Religion–Existence–Death: Perspectives from Existentialism

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 October 2023) | Viewed by 7000

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA
Interests: existentialism; ancient Greek philosophy; philosophy of religion; Heidegger; Martin Buber

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy and Humanities, College of Continuing Education, Southern New Hampshire University, Manchester, NH 03824, USA
Interests: ecofeminism; ancient Greek philosophy; Heidegger

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Religions invites authors to explore experiences and conceptions of death from the religious/philosophical viewpoints of existentialism. The reality of death continues to challenge and compel humanity toward an adequate response to this mystery of life through life reflected in language, culture, religion and politics with insights that revise, reconfirm or reject traditional perspectives. Contributions to the question of religion and death seen from the existentialist perspective(s) are welcome from all arrays of academic and professional life concerned with the existential phenomenon of death, such as theology, philosophy, linguistics, anthropology, history, sociology, political science, and the natural sciences.

While religion is a response to the reality of mortality, secular societies have relegated the phenomenon to the personal domain of private life, where it only finds social recognition in its commodification and, on special occasions, elevation to a public event. The universal fear of its omnipresence places death as an event in the center of existence, where its looming threat is “best” coped with in deliberate ignorance and determined indifference. In his existential ontology, Martin Heidegger addresses this phenomenon within his conception of (in)authentic being. However, the rich complexity of the issue has since been met with overcomplicated analyses that aim, but fail, to capture the simplicity of the existential truth. The pandemic reveals the perennial timeliness of the question in its enduring timelessness, manifested in the (im)pertinence of its relentless self-assertion. Thus, the question of death deserves revisitation from a plethora of academic disciplines.

This Special Issue will provide a space for renewed investigation. Its goal is to recreate a university forum for the exploration of ideas in the original sense, now seldom seen because of the continuing fractionalization of thought into ever new subdisciplines. The vibrant breadth of focus on this vital question will help restore the original vision of the university as an agora and center of the polis of the human enterprise of understanding—the understanding of the religious experience of life and death. As a place of collegial collaboration, the university is naturally inclined to conduct constructive dialogue and assemble the multifaceted perspectives of its disciplines into one holistic view. The Special Issue will reflect this mission and provide both the depth and the breadth of a panoramic vision on the vital questions of both religion faced with the reality of death and death seen within the context of religion, including the rejection of it.

As both religion and death constitute pillars of human existence, the open-minded dialogue at and around these pillars will widen the horizon of humanity, and, through a concentrated and concerted effort, encourage the self-extension of human being(s) toward the recognition and embrace of its (and each other’s) intrinsic otherness. In the unity of its vast differences, humanity sees itself called to celebrate the wealth of its flourishing existence. Religious, cultural, and individual realities give testimony to the human endevour of coping with the reality of mortality. Hence, all professions and disciplines are called to speak to the question of religion and death from an existentialist perspective.

Dr. Achim Oberst
Dr. Susanne Claxton
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • A/temporality/eternity
  • Anxiety/despair/dread/fear
  • Body
  • Death/dying/perishing
  • Finitude
  • Im/mortality
  • Nothing(ness)
  • Im/perfection
  • Redemption/salvation/bliss
  • Resurrection/survival

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 190 KiB  
Article
Plato, C.S. Lewis, and J.R.R. Tolkien Using Literary and Philosophical Texts to Navigate Post-Pandemic and Political Teaching Challenges
by Anne-Marie Schultz and C. D. Maples
Religions 2024, 15(3), 257; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030257 - 21 Feb 2024
Viewed by 656
Abstract
We examine how Plato, C.S. Lewis, and J.R.R Tolkien responded to tumultuous times that included the ongoing reality of death through wars and plagues and social unrest. More specifically, we draw upon the historical backdrop of Plato’s dialogues, C.S. Lewis’s essay, “Learning in [...] Read more.
We examine how Plato, C.S. Lewis, and J.R.R Tolkien responded to tumultuous times that included the ongoing reality of death through wars and plagues and social unrest. More specifically, we draw upon the historical backdrop of Plato’s dialogues, C.S. Lewis’s essay, “Learning in War-time”, and Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings to bring to light important social and psychological dimensions of the learning process that may help students and educators navigate these tumultuous times that cause confrontation with death. We argue for a middle ground between emphasizing the “unprecedented” nature of events like COVID-19, the politically divisive state of affairs in America, the war in Ukraine, the devastation of earthquakes in Syria and Turkey, and the desire to find a new normal in the midst of world-wide turmoil. We first reflect on our experiences with pandemic teaching and learning. Then, we address some contemporary research on pandemic learning. Third, we turn to the historical backdrop of Plato’s dialogues, specifically the Plague, The Peloponnesian War, the rule of “The Thirty”, the restoration of democracy, and the Reconciliation Agreement in Athens. Fourth, we consider some of the effects of the first and second world wars for both C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien. Finally, we suggest that Gandalf emerges as a model of the middle ground we aim for in our pedagogical relationships. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion–Existence–Death: Perspectives from Existentialism)
13 pages, 274 KiB  
Article
Spinoza’s Antidote to Death
by José María Sánchez de León Serrano
Religions 2024, 15(1), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010094 - 11 Jan 2024
Viewed by 692
Abstract
The paper delves into Spinoza’s perspective on death and how the acquisition of genuine knowledge ensures the mind’s survival after the body’s demise. Spinoza is well known for characterizing the human mind as the idea of the body, which therefore reflects all of [...] Read more.
The paper delves into Spinoza’s perspective on death and how the acquisition of genuine knowledge ensures the mind’s survival after the body’s demise. Spinoza is well known for characterizing the human mind as the idea of the body, which therefore reflects all of the body’s states and is fundamentally connected to its physical destiny, encompassing growth and development as well as eventual extinction. However, Spinoza also holds that the mind possesses the capacity to transcend its limited perspective and contemplate things from the vantage point of God, freeing itself from its mortal fate. The paper’s goal is to dissect the intricacies of this cognitive liberation and evaluate its logical soundness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion–Existence–Death: Perspectives from Existentialism)
11 pages, 249 KiB  
Article
Embracing Life: Gustav Landauer’s Anarchism as Rejection of Death
by Libera Pisano
Religions 2024, 15(1), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010047 - 27 Dec 2023
Viewed by 912
Abstract
This paper examines Gustav Landauer’s mystical anarchism, focusing on the concept of overcoming death as a core element of his thought. It explores Landauer’s rejection of death as both a linguistic superstition and a limited worldview, emphasizing the collective whole over individualism. The [...] Read more.
This paper examines Gustav Landauer’s mystical anarchism, focusing on the concept of overcoming death as a core element of his thought. It explores Landauer’s rejection of death as both a linguistic superstition and a limited worldview, emphasizing the collective whole over individualism. The essay suggests that Landauer’s representation of revolution moving from space to time includes his account of mystical anarchy, which fosters a deep connection with the past and a sense of unity with the world and humanity. This shift in perspective promotes a more fulfilling and meaningful existence within a larger, authentic community that is an antidote to the constraints of death. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion–Existence–Death: Perspectives from Existentialism)
26 pages, 339 KiB  
Article
Spectacles of Disgrace: Nietzsche, Coetzee, and Life after the Death of God
by Daniel Conway
Religions 2022, 13(10), 929; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100929 - 05 Oct 2022
Viewed by 1570
Abstract
My aim in this essay is to explore the complementarities that obtain between Nietzsche’s account (or teaching) of the “death of God” and J. M. Coetzee’s characterization of David Lurie in his 1999 novel Disgrace. I am particularly concerned to investigate the [...] Read more.
My aim in this essay is to explore the complementarities that obtain between Nietzsche’s account (or teaching) of the “death of God” and J. M. Coetzee’s characterization of David Lurie in his 1999 novel Disgrace. I am particularly concerned to investigate the responses of Nietzsche’s Madman and Coetzee’s protagonist to their respective insights into (or experiences of) the “death of God.” Both respondents, I offer, may be seen and understood to create public spectacles in which they acquire (what they take to be) permanent, meaning-conferring identities that are meant, if not destined, to withstand the dislocations and calamities to come. In both cases, moreover, the point of the spectacle is to secure the conditions under which its architect may escape any responsibility for navigating the uncertainties that are bound to arise in the aftermath of the “death of God.” Whereas Nietzsche is primarily concerned to anticipate (and diagnose) the distress that leads to the creation of responsibility-deferring spectacles, Coetzee provides an instructive treatment of life after the death of God, as David Lurie is compelled to confront the emerging post-theistic order he had hoped to avoid. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion–Existence–Death: Perspectives from Existentialism)
9 pages, 221 KiB  
Article
In the Shadow of Death: Jewish Affirmations of Life
by Paul Mendes-Flohr
Religions 2022, 13(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13010026 - 28 Dec 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1965
Abstract
The Book of Genesis reports that “On the sixth day of Creation “God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good” (1:31). The very, so a Talmudic sage taught refers to “death”. We are to share God’s exultant affirmation [...] Read more.
The Book of Genesis reports that “On the sixth day of Creation “God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good” (1:31). The very, so a Talmudic sage taught refers to “death”. We are to share God’s exultant affirmation of His work of creation as culminating in death. For death is intrinsic to the blessings of life. As Buber notes in the epigraph cited above, life is “unspeakably beautiful because death looks over our shoulder”. The seeming paradox—an existential antinomy—inflected the vernacular Yiddish of my late father which was also that of Buber’s youth “the one thing needful” (Luke 10:42); “love is strong as death” (Song of Songs; 8:6). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion–Existence–Death: Perspectives from Existentialism)
Back to TopTop