Next Article in Journal
A Novel Direct-Fed Microbial for Beef Cattle Has a Supportive Effect against Clostridium perfringens In Vitro and In Vivo
Next Article in Special Issue
The Cattle Trading Network and Its Effect on the Spread of Brucellosis in Paraná, Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Study on Meat Quality Characteristics of Murrah Buffalo and Nellore Cattle Commercialized in Southeastern Brazil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phosphorus for Cattle and Buffaloes in Brazil: Clinical Signs and Diagnosis of Its Deficiency and Relevance, and Recommended Strategies to Alleviate Issues Observed under Grazing Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Anti-Leptospira Antibodies in Buffaloes on Marajó Island

by
José Diomedes Barbosa
1,
Fernanda Monik Silva Martins
1,
Eliel Valentim Vieira
1,
Ruama Paixão de Lima Silva
1,
Henrique dos Anjos Bomjardim
2,
Marcos Xavier Silva
3 and
Felipe Masiero Salvarani
1,*
1
Instituto de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Pará, Castanhal 68740-970, PA, Brazil
2
Instituto de Estudos do Trópico Úmido, Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará, Xinguara 68557-335, PA, Brazil
3
Escola de Veterinária (EV), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, MG, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ruminants 2023, 3(3), 182-188; https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants3030017
Submission received: 14 June 2023 / Revised: 6 July 2023 / Accepted: 10 July 2023 / Published: 11 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disease Diagnostics and Surveillance in Ruminants)

Abstract

:
Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease that has a cosmopolitan geographical distribution, reported in domestic and wild animals, which act as reservoirs and contribute to the spread of microorganisms in the environment. In Brazil, studies on the occurrence of leptospirosis in buffaloes in the Amazon Biome are scarce. The objective of this study was to determine the occurrences of antibodies against Leptospira spp., including serovar Hardjo (Bolivia), isolated from cattle in Brazil and not yet tested in buffaloes. A total of 387 blood serum samples of animals from nine municipalities on Marajó Island, State of Pará, northern Brazil, were obtained from a biological sample bank and analyzed using the microscopic agglutination test (MAT). Serology revealed 91.5% (387/354) of the animals tested positive for anti-Leptospira antibodies. The presence of various detected serovars may have been related to the local practice of combined rearing of different livestock species, as well as to the contact with wild animals and rodents from adjacent forest areas, all factors that likely facilitated the epidemiological chain of the disease in buffaloes. Among the serovars tested, the serovar Hardjo (Bolivia) was the most prevalent, which was present in 79.3% of the reactive buffaloes. It was important to carry out serological and bacteriological surveys in order to identify the serovars that occurred in the herds, with the objective of designing efficient strategies to control leptospirosis in the production of buffaloes.

1. Introduction

Leptospirosis is an infectious disease caused by the spirochete bacteria of the species Leptospira, which includes more than 260 reported serovars [1]. This zoonotic disease has a cosmopolitan geographical distribution, having been reported in domestic and wild animals, which act as reservoirs and contribute to the spread of the bacteria in the environment. The disease is more frequent in hot–humid tropical regions due to climatic characteristics such as abundant rainfall, heat, and humidity, which favor the prevalence of the bacteria in the environment [2,3].
In Brazil, previous studies have identified the occurrences of anti-Leptospira antibodies in buffaloes [4,5,6,7,8], but, in the seroepidemiological surveys, none used Leptospira interrogans serovar Hardjo (strain Bolivia, genotype Hardjoprajitno), isolated from cattle in Brazil [9,10], so this is the first study to use this strain for the evaluation of MAT anti-Leptospira titers in buffaloes.
The primary form of transmission of buffalo leptospirosis is through the contact of susceptible animals with the urine of infected animals through either the skin, mucous membranes, or conjunctiva. In the Amazon region, buffaloes remain in flooded areas for long periods of time and may develop subclinical infections that favor the epidemiological chain of the disease in a herd [10]. The main clinical signs of leptospirosis that can be observed are abortion and mastitis, which have direct negative impacts on production, causing considerable losses to farmers and the livestock sector [7,11].
The number of buffaloes in Brazil is around 1.4 million heads, and the State of Pará in northern Brazil is responsible for 38.2% of the total number of animals in the country, with Marajó Island accounting for the largest herd [12,13]. However, despite this considerable herd size, the production characteristics in the state, such as extensive grazing alongside other domestic species and deficient hygienic–sanitary control, limit the productive potential of the buffalo sector [14].
Knowledge on the main Leptospira serovars circulating in the region is important for adequate management of the disease and to increase productivity, as are the isolation and treatment of diseased animals in addition to preventive vaccinations in herds [10,15,16]
Given the importance of leptospirosis to the buffalo production chain and the possible negative impacts of the disease in the livestock sector, the objective of this study was to determine the occurrence of antibodies against Leptospira spp., including Leptospira interrogans serovar Hardjo (strain Bolivia) isolated from cattle in Brazil and underused in buffaloes.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was conducted using 387 samples of blood serum from Jafarabadi x Murrah crossbred buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) of both sexes, with an average age of 36 months, obtained from the biological sample bank of the Veterinary Hospital of the Institute of Veterinary Medicine of the Federal University of Pará (Instituto de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal do Pará—IMV-UFPA). The samples were collected over 12 months, comprising both the dry and wet seasons in the Amazon region. The sera used in this study were from animals from nine municipalities of Marjó Island, State of Pará: Cachoeira do Arari (n = 60), Santa Cruz do Arari (n = 60), Soure (n = 60), Salvaterra (n = 60), Chaves (n = 60), Melgaço (n = 16), Muaná (n = 3), Ponta de Pedras (n = 60), and Anajás (n = 8).
According to the history of the properties sampled, the buffalo herds were indigenous, reared with low or no sanitary control, only vaccinated for brucellosis and foot-and-mouth disease, and never vaccinated against leptospirosis. The buffaloes were reared in extensive grazing systems alongside other domestic species such as cattle, horses, pigs, and small ruminants. All properties studied had a swath of land with native vegetation with the presence of wild animals, especially rodents, which are possibly reservoirs of the bacteria Leptospira spp., and the buffaloes had access to this area. The animals submitted to blood collection had normal health statuses, without reporting from owners of abortion, mastitis, or death near the time of blood collection.
The detection of anti-Leptospira spp. antibodies was performed in the Laboratory of Leptospirosis of the Veterinary School of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais) using the microscopic agglutination test, which was considered the gold standard for leptospirosis diagnosis [16,17]. The battery of antigens used for the MAT comprised the serovars Bataviae, Bratislava, Icterohaemorragiae, Pomona, Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo genotype Hardjobovis, and the Leptospira interrogans serovar Hardjo genotype Hardjoprajitno strains CTG, OMS, and Bolivia (Table 1).
The microscopic agglutination test (MAT) was the test used for screening, and animals with titration titers of 1:100 were considered positive. We considered animals as reactive (positive) to the tested serovars if at least 50% agglutination was observed in the respective sera at the 1:100 screening dilution, and non-reactive if less than 50% or no agglutination was observed, according to interpretation parameters by the World Organization for Animal Health [18].

3. Results

Of the 387 serum samples tested, 354 tested positive for the presence of anti-Leptospira spp. antibodies, indicating an occurrence rate of 91.5% (Table 2).
Serovar Hardjo (Bolivia) showed the highest reaction percentage, followed by the Hardjo (OMS sample strain) and Hardjo type Hardjobovis serovars (Table 3). Other serovars that reacted in part of the animals analyzed were the Pomona and Hardjo (CTG sample strain). The serovars Bratislava, Icterohaemorrhagiae, and Bataviae reacted less among the buffaloes tested. Of all buffalo tested, 263 (67.2%) were seropositive, up to two serovars in this research.

4. Discussion

We found a higher frequency of reactive buffaloes than those reported in other Brazilian states (37.7% to 43.7% in São Paulo, 27.9% in Paraíba, 70.6% in Maranhão) and previously in Pará, with 80% [4,5,6,7,8]. The high frequency of animals testing positive in all municipalities’ studied evidence, the environmental characteristics, and the high incidences in the studied regions were all endemicity factors for leptospirosis [7]. Levels of precipitation were high in the Amazon region, with relative humidity tending to be above 80% and an average annual temperature of 26 °C [19]. These climatic traits favored the prevalence of the bacteria Leptospira spp. in the environment and increased the transmission risk of leptospirosis, facilitating the entire epidemiological chain of the disease [20].
In addition to the region’s geoclimatic characteristics, the buffalo production system adopted in the Amazon, in which buffaloes are reared extensively alongside other livestock species with no division within and between estates, makes it difficult to adopt hygienic–sanitary management practices, reinforcing the hypothesis that leptospirosis spreads easily among Pará buffalo herds, including on Marajó Island, as previously reported by Barbosa [15]. The high frequency of leptospirosis observed may also be related to the contact of buffaloes with wild animals from adjacent forest areas, namely, rodents and other small mammals, which are possible sources and transmitters of the agent [3].
Buffaloes can also act as key epidemiological agents, serving as important sources and disseminators of leptospirosis due to their immersion behaviors in water [21]. Water is considered a primary route of contamination for new hosts, as it may contain bacteria [22]. As the Amazonian biome is mainly composed of rivers and lakes, it increases the risk of spreading leptospirosis between productive production and wild animals, as well as humans [23]. Given the presence of rodents in the region and the contact of buffaloes with contaminated urine, it is possible that buffaloes are a link in the leptospirosis transmission chain for humans and other ruminants [24].
This is the first study to report leptospiral titers to serovar Hardjo (Bolivia) in buffaloes in Marajó Island, Amazon Biome, Brazil. The high frequency of this serovar in our samples suggests the need to include serovar Hardjo (Bolivia) in the battery of diagnostic antigens for Leptospira spp. in buffaloes in Brazil, as animals are traded widely among the Amazon and other regions of Brazil. The high frequencies of other serovars of the Hardjo group in our samples suggest that these serovars, which have a known predilection for cattle, may also have a predilection for buffaloes. The combined rearing of cattle and buffaloes in our study sites may facilitate the interspecific transmission of serovars. Additional serological studies, as well as the isolation and identification of the bacterial agents in buffaloes with the disease, are needed to clarify the occurrence of Hardjo serovars in buffaloes in Brazil [25].
When compared to the data observed by Viana et al.’s [6] study conducted in the State of Pará, we can observe the occurrence of the Serovar Hardjo, whereas they worked with of the serogroup Sejroe, which is considered more common (CTG sample); Hardjo (WHO sample); and Hardjo (Bolivia), which are also from the Sejroe serogroup. With this, we can suggest the need to use different serovars as seroepidemiological research to obtain results with greater comprehensiveness. When more serovars are included in the surveys [2,20], the diagnosis becomes more specific and is able to identify the most important serovars in the regions studied, optimizing the prophylactic and control measures to be adopted towards the herds.
The prevalence of the Pomona serovar in our samples confirms the infection potential of this serovar in buffalo populations [26]. As buffaloes in Pará are kept in extensive grazing systems in cohabitation with other livestock, the high frequency of the Pomona serovar in buffaloes might be related to cross-infection with pigs [3,5]. The same may be true for the serovar Bratislava, due to contact of buffaloes with horses, one of the hosts and sources of infection by this specific serovar [27].
The serotypes Icterohaemorrhagiae and Bataviae were the least common titers found in the present study among our samples, which can be explained by the extensive breeding system adopted in the farms where buffaloes were bred in greater contact with the sources of infection, like rodents and other wild mammal reservoirs. These animal species are present in higher concentrations near the dwellings of properties and buildings storing feed, which serve as food sources [27,28,29], although the occurrence of rodents was reported at the farms sampled in this study. The occurrence of animals with antibody titers against the serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae was lower, in addition to other serovars (Bataviae and Bratislava) in the present study and in the literature. However, all serovars of Leptsopira are risk factors for zoonotic occurrence of the disease, reiterating the importance of the use of maximum serovars in the battery of diagnostic tests for leptospirosis in animals and humans. The occurrence of Icterohaemorrhagiae titers in ruminants (in particular in buffaloes) was low. However, as well as other serovars that were reactive in the present study, they still reflected risk factors for the zoonotic occurrence of the disease and its detection, reiterating the importance of the use of different serovars in the antigen batteries of diagnostic tests of leptospirosis [9,10,30].

5. Conclusions

Anti-Leptospira antibodies were detected in 91.5% (387/354) of buffaloes from nine municipalities of Marajó Island in Pará state in the Amazon region of Brazil. The titers against the serovar Hardjo (strain Bolivia) were the most prevalent, comprising 79.3% of the reactive buffaloes. The presence and prevalence of various serovars detected may have been related to the local practice of combination rearing of different livestock species, as well as with contact with wild animals and rodents from adjacent forest areas, all factors that likely facilitated the epidemiological chain of the disease in buffaloes. It is important to carry out serological and bacteriological surveys in order to identify the serovars that occurred in the herds, with the objective of designing efficient strategies to control leptospirosis in the production of buffaloes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.D.B., M.X.S. and F.M.S.; methodology, F.M.S.M., E.V.V., R.P.d.L.S. and H.d.A.B.; formal analysis, M.X.S. and F.M.S.; investigation, J.D.B., F.M.S.M., E.V.V., R.P.d.L.S. and H.d.A.B.; data curation, J.D.B., M.X.S. and F.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.D.B., M.X.S. and F.M.S.; writing—review and editing, F.M.S.; supervision, J.D.B., M.X.S. and F.M.S.; project administration, J.D.B., M.X.S. and F.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol number 8117280421 (ID 001663) was approved by the National Council for Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) and was approved by the Ethic Committee on Animal Use of the Federal University of Para (CEUA/UFPA) in a meeting on 05/27/2022.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This article will be published in honor of its author: the veterinarian and Master’s degree recipient Mário Arthur da Costa Leal, who died of COVID-19 before he could see his work in the scientific world. The authors are grateful to André Almeida Fernandes, Tatiane Albernaz Ferreira, and Rômulo Cerqueira Leite; CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico); FAPESPA (Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisas do Estado do Pará); CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Finance Code 001); and PROPESP-UFPA (Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação da Universidade Federal do Pará).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adler, B.; Moctezuma, A.P. Leptospira and leptospirosis. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 140, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Escócio, C.; Genovez, M.E.; Castro, V.; Piatti, R.M.; Gabriel, F.H.L.; Chiebao, D.P.; Azevedo, S.S.; Vieira, S.R.; Chiba, M. Influência das condições ambientais na transmissão da leptospirose entre criações de ovinos e bovinos da região de Sorocaba, SP. Arq. Inst. Biol. 2010, 77, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Giraldo, J.L.M.; Hoyos, J.A.C.; Garcia, I.W.; Abeledo, M.A. Prevalencia de anticuerpos a Brucella abortus, Leptospira sp. y Neospora caninum em hatos bovinos y bubalinos en el Departamento de Caquetá, Colombia. Rev. Salud Anim. 2014, 36, 80–89. [Google Scholar]
  4. Langoni, H.; Del Fava, C.; Cabral, K.G.; Silva, A.V.; Chagas, S.A.P. Aglutininas anileptospíricas em búfalos do Vale do Ribeira, Estado de São Paulo. Ciênc. Rural 1999, 29, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Favero, A.C.M.; Pinheiro, S.R.; Vasconcellos, S.A.; Morais, Z.M.; Ferreira, F.; Neto, J.S.F. Sorovares de Leptospira predominantes em exames sorológicos de bubalinos, ovinos, caprinos, equinos, suínos e cães de diversos Estados brasileiros. Ciênc. Rural 2002, 32, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Viana, R.B.; Del Fava, C.; Moura, A.C.B.; Cardoso, E.C.; Araújo, C.V.; Monteiro, B.M.; Pituco, E.M.; Vasconvellos, S.A. Ocorrência de anticorpos anti-Neospora caninum, Brucella sp., e Leptospira spp. em búfalos (Bubalus bubalis) criados na Amazônia. Arq. Inst. Biol. 2009, 76, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brasil, A.W.L.; Parentoni, R.N.; Costa, D.F.; Pimenta, C.L.R.M.; Araújo, R.P.; Leal, A.B.G.; Alves, C.J.; Azevedo, S.S. Occurrence of anti-Brucella abortus and anti-Leptsopira spp. antibodies in buffaloes from Paraíba state, Northeastern Brazil. Semina 2015, 36, 2005–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Carvalho, O.S.; Gonzaga, L.N.R.; Albuquerque, A.S.; Bezerra, D.C.; Chaves, N.P. Occurrence of Brucella abortus, Leptospira interrogans, and bovine herpesvirus type 1 in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) herd under extensive breeding system. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2015, 9, 598–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chiareli, O.; Cosate, M.R.V.; Moreira, E.C.; Leite, R.C.; Lobato, F.C.F.; Silva, J.A.; Teixeira, J.F.B.; Marcelino, A.P. Controle da leptospirose em bovinos de leite com vacina autógena em Santo Antônio do Monte, Minas Gerais. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2012, 32, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cosate, M.R.V.; Sakamoto, T.; de Oliveira Mendes, T.A.; Moreira, E.C.; da Silva, C.G.R.; Brasil, B.F.A.S.; Oliveira, C.F.S.; de Azevedo, V.A.; Ortega, J.M.; Leite, C.R.; et al. Molecular typing of Leptospira interrogans serovar Hardjo isolates from leptospirosis outbreaks in Brazilian livestock. BMC Vet. Res. 2017, 13, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Genovez, M.E. Leptospirose: Uma doença de ocorrência além da época das chuvas! Biológico 2009, 71, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  12. Swancharoen, D.; Chaisakdanugull, Y.; Thanapongtharm, W.; Yoshida, S. Serological Survey of Leptospirosis in Livestock in Thailand. Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 141, 2269–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatpistica (IBGE). Produção da Pecuária Municipal. 2022. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/84/ppm_2015_v43_br.pdf (accessed on 16 July 2022).
  14. Ministério da Agricutura e Pecuária (MAPA). Dados de Rebanho Bovino e Bubalino no Brasil. 2022. Available online: www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/sanidadeanimalevegetal/saudeanimal/programasdesaudeanimal/febreaftosa/documentosfebreaftosa/DadosderebanhobovinoebubalinodoBrasil_2022.pdf (accessed on 16 July 2022).
  15. Barbosa, N.G.S. Bubalinocultura no Estado do Pará. Rev. Bras. Reprod. Anim. 2005, 29, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mineiro, A.L.B.B.; Vieira, R.J.; Beserra, E.E.A.; Leal, L.M.; Sousa, F.A.L.; Campos, Â.P.; Moreira, E.C.; Costa, F.A.L. Avaliação do controle de leptospirose por vacinação em bovinos de propriedade leiteira no estado do Piauí. Arq. Inst. Biol. 2014, 81, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Khalili, M.; Sakhaee, E.; Aflatoonian, M.R.; Abdollahpour, G.; Tabrizi, S.S.; Damaneh, E.M.; Hossini-nasab, S. Seroprevalence of Bovine Leptospiral Antibodies by Microscopic Agglutination Test in Southeast of Iran. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 5, 354–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. World Health Organization. International Health Regulations (2005); World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008; p. 74. [Google Scholar]
  19. Moraes, B.C.; Costa, J.M.N.; Costa, A.C.L.; Costa, M.H. Variação espacial e temporal da precipitação no estado do Pará. Acta Amaz. 2005, 35, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sarmento, A.M.C.; Azevedo, S.S.; Morais, Z.M.; Souza, G.O.; Oliveira, F.C.S.; Gonçales, A.P.; Miraglia, F.; Vasconcellos, S.A. Emprego de estirpes Leptospira spp. isoladas no Brasil na microtécnica de soroaglutinação microscópica aplicada ao diagnóstico da leptospirose em rebanhos bovinos de oito Estados brasileiros. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2012, 32, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ablas, D.S.; Titto, E.A.L.; Pereira, A.M.F.; Titto, C.G.; Leme, T.M.C. Comportamento de bubalinos a pasto frente à disponibilidade de sombra e água para imersão. Ciênc. Anim. Bras. 2007, 8, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  22. Araújo Neto, J.O.; Alves, C.J.; Azevedo, S.S.; Silva, M.L.C.R.; Bastista, C.S.A. Soroprevalência da leptospirose em caprinos da microrregião do Seridó Oriental, Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil, e pesquisa de fatores de risco. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 2010, 47, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Vieira, A.S.; Lilenbaum, W. Leptospirosis on captive wild animals in Latin America. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017, 115, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Konrad, J.L.; Campero, L.M.; Caspe, G.S.; Brihuega, B.; Draghi, G.; Moore, D.P.; Crudeli, G.A.; Venturini, M.C.; Campero, C.M. Detection of antibodies against Brucella abortus, Leptospira spp., and Apicomplexa Protozoa in Water Buffaloes in the Northeast of Argentina. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2013, 45, 1751–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Saldanha, G.B.; Cavazini, N.C.; Silva, A.S.; Fernandes, M.B.; Badke, M.R.T.; Pivetta, C.G. Sorologia positiva para Leptospira butembo em bovinos apresentando problemas reprodutivos. Ciênc. Rural 2007, 37, 1182–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Gonçalves, L.M.F.; Costa, F.A.L. Leptospiroses em suínos no Brasil. Rev. Patol. Trop. 2011, 40, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bharti, A.R.; Nally, J.E.; Ricaldi, J.N.; Matthias, M.A.; Diaz, M.M.; Lovett, M.A.; Levett, P.N.; Gilman, R.H.; Willig, M.R.; Gotuzzo, E.; et al. Leptospirosis: A zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2003, 3, 757–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jouglard, S.D.D.; Brod, C.S. Leptospirose em cães: Prevalência e fatores de risco no meio rural do município de Pelotas, RS. Arq. Inst. Biol. 2000, 67, 181–185. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lilenbaum, W.; Rodrigues, F.; Barboza, F. Aglutininas antileptospiras em caninos do município amazônico de Oriximiná—Pará, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Vet. 2000, 7, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Del Fava, C.; Arcaro, J.R.P.; Pozzi, C.R.; Júnior, I.A.; Fagundes, H.; Pituco, E.M.; De Stefano, E.; Okuda, L.H.; Vasconcellos, S.A. Manejo sanitário para o controle de doenças da reprodução em um sistema leiteiro de produção semi-intensivo. Arq. Inst. Biol. 2003, 70, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Standards of Leptospira spp. per serogroup, serovar, and strain used in the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) to detect anti-Leptospira antibodies in buffaloes in Marajó Island, Pará state (Brazilian Amazon).
Table 1. Standards of Leptospira spp. per serogroup, serovar, and strain used in the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) to detect anti-Leptospira antibodies in buffaloes in Marajó Island, Pará state (Brazilian Amazon).
SerogroupSerovarStrain/Genotype
BataviaeBataviaeSwart
AustralisBratislavaJez Bratislava
IcterohaemorrhagiaeIcterohaemorrhagiaeRGA
PomonaPomonaPomona
SejroeHardjoHardjobovis
SejroeHardjoCTG/Hardjoprajitno
SejroeHardjoOMS/Hardjoprajitno
SejroeHardjoBolivia/Hardjoprajitno
Table 2. Sample size (N) and frequency (%) of reactive and non-reactive animals in the detection of anti-Leptospira spp. antibodies in buffaloes from different municipalities in Marajó Island, the State of Pará (Brazilian Amazon), using the microscopic agglutination test (MAT).
Table 2. Sample size (N) and frequency (%) of reactive and non-reactive animals in the detection of anti-Leptospira spp. antibodies in buffaloes from different municipalities in Marajó Island, the State of Pará (Brazilian Amazon), using the microscopic agglutination test (MAT).
MunicipalityReactiveNon-ReactiveTotal
N%N%
Anajás0787.5112.58
Chaves5896.623.460
Melgaço1487.5212.516
Muaná3100003
Ponta de Pedras5083.31016.760
Salvaterra5693.346.760
Santa Cruz do Arari5083.31016.760
Cachoeira do Arari5896.623.460
Soure5896.623.460
TOTAL35491.5338.5387
Table 3. Number of animals (N) and frequency of seroactive animals for different serovars of Leptospira spp. tested in buffaloes from different municipalities in Marajó Island, State of Pará (Brazilian Amazon), using serum agglutination microscopy (MAT).
Table 3. Number of animals (N) and frequency of seroactive animals for different serovars of Leptospira spp. tested in buffaloes from different municipalities in Marajó Island, State of Pará (Brazilian Amazon), using serum agglutination microscopy (MAT).
SerovarNFrequency (%)
Bataviae92.3
Bratislava4712.1
Hardjo type hardjobovis24864.1
Hardjo (CTG sample strain)11128.6
Hardjo (OMS sample strain)25164.8
Icterohaemorrhagiae164.1
Pomona17946.2
Hardjo (Bolivia)30779.3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barbosa, J.D.; Martins, F.M.S.; Vieira, E.V.; Silva, R.P.d.L.; Bomjardim, H.d.A.; Silva, M.X.; Salvarani, F.M. Anti-Leptospira Antibodies in Buffaloes on Marajó Island. Ruminants 2023, 3, 182-188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants3030017

AMA Style

Barbosa JD, Martins FMS, Vieira EV, Silva RPdL, Bomjardim HdA, Silva MX, Salvarani FM. Anti-Leptospira Antibodies in Buffaloes on Marajó Island. Ruminants. 2023; 3(3):182-188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants3030017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barbosa, José Diomedes, Fernanda Monik Silva Martins, Eliel Valentim Vieira, Ruama Paixão de Lima Silva, Henrique dos Anjos Bomjardim, Marcos Xavier Silva, and Felipe Masiero Salvarani. 2023. "Anti-Leptospira Antibodies in Buffaloes on Marajó Island" Ruminants 3, no. 3: 182-188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants3030017

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop