Next Article in Journal
Sustainability Assessment of Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Preface of the International Conference on Electronics, Engineering Physics and Earth Science (EEPES’23)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Process Engineering for Low-Temperature Carbon-Based Perovskite Solar Modules †

1
CHOSE—Centre for Hybrid and Organic Solar Energy, Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Roma, Italy
2
ISM-CNR, Istituto di Struttura della Materia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Roma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Processes: Process Engineering—Current State and Future Trends (ECP 2023), 17–31 May 2023; Available online: https://ecp2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 37(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECP2023-14721
Published: 25 May 2023

Abstract

:
In less than a decade, Perovskite solar cell (PSC) technology has gained high efficiency and broad attention because of its key enabling physical and morphological features. One of the main obstacles to PSC industrialization and commercialization is managed with the demonstration of stable devices by adopting low-cost, reliable materials and fabrication process methods. Here, we report a Perovskite solar module based on a low-temperature carbon electrode. The full process was performed in ambient air and engineered by printing techniques.

1. Introduction

The photovoltaic (PV) sector has a fundamental role in covering the energy demand caused by the constant and never-ending technology progress [1]. To date, the PV market is based mainly on the “first generation” technology, i.e., monocrystalline and polycrystalline silicon. Despite that, the expensive manufacturing processes of silicon and its decreasing availability in nature have accelerated the “second generation” thin-film technologies exploitation based on materials such as cadmium telluride (CdTe) and amorphous silicon (a-Si) [2]. The “third generation” PV based on hybrid-organic materials was born to maintain high efficiency by reducing process fabrication costs [3,4,5,6]. Natural dyes such as anthocyanins [7], polymers [8], or fullerenes [9] are just a few examples of molecules used for this purpose. The main issues concerning these new technologies are the stability and upscaling from lab scale cells (area ˂ 1 cm2) to modules (interconnection of cells) [10].
In the recent years, Perovskite (PVSK) gained attention from scientists and investors because of its optical and electronic properties allowing a continuous development reaching record efficiencies (close to 26%) [11,12,13,14]. PVSK is a chemical compound with ABX3 formula, where A and B are cations with different atomic radii and X represents an anion. PVSK-based materials organometallic compounds of halogens have gathered particular interest in the PV field thanks to the easy processability by solution-based methods [15].
Each layer forming a PVSK solar cell (PSC) has a well-defined function affecting the performance and the stability of the device. The PVSK is sandwiched between one electron transport layer (ETL) and a hole transport layer (HTL). The ETL and HTL are both connected to an external circuit by gold or silver contacts. In the case of n-i-p architecture, ETL is generally composed by c-TiO2 (compact TiO2) and mp-TiO2 (mesoporous TiO2) or SnO2 and guarantees good conduction, low charge recombination, and high transparency. The most widespread HTM (hole transporting material) is the 2,2′,7,7′-Tetrakis(N,Ndi-p-methoxyphenylamine)-9,9′- spirobifluorene. Spiro-MeOTAD ensures good energy levels of band gap, quick charge transfer, and low recombination, however, it has low stability, high cost (about 200 euro/g), complex synthesis, and low yield [16]. Moreover, spiro-OMeTAD is doped to increase the mobility of the holes with highly hygroscopic salts (lithiumbis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (Li-TFSI) or 4-tert-butylpyridine (t-BP)) leading to PSC degradation and deterioration. In addition, the gold metal counter-electrode diffuses into the structure of the device when exposed to continuous lighting, causing huge PVSK degradation. Both the organic HTL and the metal electrode can be replaced with one low temperature conductive carbon layer. Carbon materials are cheap if compared to HTMs and gold, resulting in a reduction in cells cost and an increase in stability. Carbon is a key material widely used in the PV field due to its abundance, low cost, and appropriate energy level. In the PVSK field, low temperature carbon pastes, unlike the porous high temperature inks [17,18], can be processed at temperatures below 130 °C, exhibiting features of high conductivity, low cost, good stability, and high throughput process [18,19,20,21,22,23].
In this paper, we demonstrate a simple process based on scalable printing techniques out of the glove-box to fabricate a gold-free perovskite solar module (PSM) based on low temperature carbon counter-electrode.

2. Materials and Methods

The 31.36 cm2 module (active area 6.25 cm2) is fabricated by interconnecting in series four n-i-p cells. The stack of each cell and the device process fabrication steps are depicted in Figure 1a,b, respectively.
A nanosecond raster Nd:YVO4 pulsed scanning laser patterned (P1, fluence = 10.5 J/cm2) the FTO (fluorinated tin oxide) glasses (NSG, 7 Ω/sq) to form four series connected cells. Then, we cleaned the substrates in an ultrasonic system by using subsequent solvents (soap/water, acetone, ethanol, and isopropanol) for 5 min each. We deposited 40 nm thick c-TiO2 as reported in [24] and 250 nm thick mp-TiO2 paste (Great Cell Solar 18 nrt, diluted with ethanol 1:4 w/w) by a blade coating method, followed by 30 min@500 °C sintering in oven. The substrates are exposed to a UV lamp and then we deposited the triple cation PVSK (Cs0.05(MA0.17FA0.83)0.95Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3 in DMF/DMSO) (PbI2 from TCI Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; CsI, FAI and MABr from Great Cell Solar, Queanbeyan, Australia) by a double step blade-coating method in ambient air according to Vesce et al. [24]. We reduced the recombination by depositing PEAI (phenethyl ammonium iodide) passivating agent [25,26]. A stable HTM suitable for carbon was deposited by a blade-coating technique. Then, the ETL/PVSK/PEAI/HTL stack is removed from the vertical connection areas by laser (P2, fluence = 200 J/cm2) to series connect two adjacent cells by the counter-electrode. Following this, the carbon counter-electrode (Dyenamo, Stockholm, Sweden) is blade-coated on the cells composing the module and annealed at 120 °C in air for 15 min. The IV curves are reported by a Keithley source meter/LabVIEW under a class A sun simulator (Sun 2000, Abet, Milford, Connecticut) at AM 1.5 1000 W/m2 calibrated by a Skye Instruments sensor Ltd (Llandrindod Wells, UK).

3. Results and Discussion

In the upscaling process from lab-scale cell to module there are different issues to be considered: the high front contact sheet resistance, the interconnection dead area and resistance, and the layer inhomogeneity. In this work, we apply reliable mitigation action to reduce the losses. The sheet resistance is faced by using a low sheet resistance substrate, by adopting the series interconnection strategy, and by optimizing the cell width (i.e., reducing the recombination path). The interconnection dead area is reduced by narrowing the interconnection and separation areas. The laser process optimization is useful in limiting the interconnection resistance. The layer homogeneity is achieved by combining the right coating technique and the material composition according to the deposition environment. Moreover, we worked in ambient air to simulate a real plant condition.
In Figure 1c, the fabricated PVSK carbon-based module exhibits 8.36% and 8.25% efficiency in reverse and forward scan, respectively. The Voc is about 4 V, meaning about 1 V per cell, because the cells are series connected in Z configuration.

4. Conclusions

PV exploitation should avoid high cost and high-CO2 footprint materials and fabrication processes. The adoption of low-temperature carbon-based counter-electrodes permits the avoidance of expensive and unstable organic HTM and metal counter-electrodes, such as gold or silver. In addition, the full fabrication process must be based on scalable printing techniques out of the glove box to be transferred to industry. In this direction, the carbon inks can be deposited by large area printing techniques, such as screen-printing and blade-coating. Since the carbon layer can be annealed at temperature less than 120 °C, the impact from the LCA (life cycle assessment) point of view is low. Here, we demonstrated a printed PSM based on a low temperature carbon counter-electrode.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.V. and A.D.C.; methodology, L.V.; validation, L.V. and A.D.C.; formal analysis, L.V., M.S., and H.N.; investigation, M.S., L.V., and H.N.; resources, A.D.C.; data curation, L.V. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.V.; writing—review and editing, L.V.; visualization, L.V.; supervision, A.D.C. and L.V.; project administration, A.D.C. and L.V.; funding acquisition, A.D.C. and L.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe programme, through an FET Proactive research and innovation action under grant agreement No. 101084124 (DIAMOND) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Program for funding Research and Innovation under grant agreements No. 881603 (Graphene Flagship Core 3). The authors acknowledge the project UNIQUE, supported under the umbrella of SOLARERA. NET_cofund by ANR, PtJ, MUR (GA 775970), MINECOAEI, SWEA, within the European Union Framework Program for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (Cofund ERANET Action, No. 691664).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting reported results are available in repository.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eftekharnejad, S.; Vittal, V.; Heydt, G.T.; Keel, B.; Loehr, J. Impact of increased penetration of photovoltaic generation on power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2013, 28, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barkhouse, D.A.R.; Gunawan, O.; Gokmen, T.; Todorov, T.K.; Mitzi, D.B. Yield predictions for photovoltaic power plants: Empirical validation, recent advances and remaining uncertainties. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2015, 20, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mincuzzi, G.; Vesce, L.; Liberatore, M.; Reale, A.; Di Carlo, A.; Brown, T.M. Laser-sintered TiO2 films for dye solar cell fabrication: An electrical, morphological, and electron lifetime investigation. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2011, 58, 3179–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barichello, J.; Vesce, L.; Mariani, P.; Leonardi, E.; Braglia, R.; Di Carlo, A.; Canini, A.; Reale, A. Stable semi-transparent dye-sensitized solar modules and panels for greenhouse application. Energies 2021, 14, 6393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zardetto, V.; De Angelis, G.; Vesce, L.; Caratto, V.; Mazzuca, C.; Gasiorowski, J.; Reale, A.; Di Carlo, A.; Brown, T.M. Formulations and processing of nanocrystalline TiO2 films for the different requirements of plastic, metal and glass dye solar cell applications. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 255401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dominici, L.; Vesce, L.; Colonna, D.; Michelotti, F.; Brown, T.M.; Reale, A.; Di Carlo, A. Angular and prism coupling refractive enhancement in dye solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 103302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yuvapragasam, A.; Muthukumarasamy, N.; Agilan, S.; Velauthapillai, D.; Senthil, T.S.; Sundaram, S. Natural dye sensitized TiO2 nanorods assembly of broccoli shape based solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2015, 148, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Etxebarria, I.; Ajuria, J.; Pacios, R. Solution-processable polymeric solar cells: A review on materials, strategies and cell architectures to overcome 10%. Org. Electron. 2015, 19, 34–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, G.; Ning, H.; Chen, H.; Jiang, Q.; Jiang, J.; Han, P.; Dang, L.; Xu, M.; Shao, M.; He, F.; et al. Naphthalenothiophene imide-based polymer exhibiting over 17% efficiency. Joule 2021, 5, 931–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vesce, L.; Guidobaldi, A.; Mariani, P.; Di Carlo, A.; Parisi, M.L.; Maranghi, S.; Basosi, R. Scaling-up of Dye Sensitized Solar Modules. World Sci. Ref. Hybrid Mater. 2019, 2, 423–485. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Snaith, H.J. Present status and future prospects of perovskite photovoltaics. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 372–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Feng, S.-P.; Cheng, Y.; Yip, H.-L.; Zhong, Y.; Fong, P.W.K.; Li, G.; Ng, A.; Chen, C.; Castriotta, L.A.; Matteocci, F.; et al. Roadmap on Commercialization of Metal Halide Perovskite Photovoltaics. J. Phys. Mater. 2023, 6, 032501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Green, M.A.; Dunlop, E.D.; Hohl-Ebinger, J.; Yoshita, M.; Kopidakis, N.; Bothe, K.; Hinken, D.; Rauer, M.; Hao, X. Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 60). Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2022, 30, 687–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Green, M.A.; Ho-Baillie, A. Perovskite Solar Cells: The Birth of a New Era in Photovoltaics. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 822–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vesce, L.; Stefanelli, M.; Di Carlo, A. Efficient and stable perovskite large area cells by low-cost fluorene-xantene-based hole transporting layer. Energies 2021, 14, 6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vesce, L.; Riccitelli, R.; Mincuzzi, G.; Orabona, A.; Soscia, G.; Brown, T.M.; Di Carlo, A.; Reale, A. Fabrication of spacer and catalytic layers in monolithic dye-sensitized solar cells. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2013, 3, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bogachuk, D.; Zouhair, S.; Wojciechowski, K.; Yang, B.; Babu, V.; Wagner, L.; Xu, B.; Lim, J.; Mastroianni, S.; Pettersson, H.; et al. Low-Temperature Carbon-based Electrodes in Perovskite Solar Cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 3880–3916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stefanelli, M.; Vesce, L.; Di Carlo, A. Upscaling of Carbon-Based Perovskite Solar Module. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Z.; Shi, T.; Tang, Z.; Sun, B.; Liao, G. Using a low-temperature carbon electrode for preparing hole-conductor-free perovskite heterojunction solar cells under high relative humidity. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 7017–7023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chu, Q.Q.; Ding, B.; Qiu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, C.X.; Li, C.J.; Yang, G.J.; Fang, B. Cost effective perovskite solar cells with a high efficiency and open-circuit voltage based on a perovskite-friendly carbon electrode. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 8271–8279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jiang, P.; Jones, T.W.; Duffy, N.W.; Anderson, K.F.; Bennett, R.; Grigore, M.; Marvig, P.; Xiong, Y.; Liu, T.; Sheng, Y.; et al. Fully printable perovskite solar cells with highly-conductive, lowtemperature, perovskite-compatible carbon electrode. Carbon 2018, 129, 830–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lin, S.; Yang, B.; Qiu, X.; Yan, J.; Shi, J.; Yuan, Y.; Tan, W.; Liu, X.; Huang, H.; Gao, Y.; et al. Efficient and stable planar hole-transport-material-free perovskite solar cells using low temperature processed SnO2 as electron transport material. Org. Electron. 2018, 53, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vesce, L.; Stefanelli, M.; Herterich, J.P.; Castriotta, L.A.; Kohlstädt, M.; Würfel, U.; Di Carlo, A. Ambient Air Blade-Coating Fabrication of Stable Triple-Cation Perovskite Solar Modules by Green Solvent Quenching. Sol. RRL 2021, 5, 2100073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vesce, L.; Stefanelli, M.; Castriotta, L.A.; Hadipour, A.; Lammar, S.; Yang, B.; Suo, J.; Aernouts, T.; Hagfeldt, A.; Di Carlo, A. Hysteresis-free Planar Perovskite Solar Module with 19.1% Efficiency by Interfacial Defects Passivation. Sol. RRL 2022, 6, 2101095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vesce, L.; Stefanelli, M.; Razza, S.; Castriotta, L.A.; Di Giacomo, F.; Di Carlo, A. Process Engineering and Interfacial Defects Passivation of Large Area Perovskite Solar Modules. In Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Milan, Italy, 26–30 September 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) PSC layers; (b) module fabrication process steps; (c) module IV curves in reverse and forward scan.
Figure 1. (a) PSC layers; (b) module fabrication process steps; (c) module IV curves in reverse and forward scan.
Engproc 37 00029 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vesce, L.; Stefanelli, M.; Nikbakht, H.; Di Carlo, A. Process Engineering for Low-Temperature Carbon-Based Perovskite Solar Modules. Eng. Proc. 2023, 37, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECP2023-14721

AMA Style

Vesce L, Stefanelli M, Nikbakht H, Di Carlo A. Process Engineering for Low-Temperature Carbon-Based Perovskite Solar Modules. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 37(1):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECP2023-14721

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vesce, Luigi, Maurizio Stefanelli, Hafez Nikbakht, and Aldo Di Carlo. 2023. "Process Engineering for Low-Temperature Carbon-Based Perovskite Solar Modules" Engineering Proceedings 37, no. 1: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECP2023-14721

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop