Next Article in Journal
Microalgae Indicators of Charophyte Habitats of South and Southeast Kazakhstan
Next Article in Special Issue
Formica picea and F. candida (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Synonyms or Two Species?
Previous Article in Journal
Population Genetic Structure of Endemic Fish Species Facilitating Their Survival in Changing Environments—A Case Study on the Genus Telestes in Croatia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Narrow-Headed Voles Species Complex (Cricetidae, Rodentia): Evidence for Species Differentiation Inferred from Transcriptome Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Molecular Characterization of Ctenotaenia marmotae (Frölich, 1802) Railliet, 1893 (Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae) Parasitizing Rodents of the Genus Marmota and Spermophilus from Eurasia

1
Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630091 Novosibirsk, Russia
2
State Research and Production Association, Scientific and Practical Center of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Bioresources, 220072 Minsk, Belarus
3
National Research Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
4
A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, The Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
5
V.V. Alekhin Central-Chernozem State Nature Biosphere Reserve, 305528 Zapovednyi, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(7), 531; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070531
Submission received: 15 May 2022 / Revised: 24 June 2022 / Accepted: 27 June 2022 / Published: 30 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phylogeny and Phylogeography of the Holarctic)

Abstract

:
Cestodes Ctenotaenia marmotae are a widespread parasite of Eurasian ground squirrels. Being the only valid species of its genus, it has been recorded in ten host species from the genera Marmota and Spermophilus. Its definitive hosts live in similar ecological conditions and their area covers a wide geographical territory. Therefore, it remained unclear whether C. marmotae is a single species and how high the level of its genetic variability is. The present study analyzed the variability of two mitochondrial cestode genes from four host species from geographically distant localities. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the newly obtained sequences form a species-level clade with already known sequences from the GenBank. Small genetic distances between the studied sequences indicate low intraspecific genetic variability within the C. marmotae, which may be a consequence of rapid expansion of the cestodes in ground squirrel species inhabiting the flat and mountain steppe landscapes in the past.

1. Introduction

Cestodes of the genus Ctenotaenia Railliet, 1893 (Anoplocephalidae family) are dominant and widespread endoparasites of the small intestine of ground squirrels of Eurasia (Marmotini tribe) [1]. They have been previously shown to parasitize 5 of 8 species of marmots Marmota (Blumenbach, 1779) and 5 of 16 species of susliks Spermophilus (F. Cuvier, 1825) [2] inhabiting Eurasia [3,4]. A study of preparations from the collection of the University of Neuchátel, Switzerland showed that there is one valid species in the genus Ctenotaenia, C. marmotae (Frölich, 1802) Railliet, 1893 [5]. Anoplocephalid cestodes that parasitize rodents are known to exhibit latent molecular diversity [6], geographic isolation, and/or host specificity [7,8]. Thus, P. omphalodes and P. jarrelli were previously considered as one species because of their high morphological similarity [8]. However, P. omphalodes parasitize five species of rodents of different genera [9], in contrast to P. jarrelli, which are only found in voles of the Alexandromys subgenus.
The aim of this study is to describe the variability of two mitochondrial genes of Ctenotaenia marmotae parasitizing marmots and susliks of geographically remote regions of Eurasia.

2. Materials and Methods

Data collection. The small number of investigated specimens of definitive hosts is due to the fact that some species of susliks and marmots currently have low numbers, and some are protected. For example, the mottled suslik is included in the Red Data Book of the Republic of Belarus [10], and the number of the red-cheeked suslik in the south of Western Siberia, according to our observations, has decreased significantly over the past three decades. The carcasses of the two suslik species from natural populations were examined for the presence of endoparasites. The carcass of the red-cheeked suslik Spermophilus erythrogenys Brandt, 1841 was taken from a dog that captured it near a burrow on 13 May 2020, near Doronino village (Toguchinsky District, Novosibirsk Oblast, Russia) (Figure 1). Twelve adult cestodes were found in the intestines of this host. The carcass of a mottled suslik S. suslicus (Guldenstaedt, 1770) was taken from a gray crow on 20 May 2020 near Nesvizh town (Minsk Region, Republic of Belarus) (Figure 1). The gastrointestinal tract of the suslik was extracted and frozen. During its autopsy, seven specimens of cestodes were found.
In August 2013, cestode proglottids were found in feces of grey marmot Marmota baibacina near its burrow in Ulandryk (Kosh-Agachsky district, Altai Republic) (Figure 1). The systematic position and Latin names of the definitive hosts are given according to [2]. The discovered specimens of cestodes were relaxed in the water and fixed in 70% ethanol. The tapeworms were stained in Ehrlich’s acid haematoxylin, differentiated in a 3% aqueous solution of ferric ammonium sulphate, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, cleared in eugenol, and mounted in Damar gum. All found specimens were morphologically identified as Ctenotaenia marmotae and vouchers were deposited in the parasitological collection of the Zoological Museum of the Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS (ISEA AK Ctm01, AK Ctm02).
Molecular identification and phylogeny analysis. Total DNA was isolated using a 5% Chelex-100 solution (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The isolation protocol followed the manufacturer’s recommendations for InstaGene™ Matrix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). We used 2–5 μL of the obtained supernatant to perform PCR. Fragments of two mitochondrial genes were amplified using primers COX-F, COX-R (cox1), and Cyclo_Nad1F, Cyclo_trnNR (nad1) [6]. The amplicons were purified and sequenced directly on an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyser at the Genomics Core Facility ICBFM SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia). Original sequences were submitted to the GenBank (Table 1). In addition, sequences of anoplocephalid cestodes from the GenBank database were used (Table 2). Sequence alignment by Clustal Omega [12], phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method was conducted in MEGA 11 [13]. The best substitution model for unpartitioned loci (cox1 and nad1: GTR + G + I) were identified in MEGA 11 according to the Akaike information criterion. Branch support was estimated with 1000 bootstrap replicates. All positions containing missing data were eliminated (complete deletion option).

3. Results and Discussion

We have obtained the sequences of two mitochondrial genes of the cestode Ctenotaenia marmotae (cox1 and nad1) from three rodent species from Russia and Belarus (Table 1). When comparing these sequences with those of mitochondrial genes of C. marmotae from the alpine marmot Marmota marmota (AY568187/HM134271), we have revealed a high percentage of identity for both markers (Table 3). Thus, the percentage of identity was 94.8–99.5% for the cox1 gene, and 96.9 to 99% for the nad1 gene, with reading lengths of 591– 629 and 784–795 nucleotides, respectively.
Analyzing the sequences of the cox1 gene of C. marmotae, we found that the closest to each other are the sequences of cestodes from both suslik species with 99% identity. The sequence from C. marmotae from the Alpine marmot was the most distant sequence from susliks cestodes. However, it is close to the sequence of C. marmotae from M. baibacina inhabiting the Altai Mountains (Ulandryk). The level of divergence of cestode from Alpine marmota from other cestode specimens suggests that isolation of M. marmota in European mountain ranges affected cestodes but did not lead to divergence within C. marmotae species. We observed the same trend by comparing the sequences of the nad1 gene.
All eight sequences of the two C. marmotae mitochondrial genes are unique, separate haplotypes. For the cox1 gene, 35 polymorphic sites were identified, with an aligned sequence length of 591 nucleotide pairs. For the nad1 gene, 33 polymorphic sites were identified (sequence length of 776 nucleotide pairs).
On a phylogenetic tree (Figure 2A,B) constructed for each of the molecular markers used, all C. marmotae specimens from the four definitive host species form a single clade. Given the scale of the trees, the differences between the nad1 gene sequences in the C. marmotae clade are comparable to those of the cox1 gene. However, in both cases, the level of divergence within the C. marmotae clade, visually assessed by branch length, does not exceed the level of divergence within clades representing species of the same genus (e.g., in the genus Paranoplocephala). The sequences of C. marmotae from S. suslicus from Belarus and S. erythrogenys from Western Siberia turned out to be as close as possible to each other, while the distance between the localities is approximately 3680 km. We note that there is a weak tendency to form two clusters corresponding to different taxonomic groups of hosts—susliks and marmots. This can be traced for both genes. This is especially true for the C. marmotae subcluster from susliks. However, the revealed differences between different host groups do not allow a definitive conclusion. Additional samples of C. marmotae should be investigated to verify this assumption, preferably from the final host species not involved in this study.
Widespread distribution of close haplotypes over a large territory taking into account parasitism in four species of the final hosts may indicate rapid geographical expansion in the host areas. For example, it was shown that the cestode Paranoplocephala omphalodes, widely represented in Eurasia and parasitizing in 5 rodent species, has a low haplotype divergence of the mitochondrial gene cox1 [9].
According to available data, C. marmotae has been found in various species of ground squirrels: Marmota baibacina, M. bobac, M. marmota, M. sibirica, M. himalayana, Spermophilus pigmaeus, S. erythrogenys, S. suslicus, S. citellus, S. undulatus, S. xanthoprymnus [2]. Marmots and susliks are known to be widely distributed in Eurasia, predominantly inhabiting mountains and plain steppe habitats [15]. In Eurasia, an extensive steppe belt, formed after the last glaciation, extends from Eastern Europe almost to the Far East. Social way of life and the use of burrows promotes the spread of cestodes between animals (including different species) in host populations [16].
The analysis of the current distribution of marmots and ground squirrels [2], in which Ctenotaenia marmotae has been found, concludes that their ranges, located in plain or mountain-steppe landscapes of Eurasia, either overlap or are close to each other. This may have contributed to the spread of C. marmotae among various marmot and suslik species.
Thus, the study of the cestode C. marmotae, which parasitizes two species of marmots and two species of susliks in different parts of Eurasia, revealed a low divergence of the mitochondrial genes cox1 and nad1. The closer distances between the gene sequences of cestodes of suslik species compared to those of marmot species may reflect a greater level of divergence between cestodes parasitizing host animals belonging to different genera. However, the limited sampling of specimens and localities does not allow further phylogeographical inferences. Future research should prioritize expanded sampling to clarify the evolutionary, host, and biogeographical dynamics within C. marmotae.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: A.K. and L.A.; collected the samples: A.S., N.L., S.A., S.K. and V.Z.; performed the experiments: A.B., E.V., A.G.; analyzed the data: P.V., E.V., A.G.; wrote and edited the paper: A.K., S.A., L.A. and P.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project number 20-54-00038 and Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research: Б20P-303 (4 May 2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Field procedures and protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals (protocol #2020-02 dated 14 May 2020 and #2021-1 dated 28 April 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found in the GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ (accessed on 15 May 2022); nucleotide sequence access numbers are given in Table 2).

Acknowledgments

We thank our colleagues from the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, including Alexei Abramov, Sergei Mironov, and Vladimir Platonov, for inviting them to the expedition to the remote regions of the Altai Republic in 2013. We also thank all the colleagues who in different years collected helminths from the ground squirrels of Eurasia, in particular, Dmitry Taranenko. The collected material significantly expanded the collection of the laboratory of parasitology of the IS&EA SB RAS and served as the basis for studying the morphology of cestodes. We are also grateful to the three anonymous Reviewers for their valuable advice, which significantly improved the original manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beveridge, I. Family Anoplocephalidae Cholodkovsky, 1902. In Keys to the Cestode Parasites of Vertebrates; Khalil, L.F., Jones, A., Bray, R.A., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1994; pp. 315–366. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wilson, D.E.; Reederm, D.M. (Eds.) Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd ed.; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  3. Preleuthner, M.; Calderola, S.; Lanfranchi, P.; Prosl, H. Parasiten des Alpenmurmeltieres (Marmota marmota): Systematik, Entwicklung, Verbreitung. Stapfia 1999, 63, 77–92. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ryzhikov, K.M.; Gvozdev, E.V.; Tokobaev, M.M.; Shaldybin, L.S.; Macaberidze, G.V.; Merkusheva, I.V.; Nadtochij, E.V.; Hohlova, I.G.; Sharpilo, L.D. Keys to the Helminths of The Rodent Fauna of the USSR. Cestodes and Trematodes; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1978. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  5. Beveridge, I. A taxonomic revision of the genera Cittotaenia Riehm, 1881, Ctenotaenia, Railliet, 1893, Mosgovoyia Spasskii, 1951 and Pseudocittotaenia Tenora, 1976. (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae). Mem. Mus. Natl. D’hist. Nat. Ser. A Zool. 1978, 107, 1–64. [Google Scholar]
  6. Haukisalmi, V.; Hardman, L.M.; Hoberg, E.P.; Henttonen, H. Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic revision of Paranoplocephala Lühe, 1910 sensu lato (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea, Anoplocephalidae). Zootaxa 2014, 3873, 371–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Haukisalmi, V.; Wickström, L.M.; Henttonen, H.; Hantula, J.; Gubányi, A. Molecular and morphological evidence for multiple species within Paranoplocephala omphalodes (Cestoda, Anoplocephalidae) in Microtus voles (Arvicolinae). Zool. Scr. 2004, 33, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haukisalmi, V.; Henttonen, H.; Hardman, L.M. Taxonomy and diversity of Paranoplocephala spp. (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) in voles and lemmings of Beringia, with a description of three new species. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2006, 89, 277–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Vlasenko, P.; Abramov, S.; Bugmyrin, S.; Dupal, T.; Fomenko, N.; Gromov, A.; Zakharov, E.; Ilyashenko, V.; Kabdolov, Z.; Tikunov, A.; et al. Geographical distribution and hosts of the cestode Paranoplocephala omphalodes (Hermann, 1783) Lühe, 1910 in Russia and adjacent territories. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 3543–3548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kachanovsky, I.M.; Nikiforov, M.E.; Parfenov, V.I. (Eds.) Red Data Book of the Republic of Belarus: Rare and Threatened Species of Wild Animals; Petrus Brovka Belarusian Encyclopedia: Minsk, Belarus, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  11. Haukisalmi, V.; Hardman, L.M.; Foronda, P.; Feliu, C.; Henttonen, H. Systematic relationships of Mosgovoyia Spasskii, 1951 (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) and related genera inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data. Syst. Parasitol. 2010, 77, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sievers, F.; Higgins, D.G. Multiple Sequence Alignment Methods. Methods in Molecular Biology; Russell, D.J., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, MJ, USA, 2014; Volume 1079, pp. 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Krivopalov, A.; Vlasenko, P.; Abramov, S.; Akimova, L.; Barkhatova, A.; Dokuchaev, N.; Gromov, A.; Konyaev, S.; Lopatina, N.; Vlasov, E.; et al. Distribution and Molecular Diversity of Paranoplocephala kalelai (Tenora, Haukisalmi & Henttonen, 1985) Tenora, Murai & Vaucher, 1986 in Voles (Rodentia: Myodes) in Eurasia. Diversity 2022, 14, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gromov, I.M.; Bibikov, D.I.; Kalabuchov, N.I.; Mejer, M.H. Fauna SSSR. Mlekopitajuscie [Mammalia]. Nazemnye belich’i (Marmotinae). Tom 3, Vyp. 2; Nauka: Moskva, Russia; Leningrad, Russia, 1995; 464p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  16. Schmid-Hempel, P. Sociality and parasite transmission. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2021, 75, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of sampling localities of Ctenotaenia marmotae. Circles indicate samples collected by the authors; triangles indicate samples according to [11]. Locality numbers refer to Table 1.
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of sampling localities of Ctenotaenia marmotae. Circles indicate samples collected by the authors; triangles indicate samples according to [11]. Locality numbers refer to Table 1.
Diversity 14 00531 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships of Ctenotaenia marmotae (shown in red). The analysis was performed by the maximum likelihood method. (A): cox1 gene tree; (B): nad1 gene tree. Each tree is given to scale, with branch lengths measured in number of substitutions per site. The bootstrap support value is set in the nodes of the trees; values below 75 are not shown; the number of bootstrap replications is 1000. All positions containing missing data were eliminated (complete deletion option). GenBank access numbers in bold are those obtained by the authors. Mb—Marmota baibacina; Mm—M. marmota; Se—Spermophilus erythrogenys; Ss—S. suslicus; SEA—South East Altai; NSO—Novosibirsk Oblast; Nya—Nesvizh.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships of Ctenotaenia marmotae (shown in red). The analysis was performed by the maximum likelihood method. (A): cox1 gene tree; (B): nad1 gene tree. Each tree is given to scale, with branch lengths measured in number of substitutions per site. The bootstrap support value is set in the nodes of the trees; values below 75 are not shown; the number of bootstrap replications is 1000. All positions containing missing data were eliminated (complete deletion option). GenBank access numbers in bold are those obtained by the authors. Mb—Marmota baibacina; Mm—M. marmota; Se—Spermophilus erythrogenys; Ss—S. suslicus; SEA—South East Altai; NSO—Novosibirsk Oblast; Nya—Nesvizh.
Diversity 14 00531 g002
Table 1. List of examined specimens of Ctenotaenia marmotae and GenBank accession numbers according to geographical origin. Specimens, except for AY568187 and HM134271, were collected and sequenced by the authors.
Table 1. List of examined specimens of Ctenotaenia marmotae and GenBank accession numbers according to geographical origin. Specimens, except for AY568187 and HM134271, were collected and sequenced by the authors.
Locality (Number)CoordinatesGenBank Acc. No. (Cox1/Nad1)Final Host
France (1)--AY568187/HM134271Marmota marmota (Linnaeus, 1758)
Nesvizh, Minsk Oblast, Belarus (2)53.24530438 N 26.76108783 EON459626/ON505824Spermophilus suslicus (Guldenstaedt, 1770)
Doronino, Novosibirsk Oblast, Russia (4)54.98292101 N 84.58460474 EON459627/ON505825Spermophilus erythrogenys Brandt, 1841
Ulandryk, Altai Republic, Russia (3)49.60679776 N 89.07580720 EON459628/ON505826Marmota baibacina Kastschenko, 1899
Table 2. The sequences list the anoplocephalid cestodes involved in the phylogenetic analysis. The list is given according to [6,11,14].
Table 2. The sequences list the anoplocephalid cestodes involved in the phylogenetic analysis. The list is given according to [6,11,14].
Cestode SpeciesCox1Nad1Final Host
Paranoplocephala jarrelliAY181523, AY181540, AY181533, EF688302, EF688303, EF583964KJ778952Microtus oeconomus
Paranoplocephala kalelaiEF583961, ON533421, ON533414, ON533416, LC535248ON548168, OM548169, ON548176, ON548178Myodes rufocanus
Paranoplocephala macrocephalaKJ778922, AY1811515,KJ778954Microtus longicaudus
AY181517 Microtus pennsylvanicus
Paranoplocephala omphalodesAY18122, AY18124, Microtus agrestis
AY18139 Myodes glareolus
Rauschoides alternataAY181502KJ778959Dicrostonyx groenlandicus
Rauschoides arcticaAY181505KJ778958Dicrostonyx groenlandicus
Gulyaevia buryatiensisDQ445259KJ778940Myodes rufocanus
Gulyaevia longivaginataDQ445261KJ778941Myodes rutilus
Douthittia nordenskioeldiAY568204KJ778933-KJ778937Microtus miurus
Douthittia nearcticaKJ778910KJ778931, KJ778932Myodes rutilus
Douthitta sp. KJ778938Myodes rutilus
Anoplocephaloides lemmiEU744307KJ778962Lemmus sibiricus
Anoplocephaloides kontrimavichusiAY568195HM134274Synaptomys borealis
Parandrya oeconomiAY568205KJ778949Microtus oeconomus
Parandrya feodoroviEF688300KJ778948Microtus sp.
Andrya rhopalocephalaAY189958HM134265Lepus europaeus
Equinia mamilliana---HM134268Equus caballus
Anoplocephala perfoliataAY568189---Equus caballus
Cestode species from the sister group of Andrya rhopalocephala & Ctenotaenia marmotae were included in the phylogenetic analysis [11]. Sequences AY568189 Anoplocephala perfoliata and HM134268 Equinia mamillana (for cox1 and nad1, respectively) were used as an outgroup.
Table 3. Sequence identity rates (%) of mitochondrial genes cox1 (above the diagonal) and nad1 (below the diagonal) of Ctenotaenia marmotae from different host species.
Table 3. Sequence identity rates (%) of mitochondrial genes cox1 (above the diagonal) and nad1 (below the diagonal) of Ctenotaenia marmotae from different host species.
Host M. baibacina (Altai, Russia)Host M. marmota (Alps, France)Host S. erythrogenus (West Siberia, Russia)Host S. suslicus (Belarus)
Host M. baibacina (Altai, Russia) 96.697.296.6
Host M. marmota (Alps, France)97.7 95.294.8
Host S. erythrogenus (West Siberia, Russia)98.097.2 99.5
Host S. suslicus (Belarus)97.796.999
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krivopalov, A.; Abramov, S.; Akimova, L.; Barkhatova, A.; Gromov, A.; Konyaev, S.; Lopatina, N.; Sidorovich, A.; Vlasov, E.; Vlasenko, P.; et al. Molecular Characterization of Ctenotaenia marmotae (Frölich, 1802) Railliet, 1893 (Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae) Parasitizing Rodents of the Genus Marmota and Spermophilus from Eurasia. Diversity 2022, 14, 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070531

AMA Style

Krivopalov A, Abramov S, Akimova L, Barkhatova A, Gromov A, Konyaev S, Lopatina N, Sidorovich A, Vlasov E, Vlasenko P, et al. Molecular Characterization of Ctenotaenia marmotae (Frölich, 1802) Railliet, 1893 (Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae) Parasitizing Rodents of the Genus Marmota and Spermophilus from Eurasia. Diversity. 2022; 14(7):531. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070531

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krivopalov, Anton, Sergey Abramov, Lyudmila Akimova, Alina Barkhatova, Anton Gromov, Sergey Konyaev, Natalia Lopatina, Anna Sidorovich, Egor Vlasov, Pavel Vlasenko, and et al. 2022. "Molecular Characterization of Ctenotaenia marmotae (Frölich, 1802) Railliet, 1893 (Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae) Parasitizing Rodents of the Genus Marmota and Spermophilus from Eurasia" Diversity 14, no. 7: 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070531

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop