Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Potential of Mitotic Kinases’ Inhibitors in Cancers of the Gastrointestinal System
Previous Article in Journal
In Silico ADME Profiling of Salubrinal and Its Analogues
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Future Pharmacology
Volume 2
Issue 3
10.3390/futurepharmacol2030014
futurepharmacol-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Lactic Acid in the Management of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Literature Review

by
Werner Mendling
1,
Maged Atef El Shazly
2 and
Lei Zhang
2,*
1
German Center for Infections in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Heusnerstrasse 40, D-42283 Wuppertal, Germany
2
Bayer Consumer Care AG, Peter Merian-Strasse 84, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Future Pharmacol. 2022, 2(3), 198-213; https://doi.org/10.3390/futurepharmacol2030014
Submission received: 1 April 2022 / Revised: 17 June 2022 / Accepted: 22 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common infection characterized by an imbalance in the vaginal microbiome. Alongside the extensive research for effective therapies, treatment recommendations for symptomatic BV with antibiotics have been developed and are currently available. However, the recurrence of BV remains a considerable challenge given that about 60% of women experience BV relapse within six months after initial treatment. In addition, clear guidelines on the treatment of asymptomatic BV during pregnancy or for BV mixed infections are still missing. Lactic acid has been put forward as a potential treatment or for prophylaxis of BV due to its ability to restore the imbalance of the vaginal microbiota and to promote the disruption of vaginal pathogenic bacterial biofilms, which might trigger BV recurrence. This review evaluates the clinical evidence regarding the efficacy and prophylactic potential of lactic acid in BV through a systematic literature search. In addition, a treatment regimen consisting of lactic acid as a standalone treatment or in combination with current recommended therapies for practice is suggested based on these findings and stratified according to BV severity, pregnancy status, and coincidence with vulvovaginal candidosis (VVC) or trichomoniasis.

1. Introduction

Over 560 bacterial species have been identified in the vaginal microbiota by genomic sequencing [1,2]. Usually, the healthy vaginal microbiota is dominated by lactobacilli which provide support in the defense against dysbiosis and infections [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Disruption of the vaginal microbiota balance can result in the development of bacterial vaginosis (BV), a common dysbiosis of the lower genital tract affecting about one third of women of reproductive age in the United States [9,10,11]. Although the exact cause of BV is still unknown, the disease is defined by a replacement of lactic acid-producing lactobacilli with overgrowth of several strains of anaerobic bacteria [12,13,14,15]. Moreover, a critical mixture of BV-associated bacteria in combination with the presence of certain lactobacilli species seems to be implicated in the development of BV and the development of polybacterial biofilms [16,17]. The prevalence of BV varies with race and ethnicity, and occurs more frequently in women that have sex with other women, have a new or higher number of male sex partners, smoke, douche, use hormonal contraceptives, or are subjected to chronic stress [18,19]. As such, BV prevalence in black and Hispanic women within North America is significantly higher (33% and 31%, respectively) compared with white (23%) and Asian (11%) racial groups [20,21,22]. The economic burden of symptomatic BV is therefore high and has been estimated to cost USD 4.8 billion annually [20].
Up to 50% of women with BV feel asymptomatic, while common symptoms in cases of symptomatic BV include an elevated vaginal pH, grey-white milky vaginal discharge, itching, and a “fishy” odor [23,24,25,26]. Aside from the evaluation of clinical symptoms, the gold standard for the confirmation of BV diagnosis is the Nugent score [27,28]. However, traditional assessment using Nugent scoring typically requires more time, resources, and expertise, which can impact its use in a clinical setting [9]. The preferred alternative in practice is the Amsel scoring or a gram stain [23,29,30]. The Amsel scoring system is simple to use and is based on four predefined criteria: (I) the presence of homogeneous, thin, greyish white vaginal discharge, (II) a vaginal pH over 4.5, (III) a positive whiff-amine test, and (IV) >20% clue cells/high power field on a wet mount of vaginal secretions. Yet important diagnostic tools for BV are the phase contrast microscope and a trained user [31,32].
A proper diagnosis of BV is of clinical relevance, since these infections enable the transmission of sexually transmittable infections, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2), and can cause preterm birth and miscarriage in pregnant women [9,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Over the last decades, several treatments have been developed, and therapy guidelines of BV treatment are now publicly available [40,41]. However, despite these treatment guidelines, recurrence rates of BV remain high, as illustrated by 30% recurrence after 3 months or 60% after 6 months [3,42,43]. The formation of biofilms might be partially responsible for this phenomenon, as recommended antibiotic therapy with oral or vaginal metronidazole or clindamycin are not able to destroy these [3,17,40,44]. The antiseptic dequalinium chloride, which is also recommended in the World Health Organization/International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (WHO/IUSTI) guideline, can dissolve BV-associated Gardnerella biofilms only in vitro [41,45]. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that treatment with metronidazole does not result in restoration of the healthy vaginal microbiota [46]. Therefore, additional therapies and prophylactic treatments after initial therapy, such as probiotics, pH-regulating products, and vaginal or oral lactobacilli, are desired to control maintenance of the healthy vaginal microbiota [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54].
Among these additional therapies, lactic acid has been put forward as a potential candidate for the prophylaxis and treatment of BV [55]. Lactic acid, in combination with hydrogen peroxide, bacteriocins, antiadhesive molecules, and cytokines, is mainly produced by lactobacilli in the healthy vagina and protects the vaginal microbiota against BV-associated bacterial strains [56,57,58,59]. In addition, lactic acid has virucidal properties and is able to kill C. trachomatis [60,61,62,63].
In this review article, the efficacy and prophylactic potential of lactic acid as a standalone treatment or in combination with antibiotics as a therapy for BV is systematically reviewed. In addition, recommendations for BV treatment according to specific patient groups, stratifying between first-time BV, recurrent BV, pregnant with BV, planning pregnancy, or in mixed BV infections, have been proposed. There is a specific focus on mixed infections, since no recommendations are available for this patient population.

2. Methods

An electronic, systematic literature review was conducted by consulting the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases from inception until 7 May 2021 by 1 reviewer, and was independently verified by the authors. Various combinations of terms were queried, including “bacterial vaginosis”, “non-specific vaginitis”, “vaginal bacteriosis”, “mixed infections”, “lactic acid”, and “lactate gel”. Articles were considered eligible if they assessed vaginal lactic acid-containing products as a standalone treatment for BV or in combination with antibiotics, preferably in comparison to placebo or standard of care. Inclusion of articles in the current review were restricted to clinical trials that studied the efficacy of lactic acid in BV. Study populations with first time and recurrent BV, as well as pregnant study populations, were included in the review. Only English-written articles were considered. Additionally, relevant references cited in the primary studies were tracked. There were no size or date restrictions. Studies were excluded if they were performed on animals or if they included treatment with lactic acid producing bacteria. Unpublished studies, reviews, and case studies were not reviewed.

3. Results

In total, 213 results were retrieved from the literature search, of which 51 abstracts fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria and were further evaluated. Based on the abstracts, 12 full text articles were then reviewed for eligibility, of which 7 fulfilled the predefined criteria to assess the efficacy of lactic acid in the prophylaxis and treatment of BV. Figure 1 depicts a PRISMA flow diagram describing the literature search and article selection process. The main reasons for article exclusion after fulfillment of the inclusion criteria were endpoints not being related to efficacy of lactic acid [64], involvement of treatment with Lactobacillus spp. as a means to increase vaginal lactic acid concentration [65], or focus on changes in the vaginal microbiota [66,67], which are beyond the scope of the current review. One study would have qualified to be included in this assessment but was still in progress with no efficacy results published at the time the literature search was performed [29].
Of the seven selected clinical study publications, five evaluations studied the effect of lactic acid in symptomatic BV in comparison to the recommended treatment with antibiotics (Table 1). One study focused on treatment of recurrent BV, and one evaluated the use of lactic acid in symptomatic pregnant women. All but the final study were designed as randomized controlled trials.

3.1. Clinical Evaluation of Lactic Acid in Symptomatic BV

The potential of vaginally applied lactic acid to treat BV has been studied since 1986. In one study, Andersch et al. randomized 104 women with BV who received either one nightly intervaginal dose of lactate gel or a comparator treatment with 500 mg oral metronidazole twice daily for 7 days [74]. One week after treatment initiation, lactate gel demonstrated equal efficacy in comparison to treatment with metronidazole as demonstrated by an Amsel score of ≤2 out of 3. No adverse events were reported.
Another study compared the efficacy of intravaginal lactic acid with oral metronidazole (500 mg, twice daily, 7 days) and a placebo-treated group at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months after treatment initiation [68]. Two weeks after treatment, 49% of the lactic acid-treated study group presented an Amsel scoring ≤2, in comparison to 83% of the metronidazole and 47% of the placebo-treated group. The median duration for curative results was 21 days in the comparator metronidazole-treated population, where complete disappearance of symptoms occurred in 50% with the lactic acid up to 90 days after treatment initiation. The authors reported no difference in adverse events between the three treatment groups.
Treatment of BV with 5 g of lactic acid vaginal gel at bedtime for 7 days, alone or in combination with 500 g oral metronidazole twice daily for 7 days, resulted in a significant increase in Lactobacillus spp. colony count after 2 weeks in comparison with metronidazole alone [69]. The clinical efficacy, as assessed by a decrease in vaginal pH, clue cells, and whiff test, was similarly efficient for the three treatment groups. Analysis of adverse events showed that women treated with metronidazole experienced minimal side effects, which were absent with lactic acid treatment.
Sustained-release oligomeric lactic acid pessary, in comparison with an untreated control group, has also been evaluated [70]. The study consisted of two parts: a two-week proof-of-concept evaluation and a one-week efficacy evaluation. The pessary was administered once or twice per week and showed an overall efficacy of 78% BV clearance after 1 week. Reported adverse events were mild and short-term.
In a randomized clinical trial, women with symptomatic BV as diagnosed by Amsel criteria and Nugent score, were evaluated [71]. Subjects were either allocated to receive treatment with daily Acidform gel or metronidazole intravaginal gel for five days. Approximately one week post-treatment, 23% of women who received Acidform and 88% of women treated with metronidazole were cured. According to Amsel criteria, 28 to 35 days after treatment initiation, the percentage of women cured decreased to 8% in the Acidform group and to 53% in the metronidazole-treated group. Four women receiving Acidform and one woman receiving metronidazole reported genital irritation.

3.2. Clinical Evaluation of Lactic Acid in Recurrent BV

Follow-up clinical evaluation was used to determine how the intermittent prophylactic use of vaginal lactate gel after initial treatment with lactic acid-containing gel resulted in 88% of BV symptom relief 6 months after treatment initiation [72]. This was significantly higher than the placebo-treated group, where only 10% of the population presented clinical improvement of BV symptoms. Although this was the only study with a specific focus on BV recurrences, it also reported long-term BV outcomes after initial treatment [68,71]. Recurrence rates of BV after metronidazole and lactic acid treatment were similar in comparison to the placebo-treated group at 3 months after treatment initiation [68]. In contrast, in comparison with intravaginal metronidazole treatment, a lower BV recurrence rate 1 month after lactic acid treatment was observed [71].

3.3. Clinical Evaluation of Lactic Acid in Symptomatic BV during Pregnancy

A positive change in the vaginal microbiota has been demonstrated starting from 2 days after treatment initiation with lactic acid in pregnant women with symptomatic BV [73]. After 1 week, 80% of the treated women were declared cured with the presence of a normal concentration of lactobacilli in the vaginal microbiota.

4. Discussion

Although local lactic acid has been demonstrated to exert beneficial effects through its capacity to destruct vaginal biofilms and restore vaginal microbiota in BV without causing systemic effects, use of lactic acid in the prophylaxis or treatment of BV is currently not included in treatment guidelines. Therefore, this review provides a summary of the current BV treatment guidelines and proposes additional treatment regimens based on clinical findings and according to predefined patient groups, differentiating between pregnancy status, BV recurrence rates, and presence of additional pathogens. In addition, the authors propose to not only determine the treatment on Amsel criteria, but also on Nugent scores or modern microbiome diagnostics.

4.1. BV in Nonpregnancy

4.1.1. First Time BV

To date, the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Sexually Transmitted Disease Treatment Guidelines recommend all symptomatic women with BV to be treated with antibiotics primarily to relieve vaginal symptoms and signs of infection [29]. The recommended treatment for symptomatic BV consists of oral metronidazole (500 mg, twice daily, 7 days or 2 g, 1–2 times per day in 48 h), vaginal metronidazole (500 g, 1–2 times, 7 days or once 2 g), clindamycin vaginal cream (2%, 7 days), or vaginal dequalinium chloride (10 mg, 6 days) [75]. It should be noted that over half of women with BV are reported to be asymptomatic, causing the debate as to whether or not treatment of this specific population should continue [8]. The main argument to treat asymptomatic BV might be because of its sexually transmittable characteristics and increased risks of postoperative infections or complications after gynaecological interventions, regardless of absence of symptoms [76,77,78,79].
Five clinical studies identified in the current systematic literature review evaluated the efficacy of lactic acid as a treatment of symptomatic BV. Lactic acid treatment resulted in similar cure rates when compared to metronidazole treatment [69,74], and the use of a pessary containing lactic acid was effective against BV in comparison to a placebo-treated group [70]. However, no increased cure rates were reported when patients were treated with lactic acid as compared to placebo, in contrast to metronidazole treatment, which showed a significantly higher cure rate [68,71].
The observation that the retrieved clinical studies do not reach a clear consensus on the use of lactic acid as a treatment and prophylaxis of BV might indicate that an alternative patient population stratification is desired. As such, a differentiation between patients with mild BV, here defined as developing BV with a pH value of 4.5 or 4.6 and microscopic presence of only few clue cells, and moderate to severe BV, characterized by a pH value ≥4.7 and abundance of clue cells, is proposed. Based on assessment of the available information, it is the authors’ proposal that subjects with mild BV could benefit from treatment with lactic acid alone through restoration of lactobacilli colonization and prevention or destruction of biofilm formation (Table 2) [56,57,58,80,81]. The use of lactic acid alone could provide required efficacy in this population, while avoiding systemic effects, side effects, and bacterial resistance associated with antibiotic use. As has been established, BV cannot be cured with lactic acid alone; however, the combination of currently recommended therapy with antibiotics and lactic acid should provide efficacious BV symptom relief and stimulate lactobacilli recolonization of the vaginal microbiota [68,69,71].

4.1.2. Recurrent BV

To date, recurrence rates of BV within a few months after initial treatment remain high [3,14,42,82,83]. The formation of biofilms, presence of residual infection, resistance because of poor treatment adherence, reinfection through intercourse, or the failure to restore protective vaginal lactobacilli populations have been identified as potential causative factors [17,84,85]. According to the current guidelines, recurrent BV is usually targeted through long-term weekly use of vaginal metronidazole for 4 to 6 months or by repeated cycles of oral metronidazole or tinidazole for 7 days upon BV recurrence.
Previous observations have shown that prophylactic use of lactic acid after initial BV treatment results in significant clinical improvement after 6 months in contrast to placebo treatment, with lower rates of BV recurrence [71,72]. Of note, although it is generally perceived that antibiotic therapy efficiently treats BV and prevents recurrences for a longer period of time, the use of lactic acid gel is preferred by patients as prophylactic treatment or in mild BV cases [29]. This is likely mainly due to the ease of use, lower frequency, and fewer side-effects for lactic acid therapy.
Treatment of recurrent BV with lactic acid in addition to the recommended guidelines with antibiotics is advised to promote prevention of BV recurrence and reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance (Table 2) [10,69,71].

4.2. BV in Pregnancy

The prevalence of BV in pregnant women varies significantly according to region, and is estimated to be 14% in a Canadian study [21,22,86,87,88]. The diagnosis of BV during pregnancy is clinically significant because of its association with several complications including preterm labor and delivery, late miscarriage, and postdelivery infections [89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97]. In addition, presence of sexually transmittable diseases, which can be increased through presence of BV, is also correlated with preterm delivery if it remains untreated [98,99].

4.2.1. Pregnant with BV

Oral BV treatment with antibiotics has not been associated with adverse foetal or obstetrical effects and is therefore recommended in pregnant women with symptomatic disease [93,100]. The CDC-recommended treatments include oral metronidazole (500 mg, twice daily, 7 days or 250 mg, 3 times per day, 7 days) or clindamycin (300 mg, twice daily, 7 days). In addition, the use of metronidazole for BV in this patient population should be only initiated if alternative treatment is inadequate [9].
As with BV in nonpregnancy, BV can also present asymptomatically in pregnant women. To date, controversy exists about whether treatment of asymptomatic BV during pregnancy decreases the risk for preterm delivery, maternal infections, and miscarriage despite its well-defined association with such risks [101,102,103]. However, recently published data suggest that treatment of BV should be carried out as soon as possible in early pregnancy, and preferably even before conception, since this would be more efficient in the prevention of preterm birth than treating BV which has become established during pregnancy [104].
Treatment of BV during pregnancy with lactic acid showed a positive change in the vaginal microbiota by restoring normal lactobacilli levels and vaginal acidity [73]. These findings promote the use of lactic acid as an additional therapy for BV during pregnancy on top of the recommended therapy with antibiotics, especially since risk factors for preterm delivery can be defined upfront, including race, ethnicity, an interpregnancy interval lower than 6 months, previous preterm births, age of the mother, and the nutritional status [105]. Despite remaining a topic of debate, it is proposed to also include pregnant women with asymptomatic BV and a high risk of preterm birth into the combined treatment group with antibiotics and lactic acid in order to avoid complications for the mother and foetus (Table 2).

4.2.2. Planning Pregnancy with Mild BV

To date, it is not current in practice to screen for BV in women planning pregnancy, and there are no recommendations for this patient group [106]. However, awareness of BV remains a crucial element in order to prevent potential BV complications during pregnancy. Therefore, given the beneficial effects of lactic acid, low associated risks, minimal side effects, high acceptance, and ease of use, treatment with lactic acid should be promoted in this population in case BV is suspected (Table 2).

4.3. Mixed Infections

In rare cases, BV can also coincide with vulvovaginal candidosis (VVC) or trichomoniasis, resulting in mixed vaginitis, a condition where both pathogens contribute to an abnormal vaginal milieu [107,108,109]. VVC is one of the most frequent vulvovaginal infections worldwide caused by the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans [110]. It is estimated that 70–75% of women experience VVC at least once in their lifetime and 40–50% will suffer from repeated episodes during their lifetime [111,112,113]. Coincidence of BV with VVC occurs in about 5% of vaginitis cases and is difficult to diagnose since a differentiation needs to be made between colonisation and infection by C. albicans [107,114,115]. In addition, clinical symptoms of BV and VVC can be similar, requiring a well-trained microscopic investigation together with a good anamnesis and clinical experience to accurately determine the diagnosis.
Trichomoniasis is caused by Trichomonas vaginalis and is the most prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted disease worldwide. Its prevalence varies geographically, ranging from 5.8% of all women in Europe to 20% and 22% in Africa and the Americas, respectively [116]. Mixed infections of BV and trichomoniasis are very rare, as illustrated by incidence rates of 0.8% in a general emergency department population [117]. However, in African American pregnant women, the incidence of BV together with trichomoniasis can reach 15% [118].
The diagnosis of a mixed infection is crucial in the treatment of the disease to initiate appropriate therapy, especially since the United States Food and Drug Administration does not permit drug combinations for the treatment of mixed infections in order to encourage physicians to reach a correct diagnosis and to treat precisely according to medical and ethical principles [107]. Since no guidelines are available for the treatment of mixed infections, the physician should consider from which of the two conditions the patient suffers the most and initiate treatment based on that. For example, patients will typically suffer more from symptoms associated with VVC, as often characterized by itching and soreness in the vestibulum, and trichomoniasis compared with BV-associated symptoms, such as fishy odor without signs of infection [110].
In case of mixed infections of BV with VVC or trichomoniasis, it is encouraged to focus first on the treatment of VVC with antimycotic treatments or on therapy against trichomoniasis by a single dose of oral metronidazole or tinidazole (Table 2). In the latter case, the antibiotic treatment will also affect BV. If symptoms persist, treatment of BV should be the secondary goal according to the treatment recommendations and stratified to BV severity and pregnancy status, and the combination of lactic acid as a standalone or in combination with antibiotic therapy should also be encouraged. It should also be emphasized that lactic acid has been demonstrated to have beneficial effects against VVC and trichomoniasis [35,65,119,120,121]. In case of VVC, this effect can be due to the increased solubility of clotrimazole and a higher sensibility of the pseudohyphae of C. albicans against clotrimazole due to their activated metabolisms in contrast to budding cells in the presence of lactic acid [122]. These arguments led to the combination of clotrimazole 500 mg vaginal tablets with lactic acid [122]. In addition, a recent study showed that Chinese women with mixed infections had a significantly higher abundance of Mycoplasma, Prevotella, Streptococcus, Anaerococcus, Dialister, Peptostreptococcus, and Peptinophilus, while presenting with a significantly lower concentration of Lactobacillus spp. than with trichomoniasis alone [123]. The authors conclude that probiotic pessaries could provide a solution for the shift towards a balanced vaginal microbiome, implying that lactic acid, the physiological product of lactobacilli, could also be a good choice to help to restore the abnormal microbiome in mixed infections.

5. Study Limitations

The limitations of the approach and results of the review will now be discussed. As mentioned above, the articles included for assessment here were selected from a search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library database from inception until 7 May 2021 by one reviewer. This was restricted by the length of time available for the research and the databases accessible at the time and as a result, it has unfortunately not been possible to include some of the more recently published articles on the topic in the full discussion [124,125]. However, one study which was underway when the present paper was being researched is now completed [29,125]. In [125], it was reported that participants with recurrent BV had a higher response to treatment with metronidazole than with lactic acid gel at 14 days, but subsequent recurrence of symptoms over 6 months was common in both arms. While metronidazole was more likely to be cost-effective compared with lactic acid gel, participants interviewed in a qualitative sub-study disliked taking a repeated course of antibiotics for BV, preferring the lactic acid gel, even if its short-term efficacy was lower than metronidazole, supporting the potential use of lactic gels for BV treatment for some subjects.
The results published regarding the efficacy of lactic acid in the treatment and prophylaxis of BV does not always reach a clear consensus in a clinical setting and are limited. The variation in efficacy results might be partly due to generalization of the study population, despite different grades of BV severity, and the administration route. More randomized, controlled, adequately powered clinical studies are required to further evaluate the effect of lactic acid in BV [126]. However, the protective and potential curative effects of lactic acid in BV have been extensively explored and are demonstrated to be of added value [56,57,58,60,61].
The work presented here has focussed on BV, and it has not been possible to go into aerobic vaginitis in depth in this report. The authors hope to revisit this topic if possible in the future.

6. Conclusions

BV remains a widespread and often recurrent condition impacting the health and quality of life of its subject. Although traditional treatments for BV have been extensively explored, therapy recommendations are widely available, and initial treatment with antibiotics is very effective, the prevention of high BV recurrence rates remain an important challenge, especially because of the considerable impact of BV on patients’ quality of life [17]. Based on the available literature, recommendations have been made regarding the concomitant usage of lactic acid-based treatments with current BV treatment regimens. These could provide added value by stimulating restoration of the healthy vaginal microbiota and disrupting pathogenic biofilms, thereby aiding in the treatment of BV and prevention of recurrent infections. Fact-based guidance is important for building trust with the patient. Discussion about the use of lactic acid gel for BV treatment with the patient should include information about its potentially lower short-term efficacy compared with traditional antibiotic therapy, but balanced with information about reduced side effects and similar rates of recurrence in addition to removing the need for antibiotic usage.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the writing, review, and editing of this article. W.M. provided substantial contributions to the conception of this work and the interpretation of study data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was funded by Bayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland. Writing assistance was provided by Leni Vandekerckhove (MediGraphX, Belgium) and Jonathan Crowther (JMC Scientific Consulting Ltd., United Kingdom) who were funded by Bayer Consumer Care Ag, Basel, Switzerland.

Conflicts of Interest

W.M. has received honoraria for oral presentations at scientific congresses or meetings of experts. M.A.E.S. and L.Z. are employees of Bayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland.

References

  1. Li, J.; McCormick, J.; Bocking, A.; Reid, G. Importance of vaginal microbes in reproductive health. Reprod. Sci. 2012, 19, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Diop, K.; Dufour, J.C.; Levasseur, A.; Fenollar, F. Exhaustive repertoire of human vaginal microbiota. Hum. Microbiome J. 2019, 11, 100051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mendling, W. Vaginal microbiota. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 902, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Saraf, V.S.; Sheikh, S.A.; Ahmad, A.; Gillevet, P.M.; Bokhari, H.; Javed, S. Vaginal microbiome: Normalcy vs dysbiosis. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 3793–3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, X.; Lu, Y.; Chen, T.; Li, R. The Female Vaginal Microbiome in Health and Bacterial Vaginosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 631972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Buchta, V. Vaginal microbiome. Ces. Gynekol. 2018, 83, 371–379. [Google Scholar]
  7. Amabebe, E.; Anumba, D.O.C. The Vaginal Microenvironment: The Physiologic Role of Lactobacilli. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Klebanoff, M.A.; Schwebke, J.R.; Zhang, J.; Nansel, T.R.; Yu, K.F.; Andrews, W.W. Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 104, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Reiter, S.; Spadt, S.K. Bacterial vaginosis: A primer for clinicians. Postgrad. Med. 2019, 131, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Javed, A.; Parvaiz, F.; Manzoor, S. Bacterial Vaginosis: An insight into the prevalence, alternative regimen treatments and its associated resistance patterns. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 127, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Joseph, R.J.; Ser, H.L.; Kuai, Y.H.; Tan, L.T.-H.; Arasoo, V.J.T.; Letchumanan, V.; Wang, L.; Pusparajah, P.; Goh, B.-H.; Ab Mutalib, N.-S.; et al. Finding a Balance in the Vaginal Microbiome: How Do We Treat and Prevent the Occurrence of Bacterial Vaginosis? Antibiotics 2021, 10, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bradshaw, C.S.; Sobel, J.D. Current Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis-Limitations and Need for Innovation. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 214, S14–S20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Hill, G.B. The microbiology of bacterial vaginosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993, 169, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kalia, N.; Singh, J.; Kaur, M. Microbiota in vaginal health and pathogenesis of recurrent vulvovaginal infections: A critical review. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2020, 19, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Muzny, C.A.; Taylor, C.M.; Swords, W.E.; Tamhane, A.; Chattopadhyay, D.; Cerca, N.; Schwebke, J.R. An Updated Conceptual Model on the Pathogenesis of Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 220, 1399–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lamont, R.F.; Sobel, J.D.; Akins, R.A.; Hassan, S.S.; Chaiworapongsa, T.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Romeroa, R. The vaginal microbiome: New information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011, 118, 533–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Swidsinski, A.; Mendling, W.; Loening-Baucke, V.; Ladhoff, A.; Swidsinski, S.; Hale, L.P.; Lochs, H. Adherent biofilms in bacterial vaginosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 106, 1013–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Allsworth, J.E.; Peipert, J.F. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis: 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 109, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marrazzo, J.M. Interpreting the epidemiology and natural history of bacterial vaginosis: Are we still confused? Anaerobe 2011, 17, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Peebles, K.; Velloza, V.; Balkus, J.E.; McClelland, R.S.; Barnabas, R.V. High Global Burden and Costs of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2019, 46, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yalew, G.T.; Muthupandian, S.; Hagos, K.; Negash, L.; Venkatraman, G.; Hagos, Y.M.; Meles, H.N.; Weldehaweriat, H.H.; Al-Dahmoshi, H.O.M.; Saki, M. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis and their associated risk factors among pregnant women from northern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mulinganya, G.; de Vulder, A.; Bisimwa, G.; Boelens, J.; Claeys, G.; De Keyser, K.; De Vos, D.; Hendwa, E.; Kampara, F.; Kujirakwinja, Y.; et al. Prevalence, risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes of second trimester bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Amsel, R.; Totten, P.A.; Spiegel, C.A.; Chen, K.C.S.; Eschenbach, D.; Holmes, K.K. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 1983, 74, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Koumans, E.H.; Sternberg, M.; Bruce, C.; McQuillan, G.; Kendrick, J.; Sutton, M.; Markowitz, L.E. The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001–2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2007, 34, 864–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Coudray, M.S.; Madhivanan, P. Bacterial vaginosis-A brief synopsis of the literature. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 245, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kairys, N.; Garg, M. Bacterial Vaginosis. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nugent, R.P.; Krohn, M.A.; Hillier, S.L. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991, 29, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Singh, R.; Ramsuran, V.; Mitchev, N.; Niehaus, A.J.; Han, K.S.S.; Osman, F.; Ngcapu, S.; Karim, S.A.; Rompalo, A.; Garrett, N.; et al. Assessing a diagnosis tool for bacterial vaginosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 39, 1481–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Watkins, J.A.; Ross, J.D.C.; Thandi, S.; Brittain, C.; Kai, J.; Griffiths, F. Acceptability of and treatment preferences for recurrent bacterial vaginosis—Topical lactic acid gel or oral metronidazole antibiotic: Qualitative findings from the VITA trial. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Colonna, C.; Steelman, M. Amsel Criteria. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  31. Donders, G.G.G. Definition and classification of abnormal vaginal flora. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2007, 21, 355–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, M.; Wang, Y.; Bai, H.; Wang, Y.; Rui, C.; Fan, C.; Li, J.; Li, N.; et al. Deep Neural Networks Offer Morphologic Classification and Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e02236-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cherpes, T.L.; Meyn, L.A.; Krohn, M.A.; Lurie, J.G.; Hillier, S.L. Association between acquisition of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women and bacterial vaginosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 37, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Abbai, N.S.; Reddy, T.; Ramjee, G. Prevalent bacterial vaginosis infection—a risk factor for incident sexually transmitted infections in women in Durban, South Africa. Int. J. STD AIDS 2016, 27, 1283–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Balkus, J.E.; Richardson, B.A.; Rabe, L.K.; Taha, T.E.; Mgodi, N.; Kasaro, M.P.; Ramjee, G.; Hoffman, I.F.; Karim, S.S.A. Bacterial vaginosis and the risk of trichomonas vaginalis acquisition among HIV-1-negative women. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2014, 41, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Sewankambo, N.; Gray, R.H.; Wawer, M.J.; Paxton, L.; McNairn, D.; Wabwire-Mangen, F.; Serwadda, D.; Li, C.; Kiwanuka, N.; Hillier, S.L. HIV-1 infection associated with abnormal vaginal flora morphology and bacterial vaginosis. Lancet 1997, 350, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Redelinghuys, M.J.; Geldenhuys, J.; Jung, H.; Kock, M.M. Bacterial Vaginosis: Current Diagnostic Avenues and Future Opportunities. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ellington, K.; Saccomano, S.J. Recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Nursing 2021, 51, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Armstrong, E.; Kaul, R. Beyond bacterial vaginosis: Vaginal lactobacilli and HIV risk. Microbiome 2021, 9, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Workowski, K.A.; Bolan, G.A. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2015, 64, 1–138. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sherrard, J.; Wilson, J.; Donders, G.; Mendling, W.; Jensen, J.S. 2018 European (IUSTI/WHO) International Union against sexually transmitted infections (IUSTI) World Health Organisation (WHO) guideline on the management of vaginal discharge. Int. J. STD AIDS 2018, 29, 1258–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Larsson, P.G.; Forsum, U. Bacterial vaginosis—A disturbed bacterial flora and treatment enigma. APMIS 2005, 113, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vodstrcil, L.A.; Muzny, C.A.; Plummer, E.L.; Sobel, J.; Bradshaw, C.S. Bacterial vaginosis: Drivers of recurrence and challenges and opportunities in partner treatment. BMC Med. 2021, 19, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Swidsinski, A.; Mendling, W.; Loening-Baucke, V.; Swidsinski, S.; Dörffel, Y.; Scholze, J.; Lochs, H.; Verstraelen, H. An adherent Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm persists on the vaginal epithelium after standard therapy with oral metronidazole. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 198, 97.e1–97.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gaspar, C.; Rolo, J.; Cerca, N.; Palmeira-de-Oliveira, R.; Martinez-de-Oliveira, J.; Palmeira-de-Oliveira, A. Dequalinium Chloride Effectively Disrupts Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Gardnerella spp. Biofilms. Pathogens 2021, 10, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Deng, Z.-L.; Gottschick, C.; Bhuju, S.; Masur, C.; Abels, C.; Wagner-Döbler, I. Metatranscriptome Analysis of the Vaginal Microbiota Reveals Potential Mechanisms for Protection against Metronidazole in Bacterial Vaginosis. mSphere 2018, 3, e00262-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Baldacci, F.; Baldacci, M.; Bertini, M. Lactobacillus rhamnosus BMX 54 + Lactose, A Symbiotic Long-Lasting Vaginal Approach to Improve Women’s Health. Int. J. Womens Health 2020, 12, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tomás, M.; Palmeira-de-Oliveira, A.; Simões, S.; Martinez-de-Oliveira, J.; Palmeira-de-Oliveira, R. Bacterial vaginosis: Standard treatments and alternative strategies. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 587, 119659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. van de Wijgert, J.H.H.M.; Verwijs, M.C.; Agaba, S.K.; Bronows, C.; Mwambarangwe, L.; Uwineza, M.; Lievens, E.; Nivoliez, A.; Ravel, J.; Darby, A.C. Intermittent Lactobacilli-containing Vaginal Probiotic or Metronidazole Use to Prevent Bacterial Vaginosis Recurrence: A Pilot Study Incorporating Microscopy and Sequencing. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Laue, C.; Papazova, E.; Liesegang, A.; Pannenbeckers, A.; Arendarski, P.; Linnerth, B.; Domig, K.J.; Kneifel, W.; Petricevic, L.; Schrezenmeir, J. Effect of a yoghurt drink containing Lactobacillus strains on bacterial vaginosis in women—A double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical pilot trial. Benef. Microbes 2018, 9, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Jeng, H.; Yan, T.; Chen, J. Treating vaginitis with probiotics in non-pregnant females: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 20, 3749–3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, H.F.; Yi, N. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of probiotics for bacterial vaginosis. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 26, 90–98. [Google Scholar]
  53. dos Santos, A.M.; Carvalho, S.G.; Araujo, V.H.S.; Carvalho, G.C.; Gremião, M.P.D.; Chorilli, M. Recent advances in hydrogels as strategy for drug delivery intended to vaginal infections. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 590, 119867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jayaram, P.M.; Mohan, M.K.; Konje, J. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy—A storm in the cup of tea. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 253, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chappell, B.T.; Mena, L.A.; Maximos, B.; Mollan, S.; Culwell, K.; Howard, B. EVO100 prevents chlamydia and gonorrhea in women at high risk of infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 225, 162.e1–162.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. O’Hanlon, D.E.; Moench, T.R.; Cone, R.A. Vaginal pH and microbicidal lactic acid when lactobacilli dominate the microbiota. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Tachedjian, G.; O’Hanlon, D.E.; Ravel, J. The implausible “in vivo” role of hydrogen peroxide as an antimicrobial factor produced by vaginal microbiota. Microbiome 2018, 6, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Reid, G. Probiotic agents to protect the urogenital tract against infection. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73 (Suppl. S2), 437S–443S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. O’Hanlon, D.E.; Come, R.A.; Moench, T.R. Vaginal pH measured in vivo: Lactobacilli determine pH and lactic acid concentration. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 191, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Aldunate, M.; Srbinovski, D.; Hearps, A.C.; Latham, C.F.; Ramsland, P.A.; Gugasyan, R.; Cone, R.A.; Tachedjian, G. Antimicrobial and immune modulatory effects of lactic acid and short chain fatty acids produced by vaginal microbiota associated with eubiosis and bacterial vaginosis. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gong, Z.; Luna, Y.; Yu, P.; Fan, H. Lactobacilli Inactivate Chlamydia trachomatis through Lactic Acid but Not H2O2. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107758. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tyssen, D.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Hayward, J.A.; Agius, P.A.; DeLong, K.; Aldunate, M.; Ravel, J.; Moench, T.R.; Cone, R.A.; Tachedjian, G. Anti-HIV-1 Activity of Lactic Acid in Human Cervicovaginal Fluid. mSphere 2018, 3, e00055-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Biliavska, L.; Pankivska, Y.; Povnitsa, O.; Zagorodnya, S. Antiviral Activity of Exopolysaccharides Produced by Lactic Acid Bacteria of the Genera Pediococcus, Leuconostoc and Lactobacillus against Human Adenovirus Type 5. Medicina 2019, 55, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Keller, M.J.; Carpenter, C.A.; Lo, Y.; Einstein, M.H.; Liu, C.; Fredricks, D.N.; Herold, B.C. Phase I Randomized Safety Study of Twice Daily Dosing of Acidform Vaginal Gel: Candidate Antimicrobial Contraceptive. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Ehrström, S.; Daroczy, K.; Rylander, E.; Samuelsson, C.; Johannesson, U.; Anzén, B.; Påhlson, C. Lactic acid bacteria colonization and clinical outcome after probiotic supplementation in conventionally treated bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis. Microbes Infect. 2010, 12, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. van der Veer, C.; Bruisten, S.M.; van Houdt, R.; Matser, A.A.; Tachedjian, G.; van de Wijgert, J.H.H.M.; de Vries, H.J.C.; van der Helm, J.J. Effects of an over-the-counter lactic-acid containing intra-vaginal douching product on the vaginal microbiota. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gottschick, C.; Deng, Z.L.; Vital, M.; Masur, C.; Abels, C.; Pieper, D.H.; Rohde, M.; Mendling, W.; Wagner-Döbler, I. Treatment of biofilms in bacterial vaginosis by an amphoteric tenside pessary-clinical study and microbiota analysis. Microbiome 2017, 5, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Boeke, A.J.P.; Dekker, J.H.; Van Eijk, J.T.M.; Kostense, P.J.; Bezemer, P.D. Effect of lactic acid suppositories compared with oral metronidazole and placebo in bacterial vaginosis: A randomised clincial trial. Genitourin Med. 1993, 69, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Decena, D.C.D.; Co, J.T.; Manalastas, R.M.; Palaypayon, E.P.; Padolina, C.S.; Sison, J.M.; Dancel, L.A.; Lelis, M.A. Metronidazole with Lactacyd vaginal gel in bacterial vaginosis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2006, 32, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fredstorp, M.; Jonasson, A.F.; Barth, A.; Robertsson, J. A New Effective, User-friendly Bacterial Vaginosis Treatment: A Randomized Multicenter Open-label Parallel-group Two-part Study with a Novel Sustained-release Pessary Containing Oligomeric Lactic Acid. J. Infect. Non Infect. Dis. 2015, 1, 006. [Google Scholar]
  71. Simoes, J.A.; Bahamondes, L.G.; Camargo, R.P.S.; Alves, V.M.N.; Zaneveld, L.J.D.; Waller, D.P.; Schwartz, J.; Callahan, M.M.; Mauck, C.K. A pilot clinical trial comparing an acid-buffering formulation (ACIDFORM gel) with metronidazole gel for the treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2006, 61, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Andersch, B.; Lindell, D.; Dahlen, I.; Brandberg, Å. Bacterial vaginosis and the effect of intermittent prophylactic treatment with an acid lactate gel. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 1990, 30, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Holst, E.; Brandberg, Å. Treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy with a lactate gel. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 1990, 22, 625–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Andersch, B.; Forssman, L.; Lincoln, K.; Torstensson, P. Treatment of bacterial vaginosis with an acid cream: A comparison between the effect of lactate-gel and metronidazole. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 1986, 21, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Mendling, W.; Martius, J.; Hoyme, U.B. S1-guideline on bacterial vaginosis in gynecology and obstetrics. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015, 74, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Muzny, C.A.; Schwebke, J.R. Asymptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis: To Treat or Not to Treat? Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2020, 22, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Crowley, T.; Low, N.; Turner, A.; Harvey, I.; Bidgood, K.; Horner, P. Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post-abortal upper genital tract infection in women with bacterial vaginosis: Randomised controlled trial. BJOG An. Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2001, 108, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Larsson, P.G.; Carlsson, B. Does pre- and postoperative metronidazole treatment lower vaginal cuff infection rate after abdominal hysterectomy among women with bacterial vaginosis? Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002, 10, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Miller, L.; Thomas, K.; Hughes, J.P.; Holmes, K.K.; Stout, S.; Eschenbach, D.A. Randomised treatment trial of bacterial vaginosis to prevent post-abortion complication. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2004, 111, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Qian, Z.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, D.; Yang, P.; Gao, F.; Lu, C.; Yin, Y.; Kan, S.; Chen, D. Probiotic lactobacillus Sp. Strains inhibit growth, adhesion, biofilm formation, and gene expression of bacterial vaginosis-inducing Gardnerella vaginalis. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mendling, W. Milchsäure und Milchsäurebakterien bei rezidivierenden Scheideninfektion. Frauenarzt 2010, 5, 453–466. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sobel, J.D.; Sobel, R. Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2021, 22, 1593–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Turner, E.; Sobel, J.D.; Akins, R.A. Prognosis of recurrent bacterial vaginosis based on longitudinal changes in abundance of Lactobacillus and specific species of Gardnerella. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0256445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Faught, B.M.; Reyes, S. Characterization and Treatment of Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Women’s Health 2019, 28, 1218–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sobel, J.D.; Ferris, D.; Schwebke, J.; Nyirjesy, P.; Wiesenfeld, H.C.; Peipert, J.; Soper, D.; Ohmit, S.E.; Hillier, S.L. Suppressive antibacterial therapy with 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel to prevent recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006, 194, 1283–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yudin, M.H.; Money, D.M.; Boucher, M.; Cormier, B.; Gruslin, A.; Ogilvie, G.; Paquet, C.; Steenbeek, A.; Van Eyk, N.; van Schalkwyk, J.; et al. Screening and Management of Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnancy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Canada 2008, 30, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Nyemba, D.C.; Haddison, E.C.; Wang, C.; Johnson, L.F.; Myer, L.; Davey, D.J. Prevalence of curable STIs and bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2021, 2021, 055057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Bonneton, M.; Huynh, B.T.; Seck, A.; Bercion, R.; Sarr, F.D.; Delarocque-Astagneau, E.; Vray, M. Bacterial vaginosis and other infections in pregnant women in Senegal. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Joyisa, N.; Moodley, D.; Nkosi, T.; Talakgale, R.; Sebitloane, M.; Naidoo, M.; Karim, Q.A. Asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy and missed opportunities for treatment: A cross-sectional observational study. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 2019, 7808179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Hillier, S.L.; Nugent, R.P.; Eschenbach, D.A.; Krohn, M.A.; Gibbs, R.S.; Martin, D.H.; Cotch, M.F.; Edelman, R.; Pastorek, J.G.; Rao, A.V.; et al. Association between Bacterial Vaginosis and Preterm Delivery of a Low-Birth-Weight Infant. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 333, 1737–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tabatabaei, N.; Eren, A.M.; Barreiro, L.B.; Yotova, V.; Dumaine, A.; Allard, C.; Fraser, W.D. Vaginal microbiome in early pregnancy and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm birth: A case–control study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019, 126, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Mullick, S.; Watson-Jones, D.; Beksinska, M.; Mabey, D. Sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy: Prevalence, impact on pregnancy outcomes, and approach to treatment in developing countries. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2005, 81, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Leitich, H.; Kiss, H. Asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis and intermediate flora as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2007, 21, 375–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Klebanoff, M.A.; Hillier, S.L.; Nugent, R.P.; MacPherson, C.A.; Hauth, J.C.; Carey, J.C.; Harper, M.; Wapner, R.J.; Trout, W.; Moawad, A. Is bacterial vaginosis a stronger risk factor for preterm birth when it is diagnosed earlier in gestation? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 192, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Guise, J.M.; Mahon, S.M.; Aickin, M.; Helfand, M.; Peipert, J.F.; Westhoff, C. Screening for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2001, 20, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bhakta, V.; Aslam, S.; Aljaghwani, A. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: Prevalence and outcomes in a tertiary care hospital. Afr. J. Reprod. Health 2021, 25, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Subtil, D.; Brabant, G.; Tilloy, E.; Devos, P.; Canis, F.; Fruchart, A.; Bissinger, M.-C.; Dugimont, J.-C.; Nolf, C.; Hacot, C.; et al. Early clindamycin for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy (PREMEVA): A multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2018, 392, 2171–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Moodley, T.; Moodley, D.; Sebitloane, M.; Maharaj, N.; Sartorius, B. Improved pregnancy outcomes with increasing antiretroviral coverage in South Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016, 16, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Moodley, D.; Sartorius, B.; Madurai, S.; Chetty, V.; Maman, S. Pregnancy Outcomes in Association with STDs including genital HSV-2 shedding in a South African Cohort Study. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2017, 93, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Brocklehurst, P.; Gordon, A.; Heatley, E.; Milan, S.J. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, 2013, 1–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Owens, D.K.; Davidson, K.W.; Krist, A.H.; Barry, M.J.; Cabana, M.; Caughey, A.B.; Donahue, K.; Doubeni, C.A.; Epling, J.W.; Kubik, M. Screening for Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Persons to Prevent Preterm Delivery: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020, 323, 1286–1292. [Google Scholar]
  102. Carey, J.C.; Klebanoff, M.A.; Hauth, J.C.; Hillier, S.L.; Thom, E.A.; Ernest, J.M.; Heine, R.P.; Nugent, R.P.; Fischer, M.L.; Leveno, K.J. Metronidazole to Prevent Preterm Delivery in Pregnant Women with Asymptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 342, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Nygren, P.; Fu, R.; Freeman, M.; Bougatsos, C.; Klebanoff, M.; Guise, J.M. Evidence on the benefits and harms of screening and treating pregnant women who are asymptomatic for bacterial vaginosis: An update review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 2008, 148, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Hoyme, U.B.; Hesse, M. Reduced incidence of early preterm birth in the State of Thuringia following an intravaginal pH-self-monitoring screening program. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2020, 302, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Goldenberg, R.L.; Culhane, J.F.; Iams, J.D.; Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008, 371, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lewis, A.L.; Laurent, L.C. USPSTF 2020 Recommendations on Screening for Asymptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnancy. JAMA 2020, 323, 1253–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sobel, J.D.; Subramanian, C.; Foxman, B.; Fairfax, M.; Gygax, S.E. Mixed vaginitis—More than coinfection and with therapeutic implications. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2013, 15, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Qi, W.; Li, H.; Wang, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, B.; Dong, M.; Fan, A.; Han, C.; Xue, F. Recent Advances in Presentation, Diagnosis and Treatment for Mixed Vaginitis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 759795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Benyas, D.; Sobel, J.D. Mixed Vaginitis Due to Bacterial Vaginosis and Candidiasis. J. Low Genit. Tract. Dis. 2022, 26, 68–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sobel, J.D. Vulvovaginal candidosis. Lancet 2007, 369, 1961–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sustr, V.; Foessleitner, P.; Kiss, H.; Farr, A. Vulvovaginal candidosis: Current concepts, challenges and perspectives. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Denning, D.W.; Kneale, M.; Sobel, J.D.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R. Global burden of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: A systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, e339–e347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mendling, W.; El Shazly, M.A.; Zhang, L. Clotrimazole for vulvovaginal candidosis: More than 45 years of clinical experience. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Donders, G.; Bellen, G.; Ausma, J.; Verguts, L.; Vaneldere, J.; Hinoul, P.; Borgers, M.; Janssens, D. The effect of antifungal treatment on the vaginal flora of women with vulvo-vaginal yeast infection with or without bacterial vaginosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011, 30, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Rivers, C.A.; Adaramola, O.O.; Schwebke, J.R. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis mixed infection in a southeastern American STD clinic. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2011, 38, 672–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Edwards, T.; Burke, P.; Smalley, H.; Hobbs, G. Trichomonas vaginalis: Clinical relevance, pathogenicity and diagnosis. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 42, 406–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Elkins, J.M.; Cantillo-Campos, S.; Sheele, J.M. Frequency of Coinfection on the Vaginal Wet Preparation in the Emergency Department. Cureus 2020, 12, e11566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Franklin, T.L.; Monif, G.R.G. Trichomonas vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis: Coexistence in vaginal wet mount preparations from pregnant women. J. Reprod. Med. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 45, 131–134. [Google Scholar]
  119. Kim, J.-M.; Park, Y.J. Probiotics in the Prevention and Treatment of Postmenopausal Vaginal Infections: Review Article. J. Menopausal. Med. 2017, 23, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Borges, S.; Silva, J.; Teixeira, P. The role of lactobacilli and probiotics in maintaining vaginal health. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014, 289, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Jones, C.P.; Carter, B.; Thomas, W.L. The treatment of resistant or recurrent vaginal trichomoniasis with lactic acid jelly and lactic acid douches. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 1960, 149, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mendling, W.; Plempel, M. Vaginal secretion levels after 6 days, 3 days and 1 day of treatment with 100, 200 and 500 mg vaginal tablets of clotrimazole and their therapeutic efficacy. Chemotherapy 1982, 28, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Li, T.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Bai, H.; Zong, X.; Wang, F.; Fan, L. Comparative analysis of the vaginal microbiome of Chinese women with Trichomonas vaginalis and mixed infection. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 154, 104790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Muñoz-Barreno, A.; Cabezas-Mera, F.; Tejera, E.; Machado, A. Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Armstrong-Buisseret, L.; Brittain, C.; Kai, J.; David, M.; Watkins, J.A.; Ozolins, M.; Jackson, L.; Abdali, Z.; Hepburn, T.; Griffiths, F.; et al. Lactic acid gel versus metronidazole for recurrent bacterial vaginosis in women aged 16 years and over: The VITA RCT. Health Technol. Assess. 2022, 26, 1–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Plummer, E.; Bradshaw, C.; Doyle, M.; Fairley, C.; Murray, G.; Bateson, D.; Masson, L.; Slifirski, J.; Tachedjian, G.; Vodstrcil, L. Lactic acid-containing products for bacterial vaginosis and their impact on the vaginal microbiota: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0246953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Futurepharmacol 02 00014 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram describing the literature search and article selection process.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram describing the literature search and article selection process.
Futurepharmacol 02 00014 g001
Table
Table 1. Clinical studies evaluating intravaginal lactic acid treatment in women with bacterial vaginosis.
Table 1. Clinical studies evaluating intravaginal lactic acid treatment in women with bacterial vaginosis.
RefAuthorYearPopulationDesignDiagnosisDrug and FormulationComparatorOutcomes
[68]Boeke1993Symptomatic BVRCT a
▪
Clinical diagnosis b
▪
Microscopy
▪
Culture
Lactic acid vaginal suppository/night × 7 days
▪
Oral MTZ 500 mg bid × 7 days and placebo vaginal suppository/night × 7 days
▪
Oral placebo bid × 7 days and placebo vaginal suppository/night × 7 days
≤2 of 4 Amsel criteria
  • ▪ 2 weeks: 49% lactic acid vs. 83% MTZ vs. 47% placebo
  • ▪ Complete cure
  • ▪ 2 weeks: 0% lactic acid vs. 10% MTZ vs. 3% placebo
  • ▪ 4 weeks: 20% lactic acid vs. 55% MZ vs. 20% placebo
  • ▪ 3 months: 28% lactic acid vs. 64% MTZ vs. 28% placebo
[69]Decena2006Symptomatic BVRCT
▪
Clinical diagnosis b
▪
Culture
Vaginal lactal gel 5 g/night × 7 nights
▪
Oral MTZ 500 mg bid × 7 days
▪
Oral MTZ 500 mg bid × 7 days + Vaginal lactal gel 5 g/night × 7 nights
▪
3, 8, and 14 days: Significant increase in Lactobacillus spp. colony count in the lactic acid groups vs. MTZ
▪
Decrease in pH, clue cells, and whiff test similar in all groups
[70]Fredstorp2015Symptomatic BVRCT
▪
Clinical diagnosis b
Oligomeric lactic acid pessary once or twice a week
▪
Untreated control group
▪
1 week: 71% once pessary and 80% twice pessary vs. 10% control group ≤ 2 of 4 Amsel criteria
[71]Simoes2006Symptomatic BVRCT, db
▪
Clinical diagnosis b,c
▪
Microscopy
Vaginal Acidform gel 5 g/day × 5 days
▪
Vaginal 10% MTZ gel/day × 5 days
▪
12–17 days after start of treatment: 23% Acidform vs. 88% MTZ ≤ 2 of 4 Amsel
▪
33–40 days after start of treatment: 8% Acidform vs. 53% MTZ ≤ 2 of 4 Amsel
[72]Andersch1990Recurrent BVRCT, db
▪
Clinical diagnosis b
▪
3 or more previous intervals of clinically diagnosed BV
Initial treatment with vaginal lactate gel 5 mL/night × 7 nights + prophylactic treatment for 6 months with 5 mL vaginal lactate gel/night × 3 nights immediately after menstruation
▪
Matching placebo treatment
▪
3 months: 28.5% lactate gel vs. 0% placebo clinically improved
▪
6 months: 88% lactate gel vs. 10% placebo clinically improved
[73]Holst1990Pregnant with symptomatic BVND
▪
Clinical diagnosis b
▪
Microscopy
▪
Culture
Vaginal lactal gel 5 mL/night × 7 nights +
4 treatments for 2 days with an interim period of 7 days or 5 treatments for 2 days with an interim period of 5 days
▪
None
▪
Day 2: Positive change in the vaginal microbiota
▪
Week 8: 80% cure rate and presence of normal Lactobacillus spp.
[74]Andersch1986Symptomatic BVRCT, db
▪
Clinical diagnosis b
▪
Microscopy
▪
Culture
Vaginal lactal gel 5 mL/night × 7 nights
▪
Oral MTZ 500 mg bid × 7 days
▪
1 week: 100% lactic acid vs. 100% MTZ ≤2 of 4 Amsel criteria
a Details of blinding are not provided. b According to Amsel (women presenting with ≥3 of 4 criteria): (I) the presence of homogeneous, thin, greyish white vaginal discharge, (II) a vaginal pH over 4.5, (III) a positive whiff-amine test, and (IV) > 20% clue cells/high power field on a wet mount of vaginal secretions [8]. c According to Nugent’s criteria: morphotyp ic assessment of l actobacilli, Gardnerella vaginalis, or bacteroides (small gram-variable rods or gram-negative rods), and curved gram-variable rods [9]. ND: Not Determined; MTZ: Metronidazole; db: double-blinded; sb: single-blinded.
Table
Table 2. Proposed treatments for women with bacterial vaginosis depending on the patient group.
Table 2. Proposed treatments for women with bacterial vaginosis depending on the patient group.
Patient GroupLactic AcidAntibioticsAntifungal
First time BVMild BVVaginal lactic acid, 5 mL, 7 daysNoNo
Moderate/Severe BVVaginal lactic acid, 5 mL, 7 daysOral metronidazole, 7 days, or
Vaginal metronidazole or clindamycin, 5–7 days		No
Recurrent BVVaginal lactic acid, 5 mL, 7 daysVaginal metronidazole, 4–6 months, or
Oral metronidazole or tinidazole, 7 days		No
Pregnant with BVSymptomaticVaginal lactic acid, 5 mL, 7 daysOral metronidazole or clindamycin, 7 days, or
Vaginal dequalinium, metronidazole, or clindamycin		No
Asymptomatic and at high risk of preterm birthVaginal lactic acid, 5 mL, 7 daysNoNo
Planning pregnancyAsymptomatic mild BVVaginal lactic acid, 5 mL, 7 daysNoNo
Mixed infectionBV and VVCVaginal lactic acid, 5 mL, 7 days, only if BV symptoms persist after VVC treatmentOnly if BV symptoms persist after VVC treatment, and depending on the patient groupVaginal clotrimazole, single dose
BV and trichomoniasisVaginal lactic acid, 5 mL, 7 daysOral metronidazole or tinidazole, single doseNo
BV: bacterial vaginosis; VVC: vulvovaginal candidosis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mendling, W.; Shazly, M.A.E.; Zhang, L. The Role of Lactic Acid in the Management of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Literature Review. Future Pharmacol. 2022, 2, 198-213. https://doi.org/10.3390/futurepharmacol2030014

AMA Style

Mendling W, Shazly MAE, Zhang L. The Role of Lactic Acid in the Management of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Literature Review. Future Pharmacology. 2022; 2(3):198-213. https://doi.org/10.3390/futurepharmacol2030014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mendling, Werner, Maged Atef El Shazly, and Lei Zhang. 2022. "The Role of Lactic Acid in the Management of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Literature Review" Future Pharmacology 2, no. 3: 198-213. https://doi.org/10.3390/futurepharmacol2030014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop