Ethics and Family History: Challenges, Dilemmas and Responsibilities

A special issue of Genealogy (ISSN 2313-5778). This special issue belongs to the section "Family History".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 February 2024) | Viewed by 2331

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Independent Scholar, Greater Manchester, UK
Interests: family history; digital family history; Irish family history; children and family social work; social work professional education

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue of Genealogy invites contributions on the topic of ethics and family history: challenges, dilemmas and responsibilities.

Family history is a popular leisure pastime, with millions of people using pay-to-view and sometimes free online tools and resources to research their family stories. Over the last ten years or so, genetic genealogy—DNA sequencing and matching services—has provided powerful new tools to researchers. In collecting data from millions of people, DNA testing services and comparison websites offer, as Julie Creet puts it, “infinitely expanding relatives and infinitely receding origins” (de Groot, 2019).

This has provided new opportunities for researchers to extend the range of their research, and to find connections with more distant living and dead relatives. In the process, we may discover personal secrets about individual family members, or uncomfortable truths about our family history requiring us to make decisions about whether and how to share this information (Smart, 2009). This is difficult for any family historian, but perhaps more so for ‘non-professionals’ working without the experience of research codes of practice and formal ethical guidelines.

Commercially run family-tree websites and DNA comparison websites contain billions of records worldwide, and inevitably encounter conflicting objectives, including making money and managing privacy and data protection concerns, as well as providing accurate scientific and historical content. In changing social, political and scientific contexts - for example, developments in forensic genetic genealogy, and the testing of samples of deceased relatives (McKibbin, Shabani and Larmuseau, 2023) - there are likely to be new challenges, and it is timely to consider how these conflicts may be managed ethically, and what principles should be applied.

This Special Issue aims to bring together a collection of work on current and developing ethical issues in the field of family history, and their implications for professional and non-professional practitioners, members of the public, commercial organisations, and institutions, policy makers and legislators. Contributions are invited from any relevant discipline (including humanities, law, genetics, health and social care, sociology) and from practitioners and professional genealogists.

Topics relevant for this Special Issue include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • How family historians perceive and manage ethical concerns in practice.
  • Telling difficult stories ethically.
  • The ethical relationship between family history research and current/historical issues of social justice.
  • Genetic genealogy and the interests and rights of indigenous people.
  • Ethical responsibilities to the dead.
  • The implications of the commercialisation and commodification of family history research.
  • Consumer DNA testing and the rise of forensic genetic genealogy.
  • Codes of practice and ethical guidelines.

The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication will be waived for papers accepted for this special edition.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the guest editor (drhelenscholar@gmail.com) or to the Genealogy editorial office (genealogy@mdpi.com). Abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editor for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review. Potential authors may contact the guest editor by email for informal discussion if required.

References

de Groot, J. “The Genealogical sublime”: An Interview with Julie Creet. Int. Public Hist. 2019, 2. https://doi.org/10.1515/iph-2019-0017.

McKibbin, K.; Shabani, M.; Larmuseau, M.H.D. From collected stamps to hair locks: ethical and legal implications of testing DNA found on privately owned family artifacts. Hum. Genet. 2023, 142, 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-022-02508-y.

Smart, C. Family Secrets: Law and Understandings of Openness in Everyday Relationships. J. Soc. Policy 2009, 38, 551–67.

Dr. Helen Scholar
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Genealogy is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ethics and family history
  • ethics and genetic genealogy
  • family secrets
  • data privacy
  • ethical responsibilities to the living and dead

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 266 KiB  
Article
“The Past Is Never Dead. It’s Not Even Past” (Faulkner, 1919 Requiem for a Nun p. 85): Mapping and Taking Care of the Ghosts in Adoption
by Gary Clapton
Genealogy 2024, 8(2), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy8020037 - 01 Apr 2024
Viewed by 675
Abstract
The Code of Ethics of the Association of Professional Genealogists promotes the communication of coherent, clear, and well-organised information). It is not that simple when adoption features in a family’s history. This paper suggests that standard approaches to family tree-construction will struggle to [...] Read more.
The Code of Ethics of the Association of Professional Genealogists promotes the communication of coherent, clear, and well-organised information). It is not that simple when adoption features in a family’s history. This paper suggests that standard approaches to family tree-construction will struggle to capture the complexities, gaps, and challenges posed by adoption. Firstly, the paper makes the case for family historians having an alertness to adoption by noting the number of people affected by adoption. It then goes on to look at the literature that argues that adoption involves erasures of birth families and makes ghosts of them. Adoption also creates possible selves and lives; the adopted person’s “could-have-beens” had there been no adoption, the biological child that the adoptive parents might have had and could not, the birth mother’s life with the child lost to adoption. These presences and possibilities haunt all involved in adoption, and writers have posited the existence of a “ghost kingdom”. This paper maps out a greater ghost world of adoption, paradoxically full of life, and because of access to birth records, a world that offers a much greater potential for materialisation. The paper avoids the traditional notions of ghosts as things to be shunned or as representatives of pathologies. Instead, it asks for respect for the “not-dead”/“not-past” of adoption and for family history researchers, a capacity to embrace the jumbled, the murky, and the disorganised. People everywhere are increasingly constructing their own family trees, with all the potential for pleasant surprise but also the shock that this might bring. Should genealogists overlook adoption’s ghosts then they overlook the opportunity to professionally map a rich and varied world of family knowledge and connections. The paper concludes with this observation coupled with a discussion of other associated ethical implications of family history work where adoption features. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ethics and Family History: Challenges, Dilemmas and Responsibilities)
Back to TopTop