Next Article in Journal
Photocatalytic Degradation and Defluorination of Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) Using Biosynthesized TiO2 Nanoparticles under UV–Visible Light
Previous Article in Journal
Statement of Peer Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Insight into Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Sugarcane Bagasse for Bioethanol Production †

1
Nutrition and Bromatology Group, Department of Analytical Chemistry and Food Science, Faculty of Science, Universidade de Vigo, E32004 Ourense, Spain
2
International Joint Research Laboratory of Intelligent Agriculture and Agri-products Processing, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
3
Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (INTEMA-CONICET), Mar del Plata 10850, Argentina
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Processes: Process Engineering—Current State and Future Trends (ECP 2023), 17–31 May 2023; Available online: https://ecp2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 37(1), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECP2023-14673
Published: 17 May 2023

Abstract

:
Lignocellulosic biomass is a powerful material for producing sustainable biofuels because it can be converted into second-generation clean energy capable of coping with the depletion of fossil reserves and rising energy demands. However, pretreatment is required in the conversion process to overcome the recalcitrance of the lignocellulosic biomass; accelerate its disintegration into cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin; and obtain an optimal yield of fermentable sugars in the enzymatic hydrolysis. Steam explosion technology has stood out due to its results and advantages, such as broad applicability, high efficiency in the short term, and lack of contamination. This gentle and quick pretreatment combines high-temperature autohydrolysis and structural alteration via explosive decompression. So, steam at high pressure (1–3.5 MPa) and temperature (180–240 °C) is pressed into the cell walls and plant tissues for a duration of seconds (30 s) to several minutes (20 min). In this aspect, sugarcane bagasse is a promising feedstock for bioethanol production due to its high cellulosic content and availability. Finally, the pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse by applying steam explosion seems to be a feasible economic option for bioethanol production.

1. Introduction: Steam Explosion (SE) as Lignocellulosic Biomass Pretreatment

The production of renewable fuels using lignocellulosic waste from agricultural activities has been considered in recent years as an alternative to traditional fuels [1]. Agricultural waste is defined as anything useless and is characterized by its biodegradability and solid and lignocellulosic composition [1]. In this way, the non-edible lignocellulosic biomass discarded by agriculture feedstock can be used as a matrix to obtain biofuel, being considered second-generation (2G) biofuel [2,3]. Lignocellulosic biomass is mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, which are low-energy-density compounds. So, a pretreatment step is necessary so that plant-specific enzymes can release sugars for biofuel production [2,4].
Pretreatment is an essential technological step to convert lignocellulose into fuels and biochemicals [5]. The purpose of this preliminary step is to reduce the lignin and/or hemicellulose content by modifying the cell wall structure of the biomass, thus increasing the surface area and accessibility to carbohydrates such as cellulose and thereby increasing the yield of fermentable sugars [6,7]. Selecting a suitable pretreatment will significantly increase the efficiency of the hydrolysis process by helping to remove the lignin or hemicellulose and expose the cellulosic component [8].
Steam explosion (SE) is one of the most attractive and uncomplicated pretreatment methods due to its low capital investment, high scalability, and lower hazard of the chemicals involved in the process, among other advantages [9]. SE pretreatment, as a physicochemical modification technology in food raw materials, is a method that presses steam at high pressure (1–3.5 MPa) and temperature (180–240 °C) into cell walls and plant tissues for a few seconds (30 s) to several minutes (20 min), combining the thermochemical action of high-temperature boiling coupled with the physical tearing action of instantaneous blasting [10,11,12]. This leads to the decomposition of the lignocellulosic matrix and partial removal and/or redistribution of lignin, increasing cellulose accessibility [7]. The hydrolysis of hemicellulose components results in the release of mono- and oligosaccharides, the alteration of the chemical structure of lignin, and an improvement in the cellulose crystallinity index and extractability of lignin polymer [13,14].
SE couples autohydrolysis and biomass alteration through high temperature and explosive decompression [11]. The process is usually divided into two independent stages. The first phase operates as a thermochemical reaction, where the vapor boiling and explosion phase takes place. The second phase is a process of adiabatic expansion and conversion of thermal energy into mechanical energy [15,16]. Figure 1 shows the sequence of the basic steps of the SE method and its impact on the matrix.
SE processes can be operated in a continuous or batch mode. Batch reactors are usually used for laboratory-scale pretreatment, while continuous systems are typically used for large-scale industrial processes [11,17]. The equipment is essentially made up of the following three parts: a steam generator, a steam explosion chamber, and a material receiving container [12]. Outstanding benefits of SE pretreatment are the extensive hydrolysis of hemicellulose polymers and the biomass reduction of particle size [18,19]. The smaller the particles, the more available surface area, and the lignin droplets act as a binder, which improves particle-to-particle contact and binding capacity [11]. Also, SE has a high potential for energy efficiency, low capital investment, and lower environmental impact compared to other pretreatment technologies [20].
The effectiveness of SE pretreatment differs depending on factors such as the toughness of the pretreatment conditions (e.g., the temperature and residence time are known as the combined pretreatment severity factor (SF)) and/or the recalcitrance of the biomass (e.g., lignin content) to hydrolysis [21,22]. SF ( R 0 = e T e x p 100 / 14.75 ) is an influential parameter that defines the relationship between hydrothermal severity (operating conditions and physicochemical changes) and lignocellulosic biomass fractionation [23].
It should also be noted that the by-products likely to be generated during the SE process are divided into three groups: weak acids, furanic derivatives, and phenolic compounds [24]. In view of the above, the purpose of this review has been to compile the most recent information about SE pretreatment using sugarcane bagasse as raw material.

2. Sugarcane Bagasse (SCB) as a Potential Matrix for Bioethanol Production

Sugarcane (Saccharum oficinarum L.) is a tropical grass of the Gramineae family and the Saccharum genus, characterized for being large and perennial [25]. The sugarcane cultivation requirements are 6–12 months to grow and 60–100 cm3 of water [26], being mainly cropped in countries such as Brazil, India, or China for sugar production, contributing to their economic development [25,27]. Sucrose is the main product of sugarcane, which is accumulated in the internodes of the stalk [28]. However, sugarcane production generates a percentage of waste that varies between 25–30% [29], so the by-product reutilization is key from the circular economy point of view. These residues produced by the sugarcane industry can be classified as straw, the harvest residue, and bagasse, the fibrous fraction that follows the juice extraction [25]. These two by-products are characterized by their lignocellulosic composition, with cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose being the major components, which also have extractants and ashes in their composition [30]. For bioethanol production, the cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin matrix composition must be considered [28], so SCB has been considered a suitable matrix for its production. SCB is defined as the waste obtained after the collection of sugarcane stem juice [1]. Bioethanol produced using SCB is less carbon-intensive compared to fossil fuels, so air pollution can be reduced [28]. Therefore, its use is also remarkable from a carbon print perspective. The SCB is approximately composed of 45–50% of cellulose, 25–30% of hemicellulose, 25% of lignin, and 2.4–9% of ash [28].
From an economic point of view, it is necessary to consider the scaling-up feasibility of bioethanol production using SCB and SE pretreatment. In this way, the industrial production of bioethanol has been examined in some studies. The techno-economic feasibility of bioethanol production also includes the enzymatic hydrolysis of sugars, where the bioethanol is obtained, although this work has not highlighted this step. Mary Joseph et al. studied the economic feasibility of SCB bioethanol using Aspen Plus V11. Total capital investment per gallon was estimated, being 17 USD as the final cost [31]. Internal rate of returns (IRR) and ethanol production cost were also studied by Junqueira et al. Results showed an expense of SCB bioethanol between 0.59, 0.68, and 0.69 R$/L when SE was applied with pentoses fermentation, pentoses biodigestion, or alkaline delignification after pretreatment, respectively [32]. Moreover, this study compared SE and hydrothermal pretreatment costs, showing that ethanol production was higher when SE was applied. The best economic results (considering a high IRR value and a low production cost) were obtained with SE with pentoses fermentation [32].
Considering the data shown, SE seems to be a suitable pretreatment for bioethanol production using SCB biomass since high temperatures and pressure allows the reduction of both lignin and hemicellulose compounds, improving the sugar releasement and, hence, bioethanol production. Moreover, this process has been studied from a techno-economic point of view, showing suitable results.

3. Conclusions

A new era of biofuel production has been promoted in recent years due to the current carbon emissions generated by conventional fuels. In this way, alternative pathways have been developed, and bioethanol production using lignocellulosic biomass is one of the suitable options. However, a pretreatment step of the biomass is needed to achieve bioethanol production. Thus, SE has been widely studied as a potential thermo-mechanic pretreatment to be incorporated into this process. SE is a pretreatment method that uses high temperatures and pressure conditions to achieve sugar releasement in a low-time process. SE is also characterized by its broad applicability, high efficiency in the short term, and lack of contamination despite its conventionality. Although different matrices can be used for bioethanol production, SCB has a particular interest since sugar production generates high amounts of this by-product, and elimination is currently an issue. Several studies showed positive results for both sugar conversion and cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin content reduction when SE was applied in SCB, with the main advantages being the following:
-
SE is a low-time process that can be performed in a batch or continuous mode.
-
SE requires low equipment investment; it has high energy efficiency and low environmental impact.
-
By applying SE, hemicellulose is extensively hydrolyzed, and biomass particle size is significantly reduced.
-
SCB is a suitable biomass to be pretreated by SE for bioethanol production, showing a feasible economic scaling-up.
Considering the data provided, bioethanol production using SCB as the biomass and SE as the pretreatment methodology seems to be a suitable new pathway to be considered.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting material can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ECP2023-14673/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.B., A.P.-V. and M.C.; methodology, P.B., A.P.-V., S.S.-M. and P.D.; software, P.B. and A.P.-V.; validation, M.F.-C., P.O. and L.C.; formal analysis, M.C. and M.A.P.; investigation, P.B. and A.P.-V.; resources, J.X., J.S.-G. and M.A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, P.B., A.P.-V., S.S.-M. and P.D.; writing—review and editing, M.C., M.F.-C., P.O. and L.C.; visualization, M.C., M.A.P. and L.C.; supervision, J.X., J.S.-G., M.A.P. and L.C.; project administration, M.A.P. and L.C.; funding acquisition, J.X., J.S.-G. and M.A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research leading to these results was supported by MICINN, which provided the Ramón y Cajal grant for M.A. Prieto (RYC-2017-22891) and Jianbo Xiao (RYC-2020-030365-I); by Xunta de Galicia for supporting the program EXCELENCIA-ED431F 2020/12, the post-doctoral grant of M. Fraga-Corral (ED481B-2019/096), L. Cassani (ED481B-2021/152), and pre-doctoral grant of M. Carpena (ED481A 2021/313). The authors are grateful to the Ibero-American Program on Science and Technology (CYTED—AQUA-CIBUS, P317RT0003) and to the Bio Based Industries Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 888003 UP4HEALTH Project (H2020-BBI-JTI-2019) that supports the work of P. Otero.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khaire, K.C.; Moholkar, V.S.; Goyal, A. Bioconversion of Sugarcane Tops to Bioethanol and Other Value Added Products: An Overview. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2021, 4, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kesharwani, R.; Sun, Z.; Dagli, C.; Xiong, H. Moving Second Generation Biofuel Manufacturing Forward: Investigating Economic Viability and Environmental Sustainability Considering Two Strategies for Supply Chain Restructuring. Appl. Energy 2019, 242, 1467–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Soares de Carvalho Freitas, E.; Xavier, L.H.; Oliveira, L.B.; Guarieiro, L.L.N. System Dynamics Applied to Second Generation Biofuel in Brazil: A Circular Economy Approach. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 52, 102288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kirshner, J.; Brown, E.; Dunlop, L.; Franco Cairo, J.P.; Redeker, K.; Veneu, F.; Brooks, S.; Kirshner, S.; Walton, P.H. “A Future beyond Sugar”: Examining Second-Generation Biofuel Pathways in Alagoas, Northeast Brazil. Environ. Dev. 2022, 44, 100739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. do Espirito Santo, M.C.; Cardoso, E.B.; Guimaraes, F.E.G.; DeAzevedo, E.R.; da Cunha, G.P.; Novotny, E.H.; Pellegrini, V.D.O.A.; Chandel, A.K.; Silveira, M.H.L.; Polikarpov, I. Multifaceted Characterization of Sugarcane Bagasse under Different Steam Explosion Severity Conditions Leading to Distinct Enzymatic Hydrolysis Yields. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 139, 111542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Silva, T.A.L.; Zamora, H.D.Z.; Varão, L.H.R.; Prado, N.S.; Baffi, M.A.; Pasquini, D. Effect of Steam Explosion Pretreatment Catalysed by Organic Acid and Alkali on Chemical and Structural Properties and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Sugarcane Bagasse. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018, 9, 2191–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Auxenfans, T.; Crônier, D.; Chabbert, B.; Paës, G. Understanding the Structural and Chemical Changes of Plant Biomass Following Steam Explosion Pretreatment. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Algayyim, S.J.M.; Yusaf, T.; Hamza, N.H.; Wandel, A.P.; Fattah, I.M.R.; Laimon, M.; Rahman, S.M.A. Sugarcane Biomass as a Source of Biofuel for Internal Combustion Engines (Ethanol and Acetone-Butanol-Ethanol): A Review of Economic Challenges. Energies 2022, 15, 8644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Capolupo, L.; Faraco, V. Green Methods of Lignocellulose Pretreatment for Biorefinery Development. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 9451–9467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, Y.; Wu, J.; Ren, X.; Lau, A.; Rezaei, H.; Takada, M.; Bi, X.; Sokhansanj, S. Steam Explosion of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Multiple Advanced Bioenergy Processes: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 154, 111871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, C.; Ni, L.; Guo, Z.; Zeng, H.; Wu, M.; Zhang, M.; Zheng, B. Principle and Application of Steam Explosion Technology in Modification of Food Fiber. Foods 2022, 11, 3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, Q.; Ziegler-Devin, I.; Chrusciel, L.; Obame, S.N.; Hong, L.; Lu, X.; Brosse, N. Lignin-First Integrated Steam Explosion Process for Green Wood Adhesive Application. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 5380–5392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Onyenwoke, C.; Tabil, L.G.; Dumonceaux, T.; Cree, D.; Mupondwa, E.; Adapa, P.; Karunakaran, C. Investigation of Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Sawdust and Oat Straw to Improve Their Quality as Biofuel Pellets. Energies 2022, 15, 7168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ziegler-Devin, I.; Chrusciel, L.; Brosse, N. Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Mini-Review of Theorical and Experimental Approaches. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, Z.; Zhang, B.; Yu, F.; Xu, G.; Song, A. A Real Explosion: The Requirement of Steam Explosion Pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 121, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh, S.; Ghosh, S.B.; Sain, M. The Use of Biobased Nanofibres in Composites. In Biofiber Reinforcements in Composite Materials; Faruk, O.M.S., Ed.; Elsevier Ltd.: Pilani, India, 2015; pp. 571–647. ISBN 9781782421276. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gao, Z.; Alshehri, K.; Li, Y.; Qian, H.; Sapsford, D.; Cleall, P.; Harbottle, M. Advances in Biological Techniques for Sustainable Lignocellulosic Waste Utilization in Biogas Production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 170, 112995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Leskinen, T.; Kelley, S.S.; Argyropoulos, D.S. E-Beam Irradiation & Steam Explosion as Biomass Pretreatment, and the Complex Role of Lignin in Substrate Recalcitrance. Biomass Bioenergy 2017, 103, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, G.; Kuang, G.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Pan, Z.H. Effect of Steam Explosion on Physicochemical Properties and Fermentation Characteristics of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Lwt 2020, 129, 109579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bhukya, B.; Keshav, P.K. An Evaluation of Steam Explosion Pretreatment to Enhance the Digestibility of Lignocellulosic Biomass. In Lignocellulose Bioconversion Through White Biotechnology; Chandel, A.K., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Telangana, India, 2022; pp. 83–98. ISBN 9781119735984. [Google Scholar]
  21. Akizuki, S.; Suzuki, H.; Fujiwara, M.; Toda, T. Impacts of Steam Explosion Pretreatment on Semi-Continuous Anaerobic Digestion of Lignin-Rich Submerged Macrophyte. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 385, 135377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Michalak, L.; Knutsen, S.H.; Aarum, I.; Westereng, B. Effects of PH on Steam Explosion Extraction of Acetylated Galactoglucomannan from Norway Spruce. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ruiz, H.A.; Galbe, M.; Garrote, G.; Ramirez-Gutierrez, D.M.; Ximenes, E.; Sun, S.N.; Lachos-Perez, D.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Sun, R.C.; Yang, B.; et al. Severity Factor Kinetic Model as a Strategic Parameter of Hydrothermal Processing (Steam Explosion and Liquid Hot Water) for Biomass Fractionation under Biorefinery Concept. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 342, 125961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, Z.M.; Yu, W.; Huang, C.; Xue, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, D.; Li, G. Steam Explosion Pretreatment Enhancing Enzymatic Digestibility of Overground Tubers of Tiger Nut (Cyperus esculentus L.). Front. Nutr. 2023, 9, 1093277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Antunes, F.; Mota, I.F.; da Silva Burgal, J.; Pintado, M.; Costa, P.S. A Review on the Valorization of Lignin from Sugarcane By-Products: From Extraction to Application. In Biomass and Bioenergy; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 2022; Volume 166, p. 106603. [Google Scholar]
  26. Moore, P.H. Sugarcane and Sugarbeet. In Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences; Elselvier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bhardwaj, N.K.; Kaur, D.; Chaudhry, S.; Sharma, M.; Arya, S. Approaches for Converting Sugarcane Trash, a Promising Agro Residue, into Pulp and Paper Using Soda Pulping and Elemental Chlorine-Free Bleaching. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 217, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Niju, S.; Swathika, M. Delignification of Sugarcane Bagasse Using Pretreatment Strategies for Bioethanol Production. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 20, 101263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vaish, S.; Kaur, G.; Sharma, N.K.; Gakkhar, N. Estimation for Potential of Agricultural Biomass Sources as Projections of Bio-Briquettes in Indian Context. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. del Río, J.C.; Lino, A.G.; Colodette, J.L.; Lima, C.F.; Gutiérrez, A.; Martínez, Á.T.; Lu, F.; Ralph, J.; Rencoret, J. Differences in the Chemical Structure of the Lignins from Sugarcane Bagasse and Straw. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 81, 322–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Joseph, A.M.; Tulasi, Y.; Shrivastava, D.; Kiran, B. Techno-Economic Feasibility and Exergy Analysis of Bioethanol Production from Waste. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2023, 18, 100358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Junqueira, T.L.; Dias, M.O.S.; Cavalett, O.; Jesus, C.D.F.; Cunha, M.P.; Rossell, C.E.V.; Maciel Filho, R.; Bonomi, A. Economic and Environmental Assessment of Integrated 1 St and 2 Nd Generation Sugarcane Bioethanol Production Evaluating Different 2 Nd Generation Process Alternatives. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 2012, 30, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustration on the process of lignocellulosic material disruption and released molecules.
Figure 1. Illustration on the process of lignocellulosic material disruption and released molecules.
Engproc 37 00113 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barciela, P.; Perez-Vazquez, A.; Carpena, M.; Seyyedi-Mansour, S.; Donn, P.; Fraga-Corral, M.; Otero, P.; Xiao, J.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Prieto, M.A.; et al. Insight into Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Sugarcane Bagasse for Bioethanol Production. Eng. Proc. 2023, 37, 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECP2023-14673

AMA Style

Barciela P, Perez-Vazquez A, Carpena M, Seyyedi-Mansour S, Donn P, Fraga-Corral M, Otero P, Xiao J, Simal-Gandara J, Prieto MA, et al. Insight into Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Sugarcane Bagasse for Bioethanol Production. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 37(1):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECP2023-14673

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barciela, Paula, Ana Perez-Vazquez, Maria Carpena, Sepidar Seyyedi-Mansour, Pauline Donn, Maria Fraga-Corral, Paz Otero, Jianbo Xiao, Jesus Simal-Gandara, Miguel A. Prieto, and et al. 2023. "Insight into Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Sugarcane Bagasse for Bioethanol Production" Engineering Proceedings 37, no. 1: 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECP2023-14673

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop