Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Alterations to Hepatic MicroRNA-29a in Response to Long-Term High-Fat Diet and EtOH Feeding
Next Article in Special Issue
RNF138 Downregulates Antiviral Innate Immunity by Inhibiting IRF3 Activation
Previous Article in Journal
Turmeric and Curcumin—Health-Promoting Properties in Humans versus Dogs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immune Activation and Inflammatory Response Mediated by the NOD/Toll-like Receptor Signaling Pathway—The Potential Mechanism of Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeiana) Meningitis Caused by Elizabethkingia miricola
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(19), 14562; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914562
by Parnian Jamshidi 1,†, Yeganeh Farsi 2, Zahra Nariman 3,†, Mohammad Reza Hatamnejad 4, Benyamin Mohammadzadeh 1, Hossein Akbarialiabad 5,6, Mohammad Javad Nasiri 1,* and Leonardo A. Sechi 7,8,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(19), 14562; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914562
Submission received: 26 July 2023 / Revised: 5 September 2023 / Accepted: 15 September 2023 / Published: 26 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Immunology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thanks to Jamshidi et al. submission of a manuscript entitled “Fecal microbiota transplantation in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”, this review synthesizes current research findings and ascertains the effectiveness of FMT in relieving symptoms in IBS patients. Authors find that lower GI administration of a single dose of multiple donor FMT significantly alleviates patient complaints compared with the autologous FMT used as the placebo. The research method used by authors was reliable, and the research results were of great significance for effectively alleviating the symptoms of IBS patients.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you very much for your positive feedback on our manuscript. It's our pleasure.

Wish you all the best,

Parnian Jamshidi

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf


Author Response

Dear reviewer,

First and foremost, I'd like to express my profound gratitude for your comprehensive review of our manuscript. We have carefully edited the manuscript as you requested and provided a point-by-point response attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Jamshidi et al conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)  on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. The review involved a thorough search of PubMed/Medline and Embase databases, identifying seven studies that met the inclusion criteria. The study distinguishes itself from previous research by including the most recent relevant trials, considering both invasive and non-invasive administration routes for FMT, and accounting for differences in IBS diagnosis criteria. Their meta-analysis demonstrated no efficacy of FMT in the IBS treatment. Additionally, the text delves into the role of the gut microbiome in IBS and discusses dysbiosis (imbalance in the gut bacterial profile) as a crucial factor. The potential benefits and controversies surrounding FMT and its mechanisms are explored, including its impact on the gut-brain axis and the effects of different FMT administration routes and dosages. This review paper looks good to me. I only have some minor comments.

 

Minor comments:

1.     Lines 29: “From 1015 identified studies” -> “Among 1015 identified studies”

2.     Line 133: “In the primary search in mentioned databases” -> “In the primary search in the mentioned databases”

3.     Line 257: “IBS patients have low diversity and richness” -> “IBS patients have lower diversity and richness”

4.     Line 325: “Hence, the trend towards” -> “Hence, the trend toward”

The grammar looks good to me. I only have some grammatical suggestions included above.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you very much for your thoughtful comments. We have carefully edited the manuscript as you requested.

Back to TopTop