Multimodality Management of Sarcomas

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 10 June 2024 | Viewed by 6243

Special Issue Editors


grade E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
2. Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69373 Lyon, France
Interests: sarcomas; breast cancer; renal cell carcinoma

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical School of Crete University Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
Interests: sarcoma; melanoma; breast cancer; colorectal cancer, peritoneal carcinomatosis; intraperitoneal chemotherapy; HIPEC

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Center for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
2. Rhein-Main Sarcoma Center at University Cancer Center, University Medical Center of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
Interests: orthopedic surgery; orthopedic oncology; bone sarcoma; soft tissue sarcoma; pathological fractures; metastatic disease; benign bone tumours and tumour-like lesions; osteology; benign soft tissue tumors

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Due to their rarity and heterogeneity, with a wide variety of histological subtypes, biological behaviors and tumor localization, the optimal management of sarcomas remains challenging. The treatment of sarcomas has to be individualized and consists, usually, of a combination of modalities. Currently, sarcomas are managed in a multimodality manner.

Initial appropriate imaging is of outmost importance to demonstrate the exact localization and extension of the tumor and its relation to adjacent structures, in order to facilitate the performance of a diagnostic core needle biopsy and the planning of a surgical procedure when systemic disease is excluded. A preoperative biopsy is of outmost importance to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors and to define the sarcoma subtype. The pathological examination of those rare and heterogenous sarcoma tumors is very demanding and expertise is required. The treatment plan of each sarcoma is personalized according to its imaging and pathology.

Until recently, most extremity soft tissue sarcomas were locally treated with amputation; nowadays, the majority of patients receive a limb-salvage treatment with a wide excision of the tumor and radiotherapy. Current evidence shows that preoperative radiotherapy may be preferred over the typical postoperative radiotherapy, whereas in low-risk patients radiotherapy may even be omitted. In selected cases, preoperative systemic chemotherapy or isolated limb perfusion may be indicated in an attempt to preserve the extremity. For retroperitoneal sarcomas, recently, a more aggressive surgical approach has been advocated for, whereas the exact role of preoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy to facilitate resection and to reduce the high risk of local recurrence has still to be defined. The systemic therapy of soft tissue sarcomas, either as an adjuvant treatment or for metastatic disease, has evolved from the classical anthracycline-based regime, to a more individualized histology-driven chemotherapy, whereas novel drugs have been developed. Bone sarcomas are usually also managed in a multimodality manner, depending on the histological type. Although localized chondrosarcomas are initially treated by surgical excision and/or radiotherapy, Ewing sarcomas are traditionally treated with systemic chemotherapy, followed by a local treatment, including surgery and/or radiotherapy, and the continuation of systemic chemotherapy. Similarly, osteosarcomas are usually treated with a combination of chemotherapy and surgery, with or without radiotherapy and the continuation of chemotherapy.

As this illustrates, the management of sarcomas is challenging and multimodal, including radiology and pathology for initial diagnosis and, subsequently, surgery, and through the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for definite treatment in order to achieve optimal oncological and functional outcomes. The various aspects of this multimodality management and their current roles will be discussed in this Special Issue.

Prof. Dr. Jean-Yves Blay
Prof. Dr. Eelco de Bree
Prof. Dr. Frank Traub
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sarcomas
  • multimodal
  • pathology
  • radiology
  • surgery
  • chemotherapy
  • radiotherapy

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 934 KiB  
Article
Prices and Trends in FDA-Approved Medications for Sarcomas
by Caleb Hwang, Mark Agulnik and Brian Schulte
Cancers 2024, 16(8), 1545; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081545 - 18 Apr 2024
Viewed by 481
Abstract
Sarcomas represent a diverse set of both malignant and benign subtypes consisting of often rare and ultra-rare conditions. Over the course of the last decade, there have been numerous FDA approvals for agents treating various sarcoma subtypes. Given this burgeoning landscape of sarcoma [...] Read more.
Sarcomas represent a diverse set of both malignant and benign subtypes consisting of often rare and ultra-rare conditions. Over the course of the last decade, there have been numerous FDA approvals for agents treating various sarcoma subtypes. Given this burgeoning landscape of sarcoma treatments, we seek to review current FDA-approved agents with respect to their rates of incidence, approval rates, and financial costs. We gathered clinical trial data by searching FDA approval announcements from 2013 to 2023. We determined the 30 day and one year cost of therapy for patients of FDA-approved sarcoma treatments in the aforementioned timeframe. From 2013 to 2023, 14 medications have been FDA-approved for sarcoma subtypes. The 30-day dosing prices for these medications range from $11,162.86 to $46,926.00. Since 2013, the rates of approval for sarcoma medications have been higher than in prior decades. Nonetheless, there remains the potential for significant financial toxicity for patients living with sarcoma. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multimodality Management of Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2076 KiB  
Article
Improved Metastatic-Free Survival after Systematic Re-Excision Following Complete Macroscopic Unplanned Excision of Limb or Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma
by Francois Gouin, Audrey Michot, Mehrdad Jafari, Charles Honoré, Jean Camille Mattei, Alexandre Rochwerger, Mickael Ropars, Dimitri Tzanis, Philippe Anract, Sébastien Carrere, Dimitri Gangloff, Agnès Ducoulombier, Céleste Lebbe, Jérôme Guiramand, Denis Waast, Frédéric Marchal, François Sirveaux, Sylvain Causeret, Pierre Gimbergues, Fabrice Fiorenza, Brice Paquette, Pauline Soibinet, Jean-Marc Guilloit, Louis R. Le Nail, Franck Dujardin, David Brinkert, Claire Chemin-Airiau, Magali Morelle, Pierre Meeus, Marie Karanian, François Le Loarer, Gualter Vaz and Jean-Yves Blayadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2024, 16(7), 1365; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16071365 - 30 Mar 2024
Viewed by 522
Abstract
Background: Whether re-excision (RE) of a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of limb or trunk should be systematized as adjuvant care and if it would improve metastatic free survival (MFS) are still debated. The impact of resection margins after unplanned macroscopically complete excision (UE) [...] Read more.
Background: Whether re-excision (RE) of a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of limb or trunk should be systematized as adjuvant care and if it would improve metastatic free survival (MFS) are still debated. The impact of resection margins after unplanned macroscopically complete excision (UE) performed out of a NETSARC reference center or after second resection was further investigated. Methods: This large nationwide series used data from patients having experienced UE outside of a reference center from 2010 to 2019, collected in a French nationwide exhaustive prospective cohort NETSARC. Patient characteristics and survival distributions in patients reexcised (RE) or not (No-RE) are reported. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was conducted to adjust for classical prognosis factors. Subgroup analysis were performed to identify which patients may benefit from RE. Results: Out of 2371 patients with UE for STS performed outside NETSARC reference centers, 1692 patients were not reviewed by multidisciplinary board before treatment decision and had a second operation documented. Among them, 913 patients experienced re-excision, and 779 were not re-excised. Characteristics were significantly different regarding patient age, tumor site, size, depth, grade and histotype in patients re-excised (RE) or not (No-RE). In univariate analysis, final R0 margins are associated with a better MFS, patients with R1 margins documented at first surgery had a better MFS as compared to patients with first R0 resection. The study identified RE as an independent favorable factor for MFS (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.53–0.93; p = 0.013). All subgroups except older patients (>70 years) and patients with large tumors (>10 cm) had superior MFS with RE. Conclusions: RE might be considered in patients with STS of limb or trunk, with UE with macroscopic complete resection performed out of a reference center, and also in originally defined R0 margin resections, to improve LRFS and MFS. Systematic RE should not be advocated for patients older than 70 years, or with tumors greater than 10 cm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multimodality Management of Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2964 KiB  
Article
Evolution of Patterns of Care and Outcomes in the Real-Life Setting for Patients with Metastatic GIST Treated in Three French Expert Centers over Three Decades
by Maud Toulmonde, Derek Dinart, Mehdi Brahmi, Benjamin Verret, Myriam Jean-Denis, Françoise Ducimetière, Gregoire Desolneux, Pierre Méeus, Jean Palussière, Xavier Buy, Amine Bouhamama, Pauline Gillon, Armelle Dufresne, Clémence Hénon, François Le Loarer, Marie Karanian, Carine Ngo, Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier, Carine Bellera, Axel Le Cesne, Jean Yves Blay and Antoine Italianoadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2023, 15(17), 4306; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174306 - 28 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1000
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare mesenchymal tumors characterized by KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Over three decades, significant changes in drug discovery and loco-regional (LR) procedures have impacted treatment strategies. We assessed the evolution of treatment strategies for metastatic GIST patients treated in [...] Read more.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare mesenchymal tumors characterized by KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Over three decades, significant changes in drug discovery and loco-regional (LR) procedures have impacted treatment strategies. We assessed the evolution of treatment strategies for metastatic GIST patients treated in the three national coordinating centers of NetSarc, the French network of sarcoma referral centers endorsed by the National Institute of Cancers, from 1990 to 2018. The primary objective was to describe the clinical and biological profiles as well as the treatment modalities of patients with metastatic GIST in a real-life setting, including access to clinical trials and LR procedures in the metastatic setting. Secondary objectives were to assess (1) patients’ outcome in terms of time to next treatment (TNT) for each line of systemic treatment, (2) patients’ overall survival (OS), (3) evolution of patients’ treatment modalities and OS according to treatment access: <2002 (pre-imatinib approval), 2002–2006 (pre-sunitinib approval), 2006–2014 (pre-regorafenib approval), post 2014, and (4) the impact of clinical trials and LR procedures on TNT and OS in the metastatic setting. 1038 patients with a diagnosis of GIST made in one of the three participating centers between 1990 and 2018 were included in the national prospective database. Among them, 492 patients presented metastasis, either synchronous or metachronous. The median number of therapy lines in the metastatic setting was 3 (range 0–15). More than half of the patients (55%) participated in a clinical trial during the course of their metastatic disease and half (51%) underwent additional LR procedures on metastatic sites. The median OS in the metastatic setting was 83.4 months (95%CI [72.7; 97.9]). The median TNT was 26.7 months (95%CI [23.4; 32.3]) in first-line, 10.2 months (95%CI [8.6; 11.8]) in second line, 6.7 months (95%CI [5.3; 8.5]) in third line, and 5.5 months (95%CI [4.3; 6.7]) in fourth line, respectively. There was no statistical difference in OS in the metastatic setting between the four therapeutic periods (log rank, p = 0.18). In multivariate analysis, age, AFIP Miettinen classification, mutational status, surgery of the primary tumor, participation in a clinical trial in the first line and LR procedure to metastatic sites were associated with longer TNT in the first line, whereas age, mitotic index, mutational status, surgery of the primary tumor and LR procedure to metastatic sites were associated with longer OS. This real-life study advocates for early reference of metastatic GIST patients to expert centers to orchestrate the best access to future innovative clinical trials together with LR strategies and further improve GIST patients’ survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multimodality Management of Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 2106 KiB  
Review
Understanding the Role of Radio-Sensitizing Nanoparticles in Enhancing Pathologic Response in Soft Tissue Sarcomas
by Anastasia Stergioula, Evaggelos Pantelis, Vasileios Kontogeorgakos, Andreas C. Lazaris and Georgios Agrogiannis
Cancers 2023, 15(23), 5572; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15235572 - 24 Nov 2023
Viewed by 795
Abstract
High-atomic-number (Z) nanoparticles produce a cascade of low-energy secondary electrons and characteristic X-rays when ionized by X-ray irradiation. These secondary particles deposit their energy in the vicinity of the nanoparticles and, provided that the latter are selectively accumulated within tumor cells, this results [...] Read more.
High-atomic-number (Z) nanoparticles produce a cascade of low-energy secondary electrons and characteristic X-rays when ionized by X-ray irradiation. These secondary particles deposit their energy in the vicinity of the nanoparticles and, provided that the latter are selectively accumulated within tumor cells, this results in increased DNA damage and tumor cell deaths. This study reviews the utilization of high-Z nanoparticles in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that the dose is enhanced by approximately 1.2 when polyethelyne glycol (PEG)-modified gold nanoparticles, and from 1.4 to 1.8 when hafnium oxide nanoparticles (NBTXR3, Nanobiotix SA, France) are introduced into tumor cells and activated by X-ray beams. In a phase 2/3 clinical trial investigating the therapeutic benefit of using nanoparticles in preoperative external beam radiotherapy for locally advanced STS, the proportion of patients with a pathological complete response in their resected tumor was doubled when NBTXR3 nanoparticles were used. Additionally, a higher percentage of patients with complete tumor resection was observed in the NBTXR3 plus radiotherapy group. Similar toxicity profiles were found for both the NBTXR3 plus radiotherapy and the radiotherapy alone patient groups. The incorporation of radio-sensitizing nanoparticles in the preoperative radiotherapy of STS could enhance treatment outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multimodality Management of Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2772 KiB  
Review
Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Emerging Therapeutic Strategies
by Eelco de Bree, Dimosthenis Michelakis, Ioannis Heretis, Nikolaos Kontopodis, Konstantinos Spanakis, Eleni Lagoudaki, Maria Tolia, Michail Zografakis-Sfakianakis, Christos Ioannou and Dimitrios Mavroudis
Cancers 2023, 15(22), 5469; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225469 - 18 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1365
Abstract
Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS) is a rare and heterogenous disease for which surgery is the cornerstone of treatment. However, the local recurrence rate is much higher than in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities since wide resection is usually unfeasible in RPS [...] Read more.
Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS) is a rare and heterogenous disease for which surgery is the cornerstone of treatment. However, the local recurrence rate is much higher than in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities since wide resection is usually unfeasible in RPS due to its large size, indistinct tumour borders, anatomical constraints and the thinness of the overlying peritoneum. Local recurrence is the leading cause of death for low-grade RPS, whereas high-grade tumours are prone to distant metastases. In recent decades, the role of emerging therapeutic strategies, such as more extended surgery and (neo)adjuvant treatments to improve oncological outcome in primary localised RPS, has been extensively investigated. In this review, the recent data on the evolving multidisciplinary management of primary localised RPS are comprehensively discussed. The heterogeneity of RPS, with their different histological subtypes and biological behaviour, renders a standard therapeutic ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach inappropriate, and treatment should be modified according to histological type and malignancy grade. There is sufficient evidence that frontline extended surgery with compartmental resection including all ipsilateral retroperitoneal fat and liberal en bloc resection of adjacent organs and structures, even if they are not macroscopically involved, increases local tumour control in low-grade sarcoma and liposarcoma, but not in leiomyosarcoma for which complete macroscopic resection seems sufficient. Additionally, preoperative radiotherapy is not indicated for all RPSs, but seems to be beneficial in well-differentiated liposarcoma and grade I/II dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and probably in solitary fibrous tumour. Whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy is of benefit in high-grade RPS remains unclear from retrospective data and is subject of the ongoing randomised STRASS 2 trial, from which the results are eagerly awaited. Personalised, histology-tailored multimodality treatment is promising and will likely further evolve as our understanding of the molecular and genetic characteristics within RPS improves. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multimodality Management of Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3352 KiB  
Review
Patient-Derived Organoids as a Promising Tool for Multimodal Management of Sarcomas
by Songfeng Xu, ShihJye Tan and Ling Guo
Cancers 2023, 15(17), 4339; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174339 - 30 Aug 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1293
Abstract
The management of sarcomas, a diverse group of cancers arising from connective tissues, presents significant challenges due to their heterogeneity and limited treatment options. Patient-derived sarcoma organoids (PDSOs) have emerged as a promising tool in the multimodal management of sarcomas, offering unprecedented opportunities [...] Read more.
The management of sarcomas, a diverse group of cancers arising from connective tissues, presents significant challenges due to their heterogeneity and limited treatment options. Patient-derived sarcoma organoids (PDSOs) have emerged as a promising tool in the multimodal management of sarcomas, offering unprecedented opportunities for personalized medicine and improved treatment strategies. This review aims to explore the potential of PDSOs as a promising tool for multimodal management of sarcomas. We discuss the establishment and characterization of PDSOs, which realistically recapitulate the complexity and heterogeneity of the original tumor, providing a platform for genetic and molecular fidelity, histological resemblance, and functional characterization. Additionally, we discuss the applications of PDSOs in pathological and genetic evaluation, treatment screening and development, and personalized multimodal management. One significant advancement of PDSOs lies in their ability to guide personalized treatment decisions, enabling clinicians to assess the response and efficacy of different therapies in a patient-specific manner. Through continued research and development, PDSOs hold the potential to revolutionize sarcoma management and drive advancements in personalized medicine, biomarker discovery, preclinical modeling, and therapy optimization. The integration of PDSOs into clinical practice can ultimately improve patient outcomes and significantly impact the field of sarcoma treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multimodality Management of Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

Title: Neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities to avoid amputation. Which are valid treatment options?
Author: de Bree
Highlights: Locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities may require amputative surgery. The aim of neoadjuvant treatment is to minimize the need for amputation or surgery that leads to major functional impairment, with acceptable toxicity and without having a negative impact on survival. Various neoadjuvant treatment strategies have been proposed to reduce the risk of amputation and limb dysfunction.

Back to TopTop