What is the Future for Natural Theology?

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Theologies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 July 2021) | Viewed by 2335

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Religions, Philosophies, and Ethics, Bath Spa University, Bath BA1 3EL, UK
Interests: philosophy of religion; natural theology; atheism

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In its most general formulation, natural theology refers to the use of natural cognitive faculties to enquire into theological questions, most centrally questions of the existence and nature of God. Commonly, natural theology rejects the use of any ‘non-natural’ means of enquiry, both non-natural faculties (such as inspiration and mystical experience) and reliance on super-natural sources (such as revelation, religious traditions, and convention). Whilst likely ancient and universal, it is widely held that the legitimacy of such an enterprise has been seriously undermined in modernity through a combination of powerful philosophical, scientific, and theological objections, such that any serious attempt to chart a future for natural theology must start from a revisionary position and set out a new vision for natural theology.

This special issue seeks to solicit responses to one single question: ‘What is the future for natural theology?’

The collection seeks to bring together a variety of voices on the future of natural theology (or lack thereof), as well as critical accounts of the dominant narrative of natural theology’s rise and fall. Subsidiary questions include: What sort of new visions are available for natural theology and how might the project be revised or reformulated for the future? What new resources—philosophical, scientific, and theological—might be available to re-imagine or reframe natural theological work? Are there neglected traditions within the wider genre of natural theological works that might equip a contemporary ressourcement, or new forms of natural theology that engage perspectives that have not traditionally been prominent? Do cultural and aesthetic contexts provide promising alternative forms for natural theology? What are the prospects for natural theology beyond the dominant framework of Christianity and Western philosophy? How accurate are our accepted histories of natural theology’s apparent decline? How robust are the philosophical arguments against the legitimacy of natural theology, or are there effective counter-arguments that can defend a philosophically viable natural theology? How persuasive are the scientific rejections of natural theology, or do the sciences (social as well as natural) provide support for natural theology? Are the theological objections to natural theology warranted, or are there compelling theological and religious rationales for continuing and extending the enterprise?


Dr. Russell Re Manning
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • natural theology
  • philosophy of religion
  • theism
  • atheism
  • theistic arguments

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 246 KiB  
Article
Ecology as a New Foundation for Natural Theology
by Andreas Gonçalves Lind and Bruno Nobre
Religions 2021, 12(8), 660; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12080660 - 19 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1736
Abstract
The erosion of metaphysics that began in Modernity has led to the discredit of the whole project of natural theology as a means to reach God, establish the classical divine attributes, and account for divine action. After the deconstruction of classical metaphysics propelled [...] Read more.
The erosion of metaphysics that began in Modernity has led to the discredit of the whole project of natural theology as a means to reach God, establish the classical divine attributes, and account for divine action. After the deconstruction of classical metaphysics propelled by thinkers associated with the Protestant tradition and by philosophers affiliated with the Nietzschean critique, it may appear that only an apophatic approach to God would then be possible. However, the attempt to establish a consensual foundation for the theological discourse has not lost its relevance. In this sense, the attempts to revitalize natural theology are most welcome. It would be naive, however, to think that approaches to natural theology based on classical metaphysics will easily gather consensus. This will not happen. The departing point for a renewed and credible approach to natural theology cannot be the theoretical universal reason associated with Modernity, which is no longer acknowledged as a common ground. As such, a viable approach to natural theology has to find a new consensual starting point. The goal of this article is to argue that the emergence of a new ecological urgency and sensibility, which nowadays gather a high degree of consensus, offers an opportunity for the renewal of natural theology. It is our aim: (i) to show the extent to which God grounds the intrinsic value of nature, which, as such, deserves respect, and (ii) to suggest that the reverence for nature may naturally lead contemporary human beings to God. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue What is the Future for Natural Theology?)
Back to TopTop