Next Article in Journal
Non-Muscle MLCK Contributes to Endothelial Cell Hyper-Proliferation through the ERK Pathway as a Mechanism for Vascular Remodeling in Pulmonary Hypertension
Next Article in Special Issue
Biocatalysis: An Eco-Friendly Scenario for the Manufacturing of APIs
Previous Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicle (EVs) Associated Non-Coding RNAs in Lung Cancer and Therapeutics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rational Design of a Thermostable 2′-Deoxyribosyltransferase for Nelarabine Production by Prediction of Disulfide Bond Engineering Sites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic Multi-Enzymatic System for Cladribine Manufacturing

1
Applied Biotechnology Group, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Urbanización El Bosque, Calle Tajo, s/n, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain
2
Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Poznan University of Technology, Berdychowo 4, PL-60695 Poznan, Poland
3
Chair of Molecular Biotechnology, Institute for Microbiology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 20b, 01217 Dresden, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(21), 13634; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113634
Submission received: 17 October 2022 / Revised: 4 November 2022 / Accepted: 5 November 2022 / Published: 7 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocatalysis: An Eco-Friendly Scenario for the Manufacturing of APIs)

Abstract

:
Enzyme-mediated processes have proven to be a valuable and sustainable alternative to traditional chemical methods. In this regard, the use of multi-enzymatic systems enables the realization of complex synthetic schemes, while also introducing a number of additional advantages, including the conversion of reversible reactions into irreversible processes, the partial or complete elimination of product inhibition problems, and the minimization of undesirable by-products. In addition, the immobilization of biocatalysts on magnetic supports allows for easy reusability and streamlines the downstream process. Herein we have developed a cascade system for cladribine synthesis based on the sequential action of two magnetic biocatalysts. For that purpose, purine 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase from Leishmania mexicana (LmPDT) and Escherichia coli hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (EcHPRT) were immobilized onto Ni2+-prechelated magnetic microspheres (MagReSyn®NTA). Among the resulting derivatives, MLmPDT3 (activity: 11,935 IU/gsupport, 63% retained activity, operational conditions: 40 °C and pH 5–7) and MEcHPRT3 (12,840 IU/gsupport, 45% retained activity, operational conditions: pH 5–8 and 40–60 °C) emerge as optimal catalysts for further synthetic application. Moreover, the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system was biochemically characterized and successfully applied to the one-pot synthesis of cladribine under various conditions. This methodology not only displayed a 1.67-fold improvement in cladribine synthesis (compared to MLmPDT3), but it also implied a practically complete transformation of the undesired by-product into a high-added-value product (90% conversion of Hyp into IMP). Finally, MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 was reused for 16 cycles, which displayed a 75% retained activity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the partial or total replacement of environmentally unfriendly and tedious chemical procedures by enzyme-mediated processes is considered common practice in pharma industries [1,2,3]. Enzymatic synthesis of nucleic acid derivatives (nucleosides and nucleotides) is a clear example of how biocatalysis offers an eco-friendly, regio-, stereo-, and enantioselective alternative to traditional multi-step and environmentally harmful chemical processes [4,5,6,7]. To this effect, a wide variety of enzymes have been employed as practical catalysts for the mono and multi-enzymatic synthesis of NAs, including nucleoside phosphorylases [8,9], 2′-deoxyribosyltransferases [4,5,10], phosphoribosyltransferases [11,12,13], and nucleoside kinases [14,15,16], among others.
Cladribine (Mavenclad, 2-chloro-2′-deoxyadenosine) is a clinical drug for the treatment of hairy cell lymphoid and myeloid leukemia [17] which has also received EMA and FDA approval for the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) [18]. Due to its broad clinical applicability, the development of novel, efficient and eco-friendly alternatives to classical chemical methods are gaining ground. Among them, bioprocesses based on enzymatic transglycosylation from a nucleoside donor to a nucleobase acceptor catalyzed by 2′-deoxyribosyltransferases (NDTs), or nucleoside phosphorylases (NPs), are the most habitual strategies [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Of these, we focused our attention on NDTs.
Traditionally, NDTs were classified as type I NDTs (PDT), which perform the transglycosylation reaction between purines; and type II NDTs (NDT), which act on pyrimidines and purines [4,5]. Interestingly, NDTs display high chemo-, regio-, and/or enantioselectivity while converting a broad range of natural and modified bases [4,5]. However, despite this enzymatic approach vastly surpassing chemical procedures, in terms of efficiency (one-pot regio- and enantioselective reaction), or sustainability (green conditions, aqueous buffers), several operational constraints must be addressed from an industrial perspective.
A major problem that hinders the industrial implementation of the bioprocesses is the high costs involved in the production and purification of recombinant enzymes. In this respect, enzyme immobilization offers the possibility to reuse the biocatalysts and, therefore, overcome this undesired operational constraint. A comprehensive design of the immobilization process could modify or enhance various enzyme properties, such as thermal stability, activity, and specificity [27,28,29,30]. The use of magnetic matrices (micro or macro size) as supports for enzyme immobilization provides other additional advantages, such as an easy biocatalyst recovery and a simplification in the downstream process. Moreover, the use of magnetic stirring avoids any deterioration of the biocatalysts caused by mechanical agitation [31,32]. Each of these simplifies the operational processing and increases efficiency, leading to more cost-effective processes.
Equally important is the minimization of undesired by-products (those without economic interest) to simplify the downstream procedure. As a result of the transglycosylation (reaction 1), a second nucleobase is released into the reaction mixture, complicating the purification of the main product (Figure 1A). Moreover, if we consider that, most of the time, the reaction equilibrium in transglycosylation is not shifted towards product formation, up to four molecules are present in the solution. This involves an additional drawback for the purification and further processing. Le Chatelier’s principle states that a change in pressure, temperature, or concentration of products or reactants makes the equilibrium shift in the opposite direction to offset the change. As a consequence, a modification of the initial nucleoside/base ratio, or the conversion of the released nucleobase into other added-value molecules (inosine-5′-monophosphate, IMP) by a second enzyme (reaction 2), may contribute to a shift in the equilibrium of the main reaction (Figure 1B) [24].
In previous work, the sequential action of NDT from Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Thermus thermophilus HGXPRT demonstrated the feasibility of this cascade system [24]. Unfortunately, several operational problems, such as the partial conversion of nucleobase released into NMP by the TtHGPXRT, a shift of the equilibrium of the transglycosylation reaction below expectations, the mandatory production and purification of required enzymes, and the difficulty in separating the catalysts from the reaction medium, forced us to redesign and improve this cascade system.
Since the biocatalyst reusability and the absence of by-products are essential requisites for the industrial scale-up, herein we report the development of a magnetic multi-enzymatic system for cladribine manufacturing based on the sequential action of Leishmania mexicana purine 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase (LmPDT) [33] and E. coli K12 hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (EcHPRT) [34,35] (Figure 1).
To this end, LmPDT and EcHPRT were immobilized onto Ni2+-prechelated magnetic microspheres. The resulting magnetic catalysts (MLmPDT and MEcHPRT derivatives) were further optimized (catalyst loading, activity recovery) and biochemically characterized (effect of pH and T on enzyme activity). Among the different derivatives, MLmPDT3 (activity: 11,935 IU/gsupport, 63% retained activity, operational conditions: 40 °C and pH 5–7) and MEcHPRT3 (12,840 IU/gsupport, 45% retained activity, operational conditions: pH 5–8 and 40–60 °C) were selected as candidates for the envisioned magnetic multi-enzymatic system, MLmPDT/MEcHPRT. Finally, the proposed magnetic multi-enzymatic system, MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3, was assayed on the one-pot synthesis of cladribine from 2′-deoxyinosine (dIno) and 2-chloroadenine (2-ClAde) (Figure 1). As a major advantage, MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 displayed a 1.67-fold improvement of conversion in cladribine synthesis (referring to MLmPDT3), and it also allowed for the nearly total transformation (>90%) of the released nucleobase (an undesired by-product) into a second, high-added-value product (inosine-5′-monophosphate). Moreover, the effect of different parameters (pH, temperature, time course, MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 ratio) on cladribine production was also studied, displaying 40 °C, pH 7.0, 1.2 µg/0.4 µg (MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 ratio) and 10 min as optimal conditions. Finally, the magnetic multi-enzymatic system was reused for up to 16 cycles, maintaining ≈75% of initial activity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Enzyme Immobilization

As previously reported, the immobilization of His-tagged proteins onto Ni2+ pre-chelated matrices usually leads to a non-aggressive and oriented immobilization process which does not usually affect the enzyme activity [36,37]. On this basis, His-tagged LmPDT and His-tagged EcHPRT were immobilized onto Ni2+-chelated Fe2O3 porous microspheres (MagReSyn®NTA).
As shown in Table S1 (supplementary data), the preliminary catalyst load experiments (enzyme/support mass ratio) displayed MLmPDT3 (activity: 11,935 IU g−1biocat dAdo synthesis; activity recovery of 63%) as the strongest candidate for further experiments. Interestingly, MLmPDT3 displayed activity superior to other reported immobilized NDT derivatives, such as mutant PDT from Trypanosoma brucei NDT (TbPDT) immobilized onto Ni2+ pre-chelated spheres (MTbPDTV11S; 10,552 IU g−1; retained activity 54%) [37], wild type TbPDT immobilized onto glutaraldehyde-activated Fe2O3 microspheres (MTbPDT; 4200 IU g−1; retained activity 22%) [25], wild-type Lactobacillus reuteri NDT covalently immobilized onto epoxy-activated beads EC-EP303 (SLrNDT4; 65.4 IU g−1; retained activity 13.5%) [38,39], and onto glutaraldehyde activated magnetic chitosan beads (15 IU g−1; retained activity 27%) [40], or wild type Bacillus pshychrosaccharolyticus NDT immobilized onto PEI-functionalized agarose, cross-linked with aldehyde-dextran (2.2 IU g−1; retained activity 36%) [41,42].
Furthermore, among the MEcHPRT derivatives, MEcHPRT3 was chosen as the optimal derivative (Table S1) (activity: 12,840 IU g−1biocat in IMP synthesis; activity recovery of 45%). As happened with MLmPDT3, MEcHPRT3 displayed activity superior to other previously immobilized purine PRTs, such as HGXPRT or APRT from Thermus thermophilus covalently immobilized onto glutaraldehyde-activated Fe2O3 microspheres (MTtHGXPRT3, activity 1581, IU g−1biocat, retained activity 29%; MTtAPRT2B, activity 480 IU g−1biocat, retained activity 52%; MTtAPRT2B, activity 507 IU g−1biocat, retained activity 44%) [13,43].

2.2. Biochemical Characterization of Immobilized Derivatives

To determine the most appropriate operational condition for implementing the magnetic MLmPDT/MEcHPRT system, the effect of pH and temperature on catalyst activity was assayed for both derivatives separately. MLmPDT3 displayed maximum activity when incubated in 50 mM MES buffer, pH 6.0 at 40 °C (Figure 2A,B). However, it must be highlighted that MLmPDT3 also displayed higher activity (>75%) in the pH range 6–7. Regarding MEcHPRT3, the magnetic derivative displayed maximum activity at 50 °C. MEcHPRT3 also showed high activity (>80%) in a broad range of temperatures (40–60 °C) and pH (5–7). Based on these preliminary results, pH 6.0–7.0 and 40 °C were initially selected as starting conditions for the further implementation of MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3.

2.3. Biochemical Characterization of the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 System

Once the preliminary operational conditions were proposed, we assayed the effects of pH and temperature on the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system to determine the optimal conditions for cladribine synthesis. As shown in Figure 3A, the multi-enzymatic systems exhibit >80% relative activity in a temperature range of 40 to 50 °C, with a peak at 50 °C. Although MLmPDT3 suffered a significant activity loss at temperature values above 40 °C (Figure 2A), MEcHPRT3 was found to be active (>90% relative activity) in the 40–60 °C range, with a peak at 50 °C (Figure 2C). Overall, the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system possesses a higher operability (compared to MLmPDT3). This is probably associated with the conversion of the released Hyp into IMP, which contributes to shifting the equilibrium of the main reaction towards cladribine production.
Regarding the effect of pH on the activity of the cascade system, the experimental results are in line with the consensus conditions previously predicted (see above), displaying optimal activity when 50 mM Tris-HCl or 50 mM sodium phosphate were used as reaction buffers. However, due to the phosphate buffer’s capacity to react with some divalent metal cations (leading to enzyme inhibition), including Ca2+ and Mg2+, we selected Tris-HCl pH 7 as the optimal reaction buffer for further thermostability studies.

2.4. Thermal Stability of the Magnetic MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 System

One of the most essential features to be considered in the deployment of enzymes for large-scale industrial applications is the stability of biocatalysts under operational conditions. In this way, selecting non-appropriate reaction conditions may lead to lower enzyme stability, a shorter lifespan, and poor catalytic performance. To this end, we assay the operational stability of the immobilized MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system when stored at 40 °C and 50 °C in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.
As shown in Figure 4, a four-fold enhanced, long-term stability is observed when stored at 40 °C (t1/240 °C ≈ 4 h, t1/250 °C ≈ 1 h). Thus, even though previous preliminary results suggested selecting 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7, and 50 °C (Figure 3) as the most appropriate reaction conditions, the thermal study of magnetic MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 revealed 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7 and 40 °C as optimal conditions (Figure 4).
Although enzyme immobilization has been extensively used to improve the stability of biocatalysts, the developed MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system displayed relatively low thermostability. In fact, as previously reported, soluble LmPDT displayed higher thermostability (100% retained activity when stored in 50 mM MES buffer, pH 6.5 at 40 °C) when compared to the multi-enzymatic system. Given these results, the immobilization process through IMAC methodologies could affect the multimeric assembly of the enzyme, triggering the disassociation of the subunits [29,44,45]. In this sense, subunit disassociation stands out as a complex issue causing enzyme inactivation and therefore affects enzyme stability. Moreover, since matrices for IMAC immobilization are not physically inert, different multi-punctual adsorptions (hydrophobicity or ionic interactions, among others) between the protein and support can also occur, affecting protein folding and, thus, the biocatalyst stability [29,44,45].

2.5. Application of the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 System in Manufacturing Cladribine and IMP

Despite the enzymatic synthesis of Cladribine catalyzed by NDTs or NPs having been extensively described in publications [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26], the presence of released nucleobase (reaction 1, Figure 1) is an operational constraint that hampers the final downstream processing, and therefore, the industrial implementation of the process. Herein we propose a tentative solution for this operational drawback based on applying a magnetic cascade system. To this end, we initially compared the transglycosylation capability of MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 and MLmPDT3 on cladribine synthesis from dIno (2′-deoxyribose donor) and 2-ClAde (acceptor) (Table 1) (reaction 1); and additionally, we quantified the IMP formation (reaction 2) from released Hyp (acceptor) and PRPP (ribose-5′-phosphate donor). The experimental results revealed a 1.3-fold enhancement in cladribine production (Table 1) and, more interestingly, a 75% conversion of released Hyp into IMP, an added-value compound used as an additive in the food industry [12,46].
After verifying the consistency of the initial hypothesis, the next step was to evaluate the influence of different operational parameters affecting the potential scale-up of the bioprocess. To start with, different time-course curves at different MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 ratios were performed under the previously determined reaction conditions (Figure 5).
As shown in Figure 5, ratios 1.2/0.4 and 1.2/0.2 (MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3) lead to a 1.67-fold increase of cladribine production at 20 min (referred to MLmPDT3, Table 1). Additionally, a 90% conversion of released Hyp into IMP was observed when using a 1.2/0.4 ratio, which considerably improved (up 1.2-fold) results displayed for the initial conditions (0.6/0.2 ratio, 75%) (Table 1). Interestingly, the experimental results revealed no significant differences at 10 min (59% conversion of dIno into cladribine, 90% conversion of released Hyp into IMP). Considering these features, the 1.2/0.4 ratio and 10 min were selected as the optimal conditions for the reusability experiments.
As some of the major drawbacks for the industrial implementation of bioprocesses are the high cost of producing enzymes and the difficulty in recovering and reusing the biocatalyst, the reusability of the magnetic MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system was addressed (Figure 5). As shown in Figure 6, the magnetic MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system maintained around 75% of the initial 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase activity (reaction 1, cladribine synthesis) during 16 cycles and also displayed around 60% of retained activity after 21 cycles. These results conform with experimental results derived from thermal inactivation curves (t1/240 °C ≈ 4 h, Figure 4).
It must be noted that no loss of phosphoribosyltransferase activity (reaction 2, IMP production) was observed, suggesting MEcHPRT3 remains stable under operational conditions. So, according to experimental data, an improvement of MLmPDT3 stability may lead to an increase in the long-term stability of the cascade system (ongoing work).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Cell culture medium reagents were from Difco (St. Louis, United States). Moreover, HPLC solvents and buffers were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain). All other reagents, nucleosides, and nucleobases used in this work were provided by Carbosynth Ltd. (Compton, UK).

3.2. Gene Expression and Protein Purification

All the DNA constructions were obtained from Genscript (Piscataway, United States) as NdeI-EcoRI fragments subcloned into the expression vector pET28b(+). The recombinant plasmids were used to transform E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells under the conditions described elsewhere [47]. Moreover, the overexpression of Leishmania mexicana His-tag NDT (UniProtKB E9AWJ0) and Escherichia coli His-tag HPRT (UniProtKB P0A9M2), and the cell extract preparation for protein purification were performed following the previous protocol reported by Acosta et al. [24,47].
The cleared lysates were loaded onto a 5-mL HisTrap FF column (GE Healthcare), pre-equilibrated in a binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, with 100 mM NaCl and 20 mM imidazole) using an ÄKTA Prime FPLC (GE Healthcare). Bound proteins were eluted using a linear gradient of imidazole (20–500 mM). Fractions containing proteins of interest were identified by SDS-PAGE, pooled, concentrated, and loaded onto a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 prep grade column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7. Fractions with the protein of interest were identified by SDS-PAGE (Figure S1). The protein concentration was determined spectrophotometrically by UV absorption 280 nm using a using ε280 = 9065 M−1cm−1 and ε280 = 9065 M−1cm−1 for LmPDT and EcHPRT, respectively.

3.3. Enzyme Immobilization

LmPDT and EcHPRT were immobilized separately onto MagReSyn®NTA magnetic microbeads (ReSyn Biosciences, Pretoria, South Africa). For this procedure, 20 μL of commercial microparticles suspensions (25 mg/mL) were washed and equilibrated three times with 200 μL binding buffer (80 mM phosphate buffer, 40 mM imidazole, 1 M NaCl, pH 8.0). Subsequently, immobilization was carried out in a final volume of 200 μL using different amounts of LmPDT (60–100 μg) or EcHPRT (60–140 μg). The enzyme solution with the binding buffer was adjusted to 10 times the volume of the initial beads suspension. The enzyme and beads suspensions were incubated for 20 min at room temperature in a roller shaker from J.P.Selecta (Barcelona, Spain). After the binding, the supernatant was removed with the assistance of a magnet and stored for catalyst load determination. Then, microparticles were washed three times with washing buffer (80 mM phosphate buffer, 1 M NaCl, pH 8.0) to remove non-affinity bound enzymes. Finally, beads were resuspended in 200 μL of 10 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0 (for LmPDT immobilization) and 200 μL of 20 mM Tris-HCL buffer pH 8.0 (for EcHPRT) and stored at 4 °C. Immobilization yields were determined by SDS-PAGE densitometry, based on the difference between protein blanks and immobilization supernatants, using a ChemiDoc unit (Bio-Rad) and Image LabTM software.

3.4. N-Deoxyribosyltransferase Assay

The standard assay for soluble LmPDT was carried out using 0.3 μg of the pure enzyme with 10 mM substrates (dIno and Ade) in 50 mM MES buffer, pH 6.5 (reaction volume 40 μL) at 40 °C for 5 min (300 rpm). Then the reaction was stopped as previously described [33] and the samples were half-diluted with water for HPLC analysis. One unit of activity (U) was established as the amount of enzyme (mg) that produces 1 μmol of dAdo per min (IU).
The standard assay for MLmPDT derivatives was carried out using 0.6 μg of the immobilized enzyme under the aforementioned reaction conditions in a final volume of 80 μL. For immobilized derivatives, one unit of activity (U) was established as the amount of derivative (g) that produces 1 μmol of product per min (IU).
All the determinations were made in triplicate, with the highest error being less than 5%.

3.5. Phosphoribosyltransferase Activity Assay

The standard phosphoribosyltransferase activity assay for soluble EcHPRT was performed by incubating 0.25 µg of the pure enzyme with a 40 µL solution containing 10 mM PRPP, 10 mM Hyp, 12 mM MgCl2 in 12 mM Tris-HCl pH 8 at 50 °C and 300 r.p.m. for 5–10 min. After this, the enzyme was inactivated as previously described [12], and the IMP production was analyzed and quantitatively measured using HPLC. All determinations were carried out in triplicate, and the maximum error was less than 5%. Under such conditions, one activity unit (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme (mg) producing 1 μmol/min (IU) of IMP under the assay conditions.
Like MLmPDT, the standard assay for MEcHPRT was adapted from the activity assay of the soluble enzyme. Accordingly, 0.5 μg of the immobilized enzyme was incubated under the aforementioned reaction conditions in a final volume of 80 μL. For immobilized derivatives, one unit of activity (U) was established as the amount of derivative (g) that produces 1 μmol of IMP per min (IU).
All the determinations were made in triplicate, with the highest error being less than 5%.

3.6. Biochemical Characterization of Immobilized Derivatives

To establish the optimal operational conditions for the MLmPDT and MEcHPRT derivatives, the effect of pH and temperature on the activity of the biocatalyst was assayed. The influence of pH on catalyst activity was tested using different reaction buffers (50 mM sodium citrate, pH 3–6; 50 mM MES, pH 6–7; 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7–9; 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6–8; 50 mM sodium borate, pH 8–10) under standard assay conditions. Similarly, the effect of temperature on catalyst activity was assayed across the 20–80 °C range.

3.7. MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 Standard Assay

To deepen the potential applicability of MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 as catalysts for the industrial production of nucleosides, the enzyme-mediated synthesis of cladribine was selected as a reaction of interest. In this respect, the reactions were carried out by incubating 0.6 μg of immobilized LmPDT (MLmPDT3) and 0.2 μg of immobilized EcHPRT (MEcHPRT3) with 1 mM dIno, 1 mM 2-Clade, 1 mM PRPP, and 1.2 MgCl2, in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, in a final volume of 80 μL, with 300 rpm orbital shaking for 20 min.
All of the determinations were made in triplicate, with the highest error being less than 5%.

3.8. Biochemical Characterization of the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 System

The effects of pH and temperature on the activity and stability of the multi-enzymatic system were also assayed to determine the optimal conditions. On one hand, the effect of pH on catalyst activity was assayed using various reaction buffers (50 mM sodium citrate, pH 3–6; 50 mM MES, pH 6–7; 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7–9; 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6–8; and 50 mM sodium borate, pH 8–10) under standard assay conditions. On the other hand, the temperature dependence of MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 was evaluated across the 20–80 °C range.

3.9. Thermal Inactivation of the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 System

Once the optimal conditions were determined, the long-term operational stability of the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system was also assayed by incubating both derivatives simultaneously at 40 °C and 50 °C for 24 h in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7. Periodically, aliquots were taken, and the activity was measured under the optimal conditions determined after the biochemical characterization.

3.10. Application of the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 System in the Manufacturing of Cladribine and IMP

To evaluate the potential applicability of the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system on cladribine synthesis, different operational aspects were studied. Firstly, a comparative study of enzyme-mediated synthesis of cladribine catalyzed by MLmPDT3 and MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 was proposed under similar conditions. To this end, 0.6 μg of immobilized LmPDT (or 0.6 μg immobilized LmPDT and 0.2 μg of immobilized EcHPRT), was incubated with 1 mM dIno, 1 mM 2-ClAde (including 1 mM PRPP and 1.2 MgCl2 for the multi-enzymatic system), in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, in a final volume of 80 μL, with 300 rpm orbital shaking for 20 min. After demonstrating the benefits of using the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system instead of MLmPDT3, diverse time-course reaction curves at different MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 ratios were performed for the optimization of the bioprocess.
Finally, the reusability of the multi-enzymatic system was studied by using the magnetic derivatives for 21 consecutive 10 min reactions in cladribine synthesis. After each use, the magnetic derivatives were recovered by an imposed magnetic field and washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0. Then, the recovered derivatives were introduced into a fresh reaction medium and reused again.

3.11. Analytical Methods

The quantitative determination of products was performed by HPLC analysis using an ACE EXCEL 5 μm CN-ES 250 × 4.6 mm equilibrated, with 0.1 M triethyl ammonium acetate at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Retention times for natural bases, nucleosides, and NMPs (abbreviated according to the recommendations of the IUPAC) were as follows; Hypoxanthine (Hyp), 9 min; 2′-deoxyinosine (dIno), 10.8 min; inosine-5′-monophosphate (IMP), 5.3 min; 2-chloroadenine (2-ClAde), 15.8 min; cladribine, 18.5 min; adenine (Ade): 10 min; and 2′-deoxyadenosine (dAdo), 15 min.

4. Conclusions

Herein, the functional characterization of an immobilized cascade system for cladribine manufacturing based on the sequential actions of two magnetic biocatalysts is presented. Moreover, the application of this multi-enzymatic system also demonstrated other advantages, such as the minimization of undesired by-products, the generation of other added-value molecules, the shifting of the equilibrium of the transglycosylation, and easy separation of the catalysts from the reaction medium.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232113634/s1.

Author Contributions

C.L. and J.F.-L. are mainly responsible for the experiment design and for coordinating the research. G.C., L.P.S., M.B., L.E., C.L. and J.F.-L. contributed to the development and analysis of the experimental data and manuscript writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (grant PID2020-117025RB-I00), the National Science Centre, Poland (grant 2020/37/K/ST8/03805), and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (grant LO 2678/2-1).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fernández-Lucas, J.; Camarasa, M.J. (Eds.) Enzymatic and Chemical Synthesis of Nucleic acid Derivatives; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Simić, S.; Zukić, E.; Schmermund, L.; Faber, K.; Winkler, C.K.; Kroutil, W. Shortening synthetic routes to small molecule active pharmaceutical ingredients employing biocatalytic methods. Chem. Rev. 2021, 122, 1052–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wu, S.; Snajdrova, R.; Moore, J.C.; Baldenius, K.; Bornscheuer, U.T. Biocatalysis: Enzymatic synthesis for industrial applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 88–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lapponi, M.J.; Rivero, C.W.; Zinni, M.A.; Britos, C.N.; Trelles, J.A. New developments in nucleoside analogues biosynthesis: A review. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2016, 133, 218–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Del Arco, J.; Acosta, J.; Fernández-Lucas, J. New trends in the biocatalytic production of nucleosidic active pharmaceutical ingredients using 2′-deoxyribosyltransferases. Biotechnol. Adv. 2021, 51, 107701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mikhailopulo, I.A.; Miroshnikov, A.I. New trends in nucleoside biotechnology. Acta Nat. 2010, 2, 36–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lewkowicz, E.S.; Iribarren, A.M. Whole cell biocatalysts for the preparation of nucleosides and their derivatives. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 6851–6878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rinaldi, F.; Fernández-Lucas, J.; de la Fuente, D.; Zheng, C.; Bavaro, T.; Peters, B.; Massolini, G.; Annunziata, F.; Conti, P.; De la Mata, I.; et al. Immobilized enzyme reactors based on nucleoside phosphorylases and 2’-deoxyribosyltransferase for the in-flow synthesis of pharmaceutically relevant nucleoside analogues. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 307, 123258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kamel, S.; Weiß, M.; Klare, H.F.; Mikhailopulo, I.A.; Neubauer, P.; Wagner, A. Chemo-enzymatic synthesis of α-D-pentofuranose-1-phosphates using thermostable pyrimidine nucleoside phosphorylases. Mol. Catal. 2018, 458, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fresco-Taboada, A.; De La Mata, I.; Arroyo, M.; Fernández-Lucas, J. New insights on nucleoside 2′-deoxyribosyltransferases: A versatile biocatalyst for one-pot one-step synthesis of nucleoside analogs. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 3773–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Del Arco, J.; Fernández-Lucas, J. Purine and pyrimidine phosphoribosyltransferases: A versatile tool for enzymatic synthesis of nucleoside-5′-monophosphates. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 6898–6912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Del Arco, J.; Cejudo-Sanches, J.; Esteban, I.; Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Hormigo, D.; Perona, A.; Fernández-Lucas, J. Enzymatic production of dietary nucleotides from low-soluble purine bases by an efficient, thermostable and alkali-tolerant biocatalyst. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Del Arco, J.; Pérez, E.; Naitow, H.; Kunishima, N.; Fernández-Lucas, J. Structural and functional characterization of thermostable biocatalysts for the synthesis of 6-aminopurine nucleoside-5′-monophospate analogues. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 276, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mikhailopulo, I.A.; Miroshnikov, A.I. Biologically important nucleosides: Modern trends in Biotechnology and application. Mendeleev Commun. 2011, 21, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Frisch, J.; Maršić, T.; Loderer, C. A novel one-pot enzyme cascade for the biosynthesis of cladribine triphosphate. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ding, Y.; Ou, L.; Ding, Q. Enzymatic synthesis of nucleoside triphosphates and deoxynucleoside triphosphates by surface-displayed kinases. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 190, 1271–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Spurgeon, S.; Yu, M.; Phillips, J.D.; Epner, E.M. Cladribine: Not just another purine analogue? Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2002, 18, 1169–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Biernacki, T.; Sandi, D.; Bencsik, K.; Vécsei, L. Medicinal chemistry of multiple sclerosis: Focus on cladribine. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Britos, C.N.; Lapponi, M.J.; Cappa, V.A.; Rivero, C.W.; Trelles, J.A. Biotransformation of halogenated nucleosides by immobilized Lactobacillus animalis 2′-N-deoxyribosyltransferase. J. Fluor. Chem. 2016, 186, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Drenichev, M.S.; Alexeev, C.S.; Kurochkin, N.N.; Mikhailov, S.N. Use of nucleoside phosphorylases for the preparation of purine and pyrimidine 2′-deoxynucleosides. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, G.; Cheng, T.; Chu, J.; Li, S.; He, B. Efficient synthesis of purine nucleoside analogs by a new trimeric purine nucleoside phosphorylase from Aneurinibacillus migulanus AM007. Molecules 2020, 25, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rabuffetti, M.; Bavaro, T.; Semproli, R.; Cattaneo, G.; Massone, M.; Morelli, C.F.; Speranza, G.; Ubiali, D. Synthesis of ribavirin, tecadenoson, and cladribine by enzymatic transglycosylation. Catalysts 2019, 9, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhou, X.; Szeker, K.; Jiao, L.Y.; Oestreich, M.; Mikhailopulo, I.A.; Neubauer, P. Synthesis of 2,6-dihalogenated purine nucleosides by thermostable nucleoside phosphorylases. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Acosta, J.; Del Arco, J.; Martinez-Pascual, S.; Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Fernández-Lucas, J. One-pot multi-enzymatic production of purine derivatives with application in pharmaceutical and food industry. Catalysts 2018, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Pérez, E.; Sánchez-Murcia, P.A.; Jordaan, J.; Blanco, M.D.; Mancheño, J.M.; Gago, F.; Fernández-Lucas, J. Enzymatic synthesis of therapeutic nucleosides using a highly versatile purine nucleoside 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase from Trypanosoma brucei. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 4406–4416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rivero, C.W.; García, N.S.; Fernández-Lucas, J.; Betancor, L.; Romanelli, G.P.; Trelles, J. Green production of cladribine by using immobilized 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase from Lactobacillus delbrueckii stabilized through a double covalent/entrapment technology. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sheldon, R.A.; van Pelt, S. Enzyme immobilization in biocatalysis: Why, what and how. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6223–6235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mateo, C.; Palomo, J.M.; Fernandez-Lorente, G.; Guisan, J.M.; Fernández-Lafuente, R. Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 40, 1451–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Barbosa, O.; Torres, R.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Heterofunctional supports in enzyme immobilization: From traditional immobilization protocols to opportunities in tuning enzyme properties. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 2433–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Fresco-Taboada, A.; Fernández-Lucas, J.; Acebal, C.; Arroyo, M.; Ramón, F.; De la Mata, I.; Mancheño, J.M. 2′-Deoxyribosyltransferase from Bacillus psychrosaccharolyticus: A mesophilic-like biocatalyst for the synthesis of modified nucleosides from a psychrotolerant bacterium. Catalysts 2018, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Borlido, L.; Azevedo, A.M.; Roque, A.C.A.; Aires-Barros, M.R. Magnetic separations in biotechnology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 1374–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Del Arco, J.; Alcántara, A.R.; Fernández-Lafuente, R.; Fernández-Lucas, J. Magnetic micro-macro biocatalysts applied to industrial bioprocesses. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 322, 124547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Crespo, N.; Sánchez-Murcia, P.A.; Gago, F.; Cejudo-Sanches, J.; Galmes, M.A.; Fernández-Lucas, J.; Mancheño, J.M. 2′-Deoxyribosyltransferase from Leishmania mexicana, an efficient biocatalyst for one-pot, one-step synthesis of nucleosides from poorly soluble purine bases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 7187–7200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guddat, L.W.; Vos, S.; Martin, J.L.; Keough, D.T.; de Jersey, J. Crystal structures of free, IMP-, and GMP-bound Escherichia coli hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase. Prot. Sci. 2002, 11, 1626–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Keough, D.T.; Hocková, D.; Rejman, D.; Špaček, P.; Vrbková, S.; Krečmerová, M.; Eng, W.S.; Jans, H.; West, N.P.; Naesens, L.M.J.; et al. Inhibition of the Escherichia coli 6-oxopurine phosphoribosyltransferases by nucleoside phosphonates: Potential for new antibacterial agents. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 6967–6984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Acosta, J.; Nguyen, K.; Spitale, R.C.; Fernández-Lucas, J. Taylor-made production of pyrimidine nucleoside-5′-monophosphate analogues by highly stabilized mutant uracil phosphoribosyltransferase from Toxoplasma gondii. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 339, 125649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Del Arco, J.; Jordaan, J.; Moral-Dardé, V.; Fernández-Lucas, J. Sustainable production of nucleoside analogues by a high-efficient purine 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase immobilized onto Ni2+ chelate magnetic microparticles. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 289, 121772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fernández-Lucas, J.; Fresco-Taboada, A.; Acebal, C.; de la Mata, I.; Arroyo, M. Enzymatic synthesis of nucleoside analogues using immobilized 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase from Lactobacillus reuteri. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 91, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fernández-Lucas, J.; Fresco-Taboada, A.; de la Mata, I.; Arroyo, M. One-step enzymatic synthesis of nucleosides from low water-soluble purine bases in non-conventional media. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 115, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fernández-Lucas, J.; Harris, R.; Mata-Casar, I.; Heras, A.; de la Mata, I.; Arroyo, M. Magnetic chitosan beads for covalent immobilization of nucleoside 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase: Application in nucleoside analogues synthesis. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 40, 955–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fresco-Taboada, A.; Serra, I.; Fernández-Lucas, J.; Acebal, C.; Arroyo, M.; Terreni, M.; De la Mata, I. Nucleoside 2’-deoxyribosyltransferase from psychrophilic bacterium Bacillus psychrosaccharolyticus—Preparation of an immobilized biocatalyst for the enzymatic synthesis of therapeutic nucleosides. Molecules 2014, 19, 11231–11249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fresco-Taboada, A.; Serra, I.; Arroyo, M.; Fernández-Lucas, J.; de la Mata, I.; Terreni, M. Development of an immobilized biocatalyst based on Bacillus psychrosaccharolyticus NDT for the preparative synthesis of trifluridine and decytabine. Catal. Today 2016, 259, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Del Arco, J.; Martínez-Pascual, S.; Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Corral, O.J.; Jordaan, J.; Hormigo, D.; Perona, A.; Fernández-Lucas, J. One-pot, one-step production of dietary nucleotides by magnetic biocatalysts. Catalysts 2018, 8, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Rodrigues, R.C.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Torres, R.; Fernández-Lafuente, R. Modifying enzyme activity and selectivity by immobilization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6290–6307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Santos, J.C.S.; Barbosa, O.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Importance of the support properties for immobilization or purification of enzymes. Chem. Cat. Chem. 2015, 7, 2413–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Behrens, M.; Meyerhof, W.; Hellfritsch, C.; Hofmann, T. Sweet and umami taste: Natural products, their chemosensory targets, and beyond. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2220–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Acosta, J.; Pérez, E.; Sánchez-Murcia, P.A.; Fillat, C.; Fernández-Lucas, J. Molecular basis of NDT-mediated activation of nucleoside-based prodrugs and application in suicide gene therapy. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Enzymatic synthesis of Cladribine catalyzed by: (A) LmPDT. (B) LmPDT/EcHPRT. dIno: 2′-deoxyinosine; 2-ClAde: 2-chloroadenine; Hyp: hypoxanthine; PRPP: 5-phospho-α-D-ribosyl-1-pyrophosphate; LmPDT: Leishmania mexicana purine 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase; EcHPRT; Escherichia coli hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase.
Figure 1. Enzymatic synthesis of Cladribine catalyzed by: (A) LmPDT. (B) LmPDT/EcHPRT. dIno: 2′-deoxyinosine; 2-ClAde: 2-chloroadenine; Hyp: hypoxanthine; PRPP: 5-phospho-α-D-ribosyl-1-pyrophosphate; LmPDT: Leishmania mexicana purine 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase; EcHPRT; Escherichia coli hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase.
Ijms 23 13634 g001
Figure 2. Biochemical characterization of MLmPDT3 and MEcHPRT3. (A) Effect of temperature on MLmPDT3 activity (). (B) Effect of pH on MLmPDT3 activity, () 50 mM sodium citrate (pH 4–6), (△) 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6–8), (○) 50 mM MES (pH 6–7), (■) 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7–9), (□) 50 mM sodium borate (pH 8–10). (C) Effect of temperature MEcHPRT3 activity (). (D) Effect of pH on MEcHPRT3 activity, () 12 mM sodium citrate (pH 4–6), (△) 12 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6–8), (○) 12 mM MES (pH 6–7), (■) 12 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7–9), (□) 12 mM sodium borate (pH 8–10).
Figure 2. Biochemical characterization of MLmPDT3 and MEcHPRT3. (A) Effect of temperature on MLmPDT3 activity (). (B) Effect of pH on MLmPDT3 activity, () 50 mM sodium citrate (pH 4–6), (△) 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6–8), (○) 50 mM MES (pH 6–7), (■) 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7–9), (□) 50 mM sodium borate (pH 8–10). (C) Effect of temperature MEcHPRT3 activity (). (D) Effect of pH on MEcHPRT3 activity, () 12 mM sodium citrate (pH 4–6), (△) 12 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6–8), (○) 12 mM MES (pH 6–7), (■) 12 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7–9), (□) 12 mM sodium borate (pH 8–10).
Ijms 23 13634 g002
Figure 3. Biochemical characterization of the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system. (A) Effect of temperature on cladribine synthesis (●). (B) Effect of pH on cladribine synthesis, () 50 mM sodium citrate (pH 4–6), (△) 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6–8), (○) 50 mM MES (pH 6–7), (■) 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7–9), (□) 50 mM sodium borate (pH 8–10).
Figure 3. Biochemical characterization of the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system. (A) Effect of temperature on cladribine synthesis (●). (B) Effect of pH on cladribine synthesis, () 50 mM sodium citrate (pH 4–6), (△) 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6–8), (○) 50 mM MES (pH 6–7), (■) 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7–9), (□) 50 mM sodium borate (pH 8–10).
Ijms 23 13634 g003
Figure 4. Thermal inactivation profile of MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 on cladribine synthesis at 40 °C () and 50 °C (○).
Figure 4. Thermal inactivation profile of MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 on cladribine synthesis at 40 °C () and 50 °C (○).
Ijms 23 13634 g004
Figure 5. Effect of MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 ratio (μg of immobilized LmPDT/μg of immobilized EcHPRT) in the product formation. (A) cladribine (reaction 1). (B) Hyp converted into IMP (reaction 2).
Figure 5. Effect of MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 ratio (μg of immobilized LmPDT/μg of immobilized EcHPRT) in the product formation. (A) cladribine (reaction 1). (B) Hyp converted into IMP (reaction 2).
Ijms 23 13634 g005
Figure 6. Reusability of the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system. 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase activity, reaction 1 (black bar); phosphoribosyltransferase activity, reaction 2 (white bar).
Figure 6. Reusability of the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system. 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase activity, reaction 1 (black bar); phosphoribosyltransferase activity, reaction 2 (white bar).
Ijms 23 13634 g006
Table 1. Enzymatic synthesis of cladribine MLmPDT3 or MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT.
Table 1. Enzymatic synthesis of cladribine MLmPDT3 or MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT.
Reaction 1Reaction 2
SubstratesProductConversion
(%)
SubstratesProductConversion (%)
dIno
[mM]
2-ClAde
[mM]
Cladribine
[mM]
Hyp
[mM]
PRPP
[mM]
IMP
[mM]
MLmPDT3 a110.40 ± 0.0340----
MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 b110.52 ± 0.04520.5210.39 ± 0.0175
a Reaction conditions: 0.6 μg of immobilized LmPDT in 80 μL at 40 °C, 20 min and 300 r.p.m. [dIno] = [2-ClAde] = 1 mM, in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0. b Reaction conditions: 0.6 μg of immobilized LmPDT, 0.2 μg of immobilized EcHPRT in 80 μL at 40 °C, 20 min and 300 r.p.m. [dIno] = [2-ClAde] = [PRPP] =1 mM, [MgCl2] = 1.2 mM in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cruz, G.; Saiz, L.P.; Bilal, M.; Eltoukhy, L.; Loderer, C.; Fernández-Lucas, J. Magnetic Multi-Enzymatic System for Cladribine Manufacturing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113634

AMA Style

Cruz G, Saiz LP, Bilal M, Eltoukhy L, Loderer C, Fernández-Lucas J. Magnetic Multi-Enzymatic System for Cladribine Manufacturing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(21):13634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cruz, Guillermo, Laura Pilar Saiz, Muhammad Bilal, Lobna Eltoukhy, Christoph Loderer, and Jesús Fernández-Lucas. 2022. "Magnetic Multi-Enzymatic System for Cladribine Manufacturing" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 21: 13634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop