Next Article in Journal
Remote Sensing (NDVI) and Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity (ECap) to Delineate Different Zones in a Vineyard
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Intestinal Inflammatory Diseases on Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients with COVID-19
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Can Precision Agriculture Be Used in the Management of a Fe and Zn Biofortification Workflow in Organic Tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum L.)? †

by
Ana Rita F. Coelho
1,2,*,
Ana Coelho Marques
1,2,
Cláudia Campos Pessoa
1,2,
Diana Daccak
1,2,
Inês Carmo Luís
1,2,
João Caleiro
1,
Maria Brito
1,2,
José Kullberg
1,2,
Maria Manuela Silva
2,3,
Manuela Simões
1,2,
Fernando H. Reboredo
1,2,
Maria F. Pessoa
1,2,
Paulo Legoinha
1,2,
Maria J. Silva
2,4,
Ana P. Rodrigues
4,
José C. Ramalho
2,4,
Paula Scotti-Campos
2,5,
José N. Semedo
2,5,
Isabel P. Pais
2,5 and
Fernando C. Lidon
1,2
1
Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
2
GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
3
ESEAG-COAF, Avenida do Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal
4
PlantStress & Biodiversity Lab, Centro de Estudos Florestais, Instituto Superior Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, 2784-505 Oeiras, Portugal
5
INIAV, Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Agronomy, 3–17 May 2021; Available online: https://sciforum.net/conference/IECAG2021.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 3(1), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09662
Published: 30 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Agronomy)

Abstract

:
It is expected that the population worldwide might exceed 9 billion by 2050, therefore it being imperative to increase food production. As such, the development of smart farming technology is an important key food production issue. In fact, through the use of UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles), it is possible to create normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) maps, that can indicate factors, such as health and vegetation vigor. In this context, this study aimed to assess the state of three tomato varieties (beef heart, “chucha”, and apple) in the framework of a biofortification workflow with Fe and Zn, following an organic production mode. In a tomato experimental production field (GPS coordinates—39°41′48.517″ N; 8°35′45.524″ W), six foliar sprayings were carried out during the production cycle, with a mix of Zitrilon (15%) (0.40 and 1.20 kg·ha−1) and Maxiblend (1 and 4 kg·ha−1). NDVI was determined 7 days before the first foliar spraying and showed a maximum of 0.86 (on a scale from −1 to 1). After the 3rd foliar spraying, no changes were detected in the color of freshly harvest tomatoes (assessed through spectrophotometric colorimeter), but an increase of Fe and Zn content was found in the leaves, and of Zn in tomatoes themselves (except in “chucha” variety). The use of precision agriculture techniques in correlation with the other analyses is discussed.

1. Introduction

The worldwide population is expected to exceed the 9 billion by 2050 [1], and, as such, food productions must increase by 25–70% to be able to feed the future world population [2]. Agriculture has changed over the years, and the digital era today is considered the future of this sector. In fact, the development of smart farming technology has afforded the ability to continuously monitor the states of plants, soils, and the needs for productions inputs (such as water) [3], thus being an important tool for food production. UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) are being used in monitoring and measuring bio-physical parameters [4]. Nevertheless, through the data obtained by UAVs, it is possible to create NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) maps (ranging from −1 to 1) [5], thus being one of the most used and implemented calculated indices. This type of index can characterize health and vegetation vigor [6].
The lack of essential nutrients, such as Fe and Zn, in human diets is a current global problem [7], which can lead to the development of several pathologies, namely anemia (for Fe deficiency) [8] or problems related to the immune system, gastrointestinal, central nervous, and reproductive system (for Zn deficiency) [9].
Zinc supports normal growth and development during different stages of life (mainly during pregnancy, childhood, and adolescence). In fact, the daily adequate intake for pregnant and lactating women ranges between 11–13 mg; from birth to 8 years, it varies between 2–5 mg; and, for individuals from 9 years of age or older, the daily dose varies between 8–11 mg (dependent upon gender) [10]. On the other hand, Fe is an essential component of hemoglobin, supports muscle metabolism, and plays an essential role in physical growth and cellular functioning. Iron daily adequate intake varies between males, females, those who are pregnant, and those who are lactating, thus large quantities being needed during pregnancy (27 mg) [11]. As such, since edible agriculture products are the main source of minerals [12], biofortification has been carried out over the years, aiming to attain biofortified food crops [13], where contents of target minerals increase in the edible part of plants.
The tomato is considered one of the most popular and widely consumed vegetables worldwide [14]; thus, organic food consumption worldwide continues to grow, and organic produce counts on a growing market [15]. Furthermore, the restriction of applied products for pest and disease control [16] implies a more accurate monitorization of crops to avoid total losses. In this context, this study aimed to assess, through precision agriculture, the state of three tomato varieties (beef heart, “chucha”, and apple) biofortified with Fe and Zn, following an organic production mode.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biofortification Itinerary

The experimental tomato-growing field, located in Western Portugal (39°41′48.517″ N; 8°35′45.524″ W), was used to growth three tomato varieties (beef heart, “chucha”, and apple) (Lycopersicum esculentum L.), following an organic production mode. During the agricultural period, from 22 May (planting date) to 3 September of 2020 (harvest date), air temperatures reached an average daily of 30.6 and 13.3 °C (with minimum and maximum values varying between 5.3 and 40.6 °C, respectively). Foliar spraying with Fe and Zn was carried out with two treatments during the production cycle, with six foliar sprays (with 10–11 days interval). Treatments were carried out with a mix of two products (Zitrilon, 15%, and Maxiblend), in which treatment 1 (T1) corresponds to a mix of 0.40 kg·ha−1 Zitrilon (15%) and 1 kg·ha−1 Maxiblend and treatment 2 (T2) corresponds to a mix of 1.20 kg·ha−1 Zitrilon (15%) and 4 kg·ha−1 Maxiblend. Control plants were not sprayed at any time with Fe and Zn. Each treatment was performed in quadruplicate.

2.2. NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) in the Experimental Field

The experimental field was flown over once with a UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle), equipped with altimetric measurement sensors and synchronized by GPS. The flight was performed on 26 June (seven days before the 1st foliar spraying) to characterize vegetation indexes and to monitor differences in vigor between control and sprayed plants. The images were processed in ArcGIS Pro, and the NDVI maps were obtained.

2.3. Iron and Zinc Contents in Leaves and Zinc Content in Tomatoes

Iron and Zinc contents in leaves and Zn content in tomatoes were determined after the 3rd foliar spraying (23 July), after being cut, dried (at 60 °C, until constant weight), and grounded, using a XRF analyzer (model XL3t 950 He GOLDD+) under He atmosphere, according to Reference [17].

2.4. Colorimetric Parameters

Colorimetric parameters were determined in fresh tomatoes per treatment with a scanning spectrophotometric colorimeter, according to Reference [18]. Measurements were carried out in quadruplicate.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using a One-Way ANOVA to assess differences among treatments in cv. Picasso, followed by a Tukey’s for mean comparison. A 95% confidence level was adopted for all tests.

3. Results

Concerning the management of Fe and Zn biofortification workflow in organic tomatoes, the NDVI map was obtained 7 days after the 1st foliar spraying (Figure 1), with the aim of verifying if the culture was in good health conditions to be biofortified. In fact, the NDVI map ranged between 0.19 and 0.86, corresponding with the lower NDVI in the soil, since the tomatoes plants were in an early vegetative state.
Nevertheless, from the NDVI map, the minimum, maximum, and average of NDVI was calculated (Table 1). As such, the average of NDVI was 0.44 at 7 days before the 1st foliar spraying with Fe and Zn.
The colorimetric analysis of tomatoes after the 3rd foliar spraying with Fe and Zn showed the highest value at 650 nm, which corresponds to the red color (Figure 2). Only T2 treatment of the apple variety showed higher transmittance compared to the control and T1 treatment.
Mineral content of leaves and tomatoes was assessed after the 3rd foliar spraying (Table 2). Relative to the control leaves, T2 showed the highest content of Fe and Zn, followed by T1 in “chucha” and apple varieties. However, in the beef heart variety, the Zn content in the leaves only showed a higher content than the control in T2 treatment. In the apple variety, the Zn content in the tomatoes was significantly higher in T2 treatment. Yet, in the beef heart variety, all the treatments with Fe and Zn showed higher content than the control, although T1 showed a significantly higher content of Zn compared to T2. At this stage of the biofortification process, the “chucha” variety did not show a higher content of Zn compared to the control tomatoes.

4. Discussion

Organic production uses lower levels of pesticides [16], thus it being important to monitor the culture. As such, before implementation of the biofortification workflow, it was necessary to ensure the best conditions of the culture. The average of NDVI was 0.44, and the maximum was 0.86 (Figure 1; Table 1). Regarding the average of NDVI, moderate values (between 0.2 to 0.5) were found [5], corresponding to the early vegetative state of tomato plants and the spacing between plants. Additionally, the maximum NDVI of the culture was 0.86, corresponding to high values (i.e., varying between 0.6 to 0.9) [5]. As such, the use of this parameter in the culture revealed that the culture had a healthy phenological development, allowing the implementation of the biofortification workflow.
In the middle of the biofortification workflow (after the 3rd foliar spraying with Fe and Zn), the color of the tomatoes (control and sprayed with Fe and Zn—T1 and T2) was assessed (Figure 2). All the treatments of the three varieties showed a highest value at 650 nm, corresponding to the red color [18] and, thus, being an indicator of high lycopene content [19]. Therefore, the use of this technology allowed an objective definition of the maturation state of the fruits, since red is an indication of 10 times more lycopene content than yellow [20].
Nevertheless, the mineral content of the leaves, after the 3rd foliar spraying (Table 2), pointed to the fact that, after foliar spraying, the “chucha” and apple varieties became biofortified with Fe and Zn (relative to the control, revealing a higher content in T2, followed by T1). However, in the beef heart variety, Zn content only revealed higher content than the control T2, which may be due to the heterogeneity during foliar spraying or because the accumulation of minerals varies depending on the genotype [20].
Despite the heterogeneity of tomato genotypes, it is crucial to increase the contents of healthy compounds in the fruits [20]. In this context, it was found that, in the middle of the implementation of the biofortification workflow, Fe content was under the limits of detection, whereas Zn content revealed different accumulation patterns (Table 2). The apple variety, relative to the control, only showed a significantly higher content of Zn in T2, whereas beef heart revealed significantly higher contents of Zn in T1 and T2 (Table 2). Moreover, the “chucha” variety at this stage of the biofortification process did not reveal a biofortification pattern; nevertheless, it should be noted that Zn contents in tomatoes can be dependent of the maturation of the fruit and the variety [21].

5. Conclusions

Through the use of cameras, coupled to UAV, it was possible to obtain NDVI values and assess the vegetative stage of the different varieties of the tomato culture before the implementation of the biofortification workflow. In fact, the use of smart farm techniques, before biofortification, can help in the management of the culture and decision-making in real time, namely by assessing the organic culture’s health before foliar spraying.
Considering this technical workflow of foliar spraying with Fe and Zn in an organic production mode, it was observed that the content of these minerals in leaves and fruits varied among tomato varieties. The apple variety showed better content relative to beef heart and “chucha” varieties. Nevertheless, foliar spraying with Fe and Zn can increase these chemical elements in tomato leaves and fruits (without major changes in the color of fruits).

Supplementary Materials

The poster presentation is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IECAG2021-09662/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R.F.C. and F.C.L.; methodology, J.C., M.B. and J.K.; software, J.C., M.B., J.K.; validation, F.C.L.; Formal analysis, A.R.F.C., A.C.M., C.C.P., D.D. and I.C.L.; investigation, A.R.F.C., A.C.M., C.C.P., D.D. and I.C.L.; resources, M.M.S., M.S., F.H.R., M.F.P., P.L., M.J.S., A.P.R., J.C.R., P.S.-C., J.N.S. and I.P.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.F.C., A.C.M. and F.C.L.; writing—review and editing, F.C.L.; supervision, F.C.L.; project administration, F.C.L.; funding acquisition, F.C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by PDR2020, grant number 101-030701.

Acknowledgments

The authors thanks to Eng. Ana Rita Marques (Quinta do Montalto) for technical assistance in the agricultural parcel, as well as to project PDR2020-101-030701, for the financial support. We also thanks to the Research centers (GeoBioTec) UIDB/04035/2020, and (CEF) UIDB/00239/2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alexandratos, N.; Bruinsma, J. World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision. Agricultural Development Economics Division. 2012. Available online: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/esa/Global_persepctives/world_ag_2030_50_2012_rev.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  2. Hunter, M.C.; Smith, R.G.; Schipanski, M.E.; Atwood, L.W.; Mortensen, D.A. Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. BioScience 2017, 67, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Walter, A.; Finger, R.; Huber, R.; Buchmann, N. Opinion: Smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 6148–6150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Senthilnath, J.; Dokania, A.; Kandukuri, M.; Ramesh, K.N.; Anand, G.; Omkar, S.N. Detection of tomatoes using spectral-spatial methods in remotely sensed RGB images captured by UAV. Biosyst. Eng. 2016, 146, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/eros/phenology/science/ndvi-foundation-remote-sensing-phenology?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects (accessed on 24 March 2021).
  6. Xue, J.; Su, B. Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: A review of developments and applications. J. Sens. 2017, 1, 1353691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Li, H.; Lian, C.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, X.; Zhang, Y. Agro-biofortification of iron and zinc in edible portion of crops for the global south. Adv. Plant Agric. Res. 2017, 6, 52–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Abbaspour, N.; Hurrell, R.; Kelishadi, R. Review on iron and its importance for human health. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2014, 19, 164. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Roohani, N.; Hurrell, R.; Kelishadi, R.; Schulin, R. Zinc and its importance for human health: An integrative review. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2013, 18, 144–157. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Available online: https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Zinc-HealthProfessional/ (accessed on 24 March 2021).
  11. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Available online: https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Iron-HealthProfessional/ (accessed on 24 March 2021).
  12. Wang, Z.; Hassan, M.U.; Nadeen, F.; Wu, L.; Zhang, F.; Li, X. Magnesium fertilization improves crop yield in most production systems: A meta-analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Alshaal, T.; El-Ramady, H. Foliar application: From plant nutrition to biofortification. Environ. Biodivers. Soil Secur. 2017, 1, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sainju, U.M.; Dris, R.; Singh, B. Mineral nutrition of tomato. Food Agric. Environ. 2003, 1, 176–183. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rizzo, G.; Borrello, M.; Dara Guccione, G.; Schifani, G.; Cembalo, L. Organic food consumption: The relevance of the health attribute. Sustainability 2020, 12, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. HelpGuide. Available online: https://www.helpguide.org/articles/healthy-eating/organic-foods.htm (accessed on 24 March 2021).
  17. Luís, I.C.; Lidon, F.C.; Pessoa, C.C.; Marques, A.C.; Coelho, A.R.F.; Simões, M.; Patanita, M.; Dôres, J.; Ramalho, J.C.; Silva, M.M.; et al. Zinc enrichment in two contrasting genotypes of Triticum aestivum L grains: Interactions between edaphic conditions and foliar fertilizers. Plants 2021, 10, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Coelho, A.; Pessoa, C.; Marques, A.; Luís, I.; Daccak, D.; Manuela, M.; Reboredo, F.; Pessoa, M.; Galhano, C.; Legoinha, P.; et al. Nutrient interactions in natural fortification of tomato with Mg: An analytical perspective. Biol. Life Sci. Forum. 2020, 4, 8724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jarquín-Enríquez, L.; Mercado-Silva, E.M.; Maldonado, J.L.; Lopez-Baltazar, J. Lycopene content and color index of tomatoes are affected by the greenhouse cover. Sci. Hortic. Amst. 2013, 155, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dorais, M.; Ehret, D.L.; Papadopoulos, A.P. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) health components: From the seed to the consumer. Phytoch. Rev. 2008, 7, 231–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Costa, F.; de Lurdes Baeta, M.; Saraiva, D.; Veríssimo, M.T.; Ramos, F. Evolution of mineral contents in tomato fruits during the ripening process after harvest. Food Anal. Method 2011, 4, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) map in plants of Lycopersicum esculentum L. (considering the three varieties), 7 days before the 1st foliar spraying with Fe and Zn.
Figure 1. NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) map in plants of Lycopersicum esculentum L. (considering the three varieties), 7 days before the 1st foliar spraying with Fe and Zn.
Blsf 03 00041 g001
Figure 2. Visible spectra showing the average of transmittance (n = 4) in tomatoes of Lycopersicum esculentum L. of the three varieties, after the 3rd foliar spraying (Control, T1, and T2).
Figure 2. Visible spectra showing the average of transmittance (n = 4) in tomatoes of Lycopersicum esculentum L. of the three varieties, after the 3rd foliar spraying (Control, T1, and T2).
Blsf 03 00041 g002
Table 1. NDVI ((Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) of the three varieties of Lycopersicum esculentum L. (obtained on 26 June 2020), at 7 days before the 1st foliar spraying with Fe and Zn.
Table 1. NDVI ((Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) of the three varieties of Lycopersicum esculentum L. (obtained on 26 June 2020), at 7 days before the 1st foliar spraying with Fe and Zn.
Minimum NDVIMaximum NDVI Average NDVI SD
0.190.860.440.15
Table 2. Mean values ± S.E. (n = 4) of Fe and Zn in leaves and Zn in tomatoes of Lycopersicum esculentum L. (beef heart, “chucha”, and apple), after the 3rd foliar spraying.
Table 2. Mean values ± S.E. (n = 4) of Fe and Zn in leaves and Zn in tomatoes of Lycopersicum esculentum L. (beef heart, “chucha”, and apple), after the 3rd foliar spraying.
LeavesFruits
VarietyTreatmentsFe (ppm)Zn (ppm)Zn (ppm)
Beef heartControl<5074.92b ± 1.7938.59c ± 0.43
T1<5062.29c ± 3.9777.16a ± 0.18
T2<50200.8a ± 1.9663.12b ± 1.57
“Chucha”Control<5061.67c ± 0.9930.30a ± 1.98
T1140.2b ± 7.94140.0b ± 3.1428.76a ± 1.32
T2255.0a ± 10.5167.0a± 2.2613.71b ± 0.86
AppleControl73.90c ± 10.454.23c ± 0.7030.35b ± 2.71
T1113.7b ± 3.84121.7b ± 1.6433.27b ± 1.43
T2273.9a ± 8.55285.3a ± 2.5764.32a ± 1.64
Different letters indicate significant differences, of each variety, between treatments (statistical analysis using the single factor ANOVA test, p ≤ 0.05). Foliar spray was carried out with two concentrations (T1 and T2). Control was not sprayed.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Coelho, A.R.F.; Marques, A.C.; Pessoa, C.C.; Daccak, D.; Luís, I.C.; Caleiro, J.; Brito, M.; Kullberg, J.; Silva, M.M.; Simões, M.; et al. Can Precision Agriculture Be Used in the Management of a Fe and Zn Biofortification Workflow in Organic Tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum L.)? Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 3, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09662

AMA Style

Coelho ARF, Marques AC, Pessoa CC, Daccak D, Luís IC, Caleiro J, Brito M, Kullberg J, Silva MM, Simões M, et al. Can Precision Agriculture Be Used in the Management of a Fe and Zn Biofortification Workflow in Organic Tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum L.)? Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 3(1):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09662

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coelho, Ana Rita F., Ana Coelho Marques, Cláudia Campos Pessoa, Diana Daccak, Inês Carmo Luís, João Caleiro, Maria Brito, José Kullberg, Maria Manuela Silva, Manuela Simões, and et al. 2021. "Can Precision Agriculture Be Used in the Management of a Fe and Zn Biofortification Workflow in Organic Tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum L.)?" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 3, no. 1: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09662

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop