Next Article in Journal
Intraarticular Injections of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review of Their Current Molecular Mechanisms of Action and Their Efficacy
Next Article in Special Issue
COP1 Mediates Dark-Induced Stomatal Closure by Suppressing FT, TSF and SOC1 Expression to Promote NO Accumulation in Arabidopsis Guard Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Phosphorylation of Kapok Fiber with Phytic Acid for Enhanced Flame Retardancy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nitric Oxide Metabolic Pathway in Drought-Stressed Nodules of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nitric Oxide in Seed Biology

Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(23), 14951; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314951
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 25 November 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nitric Oxide Signalling and Metabolism in Plants)

Abstract

:
Nitric oxide (NO) has been recognized as a gasotransmitter in the mainstream of plant research since the beginning of the 21st century. It is produced in plant tissue and the environment. It influences plant physiology during every ontogenetic stage from seed germination to plant senescence. In this review, we demonstrate the increased interest in NO as a regulatory molecule in combination with other signalling molecules and phytohormones in the information network of plant cells. This work is a summary of the current knowledge on NO action in seeds, starting from seed pretreatment techniques applied to increase seed quality. We describe mode of action of NO in the regulation of seed dormancy, germination, and aging. During each stage of seed physiology, NO appears to act as a key agent with a predominantly beneficial effect.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

1.1. Historical View of NO Plant-Related Literature

Many papers have emphasized the role of various gasotransmitters in plant ontogenesis and reaction to environmental stresses [1,2]. A prominent group of these compounds is reactive nitrogen species (RNS), the most frequently studied of which is nitric oxide (NO).
Since the late 1950s, more than 15,000 scientific articles related to RNS action or detection in various plant materials are listed in the Web of Science database. Most of this research concerned the use of plant tissue extracts (including seed extracts) in the analysis of NO metabolism in animal models. Among these publications, 37% are related to plant science, 18% to biochemistry and molecular biology, and 11% to pharmacology and pharmacy (according to Web of Science Categories, Table S1).
In plant science, the first mention of the use of NO in the literature appeared in 1959 (Figure 1) in a paper describing the influence of exogenous NO on creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) seeds in response to radiation [3]. However, since its publication, there has been no particular increase in interest in the role of RNS in the regulation of plant growth and development (Figure 1). The first breakthrough research on NO formation in plant cells was published by Klepper [4] and referred to the release of NO from herbicide-treated soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) leaves. Since the 1990s, there has been a gradual increase in the number of publications on metabolism and the signalling role of NO in plant biology (Figure 1). Then, an inventive paper by Delledonne et al. was published in Nature [5] about the role of NO in plant disease resistance, which has a current citation index of ca. 1350 (according to a search performed on 13 October 2022). In the same year, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded for research on NO as a signalling molecule in the cardiovascular system [6].
Between 1900 and 2021, an analysis of studies reporting on NO and seeds in the Web of Science database showed a total of 3300 records (Figure 2), with the first record in 1959. Most records are related to plant sciences (29%), biochemistry and molecular biology (17%), pharmacology and pharmacy (11%), and food science technology (9%). According to the query used (details in Table S2), the analysis showed that the first article on the impact of NO on seed germination was published by Giba et al. [7]. However previously, despite the use of NO donors, the role of NO in the regulation of seed biology had not been underlined. Therefore, the applied query ((ALL = (“seed” OR “seeds”)) AND ALL = (“reactive + nitrogen + species” OR “RNS” OR “nitrosative + stress” OR “nitric + oxide”)) did not return such studies. An example is a paper published in 1990 that concerned the germination of princess tree (Paulownia tomentosa (Steud.)) seeds. The authors demonstrated that after using 10 mM KNO3 (as a NO donor), a single red-light pulse was sufficient to induce seed germination [8]. Not only the direct treatment of seeds with NO donors but also the fertilization of the mother plant with nitrogen influences the germination of the seeds [9]. On the other hand, atmospheric NO of various origins seems to be important for the regulation of seed biology [10].

1.2. NO Sources in Seeds and NO Donors Used in Laboratory Practice

A molecule of NO consists of nitrogen and oxygen atoms. Owing to the presence of unpaired electrons in NO radical form, it exerts a high reactivity. The biochemistry of NO is also linked to the formation of nitrosonium cations (NO+) and nitroxyl anions(NO). NO reacts with molecules that also possess unpaired orbital electrons or transition metal ions. When it is converted to other RNS, it may react with nucleic acid, proteins, and lipids. Easy diffusion through membranes supports its reactivity [11].
Since early research on the role of NO in plants, the biosynthesis of this gaseous molecule has been at the centre of attention. NO is produced in plants via many enzymatic and nonenzymatic pathways, the functioning of which depends on plant tissue, developmental stage, and environmental factors. The list of NO biosynthesis pathways is not exhaustive, and the activity of some of them remains the topic of active discussion [12,13,14,15].
Although the pathways of NO biosynthesis in seeds have been the subject of investigation for years, many questions remain to be answered. Understanding this phenomenon thoroughly is challenging due to the alternation in oxygen levels in the tissue during seed germination (imbibition). The first information on this subject was published in 2004. Then, the non-enzymatic reduction of nitrite (NO2) to NO was demonstrated in the apoplast of the aleurone layers of germinating barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) caryopsis [16]. Moreover, nitrate reductase (NR)-dependent NO formation was confirmed in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) seeds [17]. Other NO producers in seeds include mitochondria [18]. NO generation in the reaction catalysed by NR or in mitochondria requires a low oxygen concentration, representing a potential source of this compound in the early stages of seed germination when oxygen depletion occurs [19]. As a result of limited oxygen access, the oxidative pathways (via nitric oxide synthase-like activity or hydroxylamine oxidation) of NO biosynthesis are unlikely to be active at the onset of germination. However, after loosening the seed coat or during radical protrusion, these routes could be predominant [20].
For years, the question has been raised as to the importance of endogenous NO in the regulation of seed dormancy and germination, as well as the importance of the operation of external sources of this gas transmission. Gupta et al. [21] presented a list of the most commonly used NO donors, which is reproduced in Table 1. Some NO donors such as sodium nitroprusside (SNP), one of the cheapest NO sources, are very controversial [22].

2. Seed Priming or Presoaking with SNP Used as NO Donor Increases Seed Germination and Seedling Tolerance to Various Stresses

Seed priming techniques are used to increase seed vigour and germination and decrease seedlings’ susceptibility to various environmental stresses. Thus, diverse techniques of seed priming are commonly used by seed companies worldwide as promising methods to increase crop productivity under inconvenient environmental conditions. Priming seems to act as a treatment that activates a kind of “cellular memory” that allows developing seedlings to become more tolerant to stressors [34]. Generally, seed priming is defined as “pre-germination hydration” that induces various physiological, biochemical, and molecular events leading to the accomplishment of germination under favourable moisture conditions and the formation of properly formed, healthy seedlings. This technique is based on controlled seed hydration sufficient to permit pregerminative metabolic events to proceed but insufficient to allow for radicle protrusion. After priming, seeds are dried back to their initial water content and can be stored and/or sown via conventional techniques [35]. As the impact of NO on the increased tolerance of seedlings or plants to stresses has been proven by many authors [36,37,38], some NO donors (predominantly SNP) were tested using priming techniques. NO donors are used separately or in combination with other molecules belonging to, e.g., reactive oxygen species (ROS). Habib et al. [39] used 100 µM SNP separately or in combination with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to test the beneficial effect of these two molecules on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under water deficit conditions. Combined H2O2 and SNP soaking of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) seeds resulted in effective protection against salt (NaCl) stress [40]. A presowing exposure of seeds to a magnetic field resulted in enhanced germination and emergence [41], and Patel et al. [42] demonstrated that SNP (100–500 µM) enhanced germination and vigour of magnetoprimed maize (Zea mays L.) seeds.
Many researchers have tested SNP using seed presoaking techniques to increase the seed germinability, vigour, and resistance of developing seedlings to stressors, particularly unfavourable environmental conditions. SNP (10–100 µM) was used as a priming factor to improve wheat seedling tolerance to chilling stress [43]. Soaking of seeds of two rapeseed cultivars (differing in susceptibility toward stresses) in SNP increased seed germination parameters under low-temperature and drought conditions [44]. Carrot (Daucus carota L.) seeds subjected to water deficit germinated better after the application of 100–300 µM SNP [45]. Similarly, soaking of Cynanchum bungei Decne seeds in SNP accelerated seed germination and increased germination and vigour under salinity [46]. Priming of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seeds in SNP had a beneficial effect on copper toxicity, although no effect of SNP was observed under non-stressed conditions [47]. In Indian mustard (Brassica junea L.) seeds, pretreatment with 100 µM SNP increased germinability in excess copper [48]. The protective action of SNP was also demonstrated in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) seeds exposed to cadmium [49]. Wheat seeds of seven different genotypes primed with 10 or 100 µM SNP germinated well at low temperatures [43]. An induction of chilling tolerance was observed in seeds of another wheat genotype and young seedlings after presoaking of caryopsis with 100 µM SNP [50]. Increased low-temperature tolerance was also reported for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seeds after priming with 200 µM SNP [51]. Priming of Brachiaria grass (Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R. Webster) seeds with SNP (100 µM) induced protective action against water restriction and salinity [52]. In some reports, authors confirmed the positive action of NO after using SNP solution by applying a NO scavenger (2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3 oxide; cPTIO), an inhibitor of NO synthase (L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester), an inhibitor of NR (sodium tungstate), or methylene blue, which is regarded as a blocker of NO action [42,51,53]. Most of these reports share a common mechanism of NO action: increased α-amylase and ß-amylase activity, enhanced starch degradation leading to increased carbohydrate concentration, and activation of the enzymatic cellular antioxidant system [42,44,49,51,54]. A summary of experimentally confirmed events occurring in seeds after priming or presoaking in the presence of SNP used as a NO donor is shown in Figure 3.
Some examples of the potential application and perspectives of the utilization of various NO donors in agriculture were recently reviewed [55,56,57]. Tests of SNP presoaking of seeds of common crops, such as sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. subsp. pekinensis), and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), pointed to the effectiveness of this chemical for seed quality improvement [58].
All data on the application of SNP as a priming agent or presoaking solution have to be analysed in the context of the current knowledge on the use of SNP as a NO donor. It is debatable whether SNP can be considered a NO donor only [22,59,60,61]. SNP releases a substantial amount of cyanide and iron; thus, its use in NO research as a NO donor is doubtful [61]. Furthermore, in most cited papers referring to seed priming or presoaking with SNP, no detailed information was included on the light conditions of SNP treatment. Taking into account that SNP in aqueous solution was degraded when exposed to white or blue light but not to red light or in darkness [62], the effect of SNP but not strictly NO should be considered, and the results of cited reports should be interpreted with caution. However, the possibility of the use of SNP as a NO donor for seed quality improvement by priming and presoaking is still promising. Recently, gas priming with acidified KNO2 was proposed as a novel treatment for air-dried seeds in research on dormancy release and seed germination [63]. As these chemicals (SNP and KNO2) are relatively inexpensive, they have a putative potential for such applications. Such treated seeds should not be stored for a long time but be quickly distributed for seedlings production. Detailed studies on a large scale for a larger batch of seeds should be performed before commercialisation.

3. NO-Phytohormone Network in Seed Dormancy and Germination

Seed germination includes events preceding cell growth and differentiation, starting from seed imbibition and leading to the induction of elongation growth of the embryonic axis [64]. The beginning of growth, manifested by the breakage of the seed coat by the embryonic axis, indicates the end of germination and the beginning of seedling growth. However, not all viable seeds separated from the mother plant germinate successfully, owing to seed dormancy, which is the physiological state resulting from the genotypic properties of the seeds and/or environmental factors disrupting germination [64].
Various NO donors have been shown to reverse dormancy and stimulate seed germination in many plant species [65,66]. Most seeds, whose dormancy is reversed by the use of NO donors exhibit physiological dormancy associated with an imbalance between stimulators and inhibitors of germination. This type of dormancy is alleviated by NO in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) embryos, redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana L.) Heynh.), barley, empress tree (Paulownia elongata S.Y.Hu), and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) seeds [53,67,68,69,70,71]. NO-dependent removal of secondary dormancy (resulting from unfavourable environmental conditions) of wild cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) was also reported [72]. The influence of various donors of NO on the thermodormancy and photodormancy of lettuce (cv. ‘Jianye Xianfeng No. 1′) seeds was reported by Deng and Song [73]. Bethke et al. [67,68,74] used an experimental model in which the seeds of Arabidopsis germinated in the presence of vapours released from an aqueous solution of SNP. They observed that cPTIO strengthened the dormancy of Arabidopsis seeds but did not impact the dormancy of non-dormant seeds [67]. The positive impact of SNP on germination was reported for chickweed (Stellaria media (L.) Vill) seeds [75]. SNP (10 to 400 µM) also increased the germination of flixweed (Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb ex Prantl) seeds [76]. The use of an SNP solution (0.1–800 µM) resulted in a stimulating effect on the germination of yellow lupine (Lupinus luteus L.) seeds and decreased their sensitivity to heavy metals (lead and cadmium), as well as salinity [77]. Similarly, SNP (50 and 200 µM) stimulated the germination of Suaeda salsa (L.) Pall. seeds under salinity [78] and the germination of tomato seeds under osmotic stress [79]. Seed germination of grasses such as millet (Panicum virgatum L.), big bluestem grass (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), and yellow Indian grass (Sorgastrum nutans L. Nash) was stimulated by 200 µM SNP [69]. This effect was reversed by 200 µM PTIO. Furthermore, NO was reported to be released as a result of the acidification of NO2, with a much better effect than SNP on the seed germination of various plant species [69].
The mechanism of NO action in seed dormancy removal is connected to the regulation of phytohormone content and signalling (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5). Abscisic acid (ABA) is responsible for dormancy induction and maintenance [66]. A decrease in ABA content was detected after NO application in freshly harvested Arabidopsis seeds or dormant wild cabbage seeds [72,80]. The triple-mutation nia1nia2noa1 manifested by a deficiency in NO generation was related to delayed germination, as well as seed hypersensitivity to ABA during the germination and early seedling development stages [81]. Moreover, the treatment of dormant apple embryos with SNP under light conditions resulted in a decrease in embryo sensitivity to exogenous ABA [70,82]. For dormant tissue (apple embryos or non-after-ripened hedge mustard (Sisymbrium officinale (L.) Scop.) seeds), NO impacted ABA levels via downregulation of NCED gene expression (related to ABA biosynthesis) [83,84]. Generally, NO-dependent stimulation of seed germination of dormant or nondormant seeds/embryos is associated with an upregulation of CYP7072A transcript levels (related to ABA degradation) (Table 2). Research performed on Arabidopsis seeds revealed that an increase in CYP707A2 expression by NO3- requires the presence of NIN-like protein 8, which directly binds to the promoter of the gene and ultimately reduces the ABA level [85]. Moreover, NO initiates post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins of the ABA biosynthesis and signal transduction pathways (via S-nitrosation or nitration), disturbing the accumulation and mode of action of this phytohormone, reviewed in detail in [86]. ABA signalling is also downregulated by NO-mediated degradation of VII ethylene response transcription factor (ERFVII), a positive regulator of ABI5 (the element of ABA signal transduction), via the N-end rule pathway of proteolysis [86,87].
A genome-wide association study of barley genotypes revealed that NO release (highly abundant in non-dormant genotypes) was associated with GA2ox4, GA20ox3, and GA20ox1, which played a key role in gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis [90]. This phytohormone regulates the loss of seed dormancy and promotes seed germination [86]. The conversion of inactive forms of GAs to active forms requires the presence of GA 3-oxidase (GA3ox). On the other hand, GA 2-oxidase (GA2ox) is responsible for GA deactivation. In hedge mustard seeds [83,88], NO promoted the germination of after-ripened and non-after-ripened seeds through transcriptional changes of various genes of GA metabolism. The simultaneous application of KCN (dormancy-removing agent) and cPTIO decreased the GA3ox levels in Arabidopsis seeds (compared to the effect obtained with HCN only) (Table 3), confirming the role of NO in the regulation of gene expression of GA biosynthesis [91]. NO may also influence GA signalling through a decrease in the RGL2 transcript level, as detected for hedge mustard seeds, irrespective of the depth of dormancy [83,88]. As this gene encodes a protein belonging to the DELLA family [86], a repressor of the GA transduction pathway, NO may promote the expression of genes induced by GA.
The mechanism of ethylene (ET) action and its cooperation with NO during dormancy alleviation and seed germination is less elaborated. Pretreatment with NO (acidified KNO2) followed by ET application increased the germination of redroot pigweed seed by 30% [71]. In the same research, a stimulatory effect of NO and aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC, the precursor of ET) on germination was associated with increased ET levels before radicle protrusion. Similarly, when the culture of NO-treated apple embryos was prolonged, a gradual increase in ET emission was detected [82]. The stimulation of ET production in wild cabbage seeds after NO treatment was related to an increase in the expression of genes encoding proteins involved in its biosynthesis (ACC synthase and oxidase) and signalling (ethylene receptor) (Table 4) [72]. The positive effect of NO application on seed dormancy removal of wild cabbage was disrupted after the use of 2,5-norbornadiene, an ET binding inhibitor. The link between NO, ET, and polyamines (PAs) in the regulation of apple embryo germination was mentioned by Krasuska et al. [92].
Various effects of jasmonates (JA) on the germination of seeds of many species were detected in [93]. JA stimulated the germination of dormant apple embryos [94] but inhibited the germination of non-dormant embryos. A fluctuation in JA content was observed in apple embryos during dormancy removal by cold stratification [95]. Only a few reports have indicated the interaction of JA and NO in seed biology. In axes of apple embryos, NO treatment increased the transcript level of AOS (related to JA biosynthesis) and decreased the transcript level of JAZ3 (a negative regulator of JA signalling) (Table 5), suggesting the stimulation of JA production and the induction of the transduction pathway of this phytohormone [84]. Similarly, the results of the expression of genes related to the formation of JA derivatives indicate that the NO-induced transition of apple embryos from a dormant to non-dormant state was accompanied by the formation of methyl jasmonate (MeJa; upregulation of JMT) rather than JA-isoleucine synthesis (downregulation of JAR1) (Table 5). Jacobsen et al. [93] confirmed the importance of NO–JA interactions in seeds, reporting that MeJa reversed the inhibitory effect of blue light on the germination of wheat grains, and its action was NO-related.

4. NO–ROS Link in the Regulation of Seed Biology

In seeds, the most frequently studied ROS are hydroxyl radicals (OH), superoxide anions (O2•−), or H2O2, and their concentration is controlled by an antioxidant system [96]. Catalases (CAT), glutathione reductases (GR) or superoxide dismutases (SOD) are included in the group of enzymatic antioxidant, whereas non-enzymatic antioxidants include ascorbic acid (AsA) or glutathione (GSH) in reduced form and tocopherols [57,97]. In seed physiology, a dual role of ROS (depending on the actual concentration) is described by the model of the oxidative window. The phrase “oxidative window” is used in reference to germination-optimal ROS concentration. An ROS concentration below or above the “oxidative window” impairs the seed’s ability to germinate, as well as seed vigour, and disturbs the development of additional seedlings [97,98]. RNS are produced in cellular compartments, which are typically regarded as sources of ROS [99]. Concomitantly formed ROS and RNS interact with each other; thus their concentration, is interdependent [100]. The indirect regulation of ROS concentration by NO may be related to the NO-dependent control of enzymes involved in ROS metabolism. The impact of NO on the activity of basic enzymatic antioxidants SOD, CAT, glutathione peroxidase-like, and GR was noticed observed the dormancy release of apple embryos [101]. The regulation of the activity of antioxidant enzymes may be a manifestation of NO-mediated PTMs, as confirmed in other plant tissues [102].
The physiological (ontological) fate of seeds is determined by both ROS and RNS [103]. Similar action of the reactive compounds was demonstrated for seed dormancy loss of many plant species, including apple, sorghum, or barley [17,101,104,105]. The first important data on seed germination related to the increase in NO synthesis and its effect on ROS concerned sorghum seeds [17], revealing that ROS in germinated seeds operate with NO. During germination sensu stricto of sorghum seeds (24 h), high NO liberation was correlated with a non-detectable level of lipid radicals. In contrast, in the postgermination phase (48 h) a decline in cellular NO level was accompanied by an increased amount of lipid radicals in embryonic axes [17]. Further results showed that sorghum seed treatment with NO donors (1 mM SNP or 1 mM DETA-NONOate) kept RNS at a relatively high concentration (a “steady-state” level), stimulating seed germination [106]. This beneficial role of NO was linked to protection against oxidative damage by a decline in the level of carbonylated proteins and the maintenance of membrane integrity by reducing the formation of lipid radicals [106]. Moreover, a NO-positive action was associated with increased iron availability for the labile iron pool, which is necessary for the promotion of cell development, accompanied by reduced iron toxicity (linked to OH formation during the Fenton reaction). NO–ROS cooperation during germination was also proven for switchgrass and Arabidopsis seeds [107,108]. In these seeds, PTIO diminished the stimulatory effect of H2O2 on seed germination. Moreover, for Arabidopsis seeds, a significant increase in the expression of CYP707A2 was obtained after SNP or H2O2 treatment [108]. However, with the simultaneous application of H2O2 and PTIO, this effect was abolished, as reflected by ABA accumulation. Therefore, the authors proposed that H2O2-dependent ABA catabolism during the regulation of dormancy and germination of Arabidopsis seeds requires NO [108].
Dormancy alleviation in apple and barley embryos was associated with alterations in NO and ROS levels [105,109]. Short-term treatment of apple embryos with different dormancy-reversing factors (e.g., HCN, NO donors, ET donors, and PA) increased not only ROS content but also NO emission [82,101,104,110]. Moreover, the results presented by Krasuska et al. [111] indicate that carbonylation, i.e., ROS-dependent protein modification, could also be triggered by NO. The link between NO, PAs, and ROS seems to be connected with PAs catabolism when H2O2 is generated via polyamine oxidase activity stimulated by apple embryo treatment with NO [112].

5. Maintenance of NO Balance and NO-Dependent Modifications in the Regulation of Seed Physiology

During seed dormancy reversal, changes in NO level were detected for pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) seeds and apple embryos [109,113]. NO generation also increased in the embryos of barley seeds, starting from the onset of imbibition [105]. The authors observed that NO levels were higher in seeds of a more dormant cultivar (Sundre), whereas in non-dormant seeds (Harrington) NO production was more rapid. During the culture of seeds of Sundre cultivar, which stayed dormant and did not germinate, even a decrease in NO level in embryos was detected. For Sundre and Harrington seeds, the most significant increase in NO production was observed during the initial stages of germination, when the oxygen conditions in cells become more anaerobic, which may indicate the dominance of the reductive pathway in NO formation (via NO2 reduction) [105].
Phytoglobin (Pgb) is responsible for the regulation of NO metabolism [114]. In anoxia, in the Pgb-NO cycle, NO is oxidized to NO3 (via oxyPgb), which is further metabolized back into NO2 (via NR); this compound is then used for NO formation [114]. During the germination of barley seeds, changes in the expression of gene and protein levels of Pgb were noticed [115]. In embryos of these seeds, Northern blot analysis indicated an increase in Pgb transcript levels up to 8 h of imbibition, followed by a decrease in its expression. The enhanced gene expression was the effect of oxygen depletion during seed germination [115]. Research conducted on aleurone layers of barley seeds confirmed the influence of oxygen levels on the expression of Pgb genes [116]. After aeration following N2 treatment, a decline in Pgb1, and Pgb3 transcripts was observed [116]. Alteration in the expression of Pgb was also detected during the germination of barley seeds with varying in dormancy depth [105]. As NO impairs mitochondrial respiration by reversible binding to cytochrome c oxidase, Zafari et al. [117] analysed the energy status in barley seeds with up- and downregulated expression of Pgb. The upregulation of Pgb led to an increased rate of germination and increased ATP/ADP ratios. For seeds with Pgb overexpression, a lower rate of NO emission after radicle protrusion (compared to the wild type and seeds with the gene down-expression) and a lower level of the SNO group in proteins were observed in the first hours post imbibition [117]. In seeds under anoxia conditions, the NO-Pgb cycle can be an important alternative to fermentation [116]. In aleurone cells, GA promoted the expression of genes encoding α-amylase, Pgb1 and Pgb3, whereas ABA eliminated the stimulating effects of GA. As GA promotes programmed cell death (PCD), the authors suggested that a decrease in NO levels following GA-induced upregulation of Pgb is required to initiate PCD in aleurone layers. In particular, NO inhibits histone deacetylase, the enzyme involved in GA-induced PCD [116] and references herein.
The mechanism of RNS scavenging also includes S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) activity. GSNOR is responsible for the denitrosation of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO, a mobile donor of NO), converting it to oxidized glutathione and ammonia [105,118]. For germinated barley seeds, an increase in GSNOR activity was reported, whereas in non-germinated seeds, it remained at a lower level [105]. In apple embryos, the opposite results were obtained [119]. In the axes of non-dormant, ready-for-germination embryos, GSNOR activity was lower than in the axes of dormant embryos, which can be accounted for by a transient increase in ROS levels [119], exerting a regulatory function on this enzyme [120]. Reduced GSNOR activity was accompanied by an increase in GSNO levels in the tissue [119]. The role of GSNOR in the regulation of seed germination was proven for Burmese grape (Baccaurea ramiflora Lour.) seeds under chilling stress. The use of GSNOR inhibitors (dodecanoic acid (DA) and 5-chloro-3-(2-[(4-ethoxyphenyl)ethylamino]-2-oxoethyl)-1H-indole 2-carboxylicacid (C1)) significantly increased the total RNS pool and reduced the germination rate [121].
GSNO transfers NO to a cysteine residue of protein during trans-S-nitrosation, and generally, this modification regulates the function of proteins [15,118]. Desiccation of Antiaris toxicaria (Lesch.) seeds was accompanied by H2O2 accumulation, increased protein carbonylation, reduced S-nitrosation of antioxidant enzymes and their activities, and decreased seed germination rate [122]. Application of GSNOR inhibitors (DA and C1) before NO exposure promoted S-nitrosation of antioxidant enzymes and enhanced NO-induced seed tolerance to desiccation, which was reflected by increased seed germination [122]. On the other hand, NO negatively regulated ABA signalling during the germination of Arabidopsis seeds through S-nitrosation of kinases SnRK2.2 and SnRK2.3, components of the ABA transduction pathway [123]. Activation of SnRK2.2 and, most likely, SnRK2.3 by ABA was blocked by the exogenous GSNO. Furthermore, S-nitrosation of ABI5 (transcription factor of ABA transduction pathway) marked it for degradation [124]. Recently, Liu et al. [125] presented interesting results using seeds of an Arabidopsis mutant with RNAi silencing GSNOR1. The authors proved that NO affected seed oil content and fatty acid composition [125]. For these seeds, reduced GSNOR activity was associated with increased palmitic acid (C16:0), linoleic acid (C18:2), and linolenic acid (C18:3) levels and significantly decreased stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1), and arachidonic acid (C20:1) levels compared to the WT. The effect of NO on the quantity of oil and fatty acids was also confirmed using rapeseed embryos treated with 10 and/or 20 µM SNP [125]. Moreover, proteomics and transcriptome analysis performed in these embryos showed that some S-nitrosated proteins and genes involved in oil metabolism were differentially regulated by SNP.
The reaction between NO and O2•− results in the formation of ONOO, a nitrating agent. Compounds that can be nitrated include proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. Protein nitration is connected to the covalent binding of a nitro (–NO2) group to one of the two equivalent ortho carbons of tyrosine (Tyr), forming 3-nitro-Tyr [126]. It is considered a stable PTM can thus be used as a reliable marker of nitro-oxidative conditions. Dormancy alleviation and germination of apple embryos were associated with a decrease in protein nitration. The pattern of nitrated proteins suggested that storage proteins were putative targets of nitration, and this PTM acted as an alternative to carbonylation in labelling proteins for degradation [127]. Protein labelling for degradation via the addition of a -NO2 group was reported for ABA receptors PYR/PYL/RCAR. Tyr nitration in these proteins resulted in polyubiquitylation and proteasome-dependent degradation [128].
Lipid (fatty acid) nitration is an increasingly studied NO-dependent modification. During the germination of oilseed rape seeds, a decrease in nitro-oleic acid (NO2-OA) content was observed [129]. Application of NO2-OA significantly increased the NO level and stimulated seed germination. The authors suggested that during seed germination, NO2-OA may act as a NO donor. A high content of nitro-linolenic acid, which may contribute to the increased availability of NO, favouring germination, has also been detected in Arabidopsis seeds [130].
Only a few reports have indicated the occurrence of nitrated nucleic acids in plant cells [131,132]. In seeds, increased RNA nitration was observed in the axes of embryos treated with NO [84]. It was assumed that this type of modification that selects mRNA that should not be translated could act as a mechanism related to the transition from dormant to non-dormant state.
RNS-induced reactions (described in detail in Section 3, Section 4 and Section 5) leading to the transition of seeds from dormant to non-dormant/germination state are shown in Figure 4.

6. NO as a Seed Antiaging Molecule

Seed aging is a natural process, related to deleterious effects in cellular compartments manifested by limitations in seed vigour, germination, and seedling development [20,133]. The intensification of harmful processes in seeds occurs during prolonged seed storage under inconvenient conditions, especially at high humidity and high temperature. In laboratory practice, these conditions are used to accelerate aging events and ensure homogeneous material for further analysis.
Recently, attention has been paid to diminishing the negative effects of seed aging, and the role of NO in seed vigour improvement has appeared to be promising [20]. In particular, a decrease in NO level during seed aging was confirmed. Spectrofluorometric analysis of NO production in Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila L.) seeds demonstrated an increase in endogenous NO levels during the early stages of aging, which later reduced [134]. Other research has shown that NO release was reduced in the axes of warm-stratified apple seeds compared to the axes of cold-stratified seeds [109]. Cold stratification (5 °C) of apple seeds promotes dormancy alleviation and further germination of the isolated embryos, whereas prolonged warm stratification (25 °C) leads to seed aging [109].
After the application of NO donors, mitigation of aging resulted in vigour improvement, and increased germination was detected for apple embryos and Siberian elm or oat (Avena sativa L.) seeds [134,135,136]. In studies published in languages other than English, the positive effect of NO on the germination of aged seeds was confirmed for Plathymenia reticulata (Benth) and pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) seeds [137,138]. Research conducted by Chakraborty et al. [139] showed a positive effect of KNO3 on the quality of stored bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl) seeds. Additionally, priming of aged groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seeds with 150 µM SNP before drought stress improved seed germination and seedling vigour through the modulation of oxidative stress [140]. An NO-dependent increase in the quality of the aged Plathymenia reticulata seeds was achieved by maintaining the integrity of the membrane and stimulating the activity of SOD [137]. In artificially aged oat seeds, the anti-aging action of NO was also related to the regulation of ROS levels [136]. In the mitochondria of these seeds, a NO-dependent decrease in H2O2 content was accompanied by an increase in the activities of enzymes of the antioxidant system, promoting the action of the AsA-GSH cycle. On the other hand, it was postulated that the protective role of NO during seed aging was related to enhanced activity of TCA cycle-related enzymes (fumarate hydratase, malate dehydrogenase, and succinate-CoA ligase) and presumed activation of alternative pathways [136]. Pretreatment of Siberian elm seeds with NO followed by seeds being subject to an aging protocol stimulated GSH synthesis in deteriorated seeds, which could reduce ROS production and subsequent cell death [134]. Additionally, the authors proposed that NO may alleviate oxidative stress-induced cell death in aged seeds via activation of ET biosynthesis, and an increase in the expression of genes encoding S-adenosyl-l-methionine synthetase and ACC synthase was observed [134].
In cells of aged seeds, ROS accumulation is often correlated with increased content of oxidised lipids, proteins, or nucleic acids [141,142]. In the embryonic axes of artificially aged apple seeds, increased RNA oxidation was observed [135]. Analysis conducted on Arabidopsis seeds has demonstrated the degradation of storage mRNA during aging [143,144]; thus RNA oxidation needs to be analysed as one of the causes of this process. The NO-dependent improvement in the vigour of apple embryos isolated from aged seeds was related to decreased content of oxidized RNA and nitrated RNA in the embryonic axes [135,145]. With the increase in some transcript levels, it was proposed that NO application downregulates the degradation of stored mRNA and/or promotes the synthesis of new mRNA [145], which probably contributes to increased translation and protein abundance. During aging, the decreased protein content could be the result of, e.g., their carbonylation [133] or disturbances in biosynthesis [141]. SNP priming significantly affected total soluble proteins in aged groundnut seeds, and after seeds treatment with 150 µM SNP, the level of these molecules was the highest [140]. Moreover, after the seeds were subjected to drought, the level of total soluble proteins dropped, but SNP treatment diminished the protein loss.
One of the products of the oxidation processes is meta-Tyr (m-Tyr), the antimetabolite of phenylalanine (Phe) [146,147]. In recent studies, we [145] confirmed the suitablility of m-Tyr as a marker of seed aging and demonstrated that an increased m-Tyr/Tyr ratio may be related to the loss of seed viability. We also proposed that the mechanism of NO action in seed longevity maintenance depends on the duration of accelerated aging and the biochemical state of the seeds. When seeds were subjected to an aging protocol for a shorter period, in the axes of NO-treated embryos, the m-Tyr content was higher compared to seeds that progressed in aging, whereas Phe was at a similar level. Therefore, it was proposed that NO, through the stimulation of ONOO formation, causes Phe oxidation, resulting in the accumulation of m-Tyr. On the other hand, an increase in m-Tyr level could be the result of enhanced proteolysis of oxidized proteins. After extending the aging protocol, NO application was correlated with increased content of Phe, whereas the level of m-Tyr was similar to that of the untreated embryos. As both amino acids are competitors for tRNAPhe, the antiaging action of NO may be associated with the supply of an adequate amount of Phe for the formation of correctly formed proteins [145].
Maintaining the high viability of the seed may be depended on autophagy, a process responsible for recycling the cytoplasmic content. Autophagy can be induced by various pathways, one of which is related to ROS production [148]. Research conducted on aged apple seeds demonstrated the NO-dependent stimulation of transcript levels of genes encoding homologs of NADPH, which is involved in O2•− generation [135]. In plants, a target of rapamycin (Tor), an evolutionarily conserved Ser/Thr protein kinase, acts as a negative regulator of autophagy and plays an important role in the control of cell proliferation and growth [149,150,151]. Regardless of the duration of apple seed aging, NO downregulated Tor expression in embryonic axes [145]. As Tor also regulates proliferation, we suggested that the prevention of the accumulation of Tor by NO in apple embryos may disrupt this process, minimizing cellular damage [145], in particular because NO simultaneously regulated the expression of genes encoding proteins involved in protein folding, protein structure stabilization, and protein repair. In the embryonic axes of aged seeds, NO treatment did not only impair the expression of genes encoding elements of the Tor complex but probably also affected Tor activity through the regulation of auxin levels. The possibility of a direct impact of NO on Tor activity via PTMs such as nitration or S-nitrosation could also be considered [145]. An increase in the content of the SNO group was observed in the early stages of the aging of Siberian elm seeds [134]. Then, the level of SNO decreased rapidly over time but was still higher than that in the unaged seeds. Seed pretreatment with SNP or GSNO before being subject to aging increased the SNO content in the 2-day-aged seeds. Moreover, among 82 S-nitrosated proteins in non-aged and aged seeds, 11 were enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism. Based on the analysed enzyme activities of carbohydrate metabolism, it seems that NO-mediated protein S-nitrosation induces the activation of glycolysis and the inactivation of the pentose phosphate pathway, protecting the seeds from energy deficiency [134].
Figure 5 shows a summary of RNS-induced modifications leading to the restoration of the metabolism of aged seeds on the literature cited in Section 6.

7. Conclusions and Perspectives

In recent years, the processes occurring during RNS (NO)-induced alleviation of seed dormancy have been investigated in depth (Figure 4). Phytohormonal changes concerning the content of hormones and variation in the expression of genes encoding enzymes of biosynthesis and catabolism, as well as genes encoding elements of signal transduction pathways, have been described. Modification of ROS metabolism of both ROS synthesis and scavenging reactions seems to be a key element regulated by NO that can be used as a dormancy-breaking agent. The action of Pgb, in the context of NO-induced dormancy removal and germination, has only been partially elucidated in cereals and in barley seeds with modified expression of Pgb (Figure 4). There is a lack of information on Pgb levels in seeds of other plant species, particularly those characterized by deep embryonic dormancy. ROS- and RNS-dependent modifications of protein, lipids, and nucleic acids may be a primary effect of RNS application, leading to stimulation of seed germination, although no data are available related to RNS-dependent PTMs of enzymes of the cellular antioxidant system.
The use of NO donors in seed-priming and presoaking procedures is still an open question. To date, we have collected only fragmentary knowledge based on very basic, generally biochemical observations (Figure 3). More sophisticated omics studies (proteomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic) are necessary to fill the gap in our understanding of the events occurring after seed priming with NO or its sources. Taking into account the features of NO donors and compounds released in their decomposition, it seems advisable to seek improved (more specific) sources of NO.
The beneficial effect of NO resulting in the diminishing of aging symptoms in seeds is an interesting observation. The molecular basis of this NO action has been intensely investigated in the past decade, mostly in the context of the regulation of ROS metabolism and ROS-dependent cellular deterioration. Recently, new threats originated from our knowledge on molecular events that explain aging processes in animals have been explored (Figure 5).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232314951/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: K.C. and A.G.; writing—original draft preparation: K.C.; writing—editing and figure preparation: K.C., U.K., P.S., A.G., and K.S.; supervision: K.C. and A.G. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This review was written during the realization of a project financed by the National Science Centre, Poland (2016/23/B/NZ9/03462), a grant given to U.K.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

OH, hydroxyl radical; ABA, abscisic acid; ACC, aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; AsA, ascorbic acid; C1, 5-chloro-3-(2-[(4-ethoxyphenyl)ethylamino]-2-oxoethyl)-1H-indole 2-carboxylicacid; CAT, catalase; cPTIO, 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3 oxide; DA, dodecanoic acid; DETA-NONOate, diethylenetriamine NONOate or N-[bis(2-Aminoethyl)amino]-N-hydroxynitrus amide; DPTA-NONOate, dipropylenetriamine NONOate or (Z)-1-[N-(3-aminopropyl)-N-(3-ammoniopropyl)amino]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate; ERFVII, VII ethylene response transcription factor; ET, ethylene; GA, gibberellin; GA2ox, gibberellin 2-oxidase; GA3ox, gibberellin 3-oxidase; GR, glutathione reductase; GSH, glutathione; GSNO, S-nitrosoglutathione; GSNOR, S-nitrosoglutathione reductase; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; Hsp, heat shock protein; JA, jasmonic acid; Lea, late embryogenesis abundant; m-Tyr, meta-tyrosine; MeJa, methyl jasmonate; NO, nitric oxide; NO, nitroxyl anion; NO+, nitrosonium cation; NO, nitric oxide radicle; -NO2, nitro group; NO2-OA; nitro-oleic acid; NOC, NO-amine complexes, alternative name for DETA-NONOate; NR, nitrate reductase; O2•-, superoxide anion; ONOO-, peroxynitrite; PAs, polyamines; PCD, programmed cell death; Pgb, phytoglobin; POX, peroxidase; PTIO, 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl 3-oxide; PTMs, posttranslational modifications; RNS, reactive nitrogen species; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RSNO, S-nitrosothiol; SIN-1, morpholinosydnonimine; SIN-1C, 3-morpholinoiminoacetonitrile; SNAP, S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D-penicillamine; SNO, S-nitrosated groups; SNP, sodium nitroprusside; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; Tor, target of rapamycin; Tyr, tyrosine.

References

  1. Fang, P.; Sun, T.; Wang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Pandey, A.K.; Zhu, C.; Xu, P. Plant Gasotransmitters: Light Molecules Interplaying with Heavy Metals. Rev. Env. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 20, 31–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Corpas, F.J.; González-Gordo, S.; Cañas, A.; Palma, J.M. Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Sulfide in Plants: Which Comes First? J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4391–4404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sparrman, B.; Ehrenberg, L.; Ehrenberg, A.; Andersson, G.; Stenhagen, E.; Palmstierna, H. Scavenging of Free Radicals and Radiation Protection by Nitric Oxide in Plant Seeds. Acta. Chem. Scand. 1959, 13, 199–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Klepper, L. Nitric Oxide (NO) and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Emissions from Herbicide-Treated Soybean Plants. Atmos. Environ. 1979, 13, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Delledonne, M.; Xia, Y.; Dixon, R.A.; Lamb, C. Nitric Oxide Functions as a Signal in Plant Disease Resistance. Nature 1998, 394, 585–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kolbert, Z.; Barroso, J.B.; Brouquisse, R.; Corpas, F.J.; Gupta, K.J.; Lindermayr, C.; Loake, G.J.; Palma, J.M.; Petřivalský, M.; Wendehenne, D.; et al. A Forty Year Journey: The Generation and Roles of NO in Plants. Nitric Oxide 2019, 93, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Giba, Z.; Grubišić, D.; Todorović, S.; Sajc, L.; Stojaković, D.; Konjević, R. Effect of Nitric Oxide–Releasing Compounds on Phytochrome–Controlled Germination of Empress Tree Seeds. Plant Growth Regul. 1998, 26, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Grubišić, D.; Konjević, R. Light and Nitrate Interaction in Phytochrome-Controlled Germination of Paulownia Tomentosa Seeds. Planta 1990, 181, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alboresi, A.; Gestin, C.; Leydecker, M.T.; Bedu, M.; Meyer, C.; Truong, H.N. Nitrate, a Signal Relieving Seed Dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Env. 2005, 28, 500–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Keeley, J.E.; Fotheringham, C.J. Trace Gas Emissions and Smoke-Induced Seed Germination. Science 1997, 276, 1248–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumar, P.; Pathak, S. Nitric Oxide: A Key Driver of Signaling in Plants. MOJ Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2018, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Corpas, F.J.; Barroso, J.B. Nitric Oxide Synthase-like Activity in Higher Plants. Nitric Oxide 2017, 68, 5–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Astier, J.; Gross, I.; Durner, J. Nitric Oxide Production in Plants: An Update. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3401–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Astier, J.; Mounier, A.; Santolini, J.; Jeandroz, S.; Wendehenne, D.; Brouquisse, R. The Evolution of Nitric Oxide Signalling Diverges between Animal and Green Lineages. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4355–4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gupta, K.J.; Kaladhar, V.C.; Fitzpatrick, T.B.; Fernie, A.R.; Møller, I.M.; Loake, G.J. Nitric Oxide Regulation of Plant Metabolism. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 228–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bethke, P.C.; Badger, M.R.; Jones, R.L. Apoplastic Synthesis of Nitric Oxide by Plant Tissues. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Simontacchi, M.; Jasid, S.; Puntarulo, S. Nitric Oxide Generation during Early Germination of Sorghum Seeds. Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 839–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gupta, K.J.; Igamberdiev, A.U.; Manjunatha, G.; Segu, S.; Moran, J.F.; Neelawarne, B.; Bauwe, H.; Kaiser, W.M. The Emerging Roles of Nitric Oxide (NO) in Plant Mitochondria. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bykova, N.V.; Hu, J.; Ma, Z.; Igamberdiev, A.U. The Role of Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Bioenergetics, Metabolism, and Signaling during Seed Germination. In Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species Signaling and Communication in Plants; Signaling and Communication in Plants; Gupta, K.J., Igamberdiev, A.U., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 177–195. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ciacka, K.; Krasuska, U.; Staszek, P.; Wal, A.; Zak, J.; Gniazdowska, A. Effect of Nitrogen Reactive Compounds on Aging in Seed. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gupta, K.J.; Hancock, J.T.; Petrivalsky, M.; Kolbert, Z.; Lindermayr, C.; Durner, J.; Barroso, J.B.; Palma, J.M.; Brouquisse, R.; Wendehenne, D.; et al. Recommendations on Terminology and Experimental Best Practice Associated with Plant Nitric Oxide Research. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 1828–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arasimowicz-Jelonek, M.; Floryszak-Wieczorek, J.; Kosmala, A. Are Nitric Oxide Donors a Valuable Tool to Study the Functional Role of Nitric Oxide in Plant Metabolism? Plant Biol. 2011, 13, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ullrich, T.; Oberle, S.; Abate, A.; Schröder, H. Photoactivation of the Nitric Oxide Donor SIN-1. FEBS Lett. 1997, 406, 66–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bates, J.N.; Baker, M.T.; Guerra, R.; Harrison, D.G. Nitric Oxide Generation from Nitroprusside by Vascular Tissue: Evidence That Reduction of the Nitroprusside Anion and Cyanide Loss Are Required. Biochem. Pharm. 1991, 42, S157–S165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shishido, S.M.; de Oliveira, M.G. Photosensitivity of Aqueous Sodium Nitroprusside Solutions: Nitric Oxide Release versus Cyanide Toxicity. Prog. React. Kinet. Mech. 2001, 26, 239–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huerta, S.; Chilka, S.; Bonavida, B. Nitric Oxide Donors: Novel Cancer Therapeutics (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2008, 33, 909–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Melvin, A.C.; Jones, W.M.; Lutzke, A.; Allison, C.L.; Reynolds, M.M. S-Nitrosoglutathione Exhibits Greater Stability than S-Nitroso-N-Acetylpenicillamine under Common Laboratory Conditions: A Comparative Stability Study. Nitric Oxide 2019, 92, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Singh, R.J.; Hogg, N.; Joseph, J.; Konorev, E.; Kalyanaraman, B. The Peroxynitrite Generator, SIN-1, Becomes a Nitric Oxide Donor in the Presence of Electron Acceptors. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1999, 361, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Keefer, L.K.; Nims, R.W.; Davies, K.M.; Wink, D.A. “NONOates” (1-Substituted Diazen-1-Ium-1,2-Diolates) as Nitric Oxide Donors: Convenient Nitric Oxide Dosage Forms. Methods Enzym. 1996, 268, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, B.; Ming, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xing, H.; Fu, R.; Li, Z.; Ni, R.; Li, L.; Duan, D.; Xu, J.; et al. Recent Developments in Pharmacological Effect, Mechanism and Application Prospect of Diazeniumdiolates. Front. Pharm. 2020, 11, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. DeMartino, A.W.; Kim-Shapiro, D.B.; Patel, R.P.; Gladwin, M.T. Nitrite and Nitrate Chemical Biology and Signalling. Br. J. Pharm. 2019, 176, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yamasaki, H. Nitrite-Dependent Nitric Oxide Production Pathway: Implications for Involvement of Active Nitrogen Species in Photoinhibition in Vivo. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2000, 355, 1477–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Janczyk, A.; Wolnicka-Glubisz, A.; Chmura, A.; Elas, M.; Matuszak, Z.; Stochel, G.; Urbanska, K. NO-Dependent Phototoxicity of Roussin’s Black Salt against Cancer Cells. Nitric Oxide 2004, 10, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Garcia, D.; Zhao, S.; Arif, S.; Zhao, Y.; Ming, L.C.; Huang, D. Seed Priming Technology as a Key Strategy to Increase Crop Plant Production under Adverse Environmental Conditions. J. Agric. Hortic. Res. 2022, 5, 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lutts, S.; Benincasa, P.; Wojtyla, L.; Kubala, S.S.; Pace, R.; Lechowska, K.; Quinet, M.; Garnczarska, M. Seed Priming: New Comprehensive Approaches for an Old Empirical Technique. In New Challenges in Seed Biology-Basic and Translational Research Driving Seed Technology; Araujo, S., Balestrazzi, A., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; pp. 1–46. ISBN 978-953-51-2659-1. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fancy, N.N.; Bahlmann, A.K.; Loake, G.J. Nitric Oxide Function in Plant Abiotic Stress. Plant Cell Env. 2017, 40, 462–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Sami, F.; Faizan, M.; Faraz, A.; Siddiqui, H.; Yusuf, M.; Hayat, S. Nitric Oxide-Mediated Integrative Alterations in Plant Metabolism to Confer Abiotic Stress Tolerance, NO Crosstalk with Phytohormones and NO-Mediated Post Translational Modifications in Modulating Diverse Plant Stress. Nitric Oxide 2018, 73, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yadav, A.; Mathan, J.; Bhati, K.K.; Singh, A. Nitric Oxide Signaling and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. In Nitric Oxide in Plant Biology: An Ancient Molecule with Emerging Roles; Singh, V.P., Singh, S., Tripathi, D.K., Romero-Puertas, M.C., Sandalio, L.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 373–390. ISBN 9780128187975. [Google Scholar]
  39. Habib, N.; Ali, Q.; Ali, S.; Javed, M.T.; Haider, M.Z.; Perveen, R.; Shahid, M.R.; Rizwan, M.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Elkelish, A.; et al. Use of Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Better Yield of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) under Water Deficit Conditions: Growth, Osmoregulation, and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism. Plants 2020, 9, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Karimi, Z.; Khara, J.; Habibi, G. Combined Hydrogen Peroxide and Nitric Oxide Priming Modulate Salt Stress Tolerance in Acclimated and Non-Acclimated Oilseed Rape (Brassica Napus L.) Plants. J. Plant Physiol. Breed. 2020, 10, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Flórez, M.; Carbonell, M.V.; Martínez, E. Exposure of Maize Seeds to Stationary Magnetic Fields: Effects on Germination and Early Growth. Env. Exp. Bot. 2007, 59, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Patel, P.; Kadur Narayanaswamy, G.; Kataria, S.; Baghel, L. Involvement of Nitric Oxide in Enhanced Germination and Seedling Growth of Magnetoprimed Maize Seeds. Plant Signal Behav. 2017, 12, e1293217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bibi, A.; Majid, S.A.; Azhar, N.; Amjad, M.S.; Ashraf, S.; Ahmad, I.; Mumtaz, S.; Ijaz, S. Differential Changes in Growth and Enzyme Activities of Chilling Induced Wheat Seedlings by Nitric Oxide Priming. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2020, 23, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhu, Z.H.; Sami, A.; Xu, Q.Q.; Wu, L.L.; Zheng, W.Y.; Chen, Z.P.; Jin, X.Z.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Yu, Y.; et al. Effects of Seed Priming Treatments on the Germination and Development of Two Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) Varieties under the Co-Influence of Low Temperature and Drought. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gama, G.; Cunha, P.; Fialho, C.; Pinheiro, D.; Paula, I. Effect of Nitric Oxide on Seed Germination and Seedlings Development of Carrot under Water Deficit. J. Exp. Agric. Int. 2018, 22, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, H. Nitric Oxide Alleviates the Inhibition of Salinity Stress on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Cynanchum Bungei Decne (Asclepiadaceae). HortScience 2015, 50, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shams, M.; Yildirim, E.; Agar, G.; Ercisli, S.; Ekinci, M.; Dursun, A.; Kul, R. Nitric Oxide Alleviates Copper Toxicity in Germinating Seed and Seedling Growth of Lactuca Sativa L. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobot. Cluj. Napoca. 2018, 46, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Rather, B.A.; Mir, I.R.; Masood, A.; Anjum, N.A.; Khan, N.A. Nitric Oxide Pre-Treatment Advances Seed Germination and Alleviates Copper-Induced Photosynthetic Inhibition in Indian Mustard. Plants 2020, 9, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pires, R.M.D.O.; de Souza, G.A.; Cardoso, A.; Dias, D.C.F.D.S.; Borges, E.E.D.L.E. Action of Nitric Oxide in Sesame Seeds (Sesamum Indicum L.) Submitted to Stress by Cadmium. J. Seed Sci. 2016, 38, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Li, X.; Jiang, H.; Liu, F.; Cai, J.; Dai, T.; Cao, W.; Jiang, D. Induction of Chilling Tolerance in Wheat during Germination by Pre-Soaking Seed with Nitric Oxide and Gibberellin. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 71, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Amooaghaie, R.; Nikzad, K. The Role of Nitric Oxide in Priming-Induced Low-Temperature Tolerance in Two Genotypes of Tomato. Seed Sci. Res. 2013, 23, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Oliveira, T.F.; Oliveira dos Santos, H.; Vaz-Tostes, D.P.; Cavasin, P.Y.; Rocha, D.K.; Tirelli, G.V. Protective Action of Priming Agents on Urochloa Brizantha Seeds under Water Restriction and Salinity Conditions. J. Seed Sci. 2021, 43, e202143010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, J.; Xue, T.; Shen, Y. Effect of Nitric Oxide on Seed Germination and Dormancy in Empress Trees. Horttechnology 2019, 29, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yiğit, İ.; Atici, Ö. Seed Priming with Nitric Oxide Mitigates Exogenous Methylglyoxal Toxicity by Restoring Glyoxalase and Antioxidant Systems in Germinating Maize (Zea Mays L.) Seeds. Cereal Res. Commun. 2021, 50, 811–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Marvasi, M. Potential Use and Perspectives of Nitric Oxide Donors in Agriculture. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 1065–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Venkatesan, S.; Masilamani, P.; Janaki, P.; Eevera, T.; Sundareswaran, S.; Rajkumar, P. Role of Nitric Oxide in Seed Biology and Seed Production: A Review. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2020, 12, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kumar, S.P.J.; Chintagunta, A.D.; Reddy, Y.M.; Rajjou, L.; Garlapati, V.K.; Agarwal, D.K.; Prasad, S.R.; Simal-Gandara, J. Implications of Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Seed Physiology for Sustainable Crop Productivity under Changing Climate Conditions. Curr. Plant Biol. 2021, 26, 100197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gniazdowska, A.; Babańczyk, T.; Krasuska, U. Nitric Oxide as Germination Controlling Factor in Seeds of Various Plant Species. Phyton 2012, 52, 219–226. [Google Scholar]
  59. Floryszak-Wieczorek, J.; Milczarek, G.; Arasimowicz, M.; Ciszewski, A. Do Nitric Oxide Donors Mimic Endogenous NO-Related Response in Plants? Planta 2006, 224, 1363–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chiesa, J.J.; Baidanoff, F.M.; Golombek, D.A. Don’t Just Say No: Differential Pathways and Pharmacological Responses to Diverse Nitric Oxide Donors. Biochem. Pharm. 2018, 156, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Keisham, M.; Jain, P.; Singh, N.; von Toerne, C.; Bhatla, S.C.; Lindermayr, C. Deciphering the Nitric Oxide, Cyanide and Iron-Mediated Actions of Sodium Nitroprusside in Cotyledons of Salt Stressed Sunflower Seedlings. Nitric Oxide 2019, 88, 10–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Arnold, W.P.; Longnecker, D.E.; Epstein, R.M. Photodegradation of Sodium Nitroprusside Biologic Activity and Cyanide Release. Anesthesiology 1984, 61, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kępczyński, J. Gas-Priming as a Novel Simple Method of Seed Treatment with Ethylene, Hydrogen Cyanide or Nitric Oxide. Acta Physiol. Plant 2021, 43, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bewley, J.D. Seed Germination and Dormancy. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1055–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Šírová, J.; Sedlářová, M.; Piterková, J.; Luhová, L.; Petřivalský, M. The Role of Nitric Oxide in the Germination of Plant Seeds and Pollen. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 560–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Arc, E.; Sechet, J.; Corbineau, F.; Rajjou, L.; Marion-Poll, A. ABA Crosstalk with Ethylene and Nitric Oxide in Seed Dormancy and Germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Bethke, P.C.; Gubler, F.; Jacobsen, J.V.; Jones, R.L. Dormancy of Arabidopsis Seeds and Barley Grains Can Be Broken by Nitric Oxide. Planta 2004, 219, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bethke, P.C.; Libourel, I.G.L.; Jones, R.L. Nitric Oxide Reduces Seed Dormancy in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sarath, G.; Bethke, P.C.; Jones, R.; Baird, L.M.; Hou, G.; Mitchell, R.B. Nitric Oxide Accelerates Seed Germination in Warm-Season Grasses. Planta 2006, 223, 1154–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Gniazdowska, A.; Dobrzyńska, U.; Babańczyk, T.; Bogatek, R. Breaking the Apple Embryo Dormancy by Nitric Oxide Involves the Stimulation of Ethylene Production. Planta 2007, 225, 1051–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kępczyński, J.; Cembrowska-Lech, D.; Sznigir, P. Interplay between Nitric Oxide, Ethylene, and Gibberellic Acid Regulating the Release of Amaranthus Retroflexus Seed Dormancy. Acta Physiol. Plant 2017, 39, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Sami, A.; Riaz, M.W.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, Z.; Zhou, K. Alleviating Dormancy in Brassica Oleracea Seeds Using NO and KAR1 with Ethylene Biosynthetic Pathway, ROS and Antioxidant Enzymes Modifications. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Deng, Z.; Song, S. Sodium Nitroprusside, Ferricyanide, Nitrite and Nitrate Decrease the Thermo-Dormancy of Lettuce Seed Germination in a Nitric Oxide-Dependent Manner in Light. South Afr. J. Bot. 2012, 78, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Bethke, P.C.; Libourel, I.G.L.; Reinöhl, V.; Jones, R.L. Sodium Nitroprusside, Cyanide, Nitrite, and Nitrate Break Arabidopsis Seed Dormancy in a Nitric Oxide-Dependent Manner. Planta 2006, 223, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Giba, Z.; Grubisic, D.; Konjevic, R. Sodium Nitroprusside-Stimulated Germination of Common Chick Weed (Stellaria Media L.) Seeds. Arch. Biol. Sci. 1992, 44, 17–18. [Google Scholar]
  76. Li, W.; Liu, X.; Khan, M.A.; Kamiya, Y.; Yamaguchi, S. Hormonal and Environmental Regulation of Seed Germination in Flixweed (Descurainia Sophia). Plant Growth Regul. 2005, 45, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kopyra, M.; Gwóźdź, E.A. Nitric Oxide Stimulates Seed Germination and Counteracts the Inhibitory Effect of Heavy Metals and Salinity on Root Growth of Lupinus Luteus. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2003, 41, 1011–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Li, W.; Liu, X.; Khan, M.A.; Yamaguchi, S. The Effect of Plant Growth Regulators, Nitric Oxide, Nitrate, Nitrite and Light on the Germination of Dimorphic Seeds of Suaeda Salsa under Saline Conditions. J. Plant Res. 2005, 118, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Piterková, J.; Luhová, L.; Hofman, J.; Turecková, V.; Novák, O.; Petrivalsky, M.; Fellner, M. Nitric Oxide Is Involved in Light-Specific Responses of Tomato during Germination under Normal and Osmotic Stress Conditions. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Matakiadis, T.; Alboresi, A.; Jikumaru, Y.; Tatematsu, K.; Pichon, O.; Renou, J.-P.; Kamiya, Y.; Nambara, E.; Truong, H.-N. The Arabidopsis Abscisic Acid Catabolic Gene CYP707A2 Plays a Key Role in Nitrate Control of Seed Dormancy. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 949–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Lozano-Juste, J.; Leon, J. Enhanced Abscisic Acid-Mediated Responses in Nia1nia2noa1-2 Triple Mutant Impaired in NIA/NR- and AtNOA1-Dependent Nitric Oxide Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Gniazdowska, A.; Krasuska, U.; Bogatek, R. Dormancy Removal in Apple Embryos by Nitric Oxide or Cyanide Involves Modifications in Ethylene Biosynthetic Pathway. Planta 2010, 232, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Carrillo-Barral, N.; Matilla, A.J.; Iglesias-Fernández, R.; del Carmen Rodríguez-Gacio, M. Nitrate-Induced Early Transcriptional Changes during Imbibition in Non-after-Ripened Sisymbrium Officinale Seeds. Physiol. Plant 2012, 148, 560–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Andryka-Dudek, P.; Ciacka, K.; Wiśniewska, A.; Bogatek, R.; Gniazdowska, A. Nitric Oxide-Induced Dormancy Removal of Apple Embryos Is Linked to Alterations in Expression of Genes Encoding ABA and JA Biosynthetic or Transduction Pathways and RNA Nitration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Yan, D.; Easwaran, V.; Chau, V.; Okamoto, M.; Ierullo, M.; Kimura, M.; Endo, A.; Yano, R.; Pasha, A.; Gong, Y.; et al. NIN-like Protein 8 Is a Master Regulator of Nitrate-Promoted Seed Germination in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Yan, A.; Chen, Z. The Control of Seed Dormancy and Germination by Temperature, Light and Nitrate. Bot. Rev. 2020, 86, 39–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gibbs, D.J.; Md Isa, N.; Movahedi, M.; Lozano-Juste, J.; Mendiondo, G.M.; Berckhan, S.; Marín-de la Rosa, N.; Vicente Conde, J.; Sousa Correia, C.; Pearce, S.P.; et al. Nitric Oxide Sensing in Plants Is Mediated by Proteolytic Control of Group VII ERF Transcription Factors. Mol. Cell 2014, 53, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Carrillo-Barral, N.; Matilla, A.J.; del Carmen Rodríguez-Gacio, M.; Iglesias-Fernández, R. Nitrate Affects Sensu-Stricto Germination of after-Ripened Sisymbrium Officinale Seeds by Modifying Expression of SoNCED5, SoCYP707A2 and SoGA3ox2 Genes. Plant Sci. 2014, 217–218, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Liu, Y.; Shi, L.; Ye, N.; Liu, R.; Jia, W.; Zhang, J. Nitric Oxide-Induced Rapid Decrease of Abscisic Acid Concentration Is Required in Breaking Seed Dormancy in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2009, 183, 1030–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Nagel, M.; Alqudah, A.M.; Bailly, M.; Rajjou, L.; Pistrick, S.; Matzig, G.; Börner, A.; Kranner, I. Novel Loci and a Role for Nitric Oxide for Seed Dormancy and Preharvest Sprouting in Barley. Plant Cell Env. 2018, 42, 1318–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bethke, P.C.; Libourel, I.G.L.; Aoyama, N.; Chung, Y.-Y.; Still, D.W.; Jones, R.L. The Arabidopsis Aleurone Layer Responds to Nitric Oxide, Gibberellin, and Abscisic Acid and Is Sufficient and Necessary for Seed Dormancy. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1173–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Krasuska, U.; Ciacka, K.; Gniazdowska, A. Nitric Oxide-Polyamines Cross-Talk during Dormancy Release and Germination of Apple Embryos. Nitric Oxide 2017, 68, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Jacobsen, J.V.; Barrero, J.M.; Hughes, T.; Julkowska, M.; Taylor, J.M.; Xu, Q.; Gubler, F. Roles for Blue Light, Jasmonate and Nitric Oxide in the Regulation of Dormancy and Germination in Wheat Grain (Triticum Aestivum L.). Planta 2013, 238, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ranjan, R.; Lewak, S. Jasmonic Acid Promotes Germination and Lipase Activity in Non-Stratified Apple Embryos. Physiol. Plant 1992, 86, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lewak, S. Metabolic Control of Embryonic Dormancy in Apple Seed: Seven Decades of Research. Acta Physiol. Plant 2011, 33, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bailly, C. The Signalling Role of ROS in the Regulation of Seed Germination and Dormancy. Biochem. J. 2019, 476, 3019–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Bailly, C.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Corbineau, F. From Intracellular Signaling Networks to Cell Death: The Dual Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Seed Physiology. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2008, 331, 806–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bailly, C.; Merendino, L. Oxidative Signalling in Seed Germination and Early Seedling Growth: An Emerging Role for ROS Trafficking and Inter-Organelle Communication. Biochem. J. 2021, 478, 1977–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mandal, M.; Sarkar, M.; Khan, A.; Biswas, M.; Masi, A.; Rakwal, R.; Agrawal, G.K.; Srivastava, A.; Sarkar, A. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Reactive Nitrogen Species (RNS) in Plants—Maintenance of Structural Individuality and Functional Blend. Adv. Redox Res. 2022, 5, 100039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Radi, R. Oxygen Radicals, Nitric Oxide, and Peroxynitrite: Redox Pathways in Molecular Medicine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 5839–5848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Krasuska, U.; Gniazdowska, A. Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Cyanide as Regulating Factors of Enzymatic Antioxidant System in Germinating Apple Embryos. Acta Physiol. Plant 2012, 34, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Kolbert, Z.; Feigl, G. Cross-Talk of Reactive Oxygen Species and Nitric Oxide in Various Processes of Plant Development: Past and Present. In Reactive Oxygen Species in Plants: Boon or Bane-Revisiting the Role of ROS; Singh, V.P., Singh, S., Tripathi, D.K., Prasad, S.M., Chauhan, D.K., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 261–289. ISBN 9781119324928. [Google Scholar]
  103. Krasuska, U.; Ciacka, K.; Andryka-Dudek, P.; Bogatek, R.; Gniazdowska, A. “Nitrosative Door” in Seed Dormancy Alleviation and Germination. In Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species Signaling and Communication in Plants; Signaling and Communication in Plants; Gupta, K.J., Igamberdiev, A.U., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 23, pp. 215–237. [Google Scholar]
  104. Krasuska, U.; Dębska, K.; Otulak, K.; Bogatek, R.; Gniazdowska, A. Switch from Heterotrophy to Autotrophy of Apple Cotyledons Depends on NO Signal. Planta 2015, 242, 1221–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Ma, Z.; Marsolais, F.; Bykova, N.V.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species Mediate Metabolic Changes in Barley Seed Embryo during Germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Jasid, S.; Simontacchi, M.; Puntarulo, S. Exposure to Nitric Oxide Protects against Oxidative Damage but Increases the Labile Iron Pool in Sorghum Embryonic Axes. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 3953–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Sarath, G.; Hou, G.; Baird, L.M.; Mitchell, R.B. Reactive Oxygen Species, ABA and Nitric Oxide Interactions on the Germination of Warm-Season C4-Grasses. Planta 2007, 226, 697–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Liu, Y.; Ye, N.; Liu, R.; Chen, M.; Zhang, J. H2O2 Mediates the Regulation of ABA Catabolism and GA Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis Seed Dormancy and Germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 2979–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Dębska, K.; Krasuska, U.; Budnicka, K.; Bogatek, R.; Gniazdowska, A. Dormancy Removal of Apple Seeds by Cold Stratification Is Associated with Fluctuation in H2O2, NO Production and Protein Carbonylation Level. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Gniazdowska, A.; Krasuska, U.; Czajkowska, K.; Bogatek, R. Nitric Oxide, Hydrogen Cyanide and Ethylene Are Required in the Control of Germination and Undisturbed Development of Young Apple Seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 61, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Krasuska, U.; Ciacka, K.; Dębska, K.; Bogatek, R.; Gniazdowska, A. Dormancy Alleviation by NO or HCN Leading to Decline of Protein Carbonylation Levels in Apple (Malus Domestica Borkh.) Embryos. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 1132–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Krasuska, U.; Ciacka, K.; Bogatek, R.; Gniazdowska, A. Polyamines and Nitric Oxide Link in Regulation of Dormancy Removal and Germination of Apple (Malus Domestica Borkh.) Embryos. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 590–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Shalimu, D.; Sun, J.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Sun, L.; Liu, Y. Changes in Oxidative Patterns during Dormancy Break by Warm and Cold Stratification in Seeds of an Edible Fruit Tree. AoB Plants 2016, 8, plw024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Ma, Z.; Bykova, N.V.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Cell Signaling Mechanisms and Metabolic Regulation of Germination and Dormancy in Barley Seeds. Crop. J. 2017, 5, 459–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Guy, P.A.; Sidaner, J.P.; Schroeder, S.; Edney, M.; MacGregor, A.W.; Hill, R.D. Embryo Phytoglobin Gene Expression as a Measure of Germination in Cereals. J. Cereal. Sci. 2002, 36, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Nie, X.; Mira, M.; Igamberdiev, A.U.; Hill, R.D.; Stasolla, C. Anaerobiosis Modulation of Two Phytoglobins in Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.), and Their Regulation by Gibberellin and Abscisic Acid in Aleurone Cells. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 182, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zafari, S.; Hebelstrup, K.H.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Transcriptional and Metabolic Changes Associated with Phytoglobin Expression during Germination of Barley Seeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Leterrier, M.; Chaki, M.; Airaki, M.; Valderrama, R.; Palma, J.M.; Barroso, J.B.; Corpas, F.J. Function of S-Nitrosoglutathione Reductase (GSNOR) in Plant Development and under Biotic/Abiotic Stress. Plant Signal Behav. 2011, 6, 789–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Ciacka, K.; Krasuska, U.; Otulak-Kozieł, K.; Gniazdowska, A. Dormancy Removal by Cold Stratification Increases Glutathione and S-Nitrosoglutathione Content in Apple Seeds. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 138, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Kovacs, I.; Holzmeister, C.; Wirtz, M.; Geerlof, A.; Fröhlich, T.; Römling, G.; Kuruthukulangarakoola, G.T.; Linster, E.; Hell, R.; Arnold, G.J.; et al. ROS-Mediated Inhibition of S-Nitrosoglutathione Reductase Contributes to the Activation of Anti-Oxidative Mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Bai, X.G.; Chen, J.H.; Kong, X.X.; Todd, C.D.; Yang, Y.P.; Hu, X.Y.; Li, D.Z. Carbon Monoxide Enhances the Chilling Tolerance of Recalcitrant Baccaurea Ramiflora Seeds via Nitric Oxide-Mediated Glutathione Homeostasis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bai, X.; Yang, L.; Tian, M.; Chen, J.; Shi, J.; Yang, Y.; Hu, X. Nitric Oxide Enhances Desiccation Tolerance of Recalcitrant Antiaris Toxicaria Seeds via Protein S-Nitrosylation and Carbonylation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Wang, P.; Zhu, J.-K.; Lang, Z. Nitric Oxide Suppresses the Inhibitory Effect of Abscisic Acid on Seed Germination by S-Nitrosylation of SnRK2 Proteins. Plant Signal Behav. 2015, 10, e1031939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Albertos, P.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Tatematsu, K.; Mateos, I.; Sánchez-Vicente, I.; Nambara, E.; Lorenzo, O. S-Nitrosylation Triggers ABI5 Degradation to Promote Seed Germination and Seedling Growth. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Liu, J.; Zhu, X.-Y.; Deng, L.-B.; Liu, H.-F.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.-R.; Wang, H.-Z.; Hua, W. Nitric Oxide Affects Seed Oil Accumulation and Fatty Acid Composition through Protein S-Nitrosation. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Chaki, M.; Valderrama, R.; Fernández-Ocaña, A.M.; Carreras, A.; López-Jaramillo, J.; Luque, F.; Palma, J.M.; Pedrajas, J.R.; Begara-Morales, J.C.; Sánchez-Calvo, B.; et al. Protein Targets of Tyrosine Nitration in Sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.) Hypocotyls. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 4221–4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Krasuska, U.; Ciacka, K.; Orzechowski, S.; Fettke, J.; Bogatek, R.; Gniazdowska, A. Modification of the Endogenous NO Level Influences Apple Embryos Dormancy by Alterations of Nitrated and Biotinylated Protein Patterns. Planta 2016, 244, 877–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Castillo, M.C.; Lozano-Juste, J.; González-Guzmán, M.; Rodriguez, L.; Rodriguez, P.L.; León, J. Inactivation of PYR/PYL/RCAR ABA Receptors by Tyrosine Nitration May Enable Rapid Inhibition of ABA Signaling by Nitric Oxide in Plants. Sci. Signal. 2015, 8, ra89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Vollár, M.; Feigl, G.; Oláh, D.; Horváth, A.; Molnár, Á.; Kúsz, N.; Ördög, A.; Csupor, D.; Kolbert, Z. Nitro-Oleic Acid in Seeds and Differently Developed Seedlings of Brassica Napus L. Plants 2020, 9, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Mata-Pérez, C.; Sánchez-Calvo, B.; Begara-Morales, J.C.; Padilla, M.N.; Valderrama, R.; Corpas, F.J.; Barroso, J.B. Nitric Oxide Release from Nitro-Fatty Acids in Arabidopsis Roots. Plant Signal Behav. 2016, 11, e1154255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Izbiańska, K.; Floryszak-Wieczorek, J.; Gajewska, J.; Meller, B.; Kuźnicki, D.; Arasimowicz-Jelonek, M. RNA and MRNA Nitration as a Novel Metabolic Link in Potato Immune Response to Phytophthora Infestans. Front Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Staszek, P.; Gniazdowska, A. Peroxynitrite Induced Signaling Pathways in Plant Response to Non-Proteinogenic Amino Acids. Planta 2020, 252, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ciacka, K.; Tymiński, M.; Gniazdowska, A.; Krasuska, U. Carbonylation of Proteins—An Element of Plant Ageing. Planta 2020, 252, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. He, Y.; Xue, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, X. Nitric Oxide Alleviates Cell Death through Protein S-Nitrosylation and Transcriptional Regulation during the Ageing of Elm Seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 5141–5155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Ciacka, K.; Tyminski, M.; Gniazdowska, A.; Krasuska, U. Nitric Oxide as a Remedy against Oxidative Damages in Apple Seeds Undergoing Accelerated Ageing. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Mao, C.; Zhu, Y.; Cheng, H.; Yan, H.; Zhao, L.; Tang, J.; Ma, X.; Mao, P. Nitric Oxide Regulates Seedling Growth and Mitochondrial Responses in Aged Oat Seeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Pereira, B.L.C.; Borges, E.; Oliveira, A.; Leite, H.G.; Gonçalves, J.F. Influence of Nitric Oxide on the Germination of Seeds of Plathymenia Reticulata Benth with Low Vigor. Sci. For. 2010, 38, 629–636. [Google Scholar]
  138. Rouhi, H.R.; Moradi, A.; Saman, M.; Shahbodaghlo, A.; Mohammadi, Y. Seed Priming with SNP Improves the Performance of Aged Pumpkin (Cucurbita Pepo L.) Seeds under Drought Stress. Iran. J. Seed Sci. Technol. 2019, 8, 67–81. [Google Scholar]
  139. Chakraborty, S.; Aher, B.M.; Kalyanrao; Rawat, A.; Sasidharan, N. Effect of Potassium Nitrate on Seed Quality Enhancement in Different Aged Seeds of Bottle Gourd (Lagenaria Siceraria (Molina) Standl). J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci. 2017, 5, 656–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Sepehri, A.; Rouhi, H.R. Enhancement of Seed Vigor Performance in Aged Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L.) Seeds by Sodium Nitroprusside under Drought Stress. Philipp. Agric. Sci. 2016, 99, 339–347. [Google Scholar]
  141. Rajjou, L.; Lovigny, Y.; Groot, S.P.C.; Belghazi, M.; Job, C.; Job, D. Proteome-Wide Characterization of Seed Aging in Arabidopsis: A Comparison between Artificial and Natural Aging Protocols. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 620–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Kurek, K.; Plitta-Michalak, B.; Ratajczak, E. Reactive Oxygen Species as Potential Drivers of the Seed Aging Process. Plants 2019, 8, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Fu, Y.-B. Analysis of Stored MRNA Degradation in Acceleratedly Aged Seeds of Wheat and Canola in Comparison to Arabidopsis. Plants 2020, 9, 1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zhao, L.; Wang, S.; Fu, Y.-B.; Wang, H. Arabidopsis Seed Stored MRNAs Are Degraded Constantly over Aging Time, as Revealed by New Quantification Methods. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ciacka, K.; Tyminski, M.; Wal, A.; Gniazdowska, A.; Krasuska, U. Nitric Oxide—An Antidote to Seed Aging Modifies Meta-Tyrosine Content and Expression of Aging-Linked Genes in Apple Embryos. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ipson, B.R.; Fisher, A.L. Roles of the Tyrosine Isomers Meta-Tyrosine and Ortho-Tyrosine in Oxidative Stress. Ageing Res. Rev. 2016, 27, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Tyminski, M.; Ciacka, K.; Staszek, P.; Gniazdowska, A.; Krasuska, U. Toxicity of Meta-Tyrosine. Plants 2021, 10, 2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Pérez-Pérez, M.E.; Lemaire, S.D.; Crespo, J.L. Reactive Oxygen Species and Autophagy in Plants and Algae. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Xiong, Y.; Sheen, J. The Role of Target of Rapamycin Signaling Networks in Plant Growth and Metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Liu, Y.; Bassham, D.C. TOR Is a Negative Regulator of Autophagy in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kravchenko, A.; Citerne, S.; Jéhanno, I.; Bersimbaev, R.I.; Veit, B.; Meyer, C.; Leprince, A.-S. Mutations in the Arabidopsis Lst8 and Raptor Genes Encoding Partners of the TOR Complex, or Inhibition of TOR Activity Decrease Abscisic Acid (ABA) Synthesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 467, 992–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The cumulative annual publication count of papers on NO in plant science. Details of the search are available in the Supplementary Materials.
Figure 1. The cumulative annual publication count of papers on NO in plant science. Details of the search are available in the Supplementary Materials.
Ijms 23 14951 g001
Figure 2. The cumulative annual publication count of papers on NO and seeds. Details of the search are described in the Supplementary Materials.
Figure 2. The cumulative annual publication count of papers on NO and seeds. Details of the search are described in the Supplementary Materials.
Ijms 23 14951 g002
Figure 3. NO (mostly SNP)-induced changes observed after seed priming or seed presoaking resulting in stimulation of seed germination and enhancement of seedling growth under unfavourable environmental conditions. The order of incidents shown in the figure does not reflect the actual sequence of events.
Figure 3. NO (mostly SNP)-induced changes observed after seed priming or seed presoaking resulting in stimulation of seed germination and enhancement of seedling growth under unfavourable environmental conditions. The order of incidents shown in the figure does not reflect the actual sequence of events.
Ijms 23 14951 g003
Figure 4. RNS (NO)-induced changes leading to seed dormancy removal and stimulation of seed germination. The order of changes marked in the figure does not reflect the actual sequence of events. Predicted but unproven changes are indicated in boxes with dashed lines.
Figure 4. RNS (NO)-induced changes leading to seed dormancy removal and stimulation of seed germination. The order of changes marked in the figure does not reflect the actual sequence of events. Predicted but unproven changes are indicated in boxes with dashed lines.
Ijms 23 14951 g004
Figure 5. Changes observed after treatment of aged seeds with NO (SNP or other donors) leading to the restoration of seed metabolism, resulting in the removal of typical physiological features of seed aging (low vigour and low germinability). The course of events indicated in the figure does not reflect their actual sequence.
Figure 5. Changes observed after treatment of aged seeds with NO (SNP or other donors) leading to the restoration of seed metabolism, resulting in the removal of typical physiological features of seed aging (low vigour and low germinability). The course of events indicated in the figure does not reflect their actual sequence.
Ijms 23 14951 g005
Table 1. The most commonly used NO donors.
Table 1. The most commonly used NO donors.
NO DonorReleased MoleculesConditions of NO ReleaseReferences
Sodium nitroprusside
(SNP, sodium nitroferricyanide(III) dihydrate)
NO+, CN, a mixture of ferrocyanide and ferricyanide productsPhotolysis after irradiation with UV-Vis light (except red light).
Reaction with reducing agents (e.g., thiols, haemoproteins, and ascorbate) in darkness.
[23,24,25]
RSNO compounds, e.g.,
S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D-penicillamine (SNAP)
S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO)
NO, NO+, NO,
disulphide
Disruption by heat; UV light; and some metal ions, superoxides, and seleno compounds. Metal ions (Cu+, Fe2+, Hg2+, and Ag+) serve as important catalysts for the decomposition of the compounds.[26,27]
3-Morpholinosydnonimine
(SIN-1)
NO, O2•−, ONOO,
SIN-1C
Decomposition occurs under alkaline pH and is facilitated by oxygen and Vis light irradiation.
In vivo, oxidizing agents stimulate NO production from SIN-1 at low oxygen concentrations.
Under such conditions, SIN-1 is likely to behave more like an NO donor than an ONOO donor.
[23,26,28]
Diazeniumdiolates
(NONOates), e.g.,
Diethylenetriamine NONOate (DETA-NONOate, alternative name NOC-18),
NO, NO+, NO, NO2,
nucleophile residue
Decomposition is spontaneous and pH- and temperature-dependent. Dissociation to NO is acid-catalysed, and the rate decreases as the pH increases.[29,30]
Angeli’ salt
(sodium α-oxyhyponitrite, belongs to the NONOate compounds)
NO, OH, HNOSpontaneous dissociation in a pH-dependent manner.[26]
Acidified nitrite2NO2 + 2H+⇌ N2O3 + H2O
N2O3⇌ NO2 + NO
The reaction requires a high NO2 concentration and low pH or the presence of the reductants. e.g., ascorbate. Under less acidic pH, the reduction of NO2 to NO is catalysed by metalloproteins (e.g., haemoglobin).[31,32]
Roussin’s black salt ((KFe4S3(NO)7), the tetra-iron–sulfur-nitrosyl cluster)NO * and ferric precipitatesPhotolysis at λ increases from 313 to 546 nm.[33]
* The form of NO was not specified.
Table 2. NO-dependent changes in the expression of genes related to ABA metabolism and signalling in seeds or siliques.
Table 2. NO-dependent changes in the expression of genes related to ABA metabolism and signalling in seeds or siliques.
GeneChanges in Gene
Expression
Plant MaterialGeneral Description of the Material and ResultsReferences
BiosynthesisNCED6↑/↓Hedge mustard
seeds
Upregulated at 3 h and downregulated at 22 and 26 h of imbibition of non-after-ripened seeds in 20 mM KNO3.[83]
NCED9Upregulated at 12 h and downregulated at 22 and 26 h of imbibition of non-after-ripened seeds in 20 mM KNO3.
NCED5Hedge mustard
seeds
Among tested NCED, NCED5 expression the highest during imbibition of 7-month after-ripened seeds and the most affected by 20 mM KNO3.[88]
NCED6Stimulated by 20 mM KNO3 only between 22 and 26 h of imbibition of 7-months after-ripened seeds.
NCED9
NCED3Apple seedsDownregulated in axes of embryos after 3 h of fumigation with vapours of acidified 20 mM NaNO2.[84]
NCED9
DegradationCYP707A2Arabidopsis seedsIncreased between 3 and 48 h of imbibition after 200 µM SNP application.[89]
CYP707A1Arabidopsis
siliques
Downregulated at 15, 19, and 22 d after flowering and was higher in siliques from a mother plant treated with 10 mM NO3 compared to the plant treated with 3 mM NO3. [80]
CYP707A2Increased at 19 and 22 d after flowering and was higher in siliques from a mother plant treated with 10 mM NO3 compared to the plant treated with 3 mM NO3.
CYP707A2Hedge mustard
seeds
Upregulated between 3 and 22 h of imbibition of non-after-ripened seeds in 20 mM KNO3.[83]
CYP707A2Hedge mustard
seeds
Increased between 3 and 26 h of imbibition of 7-months after-ripened seeds in 20 mM KNO3.[88]
CYP707A1=Apple
seeds
Observed in axes of embryos after 3 h of fumigation with vapours of acidified 20 mM NaNO2.[84]
CYP707A2
SignallingRCAR3Apple
seeds
Observed in axes of embryos after 3 h of fumigation with vapours of acidified 20 mM NaNO2.[84]
ABF
ABI5↑/↓Hedge mustard
seeds
Increased at 12 h and decreased at 3 and 26 h of imbibition of non-after-ripened seeds in 20 mM KNO3.[83]
ABI5Hedge mustard
seeds
Stimulated by 20 mM KNO3 between 6 and 22 h of imbibition of 7-months after-ripened seeds.[88]
↑ upregulation, ↓ downregulation, = no changes in gene expression.
Table 3. NO-dependent changes in the expression of genes related to GA metabolism and signalling in seeds.
Table 3. NO-dependent changes in the expression of genes related to GA metabolism and signalling in seeds.
GeneChanges in Gene
Expression
Plant MaterialGeneral Description of the Material
and Results
References
BiosynthesisGA3ox2Hedge mustard
seeds
Downregulated at 3, 6, 22, and 26 h of imbibition of non-after-ripened seeds in 20 mM KNO3.[80]
GA20ox2↑↓Upregulated only at 3 h and downregulated after 6, 12, and 26 h of imbibition of non-after-ripened seeds in 20 mM KNO3.
GA2ox6Downregulated after 22 and 26 h of imbibition of non-after-ripened seeds in 20 mM KNO3.
GA3ox2Hedge mustard
seeds
Stimulated by 20 mM KNO3, especially at 22 and 26 h of imbibition of 7-months after-ripened seeds.[81]
GA20ox2Upregulated between 6 and 26 h of imbibition of 7-month after-ripened seeds treated with 20 mM KNO3.
GA2ox6
GA3ox1Arabidopsis seedsCN alleviates the dormancy of Arabidopsis seeds. Seed treatment with 200 µM cPTIO reduced gene expression compared with single CN application.[85]
GA3ox2
SignallingRGL2Hedge mustard
seeds
Downregulated after 22 and 26 h of imbibition of non-after-ripened seeds in 20 mM KNO3.[80]
RGL2Hedge mustard
seeds
In 7-months after-ripened seeds, expression was negatively affected by 20 mM KNO3 at 6 and 22 h of imbibition.[81]
↑ upregulation, ↓ downregulation.
Table 4. NO-dependent changes in the expression of genes related to ET metabolism and signalling in seeds.
Table 4. NO-dependent changes in the expression of genes related to ET metabolism and signalling in seeds.
GeneChanges in Gene
Expression
Plant MaterialGeneral Description of the Material
and Results
References
BiosynthesisACS7Hedge mustard
seeds
After 20 mM KNO3 treatment, the ACS7 transcript was expressed only at the beginning of imbibition (3 h) in seeds that were not after-ripened, and after-ripening eliminated this expression.[86]
ACO2↑/↓After 20 mM KNO3 treatment, the transcript level was very high in non-after-ripened seeds at 3 h of imbibition and strongly diminished up to 12 h, increasing afterwards; after-ripening reduced transcript accumulation during the first 6 h of imbibition.
ACS1Wild cabbage
seeds
Upregulated between 12 and 48 h of imbibition in seeds treated with 5 mM NO.[72]
ACS3
ACS7
ACS11
ACS9Increased at 12 and 24 h of imbibition of seeds treated with 5 mM NO.
ACS4Decreased between 12 and 48 h of imbibition in seeds treated with 5 mM NO.
ACS5
ACO1↓/↑Downregulated after 12 h and upregulated after 24 and 36 h of imbibition in seeds treated with 5 mM NO.
SignallingETR1Wild cabbage
seeds
Upregulated between 12 and 48 h of imbibition in seeds treated with 5 mM NO.
[72]
ETR2
↑ upregulation, ↓ downregulation.
Table 5. NO-dependent changes in the expression of genes related to JA metabolism and signalling in seeds.
Table 5. NO-dependent changes in the expression of genes related to JA metabolism and signalling in seeds.
GeneChanges in Gene
Expression
Plant MaterialGeneral Description of the Material and ResultsReferences
BiosynthesisAOS1Apple
seeds
Observed in axes of embryos after 3 h of fumigation with vapours of acidified 20 mM NaNO2.[82]
Derivative formationJMT
JAR1
SignallingJAZ3
↑ upregulation, ↓ downregulation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ciacka, K.; Staszek, P.; Sobczynska, K.; Krasuska, U.; Gniazdowska, A. Nitric Oxide in Seed Biology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314951

AMA Style

Ciacka K, Staszek P, Sobczynska K, Krasuska U, Gniazdowska A. Nitric Oxide in Seed Biology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(23):14951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314951

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ciacka, Katarzyna, Pawel Staszek, Katarzyna Sobczynska, Urszula Krasuska, and Agnieszka Gniazdowska. 2022. "Nitric Oxide in Seed Biology" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 23: 14951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314951

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop