C. S. Lewis and Film

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2024 | Viewed by 1222

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy, Redeemer University, Ancaster, ON L9K 1J4, Canada
Interests: C. S. Lewis; philosophy in film; ethics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

C. S. Lewis is one of the most important theologians and literary theorists of the last century (Flew, 4). His literary theories, found in such works as An Experiment in Criticism and The Personal Heresy, and theological insights have been used to read countless books (Schakel, 18), and their potential for interpreting and illuminating film is high. Moreover, Lewis’ life and novels (e.g., Narnia) have themselves become sources of high-budget films starting major Hollywood actors. For this Special Issue, we are seeking articles that use Lewis’ literary or theological insights to unpack films or to explore films of his own life (e.g., Shadowlands) or novels (e.g., The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe).

LITERARY THEORY

Lewis’ literary theory, though it lacks a formal name, asks audiences to “get themselves out of the way” to let the screenwriter and director speak for themselves. This method of “reading” a film is often perceived as naïve these days, but is it really? (Glover, 47)

THEOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY IN FILM

How might Lewis’ metaphysical, epistemological, ethical and social vision be illuminated in, or help us to illuminate, films? How might Lewis’ philosophy or theology help us to critique, or appreciate more deeply, various films? (White, 75)

FILMS ON LEWIS OR LEWIS’ WORK

Biographical films are often the subject of critique from scholars for their faithfulness, or lack thereof, to historical fact. Shadowlands is no exception here. Is a good movie? Additionally, does its goodness require faithfulness to the man’s life? (Barkman, 325) In addition, Lewis never imagined his own novels as films; are the various versions of the Narnian films faithful to Lewis’s vision? Does it matter?

References

Barkman, Adam. C. S. Lewis & Philosophy as a Way of Life. New York: Zossima, 2008.

Flew, Anthony. There Is a God: How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind. New York: HarperOne, 2007.

Glover, Donald. C. S. Lewis: The Art of Enchantment. Athens: University of Ohio Press, 1981.

Schakel, Peter. Imagination and the Arts in C. S. Lewis. Missouri: University of Missouri Press, 2002.

White, William Luther. The Image of Man in C. S. Lewis. Nashville: Abingdon, 1969.

Prof. Dr. Adam Barkman
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • C. S. Lewis
  • film
  • personal heresy, an experiment in criticism
  • chronicles of Narnia
  • theology
  • Christian literary theory
  • Shadowlands
  • Disney

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

9 pages, 194 KiB  
Article
Christopher Nolan’s Joker as a Consistent Naturalist (And That’s Still a Bad Thing)
by Adam Barkman and Aaron Korvemaker
Religions 2023, 14(12), 1535; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14121535 - 13 Dec 2023
Viewed by 781
Abstract
In this article, we discuss C. S. Lewis’s description, and critique, of metaphysical naturalism, and apply this to our reading of the Joker in Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight. We argue that Nolan’s Joker is the most ethically consistent type of naturalist, [...] Read more.
In this article, we discuss C. S. Lewis’s description, and critique, of metaphysical naturalism, and apply this to our reading of the Joker in Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight. We argue that Nolan’s Joker is the most ethically consistent type of naturalist, and that this makes his ethical position at once more praiseworthy than that of numerous naturalistic moral thinkers, such as Sam Harris, insofar as it is consistent, and yet blameworthy in that other naturalistic ethicists, inconsistent though they may be, at least, reasonably, assume a kind of objective morality via implicit supernaturalist assumptions about “right” and “wrong”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue C. S. Lewis and Film)
Back to TopTop