Next Article in Journal
Development of Electric Power Generator by Using Hydrogen
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Linear Economic Characteristics of Machines for Optimal Operation of Heat Sources
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Diagnostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer Applying Rayleigh Low-Rank Embedding Thermography †

by
Bardia Yousefi
1,*,
Xavier P. V. Maldague
2,* and
Fatemeh Hassanipour
3
1
Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland at College Park, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
2
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W Campbell Rd, Mailstop ECW-31, Richardson, TX 75080, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 17th International Workshop on Advanced Infrared Technology and Applications, Venice, Italy, 10–13 September 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 51(1), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023051038
Published: 29 November 2023

Abstract

:
Thermography has found extensive application as a supplementary diagnostic tool in breast cancer diagnosis, notably complementing the clinical breast exam (CBE). Within dynamic thermography, matrix factorization methods have demonstrated their utility in accentuating thermal heterogeneities by generating thermal basis vectors. A significant challenge in such approaches is to identify the leading thermal basis vector that effectively captures predominant thermal patterns. Embedding methods are used to fuse multiple projected basis vectors onto a single basis for the extraction of the thermal features, known as thermomics. In this study, we introduce Rayleigh embedding to project thermal basis vectors obtained from factorization techniques into a lower-dimensional space, highlighting thermal patterns. This enhances the reliability of the thermal system, thereby assisting in CBE. The best results of the embedding method combining clinical information and demographics yield 82.9% (66.7%, 86.7%) using a random forest. The results demonstrated promising preliminary outcomes, leading to the early detection of breast abnormalities, and can serve as a non-invasive tool to aid CBE.

1. Introduction

Despite the availability of advanced screening and therapeutic methods, breast cancer continues to be the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and ranks as the second most prevalent cancer [1]. In this study, we propose Rayleigh embedding (a condition of Weibull) for thermographic imaging, which can serve as a valuable aid to clinical breast exams (CBE) preceding mammography. Our hypothesis posits that leveraging low-rank embedding techniques can effectively reduce the dimensionality of thermal sequences while boosting the heterogeneity of thermal patterns leading to better thermal imaging features. This heterogeneity may provide insights into vasodilation and angiogenesis resulting from cancer metabolism [2,3,4,5].
Many studies have corroborated the efficacy of infrared thermography in detecting hypervascularity and hyperthermia associated with non-palpable breast cancer [6,7,8]. Consequently, infrared thermography exhibits promise as a potential biomarker for the early detection of breast cancer; however, it is crucial to emphasize its utilization in conjunction with CBE and mammography rather than as a standalone screening modality.
Computational thermographic techniques, such as principal component analysis (PCA) [9], non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) [10], fixed eigenvector analysis [11,12], sparse factorization [13], t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) [14], candid covariance-free incremental principal component thermography (CCIPCT) [15], sparse PCA [16], semi-NMF [17,18], sparse NMF [19], convex NMF [20,21], deep semiNMF [20], and deep learning convex [20], have been utilized in thermography.
A new embedding is defined, using a condition of the Rayleigh distribution function, Rayleigh. Techniques such as Gaussian [20] and Bell [22] embedding approaches have been introduced previously, and this study demonstrates the application of Rayleigh embedding in factorization analysis for thermography. The study proposes using the most predominant basis combined with embedding to extract thermomics and train a classifier for the early diagnosis of breast abnormality.

2. Method

Input data X are a stack of vectorized thermal images, a heat matrix. A low-rank representation model is shown as follows:
X BA  
where X MN × τ , i.e., X = [ x 1 , x 2 , , x τ ] and can be shown by a linear combination of τ bases (basis vectors), B = { β 1 , β 2 , , β τ } ,   B MN × τ and A , a coefficient matrix, A   τ × τ ,   A = { α 1 , α 2 , , α τ } . x 1 , x 2 , , x τ are vectorized thermal images and correspond to τ frames.   X is a normalized stack of many thermal tensors obtained from input thermal images. Bases and coefficients can be modified depending on which eigen decomposition or matrix factorization method is used.

Embedding

This study proposes a novel approach using Rayleigh distribution that harnesses thermal base embedding to extract the most salient aspects of the thermal sequence, denoted as low-rank representation, to extract more effective thermomics, utilizing different eigen decomposition techniques. This distribution is an example of Weibull distribution (for k = 2 and coefficient matrix   λ = 2 σ ) which exhibits the Rayleigh distribution [23], notably serving as an interpolation between the exponential distribution ( k = 1 ) and Rayleigh distribution.
The use of bases embedding has been proposed in previous studies [20,22], which involves combining multiple decomposed bases to reduce the dimensionality of thermal images. We previously applied low-rank representation methods to transform higher temporal dimensionality into lower temporal representations, which can be considered as bases computed using matrix factorization approaches [19]. We generate a set of low temporal dimensional represented basis vectors ( B = { β 1 , β 2 , , β τ } ,   where B s × τ , s = M N )) and integrate their overall representation using two embedding membership functions [20,22]. This approach allows us to effectively reduce the dimensionality of presenting thermal images while preserving important information.
Definition 1. 
The embedded low-dimensional representation,  Φ ¨ ,  defined as follows:
Φ ¨ = i = 1 p w i    
where  w i  is a function of basis vector  β i  and defines by for element of  β i e 0 :
w i = b k   β i k 1   e b β i k
where the shape parameter  k  is the same as above, while the scale parameter is  b = λ k .
Thermomics extracted from the embedded bases subsequently lead to the automatic detection of breast cancerous leading abnormalities (CLAs) which can be used for a CBE and screening (see Figure 1). The findings of this study validate the reliability of thermomics in the early detection of breast cancer and effectively highlight CLAs in patients.

3. Results

The analysis of thermal patterns in breast cancer screening datasets was conducted with meticulous attention to monitoring vasodilation and the process of blood formation [24]. To achieve an approximation of the data, we employed convex factorization embedding, a powerful technique that extracts meaningful insights. Furthermore, a comparative analysis was performed, contrasting the results obtained from convex factorization embedding with those derived from various low-rank matrix approximation algorithms. The purpose of this particular examination was to unravel the subtle nuances and inherent discrepancies among the different methods employed, thereby fostering a more comprehensive understanding of their relative effectiveness.
This embedding approach was employed to embed low-dimensional (LD) representations of images obtained using low-ranking representation methods. In order to assess the degree of thermal heterogeneity within the breast region, a reference label was affixed between the participants’ breasts, serving as a reference point and facilitating the normalization of the image representations. By applying the embedding technique, the thermal heterogeneity was significantly enhanced, resulting in a distinct differentiation between symptomatic and cancerous patients as compared to healthy participants. The findings, as presented in Table 1, showcase the efficacy of embedding in detecting cancer-related abnormalities.
In this study, a total of 354 thermomics were extracted from the regions of interest (ROI) within the breast areas. These thermomics were obtained by applying spectral embedding to the embedded low-rank generated avatar, effectively reducing the dimensionality to seven features. Subsequently, a random forest model with 10-fold cross-validation was utilized to predict the diagnosis based on these reduced-dimensional thermomics.

4. Conclusions

This study tackled a significant challenge associated with the low-dimensional (LD) representation of thermal sequences, specifically the selection of a prominent representative basis. To address this challenge, the study introduced embedding approaches.
To assess the performance of the proposed approach, a comparative analysis was conducted against state-of-the-art thermographic methods, including PCT, CCIPCT, NMF, Sparse PCT, Convex-NMF, Deep semi-NMF, as well as Bell embedding approaches. The results demonstrated that Rayleigh embedding exhibited notable capability in preserving thermal heterogeneity, enabling effective discrimination between abnormal and healthy participants. Rayleigh embedding achieved the highest accuracy of 82.9% (66.7%, 86.7%) compared to other factorization methods, notably outperforming Deep SemiNMF. Future work can focus on the low-rank approximation and more diverse cohort of patients to ensure the hypothesis of this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.Y., X.P.V.M. and F.H.; methodology, B.Y.; software, B.Y.; validation, B.Y. and F.H.; formal analysis, B.Y.; investigation, B.Y., X.P.V.M. and F.H.; resources, B.Y., X.P.V.M. and F.H.; data curation, B.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, B.Y.; writing—review and editing, B.Y., X.P.V.M. and F.H.; visualization, B.Y.; supervision, X.P.V.M. and F.H.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University System of Maryland’s William E. Kirwan Center for Academic Innovation 2022–2023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (HUAP) of the Federal University Fluminense (under registration number CAAE: 01042812.0.0000.5243 by the Brazilian Ministry of Health).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin. 2021, 71, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lozano, A.; Hayes, J.C.; Compton, L.M.; Azarnoosh, J.; Hassanipour, F. Determining the thermal characteristics of breast cancer based on high-resolution infrared imaging, 3D breast scans, and magnetic resonance imaging. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Figueiredo, A.A.A.; Fernandes, H.C.; Guimaraes, G. Experimental approach for breast cancer center estimation using infrared thermography. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2018, 95, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Figueiredo, A.A.A.; do Nascimento, J.G.; Malheiros, F.C.; da Silva Ignacio, L.H.; Fernandes, H.C.; Guimaraes, G. Breast tumor localization using skin surface temperatures from a 2D anatomic model without knowledge of the thermophysical properties. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2019, 172, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kennedy, D.A.; Lee, T.; Seely, D. A comparative review of thermography as a breast cancer screening technique. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gamagami, P. Indirect signs of breast cancer: Angiogenesis study. In Atlas of Mammography; Blackwell Science: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996; pp. 321–326. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yahara, T.; Koga, T.; Yoshida, S.; Nakagawa, S.; Deguchi, H.; Shirouzu, K. Relationship between microvessel density and thermographic hot areas in breast cancer. Surg. Today 2003, 33, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Lahiri, B.B.; Bagavathiappan, S.; Jayakumar, T.; Philip, J. Medical applications of infrared thermography: A review. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2012, 55, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rajic, N. Principal component thermography for flaw contrast enhancement and flaw depth characterisation in composite structures. Compos. Struct. 2002, 58, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marinetti, S.; Finesso, L.; Marsilio, E. Matrix factorization methods: Application to thermal ndt/e. NDT E Int. 2006, 39, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cramer, K.E.; Winfree, W.P. Fixed eigenvector analysis of thermographic NDE data. In Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Applications XXXIII; Safai, M., Brown, J.R., Eds.; International Society for Optics and Photonics; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2011; Volume 8013, pp. 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ebrahimi, S.; Fleuret, J.R.; Klein, M.; Théroux, L.D.; Ibarra-Castanedo, C.; Maldague, X.P. Data Enhancement via Low-Rank Matrix Reconstruction in Pulsed Thermography for Carbon-Fibre-Reinforced Polymers. Sensors 2021, 21, 7185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ahmed, J.; Gao, B.; Woo, W.L. Wavelet-integrated alternating sparse dictionary matrix decomposition in thermal imaging cfrp defect detection. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 15, 4033–4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Barry, M.; Khansari, M.; Tallon, P.D.; Carino, C.; Hershman, M.; Fernandes, H.C.; Maghsoudi, O.H.; Maldague, X.P.V.; Yousefi, B. Multimodal radiothermomic biomarkers for breast cancer screening. In Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Applications XLIV; SPIE: Orlando, FL, USA, 2022; Volume 12109, pp. 115–126. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yousefi, B.; Sfarra, S.; Castanedo, C.I.; Maldague, X.P. Comparative analysis on thermal non-destructive testing imagery applying Candid Covariance-Free Incremental Principal Component Thermography (CCIPCT). Infrared Phys. Technol. 2017, 85, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yousefi, B.; Sfarra, S.; Sarasini, F.; Castanedo, C.I.; Maldague, X.P. Low-rank sparse principal component thermography (sparse-pct): Comparative assessment on detection of subsurface defects. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2019, 98, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yousefi, B.; Sfarra, S.; Ibarra-Castanedo, C.; Avdelidis, N.P.; Maldague, X.P. Thermography data fusion and nonnegative matrix factorization for the evaluation of cultural heritage objects and buildings. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 136, 943–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yousefi, B.; Ibarra-Castanedo, C.; Maldague, X.P. Infrared nondestructive testing via semi-nonnegative matrix factorization. Proceedings 2019, 27, 13. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yousefi, B.; Castanedo, C.I.; Maldague, X.P. Measuring heterogeneous thermal patterns in infrared-based diagnostic systems using sparse low-rank matrix approximation: Comparative study. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 70, 4501209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yousefi, B.; Sharifipour, H.M.; Maldague, X.P. A Diagnostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer Screening via Hilbert Embedded Deep Low-Rank Matrix Approximation. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 4504809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yousefi, B.; Hershman, M.; Fernandes, H.C.; Maldague, X.P. Concentrated Thermomics for Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Eng. Proc. 2021, 8, 30. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vigil, N.; Nouri, B.M.; Fernandes, H.C.; Ibarra-Castanedo, C.; Maldague, X.P.; Yousefi, B. Convex Factorization Embedding Thermography for Breast Cancer Diagnostic. IEEE Open J. Instrum. Meas. 2022, 1, 4500408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Papoulis, A.; Unnikrishna Pillai, S. Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill Europe: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  24. Silva, L.F.; Saade, D.C.M.; Sequeiros, G.O.; Silva, A.C.; Paiva, A.C.; Bravo, R.S.; Conci, A. A new database forbreast research with infrared image. J. Med. Imaging Health Inform. 2014, 4, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Eight random cases, four cancer patients (ad) and four healthy cases (eh) using Rayleigh embedding.
Figure 1. Eight random cases, four cancer patients (ad) and four healthy cases (eh) using Rayleigh embedding.
Engproc 51 00038 g001
Table 1. The results of cross-validated random forest classification model.
Table 1. The results of cross-validated random forest classification model.
ModelMethodRayleigh/Weibull
Embedding
Classification
Accuracy 2 (%)
Random ForestClinical 173.6 (± 9.5)73.6 (±9.5)
CCIPCT80.0 (66.7, 80.0)76.9 (45.7, 85.8)
PCT80.0 (73.3, 85.7)76.9 (45.7, 85.6)
NMF80.0 (73.3, 85.7)76.9 (45.8, 85.7)
Sparse PCT80.0 (53.3, 85.7)77.6 (45.7, 87.4)
Deep SemiNMF82.9 (66.7, 86.7)76.4 (45.7, 84.8)
Convex-NMF78.6 (73.3, 85.7)76.9 (73.7, 86.1)
1 The covariates used for the clinical and demographics were family history, age and marital status. 2 Classification accuracy reported by median (±IQR) (interquartile range-IQR) from Bell embedding [22].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yousefi, B.; Maldague, X.P.V.; Hassanipour, F. Diagnostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer Applying Rayleigh Low-Rank Embedding Thermography. Eng. Proc. 2023, 51, 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023051038

AMA Style

Yousefi B, Maldague XPV, Hassanipour F. Diagnostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer Applying Rayleigh Low-Rank Embedding Thermography. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 51(1):38. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023051038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yousefi, Bardia, Xavier P. V. Maldague, and Fatemeh Hassanipour. 2023. "Diagnostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer Applying Rayleigh Low-Rank Embedding Thermography" Engineering Proceedings 51, no. 1: 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023051038

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop