Research

16 pages, 3981 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma Receiving Ibrutinib for ≥5 Years in the RESONATE-2 Study

by Jennifer A. Woyach, Paul M. Barr, Thomas J. Kipps, Jacqueline C. Barrientos, Inhye E. Ahn, Paolo Ghia, Vincent Girardi, Emily Hsu, Mandy Jermain and Jan A. Burger

Cancers 2023, 15(2), 507; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15020507 - 13 Jan 2023

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 10391

Abstract

Primary results from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study demonstrated superior efficacy and tolerability with ibrutinib versus chlorambucil in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Here, we describe characteristics and outcomes of patients who received ibrutinib treatment for ≥5 years in [...] Read more.

Primary results from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study demonstrated superior efficacy and tolerability with ibrutinib versus chlorambucil in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Here, we describe characteristics and outcomes of patients who received ibrutinib treatment for ≥5 years in RESONATE-2. Patients aged ≥65 years with previously untreated CLL/SLL, without del(17p), were randomly assigned 1:1 to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity (n = 136) or chlorambucil 0.5–0.8 mg/kg for ≤12 cycles (n = 133). Baseline characteristics in ibrutinib-randomized patients (n = 136) were generally similar between patients on ibrutinib treatment for ≥5 years (n = 79) versus those on treatment for <5 years (n = 57). In patients on ibrutinib treatment for ≥5 years, complete response rates improved over time, reaching 42% by 5 years. Estimated 7-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 82% and 94%, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) led to dose reductions in 16/79 patients (20%); these AEs were resolved for 13/16 patients (81%). AEs led to dose holds (≥7 days) in 45/79 patients (57%); these AEs were resolved for 43/45 patients (96%). More than half (58%) of ibrutinib-randomized patients benefitted from ibrutinib treatment for ≥5 years regardless of baseline characteristics. Dose modification resolved AEs for most patients, thereby facilitating continued treatment. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Drugs in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2738 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Ibrutinib Does Not Impact CCR7-Mediated Homeostatic Migration in T-Cells from Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients

by Tamara Mateu-Albero, Ana Marcos-Jimenez, Stefanie Wissmann, Javier Loscertales, Fernando Terrón, Jens V. Stein, Cecilia Muñoz-Calleja and Carlos Cuesta-Mateos

Cancers 2022, 14(11), 2729; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14112729 - 31 May 2022

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2202

Abstract

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib has significantly changed treatment landscape in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Growing evidence supports ibrutinib to work beyond the effect on tumor cells by means of, for example, restoring functionality of the T-cell compartment and increasing circulating T-cell numbers. [...] Read more.

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib has significantly changed treatment landscape in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Growing evidence supports ibrutinib to work beyond the effect on tumor cells by means of, for example, restoring functionality of the T-cell compartment and increasing circulating T-cell numbers. Recent evidence suggests T-cell enhanced expansion, rather than increased egress from secondary lymphoid organs (SLO), as a root cause for ibrutinib-induced lymphocytosis. However, whether the latter physiological change is also a consequence of a forced retention in blood remains undisclosed. Since CCR7 is the main chemokine receptor taking over the homing of T-cells from peripheral compartments to lymph nodes and other SLO, we aimed to investigate the impact of ibrutinib on CCR7 functionality in T-cells. To this end, we documented receptor expression in T-cells from a large cohort of ibrutinib-treated CLL patients, and performed different in vivo and in vitro migration models. Overall, our data confirm that CCR7 expression or receptor-mediated migration in CLL T-cells is not affected by ibrutinib. Furthermore, it does not modulate CCR7-driven homing nor nodal interstitial migration. Together, our results support that ibrutinib-induced CLL T-cell accumulation in the blood stream is not derived from an impairment of CCR7-driven recirculation between the SLO and bloodstream, and therefore T-cell expansion is the most plausible cause. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Drugs in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

12 pages, 821 KiB

Open AccessReview

Non-Covalent Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

by Skye Montoya and Meghan C. Thompson

Cancers 2023, 15(14), 3648; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143648 - 17 Jul 2023

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2785

Abstract

Covalent Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cBTKi) have led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). These targeted oral therapies are administered as standard treatments in both the front-line and relapsed and/or refractory settings. Given their administration as a [...] Read more.

Covalent Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cBTKi) have led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). These targeted oral therapies are administered as standard treatments in both the front-line and relapsed and/or refractory settings. Given their administration as a continuous therapy with a “treat-to-progression” strategy, limitations of their use include discontinuation due to toxicity or from progression of the disease. Non-covalent Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ncBTKi) distinguish themselves by binding reversibly to the BTK target, which may address the limitations of toxicity and acquired resistance seen with cBTKi. Several ncBTKis have been studied preclinically and in clinical trials, including pirtobrutinib and nemtabrutinib. Pirtobrutinib, which is now FDA approved for relapsed and/or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), has shown outstanding safety and preliminary efficacy in CLL in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials, with phase 3 trials underway. This agent may fill an unmet medical need for CLL patients requiring treatment after a cBTKi. Pirtobrutinib is particularly promising for the treatment of “double exposed” CLL, defined as CLL requiring treatment after both a cBTKi and venetoclax. Some patients have now developedacquired resistance to pirtobrutinib, and resistance mechanisms (including novel acquired mutations in BTK outside of the C481 position) have been recently described. Further study regarding the mechanisms of resistance to pirtobrutinib in patients without prior cBTKi exposure, as well as the potential for cross-resistance between cBTKi and ncBTKis, may be important to help inform where ncBTKis will ultimately fit in the treatment sequencing paradigm for CLL. An emerging clinical challenge is the treatment of CLL after ncBTKi discontinuation. Novel therapeutic strategies are being investigated to address the treatment of patients following disease progression on ncBTKis. Such strategies include novel agents (BTK degraders, bispecific antibody therapy, CAR T-cell therapy, PKC-beta inhibitors) as well as combination approaches incorporating a ncBTKi (e.g., pirtobrutinib and venetoclax) that may help overcome this acquired resistance. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Drugs in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 761 KiB

Open AccessReview

Treatment of Richter Transformation of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the Modern Era

by Robert Briski and Justin Taylor

Cancers 2023, 15(6), 1857; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061857 - 20 Mar 2023

Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4437

Abstract

Richter Transformation (RT) refers to the development of an aggressive lymphoma in the setting of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). While many variants of RT are recognized, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RT-DLBCL) is the most common (80%), followed by Hodgkin’s lymphoma (RT-HL, 19%). Diagnosis [...] Read more.

Richter Transformation (RT) refers to the development of an aggressive lymphoma in the setting of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). While many variants of RT are recognized, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RT-DLBCL) is the most common (80%), followed by Hodgkin’s lymphoma (RT-HL, 19%). Diagnosis is based upon histologic evaluation of clinically suspicious lymph nodes. Positron emission tomography (PET) may be used to select the node of interest for biopsy. Although clonality testing is not a prerequisite of RT diagnosis, it has significant implications for survival. Clonally related DLBCL carries the worst prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of less than one year in the era of combination chemotherapies with or without anti-CD20 antibodies. Prognosis has improved with the use of stem cell transplant and newer agents such as targeted therapy and newer forms of immunotherapy. Consideration of a clinical trial is encouraged. This review describes our current understanding of RT and focuses on treatment of RT-DLBCL, including clinical trials in progress and new therapies in development. We also report an illustrative example of a patient with clonally related DLBCL who survived two years after diagnosis without the use of combination chemotherapy. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Drugs in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1075 KiB

Open AccessReview

Cellular Therapies in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Richter’s Transformation: Recent Developments in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells, Natural Killer Cells, and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

by Catherine C. Coombs, Saumya Easaw, Natalie S. Grover and Susan M. O’Brien

Cancers 2023, 15(6), 1838; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061838 - 18 Mar 2023

Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2075

Abstract

Cellular therapies can be viewed as both the newest and oldest techniques for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and Richter’s transformation (RT). On one hand, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) has been available for decades, though its use is diminishing with the [...] Read more.

Cellular therapies can be viewed as both the newest and oldest techniques for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and Richter’s transformation (RT). On one hand, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) has been available for decades, though its use is diminishing with the increasing availability of effective novel targeted agents, especially in CLL. Among newer techniques, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) have demonstrated astounding efficacy in several hematologic malignancies, leading to FDA approval and use in clinical practice. However, though CLL is the earliest disease type for which CAR-T were studied, development has been slower and has yet to lead to regulatory approval. Owing partially to its rarity but also due to the aggressive behavior of RT, CAR-T in RT have only been minimally explored. Here, we will focus on the applications of cellular therapies in CLL and RT, specifically reviewing more recent data related to alloHSCT in the novel-agent era and CAR-T cell development in CLL/RT, focusing on safety and efficacy successes and limitations. We will review strategies to improve upon CAR-T efficacy and discuss ongoing trials utilizing CAR-T in CLL/RT, as well as emerging technologies, such as allogeneic CAR-T and natural killer CAR (CAR NK) cells. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Drugs in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1777 KiB

Open AccessReview

Emerging Therapies in CLL in the Era of Precision Medicine

by Prajish Iyer and Lili Wang

Cancers 2023, 15(5), 1583; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051583 - 03 Mar 2023

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3203

Abstract

Over the past decade, the treatment landscape of CLL has vastly changed from the conventional FC (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide) and FCR (FC with rituximab) chemotherapies to targeted therapies, including inhibitors of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) as well as inhibitors [...] Read more.

Over the past decade, the treatment landscape of CLL has vastly changed from the conventional FC (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide) and FCR (FC with rituximab) chemotherapies to targeted therapies, including inhibitors of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) as well as inhibitors of BCL2. These treatment options dramatically improved clinical outcomes; however, not all patients respond well to these therapies, especially high-risk patients. Clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1, CTLA4) and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) or NK (CAR NK) cell treatment have shown some efficacy; still, long-term outcomes and safety issues have yet to be determined. CLL remains an incurable disease. Thus, there are unmet needs to discover new molecular pathways with targeted or combination therapies to cure the disease. Large-scale genome-wide whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing studies have discovered genetic alterations associated with disease progression, refined the prognostic markers in CLL, identified mutations underlying drug resistance, and pointed out critical targets to treat the disease. More recently, transcriptome and proteome landscape characterization further stratified the disease and revealed novel therapeutic targets in CLL. In this review, we briefly summarize the past and present available single or combination therapies, focusing on potential emerging therapies to address the unmet clinical needs in CLL. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Drugs in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 272 KiB

Open AccessReview

A History of Targeted Therapy Development and Progress in Novel–Novel Combinations for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

by Matthew Karr and Lindsey Roeker

Cancers 2023, 15(4), 1018; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041018 - 06 Feb 2023

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2679

Abstract

Over the last 10 years, the traditional treatment paradigms for CLL have been upended as the use of traditional chemoimmunotherapy regimens has declined in favor of novel targeted therapies. Targeted therapies have become the new standard of care in CLL given their superior [...] Read more.

Over the last 10 years, the traditional treatment paradigms for CLL have been upended as the use of traditional chemoimmunotherapy regimens has declined in favor of novel targeted therapies. Targeted therapies have become the new standard of care in CLL given their superior progression-free survival (and overall survival, in some cases) when compared with chemoimmunotherapy, as well as their improved toxicity profiles. Targeted agents are FDA approved for the treatment of CLL including ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and venetoclax. Importantly, as opposed to traditional chemotherapy regimens, the benefits of these targeted therapies appear to be consistent regardless of high-risk mutational status. In this review, we discuss the pivotal CLL studies of the last decade and the data supporting doublet and triplet novel–novel combinations. We explore the use of new surrogate end points for PFS/OS in targeted therapies such as undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) and their potential role in minimizing toxicity by permitting earlier treatment discontinuation. We also highlight areas that warrant further exploration and future studies that may help address some of these key questions. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Drugs in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia)

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

19 pages, 1791 KiB

Open AccessSystematic Review

Efficacy and Safety of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Monotherapy Compared with Combination Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by Thi Thuy Nguyen, Nguyen Thanh Nhu, Van Khoi Tran, Tran Thuc Huan Nguyen and Chiou-Feng Lin

Cancers 2023, 15(7), 1996; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15071996 - 27 Mar 2023

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1786

Abstract

The effectiveness and safety of combination treatments such as chemoimmunotherapies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) remain controversial. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) are an effective therapy for CLL/SLL patients. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of [...] Read more.

The effectiveness and safety of combination treatments such as chemoimmunotherapies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) remain controversial. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) are an effective therapy for CLL/SLL patients. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of BTKis versus combination therapy in CLL/SLL patients. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, and Embase databases through February 2023 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four RCTs (including 1510 patients) were found and met the inclusion criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved with BTKis when compared to the combination therapy (hazard ratio (HR), 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22–0.40), while a pooled analysis of overall survival did not favor single-agent BTKis over the combination therapy (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.67–1.15). We observed consistent benefits for PFS among patients with high-risk disease characteristics. Although there was no difference in complete response between the two arms (risk ratio (RR), 0.54; 95% CI, 0.20–1.46), BTKi use was related to a better overall response rate (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04–1.16). The risk of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) was comparable between the two arms (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55–1.23). However, the risk of grade ≥3 AEs was significantly lower in the second-generation BTKi group than in the combination therapy group (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54–0.98). Overall, BTKis have superior efficacy compared to the combination regimens in patients with untreated or treated CLL/SLL without excess toxicity. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and determine the optimal therapy for managing patients with CLL/SLL. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Drugs in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Targeted Drugs in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Published Papers (8 papers)

Research

Review

Other

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI