Neurodegeneration and Cancers

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Tumor Microenvironment".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2021) | Viewed by 16617

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Hans Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
Interests: Aging-related CNS disorders, neurodegenerative disorders, senescence-like processes in neurons, neuronal DNA damage and repair, atypical neuronal cell cycle, extrachromosomal circular DNA, axonal regeneration

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
Interests: aging-related hematological disorders; multiple myeloma; myeloma-stroma cell interplay; intraclonal heterogeneity; epigenetic cancer treatment; autologous stem cell transplantation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Neurodegeneration and cancer are among the biggest causes of morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Despite fundamental differences at various levels, these two disease classes share striking commonalities: Both entities are associated with molecular and cellular hallmarks of aging, and mechanisms implicated in aging are crucial in the pathogenesis of both disorders. Among such signatures, genomic stress appears to be of particular relevance as it results in, e.g., DNA strand breaks, gene copy number alterations, and telomere instability. Understudied in the context of DNA integrity are modulators of genomic plasticity, such as extrachromosomal circular DNAs, and their potential to change gene dosages and cellular biology in virtually any cell and tissue type. Similar considerations relate to the class of multitarget microRNAs, which are evidenced to interfere with genes and cellular pathways involved in both carcinogenesis and neuropathologies. Furthermore, microRNAs influence oncogene-induced senescence and might regulate senescence independently of a tumor environment.

Tightly linked to these DNA alterations is the observation that several neurodegenerative pathologies, similar to cancer, are apparently initiated by a loss in cell cycle control. Whereas defective cell cycle surveillance is causative in excessive cell proliferation in cancer, loss in cell cycle repression in the nominally postmitotic neuronal context elicits atypical abortive cell cycle events that will either eliminate a neuron by apoptosis or be putatively repurposed as an alternative DNA repair strategy. Remarkable in this context is the observation that neurons can adopt senescence-like features in terms of marker expression and telomere erosion, similar to the signs of replicative senescence typical for cells with a high proliferative index. Long-term senescence changes the cellular milieu and triggers the senescence-associated secretory phenotype that can drive chronic inflammation and provide a microenvironment favorable for malignant cell transformation, tumor relapse and immune escape, as well as neurodegeneration. The intricate interplay between cancer and neurodegeneration also involves other immunological and inflammatory responses, as evidenced for paraneoplastic syndromes that affect the nervous system and the neurodegenerative features manifest in malignant histiocytosis.

Other well-studied examples of cellular events overlapping in cancer and neurodegeneration include epigenetic alterations, loss of protein and metabolic homeostasis, mitochondrial dysfunction, increased inflammation, disturbed intercellular communication and autophagy, as well as stem cell exhaustion.

In summary, such recent discoveries draw a picture of a broad overlap of the mechanisms that converge at the interface of cancer and neurodegeneration. Accordingly, research in neurodegeneration is expected to profit from breakthrough investigations in cancer and vice versa, and antitumor drug interventions have already been proven to be beneficial in neurodegeneration. Since both pathologies are strongly age-related, future aspects might also focus on mechanisms linked to antagonistic pleiotropy—a functional switch related to aging.

This Special Issue invites contributions based on original research manuscripts, review articles, and perspectives that address the molecular, cellular, and pathophysiological interplay of oncogenesis and neurodegeneration and provide a preview for future experimental designs and therapeutic approaches that consider overlapping beneficial roles, while considering putative ambivalent roles in cancer surveillance or neuroprotection.

Dr. Alexandra Kretz
Dr. Annamaria Brioli
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Cancer
  • Cancer treatment
  • Cell cycle
  • DNA damage
  • Extrachromosomal circular DNA
  • Genomic instability
  • Hematological disorders
  • Neurodegeneration
  • Neurodegeneration treatment
  • Senescence

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

36 pages, 8140 KiB  
Article
A Computational Analysis in a Cohort of Parkinson’s Disease Patients and Clock-Modified Colorectal Cancer Cells Reveals Common Expression Alterations in Clock-Regulated Genes
by Müge Yalçin, Deeksha Malhan, Alireza Basti, Ana Rita Peralta, Joaquim J. Ferreira and Angela Relógio
Cancers 2021, 13(23), 5978; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13235978 - 28 Nov 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3998
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests a role for circadian dysregulation in prompting disease-related phenotypes in mammals. Cancer and neurodegenerative disorders are two aging related diseases reported to be associated with circadian disruption. In this study, we investigated a possible effect of circadian disruption in Parkinson’s [...] Read more.
Increasing evidence suggests a role for circadian dysregulation in prompting disease-related phenotypes in mammals. Cancer and neurodegenerative disorders are two aging related diseases reported to be associated with circadian disruption. In this study, we investigated a possible effect of circadian disruption in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and colorectal cancer (CRC). We used high-throughput data sets retrieved from whole blood of idiopathic PD (IPD) patients and time course data sets derived from an in vitro model of CRC including the wildtype and three core-clock knockout (KO) cell lines. Several gene expression alterations in IPD patients resembled the expression profiles in the core-clock KO cells. These include expression changes in DBP, GBA, TEF, SNCA, SERPINA1 and TGFB1. Notably, our results pointed to alterations in the core-clock network in IPD patients when compared to healthy controls and revealed variations in the expression profile of PD-associated genes (e.g., HRAS and GBA) upon disruption of the core-clock genes. Our study characterizes changes at the transcriptomic level following circadian clock disruption on common cellular pathways associated with cancer and neurodegeneration (e.g., immune system, energy metabolism and RNA processing), and it points to a significant influence on the overall survival of colon cancer patients for several genes resulting from our analysis (e.g., TUBB6, PAK6, SLC11A1). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurodegeneration and Cancers)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

30 pages, 4034 KiB  
Article
Transcriptomic and Genetic Associations between Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, and Cancer
by Jaume Forés-Martos, Cesar Boullosa, David Rodrigo-Domínguez, Jon Sánchez-Valle, Beatriz Suay-García, Joan Climent, Antonio Falcó, Alfonso Valencia, Joan Anton Puig-Butillé, Susana Puig and Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos
Cancers 2021, 13(12), 2990; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13122990 - 15 Jun 2021
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 5425
Abstract
Alzheimer’s (AD) and Parkinson’s diseases (PD) are the two most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders in human populations. Epidemiological studies have shown that patients suffering from either condition present a reduced overall risk of cancer than controls (i.e., inverse comorbidity), suggesting that neurodegeneration provides a [...] Read more.
Alzheimer’s (AD) and Parkinson’s diseases (PD) are the two most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders in human populations. Epidemiological studies have shown that patients suffering from either condition present a reduced overall risk of cancer than controls (i.e., inverse comorbidity), suggesting that neurodegeneration provides a protective effect against cancer. Reduced risks of several site-specific tumors, including colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers, have also been observed in AD and PD. By contrast, an increased risk of melanoma has been described in PD patients (i.e., direct comorbidity). Therefore, a fundamental question to address is whether these associations are due to shared genetic and molecular factors or are explained by other phenomena, such as flaws in epidemiological studies, exposure to shared risk factors, or the effect of medications. To this end, we first evaluated the transcriptomes of AD and PD post-mortem brain tissues derived from the hippocampus and the substantia nigra and analyzed their similarities to those of a large panel of 22 site-specific cancers, which were obtained through differential gene expression meta-analyses of array-based studies available in public repositories. Genes and pathways that were deregulated in both disorders in each analyzed pair were examined. Second, we assessed potential genetic links between AD, PD, and the selected cancers by establishing interactome-based overlaps of genes previously linked to each disorder. Then, their genetic correlations were computed using cross-trait LD score regression and GWAS summary statistics data. Finally, the potential role of medications in the reported comorbidities was assessed by comparing disease-specific differential gene expression profiles to an extensive collection of differential gene expression signatures generated by exposing cell lines to drugs indicated for AD, PD, and cancer treatment (LINCS L1000). We identified significant inverse associations of transcriptomic deregulation between AD hippocampal tissues and breast, lung, liver, and prostate cancers, and between PD substantia nigra tissues and breast, lung, and prostate cancers. Moreover, significant direct (same direction) associations of deregulation were observed between AD and PD and brain and thyroid cancers, as well as between PD and kidney cancer. Several biological processes, including the immune system, oxidative phosphorylation, PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling, and the cell cycle, were found to be deregulated in both cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. Significant genetic correlations were found between PD and melanoma and prostate cancers. Several drugs indicated for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders and cancer, such as galantamine, selegiline, exemestane, and estradiol, were identified as potential modulators of the comorbidities observed between neurodegeneration and cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurodegeneration and Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

23 pages, 1853 KiB  
Review
Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Frailty in Older Adults over the Spectrum of Cancer: A Narrative Review
by Mariya Muzyka, Luca Tagliafico, Gianluca Serafini, Ilaria Baiardini, Fulvio Braido, Alessio Nencioni and Fiammetta Monacelli
Cancers 2022, 14(1), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010258 - 05 Jan 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3299
Abstract
Background: The interplay between different neuropsychiatric conditions, beyond dementia, in the presence of a diagnosis of cancer in older adults may mediate patients’ fitness and cancer-related outcomes. Here, we aimed to investigate the presence of depression, sleep disturbances, anxiety, attitude, motivation, and support [...] Read more.
Background: The interplay between different neuropsychiatric conditions, beyond dementia, in the presence of a diagnosis of cancer in older adults may mediate patients’ fitness and cancer-related outcomes. Here, we aimed to investigate the presence of depression, sleep disturbances, anxiety, attitude, motivation, and support in older adults receiving a diagnosis of cancer and the dimension of frailty in order to understand the magnitude of the problem. Methods: This review provides an update of the state of the art based on references from searches of PubMed between 2000 and June 2021. Results: The evidence obtained underscored the tight association between frailty and unfavorable clinical outcomes in older adults with cancer. Given the intrinsic correlation of neuropsychiatric disorders with frailty in the realm of cancer survivorship, the evidence showed they might have a correlation with unfavorable clinical outcomes, late-life geriatric syndromes and higher degree of frailty. Conclusions: The identification of common vulnerabilities among neuropsychiatric disorders, frailty, and cancer may hold promise to unmask similar shared pathways, potentially intercepting targeted new interventions over the spectrum of cancer with the delivery of better pathways of care for older adults with cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurodegeneration and Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1221 KiB  
Review
Molecular Mechanisms of Senescence and Implications for the Treatment of Myeloid Malignancies
by Philipp Ernst and Florian H. Heidel
Cancers 2021, 13(4), 612; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040612 - 04 Feb 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2881
Abstract
Senescence is a cellular state that is involved in aging-associated diseases but may also prohibit the development of pre-cancerous lesions and tumor growth. Senescent cells are actively secreting chemo- and cytokines, and this senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) can contribute to both early anti-tumorigenic [...] Read more.
Senescence is a cellular state that is involved in aging-associated diseases but may also prohibit the development of pre-cancerous lesions and tumor growth. Senescent cells are actively secreting chemo- and cytokines, and this senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) can contribute to both early anti-tumorigenic and long-term pro-tumorigenic effects. Recently, complex mechanisms of cellular senescence and their influence on cellular processes have been defined in more detail and, therefore, facilitate translational development of targeted therapies. In this review, we aim to discuss major molecular pathways involved in cellular senescence and potential therapeutic strategies, with a specific focus on myeloid malignancies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurodegeneration and Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop