Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 September 2022) | Viewed by 29076

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Gynecology, University Medical-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
Interests: breast cancer; breast cancer metastasis; ovarian cancer; mechanisms of metastasis; adhesion molecules; glycosylation; angiogenesis

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Gynecology, University Medical-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
Interests: breast cancer; breast cancer metastasis; ovarian cancer; mechanisms of metastasis; adhesion molecules; glycosylation; angiogenesis

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Gynecology, University Medical-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
Interests: breast cancer; breast cancer metastasis; ovarian cancer; mechanisms of metastasis; adhesion molecules; glycosylation; angiogenesis

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The incidence of brain metastases in advanced breast cancer patients has risen in the past years. Despite improvements in systemic treatment options in metastatic breast cancer, 15–30% of patients with metastatic breast cancer develop metastases in the central nervous system. Brain metastasis (BM) is not only associated with an extremely limited life expectancy, but also with severe neurological symptoms that strongly reduce the quality of life of almost all patients. Therefore, the improvement of management strategies for BM is an important clinical challenge.

The formation of BM as a multistep process is still poorly understood. In this context, a deeper knowledge of the molecular mechanisms involved in this process is essential in order to establish novel biomarkers for the identification and monitoring of high-risk patients, as well as for the identification of new targets to develop novel therapeutic strategies to improve cancer treatment and patient survival.

In this Special Issue, research on clinical and translational aspects, as well as review articles, should help to get better insights into the current knowledge and further perspectives of research on brain metastases in breast cancer patients.

Dr. Leticia Oliveira-Ferrer
Prof. Dr. Volkmar Müller
Prof. Dr. Isabell Witzel
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • brain metastasis
  • biomarker
  • blood–brain barrier
  • brain microenvironment

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review, Other

2 pages, 156 KiB  
Editorial
Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients—Need for Improvement
by Isabell Witzel, Leticia Oliveira-Ferrer and Volkmar Müller
Cancers 2020, 12(11), 3190; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113190 - 30 Oct 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1342
Abstract
The incidence of brain metastases (BM) in breast cancer patients is increasing [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review, Other

12 pages, 1028 KiB  
Article
Predicting Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases in the BMBC Registry—Comparison of Three Different GPA Prognostic Scores
by Kerstin Riecke, Volkmar Müller, Rudolf Weide, Marcus Schmidt, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Volker Möbus, Christoph Mundhenke, Arkadius Polasik, Kristina Lübbe, Tobias Hesse, Elena Laakmann, Marc Thill, Peter A. Fasching, Carsten Denkert, Tanja Fehm, Valentina Nekljudova, Julia Rey, Sibylle Loibl and Isabell Witzel
Cancers 2021, 13(4), 844; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040844 - 17 Feb 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2677
Abstract
Several scores have been developed in order to estimate the prognosis of patients with brain metastases (BM) by objective criteria. The aim of this analysis was to validate all three published graded-prognostic-assessment (GPA)-scores in a subcohort of 882 breast cancer (BC) patients with [...] Read more.
Several scores have been developed in order to estimate the prognosis of patients with brain metastases (BM) by objective criteria. The aim of this analysis was to validate all three published graded-prognostic-assessment (GPA)-scores in a subcohort of 882 breast cancer (BC) patients with BM in the Brain Metastases in the German Breast Cancer (BMBC) registry. The median age at diagnosis of BM was 57 years. All in all, 22.3% of patients (n = 197) had triple-negative, 33.4% (n = 295) luminal A like, 25.1% (n = 221) luminal B/HER2-enriched like and 19.2% (n = 169) HER2 positive like BC. Age ≥60 years, evidence of extracranial metastases (ECM), higher number of BM, triple-negative subtype and low Karnofsky-Performance-Status (KPS) were all associated with worse overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis (p < 0.001 each). All three GPA-scores were associated with OS. The breast-GPA showed the highest probability of classifying patients with survival above 12 months in the best prognostic group (specificity 68.7% compared with 48.1% for the updated breast-GPA and 21.8% for the original GPA). Sensitivities for predicting 3 months survival were very low for all scores. In this analysis, all GPA-scores showed only moderate diagnostic accuracy in predicting the OS of BC patients with BM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 7046 KiB  
Article
Blocking c-MET/ERBB1 Axis Prevents Brain Metastasis in ERBB2+ Breast Cancer
by Shailendra K. Gautam, Ranjana K. Kanchan, Jawed A. Siddiqui, Shailendra K. Maurya, Sanchita Rauth, Naveenkumar Perumal, Pranita Atri, Ramakanth C. Venkata, Kavita Mallya, Sameer Mirza, Moorthy P. Ponnusamy, Vimla Band, Sidharth Mahapatra, Maneesh Jain, Surinder K. Batra and Mohd Wasim Nasser
Cancers 2020, 12(10), 2838; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102838 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3738
Abstract
Brain metastasis (BrM) remains a significant cause of cancer-related mortality in epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (ERBB2+) breast cancer (BC) patients. We proposed here that a combination treatment of irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib (NER) and the c-MET inhibitor cabozantinib (CBZ) [...] Read more.
Brain metastasis (BrM) remains a significant cause of cancer-related mortality in epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (ERBB2+) breast cancer (BC) patients. We proposed here that a combination treatment of irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib (NER) and the c-MET inhibitor cabozantinib (CBZ) could prevent brain metastasis. To address this, we first tested the combination treatment of NER and CBZ in the brain-seeking ERBB2+ cell lines SKBrM3 and JIMT-1-BR3, and in ERBB2+ organoids that expressed the c-MET/ERBB1 axis. Next, we developed and characterized an orthotopic mouse model of spontaneous BrM and evaluated the therapeutic effect of CBZ and NER in vivo. The combination treatment of NER and CBZ significantly inhibited proliferation and migration in ERBB2+ cell lines and reduced the organoid growth in vitro. Mechanistically, the combination treatment of NER and CBZ substantially inhibited ERK activation downstream of the c-MET/ERBB1 axis. Orthotopically implanted SKBrM3+ cells formed primary tumor in the mammary fat pad and spontaneously metastasized to the brain and other distant organs. Combination treatment with NER and CBZ inhibited primary tumor growth and predominantly prevented BrM. In conclusion, the orthotopic model of spontaneous BrM is clinically relevant, and the combination therapy of NER and CBZ might be a useful approach to prevent BrM in BC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1143 KiB  
Article
Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Breast Cancer Patients with Asymptomatic Brain Metastases
by Elena Laakmann, Isabell Witzel, Tanja Neunhöffer, Rudolf Weide, Marcus Schmidt, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Volker Möbus, Christoph Mundhenke, Arkadius Polasik, Kristina Lübbe, Tobias Hesse, Kerstin Riecke, Marc Thill, Peter A. Fasching, Carsten Denkert, Tanja Fehm, Valentina Nekljudova, Julia Rey, Sibylle Loibl and Volkmar Müller
Cancers 2020, 12(10), 2787; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102787 - 28 Sep 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2841
Abstract
Background: Brain metastases (BM) have become a major challenge in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The aim of this analysis was to characterize patients with asymptomatic BM (n = 580) in the overall cohort of 2589 patients with BM [...] Read more.
Background: Brain metastases (BM) have become a major challenge in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The aim of this analysis was to characterize patients with asymptomatic BM (n = 580) in the overall cohort of 2589 patients with BM from our Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Network Germany (BMBC) registry. Results: Compared to symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients were slightly younger at diagnosis (median age: 55.5 vs. 57.0 years, p = 0.01), had a better performance status at diagnosis (Karnofsky index 80–100%: 68.4% vs. 57%, p < 0.001), a lower number of BM (>1 BM: 56% vs. 70%, p = 0.027), and a slightly smaller diameter of BM (median: 1.5 vs. 2.2 cm, p < 0.001). Asymptomatic patients were more likely to have extracranial metastases (86.7% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.003) but were less likely to have leptomeningeal metastasis (6.3% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001). Asymptomatic patients underwent less intensive BM therapy but had a longer median overall survival (statistically significant for a cohort of HER2-positive patients) compared to symptomatic patients (10.4 vs. 6.9 months, p < 0.001). Conclusions: These analyses show a trend that asymptomatic patients have less severe metastatic brain disease and despite less intensive local BM therapy still have a better outcome (statistically significant for a cohort of HER2-positive patients) than patients who present with symptomatic BM, although a lead time bias of the earlier diagnosis cannot be ruled out. Our analysis is of clinical relevance in the context of potential trials examining the benefit of early detection and treatment of BM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research, Other

25 pages, 1042 KiB  
Review
Anti-Hormonal Therapy in Breast Cancer and Its Effect on the Blood-Brain Barrier
by Carolin J. Curtaz, Ludwig Kiesel, Patrick Meybohm, Achim Wöckel and Malgorzata Burek
Cancers 2022, 14(20), 5132; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14205132 - 19 Oct 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2973
Abstract
The molecular receptor status of breast cancer has implications for prognosis and long-term metastasis. Although metastatic luminal B-like, hormone-receptor-positive, HER2−negative, breast cancer causes brain metastases less frequently than other subtypes, though tumor metastases in the brain are increasingly being detected of this patient [...] Read more.
The molecular receptor status of breast cancer has implications for prognosis and long-term metastasis. Although metastatic luminal B-like, hormone-receptor-positive, HER2−negative, breast cancer causes brain metastases less frequently than other subtypes, though tumor metastases in the brain are increasingly being detected of this patient group. Despite the many years of tried and tested use of a wide variety of anti-hormonal therapeutic agents, there is insufficient data on their intracerebral effectiveness and their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. In this review, we therefore summarize the current state of knowledge on anti-hormonal therapy and its intracerebral impact and effects on the blood-brain barrier in breast cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1129 KiB  
Review
Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Brain Metastases in HER2-Positive and Triple Negative Breast Cancers
by Sarah Bryan, Isabell Witzel, Kerstin Borgmann and Leticia Oliveira-Ferrer
Cancers 2021, 13(16), 4137; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164137 - 17 Aug 2021
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 3590
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cause of cancer-associated death for women worldwide, with deaths commonly resulting from metastatic spread to distant organs. Approximately 30% of metastatic BC patients develop brain metastases (BM), a currently incurable diagnosis. The influence of BC molecular [...] Read more.
Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cause of cancer-associated death for women worldwide, with deaths commonly resulting from metastatic spread to distant organs. Approximately 30% of metastatic BC patients develop brain metastases (BM), a currently incurable diagnosis. The influence of BC molecular subtype and gene expression on breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) development and patient prognosis is undeniable and is, therefore, an important focus point in the attempt to combat the disease. The HER2-positive and triple-negative molecular subtypes are associated with an increased risk of developing BCBM. Several genetic and molecular mechanisms linked to HER2-positive and triple-negative BC breast cancers appear to influence BCBM formation on several levels, including increased development of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), enhanced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and migration of primary BC cells to the brain and/or through superior local invasiveness aided by cancer stem-like cells (CSCs). These specific BC characteristics, together with the ensuing developments at a clinical level, are presented in this review article, drawing a connection between research findings and related therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing BCBM formation and/or progression. Furthermore, we briefly address the critical limitations in our current understanding of this complex topic, highlighting potential focal points for future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 339 KiB  
Review
Brain Metastases in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Current and Novel Treatment Strategies
by Alejandro Garcia-Alvarez, Andri Papakonstantinou and Mafalda Oliveira
Cancers 2021, 13(12), 2927; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13122927 - 11 Jun 2021
Cited by 56 | Viewed by 6747
Abstract
Development of brain metastases can occur in up to 30–50% of patients with breast cancer, representing a significant impact on an individual patient in terms of survival and quality of life. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have an increased risk of developing brain [...] Read more.
Development of brain metastases can occur in up to 30–50% of patients with breast cancer, representing a significant impact on an individual patient in terms of survival and quality of life. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have an increased risk of developing brain metastases; however, screening for brain metastases is not currently recommended due to the lack of robust evidence to support survival benefit. In recent years, several novel anti-HER2 agents have led to significant improvements in the outcomes of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Despite these advances, brain and leptomeningeal metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, and their optimal management remains an unmet need. This review presents an update on the current and novel treatment strategies for patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer and discusses the open questions in the field. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer)

Other

16 pages, 9580 KiB  
Systematic Review
Comparative Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Antibody–Drug Conjugates in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
by Yan Wang, Hangcheng Xu, Yiqun Han, Yun Wu and Jiayu Wang
Cancers 2022, 14(14), 3372; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14143372 - 11 Jul 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2831
Abstract
HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is an important clinical problem. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), two categories of emerging agents in this field. We implemented a [...] Read more.
HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is an important clinical problem. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), two categories of emerging agents in this field. We implemented a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and abstracts of oncology conferences. A network meta-analysis following Bayesian approaches was performed. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated to estimate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) disease progression. Sixteen studies were included. Pairwise comparisons of PFS showed salient divergency between T-DXd and the physician’s choice of treatment (HR 0.17; 95% CrI 0.03–0.82) or afatinib (HR 0.14; 95% CrI 0.02–1.00). T-DXd and T-DM1 ranked first regarding PFS and OS, respectively, followed by TKI-containing regimens. The incidence of CNS disease progression was analyzed separately according to baseline BCBM status, among which neratinib-containing regimens were most likely to rank the best. In conclusion, ADCs including T-DXd and T-DM1 showed better efficacy than TKIs in the survival outcomes for HER2-positive BCBM patients. Treatments based on neratinib or T-DM1 revealed favorable results in reducing the recurrent rate of CNS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop