Next Article in Journal
Practical Research on Mixed-PPGIS Promoting Public Participation in Urban Micro-Public Space Renewal
Previous Article in Journal
Features and Prospects of Industry 4.0 in the Agrarian Sector of Ukraine in Wartime: Economic and Accounting Aspects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Precursory Study on Sustained Development in Food and Agriculture Education in the Post-Legislative Era †

by
Jiin-Chyuan Mark Lai
1,
Chiung-Ling Wang
2 and
Ming-Yuan Hsieh
3,*
1
Department of Applied Foreign Languages, TransWorld University, Douliu City 640302, Taiwan
2
Department of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City 244014, Taiwan
3
Department of International Business, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung City 403061, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Electronic Communications, Internet of Things and Big Data Conference 2023, Taichung, Taiwan, 14–16 April 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 38(1), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023038083
Published: 20 July 2023

Abstract

:
We analyze the recent media reports related to food and agriculture education (FAE) in Taiwan and present the main aspects of the FAE in different ways such as historical society and ethics, food and agriculture industry and responsibility, food and agriculture culture preservation, and education and health promotion. The reports are classified into seven categories: culture, life, agriculture, campus, society, environment, and industry. The results point out the enhancement of the sustained development of the FAE in the post-legislative era due to the increased consolidated relationships among the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and FAE in the food (production and marketing certification), agriculture (commercializing organic agriculture certification), and travel (friendly conservation tourism). Further research needs to focus on the main evaluated aspects of FAE that appear more frequently in the related research for the promotion of education and health, and historical and ethical justice. FAE seems to be preferred in the metropolitan area while teaching in the cultural field is more important in the non-metropolitan area than in the metropolitan area, which needs further study.

1. Introduction

The global environment has been affected by human and non-human factors such as climate change, the COVID-19 epidemic, and the war between Russia and Ukraine. Thus, issues related to food and agriculture education (FAE) have been important in human life. The public has paid extra attention to the security of food and agriculture, the self-sufficiency rate of food, and agricultural sustainability through social media reports, videos, and articles. People consider food an important source of nutrition and energy and the production, quality, supply, and distribution of food are critical. Countries emphasize FAE to ensure the stability of production and sales of foods and confirm safe food sources and origins such as organic farming, soil optimization, farming method, and others. The ultimate goal of the sustainable development of agriculture cannot be achieved with food safety problems and polluted agricultural production [1].
FAE has dealt with complexities in the economy, society, politics, culture, and communication as food and diet is important for human beings. Food helps humans avoid sickness and weakness and affects human relationships and even the management of political power. Food and diet influence a person’s attitude and define human identity, as what people eat has affected cultural development. Food culture has transformed history and civilization as it is related to botany, physics and chemistry, agriculture, animal science, agronomy, ecology, anthropology, sociology, geopolitics, political economy, trade, technology, cooking, physiology, medicine, and philosophy. Food and diet impact various social, environmental, and economic phenomena as they are combined with culture, tradition, and community sustainability [2].
Therefore, sustainable development goals (SDGs) have been proposed to solve those problems. As a result, FAE-related initiatives have been promoted among governments, industries, academia, and civil societies all over the world. Societal innovation and integration are integrated into the SDGs to propose the “sociSDGs”. The consolidation of the SDGs and FAE covers the issues of a diversified economy, environment, and social dimensions, including hunger, malnutrition, desertification, water resource use, loss of biodiversity, overconsumption, obesity, and public health. A new FAE, then, is proposed to achieve the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, tenth, eleventh, and twelfth goals of the SDGs [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. To connect SDGs and FAE, the United Nations Committee on World Food Security established the International Agri-Food Network in which FAE is combined with the seventeen goals of the SDGs from multiple perspectives of sustainable development [10,11,12,13].
Recently, international communities and Taiwan have set up social enterprises to advocate eco-friendly agriculture and organic farming integrating educational, industrial, and social entities for sustainable development in a new research mainstream. Empirically, each government has an obligated responsibility to establish the comprehensive development of the FAE system by constructing a certification system for food (production and marketing certification), agriculture (commercializing organic agriculture certification), and travel (conservation-friendly tourism) [14,15,16]. Frequent food safety incidents over the past ten years have allowed widespread attention and support for FAE from the public, especially the melamine-tainted milk powder incident that occurred in September 2008 that affected mainland China and Taiwan and raised awareness of food safety in the entire Taiwanese society. Other infamous food safety-related incidents occurred including the poisoned oil mixed with low-cost sunflower and cottonseed oils in 2011, the copper chlorophyll added coloring in 2013, and waste oil blended into edible oils in 2014.
FAE has been adopted and developed in many countries without educational consideration for many years but food and agriculture environment education (FAEE) is still necessary to create sustainability based on the original FAE that has educational functions and social movements. Innovation is required in “unsustainable solutions” to solve the unsustainability of FAE. The most significant reason is that FAE has been only a duty of the government but in fact, is an obligation of the public. Thus, the Taiwanese Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the Ministry of Health and Welfare has taken practical action to promote the importance of food hygiene and safety through websites, social media, and exhibitions. At the same time, each educational institution has strengthened activities regarding FAE. In addition, the Taiwanese National Health Administration of the Ministry of Health and Welfare has supervised the catering industry and schools to reduce chronic diseases caused by diet through multiple channels including regulations, rules, and policies.
To effectively allay the deep doubts about food safety, governments have increased their concerns and the supervision of the agriculture and food industries. In Taiwan, the Food Safety Office is in charge of food safety based on the “Eight Food Strengthening Measures” and the “Food Safety Five Rings” legislated in 2014 and 2016. Since food and agricultural issues are related to health and the environment and food safety is related to the welfare of people, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Ministry of the Interior, and the Ministry of Education are involved in the “education” of food and agriculture. Since 2007, the Council of Agriculture, which is closely related to the FAE has been planning and promoting the “do-it-yourself” approach and the “four health” system in the framework of FAE. Therefore, the responsibility of manufacturers and farmers has increased with the increase in people’s awareness of food safety.
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) pay more attention to FAE issues for eco-friendly agriculture, the fair trade of food and agricultural products, and a low-carbon diet. The “Four Health Association of the Republic of China” has implemented “Food Education in Primary School” through the “Seed Teacher Camp” for mentor training of FAE from 2013 [17,18,19]. According to the demand for sustainable development, the Ministry of Education has revised the “School Health Law” to add an article of “health-related courses” in Article 16: “The first health-related courses should include healthy eating education to establish correct eating habits to develop respect for life and nature and to enhance awareness of environmental protection, deepen understanding of the source of food materials, and understand the food culture of the country and region. Schools should encourage students to participate in the school meal preparation process” [20]. In 2015, the article was stipulated in the law, providing a legal foundation for schools at all levels to promote FAE [21]. The government, academia, and civil society are trying to execute FAE and conduct all the related legislative processes, as the “Food and Agriculture Education Law” (FAEL) has passed and taken effect as of 2022 under the request of the society. Thus, FAE promotes a complete legislative foundation that gives accountability, rights, and responsibilities to all relevant competent authorities and the implementation procedures. The FAEL combines educational concepts for sustainability.
This research explores the concepts related to FAE in the world and investigates how sustainable development can be developed in the “educational concepts” of the Taiwanese food and agriculture environment and education (TFAEE). TFAEE is defined as a framework to construct food and agriculture education to help sustainable development. Based on the above review, the elements of food (production and marketing certification), agriculture (commercializing organic agriculture certification), and travel (eco-friendly conservation and tourism) are determined to discuss the sustained development in FAE under the research framework shown in Figure 1 [22].

2. Research Concept

The SDGs were set by the United Nations to replace the Millennium Development Goals. SDGs are being implemented from 2016 to 2030 with 17 goals and 169 sub-targets [23,24]. The 17 goals of the SDGs are as follows:
(1)
No poverty: eradicating poverty in all its forms everywhere;
(2)
Zero hunger: ensuring food security, eradicating hunger, and promoting sustainable agriculture;
(3)
Good health and well-being: ensuring and promoting healthy living and well-being at all ages;
(4)
Quality education: ensuring access to education without discrimination, fairness, and high-quality education, and promoting lifelong learning;
(5)
Gender equality: achieving gender equality and empowering women;
(6)
Clean water and sanitation: ensuring access to water, sanitation, and its sustainable management for all;
(7)
Affordable and clean energy: ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all;
(8)
Decent work and economic growth: promoting inclusive and sustainable economic growth with good jobs for everyone;
(9)
Industry, innovation, and infrastructure: building resilient infrastructure, promoting inclusive and sustainable industries, and accelerating innovation;
(10)
Reduced inequalities: reducing inequality within and between countries;
(11)
Sustainable cities and communities: building cities and villages that are inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable;
(12)
Responsible consumption and production: promoting a green economy and ensuring sustainable consumption and production patterns;
(13)
Climate action: completing mitigation and adaptation actions to address climate change and its impacts;
(14)
Life below water: executing conservation and sustainable use of marine ecosystems to ensure biodiversity and prevent degradation of the marine environment;
(15)
Life on land: implementing conservation and sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, ensuring biodiversity, and preventing land degradation;
(16)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions: promoting peaceful and pluralistic societies, ensuring judicial equality, and building credible and inclusive systems;
(17)
Partnerships for the goals: establishing multiple partnerships and working together to promote a sustainable vision.

3. Conclusions and Future Direction

We review the media reports related to the FAE in Taiwan and present the main aspects of FAE in historical and societal ethics, the food and agriculture industry and responsibility, food and agriculture culture preservation, and education and health promotion. Seven categories are defined as culture, life, agriculture, campus, society, environment, and industry. The enhancement of the sustained development in FAE with legislation is found according to the increasingly consolidated relationship between SDGs and FAE. Further research is needed to focus on the issues that appear more frequently in the current food and agriculture education and research. FAE may be preferred in the metropolitan area while teaching cultural subjects is more acceptable in the non-metropolitan area. Therefore, the cross-analysis of teaching and training is also necessary.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-C.M.L. and M.-Y.H.; methodology, M.-Y.H.; validation, J.-C.M.L.; formal analysis, M.-Y.H.; investigation, J.-C.M.L.; resources, J.-C.M.L. and C.-L.W.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-Y.H. and C.-L.W.; writing—review and editing, M.-Y.H.; visualization, J.-C.M.L.; supervision, M.-Y.H.; project administration, M.-Y.H.; funding acquisition, C.-L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the research projects (MOST 110-2420-H-002-003-MY3-Y11209) of the Ministry of Science and Technology and (NTCU111103) and the National Taichung University of Education.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This research did not execute the questionnaires and interview and hence, this research did not require ethical approval.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable because this research did not involve any humans.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflict of interest in this research.

References

  1. FAO. Available online: http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ca8996en (accessed on 23 March 2023).
  2. FAO. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/y4671e/y4671e06.htm (accessed on 11 January 2023).
  3. Ashraf, S.A.; Siddiqui, A.J.; Elkhalifa, A.E.O.; Khan, M.I.; Patel, M.; Alreshidi, M. Innovations in nanoscience for the sustainable development of food and agriculture with implications on health and environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 768, 144990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bryngelsson, D.; Wirsenius, S.; Hedenus, F.; Sonesson, U. How can the EU climate targets be met? A combined analysis of technological and demand-side changes in food and agriculture. Food Policy 2016, 59, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. OECD/FAO. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1787/19991142 (accessed on 23 March 2023).
  6. Baig, I.A.; Chandio, A.A.; Ozturk, I.; Kumar, P.; Khan, Z.A.; Salam, M. Assessing the long-and short-run asymmetrical effects of climate change on rice production: Empirical evidence from India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 34209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gupta, R.; Mishra, A. Climate change induced impact and uncertainty of rice yield of agro-ecological zones of India. Agric. Syst. 2019, 173, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hossain, M.; Islam, M.; Sujan, M.; Khan, H.; Tuhin, M.; Bekun, F.V. Towards a clean production by exploring the nexus between agricultural ecosystem and environmental degradation using novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 53768–53784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Praveen, B.; Sharma, P. Climate change and its impacts on Indian agriculture: An econometric analysis. J. Public Aff. 2020, 20, e1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hsieh, Y.M. Interdisciplinarily Exploring the Most Potential IoT Technology Determinants in the Omnichannel E-Commerce Purchasing Decision-Making Processes. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hsieh, Y.M. The most sustainable niche principles of social-media education in a higher education contracting era. Sustainability 2020, 12, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Huang, Y.-M.; Hsieh, Y.M.; Usak, M. A Multi-Criteria Study of Decision-Making Proficiency in Student’s Employability for Multidisciplinary Curriculums. Mathematics 2020, 8, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chan, Y.-K.; Hsieh, M.-Y.; Usak, M. A Concrete Study on Social-Media Connection of Global Literacy Abilities in MOOCs under the Dual Impacts of Lower Birth-Rate and COVID-19. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Usak, M.; Hsieh, M.-Y.; Chan, Y.-K. A Concertizing Research on Making Higher Education Sustainability Count. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Duran, M.; Usak, M.; Hsieh, M.-Y.; Uygun, H. A New Perspective on Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Intellectual and Emotional Characteristics of Science Teachers. RCIS 2021, 72, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, T.-L.; Hsieh, M.-Y.; Min, K.-W.; Yu, M.-T.; Ho, C.-T. Use of Sensor Technologies in Online Courses in Post-COVID-19 Era. Sens. Mater. 2021, 33, 2045–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, C.C.; Chan, Y.-K.; Hsieh, M.Y. The Determinants of ESG for Community LOHASism Sustainable Development Strategy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chan, Y.-K.; Hsieh, M.Y. An Empirical Study on Higher Education C-ESG Sustainable Development Strategy in Lower-Birth-Rate Era. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hsieh, Y.-M. Online learning era: Exploring the most decisive determinants of MOOCs in Taiwanese higher education. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2016, 12, 1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hsieh, Y.-M. Employing MCDM methodology to verify correlationship between social media and service quality in the dynamic m-commerce era. J. Internet Technol. 2018, 19, 225. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hsieh, Y.-M.; Usak, M. High Education Radical Transformation Era: How Teachers’ Competency can Enhance the Students’ Employability. RCIS 2020, 68, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, Y.-M.; Hsieh, Y.M. An Interdisciplinary Research on Students’ Employability in Technology Education to Advance Higher Education Enrollment Sustainability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hsieh, M.Y. The Sustainable Development and Strategic Approaches for Contemporary Higher Education. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, C.-C.; Chan, Y.-K.; Hsieh, M.-Y. Preliminary Research on the Sustainable Determinants of Taiwanese Ecotourism with the International Standards. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Research framework.
Figure 1. Research framework.
Engproc 38 00083 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lai, J.-C.M.; Wang, C.-L.; Hsieh, M.-Y. Precursory Study on Sustained Development in Food and Agriculture Education in the Post-Legislative Era. Eng. Proc. 2023, 38, 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023038083

AMA Style

Lai J-CM, Wang C-L, Hsieh M-Y. Precursory Study on Sustained Development in Food and Agriculture Education in the Post-Legislative Era. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 38(1):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023038083

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lai, Jiin-Chyuan Mark, Chiung-Ling Wang, and Ming-Yuan Hsieh. 2023. "Precursory Study on Sustained Development in Food and Agriculture Education in the Post-Legislative Era" Engineering Proceedings 38, no. 1: 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023038083

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop