Next Article in Journal
Biobased Polyurethane Coatings for Corrosion Protection of Carbon Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Cell Culture Bioreactor Manufacturing, from Material Selection to Numerical Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

In Vitro Bacterial Adhesion on 316L Medical Grade Stainless Steel with Two Surface Finishes †

by
António Fróis
1,2,
Emanuel Cardoso
1,3,
Paula V. Morais
3,
Romeu Francisco
3,* and
Cristina Santos Louro
1,*
1
Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, Rua Luis Reis Santos, 3030-177 Coimbra, Portugal
2
Faculty of Medicine, Biophysics Institute, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research/Centre for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (iCBR/CIBB), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
3
Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE), Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Materiais 2022, Marinha Grande, Portugal, 10–13 April 2022.
Mater. Proc. 2022, 8(1), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022008049
Published: 30 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of MATERIAIS 2022)
All metallic alloys corrode in the human body. In the specific case of oral cavities, multiple factors—such as diet, hygiene, and health—create an extreme corrosion-promoting environment. The result is the release of metallic ions, some of which, such as Nickel (Ni), exert allergic, mutagenic, cytotoxic, or carcinogenic effects. In modern orthodontics, fixed appliances are commonly manufactured by using stainless steel and NiTi, which show proper mechanical properties and rely on passivation mechanisms to resist corrosion. However, their metallic degradation is inevitable. In particular, biofilm formation can promote intraoral corrosion by generating three types of microcells: those with varying degrees of oxygenation; those with different concentrations of metallic ions; and active-passive cells. The pitting susceptibility of the alloys may thus increase, as well as the wear on the surfaces under sliding [1,2]. However, the clinical effects are still not fully understood. Allergies to Ni, for instance, clearly may occur, but their real extent is controversial. In this study, the in vitro bacterial adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was evaluated on medical grade SS 316L (AISI) with two different surface finishes: roughing, as received by the supplier (surface A), and mirror-polished, with a 3 µm diamond suspension (surface B). Samples were analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy coupled with Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) to obtain information on cell morphology, biofilm formation and surface density, while providing insights into material corrosion. Surface colonization was estimated by Colony Forming Unit (CFU) plate counts. The results show that the surface colonization of surface B was significantly better than on surface A. One explanation is related to an easier cell stacking and anchorage through the adhesive extracellular matrix. In this way, P. aeruginosa managed to attach in a higher quantity, forming thick, densely populated colonization structures. In contrast, B. subtilis showed a low adhesion to the SS surface, regardless the surface finish type. Future work will study the impact of protective hydrogenate amorphous carbon (a-C:H)-based coatings on bacterial adhesion to investigate their effectiveness against microbiologically induced corrosion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S.L.; methodology, R.F.; software, E.C.; validation, R.F..; formal analysis, E.C. and R.F..; investigation, A.F., E.C. and R.F.; resources, C.S.L. and P.V.M.; data curation, E.C. and R.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.F.; writing—review and editing, C.S.L., R.F. and P.V.M.; visualization, E.C. and R.F.; supervision, C.S.L. and R.F.; project administration, C.S.L.; funding acquisition, C.S.L. and P.V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is sponsored by national funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, through PhD grant SFRH/BD/143905/2019 attributed to A. Fróis, and through the projects UIDB/00285/2020 and UID/EMS/00285/2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mystkowska, J.; Niemirowicz-Laskowska, K.; Łysik, D.; Tokajuk, G.; Dąbrowski, J.R.; Bucki, R. The role of oral cavity biofilm on metallic biomaterial surface destruction–corrosion and friction aspects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Fróis, A.; Evaristo, M.; Santos, A.C.; Louro, C.S. Salivary pH Effect on Orthodontic Appliances: In Vitro Study of the SS/DLC System. Coatings 2021, 11, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fróis, A.; Cardoso, E.; Morais, P.V.; Francisco, R.; Louro, C.S. In Vitro Bacterial Adhesion on 316L Medical Grade Stainless Steel with Two Surface Finishes. Mater. Proc. 2022, 8, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022008049

AMA Style

Fróis A, Cardoso E, Morais PV, Francisco R, Louro CS. In Vitro Bacterial Adhesion on 316L Medical Grade Stainless Steel with Two Surface Finishes. Materials Proceedings. 2022; 8(1):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022008049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fróis, António, Emanuel Cardoso, Paula V. Morais, Romeu Francisco, and Cristina Santos Louro. 2022. "In Vitro Bacterial Adhesion on 316L Medical Grade Stainless Steel with Two Surface Finishes" Materials Proceedings 8, no. 1: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022008049

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop