Previous Issue
Volume 2, March
 
 

Hardware, Volume 2, Issue 2 (June 2024) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 1368 KiB  
Review
Additively Manufactured Antennas and Electromagnetic Devices
by Francesco P. Chietera
Hardware 2024, 2(2), 85-105; https://doi.org/10.3390/hardware2020005 - 02 Apr 2024
Viewed by 505
Abstract
Additive manufacturing has emerged as a transformative methodology in numerous engineering domains, with the fabrication of antennas and electromagnetic devices being a promising application area. This study presents a comprehensive review of the application of these technologies for manufacturing electromagnetic devices, offering a [...] Read more.
Additive manufacturing has emerged as a transformative methodology in numerous engineering domains, with the fabrication of antennas and electromagnetic devices being a promising application area. This study presents a comprehensive review of the application of these technologies for manufacturing electromagnetic devices, offering a categorized analysis based on different types of additive manufacturing techniques. Each category is examined, and its characteristics are briefly described, highlighting not only the most innovative and significant devices fabricated using specific technologies, but also identifying their limitations and strengths. Through a dual analysis, this paper provides a deep understanding of the potential of and challenges associated with using different additive manufacturing technologies in the design and crafting of electromagnetic components. Moreover, this review offers recommendations for future studies, suggesting how the unique features of this new manufacturing paradigm could be further leveraged for breakthroughs in the electromagnetic field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 67956 KiB  
Article
A New RTI Portable Instrument for Surface Morphological Characterization
by Julie Lemesle and Maxence Bigerelle
Hardware 2024, 2(2), 66-84; https://doi.org/10.3390/hardware2020004 - 02 Apr 2024
Viewed by 351
Abstract
A new instrument using reflectance transformation imaging (RTI), named MorphoLight, has been developed for surface characterization. This instrument is designed to be adjustable to surfaces, ergonomic, and uses a combination of high-resolution imaging functions, i.e., focus stacking (FS) and high dynamic range (HDR), [...] Read more.
A new instrument using reflectance transformation imaging (RTI), named MorphoLight, has been developed for surface characterization. This instrument is designed to be adjustable to surfaces, ergonomic, and uses a combination of high-resolution imaging functions, i.e., focus stacking (FS) and high dynamic range (HDR), to improve the image quality. A topographical analysis method is proposed with the instrument. This method is an improvement of the surface gradient characterization by light reflectance (SGCLR) method. This aims to analyze slope/curvature maps, traditionally studied in RTI, but also to find the most relevant lighting position and 3D surface parameter which highlight morphological signatures on surfaces and/or discriminate surfaces. RTI measurements and analyses are performed on two zones, sky and sea, of a naval painting which have the same color palette but different painting strokes. From the statistical analysis using bootstrapping and analysis of variance (ANOVA), it is highlighted that the high-resolution images (stacked and tonemapped from HDR images) improve the image quality and make it possible to better see a difference between both painting zones. This difference is highlighted by the fractal dimension for a lighting position (θ, φ) = (30°, 225°); the fractal dimension of the sea part is higher because of the presence of larger brushstrokes and painting heaps. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop