Political Hoplology: Religion, Warriors and the Preservation of Nations

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Humanities/Philosophies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 July 2023) | Viewed by 1811

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Political Science, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA
Interests: religion; political violence; warfare; martial arts; quantitative and computational methods

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Our relationship with violence can be best described as one of repulsion and fascination. To some extent, it is a necessary evil. Yet, we are generally socialized to be disgusted with it. The overwhelming need for cooperation, which is ultimately embedded in the social norms that allow complex societies to survive, trumps the necessity for the general population to be accustomed with violence. Moreover, most religious traditions consider it detrimental to civility. In fact, modern religious communities disregard, disincentivize, or even consider it as an immoral sin.

However, with the birth of Nations, violence is somehow deemed necessary to protect the state. But societies, understandably, wish to remove such necessary violence from sight and regulate it within clear, and morally acceptable, limits. Machiavelli and Weber, for example, reminded us that the legitimate leaders of society get to decide if violence is acceptable or not and under which circumstances it is welcomed. This concept is not new to political philosophy as we see in the development of the Just War Theory which tried to justify violence on religious grounds. Thus, since violence could be outlawed but not eliminated, it was isolated in specific activities ranging from combat sport competitions to the military. But violence being necessary to protect the state fosters a paradox: how do we generate such desire and control it?

An answer to this question is that at some point in history, warrior classes, later replaced by the military and martial artists, emerged precisely with the explicit goal of restraining violence and preventing men from falling into a condition of perpetual mortal combat prompted by the individual desire, in Morgenthau’s words their animus dominandi, of harvesting power over others. 

It is not surprising that these individuals are the ones who hold more onto religious beliefs and practices than others. Religious institutions and norms have emerged to address these silos and implement ways to harvest the full potential of violence while reducing and controlling its side effects and preventing social degradation.

The Special Issue aims to address this nexus and is broad in scope. We are inviting high-quality, original contributions from a wide array of disciplines, such as political science, sociology, psychology, martial arts studies, philosophy, and history. Contributions to this Special Issue might address, but are by no means limited to, the following points:

  • What is the political role of violence?
  • What role does religion play in promoting and containing violence via specialized warrior/military/martial artists classes?
  • With which concepts of political science can we meaningfully understand the relationship between specialized military classes and religion?

Dr. Andrea Molle
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religion
  • political violence
  • hoplology
  • martial arts

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 318 KiB  
Article
From Ahab to “Vilain Herodes”: Biblical Models of Evil Kings in Catholic Anti-Royalist Propaganda during Charles IX (1560–1574) and Henry III (1574–1589)
by Andrei Constantin Sălăvăstru
Religions 2023, 14(3), 344; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030344 - 6 Mar 2023
Viewed by 1327
Abstract
During the French Wars of Religion, both the Huguenot and the radical Catholic factions started by stressing their devotion to the Valois monarchy, for reasons both pragmatic and ideological. Both were hoping for the support of the Crown in achieving their goals—the Huguenots [...] Read more.
During the French Wars of Religion, both the Huguenot and the radical Catholic factions started by stressing their devotion to the Valois monarchy, for reasons both pragmatic and ideological. Both were hoping for the support of the Crown in achieving their goals—the Huguenots to convert France to the Reformation, the radical Catholics to eradicate the Protestantism from the kingdom—and their propaganda made use of numerous Biblical references in order to urge the kings of France to pursue such policy goals. However, Biblical precedents could be a two-edged sword: once hope for royal support was replaced by disappointment and even resentment, the nature of the Biblical models and comparisons changed as well. From appeals to emulate the righteous kings from the Bible, like David, Solomon or Josiah, the propagandists moved to warnings and even threats, by presenting the kings of France with the fate of, this time, wicked rulers like Ahab or Herod, who were grievously punished by God for their transgressions. This paper aims to analyze the recurrences of such examples in the Catholic propaganda during the French Wars of Religion, until the death of Henry III in 1589, and their significance in the political discourse of that age. Full article
Back to TopTop