Statement of Peer Review †
- Type of peer review: single-blind.
- Conference submission management system: Through Email and Google Forms.
- Total number of abstracts received: 252.
- Total number of abstracts shortlisted: 205.
- Number of submissions assigned to Engineering Proceedings: 111.
- Number of submissions sent for review: 62.
- Number of submissions accepted: 48.
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 77%
- Average number of reviews per paper: 2 (First Review) + 1 (Second Review)
- Total number of reviewers involved: 22.
- Peer review criteria and process: Figure 1.
Conflicts of Interest
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Babu, K.; Krishnan, A.V.; Jayakumar, K.; Dhananchezian, M. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2024, 61, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061050
Babu K, Krishnan AV, Jayakumar K, Dhananchezian M. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 61(1):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061050
Chicago/Turabian StyleBabu, K., Anirudh Venkatraman Krishnan, K. Jayakumar, and M. Dhananchezian. 2024. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 61, no. 1: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061050
