Next Article in Journal
Effect of Cryogenic Treatment on the Phase Transformation Temperatures and Latent Heat of Ni54Ti46 Shape Memory Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Conference Report: YUCOMAT 2022 & XII World Round Table Conference on Sintering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Carbon Nitride-Based Catalysts for High Pressure CO2 Photoreduction †

1
Chemical Plants and Industrial Chemistry Group, Dipartimento Chimica, Università degli Studi di Milano, CNR-SCITEC and INSTM Unit Milano-Università, Via C. Golgi 19, 20133 Milan, Italy
2
Dipartimento Ingegneria Chimica, Civile ed Ambientale, Università degli Studi di Genova and INSTM Unit Genova, Via all’Opera Pia 15A, 16145 Genoa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at ANM 2022, Aveiro, Portugal, 27–29 July 2022.
Mater. Proc. 2022, 11(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022011001
Published: 5 December 2022

Abstract

:
In this work we focus on carbon nitride materials to improve the conversion and productivity of the photoreduction of CO2, developing a coupled strategy to optimize materials and operating conditions. The metal-free polymeric catalyst, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), is a relatively novel material, characterized by a wide absorbance in the visible region and demonstrating a superior performance compared to the commercial titania P25 benchmark, the most used photocatalyst for this application. We used an innovative photoreactor operating at high pressures of up to 20 bar, which is unprecedented in photocatalytic applications where transparent windows are needed. This enabled a boost in the solubility of CO2 in water when operating the reactor as a tri-phase liquid/gas/solid device and improved the surface adsorption over the catalyst. The best productivity for HCOOH so far achieved with these catalysts at 8 bar, pH = 14 and by using Na2SO3 as a hole scavenger was ca. 370 g/h kgcat. Such productivity is several orders of magnitude higher than the literature values.

1. Introduction

Renewable energy use is a fundamental tool to reduce the emission of CO2, mitigate climate change and provide a clean environment, as well as clean energy, for the population. Despite intermittency and fluctuations in intensity, the sun is a source of practically infinite energy, which is available for free, equally distributed on Earth and free of CO2 emissions. Natural photosynthesis is a process that converts atmospheric CO2 into sugar-based biomass. It is viewed as model to try to store solar energy in chemical form [1]. It is possible to exploit solar light through the production of solar fuels using photocatalysis. Heterogeneous photosynthetic processes use solid semiconductors activated through the absorption of a photon with an energy larger than the band gap [2]. Upon light absorption, an electron-hole couple is formed, and the two separated charges can be used to promote reduction or oxidation reactions with redox couples present in the reaction environment. Through this principle, solar light can be used to achieve the reduction of water to H2, or of CO2 to various solar fuels. The main challenges are related to the limited lifetime of the photo-promoted charges that recombine through faster processes than the reactions of interest. Furthermore, wide band gap materials are unable to harvest solar light.
In this paper, we consider the photoreduction of CO2 conducted in an innovative photoreactor able to operate at up to 20 bar of pressure to favor CO2 absorption in an aqueous medium and its surface adsorption on the semiconductor catalyst. The operation at high pressure allows the exploration of an unconventionally high temperature of reaction (80–120 °C) to increase the reactivity. CO2 can be converted consecutively to HCOOH, HCHO, CH3OH and CH4 with increasing difficulty due to the simultaneous need for progressively more and more electrons. In preliminary studies, we have concluded that the reaction is favored at pH = 14 (starting from the carbonate ion) which leads to the highest overall productivity and energy stored in the form of HCOOH [3,4,5]. Finally, CO2 is reduced by a photo-promoted electron, and to complete the cycle, the holes must be filled due to the action of an electron donor. Water oxidation is too slow and to improve the activity we selected Na2SO3 as hole scavenger.
Titanium dioxide is a widely employed material for this application [6,7], with favorable qualities of high abundance, low-cost [8], resistance to photo-corrosion in water [9] and recyclability [10]. However, it is characterized by a relatively large band gap and a high recombination rate of the promoted photocharges, which limits the efficiency of the process. The metal-free polymeric catalyst, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), is a relatively novel catalyst compared to TiO2. g-C3N4 is characterized by a graphitic 2D-type structure and a narrow band gap (on average 2.7 eV), so in principle it is suitable for activation by visible light. g-C3N4 has been prepared here via direct thermal condensation of an organic precursor containing carbon and nitrogen, i.e., melamine. Tuning of the surface area was accomplished by exfoliation with an ultrasound probe operating at variable power.

2. Experimental

Bulk graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) was prepared by thermal condensation of melamine, which was placed in a covered ceramic crucible and heated at 2 °C min−1 up to 550–600 °C. The resulting yellow powder underwent successive treatment at different ultrasound, US, intensities, in order to obtain an exfoliated material with an increased specific surface area.
All the tests for the photoreduction of CO2 were performed using an innovative pressurized batch photo-reactor, designed to work under pressures of up to 20 bar and temperatures no higher than 90 °C. Irradiation was accomplished by means of a 125 W medium pressure Hg vapour lamp made of two bulbs which emit in the range of 254–364 nm (average irradiance 153 W/m2). The optimal catalyst and hole scavenger (Na2SO3) concentrations were 31 mg·L−1 for the photocatalyst and 1.67 g·L−1 for the HS. Each test lasted for 24 h. The products in liquid-phase were analyzed via HPLC (LC-4000 series, Jasco, Easton, MD, USA) and the gas-phase products by GC (Agilent 7890, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

The prepared g-C3N4 catalysts were analyzed by XRD and the results are reported in Figure 1. The samples were only partially crystalline and showed two main reflections at 2θ = 13° and 2θ = 27.4°, which were related to interplane packing of linear heptazines chains and interlayer staking of aromatic rings, respectively, in a way similar to graphite [11,12]. It is worth highlighting that there was a shift toward higher diffraction angles of the main peak with respect to the theoretical value reported in the JCPDS card. This shift is linked to the interplane distance and, in the case of the sample prepared at 550 °C, it is partially visible from the diffractogram that the exfoliation process led to a delamination of the staked sheets, though we are still far from a complete detachment [11]. C3N4-600 was more crystalline but had also a more compact structure according to the shift of the main peak.
The bulk material was progressively exfoliated by using an ultrasound (US) probe at variable power of 30 to 120 W. Increasing US power led to an increase in surface area and to a decrease in crystallinity of the material, as visible by the flattening and broadening of the XRD reflections. Similar conclusions were drawn when the melamine condensation was carried out at 600 °C. Both bulk C3N4 samples obtained at 550 °C and 600 °C showed low surface area, 9 and 6 m2/g, respectively, which increased to 28 and 20 m2/g when 120 W US power was applied.
The samples showed a band gap within the range 2.7–2.9 eV, as determined by diffuse reflectance UV-Vis Spectroscopy. With such a band gap the material was responsive to visible light.
The photocatalytic activity for the photoreduction of CO2 returned the following results (Figure 2) compared with commercial titania P25 nanopowder. The productivity of formic acid ranged between 4 and 8 mol/h kgcat for every sample, which is a very high value when compared with the literature. g-C3N4 overperformed the commercial titania catalyst, increasing the productivity of HCOOH by at least by 30% even in the case of the bulk material, irrespective of the calcination temperature. The exfoliation procedure was effective not only in increasing the surface area, but most of all the productivity, which indeed doubled when applying the highest US power (120 W).
H2 productivity was in general lower than for P25, but again increased with the US power, while very small amounts of CO were observed. The gas-phase products are formed due to consecutive photo-reforming of formic acid which acts itself as a hole scavenger when the sulfite is fully consumed.

4. Conclusions

A high pressure photoreactor was used for CO2 photoreduction aimed at maximizing the productivity of formic acid and to develop stable materials for solar light harvesting. Graphitic carbon nitride was prepared by thermal condensation of melamine. Due to the low surface area achieved through this synthesis route, exfoliation was accomplished by US at variable power (30–120 W). Delamination was proven by XRD, and an increase in surface area from <10 to ca. 30 m2/g was indeed demonstrated. The prepared materials were more active than commercial P25, achieving 8 mol/h kgcat (i.e., ca. 370 g/h kgcat) of HCOOH at 8 bar and 80 °C, which is one of the highest productivities reported in the literature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.R. and G.R.; methodology, F.C.; formal analysis, F.C.; investigation, M.T.; resources, I.R. and G.R.; data curation, M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, I.R.; writing—review and editing, G.R.; supervision, I.R.; project administration, I.R.; funding acquisition, I.R. and G.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fondazione Cariplo (Italy), grant number 2021-0855-“SCORE - Solar Energy for Circular CO2 Photoconversion and Chemicals Re-generation” within the Circular Economy call 2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are reported here.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Green, M.A.; Emery, K. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 3). Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 1994, 2, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xie, S.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, G.; Wang, Y. Photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic reduction of CO2 using heterogeneous catalysts with controlled nanostructures. Chem. Commun. 2015, 52, 35–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bahadori, E.; Tripodi, A.; Villa, A.; Pirola, C.; Prati, L.; Ramis, G.; Dimitratos, N.; Wang, D.; Rossetti, I. High pressure CO2 photoreduction using Au/TiO2: Unravelling the effect of co-catalysts and of titania polymorphs. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 2253–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bahadori, E.; Tripodi, A.; Villa, A.; Pirola, C.; Prati, L.; Ramis, G.; Rossetti, I. High pressure photoreduction of CO2: Effect of catalyst formulation, hole scavenger addition and operating conditions. Catalysts 2018, 8, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Galli, F.; Compagnoni, M.; Vitali, D.; Pirola, C.; Bianchi, C.L.; Villa, A.; Prati, L.; Rossetti, I. CO2 photoreduction at high pressure to both gas and liquid products over titanium dioxide. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 200, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fujishima, A.; Rao, T.N.; Tryk, D.A. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2000, 1, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, J.; Zhou, P.; Liu, J.; Yu, J. New understanding of the difference of photocatalytic activity among anatase, rutile and brookite TiO2. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 20382–20386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Donald, V.B. Titanium Dioxide: Commodity Or Speciality? Pigment Resin Technol. 1994, 23, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Izumi, Y. Recent Advances (2012–2015) in the photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels using solar energy: Feseability for a new energy. In Advances in CO2 Capture, Sequestration and Conversion; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2015; p. 46. [Google Scholar]
  10. König, B. Chemical Photocatalysis; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2020; ISBN 9783110576764. [Google Scholar]
  11. Alwin, E.; Kočí, K.; Wojcieszak, R.; Zieliński, M.; Edelmannová, M.; Pietrowski, M. Influence of high temperature synthesis on the structure of graphitic carbon nitride and its hydrogen generation ability. Materials 2020, 13, 2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, X.; Maeda, K.; Thomas, A.; Takanabe, K.; Xin, G.; Carlsson, J.M.; Domen, K.; Antonietti, M. A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the g-C3N4 materials prepared from melamine, calcined at 550 °C and exfoliated with variable US power (up to 120 W).
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the g-C3N4 materials prepared from melamine, calcined at 550 °C and exfoliated with variable US power (up to 120 W).
Materproc 11 00001 g001
Figure 2. Productivity of HCOOH, CO and H2 obtained with the prepared catalysts. Conditions: pH = 14, 31 mg/L photocatalyst, 1.67 g/L Na2SO3, 24 h reaction time, 80 °C, 8 bar.
Figure 2. Productivity of HCOOH, CO and H2 obtained with the prepared catalysts. Conditions: pH = 14, 31 mg/L photocatalyst, 1.67 g/L Na2SO3, 24 h reaction time, 80 °C, 8 bar.
Materproc 11 00001 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tommasi, M.; Conte, F.; Rossetti, I.; Ramis, G. Carbon Nitride-Based Catalysts for High Pressure CO2 Photoreduction. Mater. Proc. 2022, 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022011001

AMA Style

Tommasi M, Conte F, Rossetti I, Ramis G. Carbon Nitride-Based Catalysts for High Pressure CO2 Photoreduction. Materials Proceedings. 2022; 11(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022011001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tommasi, Matteo, Francesco Conte, Ilenia Rossetti, and Gianguido Ramis. 2022. "Carbon Nitride-Based Catalysts for High Pressure CO2 Photoreduction" Materials Proceedings 11, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022011001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop