Next Article in Journal
Dihydromyrcenol Modulates Involucrin Expression through the Akt Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term Outcomes after Switching to Tenofovir Alafenamide in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanisms of BR Negative Regulatory Factor StBIN2 Maintaining Tuber Dormancy

1
College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
Potato Research and Development Center, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(4), 2244; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042244
Submission received: 7 December 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2024 / Accepted: 9 February 2024 / Published: 13 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Potato is an important food crop. After harvest, these tubers will undergo a period of dormancy. Brassinosteroids (BRs) are a new class of plant hormones that regulate plant growth and seed germination. In this study, 500 nM of BR was able to break the dormancy of tubers. Additionally, exogenous BR also upregulated BR signal transduction genes, except for StBIN2. StBIN2 is a negative regulator of BR, but its specific role in tuber dormancy remains unclear. Transgenic methods were used to regulate the expression level of StBIN2 in tubers. It was demonstrated that the overexpression of StBIN2 significantly prolonged tuber dormancy while silencing StBIN2 led to premature sprouting. To further investigate the effect of StBIN2 on tuber dormancy, RNA-Seq was used to analyze the differentially expressed genes in OE-StBIN2, RNAi-StBIN2, and WT tubers. The results showed that StBIN2 upregulated the expression of ABA signal transduction genes but inhibited the expression of lignin synthesis key genes. Meanwhile, it was also found that StBIN2 physically interacted with StSnRK2.2 and StCCJ9. These results indicate that StBIN2 maintains tuber dormancy by mediating ABA signal transduction and lignin synthesis. The findings of this study will help us better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying potato tuber dormancy and provide theoretical support for the development of new varieties using related genes.

1. Introduction

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an annual herbaceous plant of the Solanaceae family and the Solanaceae genus, with some advantages, such as high yield, strong adaptability, and tolerance to barren conditions [1]. It is the fourth largest staple food after rice, corn, and wheat [2]. China’s potato planting areas and total yield rank first in the world [3]. Potatoes play an important role in maintaining national stability and ensuring food security. After harvesting, potatoes need to undergo a period of dormancy before they can sprout. Different potato varieties have different dormancy periods [4]. Due to different actual production needs, commercial potatoes need to maintain dormancy without sprouting. Meanwhile, seed potatoes require their dormancy period to match the sowing date to maintain high seed potato vitality. The study of potato dormancy mechanisms can provide a theoretical basis for tuber dormancy regulation and storage preservation and has important practical significance for the development of the potato industry.
Tuber dormancy is a complex physiological mechanism involving multiple factors, and hormones play a pivotal role in determining the dormancy state of potato tubers [5]. There is a close relationship between Gibberellin (GA), Abscisic acid (ABA), and BR and tuber dormancy and sprouting [6]. Recent research has found that multiple hormones, rather than a single hormone, regulate potato dormancy and sprouting. The content and proportion of endogenous hormones significantly influence the state of potato dormancy and sprouting, and thus, maintaining a balance between several hormones is vital for promoting a particular growth state [7]. GA is a commonly used plant hormone for breaking the dormancy of seeds and tubers. GA treatment of potato tubers significantly hastens the rate of breaking dormancy compared to the control. In addition to breaking dormancy, GA promotes the growth of sprouts [8]. Overexpressing the GA biosynthesis gene GA20ox in potatoes results in a reduced dormancy period, revealing that GA negatively regulates tuber dormancy [9]. ABA and GA display antagonistic effects during tuber dormancy. ABA is the earliest and most extensively studied type in the study of potato tuber dormancy mechanisms. The ABA content is highest during tuber dormancy and rapidly decreases with the release of dormancy [10].
BR, classified as a major category of plant hormones, holds a pivotal role in influencing the growth and development of plants [11]. It actively participates in critical processes such as cell elongation, cell division, vascular differentiation, pollen development, seed germination, plant aging, and the response of plants to stress [12]. BR exerts an opposing influence on seed germination when compared to ABA. The application of external BR effectively represses the expression of BRI1, BSK1, BSU1, and BR-responsive genes within the leaf BR signaling pathway, ultimately enhancing yield [13]. Studies in quantitative phosphoproteomics suggest that BR facilitates the sprouting of potato tubers by modulating the phosphorylation of proteins [14]. BIN2 (Brassinolide insensitive 2) serves as the negative regulator in BR signal transduction. It inhibits BR signaling by phosphorylating BES1 and BZR1 [15]. BIN2 acts as a mediator between ABA and BR signal transduction. ABI1, ABI2, and ABI5 are members of the PP2C family and are negative regulators of ABA signaling. Research indicates that ABA can enhance the expression of BIN2 through ABI1, ABI2, and ABI5, influencing BR signal transduction and maintaining seed dormancy [16]. In Arabidopsis, the overexpression of BIN2 strengthens the inhibitory impact of ABA on seed germination and reinforces ABA signaling through the ABI5 signaling factor [17]. SnRK2s is a key protein in the ABA signaling pathway. StBIN2 protein augments ABA signal transduction by phosphorylating SnRK2.3 in potatoes [18]. Furthermore, the overexpression of StBIN2 was advantageous in promoting the formation of potato tubers and enhancing crop yield [19]. As a crucial kinase, BIN2 plays a significant role in the seed dormancy process. However, considering the distinct mechanism of potato dormancy, further investigation is required to ascertain whether StBIN2 contributes to maintaining dormancy in potatoes.
Lignin, a crucial secondary metabolite produced in the phenylalanine metabolic pathway of plant cells, is polymerized from phenylpropane monomers [20]. Upon synthesis within the cell, lignin monomers undergo polymerization catalyzed by peroxidase (POX) and lactose (LAC) to form biologically active lignin through a series of chemical reactions. Hydrophobic lignin is found in the seed coats of many species, and the lignin content is positively correlated with the degree of seed coat cracking [21]. This is beneficial for the transpiration and respiration of seeds. Studies have revealed that treating Anacamptis morio (Orchidaceae) seeds with laccase results in lignin degradation within the seed coat, leading to a two-fold increase in the seed germination rate compared to the control [22]. Polygonatum cyrtonema, an important medicinal plant, experiences difficulty in seed germination. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses have indicated that compared to non-germinated seeds, germinated seeds promote flavonoid synthesis, inhibit lignin synthesis, and facilitate the germination of Polygonatum cyrtonema seeds [23]. In Arabidopsis, a mutation of the lignin synthesis gene AtLAC15 leads to a reduction in seed coat lignin, promoting seed germination [24]. Furthermore, mutations in the Arabidopsis peroxidases, PRX2 and PRX25, result in a decreased seed germination rate [25]. Fatty alcohol hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (FTH) is an essential enzyme involved in the synthesis of cork resin. The downregulation of FTH expression in potatoes led to skin cracking and substantial water loss [26]. StSN2 played a crucial role in maintaining tuber dormancy, and metabolic studies indicated that it negatively regulated lignin synthesis to promote tuber dormancy [27]. Vulavala revealed that lignin and suberin were involved in potato periderm formation and maturation [28]. In short, potato skin can effectively reduce the respiration and transpiration of potatoes to maintain dormancy. Lignin is an important component of potato skin and also plays a positive role in maintaining tuber dormancy.
RNA-seq is a crucial tool in the field of transcriptomics research, helping to uncover the molecular mechanisms behind specific biological processes by analyzing variations in gene expression [29]. Over the past few years, the maturation of RNA-seq technology has led to its increasingly widespread application. In a study on drought resistance in sweet potatoes, RNA-seq identified the crucial roles played by the ABA, ethylene (ETH), and jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathways. These pathways contribute significantly to the resilience of sweet potatoes in the face of drought conditions [30]. Similarly, in investigations of low-temperature effects on cassava, RNA-seq has revealed the involvement of certain differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the metabolic processes of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This potentially explains the plant’s ability to withstand cold temperatures [31]. Furthermore, the dynamic examination of grain development stages through RNA-seq has revealed the molecular mechanisms governing cereal development. This provides a strong foundation for future investigations into the functional aspects of genes involved in millet grain development [32].
Potato tuber dormancy is a complex biological process. In recent years, there has been increasing research on the use of exogenous hormones to break tuber dormancy. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms behind it. In this study, we found that exogenous BR promoted tuber sprout but inhibited the expression of StBIN2. StBIN2 is a negative regulatory factor of BR and plays an important role in plant growth and development. To explore the role of StBIN2 in regulating tuber dormancy, we created overexpression and silencing materials for StBIN2. We analyzed the dormancy period and germination rate of StBIN2 transgenic tubers, and the results showed that StBIN2 was a key gene for maintaining tuber dormancy. The RNA-seq and protein interaction experiments elucidated that StBIN2 maintains tuber dormancy by promoting ABA signal transduction and inhibiting lignin synthesis. The results of this study have improved our understanding of the molecular mechanism of potato tuber dormancy and provided theoretical support for potato molecular breeding.

2. Results

2.1. BR Promotes Tuber Sprout by Inhibiting StBIN2

BR plays an important role in promoting seed germination, and some studies have shown that BR can break the dormancy of tubers and promote sprouting [14]. In order to further investigate the role of BR in promoting tuber sprouting, this experiment treated the tubers with 500 nM of 24-eBL (analogs of artificially synthesized BR) and stored them at 20 ± 2 °C. The results showed that 500 nM of 24-eBL significantly promoted the germination of tubers, and the bud length under 24-eBL treatment was significantly higher than the control at 30 d and 45 d (Figure 1A). The spout length at 45 days was 4.32 times that of the control (Figure 1B). Subsequently, we conducted a statistical analysis of the germination rate during storage (a bud length ≥2 mm is defined as a sprout). The results showed that 24-eBL significantly improved the sprouting rate of tubers, with the treatment group fully germinating about 10 days earlier than the control (Figure 1C). From this, it can be seen that BR can break the dormancy of tubers and promote sprouting.
It has been verified that BR can enhance the sprouting of tubers. The transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of early dormancy and sprouting has revealed that BR signaling genes play a crucial role in tuber sprouting [33]. In order to confirm the involvement of BR signaling genes in tuber sprout, the expression of key genes in the BR signaling pathway was examined. qPCR results demonstrated that BR treatment inhibited the expression of StBIN2 compared to WT and delayed its peak time (Figure 2A). On the other hand, BSU1, BR1, and BZR1 act as positive regulatory factors in the BR signaling pathway. qPCR results showed that BR promoted the expression of StBSU1, StBR1, and StBZR1 during storage, particularly in the late dormancy stage, being significantly higher than the control, suggesting a positive role in tuber sprout (Figure 2B–D). It can be inferred that StBIN2 may play a major role in tuber dormancy.

2.2. StBIN2 Maintains Tuber Dormancy

To investigate the function of StBIN2 in tuber dormancy, we created overexpression and silencing materials of StBIN2 through potato genetic transformation. The qPCR results showed that compared to WT, the transcription levels of StBIN2 in OE-StBIN2#2 and OE-StBIN2#3 were 2.8 and 3.04-fold higher, respectively, while the two silent lines were 0.40 and 0.38-fold higher, respectively (Figure 3A). We stored the harvested tubers for statistical purposes. After 60 days of storage, we observed and measured the length of the sprout. We found that overexpression of StBIN2 significantly prolonged the dormancy period of the tubers (Figure 3B), leading to slow bud growth. Specifically, the bud length of WT was two-fold higher than that of OE-StBIN2 and 0.6-fold higher than that of RNAi-StBIN2, respectively (Figure 3C). Throughout the storage period, the germination rate of RNAi-StBIN2 was higher than that of WT and OE-StBIN2. Complete sprouting occurred one week earlier than in WT and 2 weeks earlier than in OE-StBIN2 (Figure 3D). Therefore, StBIN2 has the function of maintaining tuber dormancy.

2.3. Analysis and Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes

In order to investigate the molecular mechanism of StBIN2 in tuber dormancy, we conducted RNA-seq analysis on potato tuber budding eyes stored for 45 days (the critical period from dormancy to germination). The Illumina NovaSeq6000 sequencing platform was used for PE150 mode sequencing. RNA-seq analysis was conducted on three biological replicas of WT (referred to as W), OE-StBIN2 (referred to as B), and RNAi-StBIN2 (referred to as R) potatoes. The Illumina NovaSeq6000 sequencing platform was utilized for PE150 pattern sequencing. This study completed the transcriptome analysis of nine samples, with 382218628 clean data retained after removing adapters and low-quality sequences (Supplementary Table S1). The Q30 base percentage of each sample was 95% or above, and the GC content ranged from 43.84% to 45.045% (Supplementary Table S2). The RNA-seq reads for each library ranged from 84.93% to 88.79% and were successfully mapped to the potato genome (Supplementary Table S3). The Clean Reads of each sample were aligned against the S. tuberosum DM reference genome (V6.1). Using DESeq2 for differential analysis. We established two comparative groups, B vs. W and R vs. WT, to investigate the gene expression differences caused by different levels of StBIN2. Differential gene screening was performed using criteria of Fold Change ≥ 2 and FDR < 0.01; the resulting differentially expressed gene list underwent functional enrichment analysis. We identified a total of 3508 differentially expressed genes as follows: 2806 (938 upregulated, 1868 downregulated) and 702 (277 upregulated, 425 downregulated) in B vs. WT and R vs. WT, respectively (Supplementary Table S4) (Figure 4C); the 496 genes were identified in both B vs WT and R vs WT (Figure 4D).

2.4. Gene Ontology (GO) Analysis

In the analysis of the biological processes of GO, we found that the number of GO terms in B vs W was 1200 (Supplementary Table S5), while that in R vs W was 2578 (Supplementary Table S6). This data strongly suggests that the physiological metabolism inside the tuber became more intense after the expression of StBIN2 was suppressed, providing more possibility for the supply of substances and energy required for sprouting. ABA is a hormone that plays an important role in tuber dormancy [34]. In B vs W and R vs W, we screened out the ABA activation signal pathway (GO: 0009787) (Figure 5). In this pathway, genes such as StSnRK2.2 (Soltu.DM.08G023690), StABI5 (Soltu.DM.11G016910), StBZIP (Soltu.DM.09G003280), and StABI3 (Soltu.DM.04G033590) showed significant differences in their TPM values (Supplementary Figure S1). This suggests that StBIN2 may maintain tuber dormancy by regulating the ABA signal pathway. Furthermore, peroxidase is a key substance that promotes lignin synthesis [35]. Studies have shown that the content of lignin is directly related to tuber dormancy [27]. In the GO analysis, we found that both B vs W and R vs W were associated with the lignin synthesis pathway (GO: 0009809) (Figure 5). Among them, B vs W had seven related genes enriched, while R vs W had 15. Among these genes, StCCJ9 (Soltu.DM.08G023690) and StPOD (Soltu.DM.01G044300) showed significant differences in their TPM values (Supplementary Figure S1). This suggests that StBIN2 may inhibit lignin synthesis by affecting peroxidase, thereby affecting tuber dormancy and germination. Additionally, GO analysis also involved the JA signal metabolism pathway (GO:0009694) (Figure 5) and the starch decomposition metabolism process (GO:0005983) (Figure 5). Studies have shown that jasmonic acid can help break dormancy in pear buds [36], while starch decomposition can provide energy for tuber sprouting, accelerating the processes [37]. These findings further demonstrate the complexity of tuber dormancy, which involves multiple biological processes. StBIN2 may maintain tuber dormancy by regulating multiple pathways, providing us with further directions for exploration.

2.5. RT-qPCR of the Selected DEGs

To ensure the reliability of our RNA-seq data, we selected nine differentially expressed genes for validation using qPCR. We extracted RNA from the tuber buds of OE-StBIN2, RNAi-StBIN2, and WT that had been stored for 45 days. We reversed transcribed the RNA into cDNA for qPCR experiments. The qPCR results confirmed that StBIN2 indeed promoted the expression of StSnRK2.2, StAB13, StABI5, and StBZIP. These are key genes in the ABA signaling pathway (Figure 6A–D). Furthermore, in the silencing material, due to the reduced inhibitory effect of StBIN2, the expression levels of BR signal transduction and synthesis genes StBZR1 and StDWF were found to increase (Figure 6F,G). Additionally, we observed that the overexpression of StBIN2 suppressed the expression of StPOD and StCCJ9 (a homolog of peroxidase AtPER12) (Figure 6H,I). When we compared the qPCR results of the selected genes with TPM values (Supplementary Table S7), we observed a consistent expression trend. Therefore, we can confidently infer that our transcriptome data is reliable, and the differentially expressed genes screened can be used for further analysis in subsequent experiments.

2.6. Physical Interactions of StBIN2 Protein

Protein interaction plays a pivotal role in cellular signal transduction [38]. Previous studies have shown that BIN2 can regulate various life activities by interacting with multiple proteins in plants [39]. In Arabidopsis, the interaction between BIN2 and SnRK2.2 positively regulates the ABA signaling pathway [40]. CONSTANS (CO) is a key regulator of floral initiation in response to the photoperiod, and GhBIN2 delays flowering by phosphorylating the Thr280 residue of CO in Arabidopsis [41]. ICE1 (Inducer of CBF expression 1) is the first identified transcription factor that enhances plant cold resistance by positively regulating CBF3 [42]. The interaction between HbBIN2 and HbICE1 negatively regulates rubber tolerance to cold stress by inhibiting the transcriptional activity of HbICE1 [43]. BIN2 phosphorylates JAZ1, an inhibitor of the jasmonic acid pathway, leading to the degradation of JAZ protein and negatively regulating plant defense against Verticillium dahliae in Arabidopsis and cotton [44].
We employed the yeast two-hybrid antibody optimization system (Y2H-AOS) [45] and luciferase complementary assays to further investigate the interaction between StSnRK2.2 and StCCJ9. The Y2H-AOS results revealed a distinct protein binding pattern between StBIN2 + StCCJ9 and StBIN2 + StSnRK2.2, with confidence scores exceeding 0.9 (confidence scores > 0.8 indicating a high likelihood of interaction) (Figure 7A,B). The results from the dual luciferase complementary experiment were also promising. Fluorescence (red area in tobacco) was observed in tobacco infiltrated with StBIN2 + StCCJ9, StBIN2 + StSnRK2.2, and a positive control, while no fluorescence was observed in the negative control (Figure 7C). The LUC enzyme activity detection revealed that the enzyme activity of StBIN2 + StCCJ9 and StBIN2 + StSnRK2.2 was more than five times higher than that of the negative control (Figure 7D). Through bioinformatics analysis and dual luciferase complementary experiments, we have strong evidence supporting the existence of a protein interaction between StBIN2 and both StSnRK2.2 and StCCJ9.

3. Discussion

BR, a vital growth regulator in plants, has been shown to play a positive role in seed germination of species such as Arabidopsis, rice, and oilseed rape [46,47]. Earlier reports indicated that exogenous BR could promote potato tuber sprouting by regulating protein phosphorylation [14]. In this study, we observed a four-fold increase in sprout length in tubers treated with 500 nM of BR compared to the control after 45 days (Figure 1B). Additionally, the dormancy period of these tubers was shortened by approximately 10 days (Figure 1C). Subsequently, we examined the expression of BR signaling genes during storage and found that BR treatment promoted the expression of signaling genes except for StBIN2. This indicates that BR can promote tuber sprouting not only through protein phosphorylation but also by enhancing the expression of responsive genes (Figure 2A). Surprisingly, another study reported a decrease in the expression of BR synthesis and signaling genes in potato leaves treated with 300 nM of BR, except for StBIN2 [13]. This discrepancy could be attributed to the varying sensitivities of different tissues to BR. Nevertheless, under 500 nM of BR treatment, the tuber dormancy was indeed shortened, confirming that BR has the ability to break tuber dormancy.
As a negative regulator of BR, BIN2 can bind to proteins in the ABA signaling pathway to positively regulate the ABA signaling pathway [40]. Abscisic acid insensitive 5 (ABI5) is an important transcription factor in the ABA signaling pathway. In Arabidopsis, BIN2 phosphorylates ABI5, thereby positively regulating the ABA response to inhibit seed germination [17]. SnRK2s are key proteins in ABA signal transduction [48]. In Arabidopsis, BIN2 interacts with SnRK2.2/2.3/2.6 and phosphorylates them, thereby positively regulating the ABA signaling pathway [40]. In this study, we confirmed that StBIN2 interacted with StSnrk2.2 in tobacco, and RNA-seq results indicated that StBIN2 promoted the expression of StSnRK2.2. Additionally, the expression levels of ABI3 and ABI5 were also elevated in the overexpressed tubers, indicating that StBIN2 interacted with StSnRK2.2 to positively regulate ABA signal transduction and maintain tuber dormancy. Fortunately, previous studies have found that StBIN2 interacts with ABI1, PP2C2s, ABI5, and SnRK2.2 in yeast [19]. This further confirms that StBIN2 mediates the ABA signaling pathway to maintain tuber dormancy.
In previous studies, it was found that the roughness and cracking of the pericarp are correlated with lignin content. When the pericarp cracks, water loss becomes severe, leading to a shorter fruit lifespan [49]. The skin of potato tubers serves as the primary barrier for water retention. Previous research found that the overexpression of StSN2 resulted in smoother skin with slower water loss, leading to a prolonged dormancy period. Silencing StSN2 had the opposite effect. Further exploration revealed that silencing StSN2 elevated lignin content, leading to the collapse of the periderm and skin cracking [27]. My previous research has shown that StSN2 interacts with StBIN2 to enhance StBIN2 expression [18]. It can be inferred that StBIN2 may function similarly to StSN2 in regulating lignin synthesis. In this study, RNA-seq and qPCR results both indicated that StBIN2 inhibited the expression of key peroxidase genes StPOD and StCCJ9. There is an interaction between StBIN2 and StCCJ9 in tobacco. Peroxidases catalyze the synthesis of lignin monomers. In Arabidopsis, the prx2 and prx25 mutant seeds have reduced lignin levels but higher germination rates than WT [25]. In citrus, overexpression of CsPrx25 enhances cell wall lignification [46]. RNAi-mediated silencing of StSN2 in potatoes results in elevated peroxidase levels, including Prx1, Prx2, Prx4, Prx5, and Prx6 [27]. These findings suggest that StBIN2 can regulate lignin synthesis through peroxidases, ultimately suppressing tuber sprouting.
In summary, this study has revealed that 500 nM of BR can break the dormancy of potato tubers. StBIN2 has been identified as the key gene that maintains tuber dormancy. StBIN2 primarily maintains tuber dormancy through two mechanisms. First, it interacts with StSnRK2.2 to activate the ABA signaling pathway and maintain tuber dormancy. Additionally, StBIN2 interacts with StCCJ9 to downregulate peroxidase-related gene expression and negatively regulate lignin synthesis, ultimately inhibiting tuber sprouting. In addition, the other differentially expressed genes identified by RNA-seq provide theoretical support for the functional analysis of StBIN2, which can further explore other functions of StBIN2.

4. Material and Method

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

‘Chuanyu 10’ (WT) is a common tetraploid potato variety widely used in the southwest region of China. It is a medium and early maturing variety cultivated by the Crop Research Institute of Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The virus-free tissue culture seedlings of ‘Chuanyu 10’ were provided by the Potato Research and Development Center of Sichuan Agricultural University.
We used plant tissue culture technology to expand sterile potato seedlings. We inserted the seedlings into MS medium for growth and placed them in a tissue culture room at 20 °C with a 16 h/8 h light and dark cycle. After 25 days of tissue culture, we planted the tissue culture seedlings in a substrate containing coconut shells. We regularly watered them. After 90–100 days, we harvested the tubers. Following the harvest, the tubers underwent a cleaning and drying process. Subsequently, tubers of consistent size were chosen and stored in a shaded area at a temperature of 20 °C for the next experiment.
We planted Nicotiana benthamiana seeds in a substrate and cultured them for one month under a temperature of 20 °C and a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle. Then, we used them for dual luciferase experiments.

4.2. Generation of StBIN2 Transgenic Potato Lines

After sequence alignment analysis, we selected the 40 bp to 324 bp segments within the open reading frame (ORF) region of StBIN2 (Soltu.DM.03G001350.2) as the most suitable target sequence for RNA interference (RNAi). Subsequently, we inserted it into the pBWA(V)KS vector, creating an interference vector for the StBIN2 gene. To achieve an overexpression of StBIN2, we inserted the full-length StBIN2 (1149 bp) into the pBI121 vector with the 35S promoter, resulting in the construction of the overexpression vector. The constructed vectors were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 and cultured in a YEB liquid medium. Potato stem segments (0.5–1 cm) from the ‘Chuanyu 10’ variety were immersed in the bacterial suspension for 3–5 min. Subsequently, the treated segments were transferred to a differentiating culture set to induce shoot development [50]. Finally, we obtained sterile plants with different levels of expression of SBIN2.

4.3. Hormone Treatment

To conduct hormone treatment, the 60 tubers were immersed in 1.5 L of distilled water (with the addition of 100 μL of DMSO) and 500 nM of 24-epibrassinolide (a highly active BR dissolved in DMSO, Sigma Aldrich, Shanghai, China) for a duration of 30 min. Following this, the tubers were removed and allowed to dry [14]. Subsequently, the dried tubers were placed in a square paper box measuring 15 cm × 15 cm × 15 cm. This box was positioned in an environment maintained at 20 °C. Periodically, at intervals of one week, the tubers were examined for signs of sprouting.

4.4. RNA-Seq Analysis

Total RNA from tuber budding eyes was extracted using the MolPure® Plant RNA Kit (YEASEN, Shanghai, China). The quality and quantity of the prepared samples were estimated using a NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (IMPLEN, Westlake Village, CA, USA). Next, the samples were mailed to APExBIO Technology LLC (Shanghai, China) for pair-end RNA sequencing on a PE150 Sequencing System. The raw data obtained from sequencing was subjected to adapter removal and low-quality filtering to obtain filtered data. HISAT2 was used to map the trimmed reads to the S. tuberosum DM reference genome (V6.1). The Stringtie software was employed for transcript reconstruction, assembling accurate transcripts, and quantifying the expression levels of each gene or transcript. Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 [51]. DEGs were identified via pairwise sample comparisons in adjacent sampling points (B vs WT and R vs WT). Genes with an adjusted |log2 (fold-change)| > 1 and p-value < 0.05 were defined as differentially expressed genes [52]. These DEGs were subjected to GO enrichment analyses using the GOseq R package, with p-values of < 0.05 as the cut-off for the significantly enriched GO [53]. The KEGG database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/; accessed on 16 November 2023) was used to test the statistically enriched KEGG pathways, with p-values < 0.05 as the threshold value of the significantly enriched pathways [54].

4.5. Validation of RNA-Seq Using RT-qPCR

To further validate the transcriptome data, nine genes were selected for qRT-PCR. We extracted RNA from the tuber buds and used 1 μg of RNA for reverse transcription into cDNA using Hifair II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (YEASEN, Shanghai, China). qPCR was carried out using the Hieff® qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (YEASEN, Shanghai, China) and Bio-Rad CFX96 (Bio-Rad CFX96, Hercules, CA, USA). The primers are listed in Supplemental Table S8. The gene expression was normalized to the internal reference gene EF-1αL. In this experiment, we conducted three biological replicates.

4.6. Dual-Luciferase Assay

To obtain the coding sequence (CDS) of StBIN2, StCCJ9 (Soltu.DM.04G027660), and StSnRK2.2 (Soltu.DM.08G023690), we performed PCR amplification. The StBIN2 gene was cloned into the nLUC vector, and the StSnRK2.2 and StCCJ9 genes were inserted into the cLUC vector. Subsequently, the constructed plasmids were separately transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101. The transformed strains were cultured overnight in the YEB medium. Next, the StBIN2 bacterial solution was mixed with the StSnRK2.2 and StCCJ9 bacterial solutions, and the mixtures were infiltrated into tobacco leaves. After 36 h, the leaves were subjected to a photo recording using a molecular imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). LUC enzyme activity detection was performed using a dual luciferase reporter assay kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) [18] for this experiment. The experiment was repeated three times biologically. The primers are listed in Supplemental Table S8.

4.7. Protein Interaction Bioinformatics Analysis

Y2H-AOS is a suite that integrates homology search, template-based modeling, structural prediction, molecular docking, biological information integration, and work management for powerful and fast protein docking [45]. By inputting the amino acid sequences of proteins, the HDOCK server automatically predicts their interactions through a hybrid algorithm based on template and template-free docking [54].

4.8. Statistical Analysis

All experiments in this study were independently repeated three times, and the data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). The statistical analysis was initially performed using SPSS 14.0 software (IBM, New York, NY, USA), while the figures were originally created using Origin 2021 software (Origin Lab, Northampton, MA, USA). The significance of differences was denoted using different lowercase letters.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25042244/s1.

Author Contributions

S.L. and C.C. drafted the manuscript, analyzed data, and prepared figures; L.Y. and L.L. provided materials and described results; Q.W. and X.W. conceived the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Sichuan Potato Innovation Team Programme of the Chinese Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System (Grant No. sccxtd−2023−09) and the Biological Breeding Project (Grant No. SKL−ZY202203) of the State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Exploration and Utilization in Southwest China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable. This work did not involve the use of any animal or human data or tissue.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Han, X.; Yang, R.; Zhang, L.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y. A Review of Potato Salt Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, H.; Fen, X.; Yu, W.; Hu, H.H.; Dai, X.F. Progress of potato staple food research and industry development in China. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 2924–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, Y.; Rashid, M.A.R.; Li, X.; Yao, C.; Lu, L.; Bai, J.; Li, Y.; Xu, N.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, L.; et al. Collection and evaluation of genetic diversity and population structure of potato landraces and varieties in China. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Campbell, M.A.; Suttle, J.C.; Sell, T.W. Changes in cell cycle status and expression of p34cdc2 kinase during potato tuber meristem dormancy. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 98, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sonnewald, S.; Sonnewald, U. Regulation of potato tuber sprouting. Planta 2014, 239, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Haider, M.W.; Nafees, M.; Ahmad, I.; Ali, B.; Maryam, I.R.; Vodnar, D.C.; Marc, R.A.; Kamran, M.; Saleem, M.H.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; et al. Postharvest dormancy-related changes of endogenous hormones in relation to different dormancy-breaking methods of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 945256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, R.C.; Zhang, H.J.; Wang, Q.; Guo, Y.D. Regulatory mechanism of plant hormones on seed dormancy and germination (Review). Acta. Agreatia. Sin. 2012, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hartmann, A.; Senning, M.; Hedden, P.; Sonnewald, U.; Sonnewald, S. Reactivation of meristem activity and sprout growth in potato tubers require both cytokinin and gibberellin. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 776–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Malhotra, K.; Agarwal, S.; Pattanayak, D.; Minhas, J.S. Post-transcriptional silencing of Ga20ox1 in potato. Potato J. 2013, 32, 276–284. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, Z.; Ma, R.; Zhao, M.; Wang, F.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. NO and ABA interaction regulates tuber dormancy and sprouting in potato. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nolan, T.M.; Vukašinović, N.; Liu, D.; Russinova, E.; Yin, Y. Brassinosteroids: Multidimensional Regulators of Plant Growth, Development, and Stress Responses. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 295–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fariduddin, Q.; Yusuf, M.; Ahmad, I.; Ahmad, A. Brassinosteroids and their role in response of plants to abiotic stresses. Biol. Plant. 2014, 58, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, W.J.; Chen, F.; Li, P.P.; Chen, Y.M.; Chen, M.; Yang, Q. Identification and Characterization of Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis and Signaling Pathway Genes in Solanum tuberosum. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 66, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, L.; Deng, M.; Lyu, C.; Zhang, J.; Peng, J.; Cai, C.; Yang, S.; Lu, L.; Ni, S.; Liu, F.; et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics analysis reveals that protein modification and sugar metabolism contribute to sprouting in potato after BR treatment. Food Chem. 2020, 325, 126875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, J.; Nam, K.H.; Vafeados, D.; Chory, J. BIN2, a new brassinosteroid-insensitive locus in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, H.; Tang, J.; Liu, J.; Hu, J.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Cai, Z.; Wang, X. Abscisic acid signaling inhibits brassinosteroid signaling through dampening the dephosphorylation of BIN2 by ABI1 and ABI2. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, Y.; Yu, D. Brassinosteroid insensitive 2 interacts with Abscisic acid insensitive 5 to mediate the antagonism of brassinosteroids to abscisic acid during seed germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 4394–4408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, S.F.; Cai, C.C.; Li, L.P.; Wen, H.; Liu, J.; Li, L.Q.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.Y. StSN2 interacts with the brassinosteroid signaling suppressor StBIN2 to maintain tuber dormancy. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, J.; Cai, C.; Liu, S.; Li, L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X. StBIN2 Positively Regulates Potato Formation through Hormone and Sugar Signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alejandro, S.; Lee, Y.; Tohge, T.; Sudre, D.; Osorio, S.; Park, J.; Bovet, L.; Lee, Y.; Geldner, N.; Fernie, A.R.; et al. AtABCG29 is a monolignol transporter involved in lignin biosynthesis. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 1207–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ran, X.; Wan, H.; Li, J.; Liang, Y.; Xu, J. An investigation of the relationship between lignin content and seed coat traits in yellow–seeded Brassica napus L. Academia J. Agric. Res. 2015, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pierce, S.; Spada, A.; Caporali, E.; Ceriani, R.M.; Buffa, G. Enzymatic scarification of Anacamptis morio (Orchidaceae) seed facilitates lignin degradation, water uptake and germination. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, R.; Lu, J.; Xing, J.; Du, M.; Wang, M.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Y. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses revealing the potential mechanism of seed germination in Polygonatum cyrtonema. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liang, M.; Davis, E.; Gardner, D.; Cai, X.; Wu, Y. Involvement of AtLAC15 in lignin synthesis in seeds and in root elongation of Arabidopsis. Planta 2006, 224, 1185–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Renard, J.; Martínez-Almonacid, I.; Sonntag, A.; Molina, I.; Moya-Cuevas, J.; Bissoli, G.; Muñoz-Bertomeu, J.; Faus, I.; Niñoles, R.; Shigeto, J.; et al. PRX2 and PRX25, peroxidases regulated by COG1, are involved in seed longevity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Serra, O.; Hohn, C.; Franke, R.; Prat, S.; Molinas, M.; Figueras, M. A feruloyl transferase involved in the biosynthesis of suberin and suberin-associated wax is required for maturation and sealing properties of potato periderm. Plant J. 2010, 62, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Deng, M.; Peng, J.; Zhang, J.; Ran, S.; Cai, C.; Yu, L.; Ni, S.; Huang, X.; Li, L.; Wang, X. The Cysteine-Rich Peptide Snakin-2 Negatively Regulates Tubers Sprouting through Modulating Lignin Biosynthesis and H2O2 Accumulation in Potato. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Vulavala, V.K.; Fogelman, E.; Faigenboim, A.; Shoseyov, O.; Ginzberg, I. The transcriptome of potato tuber phellogen reveals cellular functions of cork cambium and genes involved in periderm formation and maturation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Z.; Gerstein, M.; Snyder, M. RNA-Seq: A revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lau, K.H.; Del, R.H.M.; Crisovan, E.; Wu, S.; Fei, Z.; Khan, M.A.; Buell, C.R.; Gemenet, D.C. Transcriptomic analysis of sweet potato under dehydration stress identifies candidate genes for drought tolerance. Plant Direct 2018, 2, e00092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, S.; Yu, X.; Lei, N.; Cheng, Z.; Zhao, P.; He, Y.; Wang, W.; Peng, M. Genome-wide identification and functional prediction of cold and/or drought-responsive lncRNAs in cassava. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, D.; Su, M.; Hao, J.H.; Li, Z.D.; Dong, S.; Yuan, Y.X.; Li, X.R.; Gao, L.L.; Chu, X.Q.; Yang, G.R.; et al. Dynamic transcriptome landscape of foxtail millet grain development. Seed Biol. 2023, 2, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, L.Q.; Zou, X.; Deng, M.S.; Peng, J.; Huang, X.L.; Lu, X.; Fang, C.C.; Wang, X.Y. Comparative morphology, transcription, and proteomics study revealing the key molecular mechanism of camphor on the potato tuber sprouting effect. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Destefano–Beltrán, L.; Knauber, D.; Huckle, L.; Suttle, J. Chemically forced dormancy termination mimics natural dormancy progression in potato tuber meristems by reducing ABA content and modifying expression of genes involved in regulating ABA synthesis and metabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 2879–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Quiroga, M.; Guerrero, C.; Botella, M.A.; Barceló, A.; Amaya, I.; Medina, M.I.; Alonso, F.J.; Forchetti, S.M.; Tigier, H.; Valpuesta, V. A tomato peroxidase involved in the synthesis of lignin and suberin. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, X.; Wei, J.; Wu, J.; Shi, B.; Wang, P.; Alabd, A.; Wang, D.; Gao, Y.; Ni, J.; Bai, S.; et al. Transcription factors BZR2/MYC2 modulate brassinosteroid and jasmonic acid crosstalk during pear dormancy. Plant Physiol 2023, kiad633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hou, J.; Liu, T.; Reid, S.; Zhang, H.; Peng, X.; Sun, K.; Du, J.; Sonnewald, U.; Song, B. Silencing of α-amylase StAmy23 in potato tuber leads to delayed sprouting. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 139, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hashemi, K.D.; Azizi, H. A review of protein-protein interaction and signaling pathway of vimentin in cell regulation, morphology and cell differentiation in normal cells. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. 2022, 42, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Khan, M.; Luo, B.; Hu, M.; Fu, S.; Liu, J.; Jiang, M.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, X. Brassinosteroid Signaling Downstream Suppressor BIN2 Interacts with SLFRIGIDA–LIKE to Induce Early Flowering in Tomato. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cai, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Yang, C.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Pan, S.; Dong, R.; Tang, G.; Barajas-Lopez, J.D.; et al. GSK3-like kinases positively modulate abscisic acid signaling through phosphorylating subgroup III SnRK2s in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 9651–9656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ju, L.; Dong, H.; Yang, R.; Jing, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, K.M.; Ping, J.; Sun, J. BIN2 phosphorylates the Thr280 of CO to restrict its function in promoting Arabidopsis flowering. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1068949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chinnusamy, V.; Ohta, M.; Kanrar, S.; Lee, B.H.; Hong, X.; Agarwal, M.; Zhu, J.K. ICE1: A regulator of cold–induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1043–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Qiu, Y.M.; Guo, J.; Jiang, W.Z.; Ding, J.H.; Song, R.F.; Zhang, J.L.; Huang, X.; Yuan, H.M. HbBIN2 Functions in Plant Cold Stress Resistance through Modulation of HbICE1 Transcriptional Activity and ROS Homeostasis in Hevea brasiliensis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Song, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Li, L.; Yang, Z.; Ge, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Li, F.; Ren, M. BIN2 negatively regulates plant defence against Verticillium dahliae in Arabidopsis and cotton. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 2097–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yan, Y.; Wen, Z.; Wang, X.; Huang, S.Y. Addressing recent docking challenges: A hybrid strategy to integrate template–based and free protein–protein docking. Proteins 2017, 85, 497–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xiong, M.; Yu, J.; Wang, J.; Gao, Q.; Huang, L.; Chen, C.; Zhang, C.; Fan, X.; Zhao, D.; Liu, Q.Q.; et al. Brassinosteroids regulate rice seed germination through the BZR1–RAmy3D transcriptional module. Plant Physiol. 2022, 189, 402–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Novak, S.; Kalbakji, N.; Upthegrove, K.; Neher, W.; Jones, J.; León, J. Evidence for Brassinosteroid–Mediated PAT During Germination of Spathoglottis plicata (Orchidaceae). Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hasan, M.M.; Liu, X.D.; Waseem, M.; Guang, Q.Y.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Jahan, M.S.; Fang, X.W. ABA activated SnRK2 kinases: An emerging role in plant growth and physiology. Plant Signal. Behav. 2022, 17, 2071024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Marinov, O.; Nomberg, G.; Sarkar, S.; Arya, G.C.; Karavani, E.; Zelinger, E.; Manasherova, E.; Cohen, H. Microscopic and metabolic investigations disclose the factors that lead to skin cracking in chili–type pepper fruit varieties. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, X.Y.; Li, J.; Zou, X.; Lu, L.M.; Li, L.Q.; Ni, S.; Liu, F. Ectopic expression of AtCIPK23 enhances tolerance against Low–K+ stress in transgenic potato. Am. J. Potato Res. 2011, 88, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Young, M.D.; Wakefield, M.J.; Smyth, G.K.; Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA–seq: Accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zoabi, Y.; Shomron, N. Processing and Analysis of RNA-seq Data from Public Resources. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2243, 81–94. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. BR promotes potato tuber sprouts. (A) Germination of tubers at different stages after BR treatment. (B) The length of potato sprouts after 45 days of BR treatment. (C) Potato tuber germination rate. CK represents distilled water treatment, and d represents the number of days processed. Tubers were stored at 20 °C in the dark prior to being analyzed. Data are the means ± SD of three biological replicates. Different small letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. BR promotes potato tuber sprouts. (A) Germination of tubers at different stages after BR treatment. (B) The length of potato sprouts after 45 days of BR treatment. (C) Potato tuber germination rate. CK represents distilled water treatment, and d represents the number of days processed. Tubers were stored at 20 °C in the dark prior to being analyzed. Data are the means ± SD of three biological replicates. Different small letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 02244 g001
Figure 2. qPCR detection of the key genes involved in the BR signaling pathway during tuber storage. (A) Expression of the StBIN2 gene. (B) Expression of the StBZR1 gene. (C) Expression of the StBR1 gene. (D) Expression of the StBSU1 gene. CK represents distilled water treatment, and d represents the number of days processed. Tubers were stored at 20 °C in the dark for 70 days prior to being analyzed. Data are the means ± SD of three biological replicates. Different small letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. qPCR detection of the key genes involved in the BR signaling pathway during tuber storage. (A) Expression of the StBIN2 gene. (B) Expression of the StBZR1 gene. (C) Expression of the StBR1 gene. (D) Expression of the StBSU1 gene. CK represents distilled water treatment, and d represents the number of days processed. Tubers were stored at 20 °C in the dark for 70 days prior to being analyzed. Data are the means ± SD of three biological replicates. Different small letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 02244 g002
Figure 3. StBIN2 maintains tuber dormancy. (A) qPCR detection of StBIN2 gene expression in WT, OE-StBIN2, and RNAi-StBIN2. (B) Sprout length of WT, OE-StBIN2, and RNAi-StBIN2. (C) The potato tuber phenotype is stored for 60 days. (D) Germination rate of potato tubers. d represents the number of days processed. Tubers were stored at 20 °C in the dark prior to being analyzed. Data are the means ± SD of three biological replicates. Different small letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. StBIN2 maintains tuber dormancy. (A) qPCR detection of StBIN2 gene expression in WT, OE-StBIN2, and RNAi-StBIN2. (B) Sprout length of WT, OE-StBIN2, and RNAi-StBIN2. (C) The potato tuber phenotype is stored for 60 days. (D) Germination rate of potato tubers. d represents the number of days processed. Tubers were stored at 20 °C in the dark prior to being analyzed. Data are the means ± SD of three biological replicates. Different small letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 02244 g003
Figure 4. Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (A,B) Volcano plot showing the DEGs revealed via RNA-seq analysis. Red, green, and black dots represent upregulated, downregulated, and insignificant DEGs, respectively. (C) Statistics on the number of differentially expressed genes. (D) The genes that are identified in both the B vs WT and R vs WT comparisons, as indicated by their intersection, are those that are common to both comparisons. B represents OE-StBIN2, R represents RNAi-StBIN2, and WT represents wild-type.
Figure 4. Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (A,B) Volcano plot showing the DEGs revealed via RNA-seq analysis. Red, green, and black dots represent upregulated, downregulated, and insignificant DEGs, respectively. (C) Statistics on the number of differentially expressed genes. (D) The genes that are identified in both the B vs WT and R vs WT comparisons, as indicated by their intersection, are those that are common to both comparisons. B represents OE-StBIN2, R represents RNAi-StBIN2, and WT represents wild-type.
Ijms 25 02244 g004
Figure 5. GO enrichment analysis of B vs W and R vs W genes. The vertical axis represents different biological processes, and the horizontal axis represents the number of genes enriched. B represents OE-StBIN2, R represents RNAi-StBIN2, and W represents wild-type.
Figure 5. GO enrichment analysis of B vs W and R vs W genes. The vertical axis represents different biological processes, and the horizontal axis represents the number of genes enriched. B represents OE-StBIN2, R represents RNAi-StBIN2, and W represents wild-type.
Ijms 25 02244 g005
Figure 6. qPCR detection of genes in different tubers stored for 45 days. (A) The expression level of StSnRK2.2. (B) The expression level of StABI3. (C) The expression level of StABI5. (D) The expression level of StBZIP. (E) The expression level of StBIN2. (F) The expression level of StBZR1. (G) The expression level of StDWF. (H) The expression level of StPOD. (I) The expression level of StCCJ9. Tubers were stored at 20 °C in the dark prior to being analyzed. B represents OE-StBIN2, R represents RNAi-StBIN2, and W represents wild-type. Data are the means ± SD of three biological replicates. Different small letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. qPCR detection of genes in different tubers stored for 45 days. (A) The expression level of StSnRK2.2. (B) The expression level of StABI3. (C) The expression level of StABI5. (D) The expression level of StBZIP. (E) The expression level of StBIN2. (F) The expression level of StBZR1. (G) The expression level of StDWF. (H) The expression level of StPOD. (I) The expression level of StCCJ9. Tubers were stored at 20 °C in the dark prior to being analyzed. B represents OE-StBIN2, R represents RNAi-StBIN2, and W represents wild-type. Data are the means ± SD of three biological replicates. Different small letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 02244 g006
Figure 7. Verification of interaction between StBIN2 and StCCJ9, StSnRK2.2. (A) Y2H-AOS analysis of the interaction between StBIN2 and StCCJ9. Light blue represents StBIN2 protein, green represents StCCJ9 protein. (B) Y2H-AOS analysis of the interaction between StBIN2 and StSnrk2.2. Light blue represents StBIN2 protein, green represents StSnrk2.2 protein. (C) Verification of dual luciferase interaction. The area shaded in red indicates interaction. (D) LUC enzyme activity detection. Data are the means ± SD of three biological replicates. Different small letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Verification of interaction between StBIN2 and StCCJ9, StSnRK2.2. (A) Y2H-AOS analysis of the interaction between StBIN2 and StCCJ9. Light blue represents StBIN2 protein, green represents StCCJ9 protein. (B) Y2H-AOS analysis of the interaction between StBIN2 and StSnrk2.2. Light blue represents StBIN2 protein, green represents StSnrk2.2 protein. (C) Verification of dual luciferase interaction. The area shaded in red indicates interaction. (D) LUC enzyme activity detection. Data are the means ± SD of three biological replicates. Different small letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 02244 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Cai, C.; Li, L.; Yu, L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanisms of BR Negative Regulatory Factor StBIN2 Maintaining Tuber Dormancy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2244. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042244

AMA Style

Liu S, Cai C, Li L, Yu L, Wang Q, Wang X. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanisms of BR Negative Regulatory Factor StBIN2 Maintaining Tuber Dormancy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(4):2244. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042244

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Shifeng, Chengcheng Cai, Liqin Li, Liping Yu, Qiang Wang, and Xiyao Wang. 2024. "Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanisms of BR Negative Regulatory Factor StBIN2 Maintaining Tuber Dormancy" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 4: 2244. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042244

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop