The Creative Death of God

A special issue of Philosophies (ISSN 2409-9287).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2024) | Viewed by 474

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA 90747, USA
Interests: modern religious thought; modern philosophy and theology; political theology; history of ideas

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The “death of God” motif blazes a transformative path through the modern history of ideas in radically differential keys—from Spinoza to Schelling and Hegel, Stirner and Mainländer, Bakunin and Nietzsche, Freud, Heidegger, and Whitehead, to cite only a few brightly burning lights. New domains of thought were wrested into play as normative apprehensions of God’s essential nature were transformed, eclipsed, or displaced. The “death” metaphor applied to the monotheistic deity of Western traditions has surfaced in diverse, polyvalent, radical, often elusive registers, as has been delineated by critical observers such as Löwith, Blumenberg, J. Taubes and S. Taubes, Derrida, Baudrillard, Gauchet, and scores of others.

New values and jolting implications were consequential to the waves of serial godlessnesses: Luther’s abyssal hidden God, Spinoza’s purported “atheism,” Hegel’s unhappy consciousness, Stirner’s ecstatic egotism, Simone Weil’s absent God, and so on. Albert Camus remarked, “the history of metaphysical rebellion cannot be confused with that of atheism” (in J. Kripal, Superhumanisms, U. of Chicago Press, 2022, 76). Neither, certainly, can the “death of God” metaphor be confused with atheism, though all too often it has been.

Scholarly treatments tend to accent the negative valence of this “death,” emphasizing what is lost or rendered past rather than appreciating the novel potentialities—the ultimate adventure in ideas—opened up by epochal transformations of “God.” To achieve a more serious and sympathetic take, the
intent of this Special Issue is to plumb the creativity of the death of God motif as an “edge” driving modern thought that merits in-depth historical-critical assessment.

The proposal is to lay out as probingly as possible how the “death of God” has functioned as a creative catalyst for thought historically. Novel lines of thinking gained potency as traditional understandings of God ceded to innovative new atheisms, last gods, new gods, new idols, ideals, and superhumanities. Is modernity truly “post-theistic” or has it simply reinvented and reconstituted deity in sundry camouflaged and disseminated forms? Is the death of God a farewell or is it ironically a dimension of the persistent life of God, still claiming an apocalyptic and prophetic voice?

This Special Issue seeks probing historical-philosophical reflections on the constructive valence of the death of God, contextualized within a long-term historical-hermeneutic backdrop. Each contributor is invited to think freely, to work out an essay from the distinctive historical expertise she or he has
developed through a career-long trajectory. The desideratum is that a more creative heuristic will emerge from this journal Issue as a whole (as the 1975 Special Issue Daedalus 104.2, for example, spurred fuller cognizance of the “Axial revolution”). Constructive historical thinking has not, to date,
achieved this sort of hermeneutic probity and synoptic crystallization with respect to the death of God. It is a humanistic task inherently worthy of aspiration.

Dr. Lissa McCullough
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Philosophies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • death of God
  • godlessness
  • post-theism
  • atheism
  • nihilism
  • modern theology
  • Stirner
  • Mainländer
  • Nietzsche
  • Heidegger

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 245 KiB  
Article
The Death of God as Source of the Creativity of Humans
by Franke William
Philosophies 2024, 9(3), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9030055 - 25 Apr 2024
Viewed by 168
Abstract
Although declarations of the death of God seem to be provocations announcing the end of the era of theology, this announcement is actually central to the Christian revelation in its most classic forms, as well as to its reworkings in contemporary religious thought. [...] Read more.
Although declarations of the death of God seem to be provocations announcing the end of the era of theology, this announcement is actually central to the Christian revelation in its most classic forms, as well as to its reworkings in contemporary religious thought. Indeed provocative new possibilities for thinking theologically open up precisely in the wake of the death of God. Already Hegel envisaged a revolutionary new realization of divinity emerging in and with the secular world through its establishment of a total order of immanence. However, in postmodern times this comprehensive order aspired to by modern secularism implodes or cracks open towards the wholly Other. A hitherto repressed demand for the absolute difference of the religious, or for “transcendence”, returns with a vengeance. Th is difference is what could not be stated in terms of the Hegelian System, for reasons that poststructuralist writers particularly have insisted on: all representations of God are indeed dead. Yet this does not mean that they cannot still be powerful, but only that they cannot assign God any stable identity. Nietzsche’s sense of foreboding concerning the death of God is coupled with his intimations of the demise of representation and “grammar” as epistemologically bankrupt, but also with his vision of a positive potential for creating value in the wake of this collapse of all linguistically articulated culture. He points the way towards the emergence of a post-secular religious thinking of what exceeds thought and representation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Creative Death of God)
Back to TopTop