Next Article in Journal
Effect of Life-History Traits and Habitat Condition on Genetic Diversity between Invasive and Native Plant Populations
Next Article in Special Issue
Lungfish and the Long Defeat
Previous Article in Journal
Freshwater Reservoir, Ecological Traps and Source-Sink Dynamics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Osteichthyan Fishes from the uppermost Norian (Triassic) of the Fuchsberg near Seinstedt, Lower Saxony (Germany)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A New Large †Pachycormiform (Teleosteomorpha: †Pachycormiformes) from the Lower Jurassic of Germany, with Affinities to the Suspension-Feeding Clade, and Comments on the Gastrointestinal Anatomy of Pachycormid Fishes

Diversity 2022, 14(12), 1026; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121026
by Samuel L. A. Cooper 1,2,*, Sam Giles 3,4, Holly Young 5 and Erin E. Maxwell 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diversity 2022, 14(12), 1026; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121026
Submission received: 4 November 2022 / Revised: 15 November 2022 / Accepted: 17 November 2022 / Published: 24 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evolution and Diversity of Fishes in Deep Time)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

this is a detailed and interesting work, which should be published after minor revisions.
Attached a pdf with some comments, corrections and additions.
Perhaps the rather long manuscript can be shortened a bit by restricting the comparisons to the discussion section and removing them from the description section of the new taxon. Are you sure you want to write Teleostei in the title of the manuscript? If so, I would explain that briefly in the text. According to Arratia 1999, 2013, 2015... the Pachycormiformes belong to the teleosteomorpha and not to the teleostei in the strict sense. For References see "Instructions for Authors" and adjust accordingly.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer, 

Thank you very much for taking the time to review our manuscript. Your comments were indeed very helpful. 

 

We have addressed all of the comments made on the manuscript and corrected all the typos which you helpfully highlighted. 

 

Following your comments, we have changed 'Teleostei' to 'Teleosteomorpha' in reference to Pachycormiformes. We have also made appropriate changes to the reference list to better fit the journal's style, as outlined in the 'Instructions for authors'. 

You may be of interest to know just for future reference, the Munich specimen of Pseudoasthenocormus retrodorsalis (BSPG1956 I 361) is not the holotype. Eastman's type specimen, according to Lambers (1992) is CM.4863, housed in the Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh. This is a common misconception which is often repeated in the literature. 

Best wishes,

Reviewer 2 Report

Cooper and colleagues describe a new actinopterygian fish from the Lower Jurassic Poseidonienschiefer Formation of southern Germany.

It is a superb work reporting detailed systematic descriptions of spectacular specimens also having exceptionally preserved the intestinal tracts.

The results of this study represent a significant contribution to the knowledge of the Pachycormiformes, a Mesozoic group of large ray-finned fish that could have a crucial role in the holostean-teleostean transition.

The manuscript appears well organized and well written, and I have only a few suggestions and corrections (mainly typos) reported in an annotated pdf file.

I particular, recommend using the binomial nomenclature for species names used for biozones and subzones in accordance with the International Stratigraphic Guide (https://www.idigbio.org/wiki/images/7/7f/255-271_Murphy_.pdf ) which recommends compliance with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Article 5.1: Principle of Binomial Nomenclature).

In conclusion, I strongly recommend the publication of this manuscript after a few minor corrections.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer, 

Thank you very much for taking the time to review our manuscript. Your comments were indeed very helpful. 

 

We have addressed all of the comments made on the manuscript and corrected all the typos which you helpfully highlighted. 

We have opted not to add generic names to the ammonite suzbzones because we have been informed by a colleague (Guenter Schweigert) that such a change would be unnecessary. Species name only is the more widely used scheme in previous published works on the Posidonienschiefer. We have asked the Editor for his decision on this, and will be happy to include them if the Editor asks for them. 

Best wishes, 

Back to TopTop