Developments in the Management of Gastrointestinal Malignancies

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 March 2025 | Viewed by 3587

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Surgical Oncology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Interests: hepatocellular carcinoma; gastrointestinal malignancies; cancer metastasis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Treatment of these malignancies often consists of multimodal therapy with a combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. In addition, immune-based therapies are being utilized at increased rates in patients with GI malignancies.

In this Special Issue, we focus on advances in the multimodal treatment of patients with GI malignancies, including patients with localized and metastatic disease. Comments are encouraged on the role of biomarkers and molecular profiling techniques to help guide therapeutic decisions as well as emerging novel therapies.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Zachary J. Brown
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • gastrointestinal malignancies
  • multimodal therapy
  • chemotherapy
  • radiotherapy
  • immunotherapy
  • localized and metastatic

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

14 pages, 2546 KiB  
Article
Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Resectable Gastric Cancer: Analysis from a Western Academic Center
by Elliott J. Yee, Danielle Gilbert, Jeffrey Kaplan, Sachin Wani, Sunnie S. Kim, Martin D. McCarter and Camille L. Stewart
Cancers 2024, 16(7), 1428; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16071428 - 07 Apr 2024
Viewed by 722
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are an emerging biomarker predictive of response to immunotherapy across a spectrum of solid organ malignancies. The characterization of TILs in gastric cancer (GC) treated with contemporary, multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is understudied. In this retrospective investigation, we analyzed the [...] Read more.
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are an emerging biomarker predictive of response to immunotherapy across a spectrum of solid organ malignancies. The characterization of TILs in gastric cancer (GC) treated with contemporary, multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is understudied. In this retrospective investigation, we analyzed the degree of infiltration, phenotype, and spatial distribution of TILs via immunohistochemistry within resected GC specimens treated with or without NAC at a Western center. We hypothesized that NAC executes immunostimulatory roles, as evidenced by an increased number of anti-tumor TILs in the tumor microenvironment. We found significantly elevated levels of conventional and memory CD8+ T cells, as well as total TILs (CD4+, CD8+, Treg, B cells), within chemotherapy-treated tumors compared with chemotherapy-naïve specimens. We also revealed important associations between survival and pathologic responses with enhanced TIL infiltration. Taken together, our findings advocate for an immunostimulatory role of chemotherapy and underscore the potential synergistic effect of combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy in resectable gastric cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Developments in the Management of Gastrointestinal Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2987 KiB  
Article
HER2 and PD-L1 Expression in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Insights for Combinatorial Targeting Approaches
by Marta Baptista Freitas, Irene Gullo, Dina Leitão, Lúcia Águas, Carla Oliveira, António Polónia, Joana Gomes, Fátima Carneiro, Celso Albuquerque Reis and Henrique Oliveira Duarte
Cancers 2024, 16(6), 1227; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16061227 - 20 Mar 2024
Viewed by 691
Abstract
Gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (GA/GEJA) are associated with a poor prognosis, primarily due to late disease diagnosis. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression are important biomarkers for treatment selection in locally advanced unresectable and [...] Read more.
Gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (GA/GEJA) are associated with a poor prognosis, primarily due to late disease diagnosis. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression are important biomarkers for treatment selection in locally advanced unresectable and metastatic GA/GEJA, and there is increasing interest in their role in earlier stages of disease. In this study, we aimed to evaluate HER2 and PD-L1 expression in a curative-intent GA/GEJA cohort to describe their expression patterns and analyze the association between HER2 expression and clinicopathological features. HER2 expression was evaluated in surgical and endoscopic submucosal dissection tumor samples, and PD-L1 was evaluated in HER2-positive cases. The clinical cohort included 107 patients, with 8.4% testing positive for HER2 (seven of whom also exhibited a PD-L1 combined positive score of ≥1. HER2 status was not significantly associated with survival outcomes. A pathologist-guided, region-specific analysis revealed that PD-L1 expression rarely overlaps with HER2-positive tumor areas. While the therapeutic implications of these observations remain unknown, these findings suggest that combination strategies targeting HER2 and PD-L1 might be directed toward distinct tumor subclones. The herein disclosed region-specific biomarker expression patterns may have important therapeutic and prognostic impacts, warranting further evaluation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Developments in the Management of Gastrointestinal Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 447 KiB  
Article
Preoperative Chronic Inflammation Is a Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications Independent of Body Composition in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy
by Ryota Matsui, Noriyuki Inaki, Toshikatsu Tsuji and Tetsu Fukunaga
Cancers 2024, 16(4), 833; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040833 - 19 Feb 2024
Viewed by 612
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between preoperative inflammation and postoperative complications in gastric cancer patients having elective gastrectomy. Participants in this study were those who underwent radical gastrectomy between April 2008 and June 2018 and were diagnosed with [...] Read more.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between preoperative inflammation and postoperative complications in gastric cancer patients having elective gastrectomy. Participants in this study were those who underwent radical gastrectomy between April 2008 and June 2018 and were diagnosed with stage I–III primary gastric cancer. Preoperative CRP values were used to divide the patients into two groups: the inflammation group comprised individuals having a CRP level of ≥0.5 mg/dL; the other was the non-inflammation group. The primary outcome was overall complications of Clavien–Dindo grade II or higher after surgery. Using propensity score matching to adjust for background, we compared the postoperative outcomes of the groups and conducted a multivariate analysis to identify risk variables for complications. Of 951 patients, 852 (89.6%) were in the non-inflammation group and 99 (10.4%) were in the inflammation group. After matching, both groups included 99 patients, and no significant differences in patient characteristics were observed between both groups. The inflammation group had a significantly greater total number of postoperative complications (p = 0.019). The multivariate analysis revealed that a preoperative CRP level of ≥0.5 mg/dL was an independent risk factor for total postoperative complications in all patients (odds ratio: 2.310, 95% confidence interval: 1.430–3.730, p < 0.001). In conclusion, in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer, preoperative inflammation has been found to be an independent risk factor for overall complications after surgery. Patients with chronic inflammation require preoperative treatment to reduce inflammation because chronic inflammation is the greatest risk factor for postoperative complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Developments in the Management of Gastrointestinal Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

13 pages, 1286 KiB  
Review
Autoimmune Atrophic Gastritis: A Clinical Review
by Chiara Castellana, Leonardo Henry Eusebi, Elton Dajti, Veronica Iascone, Amanda Vestito, Pietro Fusaroli, Lorenzo Fuccio, Antonietta D’Errico and Rocco Maurizio Zagari
Cancers 2024, 16(7), 1310; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16071310 - 28 Mar 2024
Viewed by 789
Abstract
Autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) is a chronic condition characterized by the presence of atrophy in the oxyntic mucosa due to anti-parietal cell antibodies. This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of autoimmune atrophic gastritis, reporting recent evidence on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical [...] Read more.
Autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) is a chronic condition characterized by the presence of atrophy in the oxyntic mucosa due to anti-parietal cell antibodies. This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of autoimmune atrophic gastritis, reporting recent evidence on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical presentation, risk of malignancies, and management. The prevalence of AAG has been estimated at between 0.3% and 2.7% in the general population. The diagnosis of AAG is based on a combination of the serologic profile and the histological examination of gastric biopsies. Patients with AAG are often asymptomatic but can also have dyspeptic or reflux symptoms. The atrophy of the oxyntic mucosa leads to iron and vitamin B12 malabsorption, which may result in anemia and neurological affections. Autoimmune atrophic gastritis is associated with an increased risk of type I neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and gastric cancer, with an incidence rate of 2.8% and 0.5% per person/year, respectively. Management is directed to reinstate vitamins and iron and to prevent malignancies with endoscopic surveillance. In conclusion, atrophic autoimmune gastritis is an infrequent condition, often asymptomatic and misdiagnosed, that requires an early diagnosis for appropriate vitamin supplementation and endoscopic follow-up for the early diagnosis of NETs and gastric cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Developments in the Management of Gastrointestinal Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

11 pages, 682 KiB  
Systematic Review
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Liver Resections for Colorectal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Kamil Safiejko, Michal Pedziwiatr, Michal Pruc, Radoslaw Tarkowski, Marcin Juchimiuk, Marian Domurat, Jacek Smereka, Khikmat Anvarov, Przemyslaw Sielicki, Krzysztof Kurek and Lukasz Szarpak
Cancers 2024, 16(8), 1596; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081596 - 22 Apr 2024
Viewed by 309
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and the liver is the most common localization of metastatic disease. The incidence of minimally invasive liver surgery is increasing, and robotic surgery (RLR) is believed to overcome some limitations of a laparoscopic approach [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and the liver is the most common localization of metastatic disease. The incidence of minimally invasive liver surgery is increasing, and robotic surgery (RLR) is believed to overcome some limitations of a laparoscopic approach (LRL). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of the laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. An online search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases was performed. Eight studies involving 3210 patients were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. In the LRL group, a higher conversion to open rate (12.4%) was observed compared to the RLR (6.7%; p = <0.001). 30-day mortality was 0.7% for the LRL group compared to 0.5% for the RLR group (p = 0.76). Mortality in longer periods among LLR and RLR amounted to 18.2% vs. 8.0% for 1-year mortality (p = 0.07), 34.1% vs. 26.7% for 2-year mortality (p = 0.13), and 52.3% vs. 48.3% for 3-year mortality (p = 0.46). The length of hospital stay was 5.6 ± 2.5 vs. 5.8 ± 2.1 days, respectively (p = 0.47). There were no significant differences between the incidence of individual complications in the LRL and RLR groups (p = 0.78). Laparoscopic or robotic approaches for colorectal liver metastases are comparable in terms of safety and effectiveness. There are significant advantages to robotic surgery, although there is still no long-term evidence concerning overall survival, and the number of patients operated on using RLR remains small. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Developments in the Management of Gastrointestinal Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop