Next Article in Journal
Investigation of the Dielectric Response of PPy/V2C MXene–ZnO Using Quantum Mechanical Calculations
Previous Article in Journal
Camellia-sinensis- and Cocos-nucifera-Derived Gold Nanoparticles for Treatment of Infections Caused by Antibiotic-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus 
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Electron-Beam Radiation Effects in Multilayer Structures Grown with the Periodical Deposition of Si and CaF2 on Si(111) †

by
Anatoly V. Dvurechenskii
1,2,*,
Aleksey V. Kacyuba
1,
Gennady N. Kamaev
1,
Vladimir A. Volodin
1,2,
Natalia P. Stepina
1,
Aigul F. Zinovieva
1,2 and
Vladimir A. Zinovyev
1
1
Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
2
Department of Physics, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Online Conference on Nanomaterials, 5–19 May 2023; Available online: https://iocn2023.sciforum.net.
Mater. Proc. 2023, 14(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2023-14481
Published: 5 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Online Conference on Nanomaterials)

Abstract

:
The formation of CaSi2 films on Si(111) with the molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) of CaF2 under fast electron-beam irradiation was investigated. The method of a high-planarity CaSi2 film synthesis assisted by electron-beam irradiation was developed. We combined two approaches to reduce the film roughness: the post-growth electron irradiation and codeposition of additional Si during CaF2 growth. The application of the solid-phase epitaxy technique at the initial stage of film growth allowed for us to reduce surface roughness down to 1–2 nm.

1. Introduction

CaF2 and CaSi2 materials have a slight difference in the parameters of the crystal lattice with silicon [1] that allows for the epitaxial growth of the multilayer heterostructures based on these materials on silicon substrates. The possibility of obtaining multilayer structures with conducting CaSi2 layers separated by a CaF2 dielectric can be used for the development of future nanoelectronic devices. There are quite a few works devoted to the study of this system. Calcium silicide films obtained on Si(111) and Si(001) surfaces can have different phase compositions. With the simultaneous deposition of Ca and Si on a hot substrate with increasing temperature, a phase tends to form with the highest silicon content, i.e., Ca2Si–CaSi–CaSi2. Ca2Si films are narrow-band semiconductor materials, and CaSi and CaSi2 films are semimetals. On the basis of these silicides, approaches to obtaining materials with various functional properties are being developed [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Recently, we proposed a method for CaSi2 synthesis using electron-beam irradiation during the growth of CaF2 layers with molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) [14,15]. The method is based on the electron-beam-stimulated decomposition of CaF2 into Ca and F [16] in the surface layers. Fluorine is desorbed from the surface, and the remaining calcium atoms bind chemically with silicon atoms that come from the Si substrate at sufficiently high temperatures (>300 °C) under electron irradiation [9]. Calcium silicide produced in this way is a nonhomogeneous three-dimensional material representing a triangular network of elongated crystallites protruding from the surface of the CaF2 film by tens of nanometers. These crystallites are oriented along the {110} directions and have a characteristic length of ~1 µm. The situation is similar to that of CaSi2 films grown by Braungart and Sigmund [17], who exposed a heated Si substrate to Ca vapor. We recently found a way to produce more homogeneous CaSi2 films [18]. The idea is to introduce additional intermediate silicon layers into the growing CaF2 film. The preliminary results showed that, under certain conditions, CaSi2 film growth under simultaneous e-beam irradiation can occur in a layer-by-layer mode. In addition, we tested another opportunity to increase the CaSi2 film homogeneity via post-growth electron irradiation after CaF2 deposition [19]. So far, however, there has been no notable success in this direction. Both types of structures, obtained with electron irradiation during CaF2 epitaxial growth and after CaF2 film formation, revealed the problem of high surface roughness. The average surface roughness in the irradiated region is 6–8 nm for films irradiated during CaF2 film growth, and 25–30 nm for films formed with post-growth irradiation (the values are given for the same thickness of the deposited film, irradiation dose, and substrate temperature). These data indicate that the considered methods do not provide the necessary planarity of CaSi2 epitaxial films.
The purpose of this work is to develop the synthesis method of a high-planarity CaSi2 film assisted by electron-beam irradiation. We combined two approaches to reduce the film roughness, a post-growth electron irradiation and codeposition of additional Si during CaF2 growth. Following Morar and Wittmer [1,20], we applied the technique of solid-phase epitaxy with subsequent annealing at the initial stage of film growth that allowed for us to reduce surface roughness down to 1–2 nm.

2. Materials and Methods

The experiments were carried out on a Katun-100 molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) unit equipped with a CaF2 effusion source with a graphite crucible under ultrahigh vacuum conditions. Films were grown on an Si(111) substrate. For all samples, the standard procedure of double surface cleaning was performed before the growth [18]. The crystal structure of the deposited layers was studied via the rapid high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) method. Electron-beam irradiation was performed with accelerating voltage of 20 Kev and current density of 50 µA/cm2. The beam incidence angle was 4°. The same electron beam was used to modify the properties of the growing film. Epitaxial CaF2 film growth was carried out at a deposition rate of 0.3 Å/s and consisted of two steps. At the first step, a 2 nm thick CaF2 layer was deposited at room temperature. Then, this amorphous layer was crystallized via annealing at 700 °C. The crystallization process was controlled with RHEED. At the second step, a multilayer structure containing 10 Si layers with 1 nm thickness separated by 2 nm thick CaF2 layers was grown at 550 °C. At the top of this structure, a 2 nm thick CaF2 layer was deposited. At the next step, structures were subjected to post-growth electron irradiation with different exposure times (10, 20, and 60 min). During post-growth irradiation, the electron beam did not shift, that is, the same area was irradiated as during growth. The thickness of the grown films was controlled with ellipsometry. The phase composition was determined on the basis of the Raman light scattering method. Surface morphology was studied using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). To highlight the effect of silicon codeposition on the resulting smoothing effect of the film, we carried out a test experiment in which we grew the film under the same growth conditions, but without silicon codeposition. Conductivity and magnetoresistance were measured on the strips as a function of the post-growth electron irradiation time. Contacts for the transport measurements were created by soldering silver wires using an indium solder. The temperature dependences of the conductivity were measured using an SR850 synchronous amplifier in a transport helium Dewar vessel. Magnetoresistance was measured in a magnetic field of up to 4 T.

3. Results and Discussion

RHEED studies confirmed that annealing at 700 °C leads to the recrystallization of CaF2 film deposited at room temperature (Figure 1a,b). RHEED data demonstrate that the further growth of a multilayer structure at 550 °C under electron irradiation resulted in the formation of a crystalline film (Figure 1c). Post-growth irradiation for 10 and 20 min did not induce any changes in RHEED images, while longer electron exposure led to additional RHEED reflexes, indicating a change in surface reconstruction (Figure 1d).
The AFM and SEM studies of the first type of structure show that, in the chosen growth conditions (codeposition of additional Si during CaF2 growth under electron irradiation), flat, hexagonal islands of CaSi2 formed instead of elongated crystallites. The characteristic size of the islands was ~300–400 nm. The post-growth irradiation led to an increase in the number and size of islands. Figure 2 demonstrates the SEM images of the surface of the as-grown film and after post-growth irradiation. An increase in irradiation dose clearly led to the islands overlapping and having a tendency to form a continuous film. However, if the exposure time was too long, the surface relief changed, and the film became less planar due to the appearance of three-dimensional ripples. For example, after 60 min irradiation, the average surface roughness was 6 nm. Results of AFM studies (Figure 3) show that the best planarity (lowest surface roughness ≈1 nm) was obtained for films with 20 min electron irradiation.
The test experiment in which we grew the film in the same growth conditions but without Si codeposition demonstrates that the exclusion of Si codeposition resulted in worse film planarity. For the film obtained after a 20 min post-growth electron irradiation, the average surface roughness increased up to 5–6 nm. This result is in agreement with existing literature data on CaSi2 growth via calcium deposition on Si substrates. Vogg et al. [21] reported that, by increasing the calcium flux and lowering the substrate temperature, one can achieve selective growth in the preferential direction and essentially switch from two- to three-dimensional growth. In our case, calcium was supplied in the process of radiolysis of CaF2 film, and silicon was supplied by diffusion from the substrate (under conditions without additional silicon deposition), and the situation is similar to that of growth in Vogg conditions with a large calcium flux, i.e., a three-dimensional growth mode was realized. If we deposited additional silicon, we would change the ratio of calcium and silicon, in fact reducing the effective calcium flux and changing the growth mode into a two-dimensional one, which was observed in our experiments.
The Raman measurements of samples in the irradiated regions gave spectra with three typical peaks of CaSi2 layers (Figure 4) obtained via electron irradiation during CaF2 MBE (CaSi2 polymorph 3R) [15]. In addition, the longer the exposure time was, the higher the intensity of the peaks was. Earlier, we observed such spectra on CaSi2 films synthesized under electron irradiation, but without an additional peak at 430 cm−1. Since the appearance of this peak correlates with a presence of boundaries between CaSi2 regions and residual inclusions CaF2, we attribute it to scattering at the boundaries of CaSi2 formations.
Figure 5 demonstrates temperature dependence of conductance for three films grown under the same growth conditions, but with different time of post-growth irradiation. The increase im irradiation time from 10 to 60 min led to an increase in film conductivity that corresponded to the increase in lateral island size and their overlapping observed in the SEM study (Figure 1). Magnetoresistance (MR) data for these films are shown in the inset of Figure 5. Non-monotonic MR behavior with a transition from negative to positive MR was observed for all samples, with the larger contribution of positive MR for the longer irradiation time. A negative MR is usually associated with the suppression of weak localization that is typical of disordered electronic systems with low mobility. A positive MR is the result of the Lorentz deflection of the carriers [22] and also depends on carrier mobility: (B)/R(B = 0) ~ 1 + (µB)2 (Kohler’s rule [23]). This allows for estimating mobility μ, which was 158 cm2/Vs for Sample 1, 230 cm2/Vs for Sample 2, and 330 cm2/Vs for Sample 3. These results support the structural data and indicate that the increase in irradiation time rendered the samples more metallic.

4. Conclusions

A study of the structural properties of the grown samples confirmed that the developed approach could solve the problem of high surface roughness. The use of the solid-phase epitaxy method at the initial growth stage enabled the formation of a thin Ca-enriched layer under electron irradiation. By supplying additional Si to this surface, one can form CaSi2 two-dimensional islands parallel to the (111) surface of the substrate. Post-growth electron irradiation led to an increase in the number and size of islands. An increase in irradiation dose resulted in overlapping islands and a tendency to form a continuous film. However, if the exposure time was too long, the surface relief changed, and the film became less planar due to the appearance of three-dimensional ripples. The best planarity (lowest surface roughness) was obtained after 20 min post-growth irradiation. The conductivity for the synthesized CaSi2 films increased by increasing the time of post-growth electron irradiation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.Z., V.A.Z. and A.V.D.; investigation, A.F.Z., V.A.Z., N.P.S., V.A.V., G.N.K. and A.V.K.; methodology, A.V.K.; supervision, A.V.D.; visualization, A.F.Z. and N.P.S.; writing—original draft, A.F.Z., V.A.Z. and N.P.S.; writing—review and editing, A.V.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work is funded by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no. 19-12-00070-П).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank NSU Multiple-Access Center VTAN and ISP SB RAS Multiple-access Center Nanostructures for the provision of the measurement equipment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Morar, J.F.; Wittmer, M. Growth of epitaxial CaSi2 films on Si(111). J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1988, 6, 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Galkin, N.G.; Galkin, K.N.; Dotsenko, S.A.; Goroshko, D.L.; Fogarassy, Z.; Pecz, B. The growth processes and crystal structure of Ca silicides films grown by MBE at 500 °C on a Si(001) substrate. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 253, 123380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Galkin, N.G.; Galkin, K.N.; Tupkalo, A.V.; Chusovitin, E.A.; Goroshko, D.L.; Fogarassi, Z.; Pecz, B. Semitransparent and conductive CaSi2 films for silicon device applications. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 59, SFFA12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Galkin, N.G.; Galkin, K.N.; Tupkalo, A.V.; Fogarassy, Z.; Pecz, B. A low temperature growth of Ca silicides on Si(100) and Si(111) substrates: Formation, structure, optical properties and energy band structure parameters. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 813, 152101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Affronte, M.; Laborde, O.; Olcese, G.L.; Palenzona, A. Low temperature properties of calcium mono-and disilicides. J. Alloys Compd. 1998, 274, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Galkin, N.G.; Galkin, K.N.; Tupkalo, A.V.; Dotsenko, S.A.; Fogarassi, Z.; Pecz, B. Ca Silicide Films on Si(100) and Si(111) Substrates: Structure, Optical and Electrical Properties. Int. J. Nanosci. 2019, 18, 1940014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ohsuna, T.; Ito, K.; Nakano, H. Transformation of CaSi overgrowth domains to the CaSi2 crystal phase via vacuum annealing. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 61, 025506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Terada, T.; Ishibe, T.; Katayama, T.; Sato, K.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Nakano, H.; Nakamura, Y. Thermoelectric power factor enhancement of calcium-intercalated layered silicene by introducing metastable phase. Appl. Phys. Express 2021, 14, 115505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kacyuba, A.; Dvurechenskii, A.; Kamaev, G.; Volodin, V.; Krupin, A. Crystal structure of thin CaSi2 films grown by radiation induced epitaxy. J. Crystal Growth 2021, 562, 126080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Terada, T.; Uematsu, Y.; Ishibe, T.; Naruse, N.; Sato, K.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Kobayashi, E.; Nakano, H.; Nakamura, Y. Giant Enhancement of Seebeck Coefficient by Deformation of Silicene Buckled Structure in Calcium-Intercalated Layered Silicene Film. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 9, 2101752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ito, K.; Suemasu, T.; Nakano, H. Growth of tr6-CaSi2 thin films on Si(111) substrates. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 57, 120313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ito, K.; Ohsuna, T.; Suemasu, T.; Nakano, H. Growth and fluorination of CaSi2 thin film. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 59, SFFC02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Würz, R.; Schmidt, R.; Schöpke, A.; Fuhs, W. Solid-phase epitaxy of CaSi2 on Si(111) and the Schottky-barrier height of CaSi2/Si(111). Appl. Surf. Sci. 2002, 190, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kacyuba, A.; Dvurechenskii, A.; Kamaev, G.; Volodin, V.; Krupin, A. Radiation-Induced epitaxial CaSi2 film growth at the molecular-beam epitaxy of CaF2 on Si. Mater. Lett. 2020, 268, 127554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dvurechenskii, A.V.; Kacyuba, A.V.; Kamaev, G.N.; Volodin, V.A.; Smagina, Z.V. Radiation-Induced Nucleation and Growth of CaSi2 Crystals, Both Directly during the Epitaxial CaF2 Growth and after the CaF2 Film Formation. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Charles, L.S.; Moddeman, W.E.; Grant, J.T. Electron-beam-induced decomposition of ion bombarded calcium fluoride surfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1981, 52, 6921. [Google Scholar]
  17. Braungart, R.; Sigmund, H. Formation of magnesium silicide (Mg2Si) and calcium silicide (CaSi2) layers on single-crystal silicon substrates. Z. Naturforsch. 1980, 35a, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zinovyev, V.A.; Kacyuba, A.V.; Volodin, V.A.; Zinovieva, A.F.; Cherkova, S.G.; Smagina, Z.V.; Dvurechenskii, A.V.; Krupin, A.Y.; Borodavchenko, O.M.; Zhivulko, V.D.; et al. Atomic Structure and Optical Properties of CaSi2 Layers Grown on CaF2/Si Substrates. Semiconductors 2021, 55, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Morar, J.F.; Wittmer, M. Metallic CaSi2 epitaxial films on Si(111). Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zinovieva, A.F.; Zinovyev, V.A.; Stepina, N.P.; Volodin, V.A.; Krupin, A.Y.; Kacyuba, A.V.; Dvurechenskii, A.V. Radiation-Stimulated Formation of Two-Dimensional Structures Based on Calcium Silicide. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Vogg, G.; Zamanzadeh-Hanebuth, N.; Brandt, M.; Stutzmann, M.; Albrecht, M. Preparation and Characterization of Epitaxial CaSi2 and Siloxene Layers on Silicon. Chem. Mon. 1999, 130, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ziman, J.M. Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  23. Olsen, J.L. Electron Transport in Metals; Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1962. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (top) RHEED images of the surface of a 2 nm thick CaF2 film deposited at room temperature. (a) As-grown 2 nm thick CaF2 film; (b) after annealing at 700 °C. (bottom) RHEED images of multilayer structure with additional 2 nm thick Si cap layer (c) just after growth and (d) after 60 min post-growth electron irradiation.
Figure 1. (top) RHEED images of the surface of a 2 nm thick CaF2 film deposited at room temperature. (a) As-grown 2 nm thick CaF2 film; (b) after annealing at 700 °C. (bottom) RHEED images of multilayer structure with additional 2 nm thick Si cap layer (c) just after growth and (d) after 60 min post-growth electron irradiation.
Materproc 14 00068 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of surface of (a) as-grown CaF2 film, (b) after 10 min post-growth electron irradiation, (c) after 20 min post-growth electron irradiation, (d) after 60 min post-growth electron irradiation.
Figure 2. SEM images of surface of (a) as-grown CaF2 film, (b) after 10 min post-growth electron irradiation, (c) after 20 min post-growth electron irradiation, (d) after 60 min post-growth electron irradiation.
Materproc 14 00068 g002
Figure 3. AFM images of the film synthesized with (a) post-growth electron irradiation during 20 min and (b) with 60 min post-growth electron irradiation. Height parameters in selected areas (white squares 1 µm × 1 µm): root mean square height Sq ≈ 1.07 nm for (a) and Sq ≈ 7.7 nm for (b); surface skewness Ssk ≈ −0.007 for (a) and Ssk ≈ 0.51 for (b); coefficient of kurtosis Sku ≈ −0.42 for (a) and Sku ≈ 0.17 for (b); arithmetic mean height Sa ≈ 0.87 nm for (a) and Sa ≈ 6.1 nm for (b). If one consider the whole area of the images, the parameters are as follows: Sq ≈ 2.1 nm for (a) and Sq ≈ 17.8 nm for (b); Ssk ≈ 0.27 for (a) and Ssk ≈ −1.67 for (b); Sku ≈ 5.21 for (a) and Sku ≈ 6.5 for (b); Sa ≈ 1.4 nm for (a) and Sa ≈ 11.7 nm for (b).
Figure 3. AFM images of the film synthesized with (a) post-growth electron irradiation during 20 min and (b) with 60 min post-growth electron irradiation. Height parameters in selected areas (white squares 1 µm × 1 µm): root mean square height Sq ≈ 1.07 nm for (a) and Sq ≈ 7.7 nm for (b); surface skewness Ssk ≈ −0.007 for (a) and Ssk ≈ 0.51 for (b); coefficient of kurtosis Sku ≈ −0.42 for (a) and Sku ≈ 0.17 for (b); arithmetic mean height Sa ≈ 0.87 nm for (a) and Sa ≈ 6.1 nm for (b). If one consider the whole area of the images, the parameters are as follows: Sq ≈ 2.1 nm for (a) and Sq ≈ 17.8 nm for (b); Ssk ≈ 0.27 for (a) and Ssk ≈ −1.67 for (b); Sku ≈ 5.21 for (a) and Sku ≈ 6.5 for (b); Sa ≈ 1.4 nm for (a) and Sa ≈ 11.7 nm for (b).
Materproc 14 00068 g003
Figure 4. Raman spectra of films synthesized with different processing types. (2) Post−growth electron irradiation during 20 min; (3) post-growth electron irradiation during 10 min; (4) post-growth electron irradiation during 60 min. Spectrum (1) was obtained on a Si(111) substrate.
Figure 4. Raman spectra of films synthesized with different processing types. (2) Post−growth electron irradiation during 20 min; (3) post-growth electron irradiation during 10 min; (4) post-growth electron irradiation during 60 min. Spectrum (1) was obtained on a Si(111) substrate.
Materproc 14 00068 g004
Figure 5. Temperature dependence of conductivity G for three films synthesized with different post-growth irradiation times (1-10 min, 2-20 min, and 3-60 min). Inset demonstrates the magnetoresistance of these films.
Figure 5. Temperature dependence of conductivity G for three films synthesized with different post-growth irradiation times (1-10 min, 2-20 min, and 3-60 min). Inset demonstrates the magnetoresistance of these films.
Materproc 14 00068 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dvurechenskii, A.V.; Kacyuba, A.V.; Kamaev, G.N.; Volodin, V.A.; Stepina, N.P.; Zinovieva, A.F.; Zinovyev, V.A. Electron-Beam Radiation Effects in Multilayer Structures Grown with the Periodical Deposition of Si and CaF2 on Si(111). Mater. Proc. 2023, 14, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2023-14481

AMA Style

Dvurechenskii AV, Kacyuba AV, Kamaev GN, Volodin VA, Stepina NP, Zinovieva AF, Zinovyev VA. Electron-Beam Radiation Effects in Multilayer Structures Grown with the Periodical Deposition of Si and CaF2 on Si(111). Materials Proceedings. 2023; 14(1):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2023-14481

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dvurechenskii, Anatoly V., Aleksey V. Kacyuba, Gennady N. Kamaev, Vladimir A. Volodin, Natalia P. Stepina, Aigul F. Zinovieva, and Vladimir A. Zinovyev. 2023. "Electron-Beam Radiation Effects in Multilayer Structures Grown with the Periodical Deposition of Si and CaF2 on Si(111)" Materials Proceedings 14, no. 1: 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2023-14481

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop