Next Article in Journal
Inflammatory Profile of Th9 Cells and Their Protective Potential in Helminth Infections
Previous Article in Journal
Current Advancements and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploring the Potential of Plant-Based CTB-INS Oral Vaccines in Treating Type 1 Diabetes

by
Jacques C. Mbongue
1,*,
Elaine Vanterpool
1 and
William H. R. Langridge
2
1
Department of Biological Sciences, Oakwood University, Huntsville, AL 35896, USA
2
Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Department of Basic Sciences, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11085 Campus Street, Mortensen Hall, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Immuno 2023, 3(2), 217-227; https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno3020014
Submission received: 14 April 2023 / Revised: 25 May 2023 / Accepted: 30 May 2023 / Published: 1 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Mucosal Immunology)

Abstract

:
The 19th century saw the development of vaccines, which were biological preparations designed to enhance immunity against specific diseases. Edible vaccines function by stimulating both systemic and mucosal immune responses against foreign pathogens, and they may potentially protect the host from autoimmunity. The mucosal surfaces provide a convenient and rapid route for delivering therapeutic small molecules. This is due to their large surface areas and easy administration. The effectiveness of mucosal immunization relies on the fact that mucous membranes represent the body’s largest immunogenic organ. Within this interface, there is a well-organized lymphatic structure known as MALT (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue), which includes both T and B cells and encompasses the adaptive arms of the immune system. Oral vaccines specifically stimulate immune responses in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), which consists of lymph nodes, Payer’s patches (where B cells make up about 75% of the population and T cells account for approximately 20%), and isolated lymphoid follicles within the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). However, a significant challenge in developing vaccines is the rapid degradation of antigens within the harsh environment of the digestive tract, which hampers effective protein delivery to the GIT. In light of recent proteomic analysis revealing strong up-regulation of the tryptophan catabolic enzyme indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO1) in DCs inoculated with the Cholera toxin B-subunit-Insulin fusion protein vaccine (CTB-INS), we are interested in investigating the effects of transgene integration into a selected plant cell as an edible vaccine.

1. Introduction

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), an autoimmune disease, results from the destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic cells. Although CD4 and CD8 T cells seem to play a major role in the death of pancreatic cells, humoral and cellular immunity also contribute to disease development. Although a variety of autoantigens are recognized by the T cell repertoire, insulin is crucial in the diabetogenic response. It has been demonstrated that a sizable subset of T lymphocytes that have invaded the islet of nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice react to insulin [1].
Recombinant DNA technological breakthroughs have made it possible to introduce diverse new genes into different plant species for certain objectives. Because of their eukaryotic features, which typically enable the required post-translational changes to preserve recombinant proteins’ innate biological function, plants are attractive bioreactors for the production of recombinant proteins. This holds true for the development of vaccine antigens and antibodies as well as plant enhancement. Autotrophic plant growth only requires soil minerals, water, nitrogen, solar energy, and carbon dioxide for the synthesis of its constituent proteins. Another advantage of producing biologically active proteins in edible plants is the direct administration of biologically active proteins through the eating of plant tissue altered for human consumption [2,3]. Recently, the administration of an edible vaccine, MucoRice-CTB, to participants resulted in elevated CTB-specific serum IgG and IgA antibody concentrations, with no reported serious adverse events. This suggested that MucoRice-CTB has the potential to be a safe and effective vaccine for the prevention of diarrheal disease [4].
Oral delivery of tissue-specific autoantigens may be helpful for the clinical prevention of spontaneous autoimmune diabetes [5,6,7]. However, the therapeutic potential has been restricted by the need for recurrent delivery of large amounts of autoantigen, and tolerance is often less successful in already sensitized hosts [8,9]. These limitations were overcome by transporting chemically conjugated autoantigens for the induction of oral tolerance utilizing the nontoxic B subunit of cholera toxin (CTB) [10,11,12]. The CTB carrier has been demonstrated to have therapeutic uses in the prevention and treatment of autoimmune disorders in animals [13]. As a result of CTB’s affinity for the GM1 ganglioside cell surface receptor present on GALT cells, including the membranous cells and enterocytes, for increased uptake and immunologic recognition, conjugation with CTB may significantly facilitate antigen delivery and presentation to the gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT) and resident dendritic cells (DC).
Thanks to advancements in the creation of plant recombinant proteins, genetically modified food plants may now synthesize and deliver vaccination antigens. This review discusses the manufacture of cholera toxin B subunits from potato plants as well as their use in the prevention of autoimmune and infectious illnesses. We will also show how transgenic plants that make human insulin and its CTB conjugate have the potential to become strong treatments by lowering the clinical signs and inflammation of diabetes in NOD mice and perhaps even humans.

2. CTB as an Adjuvant

The gram-negative bacterium Vibrio cholerae secretes a soluble toxin known as cholera toxin. Severe cholera, a potentially fatal diarrheal reaction, can be brought on by V. cholerae (especially O1 serogroups). Parts of the cholera toxin may have therapeutic characteristics, even though V. cholerae infection can be fatal. The two proteins that make up the cholera toxin are subunit A (CTA), which is present in the complex as a monomer, and subunit B (CTB), which forms a pentamer. The cholera toxin was first recognized as a dual protein by Lönnroth and Holmgren [14]. Following those of the cholera toxin and CTB, structural investigations of the closely related heat-labile enterotoxin from Escherichia coli were used to support these preliminary findings. Using five CTB monomers, a ring-like structure is created. Each monomer interacts with two neighboring molecules via salt bridges and hydrogen bonds without being covalently bonded to one another. In the middle of this pentameric arrangement, there are five alpha helices, one from each monomer, creating the wall of a tunnel-like structure. With a noticeable C-terminal alpha helical extension, CTA has a globular shape. When this extension is put into the tunnel made by the CTB pentamer, which only accepts one CTA molecule, the cholera toxin’s final AB5 hexameric structure is formed [15].
CTA is originally synthesized as a single protein chain, but a proteolytic cleavage splits it into two subunits, CTA1 and CTA2, which remain together in the hexamer until the complex enters the host cells and reaches the endoplasmic reticulum. CTA1 represents the globular component of CTA, and CTA2 is the projecting alpha helix that the pentamer inserts into the tunnel.
Cholera toxin is recognized by its receptor, monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1), which controls cellular absorption [16]. The identity of GM1 as a receptor for cholera toxin was described by Holmgren and colleagues in 1973 [14]. Each CTB monomer typically interacts with one pentasaccharide, even though each pentasaccharide extends its contact to an adjacent CTB molecule. This explains why CTB needs to take on a pentameric configuration in order to perform at its best. Only after numerous GM1 gangliosides have been simultaneously contacted does the improved avidity combine with the optimal sugar binding of two B subunits. The ability of the pentamer’s B subunits to engage with one another is enhanced by the pentasaccharide-CTB interaction [15,17,18].
Given that CTB is non-toxic and that its receptor is distributed throughout cells, this chemical makes an excellent delivery system. Numerous different cell types, including neurons, have GM1 [19]. When CTB is utilized in oral vaccination formulations, the presence of this ganglioside on antigen-presenting cells and the gut epithelial cells, which function as an important route of CTB absorption, is relevant to this review.
Apart from macrophages and dendritic cells [20], GM1 is also expressed by B cells, and upon CTB binding, expression of MHC class II is increased [21]. This dramatically increases the organism’s exposure to compounds related to and connected with CTB antigens. There are normally very few Ag-specific B cells in the entire B cell repertoire that are capable of efficiently capturing Ag through the B cell receptor (BCR), detecting the Ag, and directing it towards the MHC class II loading compartment in a homeostatic condition. Ag uptake by CTB and GM1 avoids this gap and may turn macrophages, dendritic cells, and the whole B cell compartment into potential antigen presenters.
Silkworms have been used to successfully produce more CTB fusion proteins. In one study, CTB fused to the 42 amino acid version of the amyloid-peptide A42 in this system was utilized to successfully diminish A42 deposition in the brain of animals used to imitate Alzheimer’s disease [22], and when given orally to the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse, a relevant type 1 diabetes model, a fusion product of CTB and insulin in the same system has been asserted to decrease insulitis and the formation of diabetes [23,24,25].
CTB is utilized as an adjuvant, and in order to do so successfully, it must be recombinantly fused to the target antigen. The C-terminal fusion to CTB was compared to the N-terminal fusion in a systemic analysis [26]. In this investigation, protein G from Streptococcus, a 25 KD fusion partner, had its serum albumin binding region (BB) fused either N- or C-terminally, or both at once. All three proteins were produced and formed pentamers, but the C-terminal fusion protein formed the best pentamers and had the highest affinity for GM1. This indicates that CTB is a very tolerant fusion partner. In the case that either CTB does not fold correctly, the pentamer does not form, or the ability to bind to GM1 is compromised, if this construct is co-expressed with wild-type CTB, an alternate approach can be utilized by substituting CTA1 with Ag and attaching it N-terminally to CTA2 [27]. The formation of a CTB pentamer allows CTA2 to enter through the tunnel created by CTB, leaving Ag sticking out of the ring structure. In light of the fact that this build keeps the CTB moiety unaltered, the GM1 binding by the pentamer is ideal. This technique also decreases the molecular ratio of Ag to the CTB pentamer from 5:1 to 1:1, which must be taken into account when comparing vaccine dosages of various fusion proteins. If numerous Ag molecules or peptide epitopes are not fused to one another along with CTA2, this method also results in a reduction of the molecular ratio of Ag to the CTB pentamer.
To prevent recombinant fusion, CTB and Ag can either be chemically coupled or supplied concurrently without being physically joined (Table 1). The protein can also be expressed and purified, or if expressed in plants, the purification phase can be omitted by developing an edible plant vaccine. Adding CTB to DNA vaccines is another way to prevent protein purification [28].

3. CTB in Transgenic Plants

Transgenic plants that express foreign proteins for industrial or therapeutic use can serve as an economical replacement for production techniques based on fermentation. Specific vaccines have been developed as a result of the transient or persistent expression of foreign genes in plants. Recent studies have shown that bacterial and viral pathogen antigens can be produced in plants while maintaining their original immunogenic characteristics. Transgenic potato tubers that produced a bacterial antigen caused humoral and mucosal immune reactions when provided as food. These results provide “proof of concept” for the synthesis of vaccines from plants [2,29,30,31].
Recombinant cell culture expression systems can be used to make subunit vaccines; however, these systems require fermentation technology and strict purification techniques to produce enough recombinant protein for oral administration. The cost of producing innovative oral vaccinations in underdeveloped countries may be prohibitive even with technological breakthroughs. An “edible vaccine,” created by transgenic plants that express antigens in their edible tissue, might be consumed to provide immunity.
In contrast to the bacterially expressed form, CTB has been successfully expressed in a variety of plant systems, including tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana), where the protein obtains glycosylated, most likely at position Asn25, which has no effect on the pentamer formation [32]. In this case, CTB was fused to the membrane proximal (ectodomain) region of gp41 (MPR649–684) and constituted about 0.14 percent of the total soluble protein, or around 20 mg per kg of fresh leaf material. The protein was immunogenic, and the authors noted that three doses were sufficient to raise vaginal IgA toward the protein, something they were unable to do in prior studies using bacterially expressed protein. Despite the lack of a direct side-by-side comparison with the bacterial version of the same construct in the study [32,33,34].
Expression of CTB has also been successful in rice to serve as a cholera vaccine [35,36,37], and when taken orally, it proved protective in mice and macaques. Instead of achieving its intended outcome of reducing the expression of rice allergens that might have negative effects on subjects, RNAi increased CTB expression in these plants by a factor of three. Concurrently with this, CTB’s intracellular localization changed. Plants with RNAi suppression were shown to have CTB in the cell wall, plasma membrane, and cytoplasm [38].
A different approach to subcellular localization in Nicotiana, i.e., expression in chloroplasts, has been chosen by Lakshmi et al. [39]. This was done by cloning CTB fused to Mycobacterium tuberculosis epitopes, specifically the 6 KD early secretory antigenic target (ESAT-6) and Mtb72F (a protein formed by the fusion of two tuberculosis antigens, Mtb32 and Mtb39), downstream of the psbA promoter that normally regulates expression of the protein D1 of Photosystem II. However, in that study, it was not examined whether the vaccine induced a protective immune response or not.
Functional GM1-binding pentamers were created by CTB in chloroplasts. It has also been successful to achieve CTB expression in the chloroplast through the use of targeting vectors that led to the insertion of CTB-coding DNA into chloroplast DNA. The expressed protein was found to make up 4% of the whole protein in the plant, and functional pentamers accumulated in the chloroplasts. However, as an entire plant extract rather than purified CTB was employed, no thorough comparative findings on the GM1 binding capacity could be formed. Both the bacterially expressed CTB and plant-expressed pentamers bound to GM1 in an ELISA format [31,39].
Transgenic potatoes were modified to produce cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) pentamers with affinity for GM1-ganglioside. Oral vaccination-treated mice produced intestinal and serum antibodies against CTB. Mucosal antibody titers rapidly declined after the previous immunization, but they gradually increased again following an oral transgenic potato booster. Cholera holotoxin (CT) had a cytotoxic effect on Vero cells until serum from animals immunized with transgenic potato tissues neutralized it. After intraileal injection with CT, the mice that had been vaccinated with plants showed a reduction of up to 60% in the buildup of diarrheal fluid in the small intestine. Protection against CT was based on blocking enterotoxin’s capacity to bind to the cell-surface receptor GM1-ganglioside [2,29].
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation was used to create transgenic potato plants using the expression vector pPCV70lluxF containing either the human insulin cDNA (INS) or the CTB-INS fusion gene, as described by Arakawa et al. [29]. The bidirectional mannopine synthase P2 promoter was placed next to a plant expression vector that contained a bacterial luciferase AB fusion gene (luxF) connected to the P1 promoter. The cholera toxin B subunit protein (CTB), which is coupled to an ER retention signal (SEKDEL), is encoded by this gene. Potato leaf explants were transformed by the vector-carrying Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and kanamycin-resistant plants were subsequently produced. The genomic DNA of bioluminescent plants’ CTB-SEKDEL fusion gene was located using polymerase chain reaction amplification. An immunoblot investigation revealed that oligomeric CTB molecules were the most frequently extracted molecular species from transgenic potato leaf and tuber tissues and that the CTB protein generated from plants was antigenically identical to the CTB protein found in bacteria. As with CTB created by bacteria, plant-made CTB splits into monomers when exposed to heat or acid. The highest level of CTB protein was discovered in auxin-induced transgenic potato leaf and tuber tissues, corresponding to about 0.3 percent of the total soluble plant protein. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods used in that study showed that plant-produced CTB protein had a specific affinity for GM1-ganglioside, the cholera toxin’s natural membrane receptor [2,17,18,29,34,40]. In potato tissues, CTB protein accumulates and forms an oligomeric form that retains its original biochemical and immunological properties when the SEKDEL signal is present.
Table 1. Adjuvant effect of CTB combined to tissue specific autoantigens.
Table 1. Adjuvant effect of CTB combined to tissue specific autoantigens.
Antigen.Fused to CTBAnimal Model, Pathogen or RouteResponseReference
Human ProinsulinC-terminalMonocyte-derived Dendritic cells (moDCs) Human, in vitroUpregulation of IDO1, Tolerogenic effect on DCs[41,42]
Human Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 55 (GAD55)C-terminal, Recombinant vaccinia virusNOD mouse, i.p., +/− CFAComparing the same vaccine without CFA to the same vaccine, diabetes was reduced by 50–20%.[43,44,45]
InsulinC-terminal, +/− GFPNOD Mouse50 % reduction in T1D incidence[46]
Myelin Basic Protein (MBP)C-terminal3X TgAD (Alzheimer’s Disease) Mice, Oral70% less amyloid buildup in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex[47]

4. How the Fusion Protein of Cholera Toxin B Subunit and Insulin, Made from Potatoes, Prevents the Onset of Autoimmune Diabetes

It has been demonstrated that oral administration of disease-specific autoantigens can halt or postpone the development of autoimmune disease symptoms [11,12,23,43,48,49]. Arakawa et al. have generated transgenic potato plants that synthesize human insulin, which is a major insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus autoantigen, at levels up to 0.05% of total soluble protein [2,3,29]. In this study, insulin was coupled to the C-terminus of the cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) to facilitate the distribution of plant-produced insulin to the lymphoid tissues associated with the gut. Transgenic potato tubers produced pentameric CTB-insulin fusion, which conserved the native antigenicity of both CTB and insulin as well as 0.1 percent of the total soluble protein. Nonobese diabetic mice given CTB-insulin fusion protein-infused altered potato tuber tissues showed markedly reduced pancreatic islet inflammation (insulitis) and a postponed onset of clinical diabetes. When insulin- or CTB-producing transgenic potato tissues were fed on their own, neither insulitis nor diabetic symptoms were noticeably lessened. The results of the experiments suggest that food plants can be used as both a source and a vehicle for immune tolerance against this T cell-mediated autoimmune illness.
The pentameric shape of the CTB fusion protein increases the molar concentration of the antigen per CTB pentamer molecule in addition to enabling site-specific delivery and the presentation of conjugated proteins to the GALT. The traditional necessity for high levels of antigen biosynthesis in the food plant for effective vaccine manufacture may be greatly decreased as a result of the enhanced antigen concentration in the GALT. The proinsulin was coupled with CTB via the flexible hinge peptide to minimize steric hindrance between the CTB and insulin moieties and enhance CTB subunit production in plant cells [50].
On the basis of the NOD mice’s induction of both systemic and intestinal anti-CTB antibodies after being fed altered potato tubers that contain the CTB-INS fusion protein, it is possible that the fusion protein was successfully transported to the intestinal immune system. The discovery of an elevated serum anti-insulin IgG antibody titer provided more evidence in favor of this assertion. The humoral reaction mounted against the CTB and insulin proteins may be a secondary outcome of oral tolerance’s stimulation of Th cells [12,39,43,51,52].
Serum anti-insulin IgG1 antibodies were more frequently induced when mice were fed transgenic potato tissues that produced the CTB-INS fusion protein than IgG2a antibodies, demonstrating that the immune response was biased toward an insulin-specific Th2 lymphocyte response and that the observed oral tolerance was mediated by active suppression [2,53].
According to this study, autoimmune diabetes can be successfully prevented by giving NOD mice very small amounts of food that contains insulin made by plants and conjugated with a CTB subunit. The significance of oral antigen dose and the contribution of CTB to the induction of oral tolerance are highlighted by the efficacy of the plant-produced CTB-INS fusion protein at doses at least 100 times lower than those generally reported for unconjugated autoantigens [48,54].
Due to their ability to control tolerance to food antigens, limit reactivity to the gut microbiota, and mediate tolerance to food antigens, dendritic cells (DCs) are essential for an efficient response to intestinal infections. Intestinal DCs can promote regulatory and effector T cell responses despite their diversity. The actions taken by functionally different DC subsets and how environmental cues influence those actions determine the results in a particular circumstance. DCs continuously sample luminal content to look for infections, but the relevance of the various paths by which this occurs is not entirely known. The distinct traits of intestinal DCs are controlled by local host, nutritional, and microbial cues. The ability to produce all-trans retinoic acid (RA) and activate T lymphocytes with gut tropism are two examples of these traits [55]. Due to their ability to activate TGF beta and generate RA, intestinal DC subsets are potent inducible Treg inducers in the steady state. Responses elicited by steady-state intestinal DCs are not entirely regulatory in character, despite the presence of effector T cells with a preference for commensal bacteria in healthy mucosa and their ability to be locally controlled to stop inflammation [56].
To enhance effector responses in an infection or maintain inflammation in a disease, intestinal DCs probably need to both change the current DC population and attract new populations. The etiology of inflammatory bowel disease can be linked to immune pathways, and in inflamed intestinal tissue, DCs show enhanced microbial recognition machinery expression, activation, and mediator synthesis. Intestinal DCs may be targeted for better vaccination responses or disease treatment [57].
Tryptophan is an essential amino acid, and indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO1) is the first and only catabolic enzyme that can degrade it. IDO breaks down the aromatic indole ring of tryptophan, resulting in the production of a number of tryptophan breakdown metabolites known as “kynurenines.” These chemicals have been found to significantly influence immune regulation. Since tryptophan must be received through diet, managing how it is metabolized can significantly affect how the body uses energy and how the immune system responds [58]. By depleting tryptophan, reducing cellular energy, and producing released kynurenines, which are known to effectively trigger pro-inflammatory T cell death, indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase was discovered to limit DC maturation (Figure 1) [41].
According to earlier research, transgenic DCs with high levels of IDO1 expression and tryptophan metabolites (such as l-kynurenine, 3-hydroxykynurenine, and 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid) can permanently decrease allogeneic T cell proliferation in vitro, including Th 17 [59,60,61], and lead to an increased recruitment of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T regulatory (Treg) cells within the site of antigen presentation [62,63,64]. Th17 cells are characterized by their production of interleukin-17 (IL-17) and other pro-inflammatory cytokines. They are involved in immune responses against pathogens at mucosal surfaces, but their dysregulation can lead to chronic inflammation and tissue damage, promoting autoimmune disorders [65].
IDO1 was found to be significantly up-regulated in vaccine-inoculated DCs in a recent study using immature human dendritic cells (iDC) co-cultured with CTB-INS. Immunosuppressive enzyme production was greatly boosted by the CTB-INS fusion protein when compared to DCs that had been exposed to proinsulin, CTB, or an unlinked mixture of the two proteins [41].
According to current research, CTB-INS promotes TNFR signaling and induces IDO1 production in human DCs, which may be the mechanism by which it modulates DC activation. Examining IDO1 production caused by CTB-INS in vaccine-stimulated DCs was made possible by blocking the TNFR pathway [42]. In this recent study, peptides comprising the amino acid sequences of the TRAF2, 3, and TRAF6 binding sites for CD40 were treated with monocyte derived DCs. Following that, CD40 ligand (CD154) and CTB-INS were used to activate the DCs. Blocking peptides for CD40-TRAF2, 3, and CD40-TRAF6 were added, and this prevented IDO1 production from being upregulated in response to either the CD154 ligand or CTB-INS. Combining TRAF2, 3, and TRAF6 inhibitors resulted in the highest decrease in IDO1 production.
The specific immune-unresponsive condition is enhanced in mice after oral administration of the cholera toxin B (CTB) subunit conjugated to the autoantigen insulin. Oral tolerance is what it is known as, and it can suppress autoimmune type 1 diabetes (T1D). The mechanism through which the CTB-insulin (CTB-INS) protein functions as a treatment for T1D in vivo, however, is still unknown. However, recent articles have provided a number of hints. Within organized lymphoid tissue, intestinal cDCs are involved in mediating tolerance to dietary antigens, limiting responsiveness to the gut microbiota, and being necessary for an effective response to intestinal infections. Although intestinal DCs are diverse, they together induce responses from regulatory and effector T cells. In nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice, oral treatment of the CTB-INS protein was recently found to generate exceptional tolerance, postpone the onset of diabetic symptoms, and decrease the start of T1D. Through the non-canonical NF-ĸB pathway, it has been demonstrated to increase levels of the immunosuppressive and tolerogenic enzyme IDO1 in dendritic cells and reduce levels of CD86 costimulatory factors [41,42]. The by-products of resulting tryptophan catabolism, known as kynurenines, are known to cause an increase in CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T regulatory (Treg) cells within the GALT.

5. Conclusions

Edible vaccines are ingested as food and offer advantages in safety and production. They rely on the plant’s life cycle and hold potential for controlling diseases. The mechanism of action is still being studied, but evidence suggests that oral administration can induce immune responses and suppress autoimmune diabetes. Intestinal dendritic cells play a role in tolerance and response to infections. While concerns exist about genetically modified plants and cross-contamination, thorough monitoring can address these risks. Edible vaccines have significant benefits and require further research for enhanced disease control. Plant-based vaccine production holds promise for preventing global epidemics.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the writing of this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Atkinson, M.A.; Eisenbarth, G.S.; Michels, A.W. Type 1 diabetes. Lancet 2014, 383, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arakawa, T.; Chong, D.K.; Langridge, W.H. Efficacy of a food plant-based oral cholera toxin B subunit vaccine. Nat. Biotechnol. 1998, 16, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arakawa, T.; Yu, J.; Langridge, W.H. Food plant-delivered cholera toxin B subunit for vaccination and immunotolerization. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1999, 464, 161–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yuki, Y.; Nojima, M.; Hosono, O.; Tanaka, H.; Kimura, Y.; Satoh, T.; Imoto, S.; Uematsu, S.; Kurokawa, S.; Kashima, K.; et al. Oral MucoRice-CTB vaccine for safety and microbiota-dependent immunogenicity in humans: A phase 1 randomised trial. Lancet Microbe 2021, 2, e429–e440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Trentham, D.E.; Dynesius-Trentham, R.A.; Orav, E.J.; Combitchi, D.; Lorenzo, C.; Sewell, K.L.; Hafler, D.A.; Weiner, H.L. Effects of oral administration of type II collagen on rheumatoid arthritis. Science 1993, 261, 1727–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weiner, H.L.; Mackin, G.A.; Matsui, M.; Orav, E.J.; Khoury, S.J.; Dawson, D.M.; Hafler, D.A. Double-blind pilot trial of oral tolerization with myelin antigens in multiple sclerosis. Science 1993, 259, 1321–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Weiner, H.L.; Friedman, A.; Miller, A.; Khoury, S.J.; al-Sabbagh, A.; Santos, L.; Sayegh, M.; Nussenblatt, R.B.; Trentham, D.E.; Hafler, D.A. Oral tolerance: Immunologic mechanisms and treatment of animal and human organ-specific autoimmune diseases by oral administration of autoantigens. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1994, 12, 809–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, Z.J.; Davidson, L.; Eisenbarth, G.; Weiner, H.L. Suppression of diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice by oral administration of porcine insulin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 10252–10256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Carel, J.C.; Bougnères, P.; Vardi, P. Suppression of diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice by oral administration of porcine insulin. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 1994, 17, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, J.B.; Holmgren, J.; Czerkinsky, C. Cholera toxin B subunit: An efficient transmucosal carrier-delivery system for induction of peripheral immunological tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 10795–10799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Holmgren, J.; Adamsson, J.; Anjuère, F.; Clemens, J.; Czerkinsky, C.; Eriksson, K.; Flach, C.F.; George-Chandy, A.; Harandi, A.M.; Lebens, M.; et al. Mucosal adjuvants and anti-infection and anti-immunopathology vaccines based on cholera toxin, cholera toxin B subunit and CpG DNA. Immunol. Lett. 2005, 97, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sun, J.B.; Czerkinsky, C.; Holmgren, J. Mucosally induced immunological tolerance, regulatory T cells and the adjuvant effect by cholera toxin B subunit. Scand. J. Immunol. 2010, 71, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, J.B.; Rask, C.; Olsson, T.; Holmgren, J.; Czerkinsky, C. Treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by feeding myelin basic protein conjugated to cholera toxin B subunit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 7196–7201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lönnroth, I.; Holmgren, J. Subunit structure of cholera toxin. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1973, 76, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sixma, T.K.; Kalk, K.H.; van Zanten, B.A.; Dauter, Z.; Kingma, J.; Witholt, B.; Hol, W.G. Refined structure of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin, a close relative of cholera toxin. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 230, 890–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chester, M.A. IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN). Nomenclature of glycolipids–recommendations 1997. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 257, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Schön, A.; Freire, E. Thermodynamics of intersubunit interactions in cholera toxin upon binding to the oligosaccharide portion of its cell surface receptor, ganglioside GM1. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 5019–5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Goins, B.; Freire, E. Thermal stability and intersubunit interactions of cholera toxin in solution and in association with its cell-surface receptor ganglioside GM1. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 2046–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kozireski-Chuback, D.; Wu, G.; Ledeen, R.W. Developmental appearance of nuclear GM1 in neurons of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1999, 115, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moreno-Altamirano, M.M.; Aguilar-Carmona, I.; Sánchez-García, F.J. Expression of GM1, a marker of lipid rafts, defines two subsets of human monocytes with differential endocytic capacity and lipopolysaccharide responsiveness. Immunology 2007, 120, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Francis, M.L.; Ryan, J.; Jobling, M.G.; Holmes, R.K.; Moss, J.; Mond, J.J. Cyclic AMP-independent effects of cholera toxin on B cell activation. II. Binding of ganglioside GM1 induces B cell activation. J. Immunol. 1992, 148, 1999–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, S.; Wei, Z.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Lv, Z.; Yu, W.; Meng, Q.; Jin, Y. Oral administration of a fusion protein between the cholera toxin B subunit and the 42-amino acid isoform of amyloid-β peptide produced in silkworm pupae protects against Alzheimer's disease in mice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gong, Z.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, Y. Suppression of diabetes in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice by oral administration of a cholera toxin B subunit-insulin B chain fusion protein vaccine produced in silkworm. Vaccine 2007, 25, 1444–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gong, Z.H.; Jin, H.Q.; Jin, Y.F.; Zhang, Y.Z. Expression of cholera toxin B subunit and assembly as functional oligomers in silkworm. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 38, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gong, Z.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, Y. Oral administration of a cholera toxin B subunit-insulin fusion protein produced in silkworm protects against autoimmune diabetes. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 119, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liljeqvist, S.; Ståhl, S.; Andréoni, C.; Binz, H.; Uhlén, M.; Murby, M. Fusions to the cholera toxin B subunit: Influence on pentamerization and GM1 binding. J. Immunol. Methods 1997, 210, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hajishengallis, G.; Hollingshead, S.K.; Koga, T.; Russell, M.W. Mucosal immunization with a bacterial protein antigen genetically coupled to cholera toxin A2/B subunits. J. Immunol. 1995, 154, 4322–4332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lavelle, E.C.; Ward, R.W. Mucosal vaccines-fortifying the frontiers. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022, 22, 236–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arakawa, T.; Chong, D.K.; Merritt, J.L.; Langridge, W.H. Expression of cholera toxin B subunit oligomers in transgenic potato plants. Transgenic Res. 1997, 6, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mor, T.S.; Gómez-Lim, M.A.; Palmer, K.E. Perspective: Edible vaccines—A concept coming of age. Trends Microbiol. 1998, 6, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Daniell, H.; Lee, S.B.; Panchal, T.; Wiebe, P.O. Expression of the native cholera toxin B subunit gene and assembly as functional oligomers in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 311, 1001–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Matoba, N.; Kajiura, H.; Cherni, I.; Doran, J.D.; Bomsel, M.; Fujiyama, K.; Mor, T.S. Biochemical and immunological characterization of the plant-derived candidate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mucosal vaccine CTB-MPR. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2009, 7, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Matoba, N.; Magérus, A.; Geyer, B.C.; Zhang, Y.; Muralidharan, M.; Alfsen, A.; Arntzen, C.J.; Bomsel, M.; Mor, T.S. A mucosally targeted subunit vaccine candidate eliciting HIV-1 transcytosis-blocking Abs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 13584–13589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Matoba, N.; Griffin, T.A.; Mittman, M.; Doran, J.D.; Alfsen, A.; Montefiori, D.C.; Hanson, C.V.; Bomsel, M.; Mor, T.S. Transcytosis-blocking abs elicited by an oligomeric immunogen based on the membrane proximal region of HIV-1 gp41 target non-neutralizing epitopes. Curr. HIV Res. 2008, 6, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nochi, T.; Takagi, H.; Yuki, Y.; Yang, L.; Masumura, T.; Mejima, M.; Nakanishi, U.; Matsumura, A.; Uozumi, A.; Hiroi, T.; et al. Rice-based mucosal vaccine as a global strategy for cold-chain- and needle-free vaccination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 10986–10991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nochi, T.; Yuki, Y.; Katakai, Y.; Shibata, H.; Tokuhara, D.; Mejima, M.; Kurokawa, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Nakanishi, U.; Ono, F.; et al. A rice-based oral cholera vaccine induces macaque-specific systemic neutralizing antibodies but does not influence pre-existing intestinal immunity. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 6538–6544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yuki, Y.; Tokuhara, D.; Nochi, T.; Yasuda, H.; Mejima, M.; Kurokawa, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Kataoka, N.; Nakanishi, U.; Hagiwara, Y.; et al. Oral MucoRice expressing double-mutant cholera toxin A and B subunits induces toxin-specific neutralising immunity. Vaccine 2009, 27, 5982–5988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kurokawa, S.; Kuroda, M.; Mejima, M.; Nakamura, R.; Takahashi, Y.; Sagara, H.; Takeyama, N.; Satoh, S.; Kiyono, H.; Teshima, R.; et al. RNAi-mediated suppression of endogenous storage proteins leads to a change in localization of overexpressed cholera toxin B-subunit and the allergen protein RAG2 in rice seeds. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lakshmi, P.S.; Verma, D.; Yang, X.; Lloyd, B.; Daniell, H. Low cost tuberculosis vaccine antigens in capsules: Expression in chloroplasts, bio-encapsulation, stability and functional evaluation in vitro. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Carter, J.E.; Yu, J.; Choi, N.W.; Hough, J.; Henderson, D.; He, D.; Langridge, W.H. Bacterial and plant enterotoxin B subunit-autoantigen fusion proteins suppress diabetes insulitis. Mol. Biotechnol. 2006, 32, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mbongue, J.C.; Nicholas, D.A.; Zhang, K.; Kim, N.S.; Hamilton, B.N.; Larios, M.; Zhang, G.; Umezawa, K.; Firek, A.F.; Langridge, W.H. Induction of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase in human dendritic cells by a cholera toxin B subunit-proinsulin vaccine. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, N.S.; Mbongue, J.C.; Nicholas, D.A.; Esebanmen, G.E.; Unternaehrer, J.J.; Firek, A.F.; Langridge, W.H. Chimeric Vaccine Stimulation of Human Dendritic Cell Indoleamine 2, 3-Dioxygenase Occurs via the Non-Canonical NF-κB Pathway. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dénes, B.; Fodor, I.; Langridge, W.H. Autoantigens plus interleukin-10 suppress diabetes autoimmunity. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2010, 12, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Langridge, W.; Dénes, B.; Fodor, I. Cholera toxin B subunit modulation of mucosal vaccines for infectious and autoimmune diseases. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2010, 11, 919–928. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Dénes, B.; Fodor, I.; Langridge, W.H. Persistent suppression of type 1 diabetes by a multicomponent vaccine containing a cholera toxin B subunit-autoantigen fusion protein and complete Freund’s adjuvant. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2013, 2013, 578786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Meng, Q.; Wang, W.; Shi, X.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, Y. Protection against autoimmune diabetes by silkworm-produced GFP-tagged CTB-insulin fusion protein. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2011, 2011, 831704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kohli, N.; Westerveld, D.R.; Ayache, A.C.; Verma, A.; Shil, P.; Prasad, T.; Zhu, P.; Chan, S.L.; Li, Q.; Daniell, H. Oral delivery of bioencapsulated proteins across blood-brain and blood-retinal barriers. Mol. Ther. 2014, 22, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ploix, C.; Bergerot, I.; Durand, A.; Czerkinsky, C.; Holmgren, J.; Thivolet, C. Oral administration of cholera toxin B-insulin conjugates protects NOD mice from autoimmune diabetes by inducing CD4+ regulatory T-cells. Diabetes 1999, 48, 2150–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Aspord, C.; Thivolet, C. Nasal administration of CTB-insulin induces active tolerance against autoimmune diabetes in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2002, 130, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lipscombe, M.; Charles, I.G.; Roberts, M.; Dougan, G.; Tite, J.; Fairweather, N.F. Intranasal immunization using the B subunit of the Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin fused to an epitope of the Bordetella pertussis P.69 antigen. Mol. Microbiol. 1991, 5, 1385–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Odumosu, O.; Nicholas, D.; Payne, K.; Langridge, W. Cholera toxin B subunit linked to glutamic acid decarboxylase suppresses dendritic cell maturation and function. Vaccine 2011, 29, 8451–8458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Odumosu, O.; Payne, K.; Baez, I.; Jutzy, J.; Wall, N.; Langridge, W. Suppression of dendritic cell activation by diabetes autoantigens linked to the cholera toxin B subunit. Immunobiology 2011, 216, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, Y.; Inobe, J.; Marks, R.; Gonnella, P.; Kuchroo, V.K.; Weiner, H.L. Peripheral deletion of antigen-reactive T cells in oral tolerance. Nature 1995, 376, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bergerot, I.; Ploix, C.; Petersen, J.; Moulin, V.; Rask, C.; Fabien, N.; Lindblad, M.; Mayer, A.; Czerkinsky, C.; Holmgren, J.; et al. A cholera toxoid-insulin conjugate as an oral vaccine against spontaneous autoimmune diabetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 4610–4614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wehr, P.; Purvis, H.; Law, S.C.; Thomas, R. Dendritic cells, T cells and their interaction in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2019, 196, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Stagg, A.J. Intestinal Dendritic Cells in Health and Gut Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mbongue, J.; Nicholas, D.; Firek, A.; Langridge, W. The role of dendritic cells in tissue-specific autoimmunity. J. Immunol. Res. 2014, 2014, 857143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mbongue, J.C.; Nicholas, D.A.; Torrez, T.W.; Kim, N.S.; Firek, A.F.; Langridge, W.H. The Role of Indoleamine 2, 3-Dioxygenase in Immune Suppression and Autoimmunity. Vaccines 2015, 3, 703–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Grohmann, U.; Fallarino, F.; Puccetti, P. Tolerance, DCs and tryptophan: Much ado about IDO. Trends Immunol. 2003, 24, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fallarino, F.; Grohmann, U.; You, S.; McGrath, B.C.; Cavener, D.R.; Vacca, C.; Orabona, C.; Bianchi, R.; Belladonna, M.L.; Volpi, C.; et al. The combined effects of tryptophan starvation and tryptophan catabolites down-regulate T cell receptor zeta-chain and induce a regulatory phenotype in naive T cells. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 6752–6761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Terness, P.; Bauer, T.M.; Röse, L.; Dufter, C.; Watzlik, A.; Simon, H.; Opelz, G. Inhibition of allogeneic T cell proliferation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing dendritic cells: Mediation of suppression by tryptophan metabolites. J. Exp. Med. 2002, 196, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Mellor, A.L.; Lemos, H.; Huang, L. Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase and Tolerance: Where Are We Now? Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Puccetti, P.; Grohmann, U. IDO and regulatory T cells: A role for reverse signalling and non-canonical NF-kappaB activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 7, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Baban, B.; Chandler, P.R.; Sharma, M.D.; Pihkala, J.; Koni, P.A.; Munn, D.H.; Mellor, A.L. IDO activates regulatory T cells and blocks their conversion into Th17-like T cells. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 2475–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Singh, B.; Summers, K.L.; Kerfoot, S.M. Novel regulatory Th17 cells and regulatory B cells in modulating autoimmune diseases. Cell. Immunol. 2019, 339, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Proposed mechanism for the CTB-INS edible vaccine. Created with BioRender.com. Oral Administration: The CTB-INS vaccine is orally administered, typically through ingestion or ingestion of a plant-based product containing the vaccine. Uptake in the Gut: After oral administration, the vaccine components, including the cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) and the insulin antigen (INS), are taken up by specialized cells in the gut, such as M cells or dendritic cells (DCs). Presentation to Immune Cells: The gut-associated DCs capture the vaccine antigens and migrate to the lymphoid tissues, such as Peyer’s patches, mesenteric lymph nodes, or other lymphoid organs. Production of IDO: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is an enzyme involved in the metabolism of tryptophan. The presence of IDO and IL10 induced by the CTB-INS vaccine promotes the migration of Tregs in the gut. IDO plays a key role in immune tolerance by regulating T cell responses and maintaining immune balance through Treg migration, which plays a crucial role in immune regulation and tolerance via the inhibition of Th1, Th2, and Th17 and B cell autoantibody production.
Figure 1. Proposed mechanism for the CTB-INS edible vaccine. Created with BioRender.com. Oral Administration: The CTB-INS vaccine is orally administered, typically through ingestion or ingestion of a plant-based product containing the vaccine. Uptake in the Gut: After oral administration, the vaccine components, including the cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) and the insulin antigen (INS), are taken up by specialized cells in the gut, such as M cells or dendritic cells (DCs). Presentation to Immune Cells: The gut-associated DCs capture the vaccine antigens and migrate to the lymphoid tissues, such as Peyer’s patches, mesenteric lymph nodes, or other lymphoid organs. Production of IDO: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is an enzyme involved in the metabolism of tryptophan. The presence of IDO and IL10 induced by the CTB-INS vaccine promotes the migration of Tregs in the gut. IDO plays a key role in immune tolerance by regulating T cell responses and maintaining immune balance through Treg migration, which plays a crucial role in immune regulation and tolerance via the inhibition of Th1, Th2, and Th17 and B cell autoantibody production.
Immuno 03 00014 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mbongue, J.C.; Vanterpool, E.; Langridge, W.H.R. Exploring the Potential of Plant-Based CTB-INS Oral Vaccines in Treating Type 1 Diabetes. Immuno 2023, 3, 217-227. https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno3020014

AMA Style

Mbongue JC, Vanterpool E, Langridge WHR. Exploring the Potential of Plant-Based CTB-INS Oral Vaccines in Treating Type 1 Diabetes. Immuno. 2023; 3(2):217-227. https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno3020014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mbongue, Jacques C., Elaine Vanterpool, and William H. R. Langridge. 2023. "Exploring the Potential of Plant-Based CTB-INS Oral Vaccines in Treating Type 1 Diabetes" Immuno 3, no. 2: 217-227. https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno3020014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop