The Association of Cardiovascular Disease with the T3111C Polymorphism in the CLOCK Gene †
1
Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia
2
DNA Laboratory, Genos Ltd., HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Medicine, 20–30 June 2021; Available online: https://iecmd2021.sciforum.net/ .
Med. Sci. Forum 2021, 6(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECMD2021-10314
Published: 21 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Medicine)
Abstract
:Background and Objectives: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are among the leading causes of death worldwide, although CVD mortality has decreased in developed countries. Numerous pathophysiological processes lead to the development of CVDs. The circadian rhythm coordinates many physiological processes, and its disruption can lead to many pathophysiological changes. One of the significant circadian rhythm genes is the CLOCK gene, whose polymorphisms are associated with CVD risk factors. Research findings of the association between CLOCK gene polymorphism and CVDs and its comorbidities are not consistent. This meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the associations between T3111C polymorphism and the risk of CVDs. Materials and Methods: The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies reporting onthe association between T3111C (rs1801260) in the circadian CLOCK gene and cardiovascular disease and its comorbidities such as obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance, and coronary artery disease. A fixed-effect model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval by comprehensive meta-analysis software. Results: Five independent studies, including case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort research methods, were analyzed with 3123 subjects in total. The meta-analysis revealed a significant association between T3111C polymorphism and cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.16–1.50, p < 0.001) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 91.1%, p < 0.001) and no publication bias. The subgroup analysis on comorbidity related to CVDs revealed that hypertension was associated with T3111C polymorphism (OR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.60–2.54, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis based on available studies using a fixed model shows that T3111C polymorphism in the CLOCK gene is associated with CVD susceptibility.
1. Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are amongst the main reasons for death globally, although CVD mortality has decreased in developed countries [1]. Numerous pathophysiological processes lead to the development of CVDs. The circadian clock coordinates numerous physiological processes, and its interruption can lead to numerous pathophysiological changes [2].
One of the significant circadian rhythm genes is the CLOCK gene. CLOCK protein (Circadian Locomotor Output Cycles Kaput) and ARNTL protein (Aryl hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear Translocator–Like) stimulate the transcription of other circadian rhythm genes. CRY (Cryptochrome) and PER (Period) proteins inhibit the transcription of the CLOCK and ARNTL genes [3,4]. The alternation of light and darkness stimulates such a feedback loop of the circadian rhythm gene. These oscillations of activation and inhibition of circadian rhythm gene expression occur within 24 h. The circadian feedback loop affects the expression of circadian clock genes. Many physiological changes are influenced by these genes and under the control of the central clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) [2,5]. Many CLOCK gene polymorphisms are associated with CVD risk factors [6,7]. However, research findings of the association between CLOCK gene polymorphism and CVDs and its comorbidities are not consistent [8,9,10,11]. The rs1801260 or T3111C polymorphism is a SNP in the 3′ untranslated region of the CLOCK gene.
This meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the associations between T3111C polymorphism and the risk of CVDs.
2. Methods
The Scopus and PubMed databases were searched for studies reporting on the association between T3111C (rs1801260) polymorphism in the circadian CLOCK gene and cardiovascular disease and its comorbidities such as obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance, and coronary artery disease until 20 February 2021 (Figure 1).
2.1. Study Selection
The aim was to identify studies on the association between CLOCK gene polymorphism C3111T and CVDs using the inclusion criteria of cross-sectional, case-control, cohort studies, and only articles in the English language were taken into consideration. Additional inclusion criteria were allele and genotype frequencies, absence of the specific disorder in the control group, and no departure from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in the control group. Studies were excluded if there was no control study group, lacking data on allele frequencies, a case report, a review, a meta-analysis, and studies by the same authors whose data overlap.
2.2. Data Extraction
For each study incorporated in the meta-analysis, the following data were extracted: authors, year of publication, studied population, study design, number of patients and control participants (female, male), selection criteria for patients and controls, the average age of the participants, prevalent ethnicity, type of CVD or CVD risk factor, and genotyping method (Table 1). In addition, allelic frequency in cases and controls, including odds ratios (OR) and p values.
2.3. Statistical Analyses
The Comprehensive Meta-analysis software version 3.3.070 (Biostat) was applied for the performed meta-analyses. If the p values were less than 0.05, associations were confirmed. Cochran’s Q test assessed the statistical heterogeneity among the studies. The fixed-effects model was applied to compute the pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. Publication bias was evaluated utilizing the funnel plot and Egger test for associations with p values less than 0.05.
3. Results and Discussion
The PRISMA flow diagram of the study collection is presented in Figure 1. According to our exclusion and inclusion criteria, five independent studies (one study included two different patient data sets) were incorporated in the present meta-analysis [12,13,14,15]. These studies included case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort research studies, analyzing 3123 subjects in total.
The evaluation of the individual studies’ reliability and validity was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). The NOS assigns up to nine points for the risk of bias in three domains: selection (four points), comparability (two points), and exposure (three points) for case-control and the adapted Newcastle–Ottawa scale for cross-sectional studies assigns up to a maximum of ten points [16]. Additionally, there are three domains: selection (five points), comparability (two points), and outcome (three points). Therefore, studies with or more than nine points were considered very good, while studies with seven to eight points were good. The main factors influencing the quality of the studies were the comparability of the study regarding whether the influences of confounding factors were taken into account. Overall, the qualities of the studies were optimal, with seven or eight NOS points.
The funnel plot of odds ratio (OR) versus standard error was symmetrical, suggesting no publication bias (Figure 2). In addition, Egger’s and Begg’s tests identified no significant publication bias (p = 0.17 and 0.14, respectively). Although the publication bias was not observed, it is possible due to the small number of included studies associated with T3111C polymorphism and the presence of statistical heterogeneity in meta-analysis, which might reflect population differences. Nevertheless, according to the meta-analysis results, the C allele or CC genotype carriers are at a higher risk of developing CVD.
Table 1 presents the properties of the qualified studies. The genotype and allele frequencies are presented in Table 2.
Table 3 reviews the principal outcomes of the present meta-analysis. A statistically significant association between CLOCK T3111C polymorphism and CVD risk was found in the overall population (T versus C: OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.62–0.84, p < 0.001). The same trend toward CVD risk was seen in three other studies with OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.16–1.50, p < 0.001 (Figure 3). The study by Monteleone et al. [12] was an exception, probably due to the low number of participants involved in the study. An exception was the study of Galbete et al. [13], apparently because of the higher average age of the involved participants.
Although many studies showed inconsistency in the association of T3111C polymorphism and CVDs, the present meta-analysis revealed a notable association. An association between CVD and CLOCK T3111C was observed in the overall population under recessive and dominant genetic models and the allelic model. The meta-analysis results showed that T allele or TT genotype carriers were less likely to develop CVD. No departure from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was seen in any of the incorporated studies. A significant association between CVD risk factor, hypertension, and the CLOCK T3111C polymorphism was initially published in the research by Kolomeichul et al. [17]. The patients with C allele have a leaning toward insulin resistance and CVD with significant association (p < 0.001), according to the study by Li et al. [15]. In contrast, Monteleone et al. [12] showed that the CLOCK genotypes were not associated with obesity in humans. However, they confirmed a significant association of the CLOCK genotype between obese (BMI > 40 kg/m2) and overweight participants (BMI ≤ 40 kg/m2). A possible explanation for these contradictory findings may be different inclusion criteria such as inadequate sample size (particularly in the study of Monteleone et al. [12]) and the appearance of confounding risk factors such as eating disorders or the elderly population.
The subgroup analysis on comorbidity related to CVDs revealed that hypertension was associated with T3111C polymorphism (OR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.60–2.54, p < 0.001, Figure 4A), while there was an association of T3111C with obesity as a risk factor for CVDs (Figure 4B).
Our study had some limitations. First, only a limited number of articles for most of the T3111C polymorphism was available. Second, the database search on manuscripts written in the English language, and accordingly, some publications might have been omitted. Third, the original studies utilized different diagnostic criteria, affecting the meta-analysis results and leading to relatively high heterogeneity. Fourth, subgroup analyses in different populations were not performed, although, in most included studies, populations were mainly Caucasian. Fifth, this meta-analysis was based on estimates without adjusting the population characteristics such as age and ethnicity. Despite these limitations, the present study has some advantages. First, the statistical power was increased because a large number of respondents were derived from different studies (a total of 3123 participants). Second, the association of T3111C with different risk factors for CVD was investigated in this meta-analysis.
4. Conclusions
The present meta-analysis based on available studies showed that T3111C polymorphism in the CLOCK gene is associated with CVD susceptibility. Furthermore, carriers of the C allele had a higher risk of developing CVD. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the mechanistic link between T3111C polymorphism and cardiovascular diseases.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, I.Š.; Methodology, I.Š. and J.T.; Formal analysis, I.Š. and S.D.; investigation, I.Š. and H.L.; Resources, I.Š.; Data curation, I.Š., S.D. and H.L.; Writing—original draft preparation, I.Š.; Writing—review and editing, I.Š., J.T., S.D. and H.L.; Visualization, I.Š.; Project administration, I.Š.; Funding acquisition, I.Š. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by a grant from the Croatian Ministry of Science and Education and dedicated to multi-year institutional financing of scientific activity at the Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia, grant number IP8-FDMZ-2020 and IP6-FMDZ-2021.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the study’s design; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Škrlec, I.; Milić, J.; Heffer, M.; Peterlin, B.; Wagner, J. Genetic variations in circadian rhythm genes and susceptibility for myocardial infarction. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2018, 41, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thosar, S.S.; Butler, M.P.; Shea, S.A. Role of the circadian system in cardiovascular disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 2157–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Škrlec, I. Circadian rhythm and myocardial infarction. Med. Flum. 2019, 55, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Crnko, S.; Du Pré, B.C.; Sluijter, J.P.G.G.; Van Laake, L.W. Circadian rhythms and the molecular clock in cardiovascular biology and disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2019, 16, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Škrlec, I.; Milić, J.; Heffer, M.; Wagner, J.; Peterlin, B. Circadian clock genes and circadian phenotypes in patients with myocardial infarction. Adv. Med. Sci. 2019, 64, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, E.M.; Carter, A.M.; Grant, P.J. Association between polymorphisms in the Clock gene, obesity and the metabolic syndrome in man. Int. J. Obes. 2008, 32, 658–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Škrlec, I.; Milić, J.; Cilenšek, I.; Petrovič, D.; Wagner, J.; Peterlin, B. Circadian clock genes and myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Gene 2019, 701, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorokhova, S.G.; Generozov, E.V.; Yu, A.O.; Muraseeva, E.V.; Naumov, V.A.; Babikova, E.A.; Zaharczevskaya, N.B.; Prigorovskaya, T.S. Different association of CRY1 and CLOCK circadian genes with coronary atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Exp. Cardiol. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corella, D.; Asensio, E.M.; Coltell, O.; Sorlí, J.V.; Estruch, R.; Martínez-González, M.Á.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Castañer, O.; Arós, F.; Lapetra, J.; et al. CLOCK gene variation is associated with incidence of type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases in type-2 diabetic subjects: Dietary modulation in the PREDIMED randomized trial. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2016, 15, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sookoian, S.; Gemma, C.; Gianotti, T.F.; Burgueño, A.; Castaño, G.; Pirola, C.J. Genetic variants of Clock transcription factor are associated with individual susceptibility to obesity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 1606–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Škrlec, I.; Milić, J.; Steiner, R. The Impact of the Circadian Genes CLOCK and ARNTL on Myocardial Infarction. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Monteleone, P.; Tortorella, A.; Docimo, L.; Maldonato, M.N.; Canestrelli, B.; De Luca, L.; Maj, M. Investigation of 3111T/C polymorphism of the CLOCK gene in obese individuals with or without binge eating disorder: Association with higher body mass index. Neurosci. Lett. 2008, 435, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Galbete, C.; Contreras, R.; Martínez, J.A.; Martínez-González, M.Á.; Guillén-Grima, F.; Marti, A. Physical activity and sex modulate obesity risk linked to 3111T/C gene variant of the clock gene in an elderly population: The sun project. Chronobiol. Int. 2012, 29, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kolomeichuk, S.N.; Kurbatova, I.V.; Topchieva, L.V.; Korneva, V.A.; Poltorak, A.N.; Chambers, T.C.; Nemova, N.N. Association between CLOCK genetic variants and individual susceptibility to essential hypertension and coronary artery disease in Russian population. Exp. Clin. Cardiol. 2014, 20, 1798–1813. [Google Scholar]
- Li, G.Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, H. Association of insulin resistance with polymorphic variants of Clock and Bmal1 genes: A case–control study. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 2020, 42, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Herzog, R.; Álvarez-Pasquin, M.J.; Díaz, C.; Del Barrio, J.L.; Estrada, J.M.; Gil, Á. Are healthcare workers intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kolomeichuk, S.N.; Makeeva, I.V.V.; Topchieva, L.V.V.; Korneva, V.A.A.; Nemova, N.N.N.; Kolomeĭchuk, S.N.; Makeeva, I.V.V.; Topchieva, L.V.V.; Korneva, V.A.A.; Nemova, N.N.N. Association of T3111C polymorphism in 3’-untranslated region of the Clock gene with the risk of essential arterial hypertension and coronary artery disease in the Russian population (Residents of Karelia). Russ. J. Genet. 2011, 47, 1256–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram showing the exclusion and inclusion criteria and the number of studies eliminated and incorporated at each step of the database search.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram showing the exclusion and inclusion criteria and the number of studies eliminated and incorporated at each step of the database search.
Figure 2.
Funnel plot showing the log odds ratio versus standard error. There is no indication of publication bias (p = 0.17).
Figure 2.
Funnel plot showing the log odds ratio versus standard error. There is no indication of publication bias (p = 0.17).
Figure 3.
Forest plot for the association between T3111C polymorphism and cardiovascular diseases.
Figure 4.
Forest plots for the association between T3111C polymorphism and (A) hypertension risk and (B) obesity risk.
Figure 4.
Forest plots for the association between T3111C polymorphism and (A) hypertension risk and (B) obesity risk.
Table 1.
Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.
| First Author | Monteleone et al. | Galbete et al. | Kolomeichuk et al. | Kolomeichuk et al. | Li et al. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2008 [12] | 2012 [13] | 2014a [14] | 2014b [14] | 2020 [15] |
| Country | Italy | Spain | Russia | Russia | China |
| Ethnicity | Caucasian | Caucasian | Caucasian | Caucasian | Asian |
| Disorder | Obesity | Obesity | Hypertension | Coronary artery disease | Hypertension/insulin resistance |
| Population type | General | General | Hospital | Hospital | Hospital |
| Study type | Case-control | Cross-sectional | Cross-sectional | Cross-sectional | Cross-sectional |
| Case | 192 | 532 | 434 | 299 | 103 |
| Control | 92 | 371 | 435 | 434 | 231 |
| Male (%) | 14.79% | 72.76% | 48.33% | 49.11% | 57.78% |
| Age (year ± SD) cases | 38.4 ± 10.9 | 69 ± 5 | 51.9 ± 6.9 | 52.3 ± 7.1 | 54 ± 13.81 |
| Age (year ± SD) control | 26.1 ± 4.6 | 69 ± 5 | 50.8 ± 8.1 | 50.8 ± 8.1 | 53.1 ± 11.27 |
| Genotyping method | RFLP-PCR | RT-PCR | RFLP-PCR | RFLP-PCR | PCR sequencing |
| NOS score * | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
* NOS score: Newcastle–Ottava quality assessment scale.
Table 2.
The genotypes and allele distribution of the CLOCK T3111C polymorphism in each incorporated study in the present meta-analysis.
Table 2.
The genotypes and allele distribution of the CLOCK T3111C polymorphism in each incorporated study in the present meta-analysis.
| First Author | Cases | Controls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype Frequencies, N (%) | Allele Frequencies, N (%) | Genotype Frequencies, N (%) | Allele Frequencies, N (%) | |||||||
| TT | TC | CC | T | C | TT | TC | CC | T | C | |
| Monteleone et al. | 103 (53.6) | 68 (35.4) | 21 (10.9) | 272 (70.8) | 112 (29.1) | 46 (50) | 39 (42.4) | 7 (7.6) | 131 (71.2) | 53 (28.8) |
| Galbete et al. | 278 (52.2) | 217 (40.8) | 37 (7) | 789 (72.7) | 297 (27.3) | 181 (48.8) | 151 (41.5) | 36 (9.7) | 516 (69.5) | 226 (30.5) |
| Kolomeichuk et al. a | 143 (33) | 213 (49) | 78 (18) | 252 (58.1) | 182 (41.9) | 209 (48) | 187 (43) | 39 (9) | 300 (69) | 135 (31) |
| Kolomeichuk et al. b | 81 (27) | 161 (54) | 57 (19) | 162 (53.8) | 137 (46.2) | 209 (48) | 187 (43) | 39 (9) | 300 (69) | 135 (31) |
| Li et al. | 51 (49.5) | 44 (42.7) | 8 (7.8) | 146 (70.9) | 60 (29.1) | 186 (80.5) | 40 (17.3) | 5 (2.2) | 412 (89.2) | 50 (10.8) |
Table 3.
Meta-analysis results of the CLOCK T3111C polymorphism and risk of CVDs.
| Comparison | Test of Association | Test of Heterogeneity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p | I2 | p | ||
| Allelic model | T vs. C | 0.73 (0.62–0.84) | <0.001 | 97.93 | <0.001 |
| Dominant model | TT + CT vs. CC | 0.59 (0.46–0.71) | <0.001 | 79.59 | 0.001 |
| Recessive model | TT vs. CT + CC | 0.63 (0.54–0.73) | <0.001 | 91.64 | <0.001 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Škrlec, I.; Talapko, J.; Džijan, S.; Lepeduš, H. The Association of Cardiovascular Disease with the T3111C Polymorphism in the CLOCK Gene. Med. Sci. Forum 2021, 6, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECMD2021-10314
AMA Style
Škrlec I, Talapko J, Džijan S, Lepeduš H. The Association of Cardiovascular Disease with the T3111C Polymorphism in the CLOCK Gene. Medical Sciences Forum. 2021; 6(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECMD2021-10314
Chicago/Turabian StyleŠkrlec, Ivana, Jasminka Talapko, Snježana Džijan, and Hrvoje Lepeduš. 2021. "The Association of Cardiovascular Disease with the T3111C Polymorphism in the CLOCK Gene" Medical Sciences Forum 6, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECMD2021-10314
