Next Article in Journal
(All-in-One) Power Supply System for Mobile and Network-Wired Raspberry Pi-Based Internet of Things Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Design of Control Circuit for Tunable Semiconductor Laser for Fiber Sensing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Hardware
Volume 1
Issue 1
10.3390/hardware1010004
hardware-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Turning a 3D Printer into a HPLC Fraction Collector: A Tool for Compound-Specific Stable Isotope Measurements

by
Matheus C. Carvalho
1,* and
Joanne M. Oakes
2
1
Southern Cross Analytical Research Services, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
2
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hardware 2023, 1(1), 29-53; https://doi.org/10.3390/hardware1010004
Submission received: 30 October 2023 / Revised: 28 November 2023 / Accepted: 1 December 2023 / Published: 7 December 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) can provide unique insights into the cycling of elements including carbon and nitrogen. One approach for CSIA is the use of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to separate compounds of interest, followed by analysis of these compounds using an elemental analyser coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer. A key component of this technique is the fraction collector, which automatically collects compounds as they are separated by HPLC. Here, we present a fraction collector that is a simple adaptation of a 3D printer, and, thus, can be easily adopted by any laboratory already equipped for HPLC. In addition to the much lower cost compared to commercial alternatives, this adaptation has the advantage for CSIA that the 3D printer is able to heat the collected fractions, which is not true for many commercial fraction collectors. Heating allows faster evaporation of the solvent, so that the dried compounds can be measured by EA–IRMS immediately. The procedure can be repeated consecutively so that diluted solutions can have the compounds concentrated for analysis. Any computer-controlled HPLC can be integrated to the fraction collector used here by means of AutoIt.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Compound-specific isotope analysis is the name given to a group of analytical techniques that generally consist of isolating specific chemical compounds and then measuring them for their stable isotope composition [1,2]. The term is used to differentiate from isotope analysis performed without the initial separation step, which is known as bulk isotope analysis. Targets for compound specific isotope analysis include carbohydrates [3,4,5], amino acids [3,6,7,8,9,10,11], and fatty acids [3,11,12,13,14].
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is one technique that enables compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA). HPLC is used to separate dissolved compounds in a liquid sample by passing the solution through a chromatographic column. The chromatographic column has stronger affinity for some compounds compared to others, and this makes compounds elute from the column at different times. There have been numerous studies in which samples separated by HPLC have been subsequently measured using isotope ration mass spectrometry (IRMS), for a range of chemical elements [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. HPLC–IRMS can be achieved using online HPLC–IRMS, where a HPLC pump is directly connected to an IRMS machine [23], but this approach has some limitations: it is limited to carbon isotopes only (while IRMS can measure many different elements); it can only operate using low-flow water as the mobile phase (in contrast, HPLC can operate using many other solvents, including organic solvents, which cannot be used for online HPLC–IRMS); and it demands the use of corrosive chemicals and fragile membranes/filaments, which make the operation of the system highly labor (and capital)- intensive [24]. Furthermore, on-line HPLC–IRMS demands specialized equipment that is not present in most IRMS laboratories [24]. An alternative to online HPLC–IRMS is offline HPLC-IRMS, where compounds separated by HPLC are physically collected then subsequently analysed with an IRMS. While not as efficient as the online approach, offline HPLC–IRMS is arguably more flexible, robust, and accessible, because there is no limitation of solvent or target element, there is no need for specialized interfaces between the HPLC and the IRMS, and HPLC is a very common technique present in many laboratories.
A key element of offline HPLC–IRMS is the use of a fraction collector, which is a device that automatically collects the compounds as they elute from HPLC. Here, we show how a common 3D printer can be easily adapted to function as a fraction collector, with the ultimate aim of enabling stable isotope analyses for compounds separated using HPLC.

2. Design

2.1. Justification of the Design

Fraction collectors for HPLC typically consist of delivery tubing and a container tray. The delivery tubing (or the tray) is moved so that the liquid eluting from the HPLC, corresponding to specific peaks of the various compounds separated by the HPLC, can be delivered to the individual compartments within the tray. This allows separate collection of each of the desired compounds.
Fraction collectors can be seen as a kind of autosampler. This means that they are among the simplest instruments in a laboratory. Despite their simplicity, commercial fraction collectors are arguably overpriced, as is most commercial scientific equipment [25,26,27]. This has prompted scientists to build their own fraction collectors [28,29,30,31]. Adapting these designs, or some autosampler designs [32], could be an option for our purposes. However, we realized that a simpler approach would be to adapt commercially available 3D printers [33,34]. The main advantages of adapting a 3D printer to function as a fraction collector are: (1) low cost; (2) wide availability; (3) high similarity in function. This similarity consists of the ability of 3D printers to move the extruder (equivalent to the delivery tubing) and the printing bed so that positions in 3D space can be reached. Also, most current 3D printers have an advantage compared to autosamplers that might also be repurposed as fraction collectors: 3D printers are equipped with a heated bed, which is used to aid printing. A heated bed is convenient for a fraction collector because it allows the collected liquid to be simultaneously evaporated, so that only the non-volatile compounds remain in each container as dry powders. This way, the collected fractions can be immediately taken for diverse chemical measurements, including stable isotope analyses of carbon and nitrogen, which are our main interest.

2.2. 3D-Printer Modifications

The fraction collector used in the current study consists of a 3D printer (3D printer touch, Balco) that had its extruder removed and replaced with a simple tube holder for the polyether ether ketone (PEEK) tubing coming from the HPLC. A metal tray (PAL TR98, CTC analytics) was placed on the heat bed of the 3D printer using double-sided tape. A tube leading to a waste drum was attached to the side of the 3D printer body to allow for waste collection.
Instead of the original control board for the 3D printer, an MKS-GEN-L board (Makerbase) was connected to the stepper motors, the heat bed, and the power supply of the 3D printer. Replacing the control board is not strictly necessary, but we have familiarity with the MKS-GEN-L board, and, thus, opted for this approach. The Marlin firmware was uploaded to the board to allow the control of the stepper motors and heat bed. Stepper motor drivers (A4988) were installed on the board. A list of the components used is in the bill of materials (Table 1).

2.3. Bill of Materials

Table 1. Bill of materials.
Table 1. Bill of materials.
ComponentSourceCost
3D printer Prusa I3 style 1https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/155077037136 (accessed on 30 November 2023)AUD 232.00
MKS GEN L boardhttps://www.ebay.com.au/itm/354788810185 (accessed on 30 November 2023)AUD 70.00
A4988 drivers (5 units)https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/134438897517 (accessed on 30 November 2023)AUD 11.00
PAL TR98 trayhttps://www.palparts.com/product/pal-tr98/ (accessed on 30 November 2023)AUD 1045.00
Male-female DuPont cable for stepper motors (5 units)https://3dprintingperth.com/products/stepper-motor-cable-male-to-female-extension-dupont-wire?variant=39471376826481 (accessed on 30 November 2023)AUD 15.00
Adapter model BT7242A for stepper motorshttps://www.aliexpress.com/i/32881420875.html (accessed on 30 November 2023)AUD 5.00
Waste tubehttps://www.labfriend.com.au/bsafe-corrugated-tubing-pp-ø-65-x-100-mm-t-175-mm (accessed on 30 November 2023)AUD 50.00
Cable holder for waste tubehttps://www.ebay.com.au/itm/203860080384 (accessed on 30 November 2023)AUD 4.00
M3 screw, nut, and spaceHardware storeLess than AUD 5.00
3D-printed tube holderAppendix ALess than AUD 1.00
Total AUD 1438.00
1 A model is suggested here, but any model with similar design can be used.

3. Build Instructions

The instructions presented here are for one specific model of 3D printer. However, they can be easily adapted for most other similar models available on the market.
The first step is to remove the filament extruder (Figure 1).
With the extruder removed, the tube holder can be attached to its place (Figure 2) using two M3 screws and nuts. The design file for the tube holder is available from https://osf.io/d24ek/ (accessed on 30 November 2023). Note that this tube holder was designed specifically for this 3D printer and for the tube diameter (1.5 mm) used with the HPLC. Different dimensions will demand a different design.
The next modification is to attach a metal tray to the printing bed (Figure 3). Here, we used a PAL TR98 tray from CTC analytics. Metal trays are suitable to allow heating, and thereby concentration, of the samples upon collection. We used double-sided adhesive tape to attach the tray to the bed.
The next steps involve re-wiring the printer so that a different control board is used instead of the one that comes with the printer. By turning the printer upside down and removing the lower cover, the cables become accessible. The cables for the stepper motors, for the heated bed, and for the power supply must be disconnected from the main board (Figure 4).
Instead of the original control board in the 3D printer, we used the MKS-GEN-L control board because of our familiarity with it [32]. The board needs to be prepared to be connected to the stepper motors. The first step is to upload the Marlin firmware [35] (download from https://osf.io/d24ek/, accessed on 30 November 2023) to the board. This can be achieved by using the Arduino IDE (download from https://www.arduino.cc/en/software, accessed on 30 November 2023). The board needs to be connected to a computer using a USB cable. The configuration parameters used in the firmware were optimized for this specific 3D printer model. They may need to be modified for different 3D printer models.
Once the board is disconnected from the computer, the stepper motor drivers can be connected to the board (Figure 5). Here, A4988 drivers were used.
Once the control board is prepared, it can be connected to the power supply, heat bed, and stepper motors (Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). Notice that for the Z axis an adapter (model BT7242A) was used to enable use of two motors. Different 3D printer models may need different arrangements.
Once all cable connections are complete, the control board should be attached to the top of the 3D printer body using an M3 screw, nut, and a spacer (Figure 9).
Organize the cables at the back of the 3D printer, paying attention to their possible interference with the path of the moveable parts (Figure 10). Cable ties are useful for this purpose.
Attach the waste tube to the side of the 3D printer body (Figure 11). It must be in a position that can be reached by the tube holder that will support the HPLC delivery line, but not on top of the tray where the samples will be collected. In our configuration, the tube was cut in half to allow waste to drip into the tube from above and was held in place using a metal tube. Using a waste tube connected to a waste drum allows for line purging and the discarding of undesired eluents.
Attach the delivery line from the HPLC to the tube holder on the 3D printer (Figure 12). A portion of the tube (about 3 mm) should hang beneath the holder so that the sample solution falls without interference from the holder. The delivery line should be as short as possible to minimize dispersion of the HPLC eluents before collection.
Once the fraction collector is assembled, the sample tray can be loaded with tin (PN SC9428, Sercon) or silver (PN SC1295, Sercon) capsules (Figure 13). Silver capsules are needed if the eluent is corrosive. The capsule size (6 mm × 9 mm in diameter) was chosen to match the tray. A different tray would demand a different tin capsule size.
The control board is connected to the computer, and the power supply to the wall. When the power is turned on, the fraction collector will be ready to use. Of course, in addition to the fraction collector preparation, the HPLC system should also be prepared in accordance with the protocols used for the separation to be performed.
Finally, because the procedure takes many hours (often more than a full day) to complete, it is important that contamination (e.g., dust) is avoided. The system should be placed in a clean and quiet place, in a closed room, preferably with air conditioning.

4. Operating Instructions

4.1. Control Board Preparation

The fraction collector was controlled using the Hype!Terminal program (https://osf.io/d24ek/, accessed on 30 November 2023), which allows commands to be sent through COM ports (including USB, which connects the control board to the computer).
Te first action when launching Hype!Terminal is to configure the COM port (Figure 14). Most parameters in the configuration do not need to be changed, except for the port number and the BAUD rate (bits per second). The port number needs to be known previously (e.g., by checking the device manager utility on the Windows operating system). Bits per second need to be changed to 115,200.
Once the connection with the board is established, the command “M121” must be sent to allow the use of negative coordinates when sending commands to the stepper motors. This and the COM port configuration need to be performed every time the program is started.

4.2. Basic Commands

Once the control board is connected and negative coordinates can be used, the fraction collector can be controlled from the computer using Hype!Terminal. Movements are achieved using the command G1. For example, G1 × 1F500 moves the HPLC tube horizontally one unit with 500 speed units. G1Z2F500 moves it vertically two units. G1Y3F500 moves the heat bed (and consequently the tray) three units. More than a single axis can be used as input at any given time. For example, the command G1X3Y4F500 will move the HPLC tube and the tray simultaneously. The command M114 can be used to verify the current position. If it is desired that the current position becomes zero, the command is G92. For example, G92X0Y0Z0 forces all axes to have the value of zero.
The heat bed can be warmed using the command M140. Using M140S80 will warm the bed to 80 °C. It is useful to preheat the sample tray, as it can take some minutes to reach the final temperature. To turn off the heat bed, use M140S0.

4.3. Determining Important Positions

Stepper motors do not use absolute positioning, but instead rely on positions that are relative to arbitrary origin points. When the board is connected, it assumes all positions (X, Y, and Z) are equal to zero. It is, therefore, possible to determine all other relevant positions in relation to any initial position. However, it is more convenient to start from an easily reproducible position so that the other positions do not need to be redefined every time the machine is started. Here, the zero positions were determined as the leftmost possible position for X, the frontmost position for Y, and an arbitrary height for Z, at which the HPLC tube can move without touching the waste tube (Figure 15).
The next important positions are the four corners of the tray that can be reached by the HPLC tube (Figure 16). Both the leftmost (X = 2.30; positions given here are likely to be different for different 3D printers and trays) and rightmost (X = 5.95) positions of the tray are accessible, but only 11 of the 14 back-to-front positions are accessible (Y from 0.30 to 7.05).
The remaining important positions are the vertical positions. For the waste, these were Z = −1. For moving above the tray, Z = −17, and for liquid delivery to the tray, Z = −19.
The determination of the positions normally only needs to be performed once. It may need to be repeated if the tray is removed and put back in place, for example.

4.4. Automated Control

The fraction collector and the HPLC were integrated using an AutoIt script [36]. AutoIt allows the integration of different programs using seamless control of the Windows elements, or mouse click and keyboard entries [36]. Here, we employed both approaches. To control Hype!Terminal, AutoIt sent seamless commands to the input field (Figure 17).
The fraction collector worked together with a HPLC system (Ultimate 3000, Thermo Fisher), controlled with Chromeleon 7 (Thermo Fisher). The system was equipped with a solvent pump, an autosampler, and a column compartment with temperature control.
To control the HPLC pump, seamless commands were sent to the input field for flow control (Figure 18). However, to control the HPLC autosampler, seamless commands did not work, and, thus, automated mouse and keyboard strokes were sent to the “Pos.” input box, and to the “Inject” button (Figure 19).
A typical script would consist of the following instructions:
(1)
Turn on the HPLC pump (by sending a command to the Chromeleon pump control interface);
(2)
Inject a sample volume from a sample in the HPLC autosampler (by sending a command to the Chromeleon sampler control interface);
(3)
Wait a predetermined time until the compound of interest is at the exit of the tube in the fraction collector (this needs to be determined beforehand);
(4)
Move the HPLC tube to the first tin capsule (by sending commands to Hype!Terminal);
(5)
Wait for a predetermined time above the tin capsule so that the compound is completely collected in it;
(6)
Move to the next tin capsule (by sending commands to Hype!Terminal);
(7)
Repeat step 6 for as many compounds as are needed to be collected (by sending commands to Hype!Terminal);
(8)
Move to the waste tube (by sending commands to Hype!Terminal);
(9)
Turn the HPLC pump off (by sending a command to the Chromeleon pump control interface);
(10)
Wait until the collected liquid has completely evaporated;
(11)
Repeat all steps for multiple replicates of the sample, as required to collect sufficient material for elemental analysis coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA–IRMS).
A script example can be found in Appendix B, and a video showing the setup working can be found as Supplementary Material Video S1 and on https://youtu.be/uQRLlZQone4 (accessed on 30 November 2023).

5. Validation

Stable Carbon Isotope Analysis of Glucose

The fraction collector was tested for accuracy in the measurement of glucose in a water solution. The HPLC was equipped with a HyperRez XP Carbohydrate H+ (Thermo Fisher, Sydney, Australia) column kept at 75 °C in the column compartment. A guard column (also HyperRez XP Carbohydrate H+) was used, as well as a frit between connections to prevent column clogging. The frit was replaced every time pressure surpassed 40 bar to avoid deterioration of the column. This limit also dictated the maximum flow rate that could be used, which was 0.6 mL min−1. Milli-q water was used as the solvent.
The solution of glucose (Sigma Aldrich, Sydney, Australia, 99.9% purity) was prepared using milli-q water, with a final concentration of 4 mM of carbon. This concentration is probably high compared to many natural samples, but was chosen as a simple starting point to demonstrate the viability of the fraction collector system. The glucose solution was transferred to 2 mL vials that were placed in the HPLC autosampler. The autosampler injected 0.1 mL of the glucose solution into the HPLC. At a flow rate of 0.3 mL min−1, glucose eluted from the column after 22 min, whilst at a flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1, glucose eluted at 11 min. These retention times were determined via preliminary injections with collections every minute. Based on these retention times, a narrow collection range, between 10 and 12 min for 0.6 mL min−1 and between 20 and 24 min for 0.3 mL min−1 was employed. Repeated injections were performed, and it was found that glucose was better collected using a flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1; the time spent on collection was smaller, but more importantly the peak was sharper, and concentrated only in a single tin capsule, whilst with 0.3 mL min−1, the peak was spread across two tin capsules (Figure 20). The δ13C of glucose (−10.5 ± 0.1 mUr) was determined from previous measurements of the solid powder using EA–IRMS. Empty tin capsules would have low peak areas when analysed with EA–IRMS and their carbon stable isotope ratios (δ13C) would be different from the known value for glucose, while tin capsules containing glucose would have larger areas and δ13C closer to the known value. The actual value for the compound (glucose, in this case) collected in the tin capsules is calculated by using δ13C values for empty tin capsules as blanks, and applying a mass balance. It was found that for injections performed at 0.6 mL min−1, the average value for glucose was −10.4 ± 0.25 mUr, n = 7, while for 0.3 mL min−1, results were −10.4 ± 0.13 mUr, n = 3. In both cases, the results are very close to the known δ13C for the glucose powder used to make the glucose solution that was tested.

6. Conclusions

The fraction collector presented here is a low-cost and easy-to-build solution to prepare compound-specific samples for stable isotope analyses. Compared to most other systems (open-source and commercial), it has the added advantage of concentrating the compounds via evaporation as the collection proceeds.
The 3D printer used here was based on a very popular template (Prusa I3), and so the adaptation of any 3D printer of this family should be as simple as for the one used here. Most other 3D printer models should be also amenable to use, provided they are equipped with a heat bed.
The fraction collector performed very well without issues for three days uninterrupted, and there is no reason to doubt that it could function uninterrupted for much longer. Compared to the normal operation of a 3D printer, the fraction collector makes much less intensive use of the stepper motors, but equivalent or higher use of the heat bed.
Here, only water was used as a solvent. However, many HPLC methods employ corrosive solutions like acids or bases, or organic solvents like methanol, which is very toxic. If hazardous solvents need to be employed, modifications on the basic design provided here are necessary. An easy solution for volatile solvents is to place the fraction collector inside a fume hood. For corrosive solvents, instead of tin capsules, silver capsules may be necessary (e.g., SC1295, from Sercon).
Although the fraction collector was presented here as a solution for CSIA, it could be similarly employed for other analyses. A very simple adaptation would be, for example, replacement of tin capsules with small Eppendorf vials correctly positioned in the collection tray.
Here, the HPLC system was not equipped with sensors, which demanded that subsequent analysis using EA–IRMS was performed every time, even when the purpose of the operation was not really to measure the compounds, but simply to determine retention time, for example. This is clearly a sub-optimal approach, especially in the early phases of method development. A better solution would be to have the HPLC equipped with a sensor, so that tasks like optimization of retention time determination and peak separation could be performed without requiring EA–IRMS. By employing sensors, “smart” fraction collection could also be attempted, allowing for even further optimization [31].
Peak spreading (Figure 20) and other issues, such as co-elution of different substances at the same time, are known challenges for compound-specific isotope ratio mass spectrometry, which are detailed elsewhere [1]. Despite these problems, fraction collection is a technique with established scope in numerous scientific fields. We hope that the introduction of our 3D-printer-based fraction collector contributes to an even more widespread adoption of the fraction collection approach.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/hardware1010004/s1, Video S1: FractionCollector.mp4.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, software, and validation: M.C.C.; resources and writing: M.C.C. and J.M.O.; project administration and funding acquisition: J.M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Australian Research Council, ARC LIEF grant number LE130100153, awarded to J.M.O.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Any data can be obtained by emailing the first author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Leslie Christidis and Graham Lancaster, both Southern Cross University, for their continuing support to open-source projects at the university.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Open Scad code for the tube holder.
Hardware 01 00004 g0a1
Figure A1. Three-dimensional drawing of tube holder.
Figure A1. Three-dimensional drawing of tube holder.
Hardware 01 00004 g0a1
//lowest part of the block
basex = 42;
basey = 8;
basez = 3;
basetx = 0;
basety = 0;
basetz = 0;
 
//hole
holer = 1.5;
holez = basez;
holetx = basetx+5;
holety = basety+4;
holetz = basetz;
 
//neck
neckx = 6;
necky = 8;
neckz = 10;
necktx = 12;
neckty = 0;
necktz = basez;
 
 
$fn=64;
 
difference(){
translate([basetx,basety,basetz]){cube([basex,basey,basez]);}//base
#translate([holetx,holety,holetz]){cylinder( holez,  holer,  holer, false);}
#translate([holetx+10,holety,holetz]){cylinder( holez,  0.8,  0.8, false);}
#translate([holetx+32,holety,holetz]){cylinder( holez,  holer,  holer, false);}
 
}
 
difference(){
translate([necktx,neckty,necktz]){cube([neckx,necky,neckz]);}//base
#translate([holetx+10,holety,holetz]){cylinder( 20,  0.8,  0.8, false);}
 
 
}
 

Appendix B

Example of AutoIt script to enable the 3D printer to work as a fraction collector for HPLC. This script is strictly for the example provided here. Different equipment and software will demand a different script.
Hardware 01 00004 i001Hardware 01 00004 i002Hardware 01 00004 i003Hardware 01 00004 i004

References

  1. Meier-Augenstein, W. GC and IRMS technology for 13C and 15N analysis on organic compounds and related gases. In Handbook of Stable Isotope Analytical Techniques; De Groot, H.J., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; Volume 1, pp. 153–176. [Google Scholar]
  2. Whiteman, J.P.; Elliott Smith, E.A.; Besser, A.C.; Newsome, S.D. A Guide to Using Compound-Specific Stable Isotope Analysis to Study the Fates of Molecules in Organisms and Ecosystems. Diversity 2019, 11, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Veuger, B.; van Oevelen, D.; Middelburg, J.J. Fate of microbial nitrogen, carbon, hydrolysable amino acids, monosaccharides, and fatty acids in sediment. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 83, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moerdjik-Poortvliet, T.C.W.; van Breugel, P.; Sabbe, K.; Beauchard, O.; Stal, L.J.; Boschker, H.T.S. Seasonal changes in the biochemical fate of carbon fixed by benthic diatoms in intertidal sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2018, 63, 550–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Moerdijk-Poortvliet, T.C.W.; Stal, L.J.; Boshker, H.T.S. LC/IRMS analysis: A powerful technique to trace carbon flow in microphytobenthic communities in intertidal sediments. J. Sea Res. 2014, 92, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oakes, J.; Riekenberg, P.; Eyre, B. Assimilation and short-term processing of microphytobenthos nitrogen in intertidal sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2020, 65, 2377–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Riekenberg, P.; Oakes, J.M.; Eyre, B.D. Uptake of dissolved organic and inorganic nitrogen in microalgae-dominated sediment: Comparing dark and light in situ and ex situ additions of 15N. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2017, 571, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Riekenberg, P.; van der Heide, T.; Holthuijsen, S.J.; van der Veer, H.W.; van der Meer, M.T.J. Compound-specific stable isotope analysis of amino acid nitrogen reveals detrital support of microphytobenthos in the Dutch Wadden Sea benthic food web. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 10, 951047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ohkouchi, N.; Chikaraishi, Y.; Close, H.G.; Fry, B.; Larsen, T.; Madigan, D.J.; McCarthy, M.D. Advances in the application of amino acid nitrogen isotopic analysis in ecological and biogeochemical studies. Org. Geochem. 2017, 113, 150–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pollierer, M.M.; Larsen, T.; Popatov, A.; Bruckner, A.; Heethoff, M.; Dyckmans, J.; Scheu, S. Compound-specific isotope analysis of amino acids as a new tool to uncover trophic chains in soil food webs. Ecol. Monogr. 2019, 89, e01384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hanz, U.; Riekenberg, P.; de Kluijver, A.; van der meer, M.; Middelburg, J.J.; de Goeji, J.M.; Bart, M.C.; Wurz, E.; Colaço, A.; Duineveld, G.C.A.; et al. The important role of sponges in carbon and nitrogen cycling in a deep-sea biological hotspot. Funct. Ecol. 2022, 36, 2188–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oakes, J.; Rysgaard, S.; Glud, R.N.; Eyre, B.D. The transformation and fate of sub-Arctic microphytobenthos carbon revealed through 13C-labeling. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2016, 61, 2296–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Burian, A.; Nielsen, J.M.; Hansen, T.; Bermudez, R.; Winder, M. The potential of fatty acid isotopes to trace trophic transfer in aquatic food-webs. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2020, 375, 20190652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Twining, C.W.; Taipale, S.J.; Ruess, L.; Bec, A.; Martin-Creuzburg, D.; Kainz, M.J. Stable isotopes of fatty acids: Current and future perspectives for advancing trophic ecology. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci. 2020, 375, 20190641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Broek, T.A.B.; McCarthy, M.D. A new approach to δ15N compound-specific amino acid trophic position measurements: Preparative high pressure liquid chromatography technique for purifying underivatized amino acids for stable isotope analysis. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 2014, 12, 840–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Phillips, A.A.; Wu, F.; Sessions, A.L. Sulfur isotope analysis of cysteine and methionine via preparatory liquid chromatography and elemental analyzer isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2020, 35, e9007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sun, Y.; Ogawa, N.O.; Ishikawa, N.F.; Blattmann, T.M.; Takano, Y.; Ohkouchi, N. Application of a porous graphitic carbon column to carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of underivatized individual amino acids using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with elemental analyzer/isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2023, 37, e9602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, L.; Lee, W.-m.C.; Kreider-Mueller, A.; Kuhnel, E.; Baca, J.; Ji, C.; Altabet, M.A. High-precision measurement of phenylalanine and glutamic acid δ15N by coupling ion-exchange chromatography and purge-and-trap continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 35, e9085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yun, H.Y.; Won, E.-J.; Choi, J.; Cho, Y.; Lim, D.-J.; Kim, I.-S.; Shin, K.-H. Stable isotope analysis of residual pesticides via High Performance Liquid Chromatography and Elemental Analyzer–Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry. Molecules 2022, 27, 8587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Broek, T.A.B.; Walker, B.D.; Andreasen, D.H.; McCarthy, M.D. High-precision measurement of phenylalanine δ15N values for environmental samples: A new approach coupling high-pressure liquid chromatography purification and elemental analyzer isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 27, 2327–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mauve, C.; Bleton, J.; Bathellier, C.; Lelarge-Trouverie, C.; Guérard, F.; Ghashghaie, J.; Tchapla, A.; Tcherkez, G. Kinetic 12C/13C isotope fractionation by invertase: Evidence for a small in vitro isotope effect and comparison of two techniques for the isotopic analysis of carbohydrates. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 23, 2499–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thompson, R.A.; Morello, D.R.; Panicker, S.; Toske, S.G.; Li, L. Carbon and nitrogen isotopic analysis of morphine from opium and heroin samples originating in the four major heroin producing regions. Drug Test. Anal. 2022, 14, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Godin, J.-P.; Fay, L.B.; Hopfgarther, G. Liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry for 13C isotopic analysis in life science research. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2007, 26, 751–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Perini, M.; Bontempo, L. Liquid Chromatography coupled to Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (LC-IRMS): A review. Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 147, 116515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pearce, J.M. Open-Source Lab: How to Build Your Own Hardware and Reduce Research Costs; Elsevier: Waltham, MA, USA, 2014; p. 271. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pearce, J.M. Economic savings for scientific free and open source technology: A review. HardwareX 2020, 8, e00139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bravo-Martinez, J. Open source 3D-printed 1000 μL micropump. HardwareX 2018, 3, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Caputo, M.; Lyles, J.T.; Salazar, M.S.; Quave, C.L. LEGO MINDSTORMS Fraction Collector: A Low-Cost Tool for a Preparative High-Performance Liquid Chromatography System. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 1687–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ficarro, S.B.; Alexander, W.M.; Tavarves, I.; Marto, J.A. Open source fraction collector/MALDI spotter for proteomics. HardwareX 2022, 11, e00305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Booeshaghi, A.S.; Kil, Y.; Min, K.H.; Gehring, J.; Pachter, L. Low-cost, scalable, and automated fluid sampling for fluidics applications. HardwareX 2021, 10, e00201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Medina, D.A.V.; Lozada-Blanco, A.; Rodrígues, J.P.G.; Lanças, F.M.; Santos-Neto, A.J. An open-source smart fraction collector for isocratic preparative liquid chromatography. HardwareX 2023, 15, e00462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carvalho, M.C. Automated weighing in the stable isotope lab: When less is more. MethodsX 2023, 10, 102207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baas, S.; Saggiomo, V. Ender3 3D printer kit transformed into open, programmable syringe pump set. HardwareX 2021, 10, e00219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, C.; Wijnen, B.; Pearce, J.M. Open-Source 3-D Platform for Low-Cost Scientific Instrument Ecosystem. J. Lab. Autom. 2016, 21, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Campbell, T.; Jones, J.F.X. Design and implementation of a low cost, modular, adaptable and open-source XYZ positioning system for neurophysiology. HardwareX 2020, 7, e00098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Carvalho, M.C. Practical Laboratory Automation Made Easy with AutoIt; Wiley VCH: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; p. 290. [Google Scholar]
Hardware 01 00004 g001
Figure 1. 3D printer without its filament extruder. Arrow points to the extruder support.
Figure 1. 3D printer without its filament extruder. Arrow points to the extruder support.
Hardware 01 00004 g001
Hardware 01 00004 g002
Figure 2. Custom 3D-printed tube holder attached to the extruder support on the 3D printer.
Figure 2. Custom 3D-printed tube holder attached to the extruder support on the 3D printer.
Hardware 01 00004 g002
Hardware 01 00004 g003
Figure 3. Sample tray attached to the printing bed.
Figure 3. Sample tray attached to the printing bed.
Hardware 01 00004 g003
Hardware 01 00004 g004
Figure 4. The 3D-printer turned upside down with the cables disconnected from the control board.
Figure 4. The 3D-printer turned upside down with the cables disconnected from the control board.
Hardware 01 00004 g004
Hardware 01 00004 g005
Figure 5. MKS-GEN-L board with A4988 stepper motor drivers (outlined in white in the figure) attached. The orientation of the drivers is important, as misplacement may lead to driver or board failure. Notice the small screws on each driver positioned to the right of the photo, and away from the power connections of the boardv.
Figure 5. MKS-GEN-L board with A4988 stepper motor drivers (outlined in white in the figure) attached. The orientation of the drivers is important, as misplacement may lead to driver or board failure. Notice the small screws on each driver positioned to the right of the photo, and away from the power connections of the boardv.
Hardware 01 00004 g005
Hardware 01 00004 g006
Figure 6. Power supply connected to the MKS-GEN-L control board.
Figure 6. Power supply connected to the MKS-GEN-L control board.
Hardware 01 00004 g006
Hardware 01 00004 g007
Figure 7. Heat bed connected to the MKS-GEN-L control board.
Figure 7. Heat bed connected to the MKS-GEN-L control board.
Hardware 01 00004 g007
Hardware 01 00004 g008
Figure 8. Stepper motors connected to the MKS-GEN-L control board. Connections indicated by arrows.
Figure 8. Stepper motors connected to the MKS-GEN-L control board. Connections indicated by arrows.
Hardware 01 00004 g008
Hardware 01 00004 g009
Figure 9. Control board attached to the top of the 3D printer body using a screw and a spacer.
Figure 9. Control board attached to the top of the 3D printer body using a screw and a spacer.
Hardware 01 00004 g009
Hardware 01 00004 g010
Figure 10. Cables at the back of the 3D printer.
Figure 10. Cables at the back of the 3D printer.
Hardware 01 00004 g010
Hardware 01 00004 g011
Figure 11. Waste tube attached to the 3D printer.
Figure 11. Waste tube attached to the 3D printer.
Hardware 01 00004 g011
Hardware 01 00004 g012
Figure 12. HPLC tube attached to the tube holder on the 3D printer.
Figure 12. HPLC tube attached to the tube holder on the 3D printer.
Hardware 01 00004 g012
Hardware 01 00004 g013
Figure 13. Sample tray loaded with tin capsules.
Figure 13. Sample tray loaded with tin capsules.
Hardware 01 00004 g013
Hardware 01 00004 g014
Figure 14. COM port configuration on Hype!Terminal.
Figure 14. COM port configuration on Hype!Terminal.
Hardware 01 00004 g014
Hardware 01 00004 g015
Figure 15. HPLC delivery line at the zero position.
Figure 15. HPLC delivery line at the zero position.
Hardware 01 00004 g015
Hardware 01 00004 g016
Figure 16. Sample tray with the two extreme positions that can be reached by the HPLC delivery line marked by white circles.
Figure 16. Sample tray with the two extreme positions that can be reached by the HPLC delivery line marked by white circles.
Hardware 01 00004 g016
Hardware 01 00004 g017
Figure 17. Hype!Terminal graphical interface. The input fields that received AutoIt instructions were the text box after “Command” and the “Send” button.
Figure 17. Hype!Terminal graphical interface. The input fields that received AutoIt instructions were the text box after “Command” and the “Send” button.
Hardware 01 00004 g017
Hardware 01 00004 g018
Figure 18. Chromeleon interface for pump control. Commands were sent to the “Flow/pressure” input box (it has a value of 0.000 in the figure).
Figure 18. Chromeleon interface for pump control. Commands were sent to the “Flow/pressure” input box (it has a value of 0.000 in the figure).
Hardware 01 00004 g018
Hardware 01 00004 g019
Figure 19. Chromeleon interface for autosampler control. Commands were sent to the “Pos.” input box, and to the “Inject” button.
Figure 19. Chromeleon interface for autosampler control. Commands were sent to the “Pos.” input box, and to the “Inject” button.
Hardware 01 00004 g019
Hardware 01 00004 g020
Figure 20. Typical results for glucose collected four times using the 3D printer fraction collector interfaced with an HPLC, and analysed using an elemental analyser coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA–IRMS). Peak areas are proportional to the amount of carbon in the tin capsule, while δ13C represents the “delta” notation used to describe the abundance of 13C compared to 12C in a substance (SI units Ur).
Figure 20. Typical results for glucose collected four times using the 3D printer fraction collector interfaced with an HPLC, and analysed using an elemental analyser coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA–IRMS). Peak areas are proportional to the amount of carbon in the tin capsule, while δ13C represents the “delta” notation used to describe the abundance of 13C compared to 12C in a substance (SI units Ur).
Hardware 01 00004 g020
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carvalho, M.C.; Oakes, J.M. Turning a 3D Printer into a HPLC Fraction Collector: A Tool for Compound-Specific Stable Isotope Measurements. Hardware 2023, 1, 29-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/hardware1010004

AMA Style

Carvalho MC, Oakes JM. Turning a 3D Printer into a HPLC Fraction Collector: A Tool for Compound-Specific Stable Isotope Measurements. Hardware. 2023; 1(1):29-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/hardware1010004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carvalho, Matheus C., and Joanne M. Oakes. 2023. "Turning a 3D Printer into a HPLC Fraction Collector: A Tool for Compound-Specific Stable Isotope Measurements" Hardware 1, no. 1: 29-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/hardware1010004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop