovanović, J. Interleukin-8 in breast cancer progression. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2013, 33, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Johnstone, C.N.; Chand, A.; Putoczki, T.L.; Ernst, M. Emerging roles for IL-11 signaling in cancer development and progression: Focus on breast cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2015, 26, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lang, G.-T.; Jiang, Y.-Z.; Shi, J.-X.; Yang, F.; Li, X.-G.; Pei, Y.-C.; Shao, Z.M. Characterization of the genomic landscape and actionable mutations in Chinese breast cancers by clinical sequencing. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fachal, L.; Aschard, H.; Beesley, J.; Barnes, D.R.; Allen, J.; Kar, S.; Jacubowksa, A. Fine-mapping of 150 breast cancer risk regions identifies 191 likely target genes. Nat. Genet. 2020, 52, 56–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nassar, A.; Abouelhoda, M.; Mansour, O.; Loutfy, S.A.; Hafez, M.M.; Gomaa, M.; Bahnassy, A.; Youssef, A.S.E.-D.; Lotfy, M.M.; Ismail, H.; et al. Targeted next generation sequencing identifies somatic mutations in a cohort of Egyptian breast cancer patients. JAR 2020, 24, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nassar, A.; Lymona, A.; Lotfy, M.; Youssef, A.; Mohanad, M.; Manie, T.; Youssef, M.M.G.; Farahat, I.G.; Zekri, A.-R.N. Tumor Mutation Burden Prediction Model in Egyptian Breast Cancer patients based on Next Generation Sequencing. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2021, 22, 2053–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kumar, P.; Henikoff, S.; Ng, P.C. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Landrum, M.J.; Lee, J.M.; Benson, M.; Brown, G.R.; Chao, C.; Chitipiralla, S.; Gu, B.; Hart, J.; Hoffman, D.; Jang, W.; et al. ClinVar: Improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D1062–D1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Rentzsch, P.; Witten, D.; Cooper, G.M.; Shendure, J.; Kircher, M. CADD: Predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D886–D894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Feng, Y.; Spezia, M.; Huang, S.; Yuan, C.; Zeng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Ji, X.; Liu, W.; Huang, B.; Luo, W.; et al. Breast cancer development and progression: Risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis. Genes Dis. 2018, 5, 77–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, X.; Dai, W.; Li, C. Interleukins in the treatment of melanoma. Chin. Med. J. 2022, 135, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Briukhovetska, D.; Dörr, J.; Endres, S.; Libby, P.; Dinarello, C.A.; Kobold, S. Interleukins in cancer: From biology to therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2021, 21, 481–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Song, D.; Cui, M.; Zhao, G.; Fan, Z.; Nolan, K.; Yang, Y.; Lee, P.; Ye, F.; Zhang, D.Y. Pathway-based analysis of breast cancer. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2014, 6, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Valle-Mendiola, A.; Gutiérrez-Hoya, A.; Lagunas-Cruz, M.d.C.; Weiss-Steider, B.; Soto-Cruz, I. Pleiotropic Effects of IL-2 on Cancer: Its Role in Cervical Cancer. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Johnston, J.A.; Kawamura, M.; Kirken, R.A.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Blake, T.B.; Shibuya, K.; Ortaldo, J.R.; McVicar, D.W.; O’Shea, J.J. Phosphorylation and activation of the Jak-3 Janus kinase in response to interleukin-2. Nature 1994, 370, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Suzuki, K.; Nakajima, H.; Saito, Y.; Saito, T.; Leonard, W.J.; Iwamoto, I. Janus kinase 3 (Jak3) is essential for common cytokine receptor γ chain (γc)-dependent signaling: Comparative analysis of γc, Jak3, and γc and Jak3 double-deficient mice. Int. Immunol. 2000, 12, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Miyazaki, T.; Kawahara, A.; Fujii, H.; Nakagawa, Y.; Minami, Y.; Liu, Z.-J.; Oishi, I.; Silvennoinen, O.; Witthuhn, B.A.; Ihle, J.N.; et al. Functional Activation of Jak1 and Jak3 by Selective Association with IL-2 Receptor Subunits. Science 1994, 266, 1045–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. O’Shea, J.J.; Kontzias, A.; Yamaoka, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Laurence, A. Janus kinase inhibitors in autoimmune diseases. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, ii111–ii115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. O’Shea, J.J.; Schwartz, D.M.; Villarino, A.V.; Gadina, M.; McInnes, I.B.; Laurence, A. The JAK-STAT Pathway: Impact on Human Disease and Therapeutic Intervention. Annu. Rev. Med. 2015, 66, 311–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reif, K.; Buday, L.; Downward, J.; Cantrell, D.A. SH3 domains of the adapter molecule Grb2 complex with two proteins in T cells: The guanine nucleotide exchange protein Sos and a 75-kDa protein that is a substrate for T cell antigen receptor-activated tyrosine kinases. Genes Dis. 1994, 269, 14081–14087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Reif, K.; Burgering, B.M.T.; Cantrell, D.A. Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Links the Interleukin-2 Receptor to Protein Kinase B and p70 S6 Kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 14426–14433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ward, S.G.; Cantrell, D.A. Phosphoinositide 3-kinases in T lymphocyte activation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2001, 13, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gu, H.; Maeda, H.; Moon, J.J.; Lord, J.D.; Yoakim, M.; Nelson, B.H.; Neel, B.G. New Role for Shc in Activation of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2000, 20, 7109–7120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Migone, T.-S.; Rodig, S.; Cacalano, N.A.; Berg, M.; Schreiber, R.D.; Leonard, W.J. Functional Cooperation of the Interleukin-2 Receptor β Chain and Jak1 in Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Recruitment and Phosphorylation. Mol. Cell Biol. 1998, 18, 6416–6422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Bromberg, J.; Wang, T.C. Inflammation and Cancer: IL-6 and STAT3 Complete the Link. Cancer Cell 2009, 15, 79–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hosseini, F.; Hassannia, H.; Mahdian-Shakib, A.; Jadidi-Niaragh, F.; Enderami, S.E.; Fattahi, M.; Anissian, A.; Mirshafiey, A.; Kokhaei, P. Targeting of crosstalk between tumor and tumor microenvironment by β-D mannuronic acid (M2000) in murine breast cancer model. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lokau, J.; Garbers, C. Activating mutations of the gp130/JAK/STAT pathway in human diseases. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2019, 16, 283–309. [Google Scholar]
  40. Heinrich, P.C.; Behrmann, I.; Haan, S.; Hermanns, H.M.; Müller-Newen, G.; Schaper, F. Principles of interleukin (IL)-6-type cytokine signalling and its regulation. Biochem. J. 2003, 374, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bousoik, E.; Aliabadi, H.M. “Do We Know Jack” About JAK? A Closer Look at JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Johnston, P.A.; Grandis, J.R. STAT3 SIGNALING: Anticancer Strategies and Challenges. Mol. Interv. 2011, 11, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Schaper, F.; Rose-John, S. Interleukin-6: Biology, signaling and strategies of blockade. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2015, 26, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Masjedi, A.; Hashemi, V.; Hojjat-Farsangi, M.; Ghalamfarsa, G.; Azizi, G.; Yousefi, M.; Jadidi-Niaragh, F. The significant role of interleukin-6 and its signaling pathway in the immunopathogenesis and treatment of breast cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 1415–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Motallebnezhad, M.; Jadidi-Niaragh, F.; Qamsari, E.S.; Bagheri, S.; Gharibi, T.; Yousefi, M. The immunobiology of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer. Tumor Biol. 2015, 37, 1387–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Erez, N.; Glanz, S.; Raz, Y.; Avivi, C.; Barshack, I. Cancer Associated Fibroblasts express pro-inflammatory factors in human breast and ovarian tumors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 437, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Degryse, S.; de Bock, C.E.; Demeyer, S.; Govaerts, I.; Bornschein, S.; Verbeke, D.; Jacobs, K.; Binos, S.; Skerrett-Byrne, D.A.; Murray, H.C.; et al. Mutant JAK3 phosphoproteomic profiling predicts synergism between JAK3 inhibitors and MEK/BCL2 inhibitors for the treatment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2018, 32, 788–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Pike, K.A.; Hatzihristidis, T.; Bussières-Marmen, S.; Robert, F.; Desai, N.; Miranda-Saavedra, D.; Pelletier, J.; Tremblay, M.L. TC-PTP regulates the IL-7 transcriptional response during murine early T cell development. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Youssef, A.S.E.-D.; Abdel-Fattah, M.A.; Lotfy, M.M.; Nassar, A.; Abouelhoda, M.; Touny, A.O.; Hassan, Z.K.; Eldin, M.M.; Bahnassy, A.A.; Khaled, H.; et al. Multigene Panel Sequencing Reveals Cancer-Specific and Common Somatic Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Patients: An Egyptian Experience. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 1332–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cimb 44 00401 g001 550
Figure 1. IL-2 signaling pathway identified using ingenuity variant analysis (IVA). Blue represents loss of function, and orange represents gain of function.
Figure 1. IL-2 signaling pathway identified using ingenuity variant analysis (IVA). Blue represents loss of function, and orange represents gain of function.
Cimb 44 00401 g001
Cimb 44 00401 g002 550
Figure 2. IL-6 signaling pathway identified using ingenuity variant analysis (IVA). Blue represents loss of function, and orange represents gain of function.
Figure 2. IL-6 signaling pathway identified using ingenuity variant analysis (IVA). Blue represents loss of function, and orange represents gain of function.
Cimb 44 00401 g002
Cimb 44 00401 g003 550
Figure 3. IL-7 signaling pathway identified using ingenuity variant analysis (IVA). Blue represents loss of function, and orange represents gain of function.
Figure 3. IL-7 signaling pathway identified using ingenuity variant analysis (IVA). Blue represents loss of function, and orange represents gain of function.
Cimb 44 00401 g003
Table
Table 1. Clinicopathological characteristics of the BC patients.
Table 1. Clinicopathological characteristics of the BC patients.
Patients CharacteristicsTotal (n = 55)Percentage (%)
Age: Median (Range)52.6 (32–73)
<501832.7
≥503767.3
Menopausal status
Premenopausal814.5
Postmenopausal4785.5
Lymph Node involvement
01221.8
1 to 32240
>32138.2
Estrogen (ER)
Negative1832.7
Positive3767.3
Progesterone (PR)
Negative1934.5
Positive3665.4
HER-2
Negative4378.2
Positive1221.8
Ki-67
<14%1934.5
≥14%3665.4
Table
Table 2. Somatic mutations identified in our multigene panel screening.
Table 2. Somatic mutations identified in our multigene panel screening.
GenePositionCosmic IDTypeIVA ClassificationInferred ActivitySIFT/or
PolyPhen-2 Prediction		CADD
Phred
Score		Affected TranscriptHGVS.cHGVS.pCases (n = 55)Occurrence in Cosmic Database
AKT3Chr1:243675627COSM7264038 *DeletionPVLoss-32NM_001370074.1c.1353delAp.K451fs*?9 (16.3%)Large intestine = 1
AKT3Chr1:243708813COSM8568034 *DeletionPVLoss--NM_001370074.1c.1250delp.K417Sfs*103 (5.4%)Stomach = 1
BCL2Chr18:60985665COSM7343104 *DeletionPVLoss--NM_000633.2c.234_235delp.G79Rfs*731 (1.8%)Large intestine = 1
BCL2Chr18:60985776COSM9113142 *DeletionPVLoss--NM_000633.2c.124delGp.A42fs*547 (12.7%)Large intestine = 1
IL6STChr5:55247869COSM269367 *DeletionPVLoss-32NM_175767.3c.1587delAp.V530*14 (25.4%)Large intestine = 12 and Stomach = 1
IL7RChr5:35867541COSM2687237 *DeletionPVLoss-20.2NM_002185.5c.361delAp.I121*7 (12.7%)Large intestine = 7 and Stomach = 4
IL7RChr5:35873646COSM7342389 *SNVPVLossDamaging25.3NM_002185.5c.602A > Gp.Y201C3 (5.4%)Large intestine = 1 and Thyroid = 1
JAK1Chr1:65325833COSM1560531DeletionPVLoss-33NM_001321853.2c.1289delCp.P386fs*213 (23.6%)Large intestine = 8 and Breast = 3
JAK1Chr1:65330630COSM1343915 *DeletionPVLoss-27.9NM_001321853.2c.884delAp.N339fs*38 (14.5%)Endometrium = 2 and Large intestine = 1
JAK1Chr1:65339129COSM6912578 *DeletionPVLoss-32NM_001321853.2c.407delAp.N136fs*325 (9%)Prostate = 2
JAK1Chr1:65339111COSM1639943DeletionPVLoss-25.6NM_001321853.2c.425delAp.K142fs*263 (5.4%)Breast = 4 and Large intestine = 2
JAK2Chr9:5078342COSM7286153 *DeletionPVLoss-33NM_001322199.1c.1586delAp.N678fs*5310 (18%)Large intestine = 1
JAK3Chr19:17954215COSM34216 *SNVPVGainPossibly damaging19.01NM_000215.4c.394C>Ap.P132T3 (5.4%)Lung = 1 and Hematopoietic and lymphoid = 1
MCL1Chr1:150551952COSM5156964 *DeletionPVLoss-22.7NM_001197320.1c.55delGp.A19fs*3011 (20%)Upper aerodigestive tract = 1
MCL1Chr1:150551935COSM5734360 *DeletionPVLoss-15.72NM_001197320.1c.61_72delTTGGGGGCCGGCp.L21_G24del1 (1.8%)Large intestine = 1 and Stomach = 1
MCL1Chr1:150551327COSM6923093 *SNVNVLossTolerated22.8NM_001197320.1c.680C>Tp.A227V1 (1.8%)Thyroid = 1 and Hematopoietic and lymphoid = 1
MTORChr1:11199444COSM6716875 *SNVPVLossDamaging32NM_004958.4c.5047C>Tp.R1683W1 (1.8%)Large intestine = 1
NRASChr1:115252309COSM7177458 *SNVPVLossPossibly Damaging23.4NM_002524.5c.331A>Gp.M111V1 (1.8%)Urinary tract = 1 and Stomach = 1
PIK3CAChr3:178936082COSM29329SNVPVLossDamaging31NM_006218.4c.1624G>Ap.E542K11 (20%)Breast = 239 and Large intestine = 66
SOCS1Chr16:11348846COSM19320 *DeletionPVLoss-24.3NM_003745.1c.490delGp.A164fs*4110 (18%)Hematopoietic and lymphoid = 3 and Large intestine = 1
SOCS1Chr16:11348998COSM6964419 *DeletionPVLoss-32NM_003745.1c.338delTp.F113fs*55 (9%)Large intestine = 1
HGVS.c: Human Genome Variation Society, Coding DNA sequence; HGVS.p: Human Genome Variation Society, protein sequence; Chr.: Chromosome.; BC: breast cancer. Variants were classified for their pathogenicity according to ClinVar and FATHMM (#) predictions; PV: pathogenic variants; NV: neutral variant. (*) indicates variants appeared in other tissue rather than BC.
Table
Table 3. Novel mutations identified in our multigene panel screening.
Table 3. Novel mutations identified in our multigene panel screening.
GenePositionCosmic IDAccession No.TypeIVA ClassificationInferred ActivityAffected TranscriptHGVS.cHGVS.pCases (n = 55)
SHC1Chr1:154947252NovelSCV002574988DeletionPVLossNM_001130041.2c.33delAp.K11fs*182 (3.6%)
SHC1Chr1:154947270NovelSCV002574989DeletionPVLossNM_001130041.2c.51delTp.F17fs*122 (3.6%)
IL2Chr4:123372936NovelSCV002574990DeletionPVLossNM_000586.4c.433delTp.C145fs*810 (18%)
IL2Chr4:123377462NovelSCV002574991DeletionPVLossNM_000586.4c.134delTp.L45*3 (5.3%)
IL7RChr5:35871245NovelSCV002574992DeletionPVLossNM_002185.5c.470delAp.K157fs*45 (9%)
JUNChr1:59248084NovelSCV002574993DeletionPVLossNM_002228.4c.659delCp.P220fs*67 (12.7%)
HGVS.c: Human Genome Variation Society, Coding DNA sequence; HGVS.p: Human Genome Variation Society, protein sequence; Chr.: chromosome.; BC: breast cancer. Variants were classified for their pathogenicity according to ClinVar and FATHMM (#) predictions; PV: pathogenic variants.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nassar, A.; Zekri, A.R.N.; Elberry, M.H.; Lymona, A.M.; Lotfy, M.M.; Abouelhoda, M.; Youssef, A.S.E.-D. Somatic Mutations Alter Interleukin Signaling Pathways in Grade II Invasive Breast Cancer Patients: An Egyptian Experience. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 5890-5901. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120401

AMA Style

Nassar A, Zekri ARN, Elberry MH, Lymona AM, Lotfy MM, Abouelhoda M, Youssef ASE-D. Somatic Mutations Alter Interleukin Signaling Pathways in Grade II Invasive Breast Cancer Patients: An Egyptian Experience. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2022; 44(12):5890-5901. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120401

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nassar, Auhood, Abdel Rahman N. Zekri, Mostafa H. Elberry, Ahmed M. Lymona, Mai M. Lotfy, Mohamed Abouelhoda, and Amira Salah El-Din Youssef. 2022. "Somatic Mutations Alter Interleukin Signaling Pathways in Grade II Invasive Breast Cancer Patients: An Egyptian Experience" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 44, no. 12: 5890-5901. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120401

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop