Next Article in Journal
Design and Modelling of MEMS Resonators for an Artificial Basilar Membrane
Previous Article in Journal
Ion-Selective Electrode (ISE) Based on Polyvinyl Chloride Membrane Formed from Heterocyclic Quinazoline Compounds as Ionophore material
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Advances in Electronic Nose Sensors for Plant Disease and Pest Detection †

by
Ana Fundurulic
1,*,
Jorge M. S. Faria
1,2 and
Maria L. Inácio
1,3
1
INIAV, I.P., National Institute for Agrarian and Veterinary Research, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159 Oeiras, Portugal
2
MED, Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Évora University, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal
3
GREEN-IT Bioresources for Sustainability, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (ITQB NOVA), Av. da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Chemical Sensors and Analytical Chemistry, 16–30 September 2023; Available online: https://csac2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 48(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/CSAC2023-14890
Published: 20 September 2023

Abstract

:
The spread of invasive pests is accelerated by globalization and changes in climate conditions, posing a significant threat to agricultural and forest ecosystems. Advances in electronic nose sensors (e-noses) have opened new avenues for monitoring and detecting plant diseases and pests through the analysis of emitted volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The current work reviews the most recent developments in e-nose sensors and their application in plant disease and pest detection over the past five years. It also explores the challenges associated with VOC detection in agricultural settings where field sampling has a focal role in monitoring and management.

1. Introduction

Invasive pests and pathogens pose a significant threat to plant health for the agronomy and forestry sectors. These organisms invade new geographic areas where they proliferate and damage the environment by altering ecosystems, often leading to the extinction of native species or damaging agricultural production [1]. Since they disrupt the delicate environmental balance by outcompeting native species, plant pests contribute to the spread of diseases, reduce crop yield, and lead to economic losses and/or food shortage for communities. Moreover, they can have long-lasting impacts on the environment, altering habitats and reducing biodiversity [2]. In the last few decades, the spread of plant pests has been accelerated through an increased movement of materials, goods, as well as by large-scale trade and travel. Furthermore, warmer temperatures and changes in precipitation patterns enable pests to expand their geographic range into regions where they previously could not survive or reproduce successfully. Such fluctuations in climate conditions, and the increased frequency of extreme events, can impact the health and resilience of native plants, making them more susceptible to invasive pests. The loss of biodiversity can intensify the spread of invasive pests, through a disruption of, e.g., natural predators, creating conditions that favour the proliferation of specific pests [3].
Phytophagous insects are at the forefront of pest invasions; however, it is important to keep in mind that extremely damaging plant pests also include disease-causing nematodes and parasitic protozoa as well as microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses and fungi. The European Commission recognized and designated 20 priority pests in the list of quarantine pests [4], whose economic, environmental, and social impact on EU territory is the most severe. Of these, four are non-insect pests, namely Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (nematode), Candidatus Liberibacter spp. (bacteria), Phyllosticta citricarpa (fungus) and Xylella fastidiosa (bacteria). The list is based on impact assessments carried out by The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC). The assessments considered a number of indicators such as impact on crop yields, damage to trade and the cost of control measures, social consequences such as unemployment, reduced food safety and security, as well as impact on landscapes and damage to the environment, e.g., reduced biodiversity and ecosystem services.
This underlines the relevance of controlling and managing invasive pests, practices that are essential for safeguarding plant health, preserving agricultural productivity, and maintaining the overall ecological balance. Therefore, the development of novel concepts for the timely and non-destructive pest detection and management of serious plant pests, both during import and in the field, is of the utmost importance. The application of electronic nose (e-nose) sensors contributes to the prevention and control of plant diseases by swiftly detecting changes in volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by plants when they are infected or stressed, allowing for early intervention and targeted management strategies to curb disease spread.

2. Technology and Rapid Detection of Plant Diseases and Pests

2.1. Electronic Nose (e-Nose) Sensors

E-noses are devices that detect and analyse volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from targeted samples and have found wide applications in quality control, environmental monitoring, and agriculture [5], as well as proven to be a useful tool in plant protection [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The main constituents of an e-nose system are a sensor array, the signal conditioning unit, and a pattern recognition algorithm. E-nose systems utilize sensor arrays to generate a distinct response to specific VOCs and pattern recognition software for resolution and identification. When a sample is exposed to the sensor array, it triggers a reversible physical or chemical change in the sensing material, leading to alterations in its electrical properties. These changes are transformed into electrical signals, which are pre-processed and conditioned for identification by a pattern recognition system [14]. Therefore, the e-nose system ensures a unique overall response pattern from the array for a specific VOC within a group of VOCs considered by the system.
To improve sensitivity, selectivity and the ability to detect a wide range of VOCs, different sensor types can be employed. The most utilized classes of sensors are conductivity sensors, gravimetric sensors, and optical sensors [15]. Conductivity sensors employ conducting polymers (CP) and metal oxide semiconductors (MOS), while gravimetric sensors include surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors and quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) sensors. Another approach to VOC identification in e-nose systems involves optical sensor arrays [11]. The choice of sensors depends on factors such as targeted applications, desired detection capabilities, and environmental conditions, and must take into consideration the specific biological parameters of the targeted pest or disease.

2.2. Progression of Scientific Output

Over the past two decades, there has been a growing research interest in the application of e-noses for detecting plant pests (Figure 1). However, a comprehensive review of the bibliographic data using the Web of Science search engine, encompassing all available databases and published works that report the application of e-noses to detect volatiles of pests or pest-related diseases, reveals that the intensity of research has fairly increased in the last five years. By researching the topics of “nose”, “volatiles” and “pest” from 2019 to 2023, a total of 12 publications were identified reporting the use of electronic sensors for detecting plant pests and diseases.
The journals where these works were published cover mainly the scientific fields of chemistry (25%), plant sciences (24%), engineering (19%), agriculture (16%) and environmental sciences (16%) (Figure 2). The listed publications were cited in 79 works, with an average of seven citations per work. These citations were included in journals specialized in chemistry, plant sciences, environmental sciences, agriculture, instruments and instrumentation, engineering, and molecular biology. The plants that receive the most attention include Poaceae, e.g., wheat, Solanaceae, e.g., tomato, Oleaceae, e.g., olive and green ash, Theaceae, e.g., tea, Rutaceae and Cupressaceae [6,7,8,13,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Furthermore, since 2019, the cumulative number of citations of all publications (2003 to 2023) on this topic has greatly increased, indicating a surge in application and research.

3. Advantages and Challenges

3.1. VOC Profiles for Plant Pest Detection

The development of technologies in plant pest detection minimizes the reliance on subjective human judgment and offers consistent, objective results, providing consistent and data-driven insights to optimize pest management practices and ensure sustainable plant health. E-nose-based detection drastically reduces the time needed for analysis compared to conventional methods for VOCs identification and enables early intervention and immediate response to mitigate plant pest infestations. It is a non-invasive method of pest detection, minimizing harm to plants and reducing the need for extensive manual inspections. High sensitivity enables e-noses to detect pests at low infestation levels, helping the implementation of targeted pest management strategies and reducing the need for excessive pesticide use. Furthermore, e-noses can be integrated into real-time monitoring systems.
As stated before, the appropriate e-nose sensor relies upon the specific application, nature of the sample and the environment. Recognizing the value and advantages of customizing e-nose devices for specific tasks [22] rather than aiming for a general-purpose device that works for a wide range of gas-sensing uses results in a more accurate, efficient, and reliable tool. Targeting specific pests offers a precise, user-friendly, and cost-effective approach for larger scale pest control. However, e-nose technology faces several challenges.
Plant environments often contain complex mixtures of VOCs, including compounds from sources other than the plants themselves. For differentiating pest-specific profiles within these mixtures, structured research and comprehensive databases of both plant-specific volatiles and pest VOCs are necessary. Additionally, pests of the same species can exhibit variations in VOC emissions based on such factors as age, sex, and physiological state, or the plant may even be infected with different pests and diseases simultaneously, complicating an accurate identification. Therefore, validating e-nose results against traditional pest detection methods is essential to ensure the accuracy of the e-nose approach. The extensive data generated by e-noses requires advanced data analysis techniques, including pattern recognition and machine learning. To compare obtained results across different studies and/or devices, standardized protocols should be outlined.

3.2. In Situ Detection

Profiling of plant VOCs is conventionally carried out in a sealed chamber with controlled temperature and humidity, which simulate the environment of a greenhouse and the field [15]. Yet, the most powerful approach in larger scale pest control is obtaining real-time, accurate, and contextually relevant data for decision-making and intervention in the field. Still, deploying e-nose in outdoor agricultural settings requires addressing challenges like sensor stability, power sources, and data communication. As changes in environmental conditions, such as temperature, humidity, and background, can affect sensor responses, tailored and targeted devices become even more important.
Addressing the complexity and variability of VOC profiles when using e-nose technology in the field requires a multifaceted approach. Appropriate sensor selection targeting specific VOC profiles, multivariate analysis, baseline correction, and regular equipment calibration help enhance data accuracy and reliability. Simultaneous environmental monitoring, which records temperature, humidity, wind direction, GPS location, and other relevant factors that could influence VOC emissions, alongside VOC measurements, can provide context and validation [23]. Machine learning and pattern recognition models aid in interpreting complex VOC profiles [24], while real-time monitoring facilitates quick responses and adjustments in the field.
The advancement of smaller, lightweight, and portable e-nose devices offers a more efficient means for early disease diagnosis in field scenarios. To enhance practicality for plant pest detection, especially in open-field situations, the development of small-scale sensor arrays utilizing integrated circuit technologies and micro-electromechanical systems [25] can lead to the production of highly portable and cost-effective detectors. The costs can be mitigated by 3D printing of some components. Also, the coupling of e-nose with a drone allows sampling on the larger surfaces or infected plant communities [12]. These advances allow real-time monitoring and the creation of field-deployable devices tuned to specific plants, pests, seasonal variations, and sample locations, providing more effective means of achieving early disease diagnoses in the field. Research is ongoing to develop specialized equipment based on e-noses; for example, a project financed by European Commission [26] is developing an innovative sensor platform that can rapidly detect different pests during import and in the field to stop their establishment and reduce pesticide inputs in Europe. Five pests were selected for the first optimization that include insects, nematodes and Oomycota, but will be extended to other important pests in later stages. Headspace GC-MS is being employed to profile VOCs and then used to fine-tune sensor components for the development of optimized sensor systems. Ultimately, a sensor system prototype will be validated in the field and at import control sites, leading to the development of a powerful e-nose-based specialized tool that can boost European plant pest control.

4. Conclusions

Advances in e-nose sensors have enhanced the approach to plant disease and pest detection. Key developments in e-noses include improved sensing technology, advanced data analysis techniques, real-time monitoring, portable and field-deployable devices and disease differentiation leading to early detection and prevention as well as reduced environmental impact. In addition to technological improvement, effectively addressing current challenges of plant pest control requires international cooperation, rigorous biosecurity measures, early detection systems, and inclusive management strategies to minimize the impact of invasive pests on agricultural and ecosystems. The application of e-nose contributes to efficient, sustainable, and environmentally conscious agricultural practices, with the potential to transform how we manage plant health issues. This ensures both economic viability and ecological responsibility.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F. and J.M.S.F.; methodology, J.M.S.F.; formal analysis, A.F.; investigation, A.F.; resources, J.M.S.F. and M.L.I.; data curation, A.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.F.; writing—review and editing, J.M.S.F. and M.L.I.; project administration, J.M.S.F. and M.L.I.; funding acquisition, J.M.S.F. and M.L.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly funded by the EU under the PurPest project through grant agreement 101060634, and by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), through project NemACT, grant number 2022.00359.CEECIND.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (Ana Fundurulic) upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mack, R.N.; Simberloff, D.; Mark Lonsdale, W.; Evans, H.; Clout, M.; Bazzaz, F.A. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10, 689–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chappell, M.J.; LaValle, L.A. Food security and biodiversity: Can we have both? An agroecological analysis. Agric. Hum. Values 2011, 28, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Skendžić, S.; Zovko, M.; Živković, I.P.; Lešić, V.; Lemić, D. The Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Insect Pests. Insects 2021, 12, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. European Commission. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1702 of 1 August 2019 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the list of priority pests. Off. J. Eur. Union 2019, 260, 8–10. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2019/1702/oj/eng (accessed on 1 August 2023).
  5. Wilson, A.D. Applications of Electronic-Nose Technologies for Noninvasive Early Detection of Plant, Animal and Human Diseases. Chemosensors 2018, 6, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kishimoto, N.; Kashiwagi, A. Prediction of specific odor markers in oil from olive fruit infested with olive scale using an electronic nose. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN), Fukuoka, Japan, 26–29 May 2019; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wilson, A.D.; Forse, L.B.; Babst, B.A.; Bataineh, M.M. Detection of Emerald Ash Borer Infestations in Living Green Ash by Noninvasive Electronic-Nose Analysis of Wood Volatiles. Biosensors 2019, 9, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y. Evaluation of Semanotus bifasciatus (Motschulsky) infestation in Platycladus orientalis plants using E-nose and GC-MS. Trans. ASABE 2020, 63, 1629–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wilson, A.D. Noninvasive Early Disease Diagnosis by Electronic-Nose and Related VOC-Detection Devices. Biosensors 2020, 10, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ivaskovic, P.; Ainseba, B.E.; Nicolas, Y.; Toupance, T.; Tardy, P.; Thiéry, D. Sensing of airborne infochemicals for green pest management: What is the challenge? ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 3824–3840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zheng, Z.; Zhang, C. Electronic noses based on metal oxide semiconductor sensors for detecting crop diseases and insect pests. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 197, 106988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hüttnerová, T.; Paczkowski, S.; Neubert, T.; Jirošová, A.; Surový, P. Comparison of Individual Sensors in the Electronic Nose for Stress Detection in Forest Stands. Sensors 2023, 23, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tian, Y.; Ping, S.; Zhang, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, Z.; Cai, X. Assessing Artemisia lavandulaefolia as a trap plant for managing Apolygus lucorum in tea plantations. Entomol. Exp. Et Appl. 2023, 171, 206–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arshak, K.; Moore, E.; Lyons, G.M.; Harris, J.; Clifford, S. A review of gas sensors employed in electronic nose applications. Sens. Rev. 2004, 24, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cui, S.; Ling, P.; Zhu, H.; Keener, H.M. Plant pest detection using an artificial nose system: A review. Sensors 2018, 18, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mishra, G.; Srivastava, S.; Panda, B.K.; Mishra, H.N. Prediction of Sitophilus granarius infestation in stored wheat grain using multivariate chemometrics & fuzzy logic-based electronic nose analysis. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 152, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cui, S.; Inocente, E.A.A.; Acosta, N.; Keener, H.M.; Zhu, H.; Ling, P.P. Development of fast e-nose system for early-stage diagnosis of aphid-stressed tomato plants. Sensors 2019, 19, 3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; Sun, L.; Cheng, S.; Xiao, Q. Evaluation of E-nose data analyses for discrimination of tea plants with different damage types. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2019, 126, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; Cheng, S.; Wang, Y. Detection of pest species with different ratios in tea plant based on electronic nose. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2019, 174, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Z.; Chen, W.; Gu, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J. Evaluation of trunk borer infestation duration using MOS E-nose combined with different feature extraction methods and GS-SVM. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 170, 105293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hazarika, S.; Choudhury, R.; Montazer, B.; Medhi, S.; Goswami, M.P.; Sarma, U. Detection of citrus tristeza virus in mandarin orange using a custom-developed electronic nose system. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 69, 9010–9018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wilson, A.D. Diverse Applications of Electronic-Nose Technologies in Agriculture and Forestry. Sensors 2013, 13, 2295–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jońca, J.; Pawnuk, M.; Arsen, A.; Sówka, I. Electronic Noses and Their Applications for Sensory and Analytical Measurements in the Waste Management Plants—A Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kaushal, S.; Nayi, P.; Rahadian, D.; Chen, H.-H. Applications of Electronic Nose Coupled with Statistical and Intelligent Pattern Recognition Techniques for Monitoring Tea Quality: A Review. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vasiliev, A.A.; Pisliakov, A.V.; Sokolov, A.V.; Samotaev, N.N.; Soloviev, S.A.; Oblov, K.; Guarnieri, V.; Lorenzelli, L.; Brunelli, J.; Maglione, A.; et al. Non-silicon MEMS platforms for gas sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 224, 700–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. European Commission. Plant Pest Prevention through Technology-Guided Monitoring and Site-Specific Control. 2023. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101060634 (accessed on 1 August 2023).
Figure 1. Cumulative number of published works reporting on the application of e-noses to detect volatiles of pests or pest-related diseases, obtained from Web of Science (https://www.webofknowledge.com, accessed on 14 July 2023).
Figure 1. Cumulative number of published works reporting on the application of e-noses to detect volatiles of pests or pest-related diseases, obtained from Web of Science (https://www.webofknowledge.com, accessed on 14 July 2023).
Engproc 48 00014 g001
Figure 2. Scientific fields covered by the journals of the publications on electronic noses identified from 2019–2023 according to Web of Science (https://www.webofknowledge.com, accessed 14 July 2023).
Figure 2. Scientific fields covered by the journals of the publications on electronic noses identified from 2019–2023 according to Web of Science (https://www.webofknowledge.com, accessed 14 July 2023).
Engproc 48 00014 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fundurulic, A.; Faria, J.M.S.; Inácio, M.L. Advances in Electronic Nose Sensors for Plant Disease and Pest Detection. Eng. Proc. 2023, 48, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/CSAC2023-14890

AMA Style

Fundurulic A, Faria JMS, Inácio ML. Advances in Electronic Nose Sensors for Plant Disease and Pest Detection. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 48(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/CSAC2023-14890

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fundurulic, Ana, Jorge M. S. Faria, and Maria L. Inácio. 2023. "Advances in Electronic Nose Sensors for Plant Disease and Pest Detection" Engineering Proceedings 48, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/CSAC2023-14890

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop