Updates on Urologic Oncology: From Diagnosis to Localized and Systemic Therapy Options

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2024 | Viewed by 3111

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Interests: urinary bladder neoplasms
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Urological malignancies are one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. The early and accurate diagnosis of these neoplasms can enable the more effective and personalized management of the affected patients. Liquid biopsy is adopting an increasingly prominent role in the diagnosis and prognosis of bladder and prostate cancer. New prognostic biomarkers are currently being studied in the context of renal cancer management. Moreover, the new minimally invasive surgical technologies enable the constant improvement of patients’ oncological and functional outcomes, just as immunotherapy represents a significant advance in the evolution of the treatment of major urological neoplasms, both localized and locally advanced. The purpose of this Special Issue is to summarize the latest innovations in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of urological neoplasms and the future perspectives that may be derived from current research.

Dr. Giuseppe Palermo
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • bladder cancer
  • prostate cancer
  • renal cancer
  • urologic cancer treatment
  • urologic cancer diagnosis
  • urologic cancer innovation
  • urologic neoplasm therapy
  • immunotherapy

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 529 KiB  
Article
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with the Novel Surgical Robotic Platform Hugo™ RAS: Monocentric First Series of 132 Cases Reporting Surgical, and Early Functional and Oncological Outcomes at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center
by Angelo Totaro, Eros Scarciglia, Filippo Marino, Marco Campetella, Carlo Gandi, Mauro Ragonese, Riccardo Bientinesi, Giuseppe Palermo, Francesco Pio Bizzarri, Antonio Cretì, Simona Presutti, Andrea Russo, Paola Aceto, Pierfrancesco Bassi, Francesco Pierconti, Marco Racioppi and Emilio Sacco
Cancers 2024, 16(8), 1602; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081602 - 22 Apr 2024
Viewed by 299
Abstract
Background: Robotic-assisted surgery is the gold standard for performing radical prostatectomy (RARP), with new robotic devices such as HugoTM RAS gaining prominence worldwide. Objective: We report the surgical, perioperative, and early postoperative outcomes of RARP using HugoTM RAS. Design, setting, and [...] Read more.
Background: Robotic-assisted surgery is the gold standard for performing radical prostatectomy (RARP), with new robotic devices such as HugoTM RAS gaining prominence worldwide. Objective: We report the surgical, perioperative, and early postoperative outcomes of RARP using HugoTM RAS. Design, setting, and participants: Between April 2022 and October 2023, we performed 132 procedures using the Montsouris technique with a four-robotic-arm configuration in patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa). Outcome measures: We collected intraoperative and perioperative data during hospitalization, along with follow-up data at predefined postoperative intervals of 3 and 6 months. Results and limitations: Lymphadenectomy was performed in 25 procedures, with a bilateral nerve-sparing technique in 33 and a monolateral nerve-sparing technique in 33 cases. The mean total surgery time was 242 (±57) min, the mean console time was 124 (±48) min, and the mean docking time was 10 (±2) min. We identified 17 system errors related to robotic arm failures, 9 robotic instrument breakdowns, and 8 significant conflicts between robotic arms. One post-operative complication was classified as Clavien–Dindo 3b. None of the adverse events, whether singular or combined, increased the operative time. Positive margins (pR1) were found in 54 (40.9%) histological specimens, 37 (28.0%) of which were clinically significant. At 3 and 6 months post-surgery, the PSA levels were undetectable in 94.6% and 92.1% of patients, respectively. Social urinary continence was regained in 86% after 6 months. Limitations of our study include its observational monocentric case-series design and the short follow-up data for functional and oncological outcomes. Conclusions: Our initial experience highlights the reliability of the HugoTM RAS system in performing RARP. Additionally, we also list problems and solutions found in our daily work. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1430 KiB  
Article
Comparison of PIV and Other Immune Inflammation Markers of Oncological and Survival Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy
by Pierluigi Russo, Giuseppe Palermo, Roberto Iacovelli, Mauro Ragonese, Chiara Ciccarese, Giuseppe Maioriello, Fabrizio Fantasia, Francesco Pio Bizzarri, Filippo Marino, Koosha Moosavi, Domenico Nigro, Giovanni Battista Filomena, Filippo Gavi, Francesco Rossi, Francesco Pinto, Marco Racioppi and Nazario Foschi
Cancers 2024, 16(3), 651; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030651 - 03 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 919
Abstract
Inflammation is widely acknowledged as a significant characteristic of cancer, playing a substantial function in both the initiation and advancement of cancers. In this research, we planned to compare pan-immune inflammation markers and other well-known markers (systemic immune inflammation index and neutrophil to [...] Read more.
Inflammation is widely acknowledged as a significant characteristic of cancer, playing a substantial function in both the initiation and advancement of cancers. In this research, we planned to compare pan-immune inflammation markers and other well-known markers (systemic immune inflammation index and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio) to predict prognosis in individuals treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we focused on preoperative PIV, systemic immune inflammation index (SII), and neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in 193 individuals managed with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer between January 2016 and November 2022. Multivariable logistic regression assessments were performed to assess the predictive capabilities of PIV, SII, and NLR for infiltration of lymph nodes (N), aggressive tumor stage (pT3/pT4), and any non-organ limited disease at the time of RC. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess the predictive impact of PIV on Relapse-free survival (RFS), Cancer-specific survival (CSS), and Overall survival (OS). Results: Our individuals were divided into high PIV and low PIV cohorts using the optimal cut-off value (340.96 × 109/L) based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for relapse-free survival. In multivariable preoperative logistic regression models, only SII and PIV correlated with the infiltration of lymph nodes, aggressive disease, and any non-organ confined disease. In multivariable Cox regression models considering presurgical clinicopathological variables, a higher PIV was associated with diminished RFS (p = 0.017) and OS (p = 0.029). In addition, in multivariable Cox regression models for postoperative outcomes, a high PIV correlated with both RFS (p = 0.034) and OS (p = 0.048). Conclusions: Our study suggests that PIV and SII are two very similar markers that may serve as independent and significant predictors of aggressive disease and worse survival impacts on individuals undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder neoplasm. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5370 KiB  
Article
Alterations in the Epigenetic Machinery Associated with Prostate Cancer Health Disparities
by Jenna Craddock, Jue Jiang, Sean M. Patrick, Shingai B. A. Mutambirwa, Phillip D. Stricker, M. S. Riana Bornman, Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri and Vanessa M. Hayes
Cancers 2023, 15(13), 3462; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133462 - 01 Jul 2023
Viewed by 1352
Abstract
Prostate cancer is driven by acquired genetic alterations, including those impacting the epigenetic machinery. With African ancestry as a significant risk factor for aggressive disease, we hypothesize that dysregulation among the roughly 656 epigenetic genes may contribute to prostate cancer health disparities. Investigating [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer is driven by acquired genetic alterations, including those impacting the epigenetic machinery. With African ancestry as a significant risk factor for aggressive disease, we hypothesize that dysregulation among the roughly 656 epigenetic genes may contribute to prostate cancer health disparities. Investigating prostate tumor genomic data from 109 men of southern African and 56 men of European Australian ancestry, we found that African-derived tumors present with a longer tail of epigenetic driver gene candidates (72 versus 10). Biased towards African-specific drivers (63 versus 9 shared), many are novel to prostate cancer (18/63), including several putative therapeutic targets (CHD7, DPF3, POLR1B, SETD1B, UBTF, and VPS72). Through clustering of all variant types and copy number alterations, we describe two epigenetic PCa taxonomies capable of differentiating patients by ancestry and predicted clinical outcomes. We identified the top genes in African- and European-derived tumors representing a multifunctional “generic machinery”, the alteration of which may be instrumental in epigenetic dysregulation and prostate tumorigenesis. In conclusion, numerous somatic alterations in the epigenetic machinery drive prostate carcinogenesis, but African-derived tumors appear to achieve this state with greater diversity among such alterations. The greater novelty observed in African-derived tumors illustrates the significant clinical benefit to be derived from a much needed African-tailored approach to prostate cancer healthcare aimed at reducing prostate cancer health disparities. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop