Next Article in Journal
Edge Computing in Context Awareness: A Comprehensive Study
Previous Article in Journal
Neuroscience Empowering Society: BCI Insights and Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Domination Number in the Context of Some New Graphs †

1
Department of Mathematics, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201306, India
2
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Jain (Deemed-to-be) University, Bengaluru 560069, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd Computing Congress 2023, Chennai, India, 28–29 December 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 62(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024062014
Published: 18 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd Computing Congress 2023)

Abstract

:
Let G = (V, E) be a graph, where D is a subset of V, such that the set of vertices in the set (V-D) is adjacent to at least one vertex in set D. Then, set D is known as the domination set. In other words, a dominating set in graph G is a set of vertices S, such that every vertex in the graph either belongs to S or is adjacent to at least one vertex in S. In this paper, we investigate the domination number for some different types of graphs like antiprism graph An, alternate pentagonal snake A(PSn), cycle with one chord, and m-copies of cycle Cn with one chord. The domination number is frequently employed in computer science for tasks such as to optimize network design, algorithm design, security analysis, etc. Complex computational and network related challenges can be solved by domination number.

1. Introduction

In this study, we have considered finite and undirected graphs with no loop and multiple edges. A graph G(V, E) is composed of vertices (or nodes) and edges. The vertices are elements of non-empty set V, and the edges are unordered pairs of distinct vertices from V, forming set E. Each vertex has a degree, which represents the count of edges connected to that vertex, with loops (edges connecting a vertex to itself) counted twice. The open neighborhood of a vertex v, denoted as N(v), consists of all the vertices adjacent to v, i.e., connected to v by an edge. The closed neighborhood of v, denoted as N[v], includes both v and its open neighborhood. The domination number of a graph G is defined as the minimum cardinality (i.e., the smallest size) of a dominating set in G. It represents the minimum number of vertices needed to ensure that each vertex within the graph must either belong to the dominating set or be connected to a vertex within the dominating set. Domination in graphs is also discussed by Ambily et al. [1]. The notion of dominating sets within the field of graph theory can be traced back to the game of chess, where the objective is to strategically position chess pieces to dominate specific squares on the chessboard. The quest for calculating the domination numbers of graphs dates back to 1862 when De Jaenisch embarked on a quest to ascertain the smallest number of queens required on a chessboard. The goal was to ensure that every square was either occupied by a queen or within the reach of a queen’s single move. The concept of domination goes beyond the game of chess and has wide-ranging applications in different domains. In the field of chemistry, domination theory serves as a valuable tool for analyzing chemical structures. Moreover, domination theory finds practical uses in areas such as wireless communication networks, business networks, radio stations, and decision-making processes, as discussed by Gupta [2]. These practical applications highlight the importance and versatility of domination theory beyond its original association with chess, establishing it as a valuable concept for various fields of study and problem-solving. Jayachandran et al. [3] have discussed the domination number of graphs like fan Fm,2, diamond snake Dn, banana tree B(m, n), coconut tree CT (m, n) and firecracker F(m, n). Vaidya et al. [4] have given us the idea of the strong domination number of various graphs. Abdul et al. [5] have shown an Independent Domination Number by using 6-Alternative Snake graphs. Independent Domination Number by using a triangular and quadrilateral snake graph has been discussed by Meenakshi et al. [6]. Recently signed product cordial labeling has been studied on pan graphs by Sadawarte [7] and on some square cycle graphs by Sadawarte [8]. Bhuvaneswari et al. [9] have discussed domination integrity of snake and sunlet graphs. Wheel graphs and its locating edge domination number has been explained by Adawiyah et al. [10]. Similarly, we can extend this study by considering different types of graphs like antiprism graph An, alternate pentagonal snake A(PSn), cycle with one chord and m-copies of cycle Cn with one chord. The concept of domination number has various applications in computer science. This concept is used in network design, wireless communication, social network analysis, security etc. Calculating the domination number is valuable for crafting effective network configurations, like for sensor networks and communication networks, where ensuring network connectivity or coverage with the fewest possible nodes to be managed or monitored is essential. In social network analysis, the dominating sets can uncover important individuals or nodes within a network, contributing to strategies like viral marketing and efforts to maximize influence.

2. Definitions

Definition 1. 
Within a graph G = (V, E), a set of vertices, denoted as D, is termed a dominating set if every vertex not included in D (belonging to V-D) is connected to at least one vertex within D. The graph’s domination number, denoted as γ(G), signifies the minimum size of a dominating set necessary to encompass all the vertices in G.
Definition 2. 
An antiprism graph An is a polyhedral and planar graph that represents the skeleton of an antiprism. The number of vertices and edges in an n-antiprism graph is 2n and 4n, respectively. It is isomorphic to the circulant graph.
Definition 3. 
The alternate pentagonal snake A(PSn) is constructed by transforming a path p1, p2, …, pk. This transformation involves adding two new vertices ui and wi between each pair of consecutive vertices pi and p(i+1). Additionally, a new vertex xi is connected to the vertices ui and wi. In this way, every alternate edge of the original path is replaced by a cycle C5.
Definition 4. 
A chord of a cycle Cn is an edge that connects two vertices of the cycle Cn, where the two vertices are not adjacent to each other.
Definition 5. 
Cycle with one chord can be defined as a cycle with a chord, such that there exist two vertices that are adjacent to each other, but not consecutive along the cycle.
Definition 6. 
The floor function, denoted asx, is a mathematical function that returns the largest integer less than or equal to a given real number x. It is commonly referred to as the greatest integer function or integer value. If we have a real number x such that n ≤ x < n + 1, where n is an integer, then the floor of xxis equal to n.
Definition 7. 
The ceiling function, also known as the least integer function, is defined as the mathematical operation that finds the smallest integer greater than or equal to a given real number x. It is denoted byxor x. If we have a real number x such that n − 1 < x ≤ n, where n is an integer, then the ceiling of xxis equal to n.

3. Main Results

Theorem 1. 
For any antiprism graph, An n ≥ 5 domination number always exists.
Proof. 
Let G be a graph which is an antiprism graph An with 2n—vertices and 4n—edges. The following explanation delineates the minimal dominating set and its cardinality, referred to as the domination number, i.e., γ(G):
  • Condition I: n ≡ 0 mod5, γ(G) = 0.4n is the domination number.
  • Condition II: n ≡ 1 mod5, γ(G) = ⌈0.4n + 0.6⌉ is the domination number.
  • Condition III: n ≡ 2 mod5, γ(G) = ⌊0.4n + 0.5⌋ is the domination number.
  • Condition IV: n ≡ 3 mod5, γ(G) = 0.4n + 0.8 is the domination number.
  • Condition V: n ≡ 4 mod5, γ(G) = ⌊0.4n + 0.8⌋ is the domination number. □
Example:
(1)
The domination number of an antiprism graph A7 is 3, as shown in Figure 1.
In the above Figure 1 the set of red vertices form the dominating set.
(2)
The domination number of an antiprism graph A10 is 4, as shown in Figure 2.
In the above Figure 2 the set of red vertices form the dominating set.
Theorem 2. 
For any alternate pentagonal snake A(PSn), the domination number exists ∀ n ≥ 3.
Proof. 
Let G be an alternate pentagonal snake graph with 5n vertices and 5n + (n−1) edges. The following explanation delineates the minimal dominating set and its cardinality, referred to as the domination number, i.e., γ(G):
  • Condition I: n ≡ 0 mod3, γ(G) = ⌊ 5 n 3 ⌋ is the domination number.
  • Condition II: n ≡ 1 mod3, γ(G) = 5 n 3 + 1 3 is the domination number.
  • Condition III: n ≡ 2 mod3, γ(G) = 5 n 3 + 2 3 is the domination number. □
Example:
(1)
The domination number of an alternate pentagonal snake graph A(PS3) is 5, as shown in Figure 3.
In the above Figure 3 the set of red vertices form the dominating set.
(2)
The domination number of an alternate pentagonal snake graph A(PS4) is 7, as shown in Figure 4.
In the above Figure 4 the set of red vertices form the dominating set.
Theorem 3. 
Domination number exists for cycle Cn with one chord ∀ n ≥ 4.
Proof. 
Let G be a cyclic graph Cn with one chord having n vertices and n + 1 edges. The following explanation delineates the minimal dominating set and its cardinality, referred to as the domination number, i.e., γ(G):
  • Condition I: n ≡ 0 mod3, γ(G) = 1 n 3 is the domination number.
  • Condition II: n ≡ 1 mod3, γ(G) = 1 n 3 1 3 is the domination number.
  • Condition III: n ≡ 2 mod3, γ(G) = 1 n 3 + 1 3 is the domination number. □
Example:
(1)
The domination number of a cycle C8 with one chord is 3, as shown in Figure 5.
In the above Figure 5 the set of red vertices form the dominating set.
(2)
The domination number of a cycle C13 with one chord is 4, as shown in Figure 6.
In the above Figure 6 the set of red vertices form the dominating set.
Theorem 4. 
Domination number exists for m-copies of cycle Cn with one chord ∀ n ≥ 4 and m ∊ N.
Proof. 
Let G be a cyclic graph Cn with one chord having m-copies with mn vertices and m(n + 1) + (m−1) edges. The following explanation delineates the minimal dominating set and its cardinality, referred to as the domination number, i.e., γ(G):
  • Condition I: n ≡ 0 mod3, γ(G) = 1 n 3 m is the domination number.
  • Condition II: n ≡ 1 mod3, γ(G) = ( 1 n 3 1 3 )m is the domination number.
  • Condition III: n ≡ 2 mod3, γ(G) = ( 1 n 3 + 1 3 )m is the domination number. □
Example:
(1)
The domination number of 4-copies of cycle C5 with one chord is 8, as shown in Figure 7.
In the above Figure 7 the set of red vertices form the dominating set.
(2)
The domination number of 3-copies of cycle C6 with one chord is 6, as shown in Figure 8.
In the above Figure 8 the set of red vertices form the dominating set.

4. Concluding Remarks

We have proved the existence of domination number for graphs like antiprism graph An, alternate pentagonal snake A(PSn), cycle with one chord and m-copies of cycle Cn with one chord. This versatile approach not only facilitates graph duplication, merging, and reconstruction but also opens up avenues for advanced graph operations in the future. Researchers are actively exploring ways to improve result comparability across diverse graphs, making it an area of ongoing investigation and potential breakthroughs.

Author Contributions

Identify the problem, investigation, writing and methodology, S.L.; Supervision, conceptualization, review and editing, S.S.; Supervision, writing, review and editing, S.G.; Methodology, G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We want to convey our sincere thanks to all the individuals who played a vital role in bringing this research paper to fulfillment. Your constant support and priceless input have significantly influenced the results of this study. We are truly grateful for the time, effort, and expertise each of us have generously shared, which has not only enriched the content but also enhanced the overall quality of this paper. Your contributions have made a significant impact, and we sincerely appreciate your dedication and collaboration throughout this research journey.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ambily, S.; Sebastian, B.; Varghese, L.A. Domination in Graphs. Int. J. Mod. Trends Eng. Res. (IJMTER) 2016, 3, 135–141. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gupta, P. Domination in Graph with Application. Paripex Indian J. Res. 2013, 2, 115–117. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jayachandran, E.; Sugumaran, A. Domination number of some graphs. Int. J. Sci. Dev. Res. 2018, 3, 386–391. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vaidya, S.K.; Karkar, S.H. On Strong Domination Number of Graphs. Appl. Appl. Math. Int. J. (AAM) 2017, 12, 604–612. [Google Scholar]
  5. Abdul, R.; Meenakshi, S.; Tamiloli, P. Independent Domination Number for 6- Alternative Snake graphs. J. Algebr. Stat. 2022, 13, 1887–1890. [Google Scholar]
  6. Meenakshi, S.; Senthurpriya, N. Independent Domination Number in Triangular and Quadrilateral Snake Graph. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. (IJRTE) 2019, 8, 20–23. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sadawarte, S.; Srivastav, S. Signed product cordial labeling of some pan graphs. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 57, 2307–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sadawarte, S.; Srivastav, S. On Signed Product Cordial Labeling of Some Square Cycle Graphs. Des. Eng. 2021, 57, 13228–13233. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhuvaneswari, D.; Meenakshi, S. Domination Integrity of Snake and Sunlet Graphs. Adv. Appl. Math. Sci. 2021, 20, 1811–1821. [Google Scholar]
  10. Adawiyah, R.; Agustin, I.H.; Dafik; Slamin; Albirri, E.R. Related Wheel Graphs and Its Locating Edge Domination Number. J. Phys. 2018, 1022, 012007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Antiprism graph A7.
Figure 1. Antiprism graph A7.
Engproc 62 00014 g001
Figure 2. Antiprism graph A10.
Figure 2. Antiprism graph A10.
Engproc 62 00014 g002
Figure 3. Alternate pentagonal snake graph A(PS3).
Figure 3. Alternate pentagonal snake graph A(PS3).
Engproc 62 00014 g003
Figure 4. Alternate pentagonal snake graph A(PS4).
Figure 4. Alternate pentagonal snake graph A(PS4).
Engproc 62 00014 g004
Figure 5. Cyclic graph C8 with one chord.
Figure 5. Cyclic graph C8 with one chord.
Engproc 62 00014 g005
Figure 6. Cyclic graph C13 with one chord.
Figure 6. Cyclic graph C13 with one chord.
Engproc 62 00014 g006
Figure 7. 4-copies of cycle C5 with one chord.
Figure 7. 4-copies of cycle C5 with one chord.
Engproc 62 00014 g007
Figure 8. 3-copies of cycle C6 with one chord.
Figure 8. 3-copies of cycle C6 with one chord.
Engproc 62 00014 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Leel, S.; Srivastav, S.; Gupta, S.; Ganesan, G. Domination Number in the Context of Some New Graphs. Eng. Proc. 2024, 62, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024062014

AMA Style

Leel S, Srivastav S, Gupta S, Ganesan G. Domination Number in the Context of Some New Graphs. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 62(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024062014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leel, Slashi, Sweta Srivastav, Sangeeta Gupta, and Geetha Ganesan. 2024. "Domination Number in the Context of Some New Graphs" Engineering Proceedings 62, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024062014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop