Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatocellular Tumors (Volume II)

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2024 | Viewed by 2655

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
First Department of Internal Medicine, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
Interests: NASH; HCC; liver biology; liver immunology; HBV; HCV; clinical liver diseases
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41221 Larissa, Greece
Interests: colorectal liver metastases; bariatric surgery
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue is the Second Edition of a previous Special Issue, “Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatocellular Tumors” (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers/special_issues/Diagnosis_Treatment_Hepatocellular).

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent primary liver cancer, accounting for >80% of primary liver cancers worldwide, with geographical variations among its prevalence. It is the leading cause of death in patients with cirrhosis, with an annual HCC incidence of 1–6%. The diagnosis of HCC, relying solely on noninvasive criteria, is currently under debate due to the need for molecular information that necessitates tissue biopsies, while therapy is provided in accordance with tumor stages and the anticipated advantages of major interventions, following the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. Principally, resection, transplantation and local ablation are most commonly performed in patients with early-stage HCC tumors, while TACE and systemic therapy are respectively the preferred treatment options for intermediate- and advanced-stage tumors. However, the HCC tumor immune microenvironment (TME) affects response to current anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies. Therefore, an enhanced understanding of the immunobiology of TME is essential for the development of predictive biomarkers of patient stratification and strategies of drug combinations to improve therapeutic efficacy, especially for patients with tumors unresponsive to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Taking into account the health burden of HCC worldwide, with this Special Issue we aim to enhance our knowledge of innovative diagnostic and prognostic methods, and to discuss experimentation with different novel treatment modalities, believed to be of utmost priority to progress in our seemingly never-ending fight against hepatocellular cancer.

To date, there are no definite biomarkers in HCC that can accurately predict response or resistance to ICIs, while as the HCC treatment regimens have shifted towards immunotherapy, the identification of potent predictive and prognostic biomarkers has attracted attention. Although HCC formation has been attributed to certain viral or non-viral causes, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), is a major driver of HCC as well . Recent data suggest that NASH-related HCC might have decreased sensitivity to immunotherapy, due to the presence of CD8+ T cells and, especially, of the hepatic steatosis-induced CXCR6+ subset that was correlated with hepatocyte injury and potentiated the pathogenesis of NASH-related HCC via the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and direct hepatocyte killing, mediated by the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) . Moreover, local and systemic inflammation are considered hallmarks of cancer, and they have a pivotal role in HCC pathogenesis and progression . An increased peripheral blood absolute neutrophil count and an elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR ≥ 5) are considered markers of advanced disease, poor prognosis, and poor response to treatment with hepatic resection, transplantation, locoregional therapy, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with HCC. Indeed, systemic inflammation measured by NLR is independently a negative prognostic factor for patients with HCC under ICI therapy [6]. The measurement of the NLR across various time points could provide insight into how different values of this inflammatory marker could accurately predict patient response to systemic therapy, patient outcomes, or the development of adverse events (AEs).

In the clinical setting of early-stage, operable HCC, the optimal liver function reserve, good performance status, greater potential to tolerate immune-related toxicities, and increased chances of cure in this patient population provide support for the neoadjuvant use of immunotherapy. For patients with inoperable disease at diagnosis, immunotherapy may provide a downstaging strategy capable of converting a patient into a resection candidate. Similarly, neoadjuvant immunotherapy administered to patients awaiting LT may achieve downstaging of patients within the MC or provide prognostic information useful when deciding transplant eligibility, although safety data regarding the risk of immunotherapy-induced rejection represent a significant knowledge gap, given the long half-lives of commonly used agents. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in HCC may improve surgical outcomes, treat micrometastatic disease early in the disease trajectory , but objectives for future studies will include understanding the characteristics and prognostic importance of response to neoadjuvant therapy, devising the optimal combinations of agents and duration of therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, and determining whether subsequent adjuvant therapy after definitive surgical treatment will be required in all patients.

Prof. Dr. Georgios Germanidis
Prof. Dr. Dimitris C. Zacharoulis
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • HCC
  • diagnosis
  • BCLC-B
  • BCLC-C
  • anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy
  • TKIs
  • combinations
  • TME
  • addiction loops
  • interventions
  • established data
  • neoadjuvant treatment
  • adjuvant treatment
  • definitive surgical treatment

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 2358 KiB  
Article
Regular Alpha-Fetoprotein Tests Boost Curative Treatment and Survival for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients in an Endemic Area
by Joo Hyun Oh, Jonghyun Lee, Eileen L. Yoon, Soung Won Jeong, Soon Sun Kim, Young Eun Chon, Sang Bong Ahn and Dae Won Jun
Cancers 2024, 16(1), 150; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16010150 - 28 Dec 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 594
Abstract
Guidelines vary on alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. This study aims to reassess AFP’s role in HCC surveillance, utilizing a comprehensive, recent, nationwide cohort. Utilizing the National Health Claims Database from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, this research included [...] Read more.
Guidelines vary on alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. This study aims to reassess AFP’s role in HCC surveillance, utilizing a comprehensive, recent, nationwide cohort. Utilizing the National Health Claims Database from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, this research included data from 185,316 HCC patients registered between 2008 and 2018. Specifically, 81,520 patients diagnosed with HCC from 2008 to 2014 were analyzed. The study focused primarily on mortality and, secondarily, on the status of curative treatments. Multivariate analysis revealed that frequent AFP testing significantly impacts overall survival in HCC patients. Specifically, each additional AFP test correlated with a 6% relative improvement in survival (hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.940–0.947, p < 0.001). Patients who underwent AFP testing three or more times within two years prior to HCC diagnosis showed improved survival rates, with 55.6% receiving liver transplantation or hepatectomy. This trend was particularly pronounced in hepatitis B patients undergoing antiviral treatment. The findings highlight the potential of regular AFP testing to enhance survival in HCC patients, especially those with hepatitis B. Integrating frequent AFP testing with ultrasonography could increase the likelihood of early detection and access to curative treatments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatocellular Tumors (Volume II))
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 707 KiB  
Article
Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Lenvatinib following Immunotherapy: A Real World Evidence Study
by Mathias E. Palmer, Jennifer J. Gile, Michael H. Storandt, Zhaohui Jin, Tyler J. Zemla, Nguyen H. Tran and Amit Mahipal
Cancers 2023, 15(19), 4867; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194867 - 06 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1333
Abstract
Background: Lenvatinib, a multikinase inhibitor, is an FDA-approved treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the first-line setting. Recent trial data have established atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as well as tremelimumab plus durvalumab as preferred first-line treatment options for advanced HCC. The role of [...] Read more.
Background: Lenvatinib, a multikinase inhibitor, is an FDA-approved treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the first-line setting. Recent trial data have established atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as well as tremelimumab plus durvalumab as preferred first-line treatment options for advanced HCC. The role of lenvatinib following progression on immunotherapy in patients with advanced HCC remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a multicentric, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced HCC diagnosed between 2010 and 2021 at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida who received immunotherapy followed by lenvatinib. Median overall survival and progression-free survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and responses were determined using RECIST 1.1. Adverse events were determined using CTCAE v 4.0. Results: We identified 53 patients with advanced HCC who received lenvatinib following progression on immunotherapy. Forty five (85%) patients had a Child Pugh class A at diagnosis, while 30 (58%) patients were still Child Pugh A at time of lenvatinib initiation. Lenvatinib was administered as a second-line treatment in 85% of the patients. The median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 3.2–6.6), and the median OS from the time of lenvatinib initiation was 12.8 months (95% CI: 6.7–19.5). In patients with Child Pugh class A, the median OS and PFS was 14 and 5.2 months, respectively. Race, gender, and Child Pugh class was associated with OS on multivariate analysis. Discussion: Our study, using real-world data, suggests that patients benefit from treatment with lenvatinib following progression on immunotherapy in advanced HCC. The optimal sequencing of therapy for patients with advanced HCC following progression on immunotherapy remains unknown, and these results need to be validated in a clinical trial. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatocellular Tumors (Volume II))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop