Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function

A special issue of Biomolecules (ISSN 2218-273X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (18 April 2020) | Viewed by 99954

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Interests: posttranscriptional gene regulation; mRNA translation; tRNA; RNA granules; non-canonical nucleic acid structures
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Interests: mRNA processing; mRNA turnover; RNA-binding proteins; posttranscriptional regulation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

RNPs (ribonucleoprotein particles) are complexes formed between RNA (including protein-coding mRNAs and non-protein-coding RNAs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). RNPs play key roles in a large number of diverse cellular processes, which take place in different subcellular compartments. Traditionally, RNPs are thought to be formed by physical interactions between RNA and RBPs that bear well conserved RNA-binding domains. However, recent analyses identified a large number of non-conventional RNA-binding sequences with no apparent structural domains. The interest in structural and functional studies of RNPs is further increasing due to their proposed role in the pathogenesis of human diseases and as novel therapeutic targets.

This Special Issue intends to bring together specialists to cover different aspects of biology of RNPs. We welcome both original papers and up-to-date reviews that cover but are not limited to the following topics:

  • Principles of assembly and disassembly of ribonucleoprotein complexes;
  • Structural aspects of RNPs, structural roles of individual RBPs and their structural domains;
  • Molecular mechanisms of RNPs in gene regulation from transcription to RNA translation, decay, and localization;
  • Inter-connection between RNP-mediated processes, principles of their regulation;
  • Global-scale analysis RBPs, molecular mechanisms, and functional consequences of their assembly into high-molecular complexes such as RNA granules;
  • Connection of RBPs to human diseases.

Assist. Prof. Pavel Ivanov
Prof. Niels H. Gehring
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Biomolecules is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • RNA
  • RNA-protein complexes
  • RNA-binding proteins
  • Regulation of gene expression
  • RNA granules
  • RNA processing
  • mRNA translation.

Published Papers (14 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

19 pages, 3510 KiB  
Article
Stress Granule Assembly Can Facilitate but Is Not Required for TDP-43 Cytoplasmic Aggregation
by Nikita Fernandes, Luke Nero, Shawn M. Lyons, Pavel Ivanov, Telsa M. Mittelmeier, Timothy A. Bolger and J. Ross Buchan
Biomolecules 2020, 10(10), 1367; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10101367 - 25 Sep 2020
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 5380 | Correction
Abstract
Stress granules (SGs) are hypothesized to facilitate TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) cytoplasmic mislocalization and aggregation, which may underly amyotrophic lateral sclerosis pathology. However, much data for this hypothesis is indirect. Additionally, whether P-bodies (PBs; related mRNA-protein granules) affect TDP-43 phenotypes is unclear. [...] Read more.
Stress granules (SGs) are hypothesized to facilitate TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) cytoplasmic mislocalization and aggregation, which may underly amyotrophic lateral sclerosis pathology. However, much data for this hypothesis is indirect. Additionally, whether P-bodies (PBs; related mRNA-protein granules) affect TDP-43 phenotypes is unclear. Here, we determine that induction of TDP-43 expression in yeast results in the accumulation of SG-like foci that in >90% of cases become the sites where TDP-43 cytoplasmic foci first appear. Later, TDP-43 foci associate less with SGs and more with PBs, though independent TDP-43 foci also accumulate. However, depleting or over-expressing yeast SG and PB proteins reveals no consistent trend between SG or PB assembly and TDP-43 foci formation, toxicity or protein abundance. In human cells, immunostaining endogenous TDP-43 with different TDP-43 antibodies reveals distinct localization and aggregation behaviors. Following acute arsenite stress, all phospho-TDP-43 foci colocalize with SGs. Finally, formation of TDP-43 cytoplasmic foci following low-dose chronic arsenite stress is impaired, but not completely blocked, in G3BP1/2ΔΔ cells. Collectively, our data suggest that SG and PB assembly may facilitate TDP-43 cytoplasmic localization and aggregation but are likely not essential for these events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1708 KiB  
Article
CTELS: A Cell-Free System for the Analysis of Translation Termination Rate
by Kseniya A. Lashkevich, Valeriya I. Shlyk, Artem S. Kushchenko, Vadim N. Gladyshev, Elena Z. Alkalaeva and Sergey E. Dmitriev
Biomolecules 2020, 10(6), 911; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10060911 - 16 Jun 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4304
Abstract
Translation termination is the final step in protein biosynthesis when the synthesized polypeptide is released from the ribosome. Understanding this complex process is important for treatment of many human disorders caused by nonsense mutations in important genes. Here, we present a new method [...] Read more.
Translation termination is the final step in protein biosynthesis when the synthesized polypeptide is released from the ribosome. Understanding this complex process is important for treatment of many human disorders caused by nonsense mutations in important genes. Here, we present a new method for the analysis of translation termination rate in cell-free systems, CTELS (for C-terminally extended luciferase-based system). This approach was based on a continuously measured luciferase activity during in vitro translation reaction of two reporter mRNA, one of which encodes a C-terminally extended luciferase. This extension occupies a ribosomal polypeptide tunnel and lets the completely synthesized enzyme be active before translation termination occurs, i.e., when it is still on the ribosome. In contrast, luciferase molecule without the extension emits light only after its release. Comparing the translation dynamics of these two reporters allows visualization of a delay corresponding to the translation termination event. We demonstrated applicability of this approach for investigating the effects of cis- and trans-acting components, including small molecule inhibitors and read-through inducing sequences, on the translation termination rate. With CTELS, we systematically assessed negative effects of decreased 3′ UTR length, specifically on termination. We also showed that blasticidin S implements its inhibitory effect on eukaryotic translation system, mostly by affecting elongation, and that an excess of eRF1 termination factor (both the wild-type and a non-catalytic AGQ mutant) can interfere with elongation. Analysis of read-through mechanics with CTELS revealed a transient stalling event at a “leaky” stop codon context, which likely defines the basis of nonsense suppression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1727 KiB  
Article
Crystal Structure of a Variant PAM2 Motif of LARP4B Bound to the MLLE Domain of PABPC1
by Clemens Grimm, Jann-Patrick Pelz, Cornelius Schneider, Katrin Schäffler and Utz Fischer
Biomolecules 2020, 10(6), 872; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10060872 - 06 Jun 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3279
Abstract
Eukaryotic cells determine the protein output of their genetic program by regulating mRNA transcription, localization, translation and turnover rates. This regulation is accomplished by an ensemble of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that bind to any given mRNA, thus forming mRNPs. Poly(A) binding proteins (PABPs) [...] Read more.
Eukaryotic cells determine the protein output of their genetic program by regulating mRNA transcription, localization, translation and turnover rates. This regulation is accomplished by an ensemble of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that bind to any given mRNA, thus forming mRNPs. Poly(A) binding proteins (PABPs) are prominent members of virtually all mRNPs that possess poly(A) tails. They serve as multifunctional scaffolds, allowing the recruitment of diverse factors containing a poly(A)-interacting motif (PAM) into mRNPs. We present the crystal structure of the variant PAM motif (termed PAM2w) in the N-terminal part of the positive translation factor LARP4B, which binds to the MLLE domain of the poly(A) binding protein C1 cytoplasmic 1 (PABPC1). The structural analysis, along with mutational studies in vitro and in vivo, uncovered a new mode of interaction between PAM2 motifs and MLLE domains. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3351 KiB  
Article
Discovering the RNA-Binding Proteome of Plant Leaves with an Improved RNA Interactome Capture Method
by Marcel Bach-Pages, Felix Homma, Jiorgos Kourelis, Farnusch Kaschani, Shabaz Mohammed, Markus Kaiser, Renier A. L. van der Hoorn, Alfredo Castello and Gail M. Preston
Biomolecules 2020, 10(4), 661; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10040661 - 24 Apr 2020
Cited by 55 | Viewed by 14123
Abstract
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play a crucial role in regulating RNA function and fate. However, the full complement of RBPs has only recently begun to be uncovered through proteome-wide approaches such as RNA interactome capture (RIC). RIC has been applied to various cell lines [...] Read more.
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play a crucial role in regulating RNA function and fate. However, the full complement of RBPs has only recently begun to be uncovered through proteome-wide approaches such as RNA interactome capture (RIC). RIC has been applied to various cell lines and organisms, including plants, greatly expanding the repertoire of RBPs. However, several technical challenges have limited the efficacy of RIC when applied to plant tissues. Here, we report an improved version of RIC that overcomes the difficulties imposed by leaf tissue. Using this improved RIC method in Arabidopsis leaves, we identified 717 RBPs, generating a deep RNA-binding proteome for leaf tissues. While 75% of these RBPs can be linked to RNA biology, the remaining 25% were previously not known to interact with RNA. Interestingly, we observed that a large number of proteins related to photosynthesis associate with RNA in vivo, including proteins from the four major photosynthetic supercomplexes. As has previously been reported for mammals, a large proportion of leaf RBPs lack known RNA-binding domains, suggesting unconventional modes of RNA binding. We anticipate that this improved RIC method will provide critical insights into RNA metabolism in plants, including how cellular RBPs respond to environmental, physiological and pathological cues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 4836 KiB  
Article
Human vtRNA1-1 Levels Modulate Signaling Pathways and Regulate Apoptosis in Human Cancer Cells
by Lisamaria Bracher, Iolanda Ferro, Carlos Pulido-Quetglas, Marc-David Ruepp, Rory Johnson and Norbert Polacek
Biomolecules 2020, 10(4), 614; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10040614 - 16 Apr 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3986
Abstract
Regulatory non-protein coding RNAs perform a remarkable variety of complex biological functions. Previously, we demonstrated a role of the human non-coding vault RNA1-1 (vtRNA1-1) in inhibiting intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis in several cancer cell lines. Yet on the molecular level, the function of [...] Read more.
Regulatory non-protein coding RNAs perform a remarkable variety of complex biological functions. Previously, we demonstrated a role of the human non-coding vault RNA1-1 (vtRNA1-1) in inhibiting intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis in several cancer cell lines. Yet on the molecular level, the function of the vtRNA1-1 is still not fully clear. Here, we created HeLa knock-out cell lines revealing that prolonged starvation triggers elevated levels of apoptosis in the absence of vtRNA1-1 but not in vtRNA1-3 knock-out cells. Next-generation deep sequencing of the mRNome identified the PI3K/Akt pathway and the ERK1/2 MAPK cascade, two prominent signaling axes, to be misregulated in the absence of vtRNA1-1 during starvation-mediated cell death conditions. Expression of vtRNA1-1 mutants identified a short stretch of 24 nucleotides of the vtRNA1-1 central domain as being essential for successful maintenance of apoptosis resistance. This study describes a cell signaling-dependent contribution of the human vtRNA1-1 to starvation-induced programmed cell death. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

32 pages, 2618 KiB  
Review
Dynamic mRNP Remodeling in Response to Internal and External Stimuli
by Kathi Zarnack, Sureshkumar Balasubramanian, Michael P. Gantier, Vladislav Kunetsky, Michael Kracht, M. Lienhard Schmitz and Katja Sträßer
Biomolecules 2020, 10(9), 1310; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10091310 - 11 Sep 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5175
Abstract
Signal transduction and the regulation of gene expression are fundamental processes in every cell. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play a key role in the post-transcriptional modulation of gene expression in response to both internal and external stimuli. However, how signaling pathways regulate the assembly [...] Read more.
Signal transduction and the regulation of gene expression are fundamental processes in every cell. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play a key role in the post-transcriptional modulation of gene expression in response to both internal and external stimuli. However, how signaling pathways regulate the assembly of RBPs with mRNAs remains largely unknown. Here, we summarize observations showing that the formation and composition of messenger ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs) is dynamically remodeled in space and time by specific signaling cascades and the resulting post-translational modifications. The integration of signaling events with gene expression is key to the rapid adaptation of cells to environmental changes and stress. Only a combined approach analyzing the signal transduction pathways and the changes in post-transcriptional gene expression they cause will unravel the mechanisms coordinating these important cellular processes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 2410 KiB  
Review
Single and Combined Methods to Specifically or Bulk-Purify RNA–Protein Complexes
by Roosje Van Ende, Sam Balzarini and Koen Geuten
Biomolecules 2020, 10(8), 1160; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10081160 - 07 Aug 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4797
Abstract
The ribonome interconnects the proteome and the transcriptome. Specific biology is situated at this interface, which can be studied in bulk using omics approaches or specifically by targeting an individual protein or RNA species. In this review, we focus on both RNA- and [...] Read more.
The ribonome interconnects the proteome and the transcriptome. Specific biology is situated at this interface, which can be studied in bulk using omics approaches or specifically by targeting an individual protein or RNA species. In this review, we focus on both RNA- and ribonucleoprotein-(RNP) centric methods. These methods can be used to study the dynamics of the ribonome in response to a stimulus or to identify the proteins that interact with a specific RNA species. The purpose of this review is to provide and discuss an overview of strategies to cross-link RNA to proteins and the currently available RNA- and RNP-centric approaches to study RNPs. We elaborate on some major challenges common to most methods, involving RNP yield, purity and experimental cost. We identify the origin of these difficulties and propose to combine existing approaches to overcome these challenges. The solutions provided build on the recently developed organic phase separation protocols, such as Cross-Linked RNA eXtraction (XRNAX), orthogonal organic phase separation (OOPS) and Phenol-Toluol extraction (PTex). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 1376 KiB  
Review
UPF1-Mediated RNA Decay—Danse Macabre in a Cloud
by Daria Lavysh and Gabriele Neu-Yilik
Biomolecules 2020, 10(7), 999; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10070999 - 04 Jul 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 5798
Abstract
Nonsense-mediated RNA decay (NMD) is the prototype example of a whole family of RNA decay pathways that unfold around a common central effector protein called UPF1. While NMD in yeast appears to be a linear pathway, NMD in higher eukaryotes is a multifaceted [...] Read more.
Nonsense-mediated RNA decay (NMD) is the prototype example of a whole family of RNA decay pathways that unfold around a common central effector protein called UPF1. While NMD in yeast appears to be a linear pathway, NMD in higher eukaryotes is a multifaceted phenomenon with high variability with respect to substrate RNAs, degradation efficiency, effector proteins and decay-triggering RNA features. Despite increasing knowledge of the mechanistic details, it seems ever more difficult to define NMD and to clearly distinguish it from a growing list of other UPF1-mediated RNA decay pathways (UMDs). With a focus on mammalian NMD, we here critically examine the prevailing NMD models and the gaps and inconsistencies in these models. By exploring the minimal requirements for NMD and other UMDs, we try to elucidate whether they are separate and definable pathways, or rather variations of the same phenomenon. Finally, we suggest that the operating principle of the UPF1-mediated decay family could be considered similar to that of a computing cloud providing a flexible infrastructure with rapid elasticity and dynamic access according to specific user needs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 1408 KiB  
Review
TOP mRNPs: Molecular Mechanisms and Principles of Regulation
by Eric Cockman, Paul Anderson and Pavel Ivanov
Biomolecules 2020, 10(7), 969; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10070969 - 27 Jun 2020
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 6280
Abstract
The cellular response to changes in the surrounding environment and to stress requires the coregulation of gene networks aiming to conserve energy and resources. This is often achieved by downregulating protein synthesis. The 5’ Terminal OligoPyrimidine (5’ TOP) motif-containing mRNAs, which encode proteins [...] Read more.
The cellular response to changes in the surrounding environment and to stress requires the coregulation of gene networks aiming to conserve energy and resources. This is often achieved by downregulating protein synthesis. The 5’ Terminal OligoPyrimidine (5’ TOP) motif-containing mRNAs, which encode proteins that are essential for protein synthesis, are the primary targets of translational control under stress. The TOP motif is a cis-regulatory RNA element that begins directly after the m7G cap structure and contains the hallmark invariant 5’-cytidine followed by an uninterrupted tract of 4–15 pyrimidines. Regulation of translation via the TOP motif coordinates global protein synthesis with simultaneous co-expression of the protein components required for ribosome biogenesis. In this review, we discuss architecture of TOP mRNA-containing ribonucleoprotein complexes, the principles of their assembly, and the modes of regulation of TOP mRNA translation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

43 pages, 3347 KiB  
Review
Emerging Roles of RNA 3′-end Cleavage and Polyadenylation in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapy of Human Disorders
by Jamie Nourse, Stefano Spada and Sven Danckwardt
Biomolecules 2020, 10(6), 915; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10060915 - 17 Jun 2020
Cited by 41 | Viewed by 8441
Abstract
A crucial feature of gene expression involves RNA processing to produce 3′ ends through a process termed 3′ end cleavage and polyadenylation (CPA). This ensures the nascent RNA molecule can exit the nucleus and be translated to ultimately give rise to a protein [...] Read more.
A crucial feature of gene expression involves RNA processing to produce 3′ ends through a process termed 3′ end cleavage and polyadenylation (CPA). This ensures the nascent RNA molecule can exit the nucleus and be translated to ultimately give rise to a protein which can execute a function. Further, alternative polyadenylation (APA) can produce distinct transcript isoforms, profoundly expanding the complexity of the transcriptome. CPA is carried out by multi-component protein complexes interacting with multiple RNA motifs and is tightly coupled to transcription, other steps of RNA processing, and even epigenetic modifications. CPA and APA contribute to the maintenance of a multitude of diverse physiological processes. It is therefore not surprising that disruptions of CPA and APA can lead to devastating disorders. Here, we review potential CPA and APA mechanisms involving both loss and gain of function that can have tremendous impacts on health and disease. Ultimately we highlight the emerging diagnostic and therapeutic potential CPA and APA offer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1692 KiB  
Review
Human Telomerase RNA: Telomerase Component or More?
by Maria Rubtsova and Olga Dontsova
Biomolecules 2020, 10(6), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10060873 - 06 Jun 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4926
Abstract
Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein complex that maintains the lengths of telomeres. Most studies of telomerase function have focused on the involvement of telomerase activation in the immortalization of cancer cells and cellular rejuvenation. However, some studies demonstrated that the results do not meet [...] Read more.
Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein complex that maintains the lengths of telomeres. Most studies of telomerase function have focused on the involvement of telomerase activation in the immortalization of cancer cells and cellular rejuvenation. However, some studies demonstrated that the results do not meet expectations for telomerase action in telomere maintenance. Recent results give reason to think that major telomerase components—the reverse transcriptase protein subunit and telomerase RNA—may participate in many cellular processes, including the regulation of apoptosis and autophagy, cell survival, pro-proliferative effects, regulation of gene expression, and protection against oxidative stress. However, the difficulties faced by scientist when researching telomerase component functions often reduce confidence in the minor effects observed in experiments. In this review, we focus on the analysis of the functions of telomerase components (paying more attention to the telomerase RNA component), both as a complex and as independent components, providing effects that are not associated with telomerase activity and telomere length maintenance. Despite the fact that the data on alternative roles of telomerase components look illusory, it would be wrong to completely reject the possibility of their involvement in other biological processes excluded from research/discussion. Investigations to improve the understanding of every aspect of the functioning of telomerase components will provide the basis for a more precise development of approaches to regulate cellular homeostasis, which is important for carcinogenesis and aging. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2724 KiB  
Review
A Day in the Life of the Exon Junction Complex
by Lena P. Schlautmann and Niels H. Gehring
Biomolecules 2020, 10(6), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10060866 - 05 Jun 2020
Cited by 48 | Viewed by 8451
Abstract
The exon junction complex (EJC) is an abundant messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) component that is assembled during splicing and binds to mRNAs upstream of exon-exon junctions. EJCs accompany the mRNA during its entire life in the nucleus and the cytoplasm and communicate the information [...] Read more.
The exon junction complex (EJC) is an abundant messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) component that is assembled during splicing and binds to mRNAs upstream of exon-exon junctions. EJCs accompany the mRNA during its entire life in the nucleus and the cytoplasm and communicate the information about the splicing process and the position of introns. Specifically, the EJC’s core components and its associated proteins regulate different steps of gene expression, including pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA export, translation, and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD). This review summarizes the most important functions and main protagonists in the life of the EJC. It also provides an overview of the latest findings on the assembly, composition and molecular activities of the EJC and presents them in the chronological order, in which they play a role in the EJC’s life cycle. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2707 KiB  
Review
snoRNPs: Functions in Ribosome Biogenesis
by Sandeep Ojha, Sulochan Malla and Shawn M. Lyons
Biomolecules 2020, 10(5), 783; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10050783 - 18 May 2020
Cited by 58 | Viewed by 8703
Abstract
Ribosomes are perhaps the most critical macromolecular machine as they are tasked with carrying out protein synthesis in cells. They are incredibly complex structures composed of protein components and heavily chemically modified RNAs. The task of assembling mature ribosomes from their component parts [...] Read more.
Ribosomes are perhaps the most critical macromolecular machine as they are tasked with carrying out protein synthesis in cells. They are incredibly complex structures composed of protein components and heavily chemically modified RNAs. The task of assembling mature ribosomes from their component parts consumes a massive amount of energy and requires greater than 200 assembly factors. Among the most critical of these are small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins (snoRNPs). These are small RNAs complexed with diverse sets of proteins. As suggested by their name, they localize to the nucleolus, the site of ribosome biogenesis. There, they facilitate multiple roles in ribosomes biogenesis, such as pseudouridylation and 2′-O-methylation of ribosomal (r)RNA, guiding pre-rRNA processing, and acting as molecular chaperones. Here, we reviewed their activity in promoting the assembly of ribosomes in eukaryotes with regards to chemical modification and pre-rRNA processing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 978 KiB  
Review
Y-Box Binding Proteins in mRNP Assembly, Translation, and Stability Control
by Daria Mordovkina, Dmitry N. Lyabin, Egor A. Smolin, Ekaterina M. Sogorina, Lev P. Ovchinnikov and Irina Eliseeva
Biomolecules 2020, 10(4), 591; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10040591 - 11 Apr 2020
Cited by 70 | Viewed by 5730
Abstract
Y-box binding proteins (YB proteins) are DNA/RNA-binding proteins belonging to a large family of proteins with the cold shock domain. Functionally, these proteins are known to be the most diverse, although the literature hardly offers any molecular mechanisms governing their activities in the [...] Read more.
Y-box binding proteins (YB proteins) are DNA/RNA-binding proteins belonging to a large family of proteins with the cold shock domain. Functionally, these proteins are known to be the most diverse, although the literature hardly offers any molecular mechanisms governing their activities in the cell, tissue, or the whole organism. This review describes the involvement of YB proteins in RNA-dependent processes, such as mRNA packaging into mRNPs, mRNA translation, and mRNA stabilization. In addition, recent data on the structural peculiarities of YB proteins underlying their interactions with nucleic acids are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ribonucleoprotein Particles (RNPs): From Structure to Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop