Abdominal Ultrasound and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A special issue of Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Imaging and Theranostics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2021) | Viewed by 20051

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Urafune-cho 4-57, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan
Interests: gastroenterology; contrast-enhanced US for the diagnosis of hepatic, gallbladder, and pancreatic lesions; diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
Interests: hepatocellular carcinoma; portal hypertension; ultrasound

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Liver cancer is the 6th most common cancer in terms of incidence and has the 4th highest cancer-related mortality around the world. Ninety percent of liver cancer is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In general, an abdominal ultrasound (US) is the initial screening modality for the detection of HCC. Fusion imaging combining US and CT or MRI is useful for the detection of HCC, guidance of tumor biopsy and ablation therapy, and monitoring during the ablation. Contrast-enhanced US is useful for evaluating therapeutic efficacy of HCC treatment such as radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, stereotactic body radiotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization, and systemic chemotherapy.

This Special Issue invites the submission of both original and review papers, clinical and technical papers regarding abdominal US imaging for the diagnosis and treatment of HCCs.

Dr. Kazushi Numata
Dr. Hitoshi Maruyama
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diagnostics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • ultrasound
  • color Doppler
  • contrast-enhanced ultrasound
  • fusion imaging
  • 3D ultrasound
  • ultrasonography
  • interventional
  • radiofrequency ablation
  • microwave ablation
  • high-intensity focused ultrasound
  • stereotactic body radiotherapy
  • transarterial chemoembolization
  • systemic chemotherapy

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review, Other

4 pages, 194 KiB  
Editorial
Abdominal Ultrasound and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
by Kazushi Numata
Diagnostics 2021, 11(7), 1268; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071268 - 15 Jul 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1756
Abstract
Liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer death, based on Global Cancer Statistics 2020 [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abdominal Ultrasound and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review, Other

17 pages, 4143 KiB  
Article
Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with Sonazoid for Evaluating the Radiotherapy Efficacy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
by Akihiro Funaoka, Kazushi Numata, Atsuya Takeda, Yusuke Saigusa, Yuichirou Tsurugai, Hiromi Nihonmatsu, Makoto Chuma, Hiroyuki Fukuda, Masahiro Okada, Masayuki Nakano and Shin Maeda
Diagnostics 2021, 11(3), 486; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030486 - 09 Mar 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2442
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the available curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We investigate the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using Sonazoid (SCEUS) in evaluating the efficacy of radiotherapy for HCC. We enrolled 59 patients with 59 HCCs in this retrospective study. Tumor size [...] Read more.
Radiotherapy is one of the available curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We investigate the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using Sonazoid (SCEUS) in evaluating the efficacy of radiotherapy for HCC. We enrolled 59 patients with 59 HCCs in this retrospective study. Tumor size and tumor vascularity were evaluated using SCEUS before and 1, 3, 7, 10, and 13 months after radiotherapy. The median follow-up period was 44.5 months (range: 16–82 months). Of the HCCs, 95% (56/59) had no local recurrence, while 5% (3/59) did. At 13 months after radiotherapy, in cases with no local recurrence, SCEUS showed a reduction in tumor vascularity in all cases, while tumor size reduction (>30% reduction, compared with pre-radiotherapy) was observed in 82.1% (46/56). In all three cases of local recurrence, vascularity and tumor size reduction were not observed during the follow-up period and residual HCCs were demonstrated pathologically. Compared with cases with local recurrence, tumor size reduction and reduction in tumor vascularity (p < 0.001) were significantly greater in cases with no local recurrence at 13 months after radiotherapy. SCEUS may be useful in evaluating radiotherapy efficacy for HCC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abdominal Ultrasound and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2352 KiB  
Article
Predicting Therapeutic Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization with Drug-Eluting Beads for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
by Kazue Shiozawa, Takashi Matsui, Takahiro Murakami, Manabu Watanabe and Iruru Maetani
Diagnostics 2021, 11(2), 291; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020291 - 12 Feb 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1517
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for predicting the therapeutic efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Thirty-two patients with HCC who underwent DEB-TACE were enrolled in this study. Enhancement [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for predicting the therapeutic efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Thirty-two patients with HCC who underwent DEB-TACE were enrolled in this study. Enhancement patterns of vascular phase images on CEUS were compared before and within 3 days after DEB-TACE, and the patterns after DEB-TACE were classified as follows: Pattern A, no enhancement; Pattern B, peripheral ring enhancement; Pattern C, partial enhancement within or peripheral to tumors, and Pattern D, reduced or unchanged enhancement in the whole tumor. Enhancement patterns in all lesions and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) findings after DEB-TACE were compared statistically. The treatment response of DEB-TACE was evaluated using the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) by CECT. The enhancement patterns on CEUS performed within 3 days after DEB-TACE were defined as Pattern A in 17 cases, B in 7, C in 13, and D in 2. The complete response rates at one month after treatment were 94.1% (16/17 lesions) for Pattern A, 85.7% (6/7) for B, 15.4% (2/13) for C, and 50% (1/2) for D. The response rates were significantly higher for lesions with Pattern A compared to those with Pattern C at one month (p = 0.009) and 12 months (p < 0.001) after treatment, and significantly higher for lesions with Pattern B compared to those with Pattern C at 12 months after treatment (p = 0.031). Comparisons between other patterns showed no significant differences. CEUS immediately after DEB-TACE may allow early assessment of therapeutic efficacy, with findings of no enhancement or peripheral ring enhancement suggesting a positive outcome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abdominal Ultrasound and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 6378 KiB  
Article
Diagnostic Value of CEUS Prompting Liver Biopsy: Histopathological Correlation of Hepatic Lesions with Ambiguous Imaging Characteristics
by Thomas Geyer, Dirk-André Clevert, Sonja Schwarz, Paul Reidler, Sebastian Gassenmaier, Thomas Knösel, Johannes Rübenthaler, Vincent Schwarze and Marco Armbruster
Diagnostics 2021, 11(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010035 - 27 Dec 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2509
Abstract
Background: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows for dynamic analysis of vascularization patterns of unclear hepatic lesions. Our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS for further characterizing suspicious liver lesions by comparing findings from CEUS examinations with corresponding histopathology. Methods: Between 2005 [...] Read more.
Background: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows for dynamic analysis of vascularization patterns of unclear hepatic lesions. Our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS for further characterizing suspicious liver lesions by comparing findings from CEUS examinations with corresponding histopathology. Methods: Between 2005 and 2016, 160 patients with unclear liver lesions underwent CEUS followed by liver biopsy. All examinations were performed by an experienced consultant radiologist (EFSUMB Level 3) and included native B-mode ultrasound, Color Doppler, and CEUS. A second-generation blood pool contrast agent was applied for CEUS. Results: CEUS was successfully performed in all patients without occurrence of any adverse side effects. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 94.5%, a specificity of 70.6%, a true positive rate of 87.3%, and a true negative rate of 85.7% compared to histopathological results as the reference standard. Conclusions: CEUS represents a safe imaging modality with a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing both—benign and malignant—liver lesions compared to corresponding histopathological results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abdominal Ultrasound and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3719 KiB  
Article
Usefulness of Modified CEUS LI-RADS for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Sonazoid
by Katsutoshi Sugimoto, Tatsuya Kakegawa, Hiroshi Takahashi, Yusuke Tomita, Masakazu Abe, Yu Yoshimasu, Hirohito Takeuchi, Yoshitaka Kasai and Takao Itoi
Diagnostics 2020, 10(10), 828; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10100828 - 15 Oct 2020
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 2555
Abstract
The Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) was introduced for classifying suspected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it cannot be applied to Sonazoid. We assessed the diagnostic usefulness of a modified CEUS LI-RADS for HCC and non-HCC malignancies based on [...] Read more.
The Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) was introduced for classifying suspected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it cannot be applied to Sonazoid. We assessed the diagnostic usefulness of a modified CEUS LI-RADS for HCC and non-HCC malignancies based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Patients with chronic liver disease at risk for HCC were evaluated retrospectively. Nodules ≥1 cm with arterial phase hyperenhancement, no early washout (within 60 s), and contrast defects in the Kupffer phase were classified as LR-5. Nodules showing early washout, contrast defects in the Kupffer phase, and/or rim enhancement were classified as LR-M. A total of 104 nodules in 104 patients (median age: 70.0 years; interquartile range: 54.5–78.0 years; 74 men) were evaluated. The 48 (46.2%) LR-5 lesions included 45 HCCs, 2 high-flow hemangiomas, and 1 adrenal rest tumor. The PPV of LR-5 for HCC was 93.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 82.8–98.7%). The 22 (21.2%) LR-M lesions included 16 non-HCC malignancies and 6 HCCs. The PPV of LR-M for non-HCC malignancies, including six intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, was 100% (95% CI: 69.8–100%). In conclusion, in the modified CEUS LI-RADS for Sonazoid, LR-5 and LR-M are good predictors of HCC and non-HCC malignancies, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abdominal Ultrasound and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research, Other

15 pages, 1864 KiB  
Review
Clinical Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for Characterizing Liver Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
by Lingling Li, Yixin Hu, Jing Han, Qing Li, Chuan Peng and Jianhua Zhou
Diagnostics 2021, 11(2), 323; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020323 - 17 Feb 2021
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 2350
Abstract
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing liver imaging in patients at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category 5 (LR5) for diagnosing HCC and LI-RADS category [...] Read more.
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing liver imaging in patients at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category 5 (LR5) for diagnosing HCC and LI-RADS category M (LRM) for characterizing other non-HCC malignancies (OM) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multiple databases were searched for articles evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS and/or CT/MRI LI-RADS. A random-effects model was adopted to synthesize the summary estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of LR5 for diagnosing HCC and LRM for characterizing OM using CEUS and CT/MRI. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS LR5 for the diagnosis of HCC were 69% and 93%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity was 67% and the specificity, 93% of CT/MRI LR5 for HCC diagnosis. There was no significant difference between the overall diagnostic accuracy for HCC diagnosis of CEUS LR5 and that of CT/MRI LR5 in terms of diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (p = 0.55). The sensitivity was 84% with a specificity of 90% in the CEUS LRM for characterizing OM, while the sensitivity and specificity of CT/MRI LRM for characterizing OM was 63% and 95%. The DOR of CEUS LRM for characterizing OM was higher than that of CT/MRI LRM without significant difference (50.59 vs. 36.06, p = 0.34). This meta-analysis indicated that CEUS LI-RADS is qualified to characterize HCC and OM and may provide complementary information on liver nodules to CT/MRI LI-RADS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abdominal Ultrasound and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 536 KiB  
Review
AI-Based Radiological Imaging for HCC: Current Status and Future of Ultrasound
by Hitoshi Maruyama, Tadashi Yamaguchi, Hiroaki Nagamatsu and Shuichiro Shiina
Diagnostics 2021, 11(2), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020292 - 12 Feb 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3267
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer worldwide. Recent international guidelines request an identification of the stage and patient background/condition for an appropriate decision for the management direction. Radiomics is a technology based on the quantitative extraction of image characteristics from radiological imaging [...] Read more.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer worldwide. Recent international guidelines request an identification of the stage and patient background/condition for an appropriate decision for the management direction. Radiomics is a technology based on the quantitative extraction of image characteristics from radiological imaging modalities. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are the principal axis of the radiomics procedure and may provide various results from large data sets beyond conventional techniques. This review article focused on the application of the radiomics-related diagnosis of HCC using radiological imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound (B-mode, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and elastography)), and discussed the current role, limitation and future of ultrasound. Although the evidence has shown the positive effect of AI-based ultrasound in the prediction of tumor characteristics and malignant potential, posttreatment response and prognosis, there are still a number of issues in the practical management of patients with HCC. It is highly expected that the wide range of applications of AI for ultrasound will support the further improvement of the diagnostic ability of HCC and provide a great benefit to the patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abdominal Ultrasound and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

14 pages, 2460 KiB  
Case Report
Liver Injury and Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Evaluating Intrahepatic Recurrence in a Case of TACE-Refractory Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab Combination Therapy: A Case Report
by Satoshi Komiyama, Kazushi Numata, Katsuaki Ogushi, Makoto Chuma, Reiko Tanaka, Sawako Chiba, Masako Otani, Yoshiaki Inayama, Masayuki Nakano and Shin Maeda
Diagnostics 2021, 11(8), 1394; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081394 - 01 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2676
Abstract
A 67-year-old male with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) was diagnosed with postoperative intrahepatic recurrence for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nine sessions of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) proved ineffective, and the patient was diagnosed as having TACE-refractory disease and received seven cycles of atezolizumab–bevacizumab combination therapy. [...] Read more.
A 67-year-old male with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) was diagnosed with postoperative intrahepatic recurrence for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nine sessions of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) proved ineffective, and the patient was diagnosed as having TACE-refractory disease and received seven cycles of atezolizumab–bevacizumab combination therapy. After that, the patient developed hyperglycemia with the HbA1c elevation and the marked fasting serum C-peptide reduction and was diagnosed with developed immune-mediated diabetes (IMD) (T2DM exacerbation with insulin-dependent diabetes development). Subsequently, the hepatobiliary enzyme levels, which were high before the systemic therapy, worsened. Thus, we clinically diagnosed an exacerbation of liver injury due to TACE-induced liver injury complicated by drug-induced liver injury such as immune-mediated hepatotoxicity (IMH). Meanwhile, after contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed complete response, contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed to assess intrahepatic recurrence. We found that the latter modality allowed earlier and more definitive diagnosis of intrahepatic recurrence of HCC. Subsequently, despite systemic therapy discontinuation and steroids administration, the liver injury worsened, and the patient died. The autopsy revealed intrahepatic recurrence of HCC and extensive arterial obstruction by the beads used for TACE within the liver, which indicated that disturbed circulation was the primary cause of the liver injury and histopathologically confirmed IMD, but not IMH. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abdominal Ultrasound and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop